- 6.751.1.1 Overview
- 6.751.1.2 Concept of Discipline
- 6.751.1.3 Responsibility
- 6.751.1.4 Authority
- 6.751.1.5 Supplemental Guidance
- 6.751.1.6 Administrative/Disciplinary Matters
- 6.751.1.7 Investigations by TIGTA
- 6.751.1.8 Cooperation with Other Investigative Agencies
- 6.751.1.9 Investigation Reports Referred by Chief Inspector to the Director, Strategic Human Resources
- 6.751.1.10 Referrals by TIGTA National Headquarters Positions
- 6.751.1.11 Referrals on Executives and Senior Managers (GS-15)
- 6.751.1.12 Records of Disciplinary and Adverse Actions Official Personnel Folder
- 6.751.1.13 Other Records
- 6.751.1.14 Disciplinary and Suitability Cases Closed — Annual Report
- 6.751.1.15 Guidelines for Identifying and Using Tax Information
- 6.751.1.16 Disciplinary and Other Actions
- Exhibit 6.751.1-1 Internal Revenue Service Guide for Penalty Determinations
- Exhibit 6.751.1-2 Suggested Language for Employee Request for Material Relied On and for Representative Request for Access to Tax Information
- Exhibit 6.751.1-3 Suggested Clearance Letter
- Exhibit 6.751.1-4 Suggested Closed Without Action Letter
- Exhibit 6.751.1-5 Suggested Admonishment
- Exhibit 6.751.1-6 Suggested Reprimand Letter
-
This IRM covers the concept and principles of discipline, administrative disciplinary matters, investigations and Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration (TIGTA) reports of investigation, disciplinary records and reports, guidelines for identifying and using tax information, and nondisciplinary and lesser disciplinary actions.
-
For purposes of this IRM, a non-disciplinary action is a clearance letter, a closed without action letter or a written letter of counseling.
-
For purposes of this IRM, a lesser disciplinary action is an admonishment or a reprimand.
-
Disciplinary Suspensions and Adverse Actions are covered in IRM 6.752. (Information will be contained in IRM 6.752 which will be published at a future date.)
-
Actions involving employees in their probationary or trial period are covered in IRM 6.300. (Information will be contained in IRM 6.300 which will be published at a future date.)
-
Discipline is adherence by all employees to known conditions and standards of conduct established to provide for the orderly and efficient administration of the Internal Revenue Service. This includes compliance with governmentwide standards of conduct, as well as standards of conduct, work procedures, and office practices established to accomplish the work of the Service. All employees and managers share in establishing and maintaining effective discipline.
-
Employees who fail to comply with standards of conduct, work procedures and office practices in the Internal Revenue Service will be subject to disciplinary action designed to correct the violation and motivate the individual to become a productive employee of the Internal Revenue Service. Disciplinary action will be used to correct the conduct or other actions of employees that impair operational effectiveness or damage the public image of the Internal Revenue Service.
-
Disciplinary action in each case must be fair, equitable, impartial, as timely as possible, and should not be taken to punish, but to correct. No standard schedule of offenses and penalties will be used in the Internal Revenue Service, although a guide that assists management in determining appropriate penalties may be used (see Exhibit 6.751.1-1). Each case will be considered individually and dealt with on its own merits, with due consideration to the supporting evidence as well as information supporting the employee’s position. Mitigating factors, willfulness, prior offenses and position occupied will be considered in deciding appropriate corrective action. Consistency in taking disciplinary actions is an objective. When a specific penalty is prescribed by statute, no discretion exists. In these cases the statutory penalty must be imposed and cannot be reduced (e.g., for willful misuse of a government owned or leased vehicle, 31 CFR § 0.735-46 requires a minimum 30-day suspension).
-
Supervisors are responsible for establishing and maintaining effective discipline within their work group. The supervisor should explain work requirements and other standards the employee is expected to meet when the employee enters on duty. Supervisors have a continuing responsibility to assure that proper discipline exists, and to keep employees informed of acceptable work performance and conduct requirements. Supervisors should take or recommend disciplinary action when employees deviate from acceptable standards of conduct or performance. When violations occur, supervisors must fully document the offense and be prepared to support the corrective action needed to make the employee a productive member of the work group.
-
The servicing Labor Relations office is responsible for advising and assisting supervisors in all disciplinary matters, including TIGTA reports of investigation, employee tax cases, IDRS security violations, and other conduct allegations referred for appropriate action.
-
The servicing Labor Relations office will ensure that proposed disciplinary actions are consistent, taking into account the employee’s position, the seriousness of the misconduct, and all other relevant factors; and will ensure that such actions are in conformance with laws, rules, regulations, and prior judicial and appeal decisions.
-
In addition, the servicing Labor Relations office will ensure that the following actions (including follow-up procedures) are taken in a timely manner:
-
Resolve differences between the Labor Relations office and line management with regard to the appropriate action.
-
Document, in case files, any differences between the recommended and final action taken.
-
Provide complete and timely updates to management information systems, including the Automated Labor and Employee Relations Tracking System (ALERTS).
-
Issue the Ethics Handbook to new employees — and the new or revised Ethics Handbook to all employees when published — and obtain and file in Official Personnel Folders any acknowledgments of receipt.
-
Ensure that ethics training programs, as required by Title 5 CFR § 2638, are maintained; and issue an annual notice, signed by the head of office, to remind employees of their responsibility to comply with the standards of conduct. The notice should emphasize rules and regulations that are determined to be most relevant and significant to the contemporaneous ethical climate.
-
-
Delegation Order No. 81 (as revised) establishes the level of officials authorized to take final action in a nondisciplinary action, lesser disciplinary action, and disciplinary suspension. The order also establishes the lowest level to which the authority may be redelegated.
Note:
Delegations of authority concerning HRM-related matters covered in Delegation Order 81 are being revised into several orders to be issued at a future date.
-
The level of officials authorized to propose and take final action in an adverse action will be detailed in the delegation orders to be issued at a future date (see note above and IRM 6.752).
-
Consultation with the servicing Labor Relations office is required before the issuance to an employee or employees of any notices involving non-disciplinary action, lesser disciplinary action, disciplinary suspension, or adverse action.
-
While the same standard of conduct applies to all Service employees, the level of accountability is directly proportionate to the level of trust, leadership and responsibility vested in the employee’s position. For example, employees in professional positions would be more accountable than a clerical employee for the same violation of the rules of conduct. Similarly, managers, executives, and employees directly involved in law enforcement activities (e.g., Special Agents) are, by definition, more accountable for a high degree of personal integrity in the exercise of their official responsibilities. Therefore, the position an employee occupies and the accountability associated with that position will be taken into consideration in determining the appropriate disciplinary action, even if the result is a greater penalty than that presented in Exhibit 6.751.1-1.
-
Supervisors and managers are expected to use the full extent of their authorities and capabilities in handling administrative matters that do not require professional investigative skills, techniques, or authorities. The documentation and availability of facts, and the relevant evidence to make a determination in administrative matters, is usually close at hand and readily available to supervisors and managers. In these types of administrative/disciplinary matters, interviews of any third parties are rarely necessary, all logical sources of information are readily available in most instances, and there is little reasonable potential that more serious forms of employee misconduct exist. Offenses that are administrative in nature may include:
-
Chronic or habitual tardiness;
-
Misuse of sick leave;
-
Drinking intoxicants while on duty;
-
Loafing (willful idleness or wasting time during working hours);
-
Reporting for duty intoxicated or under the influence of intoxicants;
-
Insubordination (refusal to obey orders, insolence and like behavior);
-
Absence without leave (any unauthorized absence from duty);
-
Constant quarreling, wrangling, provoking, or fighting with other employees, or interfering with their work;
-
Financial indebtedness;
-
Discourteous treatment of taxpayers; and
-
Any unauthorized accessing of an account via IDRS. However, when an employee makes an unauthorized update to any account via IDRS, the matter must be referred to TIGTA.
-
-
Supervisors and managers should not investigate other kinds of employee misconduct unless approval is obtained from the appropriate Internal Security manager or the TIGTA Inspector. Supervisors must not undertake any activities that require professional investigative skills, techniques, or authorities — such as obtaining affidavits or sworn statements, securing police records or other evidence not customarily available to them during the course of their official duties, or engaging in any concealed surveillance of others. In cases where it is impractical for supervisors or managers to obtain and document the facts necessary to the formulation of a responsible disciplinary judgment, they should obtain TIGTA’s support and assistance.
-
Where an administrative offense has occurred and there is no indication of any other form of employee misconduct that must be reported to TIGTA, supervisors and managers may take appropriate action after consultation with the servicing Labor Relations office. Notices involving non-disciplinary action, lesser disciplinary action, disciplinary suspension, or adverse action may not be issued to employees unless the necessary facts have been documented with sufficient clarity.
-
The investigative jurisdiction of TIGTA in background investigations, investigations resulting from complaints or irregularities concerning employees and, in certain instances, complaints and allegations made by employees of the Internal Revenue Service, is described in IRM (10)300.
-
Any allegation or information that an employee may have committed a crime, including violation of any tax law, or any IRS, Treasury, or Office of Government Ethics (OGE) conduct provision, must be promptly reported to TIGTA. Operating officials and supervisors will not, under any circumstances conduct an investigation into these matters unless concurred in by TIGTA.
-
Referral of TIGTA’s investigative reports shall be made on a "need to know" basis only; however, they should be referred to the levels of management having authority to recommend and take final action. All persons shall be cautioned to treat such investigative reports in a strictly confidential manner.
-
The desirability of a prompt evaluation and a timely decision on a conduct or suitability case cannot be overemphasized. Undue delay between management’s awareness of an offense and the corrective action will detract from the effectiveness of the discipline. Officials should strive to close cases or issue notices of proposed action promptly after receipt of all pertinent data.
-
When the proposing official, after consultation with the servicing Labor Relations office, believes that investigative reports require clarification, development of additional facts, or further investigation, the report will be returned to the servicing TIGTA office via the same channels by which it was received — along with a memorandum outlining the clarification, additional facts or information sought.
-
As a result of an oral and/or written reply to a notice of adverse action, either the proposing or deciding official may find issues raised that warrant the development of additional facts and data by investigation. The report, after consultation with the servicing Labor Relations office, will be returned to the servicing TIGTA office via the same channels by which it was received — together with a memorandum outlining the additional facts and data desired and, if appropriate, the area(s) of further investigation.
-
TIGTA investigation reports regarding actions that have been completed will be returned to the appropriate TIGTA office in accordance with any applicable procedures and instructions on Form 2076, TIGTA Referral Memorandum. Reports should be returned no later than the effective date of an action. Cases where actions are stayed in accordance with the collective bargaining agreements should be returned no later than the date the action would have been effective but for the stay. If the obtaining of an SF-50 in any action will result in a delay of more than a few days in the return of a report, the report should be returned without the SF-50 and the SF-50 should be forwarded to TIGTA when it becomes available.
-
Whenever an action is subsequently modified in a case that is based on a TIGTA report of investigation, TIGTA should be provided with the information, including any changed personnel notices or settlement agreements.
-
When portions of a TIGTA report form the supporting material used in an evidence file, permission to copy and use those pertinent portions of the report must be obtained from TIGTA.
-
In some instances, complaints of improper conduct by Service employees may involve possible violations of law under the jurisdiction of another Federal agency or a local government. Since TIGTA is responsible for maintaining liaison with such agencies, matters of this type will be referred to TIGTA.
-
In cooperating with Federal or local investigative agencies, employees will do so within the limitation of statutes and regulations governing the disclosure of information.
-
If an investigation report or allegation referred for management action concerns two or more field employees, at least one of whom is in a position centralized to the National Headquarters, the report will be referred by TIGTA to the Director, Strategic Human Resources, for handling in accordance with the procedures in 6.751.1.11 below.
-
If an investigation report or allegation referred for management action concerns two or more employees in decentralized positions located in different posts of duty, TIGTA will forward the report to the Director, Personnel Services, AWSS, who will refer the cases to the appropriate embedded Human Resources offices for analysis and recommendation. The Director, Personnel Services, AWSS, will review the recommendations to assure consistent action. If either office does not agree with a determination made by the Director, Personnel Services, the recommendation will be submitted to the Deputy Commissioner for decision.
-
Depending on the nature of adverse information developed by the investigation or the unusual circumstances or sensitivity presented by the case, the Chief Inspector may recommend to the Deputy Commissioner that a conduct case involving an employee in a decentralized position be adjudicated in the National Headquarters — with or without referral to the Business Unit Chief for recommendation. If the Deputy Commissioner agrees, the case will be reviewed by Personnel Services, AWSS, and action to be taken will be recommended by the Director, Personnel Services, AWSS, to the appropriate official. If the Deputy Commissioner Operations does not agree that the case should be adjudicated in the National Headquarters, and he/she and the Chief Inspector are unable to resolve their differences, the matter will be presented by the Deputy Commissioner to the Commissioner for decision.
-
Investigation reports or referrals of allegations for management action concerning employees of the National Headquarters will be transmitted to the appropriate National Headquarters official concerned through the Director, Personnel Services, AWSS (except for Executive and Senior Manager (GS -15) cases).
-
The Director, Personnel Services, AWSS, or his/her designee will review the case and forward the report and related documents to the appropriate official for action. The Director, Personnel Services, AWSS, provides technical assistance as may be necessary for the proper handling of such cases, and for returning investigation reports to TIGTA after action has been completed by the appropriate official.
-
The appropriate National Headquarters official (or his/her designee) is responsible, with the technical assistance of the Director, Personnel Services, AWSS, for taking proper action with respect to matters covered in investigation reports. Such matters include review of the case, preparation and delivery of any notices, receiving and evaluating any employee answers (including answers in person), and preparation and delivery of final decision letters and any other related correspondence. The TIGTA report, with completed Form 2076, Inspection Referral Memorandum, will be forwarded to the Director, Personnel Services, AWSS, for return to TIGTA.
-
TIGTA Reports and allegations referred for management action involving Executives, Senior Managers (GS-15) and positions over which the Commissioner retains authority will be processed in accordance with standard operating procedures approved by the Commissioner or Deputy Commissioner as appropriate.
-
The following are filed on the left or temporary side of the Official Personnel Folder:
-
Letters of Official Reprimand will be retained for a two-year period, except that if — after issuance — it is determined that the reprimand was unwarranted, it will be removed at once.
-
Clearance or closed without action letters which the employee requests be filed in the Official Personnel Folder will be retained for a two year period.
-
Acknowledgements of receipt of documents transmitting standard of conduct information, as prescribed by the National Headquarters, will be kept permanently. As new or revised standards of conduct are issued, acknowledgements of receipt of those documents will replace previous acknowledgements.
-
-
Permanent records affecting the employee’s status and service, including Notifications of Personnel Action, Standard Form 50, are filed on the right or permanent side of the Official Personnel Folder.
-
IRM 1(15) 59.31, Administrative Records, establishes the required retention period for the disciplinary action and adverse action case files.
-
Records and files dealing with individual disciplinary or adverse action cases should be maintained in a locked container in accordance with IRM 1(16)12, Manager’s Security Handbook.
-
Form 2582, Disciplinary and Suitability Cases Closed, will be used for compiling statistical information concerning employee disciplinary and suitability cases closed in each function and the National Headquarters during each 12-month period ending September 30.
-
The Chief, Office of Ethics and Business Conduct, will prepare a consolidated report for distribution to Personnel Officers and the Office of Personnel Operations.
-
Tax returns or return information may not be disclosed in proposing or effecting discipline, except as provided by the specific provisions of Section 6103 of the Internal Revenue Code. To the extent that a return or return information is relied upon in proposing or effecting discipline, the confidentiality of the information must be safeguarded.
-
Under the provisions of Section 6103(b)(1), a tax return is defined as "any tax or information return, declaration of estimated tax, or claim for refund required by, or provided for or permitted under the provisions of this title which is filed with the Secretary (of the Treasury) by, on behalf of, or with respect to any person and any amendment or supplement thereto, including supporting schedules, attachments or lists which are supplemental to, or part of, the return so filed."
-
Return information is defined as "a taxpayer’s identity, the nature, source or amount of his/her income, payments, receipts, deductions, exemptions, credits, assets, liabilities, net worth, tax liability, tax withheld, deficiencies, over assessments, or tax payments, whether the taxpayer’s return was, is being, or will be examined or subject to other investigation or processing, or any other data received by, recorded by, prepared by, furnished to, or collected by the Secretary with respect to a return or with respect to the determination of the existence, or possible existence of liability of any person under this title for any tax, penalty, interest, fine, forfeiture, or other imposition or offense, and any part of any written determination or any background file document relating to such written determination which is not open to public interpretation."
-
Section 6103(1)(4)(A) of the Internal Revenue Code permits the disclosure of returns or return information to an employee or former employee, or to his/her duly authorized representative, when, upon written request, the appropriate official judges the disclosure to be relevant and material to a proceeding involving personnel or claimant representative matters. Since disciplinary or adverse actions are proceedings involving personnel matters, a duly authorized representative may be authorized access to returns or return information if such access is or may be relevant and material to the disciplinary or adverse action. A request for disclosure under 6103(1)(4)(A) will be evaluated by the appropriate official with delegated authority pursuant to Delegation Order No. 156. (lnformation will be contained in Delegation Order 156, which will be published at a future date.) A disclosure under 6103(1)(4)(A) requires an accounting under the Privacy Act.
-
When dealing with returns and return information in disciplinary letters, code the return information, attach a key, and indicate that the employee is restricted from making disclosures of tax information without proper approval. In addition, in letters proposing a disciplinary suspension or adverse action, indicate that:
-
A form letter is attached by which the employee may request a copy of the evidence file (see Exhibit 6.751.1-2);
-
Tax information in the evidence file or in the proposal letter and its key may be used solely in the preparation for the action or proceeding;
-
The employee is subject to the provisions of IRC 7213 and 7431 in the event of an unlawful disclosure of tax information;
-
A written request must be made if the employee wishes to disclose the tax information in the evidence file, or in the letter and its key, to any person other than a Department of the Treasury employee in connection with that employee’s official duties with respect to this matter; and
-
If the employee designates a representative or representatives and the employee wishes to disclose the tax information to that person or persons, each representative must sign and deliver a second form letter, which is attached (see Exhibit 6.751.1-2).
-
-
A sanitized copy of the evidence file is normally necessary when an action is appealed to a third party. At the proceeding or hearing, an employee or an employee’s representative may use the sanitized tax information contained in the evidence file submitted by the Service to the third party. Other tax information may not be disclosed by the employee, or the employee’s representative, unless a separate written request has been submitted to and approved by the Service.
-
In the event that disclosure of the tax information would seriously impair Federal tax administration, release of tax information to an employee and the authorization of disclosure of tax information by the employee may not be granted.
-
When an employee’s own tax matters are an issue in a disciplinary action under appeal to a third party by the employee, disclosure of the employee’s tax records to the third party is permissible.
-
When an employee’s failure to comply with the tax laws is a reason for taking a disciplinary or adverse action, use the following in the remarks section of SF-50: "Reason for action — Violation relating to IRM 6.751.1.16." Letters of reprimand for tax offenses should be placed in a sealed envelope in the OPF, with the following on the outside: "Letter of reprimand for violation relating to IRM 6.751.1.16. To be viewed by authorized management officials only. Destroy: two years from date of letter."
-
The material that follows in this subsection includes procedures for taking appropriate nondisciplinary and lesser disciplinary actions, including special procedures for dealing with information resulting from the TIGTA investigations of alleged improper conduct. Information on disciplinary suspensions and adverse actions is contained in IRM 6.752. (Information will be contained in IRM 6.752 which will be published at a future date.)
-
TIGTA conducts investigations of alleged improper conduct and prepares a report. The report is presented to management for review and decision on whether disciplinary action will be required. If no disciplinary action is required, one of the following actions must be taken:
-
Issue Clearance Letter. When an allegation is investigated by TIGTA and the Report of Investigation clearly establishes no credible evidence in support of the allegation, or clearly establishes the innocence of the employee, a clearance letter will be issued to the employee. At a minimum, the clearance letter (Exhibit 6.751.1-3) should identify the allegation(s) investigated, either specifically or by the use of a phrase such as: "The allegations about which you were interviewed by TIGTA on (giving the date)." Specificity as to the allegation for which the employee is being cleared is needed to prevent a blanket clearance for other allegations for which the employee may still be (or may come) under investigation. A clearance letter may be modified appropriately if it is desired to make it more cordial. The letter should also advise the employee that no record concerning the investigation will be filed in the Official Personnel Folder (OPF), but that upon the employee’s request, a copy will be filed in his/her OPF as a temporary record to be disposed of after two years.
-
Issue Closed Without Action Letter. Where the evidence contained in the TIGTA Report of Investigation fails to clearly establish an allegation that wrongdoing occurred, and further investigation could not resolve the issue, a closed without action letter (Exhibit 6.751.1-4) is appropriate.
-
-
Typical situations warranting use of closed without action letters occur when:
-
One person has made an accusation denied by the employee and no other evidence is presented to support or refute the accusation; or
-
There is a balance of evidence to both support and refute the allegation. In such cases, a clearance letter would be inappropriate since the evidence does not support it unequivocally. To put the matter to rest, the employee is told that the matter cannot be resolved and is being closed without further action. A closed without action letter does not preclude reopening of the case should additional evidence be forthcoming at a future time to clearly establish the guilt or innocence of the employee.
-
-
A closed without action letter may also be used in certain unusual cases where a determination is made that it would not be in the best interests of the Service to take action.
-
At a minimum, the closed without action letter should specifically identify the allegation(s) investigated, and indicate that it has been decided to close the case without action. The letter could be amplified by stating that, since the evidence fails to clearly establish falseness or truth of the allegation or that there is not a preponderance of evidence to support the allegations and further investigation would be valueless, the matter is being closed without action. A cautionary statement may be included as deemed appropriate. The letter should formally advise the employee that, at his/her option, the letter will be filed in his/her Official Personnel Folder as a temporary record that will be disposed of after two years.
-
When an employee’s conduct or other action warrants disciplinary action, one of the following actions should be taken: admonishment or letter of official reprimand.
-
An admonishment is the first level and least severe form of disciplinary action. It is used when the employee’s conduct or other actions warrant correction designed to enable the employee to become a productive employee of the Internal Revenue Service.
-
Normally, the admonishment is administered in a private discussion between an employee and his/her supervisor. In this discussion, the supervisor indicates specifically the conduct or other actions he/she has identified as requiring change, improvement, or correction, making clear that the discussion constitutes an admonishment rather than a counseling session. The supervisor gives the employee an opportunity to orally respond. The supervisor then specifically sets forth the conduct or other actions that are expected of the employee, and ensures that the employee understands what is expected.
-
The admonishment will be confirmed in writing by a dated letter or memorandum, the subject of which is "admonishment. " The letter/memorandum should set forth the offending conduct as specifically as possible and, with equal specificity, the corrective action required. It should then advise the employee of the appeal rights available through the agency or the negotiated grievance procedure, as appropriate (see IRM 6.771.1 or negotiated agreement). The notice should also state that a copy of the written confirmation may be retained by the supervisor for two years and will be disposed of at the end of that time. The confirmation should close with a warning that repetition or failure to correct may result in more serious action. The admonishment will not be filed in the employee’s Official Personnel Folder. After two years, no use can be made of the admonishment — or reason therefore — in any subsequent disciplinary action. Since an admonishment is a formal disciplinary action, advice and assistance of the servicing Labor Relations office should be obtained for correct format and inclusion of all necessary details (see Exhibit 6.751.1-5 ). Applicable collective bargaining agreements should be considered when effecting an admonishment.
-
The letter of official reprimand is used when conduct or other actions warrant an action more severe than admonishment — but less severe than one involving the loss of pay, such as a disciplinary suspension or an adverse action. A letter of official reprimand is appropriate for use for the first offense, or in line with the concept of progressive discipline for repetition of a relatively minor offense. The letter is a means of tracking the offending conduct and retaining the record temporarily in the Official Personnel Folder, as well as forcefully bringing to the employee’s attention the corrective action needed for improvement. The action should make it clear that failure to correct may result in more serious action (See Exhibit 6.751.1-6). Applicable collective bargaining agreements should be considered when effecting an official reprimand.
-
The letter of official reprimand should be prepared with the advice and assistance of the servicing Labor Relations office. It should contain:
-
An opening statement that, "This is a letter of official reprimand for (listing reason or reasons for the action)" ;
-
A description of the offense or offenses including time, place and circumstances of the offense;
-
A statement, in off-duty misconduct cases, of the connection between the employee’s conduct and the efficiency of the Service (the nexus). See IRM 6.752 (Information will be contained in IRM 6.752 which will be published at a future date.);
-
A statement of those offenses brought to the employee’s attention within the preceding two years (including admonishments, other reprimands, counseling, or caution/warning letters) if those prior offenses are relied upon;
-
A statement that repetition of any misconduct or failure to correct, change, or improve the offending conduct would result in more severe disciplinary action up to and including removal;
-
A statement advising the employee of the appeal rights through the agency or negotiated grievance procedure (as appropriate), the time limit for filing, and the person to contact for information concerning appeal rights (see IRM 6.771.1, or appropriate negotiated agreement); and
-
A statement that a copy of the letter of official reprimand will be placed in the employee’s Official Personnel Folder for two years and disposed of at the end of that time.
-
-
All letters of official reprimand will be filed on the temporary side of the Official Personnel Folder for two years, and disposed of at the end of that time. An official letter of reprimand or reasons therefore cannot be cited in a subsequent disciplinary or adverse action two years after the date of the letter. It can and should be cited in any action taken during the two-year period following the date of its issuance.
| INTRODUCTION |
| This Guide to Penalty Determinations is included as an Exhibit to Internal Revenue Manual 6.751 (formerly 0751). The Guide represents possible code of conduct violations that could be committed, and a range of suggested reasonable penalties for each of the offenses. It is not intended to be an exhaustive listing of all offenses. The situation of both the employee’s position and the offense must be considered on a case by case basis. Progressive discipline should be based on individual mitigating and/or aggravating circumstances. The penalties are graduated in severity based on numerous factors, including prior disciplinary actions or statutory requirements. In those instances requiring proposed mandatory removal for a first offense, such as a violation of the Restructuring and Reform Act (RRA 98) §1203, a graduated range of penalties cannot be applied because only the Commissioner can mitigate the penalty. |
| The Guide does not apply to employees serving a probationary or trial period. Failure to demonstrate fitness for continued employment may result in termination during the probationary or trial period (5 CFR §315). |
| Downgrades may be effected when appropriate, absent a statutory requirement for removal. Downgrades should be considered when the offense would not reasonably impair successful performance in another position within the IRS, if available. |
| CONCEPT OF DISCIPLINE PER IRM 6.751.1.2 |
| Discipline is adherence by all employees to known conditions and standards of conduct established to provide for the orderly and efficient administration of the Internal Revenue Service (IRS). No employee will be the subject of a disciplinary or adverse action except for such cause as will promote the efficiency of the service (i.e., if the conduct may reasonably be expected to interfere with the ability of the person to function in the position or the agency’s ability to discharge its responsibility). |
| Disciplinary action is designed to correct the conduct. The proposed corrective action in each case must be fair, equitable, impartial, as timely as possible, and should not be taken to punish but to correct and motivate the individual to become a productive employee. |
| CHOOSING AN APPROPRIATE ACTION UNDER THESE GUIDELINES |
| In considering whether corrective action is warranted, the proposing official must review and analyze all the evidence of record. Proof beyond a reasonable doubt is the criterion for adjudication of a criminal case. An adverse action must be supported by a preponderance of the evidence, and a lesser disciplinary action or a disciplinary suspension must be supported by substantial evidence. Please refer to 6.751.1 for definitions of nondisciplinary and lesser disciplinary actions. |
| Choosing a corrective action that is reasonable and appropriate for the circumstances involved is extremely important. All relevant factors must be given careful consideration. This document serves as a guide for determining the proper corrective action, and is not intended to establish a rigid standard or to imply that a greater or lesser corrective action is inappropriate. |
| A corrective action that is below the range indicated could be appropriate for minor or technical violations, or for cases where there are compelling mitigating factors. |
| Counseling, though not disciplinary in nature, is the first appropriate step in the succession leading up to progressive discipline. Counseling must be conducted on an ongoing basis and completed in a timely manner. The employee must be on advanced notice that the conduct is unacceptable. The problem areas must be identified and the employee given sufficient time to correct the action. |
| A corrective action that is above the range indicated could be appropriate for particularly egregious misconduct, or for cases where there are significant aggravating factors. Even for offenses where removal is not listed, removal for a first offense is not precluded. |
| This guide may be deviated from depending on the individual circumstances that may be involved. Each case will be considered individually and dealt with on it’s own merit, with due consideration to the supporting evidence as well as information supporting the employee’s position. Mitigating factors, including the Douglas Factors (see (5) and (9) below), must be considered when proposing and deciding disciplinary and adverse actions. These factors are listed in (9) and in the negotiated agreement for bargaining unit employees. Multiple offenses, or offenses that violate more than one law, rule, regulation, or practice, normally will be grounds for more severe action than indicated for a single offense. Repeated offenses, whether or not they are of the same kind or directly related, normally will be grounds for more severe action (including removal) than indicated. |
| WHAT IS PROGRESSIVE DISCIPLINE? |
| If it is necessary to take a disciplinary action against an employee, the penalty selected should generally be progressive in nature, if appropriate. The Service endorses the principle of progressive discipline, which means that management should take the least severe action that will produce the desired corrective effect. However, not all instances support progressive discipline. Examples of actions that do not support progressive discipline include those that require statutory minimum mandatory corrective action (e.g., Misuse of Government Vehicle, RRA 98, §1203), an egregious singular act of misconduct, or a pattern or sequence of similar misconduct. |
| WHAT ARE DOUGLAS FACTORS? |
| The Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB) set out guidelines explaining the types of factors agencies must consider in selecting a corrective action. The Douglas Factors are the relevant factors that the agency must consider (see (9) below). Not all of the factors apply in every case and not all factors will be given equal weight. Before deciding upon a corrective action, the deciding official must consider the relevant factors, given the circumstances of each individual case, and strike a responsible balance within the tolerable limits of reasonableness. The list of factors included herein for purposes of illustration are neither meant to be exhaustive nor intended to be applied mechanically by formula, but rather to outline the tolerable limits of reasonableness. Factors need not have equal weight in a specific case. Considerable judgment must be used in determining the appropriate penalty. There is no simple or mechanical system or method that managers should apply. Therefore, the rationale upon which the decision is based must be justified, documented in writing, and explainable in a third party review. All relevant provisions of the master collective bargaining agreement continue to apply to bargaining unit employees. |
| WHEN CAN ALTERNATIVE DISCIPLINE BE UTILIZED? |
| Alternative discipline may be used as an alternative to the traditional disciplinary process to positively change an employee’s conduct (NORD/NC V, Article 38, Section 2). The employee will be informed that "traditional" discipline is being contemplated, and that the employee may request consideration of an alternative form of discipline. This applies to any and all cases for which a reprimand or suspension of less than fourteen (14) days is a possibility. Under no circumstances is alternative discipline required to be used. However, if used, the provisions of the NORD/NC Agreement must be met. Alternative discipline cannot be offered or pursued in adverse actions, including removals. |
| WHAT ABOUT PENALTIES FOR SENIOR EXECUTIVE SERVICE PERSONNEL? |
| Title 5 U.S.C. §7541-7543 mandates that a suspension action against individuals in the Senior Executive Service (SES) must be for a duration of more than fourteen (14) days. There is no restriction, however, on issuing a written reprimand for offenses that do not warrant suspensions. |
| ESTABLISHMENT OF NEXUS IN OFF-DUTY MISCONDUCT CASES |
| In cases of off-duty misconduct, the nexus must be stated. Nexus is a description of why and how there is a connection between the specific off-duty misconduct and the efficiency of the Service. For example, how would drunk driving that led to an arrest interfere with the efficiency of the Service so as to warrant a disciplinary or adverse action? It is a good idea to begin the nexus statement as follows: "Such conduct seriously impairs the efficiency of the Service because..." See Article 38, Section 6 and Article 39, Section 3 of NORD/NC V for additional information concerning nexus statements. Additional guidance on the preparation of nexus statements may be found in IRM 6.752.1, Exhibits 6.752.1-1, and 6.752.2-1, 6.752.2-3, and 6.752.2-7 in IRM 6.752, Disciplinary Suspensions and Adverse Actions. |
Listed below are the Douglas Factors, for management’s use in determining a penalty.
| DOUGLAS FACTORS |
| 1. | The nature and seriousness of the offense, and its relation to the employee’s duties, position and responsibilities, including whether the offense was intentional, inadvertent, or was committed maliciously or for gain or was frequently repeated; |
| 2. | The employee’s job level and type of employment, including supervisory or fiduciary role, contacts with the public, and prominence of the position; |
| 3. | The employee’s past disciplinary record; |
| 4. | The employee’s past work record, including length of service, performance on the job, ability to get along with fellow workers, and dependability; |
| 5. | The effect of the offense upon the employee’s ability to perform at a satisfactory level, and its effect upon supervisor’s confidence in the employee’s ability to perform assigned duties; |
| 6. | Consistency of the penalty with those imposed upon other employees for the same or similar offense; |
| 7. | The notoriety of the offense or its impact upon the reputation of the Agency; |
| 8. | The clarity with which the employee was on notice of any rules that were violated in committing the offense, or had been warned about the conduct in question; |
| 9. | Potential for the employee’s rehabilitation; |
| 10. | Mitigating circumstances surrounding the offense, such as unusual job tensions, personality problems, mental impairment, harassment, or bad faith, malice or provocation on the part of others involved in the matter; and |
| 11. | The adequacy and effectiveness of alternative sanctions to deter such conduct in the future by the employee or others. |
| OFFENSE I | NATURE OF OFFENSE | FIRST OFFENSE | SECOND OFFENSE |
THIRD OFFENSE |
KEY PENALTY FACTORS |
||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| INSUBORDINATION 5 CFR 2635.101–107 | a. | Refusal to obey orders; willful failure to follow supervisory instructions or requirements; defiance of authority and other such acts of insubordination. | Written Reprimand to Removal | 5 Day Suspension to Removal | Removal | Work related consequences, reasons for failure to comply. | |
| CREATING A DISTURBANCE / WORKPLACE DISRUPTION 5 CFR 2635.101–107 | a. | Creating a disturbance resulting in an adverse effect on morale, production or maintenance of proper discipline, including use of language or gestures which are abusive or offensive to a reasonable person. | Written Reprimand to 5 Day Suspension | 5 to 14 Day Suspension to Removal | 15 Day Suspension | Impact on the person relative to the culture in the local environment. | |
| b. | Creating a disturbance resulting in a significant interruption in the work, or where there was taxpayer (Public) involvement or awareness. | Written Reprimand to 15 Day Suspension | 15 Day Suspension to Removal | Removal | Degree of public impact or work interruption. | ||
| Fighting /Physical AssAults /Threats | a. | Threatening another employee with physical harm. | Written Reprimand to Removal | 15 Day Suspension to Removal | Removal | Impact on person threatened, provocation, severity of threat, effect on work. | |
| b. | Hitting, pushing or other acts against another without causing injury. | Written Reprimand to 14 Day Suspension | 15 Day Suspension to Removal | Removal | |||
| c. | Hitting, pushing or other provocation, acts against another causing injury. | Written Reprimand to Removal | 30 Day Suspension to Removal | Removal | |||
| d. | Assault or battery on a taxpayer or taxpayer representative or other employee of the IRS: | ||||||
| RRA 98 §1203(b)(5) | (1) | All matters, other than (2) below, involving assault and battery. | Written Reprimand to 14 Day Suspension | ||||







