- 20.1.6.1 Introduction
- 20.1.6.2 Penalty Case
- 20.1.6.3 Overview - Preparer, Promoter, Material Advisor, and Failure to Disclose Reportable Transaction Penalties
- 20.1.6.4 IRC 6694 Understatement of Taxpayer's Liability by Tax Return Preparer
- 20.1.6.5 IRC 6695 Penalties That May Apply to a Tax Return Preparer
Manual Transmittal
May 16, 2012
Purpose
(1) To transmit revised IRM 20.1.6, Penalty Handbook, Preparer, Promoter, Material Advisor Penalties.
Background
IRM 20.1.6 provides information regarding the Servicewide Preparer, Promoter, Material Advisor Penalties policies and procedures.
These penalties are included within IRC Chapter 68, Subchapter B, Assessable Penalties, and are not return related penalties. They are not subject to deficiency procedures.
Material Changes
(1) This IRM has been rearranged for clarity. Other significant changes are as follows :
| Reference | Description of Change |
|---|---|
| IRM 20.1.6.1.1.2 (3) | Added when to check yes for the Preparer Section Workpaper 300-1-1 |
| IRM 20.1.6.2.2 | Added new section No Change and Discontinued Investigation Cases |
| IRM 20.1.6.2.3 | Added new section Civil Penalty Name Line |
| IRM 20.1.6.2.4 | Added new section Soliciting Examination Payment |
| IRM 20.1.6.3 (1)(d) | Added new item Failure to Disclose Reportable Transaction |
| IRM 20.1.6.4.2 (7) | Added reference to IRC 7701(a)(36)(B)(iv), Exception to Definition of a Tax Return Preparer |
| IRM 20.1.6.5 (2)(g) | Update for change in penalty amount |
| IRM 20.1.6.5.3 (3) | Updated to include Treas. Reg. 1.6109 use of Preparer Tax Identification Number (PTIN) |
| IRM 20.1.6.5.7 | Incorporated interim procedural update (IPU) 12U0433, which revised the penalty amounts per IRC 6695(g) |
| IRM 20.1.6.5.7.1 | Incorporated IPU 12U0526, which revised the Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC) penalty amount and the Form 8867, Paid Preparers Earned Income Credit Checklist, filing requirements |
| IRM 20.1.6.5.9 (2) | Added to include Treas. Reg. 1.6109 use of PTIN |
| IRM 20.1.6.6 (5)(b) | Added Return Preparer Coordinator (RPC) cross functional coordination |
| IRM 20.1.6.11.1 (5) | Added see IRM 4.21.1 Monitoring the IRS e-file Program. |
| IRM 20.1.6.11.2 (4) | Added to include Treas. Reg. 301.6011-7 for calendar 2011 |
| IRM 20.1.6.12 (12) | Added a requirement to send Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) the original and RPC the copy. |
| IRM 20.1.6.14.3 (2) | Deleted IRC 6701 Appraisal Issue Responsibility Committee because it is disbanded |
| IRM 20.1.6.17 | Added new section Failure to Include Reportable Transaction with Return - IRC 6707A Penalty |
| IRM 20.1.6.19 (2) | IRC 6694 and IRC 6695 preparer penalty appeals designation changed to appeals coordination issue category of case from appeals coordinated issue |
| IRM 20.1.6.19.1 | Added new section "Pre-Assessment Appeals IRC 6694, IRC 6695, IRC 6707A, and IRC 6713" |
| IRM 20.1.6.19.3 | Added new section Denial of Claim No Prior Appeals Hearing |
| IRM 20.1.6.19.4 | Added new section Appeals for Special Claims |
| IRM 20.1.6.21 (1)(f) | Added a reference for IRC 6707A |
Effect on Other Documents
This IRM supersedes IRM 20.1.6 dated September 17, 2010. Incorporated IPU 12U0433 issued 02-16-2012 to reflect IRC 6695(g) penalty rate applicable to tax returns and claims for refund for tax years ending on or after 12/31/2011. Incorporated IPU 12U0526 issued 03-01-2012 which requires Form 8867, Paid Preparer's Earned Income Credit Checksheet, be submitted to the IRS per Treas.Reg. 1.6695-2(b).Audience
All operating division employees that work with penalties.Effective Date
(05-16-2012)Justin Abold
Acting Director, Exam Policy
Small Business/Self-Employed
-
This IRM provides guidelines to be followed by all operational and processing functions.
-
The IRS has penalty and injunctive authority to address improper tax return preparation, and abusive transaction promoters. The Internal Revenue Code (IRC) contains penalties to stop fraudulent, unscrupulous, and/or incompetent tax return preparers, abusive transaction promoters, and material advisors that fail to furnish information or maintain lists with respect to reportable transactions. Penalty assertion is one enforcement vehicle for noncompliant return preparers, promoters, and material advisors.
-
Preparer, promoter, and material advisor penalties are important tools for the IRS to collect the proper amount of tax revenue at the least cost. Penalties provide the Service with an important tool to achieve that goal because they enhance voluntary compliance by taxpayers. See Policy Penalty Statement 20-1, IRM 1.2.20.1.1, Penalties are used to enhance voluntary compliance.
-
Each division has developed programs to administer preparer, promoter, and material advisor penalties. See IRM 4.32, Abusive Tax Avoidance Transactions (ATAT), for functional procedures involving ATAT issues for SB/SE and LB&I. The return preparer penalty program addresses return preparer penalties and electronic filing requirements. See IRM 4.32.2, The Abusive Transactions (AT) Process.
-
IRM 20.1.6 provides servicewide policy for the administration of return preparer penalties, promoter penalties, and material advisor penalties.
-
IRS operating divisions/business unit (OD/BU) functions may develop additional guidance or reference materials for their specific OD/BU functional administrative needs. These reference materials must receive approval from Office of Servicewide Penalties (OSP) prior to distribution, and must remain consistent with:
-
The procedures set forth in this IRM, and
-
The philosophy of Policy Statement 20-1. See IRM 1.2.20.1.1.
-
-
Overall responsibility for the penalty programs is assigned to the Office of Servicewide Penalties (OSP). OSP is a matrix organization residing in SB/SE Examination Division, Examination Policy. OSP is charged with coordinating policy and procedures concerning the administration of penalty programs and ensuring consistency with the penalty policy statement.
-
Every function in the IRS has a role in proper return preparer penalties, promoter penalties, and material advisor penalty administration. It is essential that each function conduct its operations with an emphasis on promoting voluntary compliance.
-
Examiners should keep the following objectives in mind when handling each return preparer penalty, promoter penalty, and material advisor penalty case:
-
Each taxpayer should have the opportunity to have their interests heard and considered.
-
Strive to make a good determination in the first instance. A wrong decision, even though eventually corrected, has a negative impact on voluntary compliance.
-
Provide opportunity for incorrect decisions to be corrected.
-
Treat each case in an impartial and honest way.
-
Use each return preparer penalty, promoter penalty, and material advisor penalty case as an opportunity to educate the taxpayer, help the taxpayer understand their legal obligations and rights, assist the taxpayer in understanding their procedural rights, and observe the taxpayer’s procedural rights.
-
Endeavor to promptly process and resolve each taxpayer’s case.
-
-
The IRS’s approach to return preparer penalties, promoter penalties, and material advisor penalties administration must ensure:
-
Consistency: The IRS should apply the return preparer penalty, promoter penalty, and material advisor penalty equally in similar situations. Taxpayers base their perceptions about the fairness of the system on their own experience and the information they receive from the media and others. If the IRS does not administer penalties uniformly (guided by the applicable statutes, regulations, and procedures) overall confidence in the tax system is jeopardized.
-
Accuracy: The IRS must arrive at the correct decision for each penalty decision. Accuracy is essential. Erroneous penalty assessments and incorrect calculations confuse taxpayers and undermine the overall competency of the IRS.
-
Impartiality: IRS employees are responsible for administering penalties in an even-handed manner that is fair and impartial to both the government and the taxpayer.
-
Representation: Taxpayers must be given the opportunity to have their interests heard and considered. Employees need to take an active and objective role in case resolution so that all factors are considered.
-
-
IRC 6751(b), Approval of Assessment, provides, in general, that no penalty under the Code shall be assessed unless the initial determination of such assessment is personally approved (in writing) by the immediate supervisor of the individual making such determination or such higher level official as the Secretary may designate. This provision is effective for notices issued and penalties assessed after June 30, 2001. At this time, the Secretary has not designated any higher level official for notices issued and penalties assessed to approve initial determinations.
-
To ensure there is not already an open PAC or criminal investigation, the examiner should contact the RPC prior to going forward with the penalty investigation.
-
In the course of a taxpayer client's examination, if the examiner determines a separate return preparer investigation is warranted, the examiner must secure managerial approval. When the determination is made that the return preparer may be responsible for the understatement of tax the response in the Workpaper 300-1-1 or its functional equivalent under the preparer section is to check "yes" in the box "Consider Penalty."
-
If the manager approves the penalty investigation, the separate penalty examination case will be controlled and established on Examination Returns Control System (ERCS) or the Reporting Compliance Case Management System (RCCMS) for TEGE cases.
-
Form 5809, Preparer Penalty Case Control Card, is completed for operating divisions using ERCS. Form 5809 is signed by the manager and retained in the preparer penalty case file.
Note:
TE/GE penalty investigations will be controlled and established on RCCMS. Visit the TE/GE's RCCMS website at http://tege.web.irs.gov/templates/TEGEHOME.asp for preparer penalty investigation procedures.
-
Form 8278, Assessment and Abatement of Miscellaneous Civil Penalties, requires that both the originator and manager sign and date the form. If the Form 8278 is not signed by both the manager and the originator, the form and associated case file should be returned to the sender using Form 3210, Document Transmittal, procedures. Expedited handling is required for imminent statute cases.
-
Reminders for Form 8278, Assessment and Abatement of Miscellaneous Civil Penalties.
-
The applicable penalty reference number (PRN) is provided on Form 8278. Therefore, it is crucial that the examiner always use the most current version of the form available from the Forms repository.
-
The PRN is used to generate the notice language the taxpayer receives.
-
The PRN is used to assess the penalty on Master File by posting a TC 240 on either MFT 13 (BMF) or MFT 55 (IMF).
-
The notice the taxpayer receives is the IRC 6671 required notice and demand for payment to the taxpayer that provides an explanation of the penalty being assessed (or reference the explanation provided by the examiner), the amount due, and the other actions available.
-
Form 8278 for no-change and discontinued investigation cases Item 9(c) should be blank for Penalty No-Change and/or Withdrawal Cases and Item 9(d) is 0.00 for a specific Item 9(a) and the same Item 9(b).
-
The Form 8278 Item 9(d) of 0.00 results in the PRN with an 0.00 amount posting to the MFT 55 (IMF) or MFT 13 (BMF) Civil Penalty Master File and the DLN of the administrative case file.
Note:
Applies for cases that are not related to a PAC (Return Preparer Program Action Case). See IRM 4.1.10.10.3.11 .
-
Form 2363, Master File Entity Change, is not required to establish the Civil Penalty Name Line when the related MFT 30 filing status is married filing joint (MFJ).
-
Form 8278 Item 1 of Taxpayer's Name (single name) is used to establish the CVPN for all MFT 55 civil penalties including taxpayer's with an MFT 30 MFJ filing status
-
The Civil Penalty Name Line is automatically established using Form 8278 Items 1, 2, 3, 5, and 7 when there is an entity module.
-
Use IMFOL "E" for IMF and BMFOL "E" for BMF to verify there is an entity module for non-filers.
-
When there is not an entity module complete Form 2363 to create an entity, Trans. Code 000. Complete the name, address, and EIN or SSN. Send to Centralized Case Processing (CCP) two weeks before closing the case to CCP.
-
-
There are four categories of penalties addressed in this IRM subsection. They are as follows:
-
Preparer penalties and actions to pursue injunction
-
Promoter penalties and action to pursue injunction
-
Material advisor penalties
-
Failure to disclose reportable transaction
-
-
Preparer penalty sections and action to enjoin are:
-
IRC 6694, Understatement of Taxpayer's Liability by Tax Return Preparer
-
IRC 6695, Other Assessable Penalties With Respect to the Preparation of Tax Returns for Other Persons
-
IRC 6701, Penalties for Aiding and Abetting Understatement of Tax Liability
-
IRC 6713, Disclosure or Use of Information by Preparers of Returns
-
IRC 7407, Action to Enjoin Tax Return Preparers
-
-
Promoter penalty Internal Revenue Code sections and action to enjoin are:
-
IRC 6700, Promoting Abusive Tax Shelters, Etc.
-
IRC 6701, Penalties for Aiding and Abetting Understatement of Tax Liability.
-
IRC 7408, Actions to Enjoin Specified Conduct Related to Tax Shelters and Reportable Transactions.
-
-
Material advisor penalties are IRC 6707, Failure to Furnish Information Regarding Reportable Transactions, and IRC 6708, Failure to Maintain Lists of Advisees With Respect to Reportable Transactions.
-
Review IRM 20.1.6.22, Third Party Contacts - IRC 7602(c).
-
Estate and gift tax attorneys, LB&I, SB/SE, and TE/GE examiners should determine if tax return preparer penalties are warranted. The determination is based on all the facts and circumstances of the case including both oral testimony and written evidence developed during the examination process of the tax return prepared by the tax return preparer for their client.
-
Campus examination operations return preparer scheme referral procedures are in IRM 4.19.10.6, Return Preparer Scheme Identification.
-
Determining whether or not to proceed with a preparer penalty investigation is documented on the penalty leadsheet of the examination return preparer’s client case file. The penalty leadsheet for SB/SE Examination is Workpaper 300-1-1. Estate and gift tax examiners should use the penalty leadsheet in the Notebook Job Aid. Other BUs may use a functional equivalent. This leadsheet documents whether a return preparer penalty was considered. Disclosure guidelines preclude reference to an examination of another taxpayer in the return preparer’s client case file. When the determination is made that the return preparer may be responsible for the understatement of tax the response in the Workpaper 300-1-1 or its functional equivalent under the Preparer Section is to check "yes" in the box "Consider Penalty." Examiners must discuss their recommendations with their manager and secure managerial approval before initiating a return preparer penalty investigation.
Note:
Campus examination employees will document their return preparer penalty determination on Form 4700, Examination Workpapers.
-
If the manager approves the penalty investigation, the separate penalty examination case will be controlled and established on Examination Returns Control System (ERCS). Form 5809, Preparer Penalty Case Control Card, for operating divisions using ERCS. Form 5809 is signed by the manager and retained in the preparer penalty case file.
Note:
TE/GE penalty investigations will be controlled and established on their RCCMS. Visit the TE/GE's RCCMS website at http://tege.web.irs.gov/templates/TEGEHOME.asp for preparer penalty investigation procedures.
-
This section includes:
-
IRC 6694(a), Understatement Due to Unreasonable Positions
-
IRC 6694(b), Understatement Due to Willful or Reckless Conduct
Note:
See Training Publication 26809-001, Return Preparer Penalties - IRC 6694 and IRC 6695 (Student Guide), Catalog Number 20189I, at http://core.publish.no.irs.gov/trngpubs/pdf/20189f09.pdf
-
-
Section 8246 of The Small Business Work Opportunity Tax Act of 2007 (SBWOTA) amended IRC 7701(a)(36), Tax Return Preparer, expanding the definition of tax return preparer for periods after May 25, 2007, to any person (including a partnership or corporation) who prepares for compensation, or who employs one or more persons to prepare for compensation, all or a substantial portion of a tax return or claim for refund.
-
For periods prior to May 26, 2007, the definition of a tax return preparer is limited to income tax return preparers.
-
Treas. Reg. 301.7701–15(a) and various revenue rulings provide information on the definition of a tax return preparer, including "nonsigning preparers."
-
Treas. Reg. 301.7701–15(f) provides guidance on persons who are not tax return preparers.
-
See Lesson 1 of Training Publication 26809-001, Return Preparer Penalties - IRC 6694 and IRC 6695, Catalog Number 20189I. at http://publish.no.irs.gov/cat12.cgi?request=CAT1&=20189f for additional information.
-
Nonsigning tax return preparer
-
A nonsigning preparer who prepares a schedule or entry or portion that constitutes a substantial portion of the return may be considered a tax return preparer.
-
In making the decision as to what constitutes a "substantial portion," examiners should compare the length, complexity, and tax liability or refund of the entity, schedule, or portion of the return or claim of refund prepared by the non-signing preparer to the length, complexity, and tax liability or refund of the return or claim for refund as a whole. To determine whether an individual is a nonsigning tax return preparer, see Treas. Reg. 301.7701- 15(b)(2) and (3).
-
-
See IRC 7701(a)(36)(B)(iv) explanation regarding an exception to the definition of a tax return preparer
-
Prior to January 1, 2009, regulations encompassed a "one preparer per firm" rule that treated the signing preparer as the preparer subject to the IRC 6694 penalty. Under the prior regulations, if there is no signer in a firm, the individual with overall supervisory responsibility for the advice given by the firm with respect to the return or claim is the non-signer subject to penalty.
-
After December 31, 2008, Treas. Reg. 1.6694-1(b) changed the rule under previous regulations. In the course of identifying the individual who is primarily responsible for the position, the IRS may advise multiple individuals within the firm that it may be concluded that they are the individual within the firm who is primarily responsible for the position. A penalty, however, may only be assessed against the individual in the firm who is the primarily responsible tax return preparer. See Treas. Reg. 301.7701-15(b)(3).
-
For years after December 31, 2008, Treas. Reg. 1.6694-2(a)(2) provides that corporations, partnerships, and other firms that employ a tax return preparer may be subject to a penalty under IRC 6694(a).
A firm that employs a tax return preparer subject to the penalty under IRC 6694 (or a firm in which the individual tax return preparer is a partner, member, shareholder, or other equity holder) is also subject to the penalty if, and only if:
-
One or more members of the principal management (or principal officers) of the firm or a branch office participated in or knew of the conduct proscribed by IRC 6694(a);
-
The corporation, partnership, or other firm entity failed to provide reasonable and appropriate procedures for review of the position for which the penalty is imposed; or
-
The corporation, partnership, or other firm entity disregarded its reasonable and appropriate review procedures through willfulness, recklessness, or gross indifference (including ignoring facts that would lead a person of reasonable prudence and competence to investigate or ascertain) in the formulation of the advice, or the preparation of the return or claim for refund, that included the position for which the penalty is imposed.
-
-
Rev. Proc. 2009-11Section 3, Returns and Claims for Refund Subject to the Section 6694 Penalty, Identifies categories of returns to which the penalties under IRC 6694 applies. The categories are as follows:
-
Income Tax Returns – Subtitle A (e.g., Form 1040, U.S. Income Tax Return, Form 1041, U.S. Income Tax Return for Estates and Trusts, Form 1120, U.S. Corporation Income Tax Return)
-
Estate and Gift Tax Returns – Subtitle B (e.g., Form 706, U.S. Estate Tax Return and Form 709 , Unites States Gift (and Generation - Skipping Transfer) Tax Return
-
Employment Tax Returns – Subtitle C (e.g., Form 940, Employer's Annual Federal Unemployment (FUTA) Tax Return, Form 941, Employer's Quarterly Federal Tax Return, Form 943, Employer's Annual Tax Return for Agricultural Employees)
-
Miscellaneous Excise Tax Returns – Subtitle D (e.g., Form 720, Quarterly Federal Excise Tax Return, Form 2290, Heavy Highway Vehicle Use Tax Return)
-
Alcohol, Tobacco, and Certain Other Excise Taxes – Subtitle E (e.g., Form 8725, Excise Tax on Greenmail )
Note:
Rev. Proc. 2009-11 obsoletes Notice 2008-12 and Notice 2008-46. Rev. Proc. 2009-11 modifies and supersedes the lists of forms in Notice 2008-13.
-
-
Pre-SBWOTA, Prior to May 26, 2007 – Income Tax Returns
-
For income tax returns and claims for refund filed before May 26, 2007 if:
(i) Any part of an understatement of liability with respect to an income tax return or claim for refund was due to a position for which there was not a realistic possibility of being sustained on its merits, and
(ii) A person who is an income tax return preparer with respect to that return or claim for refund knew (or reasonably should have known) of the position, and
(iii) The position was not disclosed as provided in IRC 6662(d)(2)(B)(ii), or was frivolous. -
Prior to May 26, 2007 the penalty was $250.
Note:
The return preparer penalty, unless timely extended using Form 872-D, Consent to Extend the Time on Assessment of Tax Return Preparer Penalty, must be assessed within three years after the later of the due date or the income tax return was filed. Examples:
(i) The IRC 6694(a) penalty statute date for an income tax return filed May 25, 2007 is May 25, 2010, unless extended using Form 872-D.
(ii) The IRC 6694(a) return preparer statutes can only be extended using Form 872-D executed by the return preparer (or appropriate power of attorney (POA).
(iii) Extending the statute of the underlying client of the return preparer does not extend the statute for the return preparer penalty. -
-
Post-SBWOTA, After May 25, 2007:
a) SBWOTA both increased the penalty amount under IRC 6694(a) and made it applicable with respect to all tax returns, amended returns and claims for refund, including estate tax returns and gift tax returns, generation-skipping transfer tax returns, employment tax returns, and excise tax returns. SBWOTA and Tax Extenders and Alternative Minimum Tax Relief Act (TEAMTRA) also changed the standards of conduct that return preparers must meet in order to avoid imposition of the IRC 6694(a) penalty. The preparer penalty under IRC 6694(a) applies to tax returns and claims for refund filed after to May 25, 2007, if:
b) There is an understatement of taxpayer’s liability due to a unreasonable position; and either
(i) The position was properly disclosed, but there was no reasonable basis for the position, or
(ii) The position was not properly disclosed and there was not substantial authority for the position.
c) SBWOTA increased the penalty applicable to IRC 6694(a), Understatement Due to Unreasonable Positions, to the greater of $1,000 or 50 percent of the income derived (or to be derived) by the tax return preparer with respect to returns, amended returns and claims for refund prepared after May 25, 2007.
-
The standard for disclosed position is reasonable basis.
-
The standard for positions that are not disclosed is substantial authority if the position is not a tax shelter or a reportable transaction to which IRC 6662A, Imposition of Accuracy-related Penalty on Understatements with Respect to Reportable Transactions, applies.
-
"Reasonable basis" has the same meaning as in Treas. Reg. 1.6662-3(b)(3) or any successor provision of the accuracy-related penalty regulations.
-
Reasonable basis is a relatively high standard of tax reporting, that is, significantly higher than not frivolous or not patently improper. The reasonable basis standard is not satisfied by a return position that is merely arguable or that is merely a colorable claim. A return position is reasonable when using one or more of the authorities set forth in Treas. Reg. 1.6662-4(d)(3)(iii) (taking into account the relevance and persuasiveness of the authorities, and subsequent developments).
Note:
Lesson 2 of Training Publication 26809-001 provides further guidance on this issue. The website address is http://core.publish.no.irs.gov.trngpubs/pdf/20189f09.pdf
-
The substantial authority standard is less stringent than the more likely than not standard (the standard that is met when there is a greater 50- percent likelihood of the position being upheld), but more stringent than the reasonable basis standard as defined in Treas. Reg. 1.6662-3(b)(3) and Treas. Reg. 1.6662-4(d)(2).
-
For tax shelters and reportable transactions to which IRC 6662A, Imposition of Accuracy-related Penalty on Understatements with Respect to Reportable Transactions, applies see IRM 20.1.6.4.10, Tax Shelters and Reportable Transactions.
-
Notice 2007-54 I.R.B. 2007-27, and Notice 2008-11 I.R.B. 2008-3 provided transitional relief for all returns, amended returns, and refund claims due on or before December 31, 2007, to advice given before December 31, 2007, and 2007 employment and excise tax returns due on or before January 31, 2008 that are filed after May 25, 2007. Also, see Notice 2009-5, I.R.B. 2009-3, for further information.
Note:
Treasury Decision (T.D.) 9436 effective December 22, 2008, obsoletes Notice 2007-54 and Notice 2008-11. The T.D. is the final regulations implementing changes to return preparer legislation in 2007 and 2008.
-
Signing tax return preparers - disclosure of a position for which there is a reasonable basis but for which there is not substantial authority is adequate if the tax return preparer meets any of the following standards:
-
The position is disclosed in accordance with Treas. Reg. 1.6662-4(f) on
(i) A properly completed and filed Form 8275, Disclosure Statement, or Form 8275-R, Regulation Disclosure Statement, as appropriate, or
(ii) On the tax return in accordance with the annual revenue procedure described in Treas. Reg. 1.6662-4(f)(2);
-
The tax return preparer provides the taxpayer with the prepared tax return that includes the disclosure in accordance with Treas. Reg. 1.6662-4(f); or
-
For returns or claims for refund that are subject to penalties pursuant to IRC 6662, Imposition of Accuracy-related Penalty on Understatements, other than the accuracy-related penalty attributable to a substantial understatement of income tax under IRC 6662(b)(2) and (d):
(i) The tax return preparer advises the taxpayer of the penalty standards applicable to the taxpayer under IRC 6662, Imposition of Accuracy-related Penalty on Understatements
(ii) The tax return preparer must also contemporaneously document the advice in the tax return preparer’s files.
-
-
Nonsigning tax return preparers - disclosure of a position for which there is a reasonable basis standard but does not satisfy the substantial authority standard is adequate if the tax return preparer meets any of the following standards:
-
The position is disclosed in accordance with Treas. Reg. 1.6662-4(f) on
(i) A properly completed and filed Form 8275, Disclosure Statement, or Form 8275-R, Regulation Disclosure Statement, as applicable, or
(ii) On the return in accordance with an annual revenue procedure described in Treas. Reg. 1.6662-4(f)(2).
-
Advice to taxpayers by nonsigning tax return preparers:
(i)The tax return preparer advises the taxpayer of any opportunity to avoid penalties under IRC 6662, Imposition of Accuracy-related Penalty on Understatements With Respect to Reportable Transactions, that could apply to the position, if relevant, and of the standards for disclosure to the extent applicable.
(ii) The tax return preparer must also contemporaneously document the advice in the tax return preparer’s files. The contemporaneous documentation should reflect that the affected taxpayer has been advised by a tax return preparer in the firm of the potential penalties and the opportunity to avoid penalty through disclosure.
-
Advice to another tax return preparer by nonsigning tax return preparer:
(i) The tax return preparer advises the other tax return preparer that disclosure under IRC 6694(a) may be required.
(ii) The tax return preparer must also contemporaneously document the advice in the tax return preparer’s files.
(iii) The contemporaneous documentation should reflect that the tax return preparer outside the firm has been advised that disclosure under IRC 6694(a) may be required.
(iv) If the advice is to another non-signing tax return preparer within the same firm, contemporaneous documentation is satisfied if there is a single instance of contemporaneous documentation within the firm. See Treas. Reg. 1.6694-2(d)(3)(ii)(B).
-
-
See Treas. Reg. 301.7701–15(b)(2) for definition of nonsigning tax return preparer.
-
Notice 2009-5 provides that TEAMTRA’s standard of more likely than not for tax shelters and reportable transactions applies for taxable years ending after October 3, 2008.
-
It is reasonable to believe that positions have a "more likely than not" chance of being upheld on their merits if a preparer has:
(i) Analyzed the pertinent facts and authorities; and
ii) Concluded, in good faith, that there is greater than 50 percent likelihood that the tax treatment will be upheld if the IRS challenges it. -
The analysis prescribed by Treas. Reg. 1.6662-4(d)(3)(ii) (or any successor provision) for purposes of determining whether substantial authority is present applies for purposes of determining whether the more likely than not standard is satisfied. Whether a tax return preparer meets this standard will be determined based upon all facts and circumstances, including the tax return preparer’s due diligence.
-
Notice 2009-5 also provides an interim compliance rule for tax shelter transactions that are not listed or otherwise reportable under IRC 6662A, Imposition of Accuracy-related Penalty on Understatements with Respect to Reportable Transactions. A position will not be deemed an "unreasonable position" if there is substantial authority for the position and the tax return preparer advises the taxpayer of the penalty standards applicable to the taxpayer.
(i)These interim compliance rules do not apply to a position, described in IRC 6662A that is a reportable transaction with a significant purpose of federal tax avoidance or evasion or a listed transaction.
-
-
The penalty under IRC 6694(a) will not be imposed if, considering all the facts and circumstances, it is determined that the understatement was due to reasonable cause and the tax return preparer acted in good faith. (See Treas. Reg. 1.6694-2(e)). A tax return preparer will be found to have acted in good faith when the tax return preparer relied on the advice of a third party who is not in the same firm as the tax return preparer and who the tax return preparer had reason to believe was competent to render the advice. The advice may be written or oral, but in either case the burden of establishing that the advice was received is on the tax return preparer. A tax return preparer is not considered to have relied in good faith if—
-
(i) The advice is unreasonable on its face;
-
(ii) The tax return preparer knew or should have known that the third party advisor was not aware of all relevant facts; or
-
(iii) The tax return preparer knew or should have known (given the nature of the tax return preparer's practice), at the time the tax return or claim for refund was prepared, that the advice was no longer reliable due to developments in the law since the time the advice was given.
-
-
The other factors to consider are:
-
(i) Nature of the error causing the understatement. Whether the error resulted from a provision that was so complex, uncommon, or highly technical that a competent preparer of returns or claims of the type at issue reasonably could have made the error. The reasonable cause and good faith exception does not apply to an error that would have been apparent from a general review of the return or claim for refund by the preparer.
-
(ii) Frequency of errors. Whether the understatement was the result of an isolated error (such as an inadvertent mathematical or clerical error) rather than a number of errors. Although the reasonable cause and good faith exception generally applies to an isolated error, it does not apply if the isolated error is so obvious, flagrant or material that it should have been discovered during a review of the return or claim. Furthermore, the reasonable cause and good faith exception does not apply if there is a pattern of errors on a return or claim for refund even though any one error, in isolation, would have qualified for the reasonable cause and good faith exception.
-
(iii) Materiality of errors. Whether the understatement was material in relation to the correct tax liability. The reasonable cause and good faith exception generally applies if the understatement is of a relatively immaterial amount. Nevertheless, even an immaterial understatement may not qualify for the reasonable cause and good faith exception if the error or errors creating the understatement are sufficiently obvious or numerous.
-
(iv) Preparer's normal office practice. Whether the preparer's normal office practice, when considered together with other facts and circumstances, such as the knowledge of the preparer, indicates that the error in question would rarely occur and the normal office practice was followed in preparing the return or claim in question. Such a normal office practice must be a system for promoting accuracy and consistency in the preparation of returns or claims and generally would include, in the case of a signing preparer, checklists, methods for obtaining necessary information from the taxpayer, a review of the prior year's return, and review procedures. Notwithstanding the above, the reasonable cause and good faith exception does not apply if there is a flagrant error on a return or claim for refund, a pattern of errors on a return or claim for refund, or a repetition of the same or similar errors on numerous returns or claims.
-
-
SBWOTA increased the IRC 6694(a) penalty for understatements due to unreasonable positions from $250 to the greater of $1,000 or 50% of the income derived (or to be derived) by the tax return preparer from the preparation of a return or claim with respect to which the penalty was imposed. Examiners calculating the penalty using 50% of the income derived (or to be derived) by the tax return preparer from the preparation of a return or claim must elevate the calculation determination through his or her manager to the Return Preparer Functional Coordinator. For SB/SE Examination, the Area Preparer Coordinator is used in lieu of the Return Preparer Functional Coordinator. The Coordinator will then consult with the appropriate local Counsel contact person.
-
Standard of conduct for IRC 6694(b) remains the same for both prior and post SBWOTA.
-
There was an understatement. The penalty under IRC 6694(b) is imposed when:
-
Any part of the understatement was due to a willful attempt by an tax return preparer; or
-
Reckless or intentional disregard of rules or regulations by an tax return preparer.
-
-
Prior to SBWOTA, IRC 6694(b) was applied only to income tax return preparers.
-
Under IRC 7491(c) the Internal Revenue Service bears the burden of production in any court proceeding with respect to the liability of any individual for a penalty. Under IRC 7427, Tax Return Preparers, the Internal Revenue Service bears the burden of proof on the issue of whether the preparer willfully attempted to understate the tax liability.
-
Reckless conduct is a highly unreasonable omission or misrepresentation involving an extreme departure from the standards of ordinary care that a practitioner should observe under the circumstances.
-
Following are examples of willful or reckless conduct from Treas. Reg. 1.6694-3(d):
-
(i) A taxpayer provided a preparer with detailed check registers reflecting personal and business expenses. One of the expenses was for domestic help, and this expense was identified as personal on the check register. The preparer knowingly deducted the expenses of the taxpayer's domestic help as wages paid in the taxpayer's business. The preparer is subject to the penalty under IRC 6694(b).
-
(ii) A taxpayer provided a preparer with detailed check registers to compute the taxpayer's expenses. However, the preparer knowingly overstated the expenses on the return. After adjustments by the examiner, the tax liability increased significantly. Because the preparer disregarded information provided in the check registers, the preparer is subject to the penalty under IRC 6694(b).
-
-
SBWOTA increased the IRC 6694(b) penalty to the greater of $5,000 or 50 percent of the income derived (or to be derived) by the tax return preparer with respect returns, amended returns, and claims for refund prepared on or after May 26, 2007.
-
If both IRC 6694(a) and IRC 6694(b) penalties apply to a tax return preparer, the IRC 6694(b) penalty amount must be reduced by the IRC 6694(a) penalty amount per IRC 6694(b)(3), Reduction in Penalty.
-
Therefore, examiners should ensure that the combined assessment of IRC 6694(a) and IRC 6694(b) penalties against a preparer do not exceed the greater of $ 5,000 or 50 percent of the income derived (or to be derived) by the tax return preparer with respect to returns, amended returns, and claims for refund prepared on or after May 26, 2007.
-
Examiners calculating the IRC 6694(b) penalty using 50 percent of the income derived (or to be derived) by the tax return preparer from the preparation of a return or claim must elevate the calculation determination through his or her manager to the Return Preparer Functional Coordinator. The Coordinator will then consult with the appropriate local Counsel contact person.
-
See IRM 20.1.6.12, Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR).
-
See IRM 20.1.6.21, Statute Of Limitations.
-
Review IRM 20.1.6.22, Third Party Contacts - IRC 7602(c).
-
The IRC 6695 penalties only apply to tax return preparers. For the definition of "tax return preparer," see IRC 7701(a)(36), Tax Return Preparer.
-
IRC 6695(a) a $50 penalty will be asserted for each failure, with a maximum of $25,000 per preparer per calendar year;
-
IRC 6695(b) a $50 penalty will be asserted for each failure, with a maximum of $25,000 per preparer, per calendar year;
-
IRC 6695(c) no more than one penalty may be imposed with respect to a single return or claim for refund. A $50 penalty will be asserted for each failure, with a maximum of $25,000 per preparer, per calendar year;
-
IRC 6695(d) a $50 penalty will be asserted for each failure, with a maximum of $25,000 to any return period;
-
IRC 6695(e) the penalty is $50 for each failure to file a return as required by IRC 6060, Information returns of tax return preparers, and $50 for each failure to include a required item in the return. The maximum amount for any return period is $25,000;
-
IRC 6695(f) the penalty is $500 for each negotiated check. There is no maximum amount; and
-
IRC 6695(g) any return preparer who fails to comply with the EITC due diligence requirements of IRC 6695(g) will be charged a penalty for each failure. For any tax returns or claims for refund for tax years ending before December 31, 2011 the penalty is $100 per failure. There is no maximum amount. For any tax returns or claims for refund for tax years ending on or after December 31, 2011 the penalty is $500 per failure. There is no maximum amount.
-
-
The IRC 6695(a) penalty applies if the preparer fails to comply with IRC 6107(a), Furnishing Copy to Taxpayer. Under IRC 6107(a) a preparer is required to furnish a completed copy of the return or claim for refund to the taxpayer before (or at the same time) the return or claim for refund is presented to the taxpayer for signature.
-
This copy may be given to the taxpayer in any media, including electronic media that is acceptable to both the taxpayer and the tax return preparer.
-
In the case of an electronically filed return, a complete copy of a taxpayer's return or claim for refund consists of the electronic portion of the return or claim for refund, including all schedules, forms, pdf attachments, and jurats, which were filed with the IRS. The copy provided to the taxpayer must include all information submitted to the IRS to enable the taxpayer to determine what schedules, forms, electronic files, and other supporting materials have been filed with the return.
-
The copy, however, need not contain the identification number of the paid tax return preparer. The electronic portion of the return or claim for refund may be contained on a replica of an official form or on an unofficial form. On an unofficial form, however, data entries must reference the line numbers or descriptions on an official form. See Treas. Reg. 1.6107-1(a)(2).
-
-
If there is an employment arrangement between two or more preparers, the requirement to furnish a copy only applies to the person who employs (or engages) one or more other preparers. Similarly, if there is a partnership arrangement, the requirement to furnish a copy only applies to the partnership. See Treas. Reg. 1.6107-1(c).
-
The IRC 6695(a) penalties do not apply if the failure is due to reasonable cause and not due to willful neglect. Thus, the penalty for failure to furnish a copy to the taxpayer will not be imposed solely because:
-
A person is a non-signing preparer under Treas. Reg. 1.301.7701–15(b)(2) or
-
A person is a preparer under Treas. Reg. 1.301.7701–15(b)(3) on account of having prepared another return (e.g., the partnership return) which affects the amounts reported on the return in question (e.g., the partner's return).
-
-
The IRC 6695(a) penalty will also not be imposed where a preparer deletes certain information from the copy furnished to the taxpayer if the taxpayer holds an elected or politically appointed position with the government of the United States or a state or political subdivision thereof and who in order to carry out their official duties, has arranged their affairs so that they have less than full knowledge of the property they hold or of the debts for which they are responsible. See Treas. Reg. 1.6695-1(a)(2).
-
The IRC 6695(b) penalty applies if the preparer, who is required by regulations to sign the taxpayer’s return or claim for refund, fails to sign the return or claim for refund. Preparers must sign the return or claim for refund that are not signed electronically using the appropriate method prescribed by the Secretary after it is completed and before it is presented to the taxpayer for signature.
-
In the case of electronically signed tax returns, the signing tax return preparer need not sign the return prior to presenting a completed copy of the return to the taxpayer. The signing tax return preparer, however, must furnish all of the information that will be transmitted as the electronically signed tax return to the taxpayer contemporaneously with furnishing the Form 8879, IRS e-file Signature Authorization. The information may be furnished on a replica of an official form. The signing tax return preparer shall electronically sign the return in the manner prescribed by the Commissioner in forms, instructions, or other appropriate guidance. (Treas. Reg. 1.6695-1(b)(2)). See IRM 3.42.5.16.1.3 (5), Practitioner PIN Method, for signatures on electronically filed returns.
-
If the preparer required to sign the return or claim for refund is unavailable to sign, another preparer must review the return or claim for refund and then sign the return or claim for refund. If more than one preparer is involved in the preparation of the return or claim for refund, the preparer with primary responsibility for the overall substantive accuracy of the return/claim for refund is the preparer who must sign the return/claim for refund. Treas. Reg. 1.6695–1(b)(1).
-
-
A signing tax return preparer must provide a signature on returns or claims for refund that are filed on or after January 1, 2009. Rev. Proc. 2009-11, 2009-3 I.R.B. 313, Section 4.02, identifies categories of returns that the penalties under IRC 6695(b) should apply.
-
For a list of tax returns filed during the 2008 calendar year that must be signed to avoid a penalty under IRC 6695(b), see Rev. Proc. 2009-11, Section 3.
-
IRC 6695(b) no longer requires a manual signature. The IRS will permit tax return preparers to sign original returns, amended returns, or requests for filing extensions by rubber stamp, mechanical device, or computer software program. These alternative methods of signing must include either a facsimile of the individual preparer's signature or the individual preparer's printed name. Tax return preparers utilizing one of these alternative means are personally responsible for affixing their signatures to returns or requests for extension. (Notice 2004-54, 2004-2 C.B. 209). The signature requirement may also be satisfied if the preparer signs the completed return, makes a photocopy of the return, and the taxpayer signs and files the photocopy. (Rev. Rul. 78–370, 1978–2 C.B. 336).
-
If a preparer is physically unable to sign a return because of a temporary or permanent disability, the IRC 6695(b) penalty should not be imposed if the words "Unable to Sign" are printed, typed, or stamped on the preparer signature line. Also, the preparer’s name should be printed, typed, or stamped under the signature line after the return is completed, and before it is presented to the taxpayer for signature. (Rev. Proc. 79-7, 1979-1 C.B. 486).
-
A preparer is not required to affix an identification number to the taxpayer’s copy of the return. (Preamble to T.D. 9436, 2009-3 I.R.B. 268 at 270).
-
The IRC 6695(b) penalty does not apply if the failure was due to reasonable cause and not due to willful neglect. If a preparer asserts reasonable cause, the preparer should provide a written statement in substantiation of the preparer’s claim of reasonable cause. The penalty for failure to sign will not be imposed solely because:
-
A person is a non-signing preparer under Treas. Reg.1.301.7701-15(b)(2) or
-
A person is a preparer under Treas. Reg. 1.301.7701-15(b)(3) on account of having prepared another return (e.g., the partnership return) which affects the amounts reported on the return in question (e.g., the partner’s return).
-
-
The IRC 6695(c) penalty applies if the preparer fails to comply with IRC 6109(a)(4), Furnishing Identifying Number of Tax Return Preparer. Under IRC 6109(a)(4) and the regulations thereunder, the return or claim for refund must contain:
-
The identifying number of the preparer required to sign the return or claim for refund under IRC 6695(b); and
-
The identifying number of the partnership or employer (if there is a partnership or employment arrangement between two or more preparers).
-
-
A self-employed preparer can use either his/her social security number (SSN) or their PTIN for tax returns or refund claims prepared through December 31, 2010. If there is an employment arrangement or association, the employer’s identification number (EIN) and the individual preparer’s SSN or PTIN must be on the return. The preparer is not required to provide their SSN, PTIN or EIN on the copy furnished to the client.
-
Effective January 1, 2011 Tax Return Preparers must have a Preparer Identification Number (PTIN) to prepare returns. The PTIN is to be used as of January 1, 2011 as the Preparer Identifying Number. See PTIN Requirements for Tax Return Preparers at - http://www.irs.gov/taxpros/article/0,,id=210909,00.html?banner=PTIN and Treas. Reg 1.6109-2(d). If there is an employment arrangement or association the related EIN must also be on the tax return.
-
The IRC 6695(c), penalty does not apply if the failure was due to reasonable cause and not due to willful neglect. Thus, the penalty will not be imposed solely because:
-
A person is a non-signing preparer under Treas. Reg. 1.301.7701-15(b)(2) or
-
A person is a preparer under Treas. Reg. 1.301.7701-15(b)(3) on account of preparing another return (e.g., the partnership return) which affects the amounts reported on the return in question (e.g., the partner’s return).
-
-
IRC 6695(c) penalties will not be imposed against:
-
A preparer who is employed or engaged by a person who is also a preparer of the return or claim for refund; or
-
A preparer who is a partner in a partnership which is also a preparer of the return or claim for refund.
-
-
The IRC 6695(d) penalty applies if the preparer fails to comply with IRC 6107(b), Copy or List to Be Retained by Tax Return Preparer. Under IRC 6107(b) and the regulations thereunder, a preparer must:
-
Retain a completed copy of the return or claim for refund, or alternatively retain a record (by list, card file, electronically, or otherwise) of all the taxpayers, their taxpayer identification numbers, the taxable years, and the type of returns or claims for refund prepared.
-
Retain a record (by copy of the return/claim for refund or by a list, card file, electronically, or otherwise) of the name of the preparer required to sign the return or claim for refund under IRC 6695(b) for each return or claim for refund presented to the taxpayer.
-
Make such copy or list available for inspection upon request by the IRS for a three year period following the close of the return period. See IRC 6060(c), Return Period Defined.
-
-
If there is an employment arrangement between two or more preparers, the requirement to retain a copy or list only applies to the person who employs (or engages) one or more other preparers. Similarly, if there is a partnership arrangement, the requirement to retain a copy or list only applies to the partnership. Treas. Reg. 1.6107-1(c).
-
The IRC 6695(d) penalty does not apply if the failure was due to reasonable cause and not due to willful neglect. Thus, the penalty for failure to retain a copy or list will not be imposed solely because:
-
A person is a non-signing preparer under Treas. Reg. 1.301.7701-15(b)(2) or,
-
A person is a preparer under Treas. Reg. 1.301.7701-15(b)(3) on account of having prepared another return (e.g., the partnership return) which affects the amounts reported on the return in question (e.g., the partner’s return).
-
-
The IRC 6695(e) penalty applies if the preparer fails to comply with IRC 6060, Information Returns of Tax Return Preparers. Under IRC 6060(a), General Rule, and the regulations each person who employs (or engages) one or more tax return preparers must retain a record of the name, taxpayer identification number and place of work of each tax return preparer employed (or engaged) by him. For purposes of IRC 6060 a partnership is treated as the employer of the partners.
Note:
Maintaining the record is the filing.
-
The record may be in any form of documentation so long as it discloses on its face which individuals were employed (or engaged) as tax return preparers during that period.
-
The record must be retained and made available for inspection for a three-year period following the close of the return period to which it relates. The term "return period" means the twelve month period beginning on July 1st of each year.
-
If an tax return preparer is not employed by another preparer, such preparer is treated as his own employer for purposes of this penalty. Therefore, if a preparer is a sole proprietor, he/she must retain and make available a record with respect to himself/herself.
-
The IRC 6695(e) penalty does not apply if the failure was due to reasonable cause and not due to willful neglect.
-
The IRC 6695(e) penalty must be assessed within 3 years after the return or claim for refund was filed.
-
The IRC 6695(f) penalty applies if the preparer endorses or otherwise negotiates (directly or through an agent) a refund check issued to a taxpayer (other than the preparer). For exceptions see below. The preparer may not endorse or negotiate a check for a taxpayer even though the preparer was designated as the taxpayer’s representative on a Form 2848, Power of Attorney and Declaration of Representative.
-
A person in a business other than tax return preparation who fills out or reviews returns for its customers may be a preparer and, thus, subject to the IRC 6695(f) penalty if such person endorses or otherwise negotiates the customer’s refund check. See Rev. Rul. 86-55, 19861 C.B. 373 and Tiddy v. United States, 762 F. Supp. 122, (W.D.N.C., 1991).
-
Exceptions:
-
A tax return preparer will not be considered to have endorsed or otherwise negotiated a check as a result of having affixed the taxpayer’s name to a refund check for the purpose of depositing the check into an account in the name of the taxpayer or in the joint names of the taxpayer and one or more other persons (excluding the tax return preparer). Treas. Reg. 1.6695-1(f)(1).
-
In certain circumstances, a preparer-bank may cash a refund check and remit the cash to the taxpayer or may accept a refund check for deposit to the taxpayer’s account. A preparer-bank may:
i) Cash a refund check and remit all the cash to the taxpayer;
ii) Accept a refund check for deposit in full to the taxpayer’s account, provided the bank does not initially endorse or negotiate the check (unless the bank has made a loan to a taxpayer on the basis of the anticipated refund);
iii) Endorse a refund check for deposit in full to the taxpayer’s account pursuant to a written authorization of the taxpayer (unless the bank has made a loan to the taxpayer on the basis of the anticipated refund);
iv) Endorse or negotiate a refund check as part of the check clearing process after initial endorsement or negotiation. Treas. Reg. 1.6695-1(f)(2).
-
-
There is no reasonable cause exception to this penalty.
-
The IRC 6695(g) penalty applies if tax return preparer fails to comply with due diligence requirements with respect to determining eligibility for, or the amount of, the earned income tax credit (EIC).
-
Compliance visits with preparers to determine the due diligence requirement for the earned income credit are not third party contacts.
-
Under Treas. Reg. 1.6695-2(b), the preparer must comply with the following due diligence requirements for tax returns or claims for refund for tax years ending before December 31, 2011:
-
Complete an eligibility checklist. Preparers may use Form 8867, Paid Preparers Earned Income Credit Checklist, or their own form as long as it provides the same information.
-
Compute the credit using either the EIC worksheet in the Form 1040 , Form 1040A, U.S. Individual Income Tax Return, Form 1040EZ, Income Tax Return for Single and Joint Fliers With No Dependents, instructions, or Pub 596, Earned Income Credit, or their own worksheet that contains the same information.
-
Have no knowledge or reason to know that any information used to determine the taxpayer’s eligibility for the credit and the credit amount is incorrect. The preparer may not ignore the implications of information furnished to, or known by, the preparer, and must make reasonable inquiries if the information furnished to, or known by, the preparer appears to be incorrect, inconsistent, or incomplete.
-
Retain copies of Form 8867, Paid Preparers Earned Income Credit Checksheet, (or its successor), computation worksheet, and record of how and when the information used to determine eligibility and compute the EIC, was obtained by the preparer. The items must be retained for 3 years from June 30th following the date the return or claim was given to the taxpayer for signature. The items may be retained either on paper or electronically.
-
The tax return preparer must not know, or have reason to know, that any information used by the tax return preparer in determining the taxpayer’s eligibility for, or the amount of, the EIC is incorrect.
-
The tax return preparer may not ignore the implications of information furnished to, or known by, the tax return preparer, and must make reasonable inquiries if the information furnished to the tax return preparer appears to be incorrect, inconsistent, or incomplete.
-
A tax return preparer must make reasonable inquiries if a reasonable and well–informed tax return preparer knowledgeable in the law would conclude that the information furnished to the tax return preparer appears to be incorrect, inconsistent, or incomplete.
-
The tax return preparer must also contemporaneously document in the files the reasonable inquiries made and the responses to these inquiries. (Treas. Reg. 1.6695-2(b)(3)(i)).
-
-
Treas. Reg. 1.6695-2(b)(3)(ii) provides the following examples.
Example 1: A 22 year-old taxpayer wants to claim two sons, ages 10 and 11, as qualifying children for purposes of the EIC. Preparer A must make additional reasonable inquiries regarding the relationship between the taxpayer and the children as the age of the taxpayer appears inconsistent with the ages of the children claimed as sons.
Example 2: An 18 year-old female taxpayer with an infant has $3,000 in earned income and states that she lives with her parents. Taxpayer wants to claim the infant as a qualifying child for the EIC. This information appears incomplete and inconsistent because the taxpayer lives with her parents and earns very little income. Preparer B must make additional reasonable inquiries to determine if the taxpayer is the qualifying child of her parents and, therefore, ineligible to claim the EIC.
Example 3: Taxpayer asks Preparer C to prepare his tax return and wants to claim his niece and nephew as qualifying children for the EIC. Preparer C should make reasonable inquiries to determine whether the children meet EIC qualifying child requirements and ensure possible duplicate claim situations involving the parents or other relatives are properly considered.
Example 4: Taxpayer asks Preparer D to prepare her tax return and tells D that she has a Schedule C business, that she has two qualifying children, and that she wants to claim the EIC. Taxpayer indicates that she earned $10,000 from her Schedule C business, but that she has no expenses. This information appears incomplete because it is very unlikely that someone who is self-employed has no business expenses. D must make additional reasonable inquiries regarding taxpayer's business to determine whether the information regarding both income and expenses is correct.
-
The IRC 6695(g) penalty applies if tax return preparer fails to comply with due diligence requirements with respect to determining eligibility for, or the amount of, the earned income tax credit (EIC).
-
Compliance visits with preparers to determine the due diligence requirement for the earned income credit are not third party contacts.
-
Under Treas. Reg. 1.6695-2(b), the preparer must comply with the following due diligence requirements for tax returns or claims for refund for tax years ending on or after December 31, 2011
-
Treas. Reg. 1.6695-2(b)(1), Completion and submission of Form 8867, Paid Preparer's Earned Income Credit Checklist. The tax return preparer must complete Form 8867 or such other form and such other information as may be required by the Internal Revenue Service to be submitted in the manner required by forms, instructions, or other appropriate guidance.
-
The tax return preparer's completion of Form 8867 (or successor form) must be based on information provided to the tax return preparer or otherwise reasonably obtained by the tax return preparer.
-
The tax return preparer must either complete the earned income credit worksheet in the Form 1040 instructions or such other form and such other information as may be prescribed by the IRS or Otherwise record in one or more documents in the tax preparer's paper or electronic files the EIC computation, including the method and information used to make the computation.
-
The completion of the earned income credit worksheet or other permitted record must be based on information provided by the taxpayer to the tax return preparer or otherwise reasonably obtained by the tax return preparer.
-
The tax return preparer must not know, or have reason to know, that any information used by the tax return preparer in determining the taxpayer's eligibility for, or the amount of, the EIC is incorrect. The tax return preparer may not ignore the implications of information furnished to, or known by, the tax return preparer, and must make reasonable inquiries if the information furnished to the tax return preparer appears to be incorrect, inconsistent, or incomplete. A tax return preparer must make reasonable inquiries if a reasonable and well-informed tax return preparer knowledgeable in the law would conclude that the information furnished to the tax return preparer appears to be incorrect, inconsistent, or incomplete. The tax return preparer must also contemporaneously document in the files the reasonable inquiries made and the responses to these inquiries.
-
-
See IRM 20.1.6.5.7 (4) which list the four examples from Treas. Reg. 1.6695-2(b)(3)(ii).
-
See Treas. Reg. 1.6695-2(b)(4) regarding record retention.
-
See Treas. Reg. 1.6695-2(c) special rule for firms.
-
See Treas. Reg 1.6695-2(d) regarding exceptions to the penalty.