Accessibility Skip to Top Navigation Skip to Main Content Home  |  Change Text Size  |  Contact IRS  |  About IRS  |  Site Map  |  Español  |  Help  

4.19.13  General Case Development and Resolution

Manual Transmittal

December 02, 2011

Purpose

(1) This transmits a revised IRM 4.19.13, Liability Determination, General Case Development and Resolution.

Scope

This section contains information on Examination general procedures for administrative matters and provides a reference for common issues and related items that might be found on tax returns. Throughout this revision are references to other IRMs which may contain related information needed when working cases.

Material Changes

(1) Editorial changes made throughout this IRM.

(2) IRM 4.19.13.5.1:, IRC Section 6404(g), Suspension of Interest and Certain Penalties, Updating (k) on alpha list to Update IRM reference

(3) IRM 4.19.13.5.1(2):, IRC Section 6404(g), Suspension of Interest and Certain Penalties, Revising last sentence of section (2)

(4) IRM 4.19.13.5.2:, Managerial Approval of Penalties, Update 2(c) to change name of IRM for 2/10 year bans

(5) IRM 4.19.13.5.3:, Penalty Lead Sheet Preparation, Rewording paragraph 4 for Substantial Understatement Penalty

(6) IRM 4.19.13.5.3(4): ,Penalty Lead Sheet Preparation, Rewording last sentence

(7) IRM 4.19.13.6:, Initial Contact, Reworded 6(2) concerning RGS

(8) IRM 4.19.13.7:, Power of Attorney and Other Third Party Authorizations, Updated If/Then table adding 2nd line for CAF procedures

(9) IRM 4.19.13.8:, IRC 7602(c)(1) Third Party Contacts, Change to Third Party Contacts

(10) IRM 4.19.13.8(1):, IRC 7602(c)(1) Third Party Contacts, Rewording sentence dealing with Third Party Contacts

(11) IRM 4.19.13.9:, Taxpayer Replies, Reworded paragraph concerning telephone contacts at bottom of table and added it under reminder

(12) IRM 4.19.13.9.5 & 5.2:, Correspondence or Return Received on Closed Examinations Not Meeting Audit Reconsideration Criteria, Updated dates for First Read under (1) and (2)

(13) IRM 4.19.13.9.5.3:, Replies received on Closed Claims, including to Letter 105C and 106C, Added 2nd line to If/Then table for disallowed claims

(14) IRM 4.19.13.11:, No Response and Unagreed Cases, Added IRM reference under (1)(a) and updated under table (1)(c)

(15) IRM 4.19.13.12:, Statutory Notices, Added x-ref IRM under paragraph (3) and IRM name change under paragraph (4)

(16) IRM 4.19.13.18(2):, Offers in Compromise, Change wording of 'accounts receivable' to 'liabilities'

(17) IRM 4.19.13.21:, Informant Claims, IRM name change in para (1)

(18) IRM 4.19.13.25(1):, Identity Theft, Rewording first sentence

(19) IRM 4.19.13.25(9) &(10): ,Identity Theft, Adding description of Letter 239C to both sections

(20) IRM 4.19.13.27: ,Campus Exam Closing Actions, Updated If/Then table regarding Campus closing actions

(21) IRM 4.19.13.15(5): ,Docketed Cases - Updated procedures.

(22) IRM 4.19.13.15.1: ,Docketed Cases Status 90 - Added new subsection.

(23) IRM 4.19.13.5.2: ,Managerial Approval of Penalties, Added new subsection

(24) IRM 4.19.13.19: , Bankruptcy, updated freeze code

(25) IRM 4.19.13.20: ,Combat Zone, Revised Combat Zone Procedures

(26) IRM 4.19.13.5(5) and (6):, Workpapers for all Cases, Updated procedures for renaming reports in RGS/CEAS

Effect on Other Documents

IRM 4.19.13, General Case Development and Resolution, dated January 1, 2011, is superseded. This IRM also incorporates the following IRM Procedural Updates: 110066, 110092, 110277, 110333, 110340, 110354, 110429, 110445, 110476, 110537, 110563, 110579, 110699, 110834, 110893, 110911, 110917, 110966, 110977, 111033, 111051, 111220, 111238, 111256, 111416, 111520, 11U1667.

Audience

This IRM is intended for the use of the SB/SE (Small Business/Self-employed) and W&I (Wage and Investment) Campus Examination Operations.

Effective Date

(01-01-2012)

James P. Clifford
Acting Director, Reporting Compliance
Wage and Investment Division

4.19.13.1  (01-01-2012)
Standard Procedures

  1. Standard examination procedures apply to all cases and include:

    1. Initiating examinations (including the use of initial contact letters)

    2. Dealing with Powers of Attorney

    3. Preparing audit forms, Form 4549, Form 4549-EZ, Income Tax Examination Changes, Form 886 (Series), etc.

    4. Handling undeliverable correspondence

    5. Responding to taxpayers' replies

    6. Following workpaper guidelines

    7. Handling special situations

    8. Adjusting penalties

    9. Performing follow-up actions

    10. Resolving No Response and Unagreed cases

    11. Issuing Statutory Notices

    12. Performing close out procedures

    13. Addressing statute control

    14. Monitoring QMS (Quality Measuring System) responsibilities (Manager, Examiner, Clerk)

    15. Following procedures for Fraud Referrals from Campuses to the Area Office Fraud Detection function

    16. Following procedures for Taxpayer Advocate Service Referrals

4.19.13.1.1  (01-01-2012)
Program and Source Codes

  1. The following are Correspondence Examination Programs with corresponding Source Codes:

    Program and Source Codes
    Correspondence Examination Program Source Code
    Alternative Minimum Tax 26
    Alimony 06
    Claims 30, 31, 32, 35
    Criminal Investigation (CI) Referrals, i.e. Questionable Refund Program (QRP), Preparer Schemes, Return Preparer Analysis Tool (RPAT) 06, 08, 11, 70
    Dependent Database 06
    DIF( Discriminant Function) CORR (Correspondence) Source 02 or 06
    DUPTIN (Duplicate Taxpayer Identification Number) (EITC (Earned Income Tax Credit) and Non-EITC) 06
    EITC Ban Penalties (2 and 10 .) 06
    EITC Certification Programs 06
    EITC Recertification (Non-Claims – i.e., Project Code 0027, 0028, 0257, or 0694) 06
    Employee Returns 46
    Erroneous Refund 20
    Estate and Gift Tax No Source Code
    Federal/State Cooperative 77
    Filing Analysis Module (FAM) Production 06
    Health Coverage Tax Credit Advanced Credit and Year End 06
    Health Coverage Tax Credit Claims 30
    Health Coverage Tax Credit Unallowables 03
    High Underreporter Referrals 14
    Ineligible (EITCRA) (Earned Income Tax Credit Referral Automation) 70
    Informants 70
    Information Returns 85
    Math Clerical Abatement 06
    Math Error Program 06
    Married Filing Separately 06
    Multiple Filer Source 04
    Non-Filers (i.e., TDI (Taxpayer Delinquency Investigation) Non-Filers, AEITC (Advance Earned Income Tax Credit) Non-Filers) 24
    Non-Filers – High Income Non-Filers Only (>$200K in Income) 25
    Qualified Personal Service Corporation No Source Code
    Research Programs and Tests 11
    Self Employment Tax 08
    Substitute For Return 24
    Taxable Gain on Sale of Residence 11
    Taxpayer Requests (i.e., Prompt Assessment Requests) 73
    Tip Income (Filed Returns) 06
    Tip Income (Non-Filers) 24
    Unallowable Items 03 or 48

  2. For a complete listing of all Source Codes available to Examination, please refer to IRM 4.4.1, AIMS/Processing Handbook – Introduction, Exhibit 4.4.1–19, Source Codes, and Document 6209, IRS Processing Codes and Information.

4.19.13.2  (01-01-2012)
Seven Auditing Standards

  1. The seven auditing standards outline the criteria determined to produce a quality examination and are guidelines to assist examiners in completion of all cases. The seven auditing standards are used in conjunction with the applicable program procedures for evaluating case quality.

4.19.13.2.1  (01-01-2012)
Standard 1 — Adequate Consideration of Significant Issues

  1. Purpose: This standard measures whether consideration is given to the Classified/Program as well as large, unusual or questionable (LUQ) items during the course of the examination.

  2. Overview: Consideration of all significant tax issues during the examination is required.

  3. The following table shows the key elements of Auditing Standard 1.

    Key Elements of Auditing Standard 1
    Key Elements Details
    Classified/Program Items Considered All Classified/Program Items (including flow-through adjustments for TEFRA (Tax Equity and Fiscal Responsibility Act )/Non-TEFRA) were considered.
    Scope of Examination was Appropriate Scope of Examination was limited or expanded to the point that all LUQ items were properly considered for the correct determination of tax liability. The scope of the examination should stay within the scope of the issues identified by Headquarters or the issues identified during manual classification. Consult your manager and secure approval to expand or limit the scope of the examination when other LUQ issues are present. The workpapers must reflect this decision. Sound judgment must be exercised when, in the course of the examination, additional issues appear to warrant expanding the examination.
    Consideration of Prior/Subsequent Year Returns Prior/Subsequent year returns containing the same or correlative issues as in the year examined were considered and/or pursued when appropriate. Computational adjustments to carryback/carryovers were considered.

4.19.13.2.2  (01-01-2012)
Standard 2 — Examination Depth and Conclusions Reached

  1. Purpose: This standard measures whether the examined issues are completed to the extent necessary to provide the examiner sufficient information to determine the substantially correct tax based on the correct application of tax law.

  2. Overview: The depth of the examination is determined through inquiry, observation, and analysis of appropriate source documents, oral testimony, contacts etc., to ensure full development of relevant facts concerning significant issues. Conclusions are supported by applicable law, Regulations, court cases, Revenue Rulings, etc.

  3. The following table shows the key elements of Auditing Standard 2.

    Key Elements of Auditing Standard 2
    Key Elements Details
    Adequate Examination Techniques Used Appropriate examination techniques were utilized (e.g., oral testimony, inquiry, observation or analysis). The taxpayer’s records were reconciled to the tax return: taxpayer’s Schedule K-1 was reconciled to the tax return; sampling techniques were used; proper source documents were requested and evaluated; and taxpayer and/or third party contacts were made when appropriate.
    Correct Conclusions Reached The case file reflected application, interpretation, and explanation of applicable law, derived from developed facts and circumstances.

4.19.13.2.3  (01-01-2012)
Standard 3 — Workpapers Support Conclusions

  1. Purpose: This standard measures documentation of the scope, depth, and conclusions reached in the examination.

  2. Overview: The workpapers provide the principal support for the examiner’s report and document the procedures applied, information obtained, and conclusions reached in the examination.

  3. The following table shows the key elements of Auditing Standard 3.

    Key Elements of Auditing Standard 3
    Key Elements Details
    Fully Disclose Examination Procedures, Audit Trail, Findings, and Conclusions The workpapers disclosed the scope, depth, judgment, examination techniques, and findings used in the examination of each significant item and the conclusions reached.
    Adjustments in Workpapers Agree with Report Adjustments in workpapers were reflected on the examination report if there is a report, or with the case disposition/case actions.
    Examination Activities Adequately Documented
    • The case actions or contacts were adequately documented (e.g., changes to entity information were recognized/updated). The case file showed complete and accurate documentation of case history (e.g., taxpayer, representative, or third party contacts as well as examination research).

    • Taxpayer/Representative telephone numbers were recorded and updated when necessary.

4.19.13.2.4  (01-01-2012)
Standard 4 — Report Writing Procedures Followed

  1. Purpose: This standard measures the presentation of the examination findings in terms of content, format, and accuracy.

  2. Overview: This standard addresses the written presentation of examination findings in terms of content, format, and accuracy.

  3. The following table shows the key elements of Auditing Standard 4.

    Key Elements of Auditing Standard 4
    Key Elements Details
    Applicable Report Writing Procedures Followed Applicable report writing procedures including consideration of automatic adjustments and alternative positions were followed. Explanations, schedules, and attachments to the report were accurate, clear, concise, legible, and grammatically correct.
    Correct Tax Computation The tax computation was correct and used the method most beneficial to the taxpayer. All prior adjustments to the tax return were considered, including math corrections, amended returns and previous audit adjustments. Prior audit adjustments impacting base period income were considered in computing income averaging.
    Correct Credit Computation The credit computation was correct and used the method most beneficial to the taxpayer.

4.19.13.2.5  (01-01-2012)
Standard 5 — Penalties Properly Considered

  1. Purpose: This standard measures whether applicable penalties are considered and applied correctly.

  2. Overview: The application of appropriate penalties is required to be considered during all examinations.

  3. The following table shows the key elements of Auditing Standard 5.

    Key Elements of Auditing Standard 5
    Key Elements Details
    Recognized, Considered and Applied Correctly The case reflected consideration of and, if applicable, assertion of all applicable penalties. Indicators of fraud were recognized and a referral was made, if warranted. The case file was documented sufficiently to support the decision whether or not to assert any penalties. Penalties that were assessed were abated when the audit resulted in a tax decrease.
    Computed Correctly The penalties were computed correctly.

4.19.13.2.6  (01-01-2012)
Standard 6 — Timely Actions

  1. Purpose: This standard measures the utilization of time as it relates to the examination process.

  2. Overview: Timeliness of actions during the examination process is an essential component of each examination. Actions are initiated and completed within established time frames.

  3. The following table shows the key elements of Auditing Standard 6.

    Key Elements of Auditing Standard 6
    Key Elements Details
    Examination Actions Timely All requests for documentation/information/signature completed within established time frames and provided a date for response.
    Examination Response Timely
    • Paper response to taxpayer reply was made within established time frames (initial response 30 days).

    • Phone response to taxpayer telephone inquiries within established time frames (3 business days).

4.19.13.2.7  (01-01-2012)
Standard 7 — Case Administration

  1. Purpose: This standard measures whether the administrative aspects of the case are addressed.

  2. Overview: This standard encompasses correspondence, statute control, case assembly, Power-of-Attorney (POA) disclosure procedures and closing procedures.

  3. The following table shows the key elements of Auditing Standard 7.

    Key Elements of Auditing Standard 7
    Key Elements Details
    Correspondence The appropriate letter was used to respond to the taxpayer’s inquiry or to notify the taxpayer of the results of the examination. Letters mailed on cases from Campus Correspondence Examination inventory will include the appropriate BOD (Business Operating Division) corporate toll free number, "Tax Examiner" as person to contact and the site specific identification number. The correspondence is legible, grammatically correct, addressed all issues and was sent to the correct address. Any attachments sent with the letters will include the same contact information, such as the Form 4549, etc.
    Statute Control Followed The appropriate consent to extend the statute of limitations was prepared correctly and secured timely; consents were executed by authorized parties. Form 895, Notice of Statute Expiration, and/or statute identification procedures were followed in accordance with IRM procedures.
    Case Assembly All original documents were returned to the taxpayer.
    Case Completion Form 5344, Examination Closing Record, IDRS (Integrated Data Retrieval System) research (e.g., AIMS (Audit Information Management System), PCS (Partnership Control System), CFOL (Corporate Files On Line), TXMOD (Tax Module), etc.) inputs and updates were accurately completed in accordance with IRM procedures.
    POA/Disclosure Procedures Followed CAF (Centralized Authorization File) researched and POA (Power of Attorney) properly recognized and processed in accordance with IRM procedures. Examiner complied with disclosure guidelines involving third party contact.

4.19.13.3  (01-01-2012)
Researching Cases

  1. Prior to taking action on a case (initiating, purging, working replies, or closing), examiners must perform IDRS research to check the validity of current AIMS data and to ensure that no activity has been taken on the taxpayer’s account that may affect the case under examination. Examiners should research to verify the accuracy of items on the return when appropriate. All applicable research performed must be documented on Form 4700, Examination Workpapers. The following chart contains guidelines and is not all inclusive. For additional information regarding the command codes listed, examiners should refer to Document 6209, IRS Processing Codes and Information.

    Command Codes
    To Determine: Research through IDRS Command Code(s) and Definer(s)
    Full AIMS display including:
    • Mail received date

    • Current/prior AIMS Status

    • AIMS Freeze Codes

    • Primary Business Code

    • Employee Group Code

    • Project Code

    AMDISA
    Taxpayer’s phone number ENMOD
    Taxpayer current address AMDISA, INOLES, IMFOLE, ENMOD, BMFOLE
    Taxpayer's pending address ENMOD
    Taxpayer’s prior address RTVUE, TRDBV, IRPTRO
    Statute expiration date TXMODA, AMDISA, IMFOLT, BMFOLT
    Date return was received TXMODA, AMDISA, IMFOLT, RTVUE, BMFOLT
    Any secured amended returns TXMODA, AMDISA, IMFOLT,BMFOLT
    Master File Freeze Codes TXMODA, IMFOLT, SUMRY, IMFOLI, BMFOLE, BMFOLT
    Refund status TXMODA, IMFOLT, BMFOLT
    Status of account TXMODA, IMFOLT, SUMRY, BMFOLT
    Other adjustments TXMODA, IMFOLT, IMFOLA, BMFOLA
    IDRS control assignment TXMODA, SUMRY

    Note:

    If TXMOD is not available, then IMFOL has the most current information available. When conducting research, do not use MFREQ to generate a TXMOD if it is not available.

    Recertification indicator present IMFOLE, ENMOD, INOLES
    Spouse’s SSN (Social Security Number) INOLE, IMFOLT, ENMOD, RTVUE, TRDBV
    Taxpayer’s name control (SSA (Social Security Administration) information) INOLE
    Pending transactions TXMODA, ENMOD, SUMRY
    Date of birth INOLES, RTVUE, DDBKD, TRDBV, MFTRAU
    Past filing status INOLE, IMFOLI
    Any other SSNs under which taxpayers have filed returns INOLE
    Duplicate use of SSN for EITC, Exemption DUPOL, DDBKD
    Dependent Database rules that have fired DDBOL
    Citizenship Code DDBKD, MFTRAU
    Cross-reference SSN on duplicate condition DDBOL, DUPOL, DDBKD
    KIDLINK (child’s Social Security application which indicates parents) DDBKD, MFTRAU
    Power of Attorney/Tax Information Authorization indicator AMDISA, TXMOD, IMFOLT, CFINK, BMFOLT
    Income, withholding, and certain expenses (e.g., mortgage interest paid, higher education expenses) IRPTRO
    Purported relationship of dependents TRDBV
    SSN (e.g., for child’s parent) NAMES
    Annotations on Form 1040. U.S. Individual Income Tax Return, (e.g., identification of Other Income on Line 21 and Employee Business Expense on Schedule. A.) TRDBV

  2. Research all related CEAS (Correspondence Examination Automation Support) records including any for prior or subsequent tax years, or cross-reference taxpayers to determine if they contain information relevant to the issues under examination.

  3. For issues that can be potentially claimed in multiple years (for example, First-time Home Buyer Credit), check related years to ensure the issue was not allowed in a related year, prior to allowing it for the year under examination.

4.19.13.3.1  (01-01-2012)
Requesting Amended Returns

  1. When research results show that a taxpayer has filed an amended return, the amended return must be requested to determine the impact on the examination. The amended return may contain information directly related to the examination or change other items on the return.

  2. The following actions must be taken to request the amended return:

    Requesting Amended Returns
    If And Then
    TXMOD reflects a TC (Transaction Code) 97X with no subsequent TC 29X Open IDRS control is on TXMOD Contact the person that has the open control to request that the return be forwarded for incorporation into the examination.
    TXMOD reflects a TC 97X with or without subsequent TC 29X No open IDRS control on TXMOD Check AMS (Audit Management System) for the CIS (Correspondence Imaging System) document.
    1. If a CIS document exists, print or request CIS document and proceed with examination.

    2. If a CIS document does not exist, ESTAB the TC97X DLN (Document Locator Number). Suspend case for 21 days. If document is not received or Form 4251, Return Charge-Out, states it is not in Files, do a special search. Allow 21 days for special search to be returned. If returned without document, request a copy from the TP (Taxpayer) using 418C, Amended/Original Return Unavailable, Copy Requested, letter. Use paragraphs I, and W when corresponding to the TP. Allow 15 days for TP response. Suspend case for 30 days.

4.19.13.4  (01-01-2012)
Report Generation Software (RGS) System

  1. For helpful information regarding downloading, new developments, system updates, read me files, etc., refer to these RGS (Report Generation Software System) website links:

    • Systems Administrators — http://rgs.web.irs.gov/sa/rgssa.htm

    • Campus Users — http://rgs.web.irs.gov/users/rgsws1.htm

    • Campus User Guides - http://rgs.web.irs.gov/users/training/campus.htm

  2. RGS/CEAS is utilized in the examination process to compute proposed tax adjustments, interest, and penalties. It has three permission levels: Manager, Examiner and Clerk. It generates various forms, letters and audit reports for mail out to the taxpayer. It allows examiners and reviewers the ability to document their actions and findings and stores the archived examination results. CEAS notes can be input on individual records, documenting telephone conversations with taxpayers. It creates numerous reports that can be printed to assist in monitoring inventories, from individual to operation levels. The various types of inventory reports include but are not limited to; weekly receipts, closures, case updates, weekly purges, aged inventory, discrepancies between AIMS and RGS/CEAS, etc.

  3. UCP (Unattended Case Processing)/ACE (Automated Correspondence Exam) receive data from the Dependent Database (DDb) and AM424 files to create the RGS/CEAS record in one of the designated RGS/CEAS processing "B" groups. See IRM 4.19.20, Automated Correspondence Exam (ACE) Processing Overview, for additional information. When UCP/ACE creates the RGS record:

    • In Group B0, the system will systemically compute the tax, generate all the letters and reports needed for printing at the Consolidated Print Site (CPS), create work center files and inventory records.

    • In Group B1, the system will only create the work center files and inventory records. These cases need to be manually worked on RGS/CEAS by a tax examiner.

    • In Group B2, the system provides all of the functionality of B0 except fCPS mail out. B2 audit reports require a manual review prior to issuing to the taxpayer. After the reports and letters are reviewed, the letters are mailed locally and the cases are placed into group B0 for aging to the next status.

  4. A copy of all letters (with the exception of Letter 692 and Letter 555), reports, revised reports, Form 886-A, case history and workpaper documents are saved to the RGS/CEAS electronic case file. Refer to IRM 4.19.13.17, Case File Assembly, for additional information.

    Note:

    Workpapers on all cases must be appropriately annotated to include all actions taken on the case. See IRM 4.19.13.5, Workpapers for All Cases.

4.19.13.5  (01-01-2012)
Workpapers for All Cases

  1. Cases established and worked through UCP Processing will have workpapers systemically created and annotated with actions completed. If B0, and the taxpayer does not respond to any correspondence, the RGS/CEAS system will automatically continue to annotate workpapers through the closing process. No manual tax examiner entries are required unless a response is received from the taxpayer. If B1, workpapers are initiated through RGS/CEAS and the tax examiners must continually update all actions taken.

  2. On all cases where tax examiners must make entries, include the following information:

    1. Taxpayer's name, address, and SSN

    2. Tax year examined

    3. Date(s) work paper prepared

    4. Name of examiner

    5. Standard Employee Identifier (SEID). The SEID must precede the examiner's remarks in the "Conclusion" section.

    6. Questionable items/issues

    7. Nature and date of correspondence to include reason for acceptance or non-acceptance and additional documentation needed if the correspondence received was not sufficient

    8. Decision and reason for determination on income tax liability based on applicable tax law

    9. Decision and reason regarding whether or not to impose the Failure to File and Failure to Pay penalties.

    10. Decision and reason to impose or not impose the EITC-two year ban (This standard applies if the taxpayer is being examined for EITC issues).

    11. Consideration of the return-preparer penalty (if applicable). See IRM 4.19.10.6.1 Return Preparer Penalties for more information

    12. Taxpayer's home, work, and cell numbers (if available)

    13. Address Change

    14. Accuracy-related penalty consideration to include a reference to the applicable Penalty Lead Sheet

    15. If POA is on file for the taxpayer, annotate the POA’s name, address, telephone number, and Centralized Authorization File (CAF) number. If no POA is on file, no annotation is required.

    16. Telephone attempts (See IRM 4.19.13.9, Taxpayer Replies, for more information.)

    17. IDRS/Research conducted.

  3. Work paper documentation is extremely important. Ensure all adjustments are fully explained. Include the reasons for any penalties that are assessed and the taxpayer’s explanations. This documentation is very important, especially if interest abatement or burden of proof ever become issues. Work papers should show that examiners:

    1. Developed case appropriately.

    2. Performed the applicable tests.

    3. Considered fully all factors in making the determinations of an issue, and

    4. Applied tax law correctly based on the facts of the case.

  4. Document any third party contacts. A record of these contacts will be periodically provided to the taxpayer. Provide this information upon request of the taxpayer.

  5. For cases that are not worked in RGS, keep a copy of previous reports that have been modified — clearly marking old reports with an "X" .

  6. For cases worked in RGS, do not print out old reports. There will be no case folder. Annotate the Case History to indicate that a revised report was sent to the taxpayer. Save any revised reports under "Case File Documents." Rename the revised report using the following format: "Form4549MMDDYYYY" . Use the report revision date as the date of the report.

  7. Consistency in preparing workpapers is critical in the examination process. The use of standard abbreviations and acronyms aid in consistency. Only the abbreviations and acronyms listed below may be used when preparing examination workpapers.

    Acronyms
    Abbreviation/Acronym Definition
    AC Action Code or Activity Code
    ACCT Account
    ACE Automated Correspondence Exam
    ACTC Additional Child Tax Credit
    ADDL Additional
    ADDR Address
    ADJ Adjustment
    AGI Adjusted Gross Income
    AIMS Audit Information Management System
    AMT Alternative Minimum Tax
    Amt. Amount
    AO Area Office
    AP Adjustment Pending
    ASED Assessment Statute Expiration Date
    ASFR Automated Substitute for Return
    ATAO Application for Tax Assistance Order
    ATIN Adopted Taxpayer Identification Number
    ATTY Attorney
    AUR Automated Underreporter
    BC Birth Certificate
    BOD Business Operating Division
    CAF Centralized Authorization File
    CAT A Category A
    CC Closing Code/Command Code (will depend on context)
    CCC Child and Dependent Care Credit
    CEAS Correspondence Examination Automation Support
    CET Correspondence Examination Technician
    CHG Change
    CI Criminal Investigation
    CIS Correspondence Imaging System
    CK Check
    COMP Compensation
    CORR Correspondence
    CPA Certified Public Accounting
    CRD Correspondence Received Date
    CRN Credit Reference Number
    CSED Collection Statute Expiration Date
    CTC Child Tax Credit
    CY Calendar Year
    CZ Combat Zone
    DC Disposal Code
    DECD Deceased
    DEF Deferred
    DEP Dependent
    DOB Date of Birth
    DOC/DOCS Document(s)
    DOD Date of Death
    DUPTIN Duplicate TIN
    DV Disclosure Verified
    EBE Employee Business Expense
    EDU Education
    EGC Employee Group Code
    EITC Earned Income Tax Credit
    EMP Employee
    EXAM Examination
    EXEMP Exemption
    EXP Expense
    EXT Extension
    F Form
    FEMA Federal Emergency Management Agency
    FERDI Federal Employee/Retiree Delinquency Initiative
    FFC Functional Fraud Coordinator
    FIFO First-In First-Out
    FMV Fair Market Value
    FRV Frivolous Filer
    FS Filing Status
    FTF Failure to File
    FTHBC First Time Homebuyers Credit
    FTP Failure to Pay
    FY Fiscal year
    HC Hold Code
    HCTC Health Care Tax Credit
    HHS Health and Human Services
    HIP Health Insurance Premium
    HOH Head of Household
    HSH Household Help
    HUD Department of Housing and Urban Development
    IA Installment Agreement
    ICL Initial Contact Letter
    ID Identification
    IDRS Integrated Data Retrieval System
    Immun. Immunization
    INC Income
    INCL Including
    INFO Information
    INT Interest
    IRA Individual Retirement Account
    IRC Internal Revenue Code
    IRM Internal Revenue Manual
    ITIN Individual Tax Identification Number
    K Thousand dollars

    Example:

    2K = $2,000

    KITA Killed in Terrorist Action
    LEM Law Enforcement Manual
    LTR Letter
    LTRC Long-Time Resident Credit
    LUQ Large Unusual Questionable
    ME Math Error
    MED Medical
    MF Master File
    MFJ Married Filing Joint
    MFS Married Filing Separate
    MFT Master File Transaction
    MIC Mortgage Interest Credit
    MSG Message
    MTG Mortgage
    MWPC Making Work Pay Credit
    NA Not Applicable
    NEC Non-Employee Compensation
    NF Non-filer
    NM CHG Name Change
    OIC Offer In Compromise
    ORG Organization
    PC Project Code
    PD Paid
    PH# Phone Number
    PN Pending
    POA Power of Attorney
    PREV ADJ Previously Adjusted
    PSSN Primary SSN
    PUB Publication
    PY Prior Year
    QC Qualifying Child
    QRP Questionable Refund Program
    RCPT Receipt
    RECD Received
    RECON Audit Reconsideration
    REG Regulation
    REQ Request
    RES Residency
    REV Revenue
    Rev. Rul. Revenue Ruling
    RPAT Return Preparer Analysis Tool
    RRC Rebate Recovery Credit
    RTN Return
    SC Status Code/Source Code (will depend on context)
    SCH Schedule
    SDC Scheme Development Center
    SE Self-employed
    SERP Servicewide Electronic Research Program
    SET Self Employment Tax
    SFR Substitute For Return
    SNOD Statutory Notice of Deficiency
    SS Social Security
    SSA Social Security Administration
    SSN Social Security Number
    SSSN Secondary Social Security Number
    ST Status
    STAT Statutory
    STMT Statement
    TAC Taxpayer Assistance Centers
    TAS Taxpayer Advocate Services
    TC Transaction Code
    TE Tax Examiner
    TETR Telephone Excise Tax Refund
    TIN Taxpayer Identification Number
    TP Taxpayer
    TPH Taxpayer's husband
    TPW Taxpayer's wife
    TPXH Taxpayer's Ex-husband
    TPXW Taxpayer's Ex-wife
    TREAS Treasury
    TXI Taxable Income
    TXPD Tax Period
    TY Tax year
    UNDEL Undeliverable
    UP Unpostable
    UPC Unpostable Code
    UTIL Utilities
    W/H Withholding
    W/O Without
    XREF Cross Reference
    YR Year

4.19.13.5.1  (01-01-2012)
IRC Section 6404(g) Suspension of Interest and Certain Penalties

  1. IRC Section 6404(g) suspends interest and certain penalties in cases where the Service fails to provide a notice of liability to the taxpayer within the specified time period.

  2. In the case of an individual who files a timely return, the Service generally has 36 months (18 months for notices prior to November 26, 2007), beginning on the later of:

    1. The date the return is filed; or

    2. The due date of the return without regard to extensions,

    in which to provide notice to the taxpayer specifically stating the taxpayer’s liability and the basis for the liability. See IRM 20.2.7.6 , IRC 6404(g) Interest Suspension and Treas. Reg. 301–6404–4, for detailed rules on IRC 6404(g) and its notice deadlines for the Service.

  3. If the notice is not provided to the taxpayer before the close of the 36 month period (18 months for notices prior to November 26, 2007), interest and certain penalties are suspended for the following period:

    1. Beginning on the day after the close of the 36 month period, (18 months for notices prior to November 26, 2007) and

    2. Ending on the date which is 21 days after the date on which notice is provided to the taxpayer.

  4. The notice must specifically state the liability and the basis for the liability.

  5. The suspension applies to tax years ending after July 22, 1998.

  6. IRM 20.2.7, Abatement and Suspension of Interest, contains information on when and how to input a TC 971 AC 064 on these cases.

4.19.13.5.2  (01-01-2012)
Managerial Approval of Penalties

  1. For notices issued and penalties assessed after June 30, 2001, each notice of penalty must include the name of the penalty, the IRC section for the penalty, and a computation of the penalty. In the case of any notice of penalty issued after June 30, 2001, and before July 1, 2003, these requirements shall be met if such notice contains a telephone number at which the taxpayer can request a copy of the taxpayer’s assessment and payment history with respect to such penalty.

  2. For penalties assessed after June 30, 2001, prior to assessment of any penalty, written supervisory approval is required by the immediate manager or higher-level official over the employee initially proposing the penalty.

    1. Penalties assessed under IRC Section 6651 (Failure to File/Failure to Pay), IRC Section 6654 (Failure to Pay Estimated Income Tax), and IRC Section 6655 (Failure by a Corporation to Pay Estimated Income Tax) are excluded from this requirement.

    2. Any other penalty automatically calculated through electronic means is also excluded from this requirement. IRC Section 6702 penalties for frivolous tax submissions require written supervisory approval.

    3. See IRM 4.19.14.6.1, EITC 2/10 Year Ban, and IRM 20.1.5.2.1, Two and Ten Year Bans on Claiming the Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC), for more information.

    4. Manager must indicate their approval of the penalty by inputting a non-action note on CEAS.

  3. Penalty Lead Sheet Documentation:

    1. Examiners must document the applicable penalty lead sheet to indicate the procedures used, information obtained, and conclusions reached during the examination. In addition, examiners must indicate the reasons for the assertion or non-assertion of the penalty.

    2. Penalties should not be asserted without an explanation. The explanation must be tailored to agree with the facts and circumstances of the case. Standard statements such as "negligence penalty deemed not to be applicable" are not sufficient.

    3. The Service is now requiring a managerial review on the non-assertion of penalties when there is a substantial understatement of tax. See IRM 20.1.5.8, IRC Section 6662(d): Substantial Understatement, for substantial understatement criteria. A CEAS non-action note must be input to indicate the manager's concurrence regarding the non-assertion of the penalty.

    4. As part of the examiner’s workload review, managers should review the non-assertion of penalties when there is a substantial understatement of tax under IRC 6662(d).

    5. For examination adjustments that clearly do not involve penalties, a brief statement to that effect is sufficient.

    6. For more information on penalty lead sheet procedures see IRM 4.19.13.5.3, Penalty Lead Sheet Preparation.

4.19.13.5.3  (01-01-2012)
Penalty Lead Sheet Preparation

  1. To ensure that the IRS applies accuracy related penalties in a consistent and impartial manner, Exam employees must complete penalty lead sheets on all cases worked through deficiency procedures.

  2. The accuracy-related penalties most frequently asserted by examiners are:

    1. IRC Section 6662(b)(1) and (c): Negligence or disregard of rules and regulations, and

    2. IRC Section 6662(b)(2) and (d): Substantial understatement of income tax.

  3. Lead sheets must be prepared:

    1. With the status 22 report (if the report was prepared manually),

    2. After each reply, or

    3. Whenever there is an adjustment to the original report.

  4. The Substantial Understatement Penalty must be considered and the substantial understatement lead sheet must be prepared on all cases with deficiencies greater than $5,000.00.

  5. Lead sheets are not required on cases worked solely through automated means (for example, no-response cases worked through ACE or BLP).

    Note:

    As a rule, penalties should be asserted before the issuance of the Statutory Notice of Deficiency (SNOD).

  6. Before completing the lead sheets, examiners must review:

    1. The taxpayer's prior audit history (Research CEAS/IDRS for the previous audit history),

    2. The proportion of the questioned items in relation to other items on the return, (for example, the proportion of the taxpayer's income to the items in question), and

    3. Taxpayer correspondence

  7. Only one accuracy-related penalty may apply to an item at a time. When more than one penalty applies, assert the penalty with the strongest position and document the alternative position on a separate lead sheet.

  8. On all cases requiring lead sheets, examiners must address the following issues;

    1. Audit Steps: Steps 1 and 2 must be addressed on all lead sheets. Step 4 must be addressed on the Negligence lead sheet if the answer to audit Step 1 or 2 is "yes" .

    2. Case Facts: Update the lead sheet to reflect the facts that support the assertion/non-assertion of the penalty. The facts must be specific to the circumstances of the case.

    3. Conclusion: The following guidelines should be used:

      Penalty/Lead Sheet
      If Then
      The examiner determines that penalties should not be asserted The conclusion must clearly state why penalties are not appropriate based on the case facts and the applicable penalty standard. General statements, such as "Penalties deemed inapplicable" are not appropriate.
      The examiner determines that penalties should be asserted. The conclusion must clearly state why penalties are appropriate based on the facts and circumstances of the case.

      Note:

      Lead sheets must clearly explain the examiner's basis for the assertion or non-assertion of accuracy-related penalties.

    4. Taxpayer Position: the taxpayer's position must be addressed if the taxpayer responds to the Exam report and addresses the underpayment in the response. If the taxpayer does not respond to the Exam report, the examiner must enter, "No Response."

4.19.13.5.3.1  (12-17-2010)
Additional Information

  1. For more information on penalties, please refer to:

    • IRM 20.1.1-1 - Penalty Policy Statement 20-1

    • IRM 20.1.1.3.1 - Unsigned or Oral Requests for Penalty Relief

    • IRM 20.1.5.6.1 - Reasonable Cause

    • IRM 20.1.5.7 - IRC Section 6662(c); Negligence or Disregard of Rules or Regulations

    • IRM 20.1.5.8 - IRC section 6662(d): Substantial Understatement

    • IRM 4.19.10.6.1 - Return Preparer Penalties

    • IRM 4.19.13.2.5 - Standard 5 - Penalties Properly Considered

    • IRM 4.19.13.5.2 - Managerial Approval of Penalties

    • Treas. Reg. 1.6662-3(b)(1) and (2) - Definitions of Negligence and Disregard of Rules or Regulations

    • Treas. Reg. 1.6662-4 - Substantial Understatement

4.19.13.6  (01-01-2012)
Initial Contact

  1. Unless otherwise noted, send an initial contact letter explaining the issue(s) under examination. Take the following steps:

    • If requesting information only, use Letter 566 or

    • If proposing correction(s) to the account and asking for agreement and verification of the issue(s), use Letter 525 with an audit report, Form 4549, Income Tax Examination Changes).

    Reminder:

    Ensure appropriate Power of Attorney (POA)/ Tax Information Authorization (TIA) contacts are made. Do not include inserts of publications, public notices or blank forms with Letter 937. IRM 4.19.13.7, Power of Attorney and Other Third Party Authorizations, for more information.

  2. It is imperative the examiner verify if the case was created on RGS. If the case is not on RGS, follow the procedures in IRM 4.10.15 Examination of Returns, Report Generation Software (RGS) to create the case. After the case file is prepared, the examiner must annotate the actions taken, in Case History, (e.g. type of letter sent, date of letter, time spent working case, and the examiner's initials).

  3. Suspend action on the case awaiting taxpayer response. The suspense period begins with the date of the initial contact letter. Refer to IRM 4.19.10.1.6.1, Standard Suspense Periods for Correspondence Examination, for the appropriate suspense period for most letters. See IRM 4.19.16.1.4.1 , Claims Contact Procedures, for claims case suspense.

4.19.13.7  (01-01-2012)
Power of Attorney and Other Third Party Authorizations

  1. Refer to IRM 21.3.7, Processing Third Party Authorizations onto the Centralized Authorization File (CAF), for additional information as well as the SERP IRM Supplement, Power of Attorney/Third Party Authorizations Toolkit.

  2. Research the Central Authorization File (CAF) for all cases to determine if there is a valid Power of Attorney (POA) or Tax Information Authorization (TIA) for the tax return under examination.

    Guidelines for Processing Powers of Attorney
    If Then
    The taxpayer sends a properly executed:
    • Form 2848, Power of Attorney and Declaration of Representative, or

    • Form 8821, Tax Information Authorization,

    • Consult IRM 21.3.7, Processing Third Party Authorizations onto the Centralized Authorization File (CAF), or the Power of Attorney/Third Party Authorizations Toolkit for processing procedures if the POA/TIA is not on the CAF.

    The document provided by the taxpayer matches an authorization already on the CAF Do not fax it for processing:
    • Retain the authorization for the file if the case is assigned to you.

    • Input a CEAS action note with the POA's/TIA's name and address if the case is not assigned to you.

    A general/durable POA is received without a Form 2848,
    • Advise the POA to file a Form 2848, (following the proper routing instructions for the form), so that the authorization will post on a Servicewide system. Otherwise, only Exam personnel will have access to the information for the duration of the audit.

    • Retain the authorization for the file and input a CEAS action with the POA's name and address. If the case is not assigned to you, forward the document to the controlling Exam group.

    A POA/TIA with the authority to receive notices is on file for the tax return under examination,
    • Annotate the POA section of the workpapers with the POA’s/TIA’s name and address as shown on the CAF, as recorded by a phone assistor via CEAS note, or per the document in hand.

    • Send the POA/TIA copies of all correspondence sent to the taxpayer using Letter 937 but do not include inserts (e.g., Publication 3498-A, The Examination Process (Examinations by Mail), Notice 1155, Disaster Relief from the IRS, blank Form 1040-X, Amended U.S. Individual Income Tax Return, etc.) other than the return envelope with the package for mailing as these inserts are readily available to tax professionals.

    • (Manual cases only) Annotate Form 3198, Special Handling Notice for Examination Case Processing, and check "yes" on the workpapers.

    No POA/TIA with notice authority is on file for the return under examination, No workpaper annotation is required.

  3. A TIA does not grant a third party appointee the authority to represent a taxpayer before the Service. A POA can have limited powers as well. It is important to review Form 2848, Form 8821, or the coding on the CAF to ensure the third party’s authority is not exceeded. The Third Party Designee (Check Box) authority on Form 1040/Form 1040A/Form 1040EZ, U.S. Individual Income Tax Return, does not apply to Compliance issues, including those under Examination.

4.19.13.8  (01-01-2012)
IRC 7602(c)(1) Third Party Contacts

  1. When third party contact is applicable, follow the procedures outlined in IRM 4.10.1.6.12, Third Party Contacts — Background. Use Letter 3164 (SC) to notify the taxpayer when initiating a request for contact with a third party.

4.19.13.9  (01-01-2012)
Taxpayer Replies

  1. Perform first read screening on all taxpayer replies received in Examination within 2 work days.

  2. Letter 4476 will generate on all cases when AIMS is updated to a mail status, 54, 55, 57 or 24 (with a CRD ).

  3. All replies should be worked consistently using the following guidelines:

    Guidelines for Working Taxpayer Replies
    If Then
    Taxpayer asks a question or the information requested is not case related Make a photocopy, mark area with the question or request and route to adjustment correspondence.
    The case should be referred to the Taxpayer Advocate Service (TAS) See IRM 4.19.13.23, Taxpayer Advocate Service (TAS) Procedures.
    A Form 911, Request for Taxpayer Assistance (And Application for Taxpayer Assistance Order), is received from the taxpayer Expedite the form to the TAS Office in the Campus.
    A Form 14027-B, Identity Theft Case Referral, is received Route the form to the Exam ID Theft Liaison for prioritization and assignment. See IRM 4.19.13.25, Identity Theft.
    A Form 14039, Identity Theft Affidavit, is received or attached with other documents from the taxpayer Associate with case file and assign to tax examiner for priority ID theft processing. See IRM 4.19.13.25, Identity Theft.
    Reply relates to case Associate replies with case file within five business days of receipt in the Operation and update AIMS to correct Status Code, 54, 55, or 57, or add the Correspondence Received Date to Status 24 cases. Use the appropriate forms and follow special handling procedures.
    Reply is 30 days old or older Acknowledgment letter is sent advising taxpayer reply received and answer will be issued within 30 days (every effort must be made to respond within 30 days).
    Reply needs technical assistance or evaluation of records sent by taxpayer Assign to tax examiner on first in first out basis with frozen refunds taking priority.
    Reply is a signed agreement (either a signature on the designated line of the report or a signature anywhere in the correspondence that includes taxpayer comments that show agreement)

    Note:

    If the taxpayer attaches documentation to the signed report, the case should not be worked as a signed agreed. Update the case to reply status and work accordingly.

    Update the case to Status 51, complete Form 5344, Examination Closing Record, and close as agreed within 14 calendar days of receipt in the Operation.

    Reminder:

    On joint return cases, both signatures must be secured unless the deficiency is full paid. Statutory Notice of Deficiency procedures must be used for unagreed spouse if deficiency is not full paid.

    Note:

    See IRM 4.19.13.11, No Response and Unagreed Cases, if a payment is received after a 90 day letter is issued but no signed agreement is received from the taxpayer.

    Taxpayer requests correction with no remittance. Issue Letter 692 and revised report, if necessary.
    Remittance is attached to reply and was not deposited by Receipt and Control Branch with a TC 640. Follow instructions in the IRM 3.10.5, Campus Mail and Work Control, ACE/Block Tracking System (BBTS) and IRM 4.4.24, Payments and Remittances, to dispose of remittance.
    Request is for additional explanation. Forward to tax examiner to prepare correspondence to taxpayer (attempt should be made to reach taxpayer by telephone if the number has been provided or can be found on ENMOD).
    Reply contains explanation of items questioned. Analyze information provided and process accordingly.
    Reply agrees with deficiency and taxpayer requests an installment agreement or states that he/she is unable to pay the proposed tax. Document the taxpayer's request for an installment agreement or the taxpayer's statement that he/she is unable to pay the tax. Forward the installment agreement or other document requesting an installment agreement and a copy of the proposed examination report (Form 4549, Income Tax Examination Changes / Form 4549-EZ), Income Tax Examination Changes, to the co-located Compliance Service Collection Operation (CSCO).
    Documents received from the taxpayer are original documents. Photocopy the documents for the case file and return the original documents to the taxpayer.

    Reminder:

    On all types of cases, if taxpayer’s telephone number is available, and if the documentation received does not revise the exam report, then, if warranted, the taxpayer should be called instead of sending Letter 692 . However, if attempts to reach the taxpayer by telephone were unsuccessful, send Letter 692. All telephone contacts must be documented in workpapers. The workpapers must include the following information: a) the date and time of the call; and b) The issues discussed. For an effective audit trail this entry must be as specific as possible. If the examiner determines that telephone contact is not warranted, the reasons must be clearly stated in the workpapers. Telephone contact should also be attempted, if warranted, after issuance of Notice of Deficiency if less than 15 days until default and information submitted is not sufficient to make a change.

     

4.19.13.9.1  (01-01-2012)
Taxpayer Responses — Additional Information Needed

  1. Please see the "If And Then" Chart below on how to work the taxpayer responses. See IRM 4.19.10.1.6.1, Standard Suspense Periods for Correspondence Examination, for suspension periods applicable to the various statuses and time frames for issuing letters/notices.

    Guidelines for Working Taxpayer Responses When Additional Information is Needed
    If And Then
    Taxpayer replies to Letter 566 or any initial contact letter in which the audit report was not issued with the letter Additional information is needed
    • Send Letter 525 with a Form 4549 / Form 4549-EZ, Income Tax Examination Changes.

    • Update case to Status 22.

    • Tell taxpayer why the information he sent is not sufficient and what is still needed.

    • State the "Correspondence Received Date" in the body of the Form 886-A, Explanation of Items, while acknowledging taxpayer reply.

    Taxpayer replies to Letter 566-B, Letter 566-B-EZ or Letter 525, or Letter 1862 Additional information is needed and the report is revised
    • Send Letter 692 with revised report, Form 4549/Form 4549-EZ.

    • Update case to Status 23.

    • Tell taxpayer why the information received is insufficient and what information is still needed.

    Taxpayer replies to CP 75 or CP 75A Taxpayer contacts us by either telephone or correspondence and agrees with all the issues
    • Send Letter 525 with a Form 4549/Form 4549-EZ, Do not use Letter 692.

    • State the "Correspondence Received Date" in the body of the Form 886-A while acknowledging taxpayer reply.

    • Update the case to Status 22.

    Taxpayer replies to CP 75 or CP 75A The taxpayer provides correspondence, but further verification of the issues is required
    • Explain to the taxpayer what additional information is needed.

    • State the "Correspondence Received Date" in the body of the Form 886-A while acknowledging taxpayer reply.

    • Send Letter 525 with a Form 4549/ Form 4549-EZ, Do not use Letter 692.

    • Update the case to Status 22.

    Taxpayer replies to Letter 566-B, Letter 566-B-EZ or Letter 525, or Letter 1862 Additional information is needed and the report is not revised
    • Attempt to reach the taxpayer by telephone is unsuccessful or

    • You reached the taxpayer by telephone and the information received is insufficient

    • Send Letter 692 with a copy of the original report, Form 4549/ Form 4549-EZ.

    • Explain to the taxpayer why the information he sent is not sufficient and what information is still needed.

    • Update case to Status 25.

    Note:

    If the taxpayer is reached by phone and agrees to send additional information, update the case to Status 25 and suspend for 30 days.

    Taxpayer replies to Letter 566-B, Letter 566-B-EZ or Letter 525, or Letter 1862 You successfully reach the taxpayer by telephone and
    • You discuss what items are still needed, and

    • The taxpayer implies the documentation will be sent

    • Update the case to Status 25.

    • Document the conversation with the taxpayer in the workpapers.

    Note:

    Do not send Letter 692 or a copy of the report.

    Taxpayer replies to the Letter 692 with inadequate documentation
    • Attempts to reach the taxpayer by telephone are unsuccessful or

    • You reached the taxpayer by telephone and the information received is insufficient

    • Send the case for a Statutory Notice of Deficiency (90 Day) letter. Be sure to include the following verbiage on the Form 886-A (which will be included with the Notice of Deficiency letter):
      "Thank you for your information dated xxxxxx. After a review of your documents, we are unable to change our prior determination." Explain the reason why you could not change the determination.

    Taxpayer replies to the Letter 692 The response allows the report to be adjusted Issue a new Letter 692 with a revised report.

    Note:

    If less than 45 days remain on the ASED, do not issue a new 692 letter. Issue a Statutory Notice of Deficiency (90 day) letter. On the Form 886-A, inform the taxpayer of the items adjusted and the reasons that you could not accept the return as filed.

    Taxpayer replies after 90 day letter Additional information is needed and attempts to reach the taxpayer by telephone are unsuccessful
    • Send Letter 555.

    • Tell taxpayer specifically why the report is unchanged (e.g., The school records you sent are not for the year in question, i.e., 2003).

    • Include this paragraph with Letter 555 and remind taxpayer of the following if you talk to him/her on the telephone:
      "Your time to petition the United States Tax Court will end on _______. (Insert or tell taxpayer last date to petition .) However you may continue to work with us to resolve your tax matter, but we cannot extend your time to petition the United States Tax Court beyond _________. (Insert or tell taxpayer last date to petition.)"

    Taxpayer replies after 90 day letter and 90 day period to petition has elapsed Additional information is needed and attempts to reach the taxpayer by telephone are unsuccessful
    • Send Letter 555.

    • Tell taxpayer specifically why the report is unchanged (e.g., The school records you sent are not for the year in question, i.e., 2003).

    • Include this paragraph with Letter 555 and remind taxpayer of the following if you talk to him/her on the telephone: "Your time to petition the United States Tax Court expired on ________________. (Insert or tell taxpayer last date to petition.)." However, if new information is submitted, we will re-evaluate our determination accordingly.

4.19.13.9.2  (01-01-2012)
Evaluating Taxpayer Responses

  1. Evaluate the taxpayer’s written correspondence and take the next action as soon as possible. If unable to do this in 30 days, initiate interim letter.

  2. Judgment must be used based on the facts and circumstances in each case to make a proper substantially correct determination. Workpapers must contain all determinations, facts and circumstances, pertaining to the case obtained either by telephone or written correspondence. Caution must be used when leaving messages on taxpayer answering machines or using cell phones. See IRM 11.3.2.6.1, Leaving Information on Answering Machines/Voice Mail, and IRM 11.3.2.6.2, Use of Cell Phones and Cordless Devices, for more detailed information.

  3. If the taxpayer’s telephone number is provided on ENMOD or in the correspondence received, and if the submitted documentation does not revise the exam report, then, if appropriate, call the taxpayer to request additional information instead of sending a request for additional information letter. However, if the attempt to reach the taxpayer by telephone is unsuccessful, send the request for additional information letter.

  4. All telephone contacts must be recorded in the case workpapers when the case is currently assigned on CEAS to the examiner receiving or making the call. If the case is not assigned to the phone assistor, they will record the call in CEAS notes. This allows all employees access to the case information if the taxpayer writes or calls back. See IRM 4.19.19.3.3, CEAS Notes.

  5. Telephone contacts should be made at appropriate times. If a case is being worked before 8:00 a.m. or after 9:00 p.m., local time at the taxpayer’s location, the case should be left for a day time telephone call.

    Note:

    Update ENMOD to reflect the changes in the taxpayer's phone number.

  6. See IRM 4.19.13.23, Taxpayer Advocate Service (TAS) Procedures, for additional information.

  7. If a Form 911, Request for Taxpayer Advocate Service Assistance (And Application for Taxpayer Assistance order), is received from the taxpayer, expedite the form to the TAS Office in the Campus.

4.19.13.9.3  (01-01-2011)
Fax Signatures

  1. The Tax Administration Council (TAC) approved the expanded use of faxes for receiving information and documents from taxpayers and practitioners. The changes are aimed at reducing taxpayer/practitioner burden as well as reducing the time it takes to resolve taxpayer cases and inquiries. The receipt of faxes should not require any significant changes to how the IRS handles open cases with taxpayers. It was intended as another means to receive case information.

  2. These general guidelines are applicable to all divisions and cover operations related to income tax, employment tax, excise tax, estate tax, gift tax, and generation skipping tax, as well as tax exempt and employee plans determinations.

  3. Filing of original tax returns via fax will be allowed only as part of a return perfection process (e.g., securing missing schedule or missing signature) initiated by the IRS or in the post-filing/non-filing activities.

  4. This allowance applies to inquiries and interactions conducted by Field Assistance, Accounts Management, Compliance Services, Field Examination, Field Collection, Determinations Units, Appeals, and the Taxpayer Advocate Service. Documentation, forms, letters, and returns can be received via fax in these circumstances even if a taxpayer signature is required since Chief Counsel has advised that in circumstances where contact with the taxpayer has been made and documented, faxed signatures are legally sufficient.

  5. The IRS will not acknowledge faxes received from taxpayers in the course of tax administration activities by a return fax. Exceptions can be made in unusual circumstances as determined by IRS management.

  6. Submission of documentation, forms, letters, and returns related to post filing/ non-filing inquiries and interactions can be allowed via fax based on taxpayer or IRS request unless there is a specific prohibition. Examples of documents that can be provided by fax in routine operations include:

    • Power of Attorney and Declaration of Representative, Form 2848

    • Tax Information Authorization, Form 8821

    • Election by a Small Business Corporation, Form 2553

    • Appeals Conference Requests

    • Responses/documentation needed to resolve filing or post-filing questions or correspondence.

4.19.13.9.4  (01-01-2011)
Specific Guidance on Use of Faxes in Tax Administration Processes

  1. The following documents/forms/letters can be accepted by fax if contact has been made with the taxpayer by phone or in-person, if the taxpayer history file is documented with the date of the contact, and if notation is made that the taxpayer wishes to send the documentation/form/letter by fax:

    • Request for Innocent Spouse Relief, Form 8857

    • Taxpayer Statement Regarding Refund, Form 3911

    • Installment Agreement, Form 433-D

    • Letter to designate a payment

    • Letter to request non-assertion of penalty

    • Letter to provide reasonable cause statement

    • Supporting Statement to Correct Information, Form 941-X

    • Election by a Small Business Corporation, Form 2553

  2. Consents to assess additional tax, Form 4549, Income Tax Examination Changes, Form 870, Waiver of Restrictions on Assessment and Collection of Deficiency in Tax and Acceptance of Overassessment, and others) of $25,000 or less can be accepted by fax if taxpayer contact has been made and the case history documents the date of contact and the desire of the taxpayer to submit the consent by fax. Consents to assess tax in excess of $25,000 should be secured with original signatures that are delivered in person or by mail.

  3. Taxpayer closing agreements involving tax amounts of $25,000 or less can be accepted by fax if taxpayer contact has been made and the case history documents the date of contact and the desire of the taxpayer to submit the consent by fax. Closing agreements for tax amounts in excess of $25,000 should be secured with original signatures that are delivered in person or by mail.

    Note:

    Faxed Agreements require an entry on Form 5344, Examination Closing Record, Page 2, Item 416.

  4. Employee Plan and Exempt Organization determination letter applications will not be accepted via fax.

  5. Determination Letter Requests related to income tax, gift tax, estate tax, generation-skipping transfer tax, employment tax and excise tax matters will not be accepted via fax.

  6. Consents to extend the limitations period for assessing tax will not be accepted via fax in normal operations.

4.19.13.9.5  (01-01-2012)
Correspondence or Return Received on Closed Examinations Not Meeting Audit Reconsideration Criteria

  1. Correspondence or returns received from taxpayers after the case is closed that does not meet audit reconsideration (see IRM 4.13.1.4, Criteria for Reconsideration, for replies that do meet audit reconsideration criteria) must be evaluated within 5 business days of receipt in the Operation. This correspondence consists of replies on:

    • Closed case mail/return, which is date stamped prior to the case being closed or the mail was received and stamped within seven calendar days of the Exam closing

    • Closed cases which show the assessment as full paid

    • A closed claim examination including responses to Letter 105-C/ Letter 106-C.

    Note:

    These procedures are for working correspondence. Processable claims will continue to be forwarded to Accounts Management for processing per IRM 21.5.3.4, General Claims Procedures.

  2. Since the taxpayer is still waiting for a response, the reply must be evaluated and a determination made within 14 calendar days.

  3. If the response cannot be worked within 14 calendar days, take the following actions:

    • Ensure that the response is acknowledged as soon as possible. (Every attempt must be made to resolve the taxpayer's issue within 30 days from the receipt of the correspondence.)

    • Control Base on IDRS using Category Code "90CL" .

    • Input a STAUP for six cycles to delay the notices.

4.19.13.9.5.1  (01-01-2012)
Replies Received by IRS Prior to Case Closure

  1. Use the following procedures for processing replies received by IRS prior to case closure or received and stamped within seven days of the Exam closing:

    Procedures for Replies Received Prior to Closing Case
    If Then
    Taxpayer submitted documents already considered
    1. Send Letter 4306 using Check Box 2 to inform taxpayer the information provided does not change the previous determination. File documents and copy of Letter 4306 with TC 300 DLN .

    2. Input CEAS non-action note indicating records were previously considered and the Letter 4306 was sent to the taxpayer.

    The reply is an agreement
    1. Forward signed report to be associated with TC 300 DLN.

    2. Input CEAS non-action note that agreement was received after case was closed.

    Taxpayer submits new documents that were not previously considered during the examination but do not change our determination
    1. Input TC 29X 00 and attach documents to be filed.

    2. Send Letter 4306 disallowing the additional information. Explain in open paragraph that new information received relating to the examination did not change our determination and their case is now closed.

    3. Input CEAS non-action note documenting actions, documents received and decision.

    Taxpayer submits new information that results in an abatement of the TC 300.
    1. Pull original return back from CEAS archive. Answer "No" to question, "Is this an Audit Recon?" so case will be set up in Status 7000. Notate workpapers of response, documents received and allowed issues.

    2. Send taxpayer No Change Letter 3581.

    3. Input TC 29X to abate the TC 300 assessment. Use appropriate IMF Reason Codes for issues adjusted.

    4. Update CEAS Status to 7020 and re-archive when closing case.

    Note:

    Recon Reason Codes should not be selected for closed mail processing.

    Taxpayer submits documents that partially change the determination of the previous assessment
    1. Pull original return back from CEAS archive. Answer "No" to question, "Is this an Audit Recon?" so case will be set up in Status 7000. Notate workpapers of response and allowed issues. Generate a report for the partial adjustment as "No Signature Necessary" . Forward to taxpayer using Letter 4306, Check Box 1.

    2. Input TC 290 showing change and documents to be filed.

    3. Update CEAS Status to 7021 and re-archive when closing case.

4.19.13.9.5.2  (01-01-2012)
Replies Received on Full Paid Examination Assessments

  1. Use the following procedures for processing replies received on full paid examination assessments:

    Procedures for Replies on Full-paid Exam Assessments
    If Then
    Taxpayer submitted documents already considered
    1. Send Letter 4306 using Check Box 2 to inform taxpayer the information provided does not change the previous determination. File documents and Letter 4306 with TC 300 DLN.

    2. Input CEAS non-action note indicating records were previously considered and the Letter 4306 was sent to the taxpayer.

    The reply is an agreement
    1. Forward signed report to be associated with TC 300 DLN.

    2. Input CEAS non-action note that agreement was received after case was closed.

    Taxpayer submits new documents that were not previously considered during the examination but do not change our determination
    1. Input TC 29Xfor zero and attach documents to be filed.

    2. Send Letter 105-C disallowing the additional information. Explain in open paragraph that new information received relating to the examination did not change our determination and the case is now closed.

    3. Input CEAS non-action note documenting actions, documents received and decision.

    Taxpayer submits new information that results in an abatement of the TC 300
    1. Pull original return back from CEAS archive. Answer "No" to question, "Is this an Audit Recon?" so case will be set up in Status 7000. Notate workpapers of response, documents received and allowed issues.

    2. Input TC 29X to abate the TC 300 assessment. Use appropriate IMF Reason Codes for issues adjusted. The TC 29X will generate a MF notice to the taxpayer with explanations based on the IMF Reason Codes selected.

    3. Update CEAS Status to 7024 and re-archive when closing case.

    Note:

    Recon Reason Codes should not be selected for closed mail processing.

    Taxpayer submits documents that partially change the determination of the previous assessment
    1. Pull original return back from CEAS archive. Answer "No" to question, "Is this an Audit Recon?" so case will be set up in Status 7000. Notate workpapers of response and allowed issues. Generate a report for the partial adjustment as "No Signature Necessary" . Forward to taxpayer using Letter 4306, Check Box 1. Update CEAS Status to 7025.

    2. Input TC 29X reflecting the change and associate documents.

    3. Obtain current research via CC SUMRY. Input Hold Code 2 if the module reflects a pending balance due.

    4. Send Letter 106-C.

4.19.13.9.5.3  (01-01-2012)
Replies Received on Closed Claims, including to Letter 105-C/Letter 106-C

  1. Replies received on closed claim examinations do not meet Audit Reconsideration criteria. These replies must also be evaluated using the following procedures:

    Procedures for Replies on Closed Claims
    If Then
    Taxpayer submits new documentation on a previously disallowed claim that changes our determination to allow the claim in full
    1. Pull original return back from CEAS archive. Answer "No" to question, "Is this an Audit Recon?" so case will be set up in Status 7000. Notate workpapers of response and allowed issues. Update CEAS Status 7031.

    2. Input TC 29X for claim amount.

    3. Input IMF Reason Codes for the allowed claim issue(s). The TC 29X will generate a MF notice with explanations based on the IMF Reason Codes selected.

    Taxpayer submits new documentation on a previously disallowed claim that supports a partial allowance of the claim
    1. Pull original return back from CEAS archive. Answer "No" to question, "Is this an Audit Recon?" so case will be set up in Status 7000. Notate workpapers of response and allowed issues. Generate a report for the partial adjustment as "No Signature Necessary" . Forward to taxpayer using Letter 4306 Check Box 1.

    2. Input TC 29X showing change and documents to be filed.

    3. Update CEAS Status to 7025 and re-archive when closing case.

    Taxpayer submits documentation that doesn’t change the determination after a Letter 105-C/ Letter 106-C has been issued
    1. Send Letter 4306 using Check Box 3.

    2. Input non-action note documenting the actions, documents received and decision.

4.19.13.9.5.4  (01-01-2012)
Additional Information

  1. CEAS Status Code definitions used for the above procedures are as follow:

    CEAS Status Code Definitions
    Status Code Definition
    Status 7000 Pulled back from Archive
    Status 7020 Closed case mail processed with a full TC 300 Abatement
    Status 7021 Closed case mail processed with partial TC 300 Abatement
    Status 7024 Closed with a full TC 300 Abatement
    Status 7025 Closed with a partial TC 300 Abatement
    Status 7031 Closed claims (including response to 105-C / 106-C letters).

  2. For W&I Campuses, charge time for EITC to 710/720 – 93600, and for Discretionary to 710/720 – 93400. For SBSE Campuses, charge time for EITC to 91695, for Discretionary to 91385, and for Substitute For Return to 91955.

  3. Use WP&C to drop volumes for receipts and closures per OFP Code.

4.19.13.9.6  (04-29-2011)
Taxpayer Requests Additional Time to Respond

  1. If a taxpayer requests additional time to submit requested documentation, the time will be automatically granted up to 30 days on the first request. If subsequent time extensions are requested judgment should be used based on the facts and circumstances for the individual case.

    Note:

    Cases where the Statutory Notice of Deficiency has been issued, the taxpayer must be informed that the extension is to submit additional documentation and will not extend the time to petition Tax Court.

  2. If the request is made via a telephone call, an Action Note will be created on CEAS explaining what the taxpayer is requesting.

  3. The case workpaper must be updated to reflect that the requested extension is being granted and for how long. The Aging Reason Code (Item Number 410) on the Form 5344, Examination Closing Record, must be updated to 08 and be saved. This Code will be used for tracking purposes.

  4. The appropriate extension will be added to the end of the suspense period regardless of how much time remains on the original suspense period.

  5. If the suspense period has expired and the case is being processed by the ACE (Automated Correspondence Exam) System, it must be backed down if possible.

  6. If the suspense period has expired and the case was not processed through ACE, the extension period will begin with the date of the contact to the taxpayer (either by phone or in writing).

  7. If it is not possible to back the case down (i.e., next letter has already been triggered to CPS)the taxpayer must be contacted to inform them that the extension cannot be granted and why. Every effort should be made to accommodate the taxpayer request.

  8. Encourage the taxpayer to fax the documentation, if possible.


More Internal Revenue Manual