- 35.11.1.1 Supplementary Material
- Exhibit 35.11.1-1 Issues Requiring Associate Office Review
- Exhibit 35.11.1-2 Direct Filing and Service of Documents
- Exhibit 35.11.1-3 Transfer of Cases and Coordination of Issues with Division Counsel/Associate Chief Counsel (TE/GE)
- Exhibit 35.11.1-4 Jeopardy Assessment Cases — Notice of Jeopardy Assessment (Termination)
- Exhibit 35.11.1-5 Jeopardy Assessment Cases — Notice of Partial Abatement of Jeopardy Assessment
- Exhibit 35.11.1-6 Jeopardy Assessment Cases — Notice of Abatement of Jeopardy Assessment
- Exhibit 35.11.1-7 Munro Stipulation for Deficiency Cases
- Exhibit 35.11.1-8 Motion for Leave to File an Amendment to Answer — Munro — Increased Deficiency and Increased Penalties
- Exhibit 35.11.1-9 Answer — Petitioner's Burden of Proof: Complete Admissions and Denials
- Exhibit 35.11.1-10 Answer — Petitioner's Burden of Proof: Qualified Admissions and Denials
- Exhibit 35.11.1-11 Answer — Petitioner's Burden of Proof: Unnumbered and/or Unlettered Paragraphs
- Exhibit 35.11.1-12 Answer — Affirmative Allegations: Statute of Limitations — Fraud As Defense
- Exhibit 35.11.1-13 Answer — Affirmative Allegations: Statute of Limitations — 25 Percent Omission As Defense
- Exhibit 35.11.1-14 Answer – Affirmative Allegations: Statute of Limitations — Delinquency As Defense
- Exhibit 35.11.1-15 Answer — Affirmative Allegations: Statute of Limitations — Waivers or Consents As Defense
- Exhibit 35.11.1-16 Answer — Affirmative Allegations: Statute of Limitations — Waivers or Forms 872A As Defense
- Exhibit 35.11.1-17 Answer — Collateral Estoppel — Generally
- Exhibit 35.11.1-18 Answer — Affirmative Allegations: Fraud — Bank Deposit Method
- Exhibit 35.11.1-19 Answer — Affirmative Allegations: Fraud — Net Worth Method
- Exhibit 35.11.1-20 Answer — Affirmative Allegations: Fraud — Specific Items Method
- Exhibit 35.11.1-21 Answer — Affirmative Allegations: Fraud — Alternative Negligence and Delinquency Penalties
- Exhibit 35.11.1-22 Answer — Affirmative Allegations: Fraud — Collateral Estoppel As To Tax Year
- Exhibit 35.11.1-23 Answer — Affirmative Allegations: Transferee Liability
- Exhibit 35.11.1-24 Answer — Accumulated Earnings Tax: Inadequate Section 534(c) Statement
- Exhibit 35.11.1-25 Answer — Accumulated Earnings Tax Answer: Petitioner Failed to Submit Section 534(c) Statement
- Exhibit 35.11.1-26 Answer — Accumulated Earnings Tax Answer: Section 534 Letter Sent But No Response
- Exhibit 35.11.1-27 Declaratory Judgment Case: Administrative Record — Employee Plans (Stipulated Administrative Record)
- Exhibit 35.11.1-28 Declaratory Judgment Case: Employee Plans (Administrative Record Submitted Unagreed)
- Exhibit 35.11.1-29 Notice of Filing of Petition and Right to Intervene
- Exhibit 35.11.1-30 Notice of Filing of Petition and Right to Intervene (Deceased Nonpetitioning Spouse)
- Exhibit 35.11.1-31 Designation of Place of Trial
- Exhibit 35.11.1-32 Notice of No Objection
- Exhibit 35.11.1-33 Notice of Objection
- Exhibit 35.11.1-34 Motions to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction: Untimely Petition — Late United States Postmark
- Exhibit 35.11.1-35 Motions to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction: Untimely Petition — Private Postmeter
- Exhibit 35.11.1-36 Motions to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction: Untimely Petition — Illegible Postmark or Postmeter
- Exhibit 35.11.1-37 Motions to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction: No Statutory Notice
- Exhibit 35.11.1-38 Motions to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction: No Statutory Notice For Year Put In Issue
- Exhibit 35.11.1-39 Motions to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction: Unauthorized Representative of Deceased Person
- Exhibit 35.11.1-40 Motions to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction: Violation of Bankruptcy Code Stay Provision
- Exhibit 35.11.1-41 Table of Ninety Calendar Days
- Exhibit 35.11.1-42 Table of 150 Calendar Days
- Exhibit 35.11.1-43 Letter to Petitioner Regarding Late Filed Petition
- Exhibit 35.11.1-44 Motions Addressed to the Petition: Failure to State Claim — No Section 6673 Penalty Requested
- Exhibit 35.11.1-45 Motions Addressed to the Petition: Failure to State Claim — Claim for Penalties Under I.R.C. § 6673
- Exhibit 35.11.1-46 Motions Addressed to the Petition: Motion to Strike
- Exhibit 35.11.1-47 Motions Addressed to the Petition: Motion for a More Definite Statement or to Strike
- Exhibit 35.11.1-48 Tax Court Rule 37(c) Motion
- Exhibit 35.11.1-49 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Prosecution (Generally)
- Exhibit 35.11.1-50 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Prosecution: Nordstrom Procedure — Joint Petitioners
- Exhibit 35.11.1-51 Motion for Continuance of Trial (Example 1)
- Exhibit 35.11.1-52 Motion for Continuance of Trial (Example 2)
-
This section provides sample motions, letters, memorandums, and other documents used in Counsel’s litigation practice as described in Parts 34 through 36. These exhibits have been consolidated into a single chapter for ease of use.
Issues Requiring Associate Office Review
Certain issues require National Office (Associate office) review. There are issues that do not require Associate office review. An issue not listed among those requiring Associate office review is presumed not to require Associate office review. Court documents that contain no issues requiring Associate office review and that are not of a nature that requires Associate office review may be direct filed without Associate office review. See Exhibit 31.1.4–2. Defense and suit letters that do not contain issues on this list may be sent to the Department of Justice without Associate office review regardless of their classification as Standard or S.O.P. See CCDM 34.8.1.
It is imperative that all briefs and motions filed with the Tax Court and suit and defense letters sent to the Department of Justice reflect positions consistent with Service legal positions and policies and uphold the office’s reputation for the highest quality of written product. In order to ensure these attributes, certain documents involving novel or significant issues will be reviewed in Associate offices before filing with the Tax Court or transmission to the Department of Justice. The Associate Chief Counsel and Division Counsel will consult regarding the prompt removal of any pre-review requirement once the Service’s position has become sufficiently established that pre-review is no longer necessary.
Even though a case does not contain any of the issues described below, novel, unusual, or unique questions may be presented. It is the responsibility of the docket attorney and the reviewer in the field to identify those issues presenting such questions as to warrant review by the Associate offices, and to forward the brief for both prereview and review according to present procedures.
For those briefs, motions, and letters which are directly filed or sent to the Department of Justice by the field office, it is the responsibility of the field reviewer to ensure that they are correct factually and legally and of the highest quality.
Significant Issues that Require National Office Review
A case will be significant such that it requires Associate office review if it involves any of the following, regardless of the underlying code section or subject matter:
-
The validity of a regulation, temporary regulation, revenue ruling, or revenue procedure;
-
A proposed Treasury regulation;
-
An issue where the Government attempts to distinguish a regulation, proposed regulation, temporary regulation, revenue ruling, or revenue procedure;
-
A corporate tax shelter that is a listed transaction within the description in Treas. Reg. § 1.6011–4(b)(2).
-
A CIC issue or one that is the subject of a coordinated issue paper; or the case involves an international issue or a tax treaty issue;
-
A notice case;
-
A change in litigation position;
-
An argument contrary to Chief Counsel advice issued in the case;
-
Any statute or statutory amendment that has been enacted within the year preceding the filing date of the document or the due date of the letter to the Department of Justice;
-
Matters to be submitted to the Justice Department Office of Legal Counsel;
-
Nonfrivolous constitutional challenges to statutes, regulations, published guidance or Service administrative practices or any nonfrivolous assertion of the application of the Religious Freedom Restoration Act. Examples of frivolous constitutional issues that need not be reviewed are contained in The Truth About Frivolous Tax Arguments that can be found at http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-utl/friv_tax.pdf ; and
-
Issues appearing on the current Guidance Priority List of pending published guidance projects.
Code Sections that Require Review
In addition to the preceding matters, cases involving the following code sections require Associate office review:
-
Section 29 credit claimed for synthetic fuels derived from coal;
-
Section 66 relief from spousal liability in community property states;
-
Section 74(c) - the taxability of employment achievement awards;
-
Section 162 limited to deductibility of a payment of a shareholder’s expenses in the context of a corporate reorganization or buyout and unreasonable compensation in the context of mergers or buyouts or golden parachute payments;
-
Section 170 charitable contribution deductions involving quid pro quo issues for contributions to churches or religious organizations;
-
Section 274, unless limited purely to substantiation;
-
Section 385(c);
-
Sections 401 through 418 - the qualification of or deductions for employee benefit plans;
-
Sections 513, 543 and 613 regarding rents and royalties paid for oil and gas interests or whether payments to tax-exempt organizations constitute rent or royalties;
-
Sections 1311 through 1341 - mitigation and claim of right;
-
Section 3201(q) where the definition of wagering transaction is in dispute;
-
Sections 4001 through 4907 - excise taxes in chapters 31, 32, 33, 35, 36 subchapters B and D, 38, and 40;
-
Section 4958 - excess benefit transaction issues;
-
Section 6015 - spousal liability, except where relief from liability is requested solely under section 6015(b);
-
Section 6109 - the issuance or use of individual taxpayer identification numbers (ITINs); objections to the use of a dependent’s Social Security Number or Taxpayer Identification Number to claim a dependency exemption. See paragraph (16) below under Other Specific Issues Requiring Associate Office Review;
-
Section 6201(d) - a reasonable dispute with respect to an item of income reported on an information return;
-
Sections 6221 through 6234 (10). TEFRA partnership/S corporation procedural issues (certain TEFRA procedural motions may be filed directly);
-
Section 6330 and 6320 Collection Due Process - briefs, motions, and other Tax Court documents (including motions for summary judgment) raising novel or significant issues, stipulated decision documents not involving full concession by petitioner, and proposed joint motions to dismiss (Wagner motions);
-
Section 6332(d)(2) - penalty for failure to honor levy;
-
Section 6334(e) - the approval of the seizure of a principal residence;
-
Section 6404(c) - reversal of abatements based on bankruptcy discharges;
-
Sections 6601, 6611, and 6621(d) involving issues of restricted interest or global netting;
-
Section 6651(f) - the fraudulent failure to file penalty;
-
Section 6673(a)(2) - penalty against counsel for unreasonable and vexatious multiplication of proceedings in Tax Court;
-
Section 6721(e) and 6722(c) - penalties for intentional disregard of information reporting requirements;
-
Section 7430 - responses or briefs filed in opposition to taxpayers’ motions for attorneys’ fees under section 7430. For the requirements of such documents, see CCDM 35.10.1.1.1 for the rules regarding approval of settlements of section 7430 claims, see CCDM 35.10.1.1.2;
-
Section 7433(e) - only those involving requests for damages for violation of automatic stay or discharge injunction;
-
Section 7435 - civil damages for unauthorized enticement of information disclosure;
-
Section 7436 which provides for Tax Court jurisdiction over worker classification issues and whether the relief provided under section 530 of the Revenue Act of 1978 should apply to employers;
-
Section 7491 burden of proof issues;
-
Section 7502 limited to cases where the taxpayer argues timely mailing is timely filing based on Wood or Anderson ;
-
Section 7522 limited to arguments regarding the application of Shea v. Commissioner;
-
Section 7525 - the Tax Practitioner privilege;
-
Section 7602 - limited to summonses involving designated summonses, John Doe summonses, promoter summonses, summonses for audit or tax accrual workpapers, or where the Right to Financial Privacy Act or Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act has been argued in a suit to enforce or quash summons;
-
Section 7602(c) third-party contact issues; or
-
Section 7805(b) retroactive relief from the effect of a ruling or regulation.
Other Specific Issues Requiring Associate Office Review
In addition to the foregoing issues, the following specific issues not linked to code sections require Associate office review:
-
Collection issues involving disregarded entities or the collection of partnership tax liability from partners or the application of United States v. Craft -- collection of liability of one spouse from property held in tenancy by entireties;
-
The discharge exception under B. C. § 523(a)(1)(B)(i) where taxpayer files return after assessment and IRS partially abates liability (Hindenlang issue);
-
Employee independent contractor issues under section 530 of the Revenue Act of 1978 not involving section 7436;
-
The ex parte rules on communications with Appeals;
-
General receiver appointments requested by the Government;
-
Injunction, mandamus, or declaratory judgment sought by the Government;
-
Issue or claim preclusion (estoppel or res judicata) and equitable doctrines;
-
Privilege logs and similar documents identifying third parties, see CC Notice 2002–028;
-
Sanctions officer issues including misconduct on the part of Service employees or field counsel or opposing counsel, disqualification of counsel, referrals to the Director of Practice or other ethical issues in litigation;
-
Statistical sampling used by taxpayers to support a refund claim;
-
Suppression of evidence;
-
Taxpayers who are federal, state or local governments including Indian Tribal Governments;
-
Tort liability for attempting to defeat tax collection;
-
Tortious conversion of a tax lien;
-
Valuation issues - valuation of corporate stock with restrictive sales agreements, valuation of minority interest discounts or post-death events or valuation issues in the context of family limited partnerships; or
-
Any conscience-based objections to the use of a dependent’s Social Security Number (SSN) or Taxpayer Identification Number (TIN) to claim an exemption under Section 151. Objections may include that the requirement is contrary to the Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993 or any provision of the Constitution, such as the Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses of the 14th Amendment, the Due Process Clause of the 5th Amendment, or the Free Exercise and Establishment Clauses of the First Amendment, or cases in which the taxpayer states a belief that a SSN or TIN is the " mark of the beast."
The following is a list of documents that may be directly filed with the Tax Court. Any document not on this list must be forwarded to the Associate Chief Counsel (P&A), APJP, Branch 3, for review at least five working days prior to filing with the Tax Court. In addition, any document presenting issues listed on Exhibit 35.11.1–1, Issues Requiring Associate Office Review, is not to be direct filed prior to approval from the appropriate Associate office.
| Type of Document | Directly Served | Copies to Tax Court1 |
|---|---|---|
| Answers and Amendments | Yes | Orig. only |
| Motions to Amend Answers with Accompanying Amendments | Yes | Orig. & 4 (Motion) Orig. & 2 (Amendment) |
| Motion for Leave to File Answer Out of Time with Accompanying Answer | Yes | Orig. & 4 (Motion) Orig. & 2 (Answer) |
| Motion to Extend Time Within Which to Move or Answer | Yes | Orig. & 4 |
| Designation of Place of Trial | Yes | Orig. & 2 |
| Motion to Change Place of Trial | Yes | Orig. & 4 |
| Motion to Change Caption | Yes | Orig. & 4 |
| Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction | Yes | Orig. & 4 |
| Motion to Remove Small Tax Case Designation | Yes | Orig. & 4 |
| Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim Upon Which Relief Can Be Granted | Yes | Orig. & 4 |
| Motion to Strike | Yes | Orig. & 4 |
| Motion Under Rule 37(c) | Yes | Orig. & 4 |
| Respondent’s Request for Admissions | Yes | Orig. only |
| Stipulation for Discovery Deposition | No | Orig. & 1 |
| Respondent’s Response to Petitioner’s Request for Admissions | Yes | Orig. only |
| Stipulation for Trial | No | Orig. (with exhibits) & 1 |
| Motion to Compel Stipulation Under Tax Court Rule 91(f) | Yes | Orig. & 4 |
| Response to Order to Show Cause Under Tax Court Rule 91(f) | Yes | Orig. only |
| Motion to Consolidate | Yes | Orig. & 4 plus 1 for each additional docket in consolidated group |
| Motion to Sever from Consolidated Group | Yes | Orig. & 4 plus 1 for each additional docket in consolidated group |
| Joint Motions1 | No | Orig. & 4 |
| Motions Endorsed No Objection1 | Yes | Orig. & 4 |
| Notice of Proceeding in Bankruptcy | Yes | Orig. & 4 |
| Notice of Objection or No Objection | Yes | Orig. & 4 |
| Motion for Writ of Habeas Corpus Ad Testificandum | Yes | Orig. & 4 |
| Motion to Quash Subpoena | Yes | Orig. & 4 |
| Submission of Expert Witness Report | Yes | Orig. only |
| Motion to Continue | Yes | Orig. & 4 |
| Motion to Continue Hearing on Motion | Yes | Orig. & 4 |
| Motion to Restore to General Docket | Yes | Orig. & 4 |
| Motion to Calendar for Trial | Yes | Orig. & 4 |
| Respondent’s Status Report | Yes | Orig. & 2 |
| Joint Status Reports | No | Orig. & 2 |
| Motion for Summary Judgment or Partial Summary Judgment1 | Yes | Orig. & 4 |
| Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings1 | Yes | Orig. & 4 |
| Pretrial Memorandum1 | Yes | Orig. only |
| Motion to Extend Time to File Brief | Yes | Orig. & 4 |
| Stipulated Decision2 | No | Orig. & 2 |
| Respondent’s Computation for Entry of Decision and Proposed Decision Under Rule 1552,3 | Yes | Orig. & 2 (computation and decision each) |
Notes:
-
See Exhibit 35.11.1–1 for list of issues requiring Associate Chief Counsel Office review before document may be filed with the Tax Court and direct served.
-
Stipulated decisions and decisions accompanying Rule 155 computations in cases in consolidated groups are to be filed on the same date using separate captions for each decision (and computation statement). If decisions and computations in such cases cannot be filed simultaneously, a motion to sever the case or cases in which the decisions are being filed from the consolidated group should accompany the decision documents.
-
Rule 155 computations (agreed or unagreed) should not be directly filed if a substantial question exists on which assistance is required concerning how the court’s opinion should be reflected in the computation.
TE/GE HAS JURISDICTION OVER TE/GE TAXPAYERS REGARDLESS OF THE ISSUES INVOLVED AND OVER TE/GE ISSUES REGARDLESS OF THE TAXPAYER INVOLVED.
This exhibit identifies the more common TE/GE issues and shows when SBSE and LMSB managers must transfer a case to TE/GE or coordinate with TE/GE in the assignment or handling of these issues.
(1) IS THE TAXPAYER A TE/GE TAXPAYER?
General rule: Regardless of the issues, if a case involves an employee plan (EP); exempt organization (EO); tax exempt bond (TEB); federal, state, local government (FSLG), or Indian tribal government (ITG) taxpayer, call the Area Counsel (TE/GE) office and transfer the case.
Exception:
If a TE/GE taxpayer is in bankruptcy or is the subject of collection activity, do not transfer the case. Call the Area Counsel (TE/GE) office to coordinate case assignment or technical support.
(2) IS THE TAXPAYER AN LMSB, SBSE, OR WI TAXPAYER WITH ONE OR MORE TE/GE ISSUES?
General rule for sole issue: Transfer case to TE/GE if the sole issue is a TE/GE issue. The more common issues are shown below.
General rule for mixed issues: Call to coordinate if there are multiple issues with mixed non-TE/GE and TE/GE issues.
Exceptions:
-
Employment Tax cases: See WHETHER TO TRANSFER, COORDINATE OR SEEK TECHNICAL SUPPORT ON EMPLOYMENT TAX CASES.
-
Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC) and Individual Retirment Account (IRA) regular cases: Do not transfer. Call the Area Counsel (TE/GE) office to coordinate or for technical support.
-
EITC and IRA "S" cases: Do not transfer. There is no coordination requirement. The Area Counsel (TE/GE) office is available to provide technical support.
(3) TE/GE ISSUES
The following identifies the more common TE/GE issues and shows when SBSE and LMSB managers must transfer a case to TE/GE or coordinate with TE/GE on the assignment or handling of these issues. Consult the Code and Subject Matter Directory for a more complete list. If you have any questions on whether an issue is a TE/GE issue, call the Area Counsel (TE/GE) office to discuss.
-
Exempt Organizations: Sections 501–509, 6033 EO exemptions and requirements; §§ 511–514 UBIT; §§ 527, 4911,4912,4955 political activities and lobbying; § 529 qualified state tuition plans; § 530 education IRAs; §§ 4940–4948 private foundation excise taxes; § 4958 intermediate sanctions; § 6104 EO/EP disclosure; § 7428 EO declaratory judgments; § 7611 church audits; § 277 certain coops; Chapters 95 and 96 Presidential election campaign fund
-
Employee Plans: Sections 401–418 qualification of employee benefit plans; funding; taxation of employer and employee contributions; taxation of distributions; § 72(p) plan loans; § 72(t) early plan distributions; §§ 219, 408 SEPs, SIMPLEs; § 457 plans for state and local governments and tax-exempt entities; § 1042 sale of stock to ESOP or certain coops; §§ 4971–4981A EP excise taxes; § 7476 EP declaratory judgments
-
Executive Compensation: Section 83 annuities and property transferred in connection with performance of services; § 162 million dollar cap; §§ 280G & 4999 golden parachutes; §§ 421– 424 certain stock options; § 451 nonqualified deferred compensation
-
Health & Welfare: Section 79 group term life insurance; §§ 104–105 (except § 104(a)(2)) compensation for injuries and sickness, accident and health plans; §125 cafeteria plans; §§ 419/419A funded welfare benefit plans; § 501(c)(9) VEBAs; § 4980B COBRA; Chapter 98 HIPAA; Chapter 99 coal industry health benefits
-
Tax Exempt Bonds: Sections 103 & 141–150; tax-exempt bond issues can also arise under §§ 22, 25, 265(b), 1016(a)(6), 1394, 1397E, 1400A, 7871(c); § 7478 bond declaratory judgments
-
Employment taxes: Section 7436 worker classification/§ 530cases. See below for whether to transfer, coordinate or seek technical support on other employment tax and fringe benefit issues (including § 132, § 119; and accountable plan issues).
(4) WHETHER TO TRANSFER. COORDINATE OR SEEK TECHNICAL SUPPORT ON EMPLOYMENT TAX CASES
-
Cases To Transfer To TE/GE
-
Section 7436 worker classification/§ 530 cases docketed in Tax Court.
-
Also includes procedural questions relating to Notice of Determination
-
-
Refund cases (including erroneous refund cases) involving only employment tax issues designated for coordination below
-
-
Call TE/GE To Coordinate
-
Worker classification - all docketed and nondocketed cases except docketed § 7436 cases
-
Includes worker status; § 530; applicable tax rates; corporate officers; statutory employees
-
Also includes individual cases in which deductions or liability for SECA (self-employment tax) turn on worker classification
-
-
Employee leasing/three party wage payment issues - docketed and nondocketed cases
-
Includes which entity is employer; which entity must report, withhold, and deposit; payroll agents
-
Excludes § 6672 cases (see below)
-
-
Wage issues — docketed and nondocketed cases
-
Includes fringe benefits (such as §§132 and 119); accountable plan issues; back pay; deferred, stock-based, other executive compensation (§§83, 3121(v))
-
-
Employment issues (§3121(b)) –docketed and nondocketed cases
-
Excepted services, such as students, fishing crews, student nurses, certain government employment
-
-
Railroad retirement tax issues-docketed and nondocketed cases
-
Tips
-
All aspects, including liability, reporting, initiatives and compliance projects
-
-
Military benefits - docketed and nondocketed cases
-
Parsonage allowances-docketed and nondocketed cases
-
Public Official status/fees
-
Limited liability company/partnership issues — docketed and nondocketed cases
-
Applicability of SECA or FICA
-
Which party is liable
-
-
Self-employment Tax (SECA) issues
-
Status as independent contractor or employee
-
Definition of self-employment income
-
-
-
Call TE/GE If Novel Issue Or If Technical Assistance Is Needed
-
SECA issues
-
Reporting or computational issues
-
-
FICA, FUTA, RRTA reporting and deposits
-
Includes applicable penalties
-
Does not include issues concerning whether taxes apply (see above)
-
-
Section 6672 trust fund recovery penalty and § 3505
-
SBSE has primary jurisdiction
-
-
| [Letterhead] | |
| [Name and address of petitioner or petitioner’s counsel] |
|
| Re: [Petitioner] v. Commissioner Docket No. [docket no.] |
|
| Dear [name of petitioner or petitioner’s counsel]: | |
| I am the attorney responsible for handling your recently filed case in the United States Tax Court. The preliminary question raised is whether your petition was timely filed. If your petition was not timely filed, the Court has no choice but to dismiss it. If the petition is dismissed, you will be required to fully pay the tax, file a claim for refund with the Internal Revenue Service, and, if the refund claim is disallowed, contest the issues in the district court or the Court of Federal Claims. | |
| The problem arises because the Tax Court has indicated that your petition was postmeter marked on [date], a few days before the expiration of the 90-day filing period, but that the petition was received by the Court later than the ordinary delivery time for documents so mailed and postmarked by the U.S. Postal Service. However, if you will send me a letter stating that the petition was actually deposited in the mail before the last pickup from the mailbox on or before the 90th day and showing the time, place and circumstances of the mailing, I will rely on your representation and not raise the jurisdictional issue to the Court. For your convenience, I am enclosing a return self addressed envelope for this purpose. | |
| It is important that you respond immediately. [If a joint petition is involved, petitioners should be instructed that both should sign the letter.] After this preliminary procedural matter is resolved, you will have an opportunity to resolve your case on an informal basis with our Appeals office. That office will contact you and arrange a conference at a mutually convenient time. [Use of this paragraph would depend upon the circumstances of the case.] | |
| If you should have any questions, please feel free to write or call me at [telephone number]. | |
| Sincerely, | |







