An Action on Decision (AOD) is a formal memorandum prepared by the IRS Office of Chief Counsel that announces the future litigation position the IRS will take with regard to the court decision addressed by the AOD.

The following list initially presents these documents in reverse chronological order, from the present back to calendar year 1997.

View information about Using IRS Forms, Instructions, Publications and Other Item Files.

  1. Enter a term in the Find box.
  2. Click the Search button.
Buscar ayuda
Número Decisión Problema Fecha de publicación
1998-05 McCormick v. Peterson, CV93-2157 (E.D>N.Y. 1993). Reflects the Service's agreement with the district court's ruling that adding the words "under protest" to the signature of a tax return without otherwise modifying the words of the jurat does not cast doubt on the validity of the jurat and, accordingly, does not invalidate the document as a return. 03/03/2000
1997-05 Hurt v. USA, 70 F.3d 1261 (4th Cir. 1995). Reflects the Service's disagreement with the Fourth Circuit's opinion that the Service was not entitled to collect statutory interest on the taxes assessed pursuant to a Tax Court decision based upon a settlement agreement. 03/03/2000
1999-07 Vulcan Materials Commpany and Subsidiaries v. Comm. Reflects the findings of the Tax Court that the statutory language of section 902(a) and its regulations are unclear. The Court was not persuaded that the reference to "accumulated profits" necessarily meant all of the foreign corporation's accumulated profits for the year. The Court interpreted the language "on or with respect to the accumulated profits of such 03/03/2000
1997-09 Royal Caribbean Cruises, Ltd. v. Commissioner, 108 F.3d 290. Reflects the Service's acceptance of the Eleventh Circuit's holding that the I.R.C. § 4471 excise tax on voyages on commercial passenger vessels does not apply to voyages on which passengers embark or disembark at intermediate stops within the United States if the voyage both begins and ends outside the United States. 03/03/2000
2001-06 Therese Hahn v. Commissioner, 110 T. C. No. 140 (1998) Reflects the Service's acquiescence in the court's conclusion that the 1981 amendment did not expressly repeal the effective date of section 2040(b)(1), since there is no language in the 1981 amendment that specifically repeals the effective date of subsection (b)(1). The Court also held that the 1981 amendment did not impliedly repeal the effective date of section 2040(b)(1), because section 2040(b)(1) enacted in 1976 and the 1981 amendment to 10/18/2001
1999-11 James J. and Sandra A. Gales v. Comm, T.C. Memo. 1999-27 Reflects the Service's acquiescence in the Court's conclusion that the advance commissions were loans rather than income in the year received., specifically finding that on occasion repayment was demanded of taxpayer and that he personally repaid some of the advance commissions. The court relied upon Dennis v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1997-275, where advance commissions were found to be loans because the taxpayer was personally liable for repayment at the time 03/03/2000
1999-04 Oshkosh Truck Corporation v. United States 123 F.3d 1477. Reflects the Service's acquiescence that a presumed markup percentage must be used in computing the vehicular excise tax on automotive articles sold to the United States directly by manufacturers when there are no retail sales outlets for such automotive articles. 03/03/2000
1998-03 Golden Belt Telephone Coop v. Comm, 108 T.C. 498 (1997). Reflects the Service's agreement that, in determining the tax exempt status of a rural telephone cooperative, payments to the cooperative by long distance providers for billing and collection services are excluded in determining the percentage of payments received by the cooperative for communication services provided to its members. 03/03/2000
1999-14 Mutual Assurance, Inc. v. United States, 56 F.3d 1353. Reflects the Service's nonacquiescence in the court's conclusion that held that a timely filed claim for refund that was allowed in full may be amended after the expiration of the statute of limitations for filing a claim for refund. The court relied on Bemis Brothers Bag Co. v. United States, 289 U.S. 28 (1933) which dealt with whether the original claim and the amended claim perfected after the limitations period had sufficient similarity for the amendment to 03/03/2000
2000-03 Simpson v. United States, 183 F.3d 812 (8th Cir. 1999). Reflects the Service's nonacquiescence in the Court's conclusion, that under the plain language of TRA 86 section 1433(b)(2)(A), the statutory protection applies to transfers under trusts that were irrevocable on September 25, 1985, because Congress intended to protect trust creators who relied on the law as it existed at the time the trust became irrevocable. The district court in Simpson v. United States, 17 03/04/2000
1999-05 St. Jude Medical, Inc. v Comm, 34 F. 3d 1394 (8th Cir. 1994). Reflects the conclusion by the Eighth Circuit that for purposes of calculating the CTI of a DISC, mandating the use of SIC categories to allocate R&D expenses is inconsistent with Congress's intent in enacting the DISC statute to allow costs to be allocated on a product-by-product basis or on the basis of product lines. The Court also stated that the mandated use of Section 1.861-8 by 03/03/2000
2001-04 Exxon v. Commissioner, 113 T. C. No. 338 (1999). Reflects the Service's acquiescence in result only in the court's conclusion, with respect to the net income issue, that the PRT allowances effectively compensated for the nondeductibility of interest expense and that the PRT, in its predominant character, constituted a tax in the nature of an income or excess profits tax in the U.S. sense. In reaching this holding, the Court relied on “representative industry data” presented at trial by Exxon. The Court 08/17/2001
1998-02 Bilzerian v. United States, 86 F.3d 1067 (11th Cir. 1996) Reflects the Service's acquiescence in the result reached by the Eleventh Circuit in holding that once an assessed tax liability is paid by the taxpayer, the Service cannot use administrative collection actions to collect that liability even if the Service had erroneously refunded all or part of the liability after its payment. 03/03/2000
1999-10 Boyd Gaming Corporation v. Comm., 9th Cir. 1999. Reflects the Service's acquiescence in the Court's conclusion that held that the taxpayer's particular security and other business-related concerns provided sufficient justification for its policy of requiring employees to stay on the employer's business premise to satisfy "the convenience of the employer" test of section 119. In applying section 119 and Treas. Reg. § 1.119-1, the Service 03/03/2000
1999-15 William & Helen Woodral v. Commissioner, 112 T.C.19 (1999). Reflects the Service's acquiescence in the Court's conclusion that it was unnecessary to look to the legislative history because the language of section 6404(g) clearly granted the Tax Court jurisdiction to review the Service's failure to abate interest under Section 6404, not just subsection 6404(e). The Court then concluded that the evidence failed to establish that the interest on the employment taxes was excessive in 03/03/2000
2000-09 Weisbart v. United States Dept of Treas. & IRS. Reflects the Service's acquiescence with the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit's decision that section 7502 treats the claim as filed on the date of mailing (August 17, 1995) because the taxpayer mailed the claim on the last day of the period prescribed for filing the claim with respect to the withheld taxes. Pointing to Treas. Reg. §§ 301.6402-3(a)(5) and 301.7502-1, the Second 11/17/2000
1997-07 The Edna Louise Dunn Trust v. Commissioner. Reflects the Service's agreement that a corporation's distribution of stock to shareholders in a spinoff of a subsidiary was tax-free under I.R.C. § 355(a)(1). 03/03/2000
1997-03 Buckeye Countrymark v. Comm., 103 T.C. 547 (1994) Reflects the Service's agreement that nonexempt cooperatives subject to subchapter T of the Internal Revenue Code are permitted to carry back losses from furnishing goods and services to its members to earlier tax years under I.R.C. § 172. 03/03/2000
1997-10 Sun Microsystems, Inc. v. Commissioner, T.C.M. 1995-69. Reflects the Service's agreement that the income recognized by the taxpayer's employees under I.R.C. § 421(b) on the "disqualifying disposition" of incentive stock options were includable as "wages" incurred as a research expense in calculating the taxpayer's credit for increasing research expenses under I.R.C. § 41. 03/03/2000
1997-11 Trans City Life Insurance Company v. Commissioner. Reflects the Service's disagreement with the Tax Court's conclusion that the Commissioner abused his discretion in determining that reinsurance agreements entered into by the taxpayer with an unrelated insurer had a significant tax avoidance effect. 03/03/2000
2001-02 Arnold W. Vinick v. USA, 205 F.3d 1 (1st Cir. 2000). Reflects the Service's nonacquiescence in the First Circuit's reversal of the lower court's decision that Vinick was liable as a responsible person under section 6672 for the unpaid withholding taxes of Jefferson Bronze Company. The First Circuit held that the lower courts' findings of fact were 'based on a misunderstanding of the legal standard for what constitutes a responsible person.' The court further stated that [a]bsent a 02/27/2001
1999-06 Estate of Mellinger v. Commissioner, 112 T.C. 4 (1999). Reflects the Service's acquiescence in the Court's conclusion that closely-held stock held in a QTIP trust should not be aggregated, for valuation pusposes, with stock in the same corporation held in a revocable trust and includible in the decedent's gross estate. The Tax Court's decision in this case is consistent with the Service’s position regarding the valuation of minority interests passing to QTIP trusts. The proper funding of the 03/03/2000
1999-13 Dubin v. Commissioner, 99 T.C. 325 (1992) . Reflects the Service's acquiescence in the court's conclusion that held although section 6231(a)(12) expressly provides that a husband and wife who have a joint interest in a partnership shall be treated as one person, the regulations reverse that rule, stating that a husband and wife holding a joint interest should be treated as separate partners. Temp. Treas. Reg. § 301.6231(a)(12)-1T(a). The Court determined that the bankruptcy of the husband caused the partnership items on the 03/03/2000
1999-16 Conway v. Commissioner, 111 T.C. 350 (1998) Reflects the Service's acquiescence in the Court's conclusion that held that the transaction was a nontaxable exchange pursuant to section 1035. Consequently, the 10-percent penalty under section 72(q), which generally applies to taxable distributions from an annuity, was not applicable to the transaction. Section 1035(a)(3) provides that no gain or loss shall be recognized on the exchange of an annuity contract for another annuity contract. See also Treas 03/03/2000
2000-01 McLeod v. United States, 276 F.Supp. 213 (S.D. Ala. 1967). Reflects the Service's acquiescence in the court's conclusion holding that the Department of Pensions and Security “constructively placed” the children in the taxpayer's home for adoption by presenting its favorable report to the court. Therefore, the requirements of section 152(b)(2) and Treas. Reg. § 1.152-(2)(c) were satisfied and taxpayer was entitled to the exemptions. In the Action on Decision in McLeod distributed on January 11, 1968, 1968 AOD LEXIS 75, the 03/03/2000

Official Adobe Website