An Action on Decision (AOD) is a formal memorandum prepared by the IRS Office of Chief Counsel that announces the future litigation position the IRS will take with regard to the court decision addressed by the AOD.

The following list initially presents these documents in reverse chronological order, from the present back to calendar year 1997.

View information about Using IRS Forms, Instructions, Publications and Other Item Files.

  1. Enter a term in the Find box.
  2. Click the Search button.
寻求帮助
编号 裁决 问题 发布日期
1997-07 The Edna Louise Dunn Trust v. Commissioner. Reflects the Service's agreement that a corporation's distribution of stock to shareholders in a spinoff of a subsidiary was tax-free under I.R.C. § 355(a)(1). 03/03/2000
2000-01 McLeod v. United States, 276 F.Supp. 213 (S.D. Ala. 1967). Reflects the Service's acquiescence in the court's conclusion holding that the Department of Pensions and Security “constructively placed” the children in the taxpayer's home for adoption by presenting its favorable report to the court. Therefore, the requirements of section 152(b)(2) and Treas. Reg. § 1.152-(2)(c) were satisfied and taxpayer was entitled to the exemptions. In the Action on Decision in McLeod distributed on January 11, 1968, 1968 AOD LEXIS 75, the 03/03/2000
1998-07 Clark D. & Janis L. Pulliam v. Comm., T.C. Memo. 1997-274. This Action on Decision reflects the Service's disagreement with the Tax Court's opinion, on the facts presented, that protecting against competition and retaining a key employee are valid corporate business purposes sufficiently compelling to overcome the evidence that a distribution of stock was used as a device for distributing earnings and profits. 03/03/2000
1999-07 Vulcan Materials Commpany and Subsidiaries v. Comm. Reflects the findings of the Tax Court that the statutory language of section 902(a) and its regulations are unclear. The Court was not persuaded that the reference to "accumulated profits" necessarily meant all of the foreign corporation's accumulated profits for the year. The Court interpreted the language "on or with respect to the accumulated profits of such 03/03/2000
1997-06 Risman v. Commissioner, 100 T.C. 1991 (1993) (T.C. # 11429-91). AOD reflects the Service's continued disagreement with the factual finding that the taxpayer made a deposit, not a payment of tax, when the remitted a check with a request for extension of time for filing a return. 03/03/2000
1999-15 William & Helen Woodral v. Commissioner, 112 T.C.19 (1999). Reflects the Service's acquiescence in the Court's conclusion that it was unnecessary to look to the legislative history because the language of section 6404(g) clearly granted the Tax Court jurisdiction to review the Service's failure to abate interest under Section 6404, not just subsection 6404(e). The Court then concluded that the evidence failed to establish that the interest on the employment taxes was excessive in 03/03/2000
1998-01 Beatty v. Commissioner, 106 T.C. 268 (1996). Reflects the Service's agreement that a county sheriff was entitled to reduce his gross receipts by costs of goods sold in computing income from providing meals to prisoners. 03/03/2000
1998-06 Estate of Clara K. Hoover v. Comm., 69 F.3d 1044 (10th Cir. 1995). This Action on decision reflects the Service's agreement with the circuit court's ruling that, in the absence of regulations, an estate claiming a special use valuation under I.R.C. § 2032A for property used for farming purposes may also take into account a minority interest discount in valuing the property. 03/03/2000
1999-06 Estate of Mellinger v. Commissioner, 112 T.C. 4 (1999). Reflects the Service's acquiescence in the Court's conclusion that closely-held stock held in a QTIP trust should not be aggregated, for valuation pusposes, with stock in the same corporation held in a revocable trust and includible in the decedent's gross estate. The Tax Court's decision in this case is consistent with the Service’s position regarding the valuation of minority interests passing to QTIP trusts. The proper funding of the 03/03/2000
1997-11 Trans City Life Insurance Company v. Commissioner. Reflects the Service's disagreement with the Tax Court's conclusion that the Commissioner abused his discretion in determining that reinsurance agreements entered into by the taxpayer with an unrelated insurer had a significant tax avoidance effect. 03/03/2000
1997-03 Buckeye Countrymark v. Comm., 103 T.C. 547 (1994) Reflects the Service's agreement that nonexempt cooperatives subject to subchapter T of the Internal Revenue Code are permitted to carry back losses from furnishing goods and services to its members to earlier tax years under I.R.C. § 172. 03/03/2000
1999-11 James J. and Sandra A. Gales v. Comm, T.C. Memo. 1999-27 Reflects the Service's acquiescence in the Court's conclusion that the advance commissions were loans rather than income in the year received., specifically finding that on occasion repayment was demanded of taxpayer and that he personally repaid some of the advance commissions. The court relied upon Dennis v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1997-275, where advance commissions were found to be loans because the taxpayer was personally liable for repayment at the time 03/03/2000
1998-03 Golden Belt Telephone Coop v. Comm, 108 T.C. 498 (1997). Reflects the Service's agreement that, in determining the tax exempt status of a rural telephone cooperative, payments to the cooperative by long distance providers for billing and collection services are excluded in determining the percentage of payments received by the cooperative for communication services provided to its members. 03/03/2000
1997-09 Royal Caribbean Cruises, Ltd. v. Commissioner, 108 F.3d 290. Reflects the Service's acceptance of the Eleventh Circuit's holding that the I.R.C. § 4471 excise tax on voyages on commercial passenger vessels does not apply to voyages on which passengers embark or disembark at intermediate stops within the United States if the voyage both begins and ends outside the United States. 03/03/2000
1997-02 United States v. Kao, 81 F.3d 114 (9th Cir. 1996). Reflects the Service's acquiescence in the result that the Service could not, by issuing summonses, compel taxpayers to sign consent directives authorizing the release of records from unidentified domestic and foreign banks. 03/03/2000
1998-04 Fredericks v. Commissioner, No. 96-7748. Reflects the Service's agreement with the circuit court's ruling that, based upon the particular facts of this case, the Service was equitably estopped from relying upon a Form 872-A to indefinitely extend the period of imitations for making an assessment when the Service's actions misled the taxpayer into believing that the form was not in effect. 03/03/2000
1997-10 Sun Microsystems, Inc. v. Commissioner, T.C.M. 1995-69. Reflects the Service's agreement that the income recognized by the taxpayer's employees under I.R.C. § 421(b) on the "disqualifying disposition" of incentive stock options were includable as "wages" incurred as a research expense in calculating the taxpayer's credit for increasing research expenses under I.R.C. § 41. 03/03/2000
1999-01 Eisenberg v. Comm., 155 F. 3d 50 (2d Cir. 1998). This Action on Decision reflects the Service's acquiescence in the Court's conclusion, to the extent, that it held that there is no legal prohibition against the discount in the value of a gift of closely held stock by an amount attributed to the potential capital gains tax liability of the corporation upon liquidation, or upon the sale or distribution of its assets. The applicability of such a discount, as well as its amount, will hereafter be treated as factual matters to be determined by competent expert testimony. 03/03/2000
1997-05 Hurt v. USA, 70 F.3d 1261 (4th Cir. 1995). Reflects the Service's disagreement with the Fourth Circuit's opinion that the Service was not entitled to collect statutory interest on the taxes assessed pursuant to a Tax Court decision based upon a settlement agreement. 03/03/2000
1997-01 Xerox Corporation v. United States, 41 F.3d 647 (Fed. Cir. 1994). Reflects the Service's disagreement that the U.S.-U.K. Income Tax Treaty allows a United States corporation to treat advance tax paid by a U.K. subsidiary as a creditable tax under I.R.C. § 902(a). 03/03/2000
1999-17 Duke Energy Natural Gas Corporation v. Comm. Reflects the Service's nonacquiescence in the court's conclusion holding that natural gas gathering systems are property includible in asset class 13.2 and must be depreciated over a 7-year period. 03/03/2000
1999-10 Boyd Gaming Corporation v. Comm., 9th Cir. 1999. Reflects the Service's acquiescence in the Court's conclusion that held that the taxpayer's particular security and other business-related concerns provided sufficient justification for its policy of requiring employees to stay on the employer's business premise to satisfy "the convenience of the employer" test of section 119. In applying section 119 and Treas. Reg. § 1.119-1, the Service 03/03/2000
1999-02 Larotonda v. Commissioner, AOD CC-1998-010. An action on decision stating that the Service will not acquiescence to the Court's conclusion in Larotonda. Recent legislation warrants the withdrawing of this AOD. The statutory provision effectively at issue in Larotonda was modified by the Restructuring and Reform Act of 1998, Pub. L. No. 105-206, 112 Stat. 685 (1998), enacted on July 22, 1998. Section 3436 of the Act amends section 72(t) to provided that the early distribution tax shall not apply to a distribution made on account of a levy 03/03/2000
1997-12 Jackson v. Comm, 108 T.C. 130 (1997) ( T.C. # 23558-94). Reflects the Service's agreement that a former insurance agent is not required to pay tax under the Self-Employment Contributions Act (SECA) on specified contractual termination payments he received from an insurance company upon the termination of his contract with the insurance company. 03/03/2000
1998-05 McCormick v. Peterson, CV93-2157 (E.D>N.Y. 1993). Reflects the Service's agreement with the district court's ruling that adding the words "under protest" to the signature of a tax return without otherwise modifying the words of the jurat does not cast doubt on the validity of the jurat and, accordingly, does not invalidate the document as a return. 03/03/2000

Get Adobe Acrobat Reader