Table of Contents
Schedule UTP asks for information about tax positions that affect the U.S. federal income tax liabilities of certain corporations that issue or are included in audited financial statements and have assets that equal or exceed $50 million.
-
The corporation has taken a tax position on its U.S. federal income tax return for the current tax year or for a prior tax year.
-
Either the corporation or a related party has recorded a reserve with respect to that tax position for U.S. federal income tax in audited financial statements, or the corporation or related party did not record a reserve for that tax position because the corporation expects to litigate the position.
A corporation must file Schedule UTP with its income tax return if:
-
The corporation files Form 1120, U.S. Corporation Income Tax Return; Form 1120-F, U.S. Income Tax Return of a Foreign Corporation; Form 1120-L, U.S. Life Insurance Company Income Tax Return; or Form 1120-PC, U.S. Property and Casualty Insurance Company Income Tax Return;
-
The corporation has assets that equal or exceed $50 million;
-
The corporation or a related party issued audited financial statements reporting all or a portion of the corporation’s operations for all or a portion of the corporation’s tax year; and
-
The corporation has one or more tax positions that must be reported on Schedule UTP.
Do not file a blank Schedule UTP if there are no tax positions to be reported.
Attach Schedule UTP to the corporation's income tax return. Do not file it separately. A taxpayer that files a protective Form 1120, 1120-F, 1120-L, or 1120-PC must also file Schedule UTP if it satisfies the four requirements set forth above.
A corporation required to file Schedule UTP also must check “Yes” to Form 1120, Schedule K, Question 14; Form 1120-F, Additional Information, Question AA; Form 1120-L, Schedule M, Question 15; or Form 1120-PC, Schedule I, Question 13.
A corporation’s assets equal or exceed $50 million if the amount reported on page 1, item D of Form 1120, or the higher of the beginning or end of year total assets reported on Schedule L of Form 1120-L or Form 1120-PC, is at least $50 million.
The assets of a corporation filing a Form 1120-F equal or exceed $50 million if the higher of the beginning or end of year total worldwide assets of the corporation reported on Form 1120-F, Schedule L, Line 17, would be at least $50 million if the corporation were to prepare a Schedule L on a worldwide basis.
Corporations meeting all other Schedule UTP filing requirements must file a Schedule UTP if total assets equal or exceed the applicable asset threshold for the tax year, as follows:
| Tax Year | Assets Threshold |
| 2010, 2011 | $100 million |
| 2012, 2013 | $50 million |
| 2014 and after | $10 million |
Note.
All examples in these instructions assume the calendar year is the reporting year both for U.S. federal income tax and financial statement purposes and the independent auditor’s opinion on the audited financial statements is issued before the filing of the tax return.
Example 1. General rule regarding recording a reserve.
A corporation recorded a reserve in its 2010 audited financial statements relating to a tax position taken on its tax return for the 2010 tax year. The corporation filed its 2010 tax return on September 15, 2011. The corporation must report the 2010 tax position on Part I of Schedule UTP and file Schedule UTP with its 2010 tax return. If the corporation increases its reserve with respect to the tax position taken on its 2010 tax return in its 2012 audited financial statements, the corporation is not required to report the 2010 tax position again on its 2012 tax return as a result of the reserve increase in 2012.
Example 2. Reporting reserves in subsequent years.
A corporation claims a deduction in 2011 and determines under applicable accounting standards that it can recognize the full benefit of the position. In 2013 the IRS begins an examination of the 2011 tax return and decides to examine whether the deduction is proper. The corporation subsequently reevaluates the tax position and records a reserve for that position in 2013. The corporation has taken a tax position in its 2011 tax return and recorded a reserve with respect to that tax position. The corporation must report the tax position on Schedule UTP filed with its 2013 tax return even if the IRS identifies the tax position for examination prior to the recording of the reserve.
Example 3. Related party general rule.
Corporation A is a corporation filing Form 1120 that has $160 million of assets. Corporation B is a foreign corporation not doing business in the United States and is a related party to Corporation A. Corporations A and B issue their own audited financial statements. Corporation A takes a tax position on its tax return. If Corporation B records a reserve with respect to that tax position in its own audited financial statements, even though Corporation A does not, then that tax position must be reported by Corporation A on its Schedule UTP.
Example 4. Reserve recorded in consolidated financial statements.
Corporation C files a tax return and has assets of $160 million. Corporations C and D issue consolidated audited financial statements, but they do not file a consolidated tax return. Corporation C takes a tax position for which a reserve was recorded in the consolidated financial statements of Corporations C and D. The tax position taken by Corporation C on its tax return must be reported on its Schedule UTP because a reserve was recorded for its tax position in consolidated financial statements in which Corporation C was included.
Example 5. Reserve not recorded after a change in circumstances based on expectation to litigate.
A corporation takes a tax position on its 2011 tax return for which no reserve is recorded because the corporation determines the tax position is correct. Circumstances change, and in 2013 the corporation determines that the tax position is uncertain, but does not record a reserve because of its expectation to litigate the position. That is, the corporation or a related party determines the probability of settling with the IRS to be less than 50% and, under applicable accounting standards, no reserve was recorded because the corporation intends to litigate the tax position and has determined that it is more likely than not to prevail on the merits in the litigation. The corporation must report that position on Part II of the Schedule UTP filed with the 2013 tax return either if it records a reserve or if it does not record a reserve because it expects to litigate, even if that decision to record or not record occurs because of a change in circumstances in a later year.
Note.
Although the use of an NOL or a credit carryforward is a tax position taken on a tax return, do not report the use of the NOL or credit carryforward if the corporation has previously reported the tax position that created or added to the NOL or credit carryforward on Schedule UTP. See Example 10.
Example 6. Unit of account.
Corporation A and Corporation B each have two individual research projects and each anticipates claiming a research and development credit arising out of their projects. Corporation A chooses each individual research project as the unit of account for GAAP financial reporting purposes, since the corporation accumulates information for the tax return about the projects at the project level and expects the IRS to address the issues during an examination of each project separately. Corporation B determines that the appropriate unit of account for GAAP financial reporting purposes is the functional expenditures, based on the amount of its expenditures, the anticipated credits to be claimed, its previous experience, and the advice of its tax advisors. Based on the unit of account used for financial reporting purposes, Corporation A must use each project as its unit of account for Schedule UTP reporting, and Corporation B must use functional expenditures as its unit of account for Schedule UTP reporting, regarding the research and development credit.
The corporation must rank by size each tax position listed in Part I. The size of a tax position, however, need not be reported anywhere on Schedule UTP. See the instructions for Part I, column (f), regarding coding to be used to rank the corporation’s tax positions.
A complete and accurate disclosure of a tax position on the appropriate year’s Schedule UTP will be treated as if the corporation filed a Form 8275, Disclosure Statement, or Form 8275-R, Regulation Disclosure Statement, regarding the tax position. A separate Form 8275 or Form 8275-R need not be filed to avoid certain accuracy-related penalties with respect to that tax position.
Example 7. Multiple year positions.
A corporation incurred an expenditure in 2010 and claimed the entire amount as a deduction on its 2010 return. During the course of reviewing its tax positions for purposes of establishing reserves for U.S. federal income taxes for its 2010 audited financial statements, the corporation determines it is uncertain whether the expenditure should instead be amortized over 5 years and records a reserve with respect to the position taken in 2010. The corporation did not record a reserve for any of the positions taken in tax years 2011 through 2014. The corporation has taken a tax position in each of the 5 tax years because, on each year’s tax return, there would be an adjustment to a line item on that return if the position taken in that year’s return is not sustained. The tax position taken in the 2010 tax year must be reported on Part I of Schedule UTP filed with the 2010 tax return. None of the 2011 to 2014 tax positions must be reported on Schedule UTP because the corporation did not record a reserve with respect to any of those tax positions.
Example 8. Multiple year positions.
A corporation incurred an expenditure in 2010 and takes the position that the expenditure may be amortized over 5 years beginning on its 2010 tax return. During the course of reviewing its tax positions for purposes of establishing reserves for U.S. federal income taxes for its 2010 audited financial statements, the corporation determines it is uncertain whether any deduction or amortization of this expenditure is allowable. In the 2010 audited financial statements, the corporation recorded a reserve with respect to the amortization deduction to be claimed in each tax year. The corporation has taken a tax position in each of the 5 tax years because on each year’s tax return there would be an adjustment to a line item on that return if the position taken in that year is not sustained. The corporation must report the 2010 tax position on Part I of Schedule UTP for the 2010 tax year. In addition, the tax position to be taken in each of the 2011 to 2014 tax years must be reported on Part I of the Schedule UTP filed with the tax return for the respective tax year in which the tax position was taken. The result would be the same if, instead of recording the reserve in 2010 for all of the tax positions taken in each of the 5 years, the corporation records a reserve in each year that specifically relates to the tax position taken on the return for that year.
Example 9. Transition rule.
The facts are the same as in Example 8, except that the corporation incurred the expenditure and recorded the reserve in 2009. The corporation has taken a tax position in each of the 5 tax years (2009 through 2013) because on each year’s tax return there would be an adjustment to a line item on that return if the position taken in that year is not sustained. However, the corporation should not report the tax position taken in the 2009 tax year because it was taken in a tax year beginning before January 1, 2010. The tax position taken in each of the 2010 to 2013 tax years must be reported on Part I of the Schedule UTP filed with the tax return for the respective tax year in which the position was taken.
Example 10. Creation and use of net operating loss (NOL).
A corporation incurred a $50 expenditure in 2010 and claimed the entire amount as a deduction on its 2010 tax return. The deduction increases the corporation’s NOL carryforward from $100 to $150. The corporation uses the entire $150 NOL carryforward on its 2011 tax return. Claiming the $50 deduction in 2010 is a tax position taken in the 2010 tax year because the position would result in an adjustment to a line item on the 2010 tax return if the position is not sustained. The deduction in 2011 of the NOL carried forward from 2010 is a tax position taken on the 2011 tax return, because the position would result in an adjustment to a line item on the 2011 tax return if the position is not sustained. The corporation recorded a reserve with respect to its 2010 tax position, in its 2010 audited financial statements. Because the corporation recorded a reserve with respect to the tax position taken in 2010, it reported the 2010 tax position on the Schedule UTP filed with its 2010 tax return. Because it reported the tax position in its 2010 tax return, the corporation should not report the 2011 tax position on the Schedule UTP filed with its tax return for the 2011 tax year.
Example 11. Corporate merger.
On June 30, 2011, MergerCo merges into AcquiringCo, in a transaction in which AcquiringCo survives. MergerCo’s tax year ends on that date. After the merger, AcquiringCo records a reserve with respect to a tax position that is taken on MergerCo’s final return in its audited financial statements. That tax position must be reported on Part I of the Schedule UTP filed with MergerCo’s 2011 tax return even though the reserve was recorded by AcquiringCo. AcquiringCo should not report the tax position on the Schedule UTP filed with its 2011 tax return because MergerCo’s final return is a prior year tax return on which the tax position was reported.
| More Online Instructions |