AccessibilitySkip to Top NavigationSkip to Main ContentHome  |  Contact IRS  |  About IRS  |  Site Map  |  Español  |  Help  

6.731.1  Guidelines and Procedures

6.731.1.1  (07-01-2002)
Overview

  1. This IRM contains basic requirements for designating risk levels, investigating, and adjudicating suitability for employment or continued employment in the competitive service, outside the civil service register and excepted appointments. Outside the civil service register and the term "direct hire" are the same. The regulatory basis for this IRM is 5 CFR 731.

6.731.1.1.1  (07-01-2002)
Suitability Definition

  1. Suitability means a determination based on an individual’s character or conduct that may impact the efficiency of the Service by jeopardizing an agency’s accomplishment of its duties or responsibilities, or by interfering with or preventing effective service in the competitive or excepted position applied for or employed in, and determination that there is a statutory or regulatory bar to employment (5 CFR 330.604 (h)). Suitability is the sum of requirements for Government service concerning a person’s character, reputation, trustworthiness, and fitness, as it relates to the efficiency of the Service.

  2. An applicant may not be denied employment or consideration for employment except for such cause as will promote the efficiency of the Service.

6.731.1.1.2  (07-01-2002)
Efficiency of the Service Definition

  1. In determining if a person’s suitability will impact the efficiency of the Service, IRS offices must consider the following (see 5 CFR 731.202 (a)):

    1. Whether the conduct of the individual may reasonably be expected to interfere with, or prevent, efficient service in the position applied for or employed in;

    2. Whether the conduct of the individual may reasonably be expected to interfere with, or prevent, effective accomplishment by the employing agency of its duties or responsibilities; and

    3. Whether a statutory or regulatory bar prevents the lawful employment of the individual in the position in question.

6.731.1.2  (07-01-2002)
OPM Authority

  1. The Office of Personnel Management (OPM) has jurisdiction under 5 CFR 731 until March 30, 2002, to determine an individual’s suitability for employment in the competitive service. OPM maintains jurisdiction for 30% or more CPS veterans and falsification cases where there is evidence of material intentional false statement, description, or fraud in examination or appointment. Refer to TREAS-1 agreement 1.E.1.d. (i), (ii), (iii) found in IRM Exhibit 6.331.1-1. Issues for potentially disqualifying applicants for other Federal employment should be referred to OPM.

6.731.1.3  (07-01-2002)
Service Authority

  1. The head of each agency is delegated authority for adjudicating suitability for outside the civil service register, excepted service, and competitive appointment not subject to an investigation. The agency must apply the criteria outlined in 5 CFR 302.203 in making suitability determinations, and document case files as suitability or unsuitability based on the criteria in 5 CFR 302.203.

  2. Under 5 CFR 307.104, veterans appointed under Veterans Readjustment Appointments (VRA) in the excepted service have appeal rights of an adverse action to the Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB); however, non-preference eligibles do not have appeal rights until they are converted to the competitive service.

  3. The Service is responsible for the following four areas:

    1. Designating the risk levels of positions;

    2. Reviewing and investigating applications for disqualifying behavior or conduct;

    3. Applying the referral standards and meeting adjudication referral requirements when potential disqualifying information is identified; and

    4. Making appropriate basic suitability adjudications for entry into all positions.

6.731.1.4  (07-01-2002)
Authority of AWSS Personnel Officers

  1. When filling a competitive position, the appointing officer is responsible for determining that the candidate meets all of the qualification standards and requirements (including basic suitability) for the position. An applicant must be qualified and within reach before suitability determinations can be made. Determining a person’s suitability, however, is not the same as determining a person’s ability to fulfill the other qualification requirements of a job. Authority for suitability determinations for external employment as it relates to Exhibit 6.731.1-1 is delegated no lower than the Agency-Wide Shared Services (AWSS) Personnel Officer level. (A new delegation order [number to be determined] covering this authority will be issued at a future date.)
    Refer to Exhibit 6.731.1-1 and 5 CFR 332.406 for objecting to eligibles and for passing over a preference eligible on an OPM or Delegated Examining Unit (DEU) certificate. Under delegated examining, refer to 8.12D of the Delegated Examining Operations Handbook (DEOH) located at: www.opm.gov/deu.

6.731.1.4.1  (07-01-2002)
Vacancy Announcement Requirements

  1. All external vacancy announcements must contain the following statements:

    1. "Fingerprints will be required as part of the pre-employment process," and

    2. "Meeting this is a condition of employment."

6.731.1.4.2  (07-01-2002)
Time of Application Requirements

  1. At the time of accepting an application, the following items need to be adjudicated on the following ‘legal’ issues:

    1. Date of Birth. For most jobs age is not a factor. An applicant’s date of birth can be obtained when hired. Age is a factor for law enforcement and other positions with maximum entry ages and for those few jobs where there is a minimum age requirement.

    2. Citizenship. 5 CFR 338 prohibits noncitizens from both competing in a civil service examination and from being appointed to a position in the competitive service. Employment applications from noncitizens should not be accepted.

    3. Veterans Preference. Personnel offices have the discretion to determine at what stage in the hiring process they will require proof of veteran’s preference. Proof is absolutely necessary if the preference is used as a basis for acceptance of an application after closing date, or when positions are restricted to preference eligibles, or prior to final selection if the veteran was selected over other candidates based on their preference. Refer to TREAS-1 agreement, lE2j, found in IRM 6.331.1, Exhibit 6.331.1-1.

  2. Applicants must complete and sign the "Consent for Fingerprint Check" form which includes these statements:

    1. Your failure to complete the pre-appointment information on this form may mean that the required information cannot be obtained to determine your suitability and/or to conduct an investigation; and

    2. Without this information, a determination as to your suitability for Federal employment cannot be made and may result in you not being considered for employment.

  3. An applicant who refuses to submit fingerprints or who will not agree to a fingerprint check cannot be considered for employment. The application will be treated as an "incomplete" application and should be processed accordingly.

  4. An applicant must be informed of the investigative requirements of the position for which the applicant is being considered and that any false statements, financial or tax matter irregularities or any other derogatory information may be cause for separation or other administrative action of an adverse nature.

6.731.1.4.3  (07-01-2002)
Time of Certification

  1. Only qualified eligible applicants currently within reach of selection and cases involving potentially disqualifying suitability according to OPM’s suitability referral chart (Exhibit 6.731.1-2) need to be referred to OPM’s Adjudication Branch. Refer to Exhibit 6.731.1-1, 5 CFR 332.406, TREAS-1 agreement, lE2g(i) and 2i, and DEOH 8.12D for objecting to eligibles and for passing over a preference eligible on an OPM or Delegated Examining Unit (DEU) certificate.

6.731.1.4.4  (07-01-2002)
Time of Appointment

  1. At the time of appointment, the following items need to be adjudicated:

    1. Select Service Registration. Offices are required to adjudicate at the time of appointment that any male applicant born after December 31, 1959 is registered with Selective Service. Selective Service is considered a qualifications issue, and offices should follow the guidance provided in 5 CFR 300.701-707. The OF 306, "Declaration for Federal Employment" , (revised January 2001) has added questions concerning Selective Service Registration designed to aid in determining if non-registration was knowing and willful prior to making a final employment decision.

    2. Selection Documentation for Competitive Automated Recruitment System (or other automated systems) certificates: Enter the "EOD" (Entered on Duty) code for all selected candidates regardless of whether or not pre-employment requirements have been met. Also, enter an explanation in the comments field for the pending EOD such as "applicant selected on xx/xx/xx, EOD pending favorable fingerprint results" or a similar statement reflecting the individual circumstances.

    3. Selection Documentation for manual certificates: Annotate "A" (Selected) on the certificate with the statement "applicant selected on xx/xx/xx, EOD pending favorable fingerprint results" or similar comments reflecting the individual circumstances.

    4. Lower-Standing Candidates: Lower-standing candidates who have met pre-employment requirements (even if the higher-standing candidate would otherwise block selection) may still be selected. However, you must leave a position open to place the higher-standing selectee once pre-employment requirements have been met.

    5. Questionable Suitability: An objection must be filed with OPM if the suitability is questionable. Please refer to the "DEOH Section 8 — Certification Procedures, subsection 12 — Acting on the Certificate, paragraph D — Objections to Eligibles, and subparagraph a — Suitability Disqualifications" (DEOH 8.12Da) and access OPM’s lnvestigations Service web site at www.opm.gov/extra/investigate for guidance.

    6. Objection Results: If the IRS objection is sustained by OPM, change the action code for the applicant from "EOD" or "A" to "RS" (Removed from Certificate-Suitability) and reference the OPM document and date that sustains the objection. Release vacancy held for the selectee.

    7. Favorable results (no derogatory information): Annotate the certificate to show the actual date the selectee entered on duty, with an explanation for adjustments to that date. For example, comments should document selection date, EOD, and reason(s) for delay. This is particularly important for the audit trail, which needs to show that selections are made in proper order (higher-standing applicants are selected ahead of lower-standing applicants who would otherwise not have been within reach for selection).

    Note:

    When applicants are selected subject to completion of pre-employment requirements such as fingerprint processing, the certificate should be documented to reflect the selection and the pending action.

    Note:

    Retain the "EOD" entry or "A" notation, but update the comments to indicate "suitability objection sent to OPM on xx/xx/xx." Continue to leave a position open pending OPM’s decision.

    Note:

    The applicant’s name remains on the certificate but with the "RS" action code to indicate the sustained objection.

6.731.1.4.5  (07-01-2002)
Time of Enter-On-Duty

  1. IRS will not employ applicants in any of its offices unless the fingerprint checks have been completed. Refer to IRM 1.23.3, Background Investigations Guide, for further information regarding fingerprint policy and procedures.

  2. Applicants for employment who have not had their case dispositions completed may not be hired.

  3. Offices hiring contractor personnel must follow policy contained in IRM 1.23.2.2, Contractor Investigations.

  4. Reemployed annuitants must have a complete fingerprint check and results reviewed by management prior to entering on duty. No further investigation is warranted.

6.731.1.5  (07-01-2002)
Subject to Investigation

  1. OPM has jurisdiction for investigations on all applicants and appointees serving a one (1) year probationary period. OPM has jurisdiction on a limited basis for employees after one (1) year with respect to intentional false statement, deception, or fraud. This limited basis is contingent on the circumstances surrounding an individual case and the on-going investigation.

  2. All positions over 180 days are subject to an investigation, the scope of which depends on the risk level. Further information on position risk descriptions and associated required investigations are found in IRM 1.23.1.

  3. Positions involving a high degree of public trust require a more thorough investigation than do positions requiring only the finding that an applicant or an incumbent has the requisite suitability of character to hold Federal employment.

  4. Any review or investigation which yields adverse or derogatory information about an applicant, or an employee, requires a suitability determination.

  5. For national security investigations and contractor investigations, please refer to IRM 1.23.1 and 1.23.2.

6.731.1.6  (07-01-2002)
Risk and Sensitivity Levels

  1. Agency heads shall designate every competitive service position within the agency based on the documented duties and responsibilities of the position. Each position will be designated at the high, moderate, or low risk level depending on the position’s potential for adverse impact to the integrity and efficiency of the Service (5 CFR 731.106). The risk level is determined during the classification process. The risk level refers to the importance of a position towards completion of the agency’s mission, and the amount of damage that would be incurred if staffed with an unsuitable person.

  2. There are three other designations for risk required for national security positions. The designations for national security are:

    • Critical-Sensitive

    • Non-Critical Sensitive

    • Non-Sensitive

  3. Any employee in the Service who holds an active national security clearance must be designated as one of these levels. Additional information can be found in IRM 1.23.3.

6.731.1.6.1  (07-01-2002)
Risk Designation System

  1. Every competitive service position must be designated at a position risk level commensurate with the public trust responsibilities and attributes of the position as they relate to the efficiency of the Service. The suitability risk levels are ranked according to the degree of adverse impact on the integrity and efficiency of the Service that an unsuitable person could cause.

  2. Public Trust Positions are those which have the potential for action or inaction by their incumbents to affect the integrity, efficiency, or effectiveness of assigned Government activities. Potential adverse effect includes action or inaction which could diminish public confidence in the integrity, efficiency, or effectiveness of Government activities, whether or not actual damage occurs.

  3. Certain Government activities, by their nature, can be adversely affected by the action or inaction of most employees associated with the activity in any responsible capacity. Such activities include law enforcement, public safety and health, and collection of revenue. To determine position risk levels, a Risk Designation system is used to assure that positions are designated uniformly and consistently by Federal agencies.

6.731.1.6.2  (07-01-2002)
Suitability Position Risk Levels

  1. There are three suitability position risk levels, as follows:

    1. High Risk — Positions included are those that have the potential for exceptionally serious impact involving duties especially critical to the agency or a program mission with broad scope of policy or program authority, such as: policy development and implementation; higher level management assignments; or independent spokesperson or non-management positions with authority for independent action.

    2. Moderate Risk — Positions included are those which have the potential for moderate to serious impact on delivery of customer services to the public, such as: assistants to policy development and implementation; mid-level management assignments; non-management positions with authority for independent or semi-independent action; or delivery of service positions that demand public confidence or trust.

    3. Low Risk — Positions included are those that have the potential for limited impact on the agency’s mission and program responsibilities.

6.731.1.6.3  (07-01-2002)
Computer/ADP Risk Levels

  1. The Computer Security Act of 1987 (PL. 100-235) requires Federal agencies to identify each computer system that contains sensitive information. This Act also requires agencies to prepare a plan for the security and privacy of each system. Sensitive information is any information (the loss, misuse, or modification of which, or the unauthorized access to) that could adversely affect the national interest or the conduct of Federal programs, or the privacy to which individuals are entitled under section 552a of 5 U.S.C. (the Privacy Act), but which has not been specifically authorized under criteria established by an Executive Order or an Act of Congress to be kept secret in the interest of national defense or foreign policy. The computer/ADP risk levels and criteria are to be used as an integral part of Suitability Position Risk Designation Systems. In order to establish uniformity and objectivity, Computer/ADP risk designations must be made in a systematic manner.

6.731.1.6.4  (07-01-2002)
Position Designation Records

  1. Each position will have a complete position designation record or agency equivalent. Personnel offices will maintain the record of public trust suitability designations, and copies should be maintained by Security Offices as well.

  2. Position designation records are subject to review by OPM through either periodic appraisal of agency suitability programs or on a case-by-case basis to assure that agencies are considering all pertinent factors when designating positions relative to the efficiency of the Service.

6.731.1.7  (07-01-2002)
Suitability Determination Bases

  1. Suitability determinations require the exercise of sound judgment and discretion. To ensure a complete and fair review of each case, suitability determinations must be based on consideration of all information available. All information includes mitigating factors surrounding or contained in the adverse or derogatory information, as well as the extent of rehabilitation in evidence.

6.731.1.7.1  (07-01-2002)
Suitability Referral Process

  1. IRS offices should refer to the suitability referral chart in Exhibit 6.731.1-2 and OPM’s web site www.opm.gov/extra/investigate to determine which issues or combination of issues warrant referral to OPM’s adjudication office for suitability review and adjudication. The suitability referral chart is based on OPM’s issue characterization chart. IRS has also established additional policy based upon the mission of the Service and specific nexus considerations for hiring in Remittance Processing Functions. IRS offices should refer to the policy statement PPD-0300-01S01 that is found in Exhibit 6.731.1-3 for further guidance.

  2. IRS offices should refer to the Exhibit 6.731.1-4 for procedures on referring suitability adjudication cases to OPM.

6.731.1.7.2  (07-01-2002)
Suitability Adjudication

  1. The suitability adjudication procedures require that adjudications be made with reference to the person’s:

    1. Basic suitability for Federal employment;

    2. Suitability for employment in a specific position in terms of the position’s sensitivity; and

    3. Suitability for employment in a specific position in terms of the performance requirements of the position.

6.731.1.7.3  (07-01-2002)
Suitability Adjudication Due Process by OPM

  1. When IRS refers suitability issues to OPM, OPM prepares a Notice of Proposed Action (5 CFR 731.402) which:

    1. States reason, specifically and in detail;

    2. Gives right to respond in writing and set time limit to do so;

    3. If an employee, gives right to respond orally;

    4. Gives rights to request "materials relied upon" ; and

    5. If employed, IRS is also notified of the proposed action and given an opportunity to respond.

  2. When applicants answer the Notice of Proposed Action, the following apply (5 CFR 73 1.403):

    1. The applicant may submit a written response, including affidavits up to 30 days from date of notice;

    2. The applicant may be represented by a representative of choice if designated in writing;

    3. If employed, and an oral response is requested, OPM determines time and place; and

    4. IRS will have 30 days from the date of proposed action to respond.

  3. When OPM makes a decision (5 CFR 731.404), the following apply:

    1. OPM explains decision, including any debarment action;

    2. The individual is given their appeal rights to MSPB;

    3. Any removals are effective 30 days following the date of the decision. (Pay status during the appeal process is up to the agency); and

    4. In certain situations, either party may file a Petition For Review (PFR) of the initial decision to the full Board, and subsequently to the Federal Courts.

  4. 5 CFR 315 Actions are used to remove appointees during their probationary year as follows:

    1. For conduct before appointment (such as intentional falsification of application forms or other pre-appointment documents), the probationer is entitled to notice in advance, a specific and detailed statement of the reasons, the right to reply, consideration of his/her reply, a decision, and information on his/her right to ask for the MSPB to review the procedure by which he/she was separated. This requires the agency to give the probationer substantially the same consideration that would have been received as an applicant, if the derogatory information had become known before appointed.

    2. For unsatisfactory conduct after appointment, the probationer is notified in writing of the reason for termination and the effective date of termination. The notice, at a minimum, consists of the agency’s conclusions on the inadequacies of performance or conduct, but does not require complete and specific reasons. The employee is not given a right of reply. The appeal rights to MSPB are limited to discrimination allegations because of partisan political reasons, or race, color, religion, sex, national origin, physical handicap or age.

6.731.1.7.4  (07-01-2002)
OPM Actions

  1. OPM will notify applicants of actions taken by OPM. They may include rating applications ineligible, canceling eligibility, directing removal, and/or imposing debarment up to 3 years from all or specific competitive positions. Only OPM and MSPB can take a debarment action.

6.731.1.7.5  (07-01-2002)
Appeal to the Merit Systems Protection Board

  1. An individual who has been found unsuitable for employment may appeal the decision to the Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB). Procedures for filing an appeal with MSPB can be found in 5 CFR § 1201.

Exhibit 6.731.1-1  (07-01-2002)
Objections and Passovers

OBJECTIONS AND PASSOVERS
These instructions are for use by an OPM certified DEU when proposing to object or passover an eligible on a competitive certificate of eligibles issued under delegated examining procedures.
The Proposed Action Is… The Issue Is… Authority to Adjudicate Is…
Objection: All adverse determinations of non-preference eligibles (NV) and preference eligibles when the preference eligible is not being passed over in favor of a non-preference eligible. Qualifications AGENCY
Passover: All adverse determinations of 5-point (TP) and 10-point (XP, CP) eligibles who are being passed over in favor of a non-preference eligible. Qualifications AGENCY
Passover: All adverse determinations of 10-point, compensably disabled, 30% or more (CPS) eligibles who are being passed over in favor of a non-preference eligible. Qualifications OPM
Objection: All adverse determinations of non-preference eligibles (NV). Medical AGENCY
Passover: All adverse determinations of preference eligibles (TP, XP, CP, CPS.) Medical OPM
Objection: All adverse determinations of non-preference eligibles (NV). Suitability OPM
Passover: All adverse determinations of preference eligibles (CPS, CP, XP, TP). Suitability OPM
Send requests of all suitability determinations to: Send requests for passovers based on medical issues to:
FEDERAL INVESTIGATIONS PROCESSING  
CENTER  
SUITABILITY ADJUDICATION BRANCH DIRECTOR, STAFFING & REINVENTION OFFICE
OPM-FIPC U.S. OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT
PO Box 618 1900 E Street NW
Boyers, PA 16018-0618 Washington, DC 20415-0001
Telephone: 724-794-5612 Telephone: 202-606-0830
Send requests for passovers of 30% or more disabled (CPS) veterans based on qualifications issues to your local OPM Service Center.

Exhibit 6.731.1-2  (07-01-2002)
Suitability Referral Chart

United States
Office of Personnel Management
Investigations Service
Suitability Referral Chart
Referral Requirements. Applications are referred to OPM for suitability determinations as indicated by the following chart:
SUITABILITY REFERRAL CHART
  ISSUES CRITERIA
A. Any evidence of dishonesty or fraud in the competitive examination or appointment process (e.g., falsification of application) Always refer, regardless of the date of occurrence
B. - Any statutory debarment issue
- Any loyalty or terrorism issue
Refer for any occurrence, regardless of date
C. MAJOR & SUBSTANTIAL ISSUES
- Patterns of conduct (alcoholism/drug addiction; financial irresponsibility/major liabilities; dishonesty; unemployability for negligence or misconduct; criminal conduct)
- Other-Than-Honorable military discharge
- Felony offense
- Drug manufacturing/trafficking/sale
- Major honesty issue (e.g., extortion, armed robbery, embezzlement, perjury)
- Serious violent behavior (e.g., rape, aggravated assault, arson, child abuse, manslaughter)
- Criminal sexual misconduct
- Illegal use of firearms/explosives
- Hatch Act violation
- Employment-related misconduct involving dishonesty, criminal or violent behavior
Refer all within 3 years
(For patterns, the conduct may begin prior to, but must extend into, the last 3 years)
D. MODERATE ISSUES
- DWI
- Drug-related offenses
- Theft/Forgery
- Disorderly conduct/assault/criminal mischief/harassment
- Employment-related misconduct involving insubordination/absenteeism/rules violations
Refer for 2 or more occurrences within 3 years (may be a combination of issues and those in E)
E. MINOR ISSUES
- Minor liquor law violation
- Minor traffic violation
- Bad check
-Minor disruptive conduct (trespassing/vagrancy/loitering/disturbing peace).
Employment-related misconduct involving attitude/personality conflict
Refer for 3 or more occurrences within 3 years (may be a combination of these issues)

Note:

Court martial offenses should be referred according to the issues involved and the criteria for the conduct.

Exhibit 6.731.1-3  (07-01-2002)
Suitability Policy

This image is too large to be displayed in the current screen. Please click the link to view the image.
Offices should not cite general duties of the position unless they are clearly related to the conduct. The position must remain open until OPM makes a decision. If OPM sustains the objection/passover, the applicant is removed from consideration, and eligibility is suspended pending OPM’s final suitability determination. If the objection is not sustained, then the applicant is suitable for Federal employment.
REFERENCES
5 U.S.C 3318
5 U.S.C 3301
5 CFR 731
www.opm.gov/extra/investigate/suitref.htm
BACKGROUND
A recent Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration (TIGTA) audit of the Remittance Processing function determined that the IRS has no minimum standards for applicant hiring in Remittance Processing functions that can be consistently applied Servicewide. The regulations in 5 U.S.C § 3301 and 5 CFR § 731 provide specific guidance in suitability determinations for applicants in the Federal Service. Although each applicant’s case must be viewed on its own merits, this policy memorandum provides consistent guidance to ensure that applicants who have met all the qualifications also meet suitability requirements to protect taxpayer’s remittances and the mission of the Service.

Exhibit 6.731.1-4  (07-01-2002)
Information Requirements for Suitability Referrals to OPM

United States
Office of Personnel Management
Investigations Service
Information Requirements for Suitability Referrals to OPM
Please refer to the following information requirements when submitting requests to OPM for a suitability determination or advisory. Each request must include:
OFI 86A, "Request for Determination or Advisory" if known, indicate the position sensitivity in block 11.
Subject’s resume or OF 612.
OF 306, "Declaration for Federal Employment" , signed and dated by the applicant. If an OF 306 was not completed, please note this on the OFI 86A.
Record of contact with the subject or other contacts/investigations made by the agency concerning the issues.
Suitability Objection/Passover requests must be based on suitability factors found at 5 CFR 731.202. In addition to the information required for an Applicant Suitability Determination (above), the objecting agency must complete an SF 62 and provide any supporting documentation. Position sensitivity must be shown on the OFI 86A. (Note: Objections based on a perceived lack of ability, education, experience, or unsatisfactory performance evaluation should be submitted as Qualification Objection/Passover requests to the OPM Service Center.)
If the passover request involves a preference eligible with a 30% or more compensable disability, include the following:
    Proof of the disability dated within the past year, and
    Copy of letter sent to the preference eligible notifying him of the passover request, the reason for it, and of his right to respond to the Office of Personnel Management within fifteen (15) days in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 3318(b)(2).

Note:

The objection/passover cannot be based on confidential information. Case Examining Requests: A Case Examining request, made when there are limited vacancies to be filled with no further appointments anticipated in the near future, requires all information listed for an Applicant Suitability Determination (above). The OFI 86A should be prominently marked "CASE EXAMINING - SPECIAL HANDLING." Include the name and telephone number of the requesting official, so that he/she can be notified of OPM’s decision.

Advisory Opinions: Agencies with delegated suitability adjudication authority may request Advisory opinions from OPM. Each request should include the subject’s application, along with any other documentation you would like OPM to consider. Other Reference/Instructional Material: In addition to the above, please refer to the Federal Investigation Notice (FIN 95-01), January 19, 1995.
Please refer all requests to:
Office of Personnel Management
FlPC-SAB
PO Box 618
Boyers, PA 16018-0618
If you have questions concerning this information or your requests, please contact the Suitability Adjudications Branch at 724-794-5612.

More Internal Revenue Manual