- 4.75.13 Issue Development and Conclusion
- 126.96.36.199 Program Scope and Objectives
- 188.8.131.52.1 Background
- 184.108.40.206.2 Authority
- 220.127.116.11.3 Responsibilities
- 18.104.22.168.4 Program Controls
- 22.214.171.124.5 Acronyms
- 126.96.36.199 Developing the Facts
- 188.8.131.52 Collecting and Recording the Facts
- 184.108.40.206 Evidence
- 220.127.116.11.1 Oral Testimony
- 18.104.22.168.2 Documentary Evidence
- 22.214.171.124.2.1 Summons
- 126.96.36.199 Special Case-Development Procedures
- 188.8.131.52.1 Requesting Procedural Assistance
- 184.108.40.206.2 Requesting Technical Assistance
- 220.127.116.11.3 Requests for Technical Advice Memorandum (TAM)
- 18.104.22.168.4 Procedures for Processing an IRC 6707A Penalty
- 22.214.171.124.5 IRC 45R Credit for Small EO Employers
- 126.96.36.199 Arriving at Conclusions
- 188.8.131.52 Proposing Changes in Tax or Status
- 184.108.40.206.1 Proposing Alternative Positions
- 220.127.116.11.2 The Closing Conference
- 18.104.22.168.3 Issuing a Report
- 22.214.171.124.4 Corrected Reports
- 126.96.36.199 Specific Issues - Special Considerations and Procedures
- 188.8.131.52.1 Revocation of Tax-Exempt Status
- 184.108.40.206.2 Disqualification of Tax-Exempt Status
- 220.127.116.11.3 Revocation Effective Dates
- 18.104.22.168.4 Reclassification Effective Dates
- 22.214.171.124.5 Effective Date In IRC 7805(b) Relief Cases
- 126.96.36.199.6 Converted Returns
- 188.8.131.52.7 Inadequate Records
- 184.108.40.206.8 The PATH Act and Issues Subject to Declaratory Judgment Under IRC 7428
- 220.127.116.11.9 Group Suspense
- 18.104.22.168.10 Form 1254 Suspense Cases
- 22.214.171.124.11 Procedures for Disposition of IRC 501(p) Cases
- 126.96.36.199.12 Restricted Interest Cases
- 188.8.131.52 Inactive Organizations
- 184.108.40.206 Researching an Issue and Citing the Law
- 220.127.116.11.1 Citators: Researching Case History
- 18.104.22.168.2 Other Research Sources
- 22.214.171.124.3 On-line Research
- Exhibit 4.75.13-1 Restricted Interest Examples
Part 4. Examining Process
Chapter 75. Exempt Organizations Examination Procedures
Section 13. Issue Development and Conclusion
April 11, 2017
(1) This transmits revised IRM 4.75.13, Exempt Organizations Examination Procedures, Issue Development and Conclusion.
(1) Renamed IRM 4.75.13 from "Issue Development" to "Issue Development and Conclusion" .
(2) As of the publication of this manual, TE/GE is undergoing a restructure which will affect titles, authorities, and offices. All references to The Examination Program and Review (EPR) and the authorities granted to the manager of that office will be changed, pending announcement for the authorized replacement.
(3) With the sole exception of IRM 126.96.36.199.4, converted IRM 4.75.13 to comply with the Plain Writing Act of 2010, Public Law 111–274. At the request of Chief Counsel, IRM 188.8.131.52.4 is specifically worded to ensure clarity in how to process the IRC 6707A penalty.
(4) Incorporated the contents of Interim Guidance Memorandum TEGE 07-0115-002, IRM Sections Impacted by Realignment of Work between TE/GE and the Office of Associate Chief Counsel (TEGE), into new IRM 184.108.40.206.3.
(5) Incorporated the contents of Interim Guidance Memorandum TEGE 04-0216-003, PATH Act Impact on Revocations and Modifications of Exempt Status, in new IRM 220.127.116.11.8.
(6) Added IRM 18.104.22.168, Program Scope and Objectives.
(7) Removed IRM 22.214.171.124.4, Modification of Tax-Exempt Status, based on Section 406 of the Protecting Americans from Tax Hikes Act of 2015 (PATH Act), P.L. 114-113.
(8) Removed information on modifications from IRM 126.96.36.199.5 and 188.8.131.52.5.1 as a result of the PATH Act.
(9) Rearranged information in IRM 184.108.40.206 for clarity.
(10) Renamed IRM 220.127.116.11.1, Oral Testimony.
(11) Added reference to IDR enforcement procedure in IRM 18.104.22.168.2.1, Summons.
(12) Rearranged information in IRM 22.214.171.124 for clarity.
(13) Transferred closing conference content from IRM 126.96.36.199.3 to IRM 188.8.131.52.2. This is a communication process that is suited to this manual. IRM 4.75.16 addresses closing and shipping procedures after the reporting and audit communication process.
(14) Renamed IRM 184.108.40.206.4, Corrected Reports.
(15) Incorporated information in IRM 220.127.116.11.2 into IRM 18.104.22.168.1 and subsequent subsections renumbered.
(16) Combined information in IRM 22.214.171.124.5.1 into IRM 126.96.36.199.3 and IRM 188.8.131.52.4.
(17) Updated IRM 184.108.40.206.12 to reflect new procedures for processing restricted interest cases.
(18) Rearranged information in IRM 220.127.116.11 for clarity purposes. Added the TE/GE Knowledge Management Portal.
(19) The table below provides a listing of old sections of IRM 4.75.13 and the corresponding new sections.
|Old Section:||New Section:|
|IRM 18.104.22.168.1, Summons||IRM 22.214.171.124.2.1, Summons|
|IRM 126.96.36.199.2, Sampling Techniques, IRM 188.8.131.52, Collecting and Recording the Facts, and IRM 184.108.40.206.2, Significant Items||IRM 220.127.116.11, Collecting and Recording the Facts|
|IRM 18.104.22.168.3, Referral for Specialists, IRM 22.214.171.124.4, Request for Collateral Examinations, IRM 126.96.36.199.6, Requesting Technical or Procedural Assistance, IRM 188.8.131.52.7, Special Case Development Rules for Churches, and IRM 184.108.40.206.8, Special Case Development Rules for Credit Counseling Organizations||IRM 220.127.116.11.1, Requesting Procedural Assistance, and IRM 18.104.22.168.2, Requesting Technical Assistance|
|IRM 22.214.171.124.5, Requests for Technical Advice||IRM 126.96.36.199.3, Requests for Technical Advice Memorandum (TAM)|
Margaret Von Lienen
Acting Director, Exempt Organizations
Tax Exempt and Government Entities
Purpose: This manual focuses on an agent’s responsibilities in developing and concluding issues present in an audit. Topics addressed include:
Rules of evidence
Special procedures for specific issues
Concluding an issue
Research of tax law
Audience: The procedures in this manual apply to Exempt Organizations Examination employees in the following series:
Policy Owner: Director, Exempt Organizations
Program Owner: Exempt Organizations
Audit of exempt organizations is conducted through a review of the purposes, activities and legal structures of such organizations. A well-developed audit is one in which:
Technical positions are well thought out.
The facts are properly developed.
Audit conclusions are fully supported.
The case file is well documented.
Policy Statement 4-119 states that the primary objective of the EO audit program is regulatory, with emphasis on continued qualification of exempt organizations. See IRM 188.8.131.52.36.
IRC 7602 gives agents the authority to:
Examine any books, papers, records or other data necessary to complete an audit.
Issue a summons for information necessary to complete an audit.
Take testimony under oath to secure additional information needed.
Inquire into any offense connected with the administration or enforcement of the Internal Revenue laws.
During an audit, agents are responsible for determining if the organization:
Meets the requirements for exemption.
Has the proper foundation status (501(c)(3) organizations only).
Filed all required tax and information returns.
Reported information and tax liabilities correctly.
Agents are also responsible for being familiar with and acting in accord with taxpayer rights. See IRC 7803(a)(3).
Agents should consult the K-Net Knowledge Management Network to ensure proper issue development and consistent application of the law.
The table lists commonly used acronyms and their definitions.
Acronym Definition AIMS Audit Information Management System ATAT Abusive Tax Avoidance Transactions CFR Code of Federal Regulations EO Exempt Organizations EP Employee Plans EPR Examination Program and Review FBAR Foreign Bank and Financial Account Report IDR Information Document Request IRC/Code Internal Revenue Code ITG Indian Tribal Government K-Net Knowledge Management Network LB&I Large Business & International LUQ Large, unusual, questionable NMF Non-master file NOL Net operating loss PACER Public Access to Court Electronic Records RAR Revenue Agent Report SB/SE Small Business/Self-Employed SPDER Office of Servicewide Policy, Directives and Electronic Research SRS Specialist Referral System TAM Technical Advice Memorandum TE/GE Tax Exempt/Government Entities UBI Unrelated business income
Well-developed facts are a vital part of a quality audit.
You can develop the facts by:
Examining the organization’s books and records.
Interviewing the organization’s representatives and management.
Touring the organization’s facilities.
Contacting third parties to corroborate taxpayer statements and get information the taxpayer fails to provide (See IRM 25.27.1, Third Party Contacts).
At a minimum, to conduct a thorough audit of the books and records:
Determine if the books explain the organization's activities, income, expenditures, assets, and liabilities.
Identify LUQ transactions.
Reconcile amounts reported on returns to amounts totaled in the books and records.
Test the organization's books and records for reliability.
Evaluate how the organization is using its assets and resources.
Identify the source and nature of the organization's gross receipts.
Identify the relationships of persons doing business with the exempt organization.
Determine whether private interests are being served at the expense of the organization's exempt purposes.
Evaluate transactions such as purchases, sales, gifts, loans, expense reimbursements, etc.
Developing facts in a case also includes identifying and documenting transactions that result in:
Inurement (26 CFR 1-501(c)(3)-1(c)(2)).
Impermissible private benefit (26 CFR 1-501(c)(3)-1(d)(1)(ii)).
Excess benefit transactions (IRC 4958).
Self-dealing transactions (IRC 4941).
Determine whether a transaction is a listed or reportable transaction. These transactions warrant specialized audit procedures. For further information on:
Reportable transactions, see IRC 6707A(c).
Listed transactions, see 26 CFR 1.6011-4, IRC 4965(e)(2).
Abusive Tax Avoidance Transactions, see IRM 4.32, Abusive Transactions, and IRM 4.75.35, Fraud and Abusive Transaction Procedures.
Prohibited Tax Shelter Transactions, see IRC 4965.
Foreign grants, see the TE/GE intranet site Foreign Grants and Anti-Terrorism. Also see IRM 184.108.40.206, Financial Investigations Unit.
Prohibited Transactions applicable to IRC 501(c)(17) organizations, IRC 501(c)(18) organizations, and IRC 4948 foreign private foundations, see IRC 503 and IRC 4948.
Use judgment when gathering facts to support a given position. A case file’s weight and thickness aren’t indicators of a well-developed case.
Every document in the file should have some relevance; otherwise, omit it.
Index documents secured to the Form 5773, EO Workpaper Summary Continuation Sheet, and include a statement in the work papers showing how the documents support your conclusion. Index according to the indexing on Form 5772, EP/EO Workpaper Summary.
Documents may include:
Copies of minutes
Brochures describing activities
Copies of checks
Contracts and agreements directly relating to the issue
The degree to which you collect and record facts depends on the facts and circumstances of each case.
You discover by reviewing an organization’s publications that it’s engaging in substantial legislative activity. You have to support the unagreed issue. You should secure copies of all newsletters, minutes, or publications reflecting the legislative activities, regardless of the volume. Keep in mind, the case could go to Appeals or tax court. In either case, adequate documentation is needed to uphold the IRS’s position.
You briefly note each newsletter reviewed on a work paper entitled “Newsletter”. You note one article mentions an unallowable activity. You should make a copy of the article.
Determining whether an item is significant or material depends on your evaluation of a return as a whole and the items on the return. Consider these factors when determining whether an item is significant:
Comparative size of the item - an expense item of $6,000 would be considered large in comparison to the total expenses of $30,000; however, if total expenses were $300,000, the item would generally not be considered large.
Absolute size of the item - a $50,000 item may be significant even though it represents a small percentage of taxable income.
Inherent character of the item - although the amount of an item may be insignificant, the nature of the item may be significant (such as airline tickets claimed on a volunteer fire department’s return).
Evidence of intent to mislead - this may include missing or incomplete schedules, mis-classified entries, or obviously incorrect items on a return.
Beneficial effect of the way in which the organization reports an item - this may include expenses reported on Form 990-T that aren’t directly related to the production of the organization’s UBI.
Missing items - consider items which aren’t shown on the return but would normally appear on similar taxpayers’ returns.
Use sampling appropriately to enhance auditing the taxpayer’s books and records. See IRM 220.127.116.11.1, Sampling Techniques, for further details.
A fact is something that is indisputably the case. It is a truth that can be proven.
Evidence, on the other hand, is a means by which the truth of an alleged fact is proven or refuted. It’s something that furnishes proof.
During an audit, you gather facts and supporting evidence to correctly determine an organization’s status and tax liability.
You will base your determination on all available facts and evidence, including those that support the taxpayer’s position. The following discusses the two types of evidence (oral and documentary) you’ll encounter.
The IRC requires all taxpayers to keep adequate records. There are times, due to unusual circumstances, when records don’t exist. In these cases, oral testimony may be the only evidence available.
Follow these general guidelines when considering oral testimony:
Don’t use oral testimony in place of available documentary evidence.
Establish the credibility of the taxpayer. You can accomplish this by considering corroborative or contradictory evidence.
The taxpayer was able to prove payment of the loan in question and provided a travel log and receipts for the travel expenses shown on the return. The taxpayer has established credibility. You can, therefore, reasonably accept his/her oral testimony about the payment made for supplies even though he/she can’t produce receipts for that expense.
If you doubt the oral testimony, you should verify the facts from other sources of evidence (such as public records, third parties).
If the issue involves specific record keeping required by law (for example, IRC 274), then oral testimony alone can’t be substituted for necessary written documentation.
IRC 274(d) specifies record keeping rules required in certain situations. It’s permissible to allow a deduction without complete documentation if the taxpayer can show he or she has "substantially complied" with the adequate record keeping requirements (26 CFR 1.274-5(c)(2)(v)). Use your skill and judgment. Treat the taxpayer fairly, but don’t allow them to profit from failure to keep records.
When you interview a taxpayer or third party, and you learn information that is pertinent to your case, summarize the interview in writing. Prepare a summary of the conversation or taxpayer or witness statement (memorandum of interview) as a documentation of oral testimony.
The memorandum of interview should always contain:
Date, time and place of contact.
Name of parties present.
Description of what transpired.
Signature of taxpayer (or third party).
Signature of agent.
Send the written memorandum of interview to the taxpayer if he/she wasn’t the interviewee. The interviewee should confirm the accuracy before you send it to the taxpayer. By sharing the memorandum with the taxpayer, it can be included in the administrative record. If not, the memorandum of interview likely will not be admissible evidence in court.
A memorandum of interview can impeach the interviewee/witness in court if they deny having made the oral statement.
Sometimes we need a more formal written statement when documentation isn’t available and oral testimony significantly affects the case. If you think the case may eventually be resolved through litigation, consider using an affidavit to record taxpayer or third-party statements.
An affidavit is an attested statement and has great validity when properly prepared and voluntarily given. Affidavits may be used:
When other documentary evidence is unavailable.
When you want the taxpayer’s statements to become part of the case file.
To help gather complete and accurate information.
To record the testimony of a witness.
To prevent a taxpayer from changing testimony.
See IRM 18.104.22.168.2.1(4) for more information on affidavits.
Documents are another form of evidence.
Send documents you obtain from a third party to the taxpayer for comment so that they can become part of the administrative record.
In litigation, the court will likely admit both documentary evidence and oral testimony (in addition to the administrative record). Getting both documents and memoranda of interviews into the administrative record will ensure the court sees the relevant evidence.
Always try to obtain information voluntarily from taxpayers and third parties. However, in certain circumstances you may need to issue a summons.
Delegation Order 25-1, Summonses, Oaths, Certifications, and Related Functions, provides the delegated authority to issue a summons. See IRM 22.214.171.124, Delegation Order 25-1 (formerly DO-4, Rev. 23).
If you’re considering a summons, first discuss it with your group manager. The group manager or other supervisory official above that level must pre-authorize the issuance of the summons. See IRM 25.5, Summons, for detailed summons information and procedures.
The IDR enforcement process may culminate in a summons. See IRM 126.96.36.199.4, IDR Enforcement Process: Delinquency Notice.
Consult with Area Counsel for questions about a summons. See IRC 188.8.131.52.2, Issues to Bring to Counsel’s Attention.
The following types of summonses require pre-issuance review from Area Counsel:
Any summons involving a church or church records.
Any "John Doe" summons, or "dual purpose" summons. See IRM 184.108.40.206.1, Relevancy and Materiality of Summoned Information.
Summons issued in connection with a promoter investigation.
Summons issued in connection with ATAT or Listed Transactions.
Any summons issued to another federal agency or ITG (ITG must also be consulted).
FBAR Title 31 Summons. See IRM 4.26.17, Report of Foreign Bank and Financial Accounts (FBAR) Procedures.
Requests for audit or tax accrual work papers, tax reconciliation work papers, or any other privileged information document.
Summons involving potential trade secrets, protected information, software codes, and international transactions.
Any summons where the audit group is unsure whether it was prepared properly.
Occasionally you may need to apply special development procedures to confirm an exempt purpose or determine a tax liability. Special case-development procedures are discussed below.
Submit questions on procedural matters to the EO Examinations Mandatory Review mailbox at *TEGE EO Review Staff. Mandatory Review responds within three business days. When you submit questions to the mailbox:
Identify the research already conducted. State the research materials used and the tax law considered (such as IRM, court cases, senior agent, etc).
Provide only relevant information.
Don’t reveal the taxpayer’s identity.
Submit your technical questions to the K-Net at Knowledge Management Network.
Contact Area Counsel if you need legal advice to properly interpret and apply the Code. See IRM 220.127.116.11, Referral or Consultation with Counsel.
You many need help from specialists such as engineers or economists (for example, to confirm the value of property). When requesting help from specialists from other operating divisions, use the SRS at Specialist Referral System. (See IRM 18.104.22.168, Requesting Assistance from Specialists). This includes requests for:
Financial products specialists
Computer audit specialists
International language specialists
For further information on other speciality areas see the following:
For information on: See: Employee Benefit Plans Referrals IRM 22.214.171.124, Employee Benefit Plans Returns Fraud Referral Procedures IRM 126.96.36.199.1, Procedures Revoking an IRC 501(c)(3) that issued tax exempt bonds IRM 188.8.131.52.4.1, Referral to Tax Exempt Bonds (TEB) Referrals to other operating divisions IRM 184.108.40.206, Referrals to Other Operating Divisions Potential discrepancy adjustment on a return that is under audit by another operating division IRM 220.127.116.11.1, Examination Activities by other Operating Divisions Abusive Tax Avoidance Transactions IRM 4.75.35, Fraud and Abusive Transaction Procedures Collateral Audit IRM 18.104.22.168, Collateral Examination Church Audit Procedures IRM 4.76.7, Churches
A TAM is written, technical advice from Office of Associate Chief Counsel (TE/GE).
The authority for technical advice procedures is Rev. Proc. 2017-2 (updated annually).
For TAM procedures see IRM 4.75.36, Procedures for Processing Technical Advice Cases, and Rev. Proc. 2017-2.
IRC 6707A provides for a monetary penalty for failing to include on any return or statement, any information required to be disclosed under IRC 6011 and associated regulations regarding "reportable transactions." Currently a taxpayer’s participation in a "reportable transaction," including a "listed transaction," is disclosed on Form 8886, Reportable Transaction Disclosure Statement, or on Form 8886-T, Disclosure by Tax-Exempt Entity Regarding Prohibited Tax Shelter Transaction. This penalty may be imposed in addition to any other penalty that may be imposed (such as IRC 6662, accuracy related penalties) and applies without regard to whether the transaction ultimately results in an understatement. Refer to IRM 22.214.171.124, Penalty Handbook, Preparer, Promoter, Material Advisor Penalties, and IRM 4.32.4, Abusive Transactions, IRC 6707A Penalty for Failure to Include Reportable Transaction Information with Return. Refer to IRM 126.96.36.199 for information regarding rescission of the IRC 6707A penalty for failure to disclose participation in a "reportable transaction" that is not a "listed transaction."
Technical information about the IRC 6707A penalty, including how to identify reportable transactions, the grounds for imposing the penalty, and the statute of limitations, is contained in the associated technical guidance. For additional information please refer to http://mysbse.web.irs.gov/exam/tip/ajca/default.aspx. You should request assistance from SB/SE Counsel to determine if a transaction should have been disclosed pursuant to 26 CFR 1.6011-4, 53.6011-4, or 26 CFR 56.6011-4.
If the normal statute has expired under IRC 6501(a), written approval from SB/SE Counsel is required for support of the extended statute for a "listed transaction" under IRC 6501(c)(10).
The Affordable Care Act (March 23, 2010), Public Law No. 111-148 added IRC 45R to the Code. The law provides a tax credit to eligible small employers, including tax-exempt organizations that provide health insurance coverage to their employees. Find definitions and background information in:
Proposed Regulations sections 1.45R-0 through 1.45R-5 (78 FR 52719; 2013-38 IRB 211)
Rev. Proc. 2013-35
Rev. Rul. 2010-13
For tax-exempt employers, the tax credit under IRC 45R is a refundable credit based on premiums paid. If a tax-exempt employer appears to be eligible for the tax credit, you must inform the employer of its potential eligibility. If the employer wants to claim the tax credit, they can file with you Form 990-T, Exempt Organization Business Income Tax Return, and attach Form 8941, Credit for Small Employer Health Insurance Premiums. If Form 990-T has already been filed, the tax-exempt employer must file an amended Form 990-T with Form 8941 attached.
Refer tax-exempt employers to the online Estimator so they can get an estimate of the tax credit. This tool, developed by the Taxpayer Advocate Service, is online at: http://www.taxpayeradvocate.irs.gov/calculator/SBHCTC.htm#StartCalculator.
This calculation only gives an estimate of the credit. Neither you nor tax-exempt employers may rely on the its correctness. To determine the exact amount of the Small Business Health Care Tax Credit, tax-exempt employers must complete the Form 8941 and attach it along with the other appropriate forms and file it with Form 990-T.
See IRM 4.75.38, Exempt Organizations Examination Procedures - Small Employer Health Care Tax Credit Under Section 45R, for further instructions.
Fact gathering is complete after you’ve:
Interviewed taxpayers and third parties
Audited the books, records, and supporting documents
Researched questionable items
You seldom have all of the information you’d like to resolve an issue. Decide when you have enough to make a determination; the sooner you do, the sooner you can complete the case. This is less burdensome on you and the taxpayer.
Tax-exempt status and foundation status are based strictly on the laws that govern qualification for those statuses. Don’t consider collectibility when determining:
The continuation of tax-exempt status.
The appropriate foundation status.
Consider collectibility for certain types of tax audits, such as the audit of a converted return. See IRM 188.8.131.52, EO Enforcement Criteria. For collectibility guidelines on income tax audits, see IRM 184.108.40.206.6, Collectibility.
Attempt to resolve issues as the audit progresses.
Conclude all identified issues, as well as any issues raised by the taxpayer.
In arriving at a conclusion:
Make an impartial evaluation of all evidence.
Treat all taxpayers fairly and consistently.
Apply procedures and tax law fairly and consistently.
Correct mistakes made by the IRS.
Refuse to take unfair advantage of taxpayer mistakes or ignorance.
When you reach your conclusion for an issue, discuss it with the taxpayer or representative. Provide copies of work papers, if requested.
Ensure your work papers document the following:
Steps taken to arrive at your conclusion
See IRM 220.127.116.11, Arriving at Conclusions, for information on arriving at conclusion of income tax audits.
See IRM 18.104.22.168.1, Large Unusual or Questionable (LUQ) Items Defined for information on tax deficiencies tolerances.
Critical to the audit process is on-going communication with the taxpayer or the taxpayer's authorized representative. Frequently discuss the progress of the audit and proposed issues with the taxpayer. This can lead to an early resolution of both the issues and the case.
Fully develop adjustments before presenting them to the taxpayer or representative for review.
Use tact when explaining proposed changes or pointing out errors in the taxpayer's books or records.
Be patient in explaining the provisions of the law, bearing in mind that what is clear to you may not be clear to someone who doesn’t deal with exempt organizations in their occupation.
In change cases, consider providing a written summary of the issues to the taxpayer and representative. See IRM 4.75.15, EO Closing Letters and Reports of Examination, for further instructions on the initial and formal report procedures.
In non-declaratory judgment cases, you can opt to prepare an initial RAR if you reasonably expect to secure an agreement before having to issue a 30-day letter and formal RAR. The initial RAR will contain sufficient information to allow the taxpayer and the representative to understand the issues and why you are proposing the adjustment. See IRM 22.214.171.124.
In declaratory judgment issues, prepare a formal RAR. See IRM 126.96.36.199.
In potential revocation cases, discuss both the issues that jeopardize tax-exempt status and the impact on filing requirements, deductibility of contributions, income tax liability, IRC 403(b) plans, and any tax-exempt bonds.
Discuss substantive issues with the taxpayer or the representative in a face-to-face meeting. In some circumstances, a telephone conference or call may suffice.
Calculate any deficiency or over-assessment on the appropriate report forms. If you later discover an error in the report, you may mail a revised report to the taxpayer and representative rather than present the report in a face-to-face meeting.
Diligently secure timely responses from the taxpayer or representative.
An "alternative position" is a secondary position the IRS may ultimately rely on if the primary position isn’t upheld. You must address all alternative positions; Appeals won’t raise them if they don’t sustain the primary position. Therefore, thoroughly document the facts, law, taxpayer’s position and conclusion for all alternative positions if the primary position isn’t sustained.
If you are proposing an alternative position in an unagreed case, discuss it fully with the taxpayer or representative.
Present the alternative position at the end of Form 886-A, Explanation of Items, after the conclusion statement on the primary position. Label it as "Alternative Position" and follow the same issue, facts, law, taxpayer’s position, government’s position, and conclusion format.
If proposing revocation and the Form 990-T is also under audit, develop the unrelated business income tax issue as an alternative issue in the revocation report. The proposed revocation letter will include Form 990-T at the heading. See IRM 188.8.131.52, Effect on Form 990-T and Other EO Tax Examinations.
Mark on top of the basic report forms for the alternative issue “ALTERNATIVE POSITION” and include them in the audit report after the conclusion of the primary issue.
You discover an excessive amount of unrelated business income which places the main purpose of the organization into jeopardy. You propose revocation as the primary issue and UBI as an alternative issue in the report. If the revocation position fails in Appeals, the IRS can pursue the UBIT issue.
The closing conference with the taxpayer or their representative includes:
An explanation of your findings based on the facts and current law.
An explanation of proposed adjustments.
An explanation of appeal rights.
A solicitation of agreements.
Answering any questions and concerns.
Each closing conference situation is unique and techniques vary widely, but there are basic procedures to follow.
The closing conference is held once the examiner reaches conclusions on all issues.
Closing conferences will be productive if the taxpayer and representative are kept informed of the issues throughout the examination.
Closing conferences may be followed by a “managerial conference(s)”, which can be held anytime until the case closes. Managerial conferences are applicable primarily because the group manager did not attend the closing conference.
There can be more than one closing conference, and managerial conference.
Propose and discuss substantive issues with the organization or a representative in a face to face meeting. If economically unfeasible, hold a conference call.
You are conducting an audit of organization A located in a remote location, where in addition to flying to the closest large city, you drove for an additional six hours to get to your destination. After spending a week reviewing the records of the organization, you hold a closing conference. You inform A that aside from an agreed employment tax assessment for unreported employee fringe benefits, the case will close as a no change with advisory. Later, back at the office, your manager rejects the case back to you to change the audit results. You may hold any subsequent closing conference by phone.
Don’t issue an examination report to a taxpayer without discussing findings and issues with the organization or representative. Exceptions to this rule are for the following:
No-show / no-response appointments
You may mail a revised report to the organization rather than presenting it in a face to face meeting.
To facilitate discussion at closing conferences, you can provide the organization with a listing of items to be discussed.
Choose the order in which issues will be presented at the closing conference. You can modify the order during the conference. While there is no "right" order which is best for all occasions, resolve factual issues or issues involving an established application of law first. Discuss less certain issues last.
Closing conferences vary in the degree of formality. See the table below for areas to be covered.
Steps to take during the conference: 1. Discuss your findings with the organization or representative.
Be prepared to converse knowledgeably, explain proposed adjustments and provide the taxpayer with copies of relevant court cases, regulations, revenue rulings, revenue procedures, and workpapers showing computations. Instructions to returns and publications that explain and support regulations and rulings are also helpful, but are not citable as legal precedent.
2. Provide the organization or representative with the authority for your findings (law, argument and conclusion.) 3. Address any concerns from the organization or representative. Listen to the organization's officers / trustees / directors / representative(s). Get a clear understanding from all persons present that there are no pertinent facts other than those of which you are aware. State "This is my understanding. . .," and then detail the facts as you understand them. "Are we all in agreement on this? Are there any other material facts or circumstances of any consequence?" 4. Solicit an agreement from the organization or representative. In the case of non-declaratory judgment issues, this can be done by issuing an initial report of examination (RAR) where you reasonably expect an agreement. At the group's discretion an initial report may be bypassed in favor of issuing a formal RAR with 30-day letter, either at the conference, or after the conference by certified mail. 5. On agreed tax cases, solicit payment of tax, penalties and interest. For agreed revocations and disqualifications you can solicit income tax returns generally allowing up to 30 days, but you are not required to hold the primary return case file waiting for the returns. See IRM 184.108.40.206.1 for agreed adverse status changes. a. If the organization indicates an inability to pay the tax due at closing, discuss alternative payment methods. Offer an installment agreement if the organization meets the requirements. Use Form 9465, Installment Agreement Request, to solicit a payment agreement. See IRM 220.127.116.11.11 for more information. b. If the organization or representative agrees with the findings, but do can’t pay the deficiency immediately, explain that a statement for the deficiency plus interest will be mailed. Their cancelled check will be their receipt. Secure appropriate waivers and close the case. 6. On unagreed cases: a. Offer the organization a managerial conference. Also ensure the group manager’s contact information is on the 30-day letter. b. Determine if the case is wholly or partially agreed. c. Solicit the organization's position and basis in law for unagreed issues. d. Advise the organization of the appellate process and its appeal rights. e. You can issue a formal 30-day letter and RAR at the conference or after the conference by certified mail.
Document the conduct of a closing conference and managerial conference on Form 5464. Summarize the main result of the conference. If a closing conference was not held, explain why not on Form 5464. Details of the conference can be explained in the workpapers.
Generally, don’t mail an RAR to a taxpayer without discussing your findings, except for:
The taxpayer provides additional records for your consideration.
Refer to IRM 4.75.15, EO Closing Letters and Reports of Examination.
This subsection provides procedures and other information for identifying and properly resolving specific issues you may encounter during an audit.
The term, "revocation of tax-exempt status," for purposes of EO audits, means revocation of a ruling or determination letter granting tax-exempt status because an organization failed to meet the statutory requirements for continued recognition of tax-exempt status. See Rev. Proc. 2017-5 Section 12 (updated annually).
Organizations can also automatically lose exemption for failing to file annual EO information returns or Form 990-N, e-Postcard, for three consecutive tax years (IRC 6033(j)). For more information, see IRM 18.104.22.168.2, Auto Revocations Under IRC 6033(j).
If a proposed adverse revocation appears imminent during the conduct of the audit:
Expand the primary return audit to include primary returns for all subsequent tax years not barred for assessment, unless the facts and circumstances warrant not establishing those years.
Document the facts and circumstances for not expanding the primary return audit to subsequent tax years.
Prepare an administrative record.
. Consider the extent of voluntary correction of non-compliant activities in subsequent tax years.
If you expand the primary return audit to include subsequent tax years, you can focus that audit on determining:
The extent the noncompliant activities continue or were voluntarily corrected,
The potential converted tax liability (see IRM 22.214.171.124) for each affected tax year, or
Get your group manager’s approval to propose revocation.
When proposing revocation:
Inform the organization of activities or transactions that jeopardize tax-exemption.
Advise the organization of their appeal rights. See IRM 4.75.15, Closing Letters and Reports of Examination, Pub. 3498, The Examination Process, and Pub. 892, How to Appeal an IRS Decision on Tax Exempt Status, for more details on taxpayer appeal rights.
Create the administrative record. See IRM 4.75.32, Declaratory Judgment Cases and the Administrative Record.
Prepare a formal report. See IRM 126.96.36.199.1 and IRM 188.8.131.52.
Determine the course of action based on the taxpayer's reply to the formal report.
Determine whether you will prepare an information report Form 5666 or enforce income tax. See IRM 184.108.40.206.
Close all proposed revocation cases to Mandatory Review.
Agreed revocations become final when Mandatory Review concurs. Protested revocations become final when sustained by Appeals.
For revocations resulting from:
Inadequate records, see IRM 220.127.116.11.6.3, Revocation Due to Inadequate Records or Failure to Provide Requested Information.
Inability to locate a taxpayer, see tables at IRM 4.75.16-17, Closing Procedures for Unable to Locate Situations.
For information about revocations involving organizations in a group ruling, see IRM 18.104.22.168, Revocations.
Disqualification (or denial) of tax-exempt status applies to certain organizations under EO audit jurisdiction who have:
Not applied for tax-exempt status.
Not received a ruling or determination letter granting such status.
Treat disqualification of IRC 508(c) organizations that don’t apply for tax-exempt status and fail to qualify for exemption as revocations for all purposes (such as disposal code, etc.) for:
Churches, their integrated auxiliaries, and conventions or associations of churches.
Subordinate organizations in a group exemption ruling. See Treas. Reg. 1.508-1(a)(3).
Other organizations not required to apply for tax-exempt status under IRC 508(c).
Status 36 organizations are IRC 501(c) organizations (other than IRC 501(c)(3), IRC 501(c)(9), and IRC 501(c)(17)) that declare tax-exempt status by filing Form 990 or 990-EZ. If they fail to meet the qualification of tax-exempt status, disqualify them for the audited tax years for which they declared exemption. See:
IRM 22.214.171.124.9, Status 36 Cases
IRM 4.75.16-12, Status 36 Case Scenarios
IRM 4.75.16-13, Status 36 Case: Form 6018-A Instructions
IRM 4.75.16-14, Status 36 Case: Form 2363-A Instructions
Refer to IRM 126.96.36.199.3, for preparing reports for Status 36 organizations.
Disqualification also applies to IRC 501(c)(12) and IRC 501(c)(15) organizations for the tax years they fail their respective 85 percent member income test or gross receipts test for specific tax years.
The key to establishing the effective date of revocation is to determine when the organization first failed to qualify for exempt status.
Attempt to establish the date the organization first failed to qualify for its particular status by:
Interviewing the officers, employees, or members of the organization.
Inspecting the prior year returns.
Reviewing the determination file, if available.
Reviewing books and records for indications of the act(s).
If the organization failed to qualify for its particular status due to on-going activities, the effective date of revocation is the first day of the tax year in which the noncompliant activities began. Be sure to:
Document the nature of the act(s).
Determine when the activity first triggered the qualification issue.
If the organization failed to qualify for its particular status due to a specific act (or set of acts), the effective date of revocation is the date of the first act triggering the change. Be sure to document:
The nature of the act that caused the qualification issue.
The date of the act.
If the organization ceased to qualify for exemption during a prior year, get manager approval before expanding the audit.
In all cases, the effective date of revocation must be substantiated. Thus, if the audit is not expanded to prior tax years from which the noncompliant activities continued, the effective date of revocation is the first day of the first tax year under audit.
A revocation may qualify for relief from retroactive effect under IRC 7805(b). If the organization qualifies for relief under IRC 7805(b), the effective date of the revocation is prospective. See IRM 188.8.131.52.5 below.
For public charity reclassifications under IRC 509(a)(1) and IRC 170(b)(1)(A)(vi), and IRC 509(a)(2), verify the amounts on Form 990 Schedule A, Public Charity Status and Public Support.
If the calculation is incorrect, re-do the schedule.
Determine whether the organization meets the public support test.
If the organization fails a public support test for any two consecutive years beginning with its fifth year of existence, the effective date of reclassification is the first day of the second consecutive tax year the organization failed the public support test.
For special rules that apply to reclassifications of IRC 509(a)(1) and IRC 170(b)(1)(A)(vi), and IRC 509(a)(2) charities, see IRM 184.108.40.206.2, Reclassification of Foundation Status.
IRC 7805(b) provides discretionary authority to determine the extent to which any ruling may apply without retroactive effect. IRC 7805(b) relief applies to:
Determinations of liability for UBI
Determinations of liability for excise taxes
Private letter rulings
Technical advice issues
When an entity receives a determination letter or ruling, and later loses exemption due to a change in facts or law, revocation is effective the first day of the first tax year in which the change occurs. Under these circumstances, there is no need to request application of IRC 7805(b) relief.
When an entity erroneously receives a determination letter or ruling due to an omission or misstatement of material facts, the effective date of revocation is the first day of the first tax year. In this case, don’t recommend relief under IRC 7805(b). It’s generally not available.
When an entity erroneously receives a determination letter or ruling due to an IRS misinterpretation of the law, recommend IRC 7805(b) relief.
The following table recaps the situations described above:
Entity’s Determination Letter revoked due to: Revocation effective date: IRC 7805(b) Applicability: Change in tax law or organization alters its operation after initial recognition of exemption First day of first tax year in which organization altered its operations or the law changed Not necessary, but taxpayer may request a TAM if disputing whether it altered its operations Omission or misstatement of material facts by the applicant organization Retroactive to the first day of the first tax year Not Available Misinterpretation of law by IRS Determined by IRC 7805(b) relief Applies. Recommend requesting relief
You or the organization may raise the question of IRC 7805(b) relief.
For proposed revocations, disqualifications or reclassification from a public charity to a private foundation, bring the taxpayer current on their filing and tax obligations by either:
Preparing Form 5666 information report (see IRM 220.127.116.11.6).
Securing a "converted tax return" accepted as filed (see IRM 18.104.22.168).
Adjusting the secured converted tax return (see IRM 22.214.171.124.1).
Establishing an substitute for converted tax return (see IRM 126.96.36.199).
Refer to IRM 4.75.31, Conversion of Returns, for specific procedures.
If the taxpayer doesn’t maintain adequate books and records, discuss the inadequacies with your group manager. Determine whether to issue an "Inadequate Records Notice." See IRM 188.8.131.52.6, Inadequate Records.
For an organization’s initial or continuing exempt status, Section 406 of the Protecting Americans from Tax Hikes Act of 2015 (PATH Act), P.L. 114-113, expands declaratory judgment rights under IRC 7428 to:
All IRC 501(c) organizations regardless of paragraph
IRC 501(d) organizations
Based on the PATH Act, all revoked or disqualified exempt organizations, and reclassifications of foundation status have declaratory judgment rights.
The PATH Act also applies to disqualifications of tax-exempt status on a year-to-year basis for IRC 501(c)(12) or IRC 501(c)(15) organizations that fail their respective 85 percent member income test or gross receipts test for a particular tax year.
As a result of these expanded rights, modification of tax-exempt status, such as modifying a recognized section 501(c)(4) exemption to a section 501(c)(7), no longer applies.
Share all documentary evidence and statements relevant to the loss of tax-exempt status with the organization. Doing so allows the documents to be included in the administrative record.
You can't change a private foundation to a public charity, unless the initial classification is shown to be an error by the IRS. You can only terminate a private foundation status under IRC 507.
Refer to IRM 4.75.32, Declaratory Judgment Cases and the Administrative Record, for information on IRC 7428 and assembling the administrative record.
Examination groups may place certain cases in group suspense pending a needed administrative or judicial action or decision. Managers may place cases in AIMS status code 39, Suspense in Group, only under the following conditions:
Requests for Technical Advice Memorandum. See IRM 184.108.40.206, Formal Request For Technical Advice.
Audits interrupted by federally declared disasters impacting the organization. IRM 25.16.1, Program Guidelines.
Request by the Area Manager and agreed by the Manager, EPR. The written request must include a list of all of the related cases to place in status 39, an explanation of reason the cases have been delayed, and an estimated closure date.
Group suspense statuses other than Status 39 include:
Cases transferred to Area Counsel (AIMS status code 25).
Cases transferred to Joint Committee (AIMS status code 21).
Criminal referral cases accepted by Criminal Investigations (AIMS status code 18).
Grand Jury Suspense (AIMS status code 36).
The group charged with a return in suspense is responsible for protecting the statute of limitations for assessment.
Cases involving issue(s) that have nationwide impact or those within a particular judicial jurisdiction are, at times, suspended to ensure consistent treatment of the issue(s). This includes cases having the same issue or one similar to one in a case awaiting final action by EO Technical or the Office of the Chief Counsel (TE/GE).
Send "suspense cases" to Mandatory Review using Form 1254, Examination Suspense Report.
The group manager advises the manager, Mandatory Review, of any statutes that expired.
Complete the following before you send the case to Mandatory Review:
Resolve all other audit issues.
Ensure the statute is protected for at least one year.
Prepare the Form 1254. Change references to "SB/SE, Technical Services Group Manager" to "TE/GE EO Exam Mandatory Review Manager," using the Adobe Touch Up Text Tool.
Prepare and mail Letter 3617, Action on Return - Exempt Organization, to the taxpayer explaining the reason for suspended action on the return.
Mandatory Review places the Forms 1254 in suspense using AIMS status code 30.
Until you receive advice, don’t take action on the case other than actions to protect the statute.
When a final decision is made on an issue in suspense, Mandatory Review returns the case files to the originating Area with:
A synopsis of the decision.
Refer to IRM 4.75.34, Procedures for Disposition of IRC 501(p) Cases, for specific procedures.
Other useful IRMs include:
IRM 220.127.116.11, Financial Investigation Unit
IRM 25.4.1, Potentially Dangerous Taxpayer
IRM 25.4.2, Caution Upon Contact Taxpayer
IRC 6601(d) and IRC 6611(f) restricts the amount of interest charged on deficiencies and paid on refunds respectively, in the following situations:
NOL carrybacks under IRC 172(b)
Capital loss carrybacks under IRC 1212
Business credit carrybacks under IRC 39
Foreign tax credit carryback under IRC 904 as amend by P.L. 94-455 Sec. 1901(a)(114)
When working a case:
Identify situations when restricted interest applies.
Determine if Form 2285, Concurrent Determinations of Deficiencies, is required.
Form 2285 is required when one or more of the following are present:
Loss or credit carrybacks from more than one year are carried back to the same year.
Current year adjustments result in more than $100 in tax and there is a carryback loss or credit from at least one subsequent year.
Both general adjustments and restricted interest adjustments are involved.
Form 2285 isn’t required when:
A taxpayer protests an unagreed case to Appeals.
A taxpayer petitions tax court.
The only adjustment on the RAR is a single year carryback.
Exhibit 4.75.13-1 provides different scenarios to help determine when Form 2285 is required.
If you can’t determine if Form 2285 is needed, contact the Restricted Interest Coordinator at *TE/GE-EO-EPR Digest to discuss.
If you determine Form 2285 isn’t required, prepare Form 3198-A"other instructions" section of as shown in Exhibit 4.75.13-1. Close the case using normal closing procedures as described in IRM 4.75.16, Case Closing Procedures.
If you determine a Form 2285 is required:
Send an email to the TE/GE-EO-EPR Digest mailbox. A special reviewer will work with you while your case is still in your inventory.
If the form is required, the special reviewer will complete the form.
Place the reviewer completed form in your case file.
Prepare the “other instructions” section of Form 3198-A. See examples in Exhibit 4.75.13-1.
Close the case using normal using closing procedures in IRM 4.75.16.
See IRM 20.2.8, Restricted Interest, for more information on restricted interest.
You may find during an audit or compliance check that an organization has become inactive. Inactive organizations present unique processing challenges:
An organization subject to IRC 6033(j) auto revocation. See IRM 18.104.22.168.2, Auto Revocations Under IRC 6033(j).
A terminated organization. See IRM 22.214.171.124.10, Terminations.
An unable to locate organization. See IRM 126.96.36.199, Unable to Locate.
Some inactive organizations may not be filing the required Form 990 series information returns or Form 990-N. Thus, automatic revocation by the IRS Service Center may preempt completion of the audit.
If an inactive organization not automatically revoked (i.e., files Form 990-N each year) doesn’t voluntarily terminate its existence, propose a revocation if it:
Hasn’t consistently operated
Has shown no concrete plans to operate
Has shown no reasonable acts or steps to begin operations
Consistent inactivity constitutes a failure to meet the requirements for the tax-exempt status granted. Determine consistency after considering all the facts and circumstances unique to each case. For example, lack of any activity over a period of five years in some cases may be regarded as consistent inactivity.
If you must propose a revocation of an inactive IRC 501(c)(3) publicly supported organization not automatically revoked that doesn’t voluntarily terminate, first propose a reclassification to a private foundation if:
It is in existence for more than five years.
Has failed the public support test for two consecutive tax years.
Doesn’t otherwise qualify for one of the other exclusions from private foundation status.
If you decide not to propose a revocation of an inactive organization, issue a no change advisory to the organization.
If the inactive organization will retain exemption, secure any delinquent returns. See IRM 188.8.131.52.5, Inactive Organizations.
A critical part of issue development is accurate research. The conclusions you reach must reflect correct application of the law, regulations, court cases, revenue rulings, etc.
The TE/GE Knowledge Management portal provides a series of networks (K-Nets) for employees and managers who share a common interest, need, or expertise in a given technical issue. See IRM 184.108.40.206.2.
Refer to IRM 220.127.116.11, Researching Tax Law, for information on researching and citing federal tax law. It provides profiles of various tax authorities and helps you become familiar with the most common, but by no means all, sources or available research techniques.
IRM 18.104.22.168.1, Internal Revenue Code
IRM 22.214.171.124.2, Committee Reports
IRM 126.96.36.199.3, Code of Federal Regulations
IRM 188.8.131.52.4, Internal Revenue Bulletin
IRM 184.108.40.206.5, Cumulative Bulletin
IRM 220.127.116.11.6, Revenue Rulings and Procedures
IRM 18.104.22.168.7, Bulletin Index-Digest System
IRM 22.214.171.124.8, IRS Publications
IRM 126.96.36.199.9, Court Decisions and Case Law
IRM 188.8.131.52.10, Private Letter Rulings and Technical Advice Memorandums
IRM 184.108.40.206.11, General Counsel Memorandums
IRM 220.127.116.11.12, Technical Memorandums
Research of case law isn’t complete until you review the citator. For example, you must consider if:
The case is current.
There are other cases on point that should be considered.
The ruling is still valid.
The revenue procedure has been modified.
A citator lists the history on cases, revenue rulings, and procedures.
Citators are published by commercial publishers of tax services such as CCH Incorporated and Research Institute of America. While formats differ, commercial citators provide basically the same information.
Refer to IRM 18.104.22.168.9.7, Citators: Researching Case History, for general information on citators.
You have a wide-range of tax literature to use when developing an issue. Monthly publications such as "The Exempt Organization Tax Review" , published by Tax Analysts, provide articles exclusively about tax matters for exempt organizations.
See available tax services from commercial publishers that provide explanations and annotations on a variety of exempt organization tax issues (such as CCH "Exempt Organization Reports" , Bloomberg BNA "Tax Management Portfolios" ). You can research these using LexisNexis or Westlaw.
Use on-line sites and services as your primary way to research tax.
IRS contracts with commercial vendors (such as LexisNexis and Westlaw) supply electronic access to extensive legal research libraries.
Employees who require LexisNexis, Westlaw, or other electronic research must obtain a user profile.
Request access to these services through On-Line 5081:
In the "Application Name" field type the name of the service and click search.
When the results appear, select the application that applies to your specific organization.
For training and other assistance, access Electronic Research Training.
You can access LexisNexis at http://www.lexisnexis.com or though the IRS intranet site at http://www.lexisnexis.com/clients/irshome/. These two addresses access the same LexisNexis database, use the same customer ID number, and have the same basic features. The main difference is the IRS intranet site provides quick links to commonly used sources.
You can access Westlaw at http://www.westlaw.com, or http://tax.westlaw.com. These two addresses access the same Westlaw database, use the same customer ID number, with a slightly different emphasis in the search features provided. The main difference is the tax website provides a search feature that searches multiple commonly used separate databases at the same time.
SPDER teamed with LexisNexis to provide employees with a complete IRM in an easy to research electronic format.
Find tutorials and help using the on-line version of the IRM at http://irm.web.irs.gov.
Accurint, a LexisNexis product offers online access to asset/locator information through an easy to use interface. It gives customized reports with:
Real and personal property data
Motor vehicle information
State corporation data
Personal credit header data
Business credit reports
Request access to Accurint through Online 5081:
In the "Application Name" field type "Accurint" and click search.
When the results appear, select the application that applies to your specific organization.
Visit Accurint Information for further details on Accurint.
The GuideStar web-site provides the three most recently filed Form 990, 990-PF, and other useful information about the operations and finances of nonprofit organizations.
You must obtain a user profile and password to access Forms 990 at the web-site GuideStar.org.
The Foundation Center website at FoundationCenter.org also offers Form 990 and Form 990-PF images as PDF documents.
The On-Line Statistics of Income EO Image Net (SEIN) system, is an internal web site provided by the Statistics of Income Division. It provides the original, unredacted images of forms:
990, Return of Organization Exempt from Income Tax
990-EZ, Short Form Return of Organization Exempt from Income Tax
990-PF, Return of Private Foundation or Section 4947(a)(1) Trust Treated as Private Foundation
1120-POL, U.S. Income Tax Return for Certain Political Organizations
4720, Return of Certain Excise Taxes on Charities and Other Persons Under Chapters 41 and 42 of the IRC
8871, Political Organization Notice of Section 527 Status
8872, Political Organization Report of Contribution and Expenditures
Due to site license limitations, access to On-Line SEIN may be limited and requires an approved request via Online 5081.
For groups having only one or two people with access to the system, research requests require management approval.
|Organization X timely filed a Form 990-T, Exempt Organization Business Income Tax Return, for the taxable year ended 12/31/2012 reporting $15,000 taxable income with taxes due of $2,250.|
|As a result of an audit of the Form 990-T for the taxable year ending 12/31/2012, you reduce deductible expenses by $20,000. You compute corrected taxable income as follows:|
|Income as shown on the return||15,000|
|Plus decrease in expenses||20,000|
|Corrected taxable income||35,000|
|The audit results in a deficiency of $3,000.|
|This is not a restricted interest case. The reduction in expenses is a current year adjustment.|
|A Form 2285 is not required.|
|You are not required to enter any statements regarding interest on a Form 3198-A, TE/GE Special Handling Notice.|
|Organization X timely filed a Form 990-T, Exempt Organization Business Income Tax Return, for the taxable year ended 12/31/2012 reporting $15,000 taxable income with taxes due of $2,250.|
|As a result of an audit of the Form 990-T for the taxable year ended 12/31/2012, you allow a NOL carryback of $4,000 from the year ended 12/31/2013. You make no other adjustments. You compute corrected taxable income as follows:|
|Income as shown on the return||15,000|
|Minus the NOL carryback from 2013||4,000|
|Corrected taxable income||11,000|
|The NOL carryback adjustment results in an over-assessment of $600.|
|This is a restricted interest case.|
|A Form 2285 is not required because the NOL carryback was from a single subsequent year and there were no current year adjustments or other carrybacks.|
|Form 3198-A is required. Prepare a Form 3198-A and notate in bold letters in the "Other Instructions" section "Restricted Interest IRC §6611(f). No Form 2285 is required."|
|Organization X timely filed a Form 990-T, Exempt Organization Business Income Tax Return, for the taxable year ended 12/31/2011 reporting $15,000 taxable income with taxes due of $2,250.|
|As a result of an audit of the Form 990-T for the taxable year ended 12/31/2011, you allow NOL carrybacks of $4,000 and $6,000 from the years ended 12/31/2012 and 12/31/2013, respectively. You make no other adjustments. You compute corrected taxable income as follows:|
|Income as shown on the return||15,000|
|Minus the NOL carryback from 2012||4,000|
|Minus the NOL carryback from 2013||6,000|
|Corrected taxable income||5,000|
|The adjustments result in an over-assessment of $1,500 in taxes, a decrease of $600 from the NOL carryback from the year ended 12/31/2012 and a decrease of $900 from the NOL carryback from 12/31/2013.|
|This is a restricted interest case.|
|A Form 2285 is required because there are carrybacks from 2 succeeding years.|
|Form 3198-A is required. Prepare a Form 3198-A and notate in bold letters in the "Other Instructions" section "Restricted Interest IRC §6611(f). Form 2285 is required."|
|Organization X timely filed a Form 990-T, Exempt Organization Business Income Tax Return, for 201212 reporting $15,000 taxable income with taxes due of $2,250.|
|As a result of an audit of the Form 990-T for the taxable year ended 12/31/2012, you reduce deductible expenses by $20,000 and allow a NOL carryback of $4,000 from the year ended 12/31/2013. You compute corrected taxable income as follows:|
|Income as shown on the return||15,000|
|Plus decrease in expenses||20,000|
|Minus the NOL carryback from 2013||4,000|
|Corrected taxable income||31,000|
|The adjustments result in a deficiency of $2,400 in taxes, a $3,000 increase from the decrease in expenses in the audit year and a decrease of $600 from the NOL carryback from 12/31/2013.|
|A Form 2285 is required because there is a current year adjustment and a restricted interest adjustment from a succeeding year.|
|In restricted interest cases, like the one in this example, involving current year adjustments and a restricted interest adjustment, prepare a Form 3198-A and notate in bold letters in the "Other Instructions" section "Restricted Interest IRC 6601(d). Form 2285 is required."|
|Organization X timely filed a Form 990-T, Exempt Organization Business Income Tax Return, for the taxable year ended 12/31/2012 reporting no taxable income.|
|As a result of an audit of the Form 990-T for the taxable year ended 12/31/2012, you reduce deductible expenses by $20,000 and allow a NOL carryback of $20,000 from the year ended 12/31/2013. You compute the corrected taxable income for the year ended 12/31/2012 as follows:|
|Income as shown on the return||0|
|Plus current year adjustments||20,000|
|Minus the NOL carryback from 2013||20,000|
|Corrected taxable income||0|
|The current year adjustment, the decrease in expenses, is offset by the NOL carryback from 12/31/2013 so there is no tax as a result of the adjustments. However, the current year adjustments create a phantom tax until the NOL is available for carryback. Interest is due on this phantom tax even though there is no tax deficiency.|
|A Form 2285 is required because there is a current year adjustment and a carryback loss from a succeeding year.|
|Form 3198-A is required. On the Form 3198-A notate in bold letters in the "Other Instructions" section "Assess restricted interest only - no tax deficiency. See Form 2285."|