This IRM explains appeals and alternative dispute resolution techniques specific to the Estate and Gift Tax program.

Estate and gift tax examiners and managers assigned to examine and oversee the examination of estate and gift tax returns and issues are responsible for complying with servicewide policies and authorities set forth in IRM 1.2.1.5, Servicewide Policies and Authorities, Policy Statements for the Examining Process.

Examination of estate and gift tax returns should be conducted in a manner that will promote public confidence as stated in the Mission of the Service. See IRM 1.2.1.2.1, Policy Statement 1-1.

Policy Statement 4-52 established a general guideline that examination and processing of returns should be completed within 18 months of the filing date. See IRM 1.2.1.5.18, Policy Statement 4-52, Establishment of 18-month Examination Cycle.

Estate and gift examiners and managers assigned to examine and oversee the examination of international estate and gift tax returns and issues are responsible for complying with all applicable servicewide examination delegation orders and SB/SE delegation orders. A table summarizing estate and gift delegation orders is available at IRM 4.25.14.10, Estate and Gift Tax, Miscellaneous Procedures, Signature Authority.

Section 3504 of RRA 98, Public Law 105-206 requires the Service to include an explanation of the examination and collection process, as well as information about assistance from the Taxpayer Advocate with any first report/notice of proposed deficiency. Pub 3498, The Examination Process, must be used for this purpose.

Statement of Procedural Rules 601.506 requires that examiners must forward any correspondence (or copy), discussions, reports and/or other material to the taxpayer at the same time it is sent to the representative.

The Form 706 return instructions and CFR 20.6018-4, CFR 25.6019-3, and CFR 25.6019–4 list required filing documents.

Rev. Proc. 2017-25 formally established the Fast Track Settlement program.

The following table sets forth commonly used terms and acronyms:

The National Quality Review System (NQRS) is a web-based review system used by Estate and Gift Tax Policy, Estate and Gift Tax Examination Management, and Estate and Gift Tax Quality Measures and Analysis (QMA) to generate and review reports analyzing national quality performance based upon standardized quality attributes set forth in Document 12499, Estate and Gift Tax Examination Embedded Quality Job Aid. NQRS report data is compiled by QMA on a quarterly basis, but ad hoc reports may be obtained monthly. The use of NQRS is explained in additional detail in IRM 4.25.1.8, Manager Embedded Quality Review and Specialty Exam National Embedded Quality Review Programs.

Operational Reviews and related NQRS reports are conducted by Territory Managers and the Chief of Estate and Gift to measure national adherence to quality standards and managerial performance and/or oversight.

Customer (i.e. taxpayer) satisfaction reports are generated by SB/SE Operation Support Research on a quarterly basis. These reports provide masked taxpayer narratives that are responsive to a pre-defined set of survey questions. The quarterly survey reports are to be used to identify areas for examination quality improvement.

Frequent Front-line manager reviews are conducted under the Examination Quality Review System (EQRS), with the frequency based on annual personnel requirements.

The Estate and Gift Tax program is required to follow all servicewide examination procedures and those set forth in SB/SE examining process IRM. The following resources provide additional information relating to the processing, classification, examination and appeal of Estate and Gift Tax program returns and claims:

Additional resources to assist in the protection against prohibited ex parte communication are found in:

Additional FTS program information can be found in IRM 8.26.2, Fast Track Settlement for Small Business/Self Employed (SB/SE) Taxpayers.

Additional RAP program information can be found in:

The Taxpayer Bill of Rights (TBOR) lists rights that already existed in the tax code, putting them in simple language and grouping them into 10 fundamental rights. Employees are responsible for being familiar with and acting in accord with taxpayer rights. See IRC 7803(a)(3), Execution of Duties in Accord with Taxpayer Rights. For additional information about the TBOR, see Taxpayer Bill of Rights.

Rev. Proc. 2012-18, Ex Parte Communications Between Appeals and Other Internal Revenue Service Employees, and IRM 8.1.10, Appeals Function, Ex Parte Communications, provide guidance regarding the prohibition of ex parte communications between Appeals Officers and other Internal Revenue Service employees, to the extent that those communications appear to compromise the independence of the Appeals Officers. An ex parte communication is a communication that takes place between any Appeals employee (e.g., Appeals Officers, Settlement Officers, Appeals Case Team Leaders, Appeals Tax Computation Specialists) and employees of other IRS functions, without the taxpayer or the taxpayer’s representative being given an opportunity to participate in the communication. Ex parte communications may include oral and written forms of communication. Written communications include those that are manually or electronically generated. If a communication is a prohibited ex parte communication, the taxpayer or the taxpayer’s representative must be given an opportunity to participate in that communication.

Not all communications are within the scope of the term ex parte communication. To determine whether a communication is an ex parte communication, see the guidelines as set forth in the IRM 8.1.10.

The prohibition on ex parte communications applies to preconference meetings between Appeals and Examination (Estate and Gift). A preconference meeting could appear to compromise the independence of Appeals. See Rev. Proc. 2012-18. Accordingly, Appeals will hold a preconference meeting only after giving the taxpayer or the taxpayer’s representative an opportunity to participate.

Preconference meetings may be held between Appeals Officers and Estate and Gift examiners on protested cases containing unusual or complex issues. A determination regarding what is an unusual and complex issue will be left to the discretion of the Estate and Gift examiner and Appeals Officer.

The purpose of a preconference is to discuss the issues, protest, and Estate and Gift’s written rebuttal to the protest in cases containing complex or unusual issues. A frank discussion of the issues will help to identify additional information that may be needed on the issues. The need for any resources, specialists, or expert witnesses, etc., can be discussed at this meeting. Estate and Gift is encouraged to share its views on the disputed issues, including its assessment of the facts and the law leading to recommended adjustments on particular issues. The conference is not to be used as a vehicle for securing a commitment from Appeals to defend any particular issues, commit to particular settlement positions, or otherwise "negotiate" the settlement posture of Appeals on the case.

Preconference meetings will take place prior to the Appeals/Taxpayer conferences.

If a preconference is requested by Estate and Gift, the request should accompany the file when it is sent to Appeals. The request will be made in writing in a separate memorandum (to be contained in the case file) and signed by the Estate and Gift group manager.

Review of Taxpayer Protest and Preparation of the Rebuttal in Non-docketed Cases:

If a preconference initiated by either party is accepted (by the other party), the acceptance need not be in writing, but acceptance should be communicated expeditiously to the other party.

A request by either party will address the unusual or complex factual or legal issues that warrant the preconference.

Either party can decline the other’s request for a preconference by submitting a response (including an e-mail) to that effect signed by the AO or Estate and Gift examiner and submitted to the other party with copies to the respective managers.

Despite these preconference procedures, the AO remains responsible for complying with the statute procedures outlined in IRM 8.21, Appeals Statute Responsibilities.

Participation in a Preconference:

Unless specifically excluded from Appeals consideration, all cases are eligible for an Appeals conference if the taxpayer submits an adequate formal written protest (when required), or small case request as directed in Pub 5, Your Appeal Rights and How to Prepare a Protest if You Disagree. IRM 4.25.10.7, Estate and Gift Tax, Case Closing Procedures, Unagreed Adjustment Tax Period, and IRM 4.25.10.8, Partially Agreed, Partially Unagreed Case, provide detailed guidance for estate and gift examiners on issuing a 30-day letter, responding to a taxpayer’s protest and closing an unagreed case:

Before FTS is offered as an option to the taxpayer, the examiner must establish eligibility. The examiner should discuss potential issue(s) and any questions about the application with their group manager prior to offering FTS to the taxpayer.

SB/SE FTS is generally available for all non-docketed SB/SE cases with no regard to dollar amount. There are cases that are excluded from FTS.

Examples of cases that do not qualify for SB/SE FTS include the following:

If the examiner and his or her group manager determine that a taxpayer’s request for SB/SE Fast Track Settlement is ineligible because it is excluded from FTS the reasons for ineligibility should be explained to the taxpayer in writing.

If one issue in a case is determined to be ineligible for SB/SE FTS, all issues in the case are deemed ineligible.

Any request by the taxpayer for FTS that is denied by the SB/SE group manager, other than defined excluded cases, requires review and concurrence by the SB/SE Territory Manager. A decision by the SB/SE Territory Manager not to accept a case into FTS is final and the taxpayer will be notified of any such denial by SB/SE.

All unagreed case issues must be fully developed prior to being accepted into the FTS program. A case is considered fully developed when:

Examiners should provide Pub. 5022, Fast Track Settlement, A Process For Prompt Resolution of SB/SE Tax Issues, upon determining the case is eligible for FTS and there are unagreed issues.

The examiner and group manager may contact the Appeals Team Manager for assistance in determining eligibility.

To request a FTS, submit a FTS package to the Appeals Team Manager. The FTS package requirements are at IRM 8.26.2.4.

Forward the FTS Package to the local Appeals Office within three business days of obtaining the signed FTS application.

Cases using FTS remain in SB/SE jurisdiction. Do not transfer the full case file to Appeals.

Refer to the procedures in IRM 8.26.2.5, Eligibility.

Once the case is approved and assigned to Appeals for FTS, the examiner should update the case to status code 15, and apply aging reason code 23. Upon completion of the FTS session, the examiner should return the case to status code 12.

See the SBSE Fast Track Settlement Job Aids for additional information.

The FTS session is led by Appeals. Appeals does not act in a traditional Appeals role, but uses an interest-based approach to facilitate a settlement of the issues between the parties. Using mediation techniques, Appeals attempts to bring the parties to a mutual resolution of the issues during the FTS session.

Estate and Gift participates in the FTS process along with the taxpayer and Appeals. The FTS Appeals Official may propose settlement terms for any or all issues. The settlement proposal must be mutually agreed upon by both the taxpayer and Estate and Gift. Neither party is obligated to accept the settlement proposal offered by Appeals.

Form 14000, Fast Track Session Report, is an administrative document that assists Appeals in the planning and administration of the fast track settlement session. Form 14000 provides a summary of all disputed issues, amounts in dispute, relevant conference dates, and the final disposition. The Fast Track session report is signed by the parties

The examiner should bring the case file, workpapers, computer, and printer to the FTS session.

If no resolution is reached between SB/SE and the taxpayer, the FTS Official may use his/her settlement authority to propose a settlement based on an assessment of the hazards of litigation. If the FTS Official makes a settlement proposal that is accepted by SB/SE and the taxpayer, SB/SE closes the case agreed on the basis of the Appeals settlement. The FTS Official will prepare and execute the appropriate forms and closing agreement, if applicable. The FTS Official must prepare an Appeals Case Memorandum (ACM).

The Appeals Official forwards the "SB/SE FTS Closing Package" to the Estate and Gift Group using Form 3210. See IRM 8.26.2.15.2 for a complete listing of the documents contained in the FTS SB/SE Closing Package. Estate and Gift secures appropriate closing documents from the taxpayer and closes the case using traditional procedures.

If the taxpayer and/or SB/SE presents new information related to the issues in dispute, the Appeals Official will consider postponing or terminating the session until both parties have had adequate time to review and evaluate it.

If the parties are unable to resolve an issue, the taxpayer will retain all of the traditional appeal rights and Estate and Gift will close the case as "Unagreed" . When Appeals receives an unagreed case after an FTS session, Appeals assigns it to a different Appeals Officer.

If a resolution is not reached using FTS and the taxpayer requests appeals consideration, Post Appeals Mediation is not available for any issue considered during the FTS process if the parties fail to resolve the issue or if either party withdraws after the start of the process. See Rev. Proc. 2014-63, 2014-53, I.R.B. 1014 and Rev. Proc. 2017-25, 2017-14 I.R.B. 1039.

A request for participation in the SB/SE FTS process may be withdrawn or terminated.

A party wishing to withdraw or terminate should provide written notice to the FTS Appeals Official and the other party as described in IRM 8.26.2.9.3, Withdrawal.

After assignment of the case, if all parties agree to the RAP process, the ATCL/AO contacts the taxpayer and the Exam Team Manager to start the RAP planning process and sends Letter 5248, Introduction to Rapid Appeals Process. As part of the initial planning process the ATCL/AO will contact both the taxpayer and Exam to explain the process and benefit, outline the plan and establish a mutually agreeable conference date.

The Exam group manager, in consultation with the assigned ATCL/AO determines the Exam participants. Exam participants may include the group manager, lead attorney, estate tax attorney, paralegals and legal assistants, and others who have the knowledge and expertise to contribute to issue resolution. Exam participants may also include Technical Specialists (e.g., engineering, business valuation experts, outside fee appraisers, etc.). In those instances where the issues are industry specific or there is a Technical Specialist position established for the issue, the participation of appropriate Technical Specialists is strongly recommended.

The RAP session is led by Appeals, but all three parties are active participants during the RAP process.

After an initial joint session, Appeals may conduct the entire RAP session jointly, or meet with the parties separately (subject to the provision of a satisfactory ex-parte waiver).

RAP is elective. If at any point the ATCL/AO determines that the RAP process is not facilitating the resolution of the unagreed issue, the RAP process is terminated, and the ATCL/AO continues consideration of the issue(s) using the traditional Appeals process. The taxpayer and Exam can also withdraw from the process at any time.

If settlement is reached in the RAP session:

Because the case is in Appeals' jurisdiction, normal Appeals closing procedures apply, including those pertaining to Joint Committee Review. For cases assigned to ATCL Operations, see IRM 8.7.11, Working Appeals Team Cases.

If the case is not resolved using RAP, the taxpayer is entitled to traditional Appeals consideration on all remaining unagreed issues. The ATCL/AO who facilitated RAP will also consider the traditional appeal of the unagreed issues.