- Highlights of This Issue
- Preface
- Part I. Rulings and Decisions Under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986
- Part III. Administrative, Procedural, and Miscellaneous
- Part IV. Items of General Interest
- Definition of Terms and Abbreviations
- Numerical Finding List
- Effect of Current Actions on Previously Published Items
- How to get the Internal Revenue Bulletin
Internal Revenue Bulletin: 2007-13
March 26, 2007
These synopses are intended only as aids to the reader in identifying the subject matter covered. They may not be relied upon as authoritative interpretations.
Rev. Rul. 2007-16 Rev. Rul. 2007-16
Interest rates; underpayments and overpayments. The rate of interest determined under section 6621 of the Code for the calendar quarter beginning April 1, 2007, will be 8 percent for overpayments (7 percent in the case of a corporation), 8 percent for underpayments, and 10 percent for large corporate underpayments. The rate of interest paid on the portion of a corporate overpayment exceeding $10,000 will be 5.5 percent.
Rev. Rul. 2007-17 Rev. Rul. 2007-17
Fringe benefits aircraft valuation formula. The Standard Industry Fare Level (SIFL) cents-per-mile rates and terminal charge in effect for the first half of 2007 are set forth for purposes of determining the value of noncommercial flights on employer-provided aircraft under section 1.61-21(g) of the regulations.
Rev. Rul. 2007-18 Rev. Rul. 2007-18
LIFO; price indexes; department stores. The January 2007 Bureau of Labor Statistics price indexes are accepted for use by department stores employing the retail inventory and last-in, first-out inventory methods for valuing inventories for tax years ended on, or with reference to, January 31, 2007.
T.D. 9313 T.D. 9313
Temporary and proposed regulations under section 368 of the Code provide additional guidance regarding the qualification of certain transactions as reorganizations described in section 368(a)(1)(D) where no stock and/or securities of the acquiring corporation is issued and distributed in the transaction.
REG-157834-06 REG-157834-06
Temporary and proposed regulations under section 368 of the Code provide additional guidance regarding the qualification of certain transactions as reorganizations described in section 368(a)(1)(D) where no stock and/or securities of the acquiring corporation is issued and distributed in the transaction.
Notice 2007-27 Notice 2007-27
Weighted average interest rate update; corporate bond indices; 30-year Treasury securities. The weighted average interest rate for March 2007 and the resulting permissible range of interest rates used to calculate current liability and to determine the required contribution are set forth.
Announcement 2007-33 Announcement 2007-33
A list is provided of organizations now classified as private foundations.
Announcement 2007-34 Announcement 2007-34
The IRS has revoked its determination that American Education Foundation International of San Francisco, CA, and Ladder 12 Firefighters Fund, Inc., of New York, NY, qualify as organizations described in sections 501(c)(3) and 170(c)(2) of the Code.
Rev. Proc. 2007-26 Rev. Proc. 2007-26
This procedure provides issuers of qualified mortgage bonds (QMBs) and qualified mortgage credit certificates (MCCs) with average area purchase price safe harbors for statistical areas in the United States and with a nationwide average purchase price for residences in the United States for purposes of the QMB rules under section 143 of the Code and the MCC rules under section 25. Rev. Proc. 2006-17 obsoleted in part.
Provide America’s taxpayers top quality service by helping them understand and meet their tax responsibilities and by applying the tax law with integrity and fairness to all.
The Internal Revenue Bulletin is the authoritative instrument of the Commissioner of Internal Revenue for announcing official rulings and procedures of the Internal Revenue Service and for publishing Treasury Decisions, Executive Orders, Tax Conventions, legislation, court decisions, and other items of general interest. It is published weekly and may be obtained from the Superintendent of Documents on a subscription basis. Bulletin contents are compiled semiannually into Cumulative Bulletins, which are sold on a single-copy basis.
It is the policy of the Service to publish in the Bulletin all substantive rulings necessary to promote a uniform application of the tax laws, including all rulings that supersede, revoke, modify, or amend any of those previously published in the Bulletin. All published rulings apply retroactively unless otherwise indicated. Procedures relating solely to matters of internal management are not published; however, statements of internal practices and procedures that affect the rights and duties of taxpayers are published.
Revenue rulings represent the conclusions of the Service on the application of the law to the pivotal facts stated in the revenue ruling. In those based on positions taken in rulings to taxpayers or technical advice to Service field offices, identifying details and information of a confidential nature are deleted to prevent unwarranted invasions of privacy and to comply with statutory requirements.
Rulings and procedures reported in the Bulletin do not have the force and effect of Treasury Department Regulations, but they may be used as precedents. Unpublished rulings will not be relied on, used, or cited as precedents by Service personnel in the disposition of other cases. In applying published rulings and procedures, the effect of subsequent legislation, regulations, court decisions, rulings, and procedures must be considered, and Service personnel and others concerned are cautioned against reaching the same conclusions in other cases unless the facts and circumstances are substantially the same.
The Bulletin is divided into four parts as follows:
Part I.—1986 Code. This part includes rulings and decisions based on provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986.
Part II.—Treaties and Tax Legislation. This part is divided into two subparts as follows: Subpart A, Tax Conventions and Other Related Items, and Subpart B, Legislation and Related Committee Reports.
Part III.—Administrative, Procedural, and Miscellaneous. To the extent practicable, pertinent cross references to these subjects are contained in the other Parts and Subparts. Also included in this part are Bank Secrecy Act Administrative Rulings. Bank Secrecy Act Administrative Rulings are issued by the Department of the Treasury’s Office of the Assistant Secretary (Enforcement).
Part IV.—Items of General Interest. This part includes notices of proposed rulemakings, disbarment and suspension lists, and announcements.
The last Bulletin for each month includes a cumulative index for the matters published during the preceding months. These monthly indexes are cumulated on a semiannual basis, and are published in the last Bulletin of each semiannual period.
It is the policy of the Internal Revenue Service to announce at an early date whether it will follow the holdings in certain cases. An Action on Decision is the document making such an announcement. An Action on Decision will be issued at the discretion of the Service only on unappealed issues decided adverse to the government. Generally, an Action on Decision is issued where its guidance would be helpful to Service personnel working with the same or similar issues. Unlike a Treasury Regulation or a Revenue Ruling, an Action on Decision is not an affirmative statement of Service position. It is not intended to serve as public guidance and may not be cited as precedent.
Actions on Decisions shall be relied upon within the Service only as conclusions applying the law to the facts in the particular case at the time the Action on Decision was issued. Caution should be exercised in extending the recommendation of the Action on Decision to similar cases where the facts are different. Moreover, the recommendation in the Action on Decision may be superseded by new legislation, regulations, rulings, cases, or Actions on Decisions.
Prior to 1991, the Service published acquiescence or nonacquiescence only in certain regular Tax Court opinions. The Service has expanded its acquiescence program to include other civil tax cases where guidance is determined to be helpful. Accordingly, the Service now may acquiesce or nonacquiesce in the holdings of memorandum Tax Court opinions, as well as those of the United States District Courts, Claims Court, and Circuit Courts of Appeal. Regardless of the court deciding the case, the recommendation of any Action on Decision will be published in the Internal Revenue Bulletin.
The recommendation in every Action on Decision will be summarized as acquiescence, acquiescence in result only, or nonacquiescence. Both “acquiescence” and “acquiescence in result only” mean that the Service accepts the holding of the court in a case and that the Service will follow it in disposing of cases with the same controlling facts. However, “acquiescence” indicates neither approval nor disapproval of the reasons assigned by the court for its conclusions; whereas, “acquiescence in result only” indicates disagreement or concern with some or all of those reasons. “Nonacquiescence” signifies that, although no further review was sought, the Service does not agree with the holding of the court and, generally, will not follow the decision in disposing of cases involving other taxpayers. In reference to an opinion of a circuit court of appeals, a “nonacquiescence” indicates that the Service will not follow the holding on a nationwide basis. However, the Service will recognize the precedential impact of the opinion on cases arising within the venue of the deciding circuit.
The Actions on Decisions published in the weekly Internal Revenue Bulletin are consolidated semiannually and appear in the first Bulletin for July and the Cumulative Bulletin for the first half of the year. A semiannual consolidation also appears in the first Bulletin for the following January and in the Cumulative Bulletin for the last half of the year.
The Commissioner does NOT ACQUIESCE in the following decision:
Moore v. Commissioner,[1]
T.C. Memo. 2006-171,
T.C. Docket No. 11634-05L
[1] Nonacquiescence relating to whether prohibited ex parte communications during a collection due process hearing before the Office of Appeals may be remedied by sharing the content of the communications with the taxpayer and allowing the taxpayer an opportunity to respond.
Fringe benefits aircraft valuation formula. The Standard Industry Fare Level (SIFL) cents-per-mile rates and terminal charge in effect for the first half of 2007 are set forth for purposes of determining the value of noncommercial flights on employer-provided aircraft under section 1.61-21(g) of the regulations.
For purposes of the taxation of fringe benefits under section 61 of the Internal Revenue Code, section 1.61-21(g) of the Income Tax Regulations provides a rule for valuing noncommercial flights on employer-provided aircraft. Section 1.61-21(g)(5) provides an aircraft valuation formula to determine the value of such flights. The value of a flight is determined under the base aircraft valuation formula (also known as the Standard Industry Fare Level formula or SIFL) by multiplying the SIFL cents-per-mile rates applicable for the period during which the flight was taken by the appropriate aircraft multiple provided in section 1.61-21(g)(7) and then adding the applicable terminal charge. The SIFL cents-per-mile rates in the formula and the terminal charge are calculated by the Department of Transportation and are reviewed semi-annually.
The following chart sets forth the terminal charge and SIFL mileage rates:
Period During Which the Flight Is Taken | Terminal Charge | SIFL Mileage Rates |
---|---|---|
1/1/07 - 6/30/07 | $37.92 | Up to 500 miles = $.2075 per mile |
501-1500 miles = $.1582 per mile | ||
Over 1500 miles = $.1521 per mile |
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Internal Revenue Service
26 CFR Part 1
This document contains temporary regulations amending §1.368-2T(l), which provides guidance regarding the qualification of certain transactions as reorganizations described in section 368(a)(1)(D) where no stock and/or securities of the acquiring corporation are issued and distributed in the transaction. These regulations clarify that the rules in §1.368-2T(l) are not intended to affect the qualification of related party triangular asset acquisitions as reorganizations described in section 368. These regulations affect corporations engaging in such transactions and their shareholders. The text of the temporary regulations also serves as the text of the proposed regulations (REG-157834-06) set forth in the notice of proposed rulemaking on this subject in this issue of the Bulletin.
Effective Date: These regulations are effective on March 1, 2007.
Applicability Date: For dates of applicability, see §1.368-2T(l)(4)(i).
On December 19, 2006, the IRS and Treasury Department published temporary regulations (T.D. 9303, 2007-5 I.R.B. 379) under §1.368-2T(l) in the Federal Register (71 FR 75879) providing guidance regarding the qualification of certain transactions as reorganizations described in section 368(a)(1)(D) where no stock and/or securities of the acquiring corporation are issued and distributed in the transaction. Under the temporary regulations, in cases where it is determined that the same person or persons own, directly or indirectly, all of the stock of the transferor and transferee corporations in identical proportions, the distribution requirement under sections 368(a)(1)(D) and 354(b)(1)(B) will be treated as satisfied even though no stock is actually issued in the transaction.
In each case where it is determined that the same person or persons own all of the stock of the transferor and transferee corporations in identical proportions, a nominal share of stock of the transferee corporation will be deemed issued in addition to the actual consideration exchanged in the transaction. The nominal share of stock in the transferee corporation will then be deemed distributed by the transferor corporation to its shareholders and, in appropriate circumstances, further transferred to the extent necessary to reflect the actual ownership of the transferor and transferee corporations.
The IRS and Treasury Department have become aware that the temporary regulations may have unintended consequences regarding related party triangular asset acquisitions otherwise qualifying under section 368. Specifically, the temporary regulations may cause certain related party asset acquisitions that would otherwise qualify as tax-free triangular reorganizations to be treated as reorganizations described in section 368(a)(1)(D) with boot.
For example, the temporary regulations may cause a related party transaction that would otherwise qualify as a tax-free reorganization described in section 368(a)(1)(C) in which substantially all of the target corporation’s properties are acquired solely in exchange for voting stock of the corporation in control of the acquiring corporation to also be described in section 368(a)(1)(D). If so, section 368(a)(2)(A) would preclude the transaction from being treated as described in section 368(a)(1)(C). Accordingly, the transaction would be treated as described only in section 368(a)(1)(D), and the voting stock of the corporation in control of the acquiring corporation would be treated as boot. Further, the temporary regulations may cause a related party transaction that would otherwise qualify as a tax-free reorganization described in section 368(a)(1)(A) by reason of section 368(a)(2)(D) from so qualifying because the deemed issuance of a nominal share of stock of the acquiring corporation would violate the requirements of section 368(a)(2)(D)(i). If so, the transaction would be treated as described only in section 368(a)(1)(D), and the stock of the corporation in control of the acquiring corporation would be treated as boot.
The IRS and Treasury Department did not intend for the temporary regulations to apply to such transactions.
These temporary regulations clarify and amend the temporary regulations (T.D. 9303) under §1.368-2T(l) by providing that the deemed issuance of the nominal share of stock of the transferee corporation in a transaction otherwise described in section 368(a)(1)(D) does not apply if the transaction otherwise qualifies as a triangular reorganization described in §1.358-6(b)(2) or section 368(a)(1)(G) by reason of section 368(a)(2)(D). Accordingly, if a transaction qualifies as a triangular reorganization described in §1.358-6(b)(2) or section 368(a)(1)(G) by reason of section 368(a)(2)(D) without regard to the temporary regulations, it will not be treated as a reorganization described in section 368(a)(1)(D).
It has been determined that this Treasury decision is not a significant regulatory action as defined in Executive Order 12866. Therefore, a regulatory assessment is not required. It also has been determined that section 553(b) of the Administrative Procedure Act (5 U.S.C. chapter 5) does not apply to these regulations. For the applicability of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, please refer to the cross-reference notice of proposed rulemaking published elsewhere in this issue of the Bulletin. Pursuant to section 7805(f) of the Internal Revenue Code, these regulations were submitted to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small Business Administration for comment on their impact on small business.
Accordingly, 26 CFR part 1 is amended as follows:
Paragraph 1. The authority citation for part 1 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 26 U.S.C. 7805 * * *
Par. 2. Section 1.368-2T is amended by adding paragraph (l)(2)(iv) to read as follows:
* * * * *
(l) * * *
(2) * * *
(iv) Exception. Paragraph (l)(2) of this section does not apply to a transaction otherwise described in §1.358-6(b)(2) or section 368(a)(1)(G) by reason of section 368(a)(2)(D).
* * * * *
Kevin M. Brown,Deputy Commissioner for
Services and Enforcement.
Approved February 21, 2007.
Eric Solomon,Assistant Secretary of
the Treasury (Tax Policy).
LIFO; price indexes; department stores. The January 2007 Bureau of Labor Statistics price indexes are accepted for use by department stores employing the retail inventory and last-in, first-out inventory methods for valuing inventories for tax years ended on, or with reference to, January 31, 2007.
The following Department Store Inventory Price Indexes for January 2007 were issued by the Bureau of Labor Statistics. The indexes are accepted by the Internal Revenue Service, under § 1.472-1(k) of the Income Tax Regulations and Rev. Proc. 86-46, 1986-2 C.B. 739, for appropriate application to inventories of department stores employing the retail inventory and last-in, first-out inventory methods for tax years ended on, or with reference to, January 31, 2007.
The Department Store Inventory Price Indexes are prepared on a national basis and include (a) 23 major groups of departments, (b) three special combinations of the major groups — soft goods, durable goods, and miscellaneous goods, and (c) a store total, which covers all departments, including some not listed separately, except for the following: candy, food, liquor, tobacco, and contract departments.
BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS, DEPARTMENT STORE INVENTORY PRICE INDEXES BY DEPARTMENT GROUPS (January 1941 = 100, unless otherwise noted) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Groups | Jan. 2006 | Jan. 2007 | Percent Change From Jan. 2006 to Jan. 20071 | |
1. | Piece Goods | 436.7 | 434.9 | -0.4 |
2. | Domestics and Draperies | 506.9 | 475.2 | -6.3 |
3. | Women’s and Children’s Shoes | 671.3 | 645.4 | -3.9 |
4. | Men’s Shoes | 868.1 | 875.2 | 0.8 |
5. | Infants’ Wear | 555.2 | 558.2 | 0.5 |
6. | Women’s Underwear | 545.6 | 551.7 | 1.1 |
7. | Women’s Hosiery | 341.3 | 344.7 | 1.0 |
8. | Women’s and Girls’ Accessories | 555.4 | 537.2 | -3.3 |
9. | Women’s Outerwear and Girls’ Wear | 325.7 | 338.1 | 3.8 |
10. | Men’s Clothing | 516.8 | 514.5 | -0.4 |
11. | Men’s Furnishings | 555.5 | 559.2 | 0.7 |
12. | Boys’ Clothing and Furnishings | 396.5 | 371.0 | -6.4 |
13. | Jewelry | 868.9 | 909.5 | 4.7 |
14. | Notions | 794.2 | 817.1 | 2.9 |
15. | Toilet Articles and Drugs | 1010.7 | 1004.5 | -0.6 |
16. | Furniture and Bedding | 603.9 | 597.1 | -1.1 |
17. | Floor Coverings | 611.0 | 613.7 | 0.4 |
18. | Housewares | 699.4 | 689.4 | -1.4 |
19. | Major Appliances | 204.3 | 210.2 | 2.9 |
20. | Radio and Television | 37.4 | 33.6 | -10.2 |
21. | Recreation and Education2 | 77.3 | 76.3 | -1.3 |
22. | Home Improvements2 | 138.0 | 141.3 | 2.4 |
23. | Automotive Accessories2 | 117.2 | 122.4 | 4.4 |
Groups 1-15: Soft Goods | 540.9 | 542.1 | 0.2 | |
Groups 16-20: Durable Goods | 375.6 | 370.6 | -1.3 | |
Groups 21-23: Misc. Goods2 | 93.1 | 93.9 | 0.9 | |
Store Total3 | 482.8 | 482.8 | 0.0 | |
1Absence of a minus sign before the percentage change in this column signifies a price increase. | ||||
2Indexes on a January 1986 = 100 base. | ||||
3The store total index covers all departments, including some not listed separately, except for the following: candy, food, liquor, tobacco, and contract departments. |
Interest rates; underpayments and overpayments. The rate of interest determined under section 6621 of the Code for the calendar quarter beginning April 1, 2007, will be 8 percent for overpayments (7 percent in the case of a corporation), 8 percent for underpayments, and 10 percent for large corporate underpayments. The rate of interest paid on the portion of a corporate overpayment exceeding $10,000 will be 5.5 percent.
Section 6621 of the Internal Revenue Code establishes the rates for interest on tax overpayments and tax underpayments. Under section 6621(a)(1), the overpayment rate is the sum of the federal short-term rate plus 3 percentage points (2 percentage points in the case of a corporation), except the rate for the portion of a corporate overpayment of tax exceeding $10,000 for a taxable period is the sum of the federal short-term rate plus 0.5 of a percentage point for interest computations made after December 31, 1994. Under section 6621(a)(2), the underpayment rate is the sum of the federal short-term rate plus 3 percentage points.
Section 6621(c) provides that for purposes of interest payable under section 6601 on any large corporate underpayment, the underpayment rate under section 6621(a)(2) is determined by substituting “5 percentage points” for “3 percentage points.” See section 6621(c) and section 301.6621-3 of the Regulations on Procedure and Administration for the definition of a large corporate underpayment and for the rules for determining the applicable date. Section 6621(c) and section 301.6621-3 are generally effective for periods after December 31, 1990.
Section 6621(b)(1) provides that the Secretary will determine the federal short-term rate for the first month in each calendar quarter.
Section 6621(b)(2)(A) provides that the federal short-term rate determined under section 6621(b)(1) for any month applies during the first calendar quarter beginning after such month.
Section 6621(b)(2)(B) provides that in determining the addition to tax under section 6654 for failure to pay estimated tax for any taxable year, the federal short-term rate that applies during the third month following such taxable year also applies during the first 15 days of the fourth month following such taxable year.
Section 6621(b)(3) provides that the federal short-term rate for any month is the federal short-term rate determined during such month by the Secretary in accordance with § 1274(d), rounded to the nearest full percent (or, if a multiple of 1/2 of 1 percent, the rate is increased to the next highest full percent).
Notice 88-59, 1988-1 C.B. 546, announced that, in determining the quarterly interest rates to be used for overpayments and underpayments of tax under section 6621, the Internal Revenue Service will use the federal short-term rate based on daily compounding because that rate is most consistent with section 6621 which, pursuant to section 6622, is subject to daily compounding.
Rounded to the nearest full percent, the federal short-term rate based on daily compounding determined during the month of January 2007 is 5 percent. Accordingly, an overpayment rate of 8 percent (7 percent in the case of a corporation) and an underpayment rate of 8 percent are established for the calendar quarter beginning April 1, 2007. The overpayment rate for the portion of a corporate overpayment exceeding $10,000 for the calendar quarter beginning April 1, 2007, is 5.5 percent. The underpayment rate for large corporate underpayments for the calendar quarter beginning April 1, 2007, is 10 percent. These rates apply to amounts bearing interest during that calendar quarter.
Under section 6621(b)(2)(B), the 8 percent rate that applies to estimated tax underpayments for the first calendar quarter in 2007, as provided in Rev. Rul. 2006-63, 2006-52 I.R.B. 1143, also applies to such underpayments for the first 15 days in April 2007.
Interest factors for daily compound interest for annual rates of 5.5 percent, 7 percent, 8 percent, and 10 percent are published in Tables 16, 19, 21, and 25 of Rev. Proc. 95-17, 1995-1 C.B. 556, 570, 573, 575, and 579.
Annual interest rates to be compounded daily pursuant to section 6622 that apply for prior periods are set forth in the tables accompanying this revenue ruling.
The principal author of this revenue ruling is Raymond Bailey of the Office of Associate Chief Counsel (Procedure & Administration). For further information regarding this revenue ruling, contact Mr. Bailey at (202) 622-4910 (not a toll-free call).
TABLE OF INTEREST RATES | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
PERIODS BEFORE JUL. 1, 1975 — PERIODS ENDING DEC. 31, 1986 | ||||
OVERPAYMENTS AND UNDERPAYMENTS | ||||
PERIOD | RATE | In 1995-1 C.B. DAILY RATE TABLE | ||
Before Jul. 1, 1975 | 6% | Table 2, pg.557 | ||
Jul. 1, 1975—Jan. 31, 1976 | 9% | Table 4, pg.559 | ||
Feb. 1, 1976—Jan. 31, 1978 | 7% | Table 3, pg.558 | ||
Feb. 1, 1978—Jan. 31, 1980 | 6% | Table 2, pg.557 | ||
Feb. 1, 1980—Jan. 31, 1982 | 12% | Table 5, pg.560 | ||
Feb. 1, 1982—Dec. 31, 1982 | 20% | Table 6, pg.560 | ||
Jan. 1, 1983—Jun. 30, 1983 | 16% | Table 37, pg. 591 | ||
Jul. 1, 1983—Dec. 31, 1983 | 11% | Table 27, pg. 581 | ||
Jan. 1, 1984—Jun. 30, 1984 | 11% | Table 75, pg. 629 | ||
Jul. 1, 1984—Dec. 31, 1984 | 11% | Table 75, pg. 629 | ||
Jan. 1, 1985—Jun. 30, 1985 | 13% | Table 31, pg. 585 | ||
Jul. 1, 1985—Dec. 31, 1985 | 11% | Table 27, pg. 581 | ||
Jan. 1, 1986—Jun. 30, 1986 | 10% | Table 25, pg. 579 | ||
Jul. 1, 1986—Dec. 31, 1986 | 9% | Table 23, pg. 577 |
TABLE OF INTEREST RATES | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FROM JAN. 1, 1987 — DEC. 31, 1998 | ||||||
OVERPAYMENTS | UNDERPAYMENTS | |||||
1995-1 C.B. | 1995-1 C.B. | |||||
RATE | TABLE | PG | RATE | TABLE | PG | |
Jan. 1, 1987—Mar. 31, 1987 | 8% | 21 | 575 | 9% | 23 | 577 |
Apr. 1, 1987—Jun. 30, 1987 | 8% | 21 | 575 | 9% | 23 | 577 |
Jul. 1, 1987—Sep. 30, 1987 | 8% | 21 | 575 | 9% | 23 | 577 |
Oct. 1, 1987—Dec. 31, 1987 | 9% | 23 | 577 | 10% | 25 | 579 |
Jan. 1, 1988—Mar. 31, 1988 | 10% | 73 | 627 | 11% | 75 | 629 |
Apr. 1, 1988—Jun. 30, 1988 | 9% | 71 | 625 | 10% | 73 | 627 |
Jul. 1, 1988—Sep. 30, 1988 | 9% | 71 | 625 | 10% | 73 | 627 |
Oct. 1, 1988—Dec. 31, 1988 | 10% | 73 | 627 | 11% | 75 | 629 |
Jan. 1, 1989—Mar. 31, 1989 | 10% | 25 | 579 | 11% | 27 | 581 |
Apr. 1, 1989—Jun. 30, 1989 | 11% | 27 | 581 | 12% | 29 | 583 |
Jul. 1, 1989—Sep. 30, 1989 | 11% | 27 | 581 | 12% | 29 | 583 |
Oct. 1, 1989—Dec. 31, 1989 | 10% | 25 | 579 | 11% | 27 | 581 |
Jan. 1, 1990—Mar. 31, 1990 | 10% | 25 | 579 | 11% | 27 | 581 |
Apr. 1, 1990—Jun. 30, 1990 | 10% | 25 | 579 | 11% | 27 | 581 |
Jul. 1, 1990—Sep. 30, 1990 | 10% | 25 | 579 | 11% | 27 | 581 |
Oct. 1, 1990—Dec. 31, 1990 | 10% | 25 | 579 | 11% | 27 | 581 |
Jan. 1, 1991—Mar. 31, 1991 | 10% | 25 | 579 | 11% | 27 | 581 |
Apr. 1, 1991—Jun. 30, 1991 | 9% | 23 | 577 | 10% | 25 | 579 |
Jul. 1, 1991—Sep. 30, 1991 | 9% | 23 | 577 | 10% | 25 | 579 |
Oct. 1, 1991—Dec. 31, 1991 | 9% | 23 | 577 | 10% | 25 | 579 |
Jan. 1, 1992—Mar. 31, 1992 | 8% | 69 | 623 | 9% | 71 | 625 |
Apr. 1, 1992—Jun. 30, 1992 | 7% | 67 | 621 | 8% | 69 | 623 |
Jul. 1, 1992—Sep. 30, 1992 | 7% | 67 | 621 | 8% | 69 | 623 |
Oct. 1, 1992—Dec. 31, 1992 | 6% | 65 | 619 | 7% | 67 | 621 |
Jan. 1, 1993—Mar. 31, 1993 | 6% | 17 | 571 | 7% | 19 | 573 |
Apr. 1, 1993—Jun. 30, 1993 | 6% | 17 | 571 | 7% | 19 | 573 |
Jul. 1, 1993—Sep. 30, 1993 | 6% | 17 | 571 | 7% | 19 | 573 |
Oct. 1, 1993—Dec. 31, 1993 | 6% | 17 | 571 | 7% | 19 | 573 |
Jan. 1, 1994—Mar. 31, 1994 | 6% | 17 | 571 | 7% | 19 | 573 |
Apr. 1, 1994—Jun. 30, 1994 | 6% | 17 | 571 | 7% | 19 | 573 |
Jul. 1, 1994—Sep. 30, 1994 | 7% | 19 | 573 | 8% | 21 | 575 |
Oct. 1, 1994—Dec. 31, 1994 | 8% | 21 | 575 | 9% | 23 | 577 |
Jan. 1, 1995—Mar. 31, 1995 | 8% | 21 | 575 | 9% | 23 | 577 |
Apr. 1, 1995—Jun. 30, 1995 | 9% | 23 | 577 | 10% | 25 | 579 |
Jul. 1, 1995—Sep. 30, 1995 | 8% | 21 | 575 | 9% | 23 | 577 |
Oct. 1, 1995—Dec. 31, 1995 | 8% | 21 | 575 | 9% | 23 | 577 |
Jan. 1, 1996—Mar. 31, 1996 | 8% | 69 | 623 | 9% | 71 | 625 |
Apr. 1, 1996—Jun. 30, 1996 | 7% | 67 | 621 | 8% | 69 | 623 |
Jul. 1, 1996—Sep. 30, 1996 | 8% | 69 | 623 | 9% | 71 | 625 |
Oct. 1, 1996—Dec. 31, 1996 | 8% | 69 | 623 | 9% | 71 | 625 |
Jan. 1, 1997—Mar. 31, 1997 | 8% | 21 | 575 | 9% | 23 | 577 |
Apr. 1, 1997—Jun. 30, 1997 | 8% | 21 | 575 | 9% | 23 | 577 |
Jul. 1, 1997—Sep. 30, 1997 | 8% | 21 | 575 | 9% | 23 | 577 |
Oct. 1, 1997—Dec. 31, 1997 | 8% | 21 | 575 | 9% | 23 | 577 |
Jan. 1, 1998—Mar. 31, 1998 | 8% | 21 | 575 | 9% | 23 | 577 |
Apr. 1, 1998—Jun. 30, 1998 | 7% | 19 | 573 | 8% | 21 | 575 |
Jul. 1, 1998—Sep. 30, 1998 | 7% | 19 | 573 | 8% | 21 | 575 |
Oct. 1, 1998—Dec. 31, 1998 | 7% | 19 | 573 | 8% | 21 | 575 |
TABLE OF INTEREST RATES | |||
---|---|---|---|
FROM JANUARY 1, 1999 — PRESENT | |||
NONCORPORATE OVERPAYMENTS AND UNDERPAYMENTS | |||
1995-1 C.B. | |||
RATE | TABLE | PAGE | |
Jan. 1, 1999—Mar. 31, 1999 | 7% | 19 | 573 |
Apr. 1, 1999—Jun. 30, 1999 | 8% | 21 | 575 |
Jul. 1, 1999—Sep. 30, 1999 | 8% | 21 | 575 |
Oct. 1, 1999—Dec. 31, 1999 | 8% | 21 | 575 |
Jan. 1, 2000—Mar. 31, 2000 | 8% | 69 | 623 |
Apr. 1, 2000—Jun. 30, 2000 | 9% | 71 | 625 |
Jul. 1, 2000—Sep. 30, 2000 | 9% | 71 | 625 |
Oct. 1, 2000—Dec. 31, 2000 | 9% | 71 | 625 |
Jan. 1, 2001—Mar. 31, 2001 | 9% | 23 | 577 |
Apr. 1, 2001—Jun. 30, 2001 | 8% | 21 | 575 |
Jul. 1, 2001—Sep. 30, 2001 | 7% | 19 | 573 |
Oct. 1, 2001—Dec. 31, 2001 | 7% | 19 | 573 |
Jan. 1, 2002—Mar. 31, 2002 | 6% | 17 | 571 |
Apr. 1, 2002—Jun. 30, 2002 | 6% | 17 | 571 |
Jul. 1, 2002—Sep. 30, 2002 | 6% | 17 | 571 |
Oct. 1, 2002—Dec. 31, 2002 | 6% | 17 | 571 |
Jan. 1, 2003—Mar. 31, 2003 | 5% | 15 | 569 |
Apr. 1, 2003—Jun. 30, 2003 | 5% | 15 | 569 |
Jul. 1, 2003—Sep. 30, 2003 | 5% | 15 | 569 |
Oct. 1, 2003—Dec. 31, 2003 | 4% | 13 | 567 |
Jan. 1, 2004—Mar. 31, 2004 | 4% | 61 | 615 |
Apr. 1, 2004—Jun. 30, 2004 | 5% | 63 | 617 |
Jul. 1, 2004—Sep. 30, 2004 | 4% | 61 | 615 |
Oct. 1, 2004—Dec. 31, 2004 | 5% | 63 | 617 |
Jan. 1, 2005—Mar. 31, 2005 | 5% | 15 | 569 |
Apr. 1, 2005—Jun. 30, 2005 | 6% | 17 | 571 |
Jul. 1, 2005—Sep. 30, 2005 | 6% | 17 | 571 |
Oct. 1, 2005—Dec. 31, 2005 | 7% | 19 | 573 |
Jan. 1, 2006—Mar. 31, 2006 | 7% | 19 | 573 |
Apr. 1, 2006—Jun. 30, 2006 | 7% | 19 | 573 |
Jul. 1, 2006—Sep. 30, 2006 | 8% | 21 | 575 |
Oct. 1, 2006—Dec. 31, 2006 | 8% | 21 | 575 |
Jan. 1, 2007—Mar. 31, 2007 | 8% | 21 | 575 |
Apr. 1, 2007— Jun. 30, 2007 | 8% | 21 | 575 |
TABLE OF INTEREST RATES | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FROM JANUARY 1, 1999 — PRESENT | ||||||
CORPORATE OVERPAYMENTS AND UNDERPAYMENTS | ||||||
OVERPAYMENTS | UNDERPAYMENTS | |||||
1995-1 C.B. | 1995-1 C.B. | |||||
RATE | TABLE | PG | RATE | TABLE | PG | |
Jan. 1, 1999—Mar. 31, 1999 | 6% | 17 | 571 | 7% | 19 | 573 |
Apr. 1, 1999—Jun. 30, 1999 | 7% | 19 | 573 | 8% | 21 | 575 |
Jul. 1, 1999—Sep. 30, 1999 | 7% | 19 | 573 | 8% | 21 | 575 |
Oct. 1, 1999—Dec. 31, 1999 | 7% | 19 | 573 | 8% | 21 | 575 |
Jan. 1, 2000—Mar. 31, 2000 | 7% | 67 | 621 | 8% | 69 | 623 |
Apr. 1, 2000—Jun. 30, 2000 | 8% | 69 | 623 | 9% | 71 | 625 |
Jul. 1, 2000—Sep. 30, 2000 | 8% | 69 | 623 | 9% | 71 | 625 |
Oct. 1, 2000—Dec. 31, 2000 | 8% | 69 | 623 | 9% | 71 | 625 |
Jan. 1, 2001—Mar. 31, 2001 | 8% | 21 | 575 | 9% | 23 | 577 |
Apr. 1, 2001—Jun. 30, 2001 | 7% | 19 | 573 | 8% | 21 | 575 |
Jul. 1, 2001—Sep. 30, 2001 | 6% | 17 | 571 | 7% | 19 | 573 |
Oct. 1, 2001—Dec. 31, 2001 | 6% | 17 | 571 | 7% | 19 | 573 |
Jan. 1, 2002—Mar. 31, 2002 | 5% | 15 | 569 | 6% | 17 | 571 |
Apr. 1, 2002—Jun. 30, 2002 | 5% | 15 | 569 | 6% | 17 | 571 |
Jul. 1, 2002—Sep. 30, 2002 | 5% | 15 | 569 | 6% | 17 | 571 |
Oct. 1, 2002—Dec. 31, 2002 | 5% | 15 | 569 | 6% | 17 | 571 |
Jan. 1, 2003—Mar. 31, 2003 | 4% | 13 | 567 | 5% | 15 | 569 |
Apr. 1, 2003—Jun. 30, 2003 | 4% | 13 | 567 | 5% | 15 | 569 |
Jul. 1, 2003—Sep. 30, 2003 | 4% | 13 | 567 | 5% | 15 | 569 |
Oct. 1, 2003—Dec. 31, 2003 | 3% | 11 | 565 | 4% | 13 | 567 |
Jan. 1, 2004—Mar. 31, 2004 | 3% | 59 | 613 | 4% | 61 | 615 |
Apr. 1, 2004—Jun. 30, 2004 | 4% | 61 | 615 | 5% | 63 | 617 |
Jul. 1, 2004—Sep. 30, 2004 | 3% | 59 | 613 | 4% | 61 | 615 |
Oct. 1, 2004—Dec. 31, 2004 | 4% | 61 | 615 | 5% | 63 | 617 |
Jan. 1, 2005—Mar. 31, 2005 | 4% | 13 | 567 | 5% | 15 | 569 |
Apr. 1, 2005—Jun. 30, 2005 | 5% | 15 | 569 | 6% | 17 | 571 |
Jul. 1, 2005—Sep. 30, 2005 | 5% | 15 | 569 | 6% | 17 | 571 |
Oct. 1, 2005—Dec. 31, 2005 | 6% | 17 | 571 | 7% | 19 | 573 |
Jan. 1, 2006—Mar. 31, 2006 | 6% | 17 | 571 | 7% | 19 | 573 |
Apr. 1, 2006—Jun. 30, 2006 | 6% | 17 | 571 | 7% | 19 | 573 |
Jul. 1, 2006—Sep. 30, 2006 | 7% | 19 | 573 | 8% | 21 | 575 |
Oct. 1, 2006—Dec. 31, 2006 | 7% | 19 | 573 | 8% | 21 | 575 |
Jan. 1, 2007—Mar. 31, 2007 | 7% | 19 | 573 | 8% | 21 | 575 |
Apr. 1, 2007—Jun. 30, 2007 | 7% | 19 | 573 | 8% | 21 | 575 |
TABLE OF INTEREST RATES FOR | |||
---|---|---|---|
LARGE CORPORATE UNDERPAYMENTS | |||
FROM JANUARY 1, 1991 — PRESENT | |||
1995-1 C.B. | |||
RATE | TABLE | PG | |
Jan. 1, 1991—Mar. 31, 1991 | 13% | 31 | 585 |
Apr. 1, 1991—Jun. 30, 1991 | 12% | 29 | 583 |
Jul. 1, 1991—Sep. 30, 1991 | 12% | 29 | 583 |
Oct. 1, 1991—Dec. 31, 1991 | 12% | 29 | 583 |
Jan. 1, 1992—Mar. 31, 1992 | 11% | 75 | 629 |
Apr. 1, 1992—Jun. 30, 1992 | 10% | 73 | 627 |
Jul. 1, 1992—Sep. 30, 1992 | 10% | 73 | 627 |
Oct. 1, 1992—Dec. 31, 1992 | 9% | 71 | 625 |
Jan. 1, 1993—Mar. 31, 1993 | 9% | 23 | 577 |
Apr. 1, 1993—Jun. 30, 1993 | 9% | 23 | 577 |
Jul. 1, 1993—Sep. 30, 1993 | 9% | 23 | 577 |
Oct. 1, 1993—Dec. 31, 1993 | 9% | 23 | 577 |
Jan. 1, 1994—Mar. 31, 1994 | 9% | 23 | 577 |
Apr. 1, 1994—Jun. 30, 1994 | 9% | 23 | 577 |
Jul. 1, 1994—Sep. 30, 1994 | 10% | 25 | 579 |
Oct. 1, 1994—Dec. 31, 1994 | 11% | 27 | 581 |
Jan. 1, 1995—Mar. 31, 1995 | 11% | 27 | 581 |
Apr. 1, 1995—Jun. 30, 1995 | 12% | 29 | 583 |
Jul. 1, 1995—Sep. 30, 1995 | 11% | 27 | 581 |
Oct. 1, 1995—Dec. 31, 1995 | 11% | 27 | 581 |
Jan. 1, 1996—Mar. 31, 1996 | 11% | 75 | 629 |
Apr. 1, 1996—Jun. 30, 1996 | 10% | 73 | 627 |
Jul. 1, 1996—Sep. 30, 1996 | 11% | 75 | 629 |
Oct. 1, 1996—Dec. 31, 1996 | 11% | 75 | 629 |
Jan. 1, 1997—Mar. 31, 1997 | 11% | 27 | 581 |
Apr. 1, 1997—Jun. 30, 1997 | 11% | 27 | 581 |
Jul. 1, 1997—Sep. 30, 1997 | 11% | 27 | 581 |
Oct. 1, 1997—Dec. 31, 1997 | 11% | 27 | 581 |
Jan. 1, 1998—Mar. 31, 1998 | 11% | 27 | 581 |
Apr. 1, 1998—Jun. 30, 1998 | 10% | 25 | 579 |
Jul. 1, 1998—Sep. 30, 1998 | 10% | 25 | 579 |
Oct. 1, 1998—Dec. 31, 1998 | 10% | 25 | 579 |
Jan. 1, 1999—Mar. 31, 1999 | 9% | 23 | 577 |
Apr. 1, 1999—Jun. 30, 1999 | 10% | 25 | 579 |
Jul. 1, 1999—Sep. 30, 1999 | 10% | 25 | 579 |
Oct. 1, 1999—Dec. 31, 1999 | 10% | 25 | 579 |
Jan. 1, 2000—Mar. 31, 2000 | 10% | 73 | 627 |
Apr. 1, 2000—Jun. 30, 2000 | 11% | 75 | 629 |
Jul. 1, 2000—Sep. 30, 2000 | 11% | 75 | 629 |
Oct. 1, 2000—Dec. 31, 2000 | 11% | 75 | 629 |
Jan. 1, 2001—Mar. 31, 2001 | 11% | 27 | 581 |
Apr. 1, 2001—Jun. 30, 2001 | 10% | 25 | 579 |
Jul. 1, 2001—Sep. 30, 2001 | 9% | 23 | 577 |
Oct. 1, 2001—Dec. 31, 2001 | 9% | 23 | 577 |
Jan. 1, 2002—Mar. 31, 2002 | 8% | 21 | 575 |
Apr. 1, 2002—Jun. 30, 2002 | 8% | 21 | 575 |
Jul. 1, 2002—Sep. 30, 2002 | 8% | 21 | 575 |
Oct. 1, 2002—Dec. 31, 2002 | 8% | 21 | 575 |
Jan. 1, 2003—Mar. 31, 2003 | 7% | 19 | 573 |
Apr. 1, 2003—Jun. 30, 2003 | 7% | 19 | 573 |
Jul. 1, 2003—Sep. 30, 2003 | 7% | 19 | 573 |
Oct. 1, 2003—Dec. 31, 2003 | 6% | 17 | 571 |
Jan. 1, 2004—Mar. 31, 2004 | 6% | 65 | 619 |
Apr. 1, 2004—Jun. 30, 2004 | 7% | 67 | 621 |
Jul. 1, 2004—Sep. 30, 2004 | 6% | 65 | 619 |
Oct. 1, 2004—Dec. 31, 2004 | 7% | 67 | 621 |
Jan. 1, 2005—Mar. 31, 2005 | 7% | 19 | 573 |
Apr. 1, 2005—Jun. 30, 2005 | 8% | 21 | 575 |
Jul. 1, 2005—Sep. 30, 2005 | 8% | 21 | 575 |
Oct. 1, 2005—Dec. 31, 2005 | 9% | 23 | 577 |
Jan. 1, 2006—Mar. 31, 2006 | 9% | 23 | 577 |
Apr. 1, 2006—Jun. 30, 2006 | 9% | 23 | 577 |
Jul. 1, 2006—Sep. 30, 2006 | 10% | 25 | 579 |
Oct. 1, 2006—Dec. 31, 2006 | 10% | 25 | 579 |
Jan. 1, 2007—Mar. 31, 2007 | 10% | 25 | 579 |
Apr. 1, 2007—Jun. 30, 2007 | 10% | 25 | 579 |
TABLE OF INTEREST RATES FOR CORPORATE | |||
---|---|---|---|
OVERPAYMENTS EXCEEDING $10,000 | |||
FROM JANUARY 1, 1995 — PRESENT | |||
1995-1 C.B. | |||
RATE | TABLE | PG | |
Jan. 1, 1995—Mar. 31, 1995 | 6.5% | 18 | 572 |
Apr. 1, 1995—Jun. 30, 1995 | 7.5% | 20 | 574 |
Jul. 1, 1995—Sep. 30, 1995 | 6.5% | 18 | 572 |
Oct. 1, 1995—Dec. 31, 1995 | 6.5% | 18 | 572 |
Jan. 1, 1996—Mar. 31, 1996 | 6.5% | 66 | 620 |
Apr. 1, 1996—Jun. 30, 1996 | 5.5% | 64 | 618 |
Jul. 1, 1996—Sep. 30, 1996 | 6.5% | 66 | 620 |
Oct. 1, 1996—Dec. 31, 1996 | 6.5% | 66 | 620 |
Jan. 1, 1997—Mar. 31, 1997 | 6.5% | 18 | 572 |
Apr. 1, 1997—Jun. 30, 1997 | 6.5% | 18 | 572 |
Jul. 1, 1997—Sep. 30, 1997 | 6.5% | 18 | 572 |
Oct. 1, 1997—Dec. 31, 1997 | 6.5% | 18 | 572 |
Jan. 1, 1998—Mar. 31, 1998 | 6.5% | 18 | 572 |
Apr. 1, 1998—Jun. 30, 1998 | 5.5% | 16 | 570 |
Jul. 1, 1998—Sep. 30, 1998 | 5.5% | 16 | 570 |
Oct. 1, 1998—Dec. 31, 1998 | 5.5% | 16 | 570 |
Jan. 1, 1999—Mar. 31, 1999 | 4.5% | 14 | 568 |
Apr. 1, 1999—Jun. 30, 1999 | 5.5% | 16 | 570 |
Jul. 1, 1999—Sep. 30, 1999 | 5.5% | 16 | 570 |
Oct. 1, 1999—Dec. 31, 1999 | 5.5% | 16 | 570 |
Jan. 1, 2000—Mar. 31, 2000 | 5.5% | 64 | 618 |
Apr. 1, 2000—Jun. 30, 2000 | 6.5% | 66 | 620 |
Jul. 1, 2000—Sep. 30, 2000 | 6.5% | 66 | 620 |
Oct. 1, 2000—Dec. 31, 2000 | 6.5% | 66 | 620 |
Jan. 1, 2001—Mar. 31, 2001 | 6.5% | 18 | 572 |
Apr. 1, 2001—Jun. 30, 2001 | 5.5% | 16 | 570 |
Jul. 1, 2001—Sep. 30, 2001 | 4.5% | 14 | 568 |
Oct. 1, 2001—Dec. 31, 2001 | 4.5% | 14 | 568 |
Jan. 1, 2002—Mar. 31, 2002 | 3.5% | 12 | 566 |
Apr. 1, 2002—Jun. 30, 2002 | 3.5% | 12 | 566 |
Jul. 1, 2002—Sep. 30, 2002 | 3.5% | 12 | 566 |
Oct. 1, 2002—Dec. 31, 2002 | 3.5% | 12 | 566 |
Jan. 1, 2003—Mar. 31, 2003 | 2.5% | 10 | 564 |
Apr. 1, 2003—Jun. 30, 2003 | 2.5% | 10 | 564 |
Jul. 1, 2003—Sep. 30, 2003 | 2.5% | 10 | 564 |
Oct. 1, 2003—Dec. 31, 2003 | 1.5% | 8 | 562 |
Jan. 1, 2004—Mar. 31, 2004 | 1.5% | 56 | 610 |
Apr. 1, 2004—Jun. 30, 2004 | 2.5% | 58 | 612 |
Jul. 1, 2004—Sep. 30, 2004 | 1.5% | 56 | 610 |
Oct. 1, 2004—Dec. 31, 2004 | 2.5% | 58 | 612 |
Jan. 1, 2005—Mar. 31, 2005 | 2.5% | 10 | 564 |
Apr. 1, 2005—Jun. 30, 2005 | 3.5% | 12 | 566 |
Jul. 1, 2005—Sep. 30, 2005 | 3.5% | 12 | 566 |
Oct. 1, 2005—Dec. 31, 2005 | 4.5% | 14 | 568 |
Jan. 1, 2006—Mar. 31, 2006 | 4.5% | 14 | 568 |
Apr. 1, 2006—Jun. 30, 2006 | 4.5% | 14 | 568 |
Jul. 1, 2006—Sep. 30, 2006 | 5.5% | 16 | 570 |
Oct. 1, 2006—Dec. 31, 2006 | 5.5% | 16 | 570 |
Jan. 1, 2007—Mar. 31, 2007 | 5.5% | 16 | 570 |
Apr. 1, 2007—Jun. 30, 2007 | 5.5% | 16 | 570 |
This notice provides guidance as to the corporate bond weighted average interest rate and the permissible range of interest rates specified under § 412(b)(5)(B)(ii)(II) of the Internal Revenue Code. In addition, it provides guidance as to the interest rate on 30-year Treasury securities under § 417(e)(3)(A)(ii)(II).
Sections 412(b)(5)(B)(ii) and 412(l)(7)(C)(i), as amended by the Pension Funding Equity Act of 2004 and by the Pension Protection Act of 2006, provide that the interest rates used to calculate current liability and to determine the required contribution under § 412(l) for plan years beginning in 2004 through 2007 must be within a permissible range based on the weighted average of the rates of interest on amounts invested conservatively in long term investment grade corporate bonds during the 4-year period ending on the last day before the beginning of the plan year.
Notice 2004-34, 2004-1 C.B. 848, provides guidelines for determining the corporate bond weighted average interest rate and the resulting permissible range of interest rates used to calculate current liability. That notice establishes that the corporate bond weighted average is based on the monthly composite corporate bond rate derived from designated corporate bond indices. The methodology for determining the monthly composite corporate bond rate as set forth in Notice 2004-34 continues to apply in determining that rate. See Notice 2006-75, 2006-36 I.R.B. 366.
The composite corporate bond rate for February 2007 is 5.85 percent. Pursuant to Notice 2004-34, the Service has determined this rate as the average of the monthly yields for the included corporate bond indices for that month.
The following corporate bond weighted average interest rate was determined for plan years beginning in the month shown below.
For Plan Years Beginning in: | Corporate Bond Weighted Average | 90% to 100% Permissible Range | |
---|---|---|---|
Month | Year | ||
March | 2007 | 5.80 | 5.22 to 5.80 |
Section 417(e)(3)(A)(ii)(II) defines the applicable interest rate, which must be used for purposes of determining the minimum present value of a participant’s benefit under § 417(e)(1) and (2), as the annual rate of interest on 30-year Treasury securities for the month before the date of distribution or such other time as the Secretary may by regulations prescribe. Section 1.417(e)-1(d)(3) of the Income Tax Regulations provides that the applicable interest rate for a month is the annual interest rate on 30-year Treasury securities as specified by the Commissioner for that month in revenue rulings, notices or other guidance published in the Internal Revenue Bulletin.
The rate of interest on 30-year Treasury securities for February 2007 is 4.82 percent. The Service has determined this rate as the average of the yield on the 30-year Treasury bond maturing in February 2036 determined each day through February 7, 2007, and the yield on the 30-year Treasury bond maturing in February 2037 determined each day for the balance of the month.
The principal authors of this notice are Paul Stern and Tony Montanaro of the Employee Plans, Tax Exempt and Government Entities Division. For further information regarding this notice, please contact the Employee Plans’ taxpayer assistance telephone service at 877-829-5500 (a toll-free number), between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m. Eastern time, Monday through Friday. Mr. Stern may be reached at 202-283-9703. Mr. Montanaro may be reached at 202-283-9714. The telephone numbers in the two preceding sentences are not toll-free.
This revenue procedure provides issuers of qualified mortgage bonds, as defined in section 143(a) of the Internal Revenue Code, and issuers of mortgage credit certificates, as defined in section 25(c), with (1) the nationwide average purchase price for residences located in the United States, and (2) average area purchase price safe harbors for residences located in statistical areas in each state, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, the Northern Mariana Islands, American Samoa, the Virgin Islands, and Guam.
.01 Section 103(a) provides that, except as provided in section 103(b), gross income does not include interest on any state or local bond. Section 103(b)(1) provides that section 103(a) shall not apply to any private activity bond that is not a “qualified bond” within the meaning of section 141. Section 141(e) provides, in part, that the term “qualified bond” means any private activity bond if such bond (1) is a qualified mortgage bond under section 143, (2) meets the volume cap requirements under section 146, and (3) meets the applicable requirements under section 147.
.02 Section 143(a)(1) provides that the term “qualified mortgage bond” means a bond that is issued as part of a qualified mortgage issue. Section 143(a)(2)(A) provides that the term “qualified mortgage issue” means an issue of one or more bonds by a state or political subdivision thereof, but only if: (i) all proceeds of the issue (exclusive of issuance costs and a reasonably required reserve) are to be used to finance owner-occupied residences; (ii) the issue meets the requirements of subsections (c), (d), (e), (f), (g), (h), (i), and (m)(7) of section 143; (iii) the issue does not meet the private business tests of paragraphs (1) and (2) of section 141(b); and (iv) with respect to amounts received more than 10 years after the date of issuance, repayments of $250,000 or more of principal on mortgage financing provided by the issue are used by the close of the first semiannual period beginning after the date the prepayment (or complete repayment) is received to redeem bonds that are part of the issue.
.03 Section 143(e)(1) provides that an issue of bonds meets the purchase price requirements of section 143(e) if the acquisition cost of each residence financed by the issue does not exceed 90 percent of the average area purchase price applicable to such residence. Section 143(e)(5) provides that, in the case of a targeted area residence (as defined in section 143(j)), section 143(e)(1) shall be applied by substituting 110 percent for 90 percent.
.04 Section 143(e)(2) provides that the term “average area purchase price” means, with respect to any residence, the average purchase price of single-family residences (in the statistical area in which the residence is located) that were purchased during the most recent 12-month period for which sufficient statistical information is available. Under sections 143(e)(3) and (4), respectively, separate determinations are to be made for new and existing residences, and for two-, three-, and four-family residences.
.05 Section 143(e)(2) provides that the determination of the average area purchase price for a statistical area shall be made as of the date on which the commitment to provide the financing is made or, if earlier, the date of the purchase of the residence.
.06 Section 143(k)(2)(A) provides that the term “statistical area” means (i) a metropolitan statistical area (MSA), and (ii) any county (or the portion thereof) that is not within an MSA. Section 143(k)(2)(C) further provides that if sufficient recent statistical information with respect to a county (or portion thereof) is unavailable, the Secretary may substitute another area for which there is sufficient recent statistical information for such county (or portion thereof). In the case of any portion of a State which is not within a county, section 143(k)(2)(D) provides that the Secretary may designate as a county any area that is the equivalent of a county. Section 6a.103A-1(b)(4)(i) of the Temporary Income Tax Regulations (issued under section 103A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, the predecessor of section 143) provides that the term “State” includes a possession of the United States and the District of Columbia.
.07 Section 6a.103A-2(f)(5)(i) provides that an issuer may rely upon the average area purchase price safe harbors published by the Department of the Treasury for the statistical area in which a residence is located. Section 6a.103A-2(f)(5)(i) further provides that an issuer may use an average area purchase price limitation different from the published safe harbor if the issuer has more accurate and comprehensive data for the statistical area.
.08 Section 25(c) permits a state or political subdivision to establish a qualified mortgage credit certificate program. In general, a qualified mortgage credit certificate program is a program under which the issuing authority elects not to issue an amount of private activity bonds that it may otherwise issue during the calendar year under section 146, and in their place, issues mortgage credit certificates to taxpayers in connection with the acquisition of their principal residences. Section 25(a)(1) provides, in general, that the holder of a mortgage credit certificate may claim a federal income tax credit equal to the product of the credit rate specified in the certificate and the interest paid or accrued during the tax year on the remaining principal of the indebtedness incurred to acquire the residence. Section 25(c)(2)(A)(iii)(III) generally provides that residences acquired in connection with the issuance of mortgage credit certificates must meet the purchase price requirements of section 143(e).
.09 Section 143(f) imposes limitations on the income of mortgagors for whom financing may be provided by qualified mortgage bonds. In addition, section 25(c)(2)(A)(iii)(IV) provides that holders of mortgage credit certificates must meet the income requirement of section 143(f). Generally, under sections 143(f)(1) and 25(c)(2)(A)(iii)(IV), the income requirement is met only if all owner-financing under a qualified mortgage bond and all mortgage credit certificates issued under a qualified mortgage credit certificate program are provided to mortgagors whose family income is 115 percent or less of the applicable median family income. Section 143(f)(5), however, generally provides for an upward adjustment to the percentage limitation in high housing cost areas. High housing cost areas are defined in section 143(f)(5)(C) as any statistical area for which the housing cost/income ratio is greater than 1.2.
.10 Under section 143(f)(5)(D), the housing cost/income ratio with respect to any statistical area is determined by dividing (a) the applicable housing price ratio for such area by (b) the ratio that the area median gross income for such area bears to the median gross income for the United States. The applicable housing price ratio is the new housing price ratio (new housing average area purchase price divided by the new housing average purchase price for the United States) or the existing housing price ratio (existing housing average area purchase price divided by the existing housing average purchase price for the United States), whichever results in the housing cost/income ratio being closer to 1.
.11 Average area purchase price safe harbors for each state, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, the Northern Mariana Islands, American Samoa, the Virgin Islands, and Guam were last published in Rev. Proc. 2006-17, 2006-14 I.R.B. 709.
.12 The nationwide average purchase price limitation was last published in section 4.02 of Rev. Proc. 2006-17. Guidance with respect to the United States and area median gross income figures that are to be used in computing the housing cost/income ratio described in section 143(f)(5) was last published in Rev. Proc. 2006-20, 2006-17 I.R.B. 841.
.13 This revenue procedure uses FHA loan limits for a given statistical area to calculate the average area purchase price safe harbor for that area. FHA sets limits on the dollar value of loans it will insure based on median home prices and conforming loan limits established by the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation. In particular, FHA sets an area’s loan limit at 95 percent of the median home sales price for the area, subject to certain floors and caps measured against conforming loan limits.
.14 To calculate the average area purchase price safe harbors in this revenue procedure, the FHA loan limits are adjusted to take into account the differences between average and median purchase prices. Because FHA loan limits do not differentiate between new and existing residences, this revenue procedure contains a single average area purchase price safe harbor for both new and existing residences in a statistical area. The Treasury Department and the Internal Revenue Service have determined that FHA loan limits provide a reasonable basis for determining average area purchase price safe harbors. If the Treasury Department and the Internal Revenue Service become aware of other sources of average purchase price data, including data that differentiate between new and existing residences, consideration will be given as to whether such data provide a more accurate method for calculating average area purchase price safe harbors.
.15 The average area purchase price safe harbors listed in section 4.01 of this revenue procedure are based on FHA loan limits released January 3, 2007. FHA loan limits are available for statistical areas in each state, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, the Northern Mariana Islands, American Samoa, the Virgin Islands, and Guam. See section 3.03 of this revenue procedure with respect to FHA loan limits revised after January 3, 2007.
.16 OMB Bulletin No. 03-04, dated and effective June 6, 2003, revised the definitions of the nation’s metropolitan areas and recognized 49 new metropolitan statistical areas. The OMB bulletin no longer includes primary metropolitan statistical areas.
.01 Average area purchase price safe harbors for statistical areas in each state, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, the Northern Mariana Islands, American Samoa, the Virgin Islands, and Guam are set forth in section 4.01 of this revenue procedure. Average area purchase price safe harbors are provided for single-family and two to four-family residences. For each type of residence, section 4.01 of this revenue procedure contains a single safe harbor that may be used for both new and existing residences. Issuers of qualified mortgage bonds and issuers of mortgage credit certificates may rely on these safe harbors to satisfy the requirements of sections 143(e) and (f). Section 4.01 of this revenue procedure provides safe harbors for MSAs and for certain counties and county equivalents. If no purchase price safe harbor is available for a statistical area, the safe harbor for “ALL OTHER AREAS” may be used for that statistical area (except for Alaska, for which a separate safe harbor is provided for statistical areas not listed).
.02 If a residence is in an MSA, the safe harbor applicable to it is the limitation of that MSA. If an MSA falls in more than one state, the MSA is listed in section 4.01 of this revenue procedure under each state.
.03 If the FHA revises the FHA loan limit for any statistical area after January 3, 2006, an issuer of qualified mortgage bonds or mortgage credit certificates may use the revised FHA loan limit for that statistical area to compute (as provided in the next sentence) a revised average area purchase price safe harbor for the statistical area provided that the issuer maintains records evidencing the revised FHA loan limit. The revised average area purchase price safe harbor for that statistical area is computed by dividing the revised FHA loan limit by .76.
.04 If, pursuant to section 6a.103A-2(f)(5)(i), an issuer uses more accurate and comprehensive data to determine the average area purchase price for a statistical area, the issuer must make separate average area purchase price determinations for new and existing residences. Moreover, when computing the average area purchase price for a statistical area that is an MSA, as defined in OMB Bulletin No. 03-04, the issuer must make the computation for the entire applicable MSA. When computing the average area purchase price for a statistical area that is not an MSA, the issuer must make the computation for the entire statistical area and may not combine statistical areas. Thus, for example, the issuer may not combine two or more counties.
.05 If an issuer receives a ruling permitting it to rely on an average area purchase price limitation that is higher than the applicable safe harbor in this revenue procedure, the issuer may rely on that higher limitation for the purpose of satisfying the requirements of section 143(e) and (f) for bonds sold, and mortgage credit certificates issued, not more than 30 months following the termination date of the 12-month period used by the issuer to compute the limitation.
.06 Section 4.02 of this revenue procedure sets forth a single nationwide average purchase price for purposes of computing the housing cost/income ratio under section 143(f)(5).
.07 Issuers must use the nationwide average purchase price set forth in section 4.02 of this revenue procedure when computing the housing cost/income ratio under section 143(f)(5) regardless of whether they are relying on the average area purchase price safe harbors contained in this revenue procedure or using more accurate and comprehensive data to determine average area purchase prices for new and existing residences for a statistical area that are different from the published safe harbors in this revenue procedure.
.08 If, pursuant to section 6.02 of this revenue procedure, an issuer relies on the average area purchase price safe harbors contained in Rev. Proc. 2006-17, the issuer must use the nationwide average purchase price set forth in section 4.02 of Rev. Proc. 2006-17 in computing the housing cost/income ratio under section 143(f)(5). Likewise, if, pursuant to section 6.05 of this revenue procedure, an issuer relies on the nationwide average purchase price published in Rev. Proc. 2006-17, the issuer may not rely on the average area purchase price safe harbors published in this revenue procedure.
.01 Average area purchase prices for single-family and two to four-family residences in MSAs, and for certain counties and county equivalents are set forth below. The safe harbor for “ALL OTHER AREAS” (found at the end of the table below) may be used for a statistical area that is not listed below.
STATE | MSA NAME | COUNTY NAME | SAFE HARBOR AVERAGE PRICE | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 LIVING UNIT | 2 LIVING UNITS | 3 LIVING UNITS | 4 LIVING UNITS | |||
AK | ANCHORAGE, AK (MSA) | ANCHORAGE | $335,592 | $377,982 | $459,276 | $529,934 |
NON-METRO | DENALI | $316,137 | $404,668 | $489,126 | $607,879 | |
JUNEAU, AK (MICRO) | JUNEAU | $398,750 | $449,118 | $545,658 | $629,605 | |
ANCHORAGE, AK (MSA) | MATANUSKA-SUSIT | $335,592 | $377,982 | $459,276 | $529,934 | |
NON-METRO | SITKA | $431,250 | $485,724 | $590,132 | $680,921 | |
NON-METRO | YAKUTAT CITY | $316,137 | $404,668 | $489,126 | $607,879 | |
AZ | FLAGSTAFF, AZ (MSA) | COCONINO | $437,500 | $492,763 | $598,684 | $690,789 |
PAYSON, AZ (MICRO) | GILA | $293,750 | $337,168 | $407,558 | $506,495 | |
PHOENIX-MESA-SCOTTSDALE, AZ (MSA) | MARICOPA | $346,250 | $389,987 | $473,816 | $546,711 | |
LAKE HAVASU CITY-KINGMAN, AZ (MICRO) | MOHAVE | $321,842 | $362,500 | $440,461 | $508,224 | |
NON-METRO | NAVAJO | $265,000 | $337,168 | $407,558 | $506,495 | |
TUCSON, AZ (MSA) | PIMA | $315,592 | $355,461 | $431,908 | $506,495 | |
PHOENIX-MESA-SCOTTSDALE, AZ (MSA) | PINAL | $346,250 | $389,987 | $473,816 | $546,711 | |
PRESCOTT, AZ (MSA) | YAVAPAI | $375,000 | $422,368 | $513,158 | $592,105 | |
CA | OAKLAND-FREMONT-HAYWARD, CA METROPOLITAN | ALAMEDA | $477,355 | $611,117 | $738,699 | $918,021 |
NON-METRO | ALPINE | $477,355 | $611,117 | $738,699 | $918,021 | |
NON-METRO | AMADOR | $443,750 | $506,842 | $615,789 | $710,526 | |
CHICO, CA (MSA) | BUTTE | $400,000 | $450,526 | $547,368 | $631,579 | |
NON-METRO | CALAVERAS | $477,355 | $550,461 | $668,816 | $774,671 | |
NON-METRO | COLUSA | $381,250 | $429,408 | $521,711 | $601,974 | |
OAKLAND-FREMONT-HAYWARD, CA METROPOLITAN | CONTRA COSTA | $477,355 | $611,117 | $738,699 | $918,021 | |
CRESCENT CITY, CA (MICRO) | DEL NORTE | $311,250 | $350,566 | $425,921 | $506,495 | |
SACRAMENTO-ARDEN-ARCADE-ROSEVILLE, CA | EL DORADO | $477,355 | $587,092 | $713,289 | $823,026 | |
FRESNO, CA (MSA) | FRESNO | $381,250 | $429,408 | $521,711 | $601,974 | |
NON-METRO | GLENN | $283,750 | $337,168 | $407,558 | $506,495 | |
EUREKA-ARCATA-FORTUNA, CA (MICRO) | HUMBOLDT | $393,750 | $443,487 | $538,816 | $621,711 | |
EL CENTRO, CA (MSA) | IMPERIAL | $274,934 | $337,168 | $407,558 | $506,495 | |
BISHOP, CA (MICRO) | INYO | $477,355 | $542,039 | $658,553 | $759,868 | |
BAKERSFIELD, CA (MSA) | KERN | $368,750 | $415,329 | $504,605 | $582,237 | |
HANFORD-CORCORAN, CA (MSA) | KINGS | $312,316 | $351,766 | $427,379 | $506,495 | |
CLEARLAKE, CA (MICRO) | LAKE | $401,250 | $451,934 | $549,079 | $633,553 | |
LOS ANGELES-LONG BEACH-GLENDALE, CA METROPOLITAN | LOS ANGELES | $477,355 | $611,117 | $738,699 | $918,021 | |
MADERA, CA (MSA) | MADERA | $425,000 | $478,684 | $581,579 | $671,053 | |
SAN FRANCISCO-SAN MATEO-REDWOOD CITY, CA | MARIN | $477,355 | $611,117 | $738,699 | $918,021 | |
NON-METRO | MARIPOSA | $411,704 | $464,605 | $564,474 | $651,316 | |
UKIAH, CA (MICRO) | MENDOCINO | $477,355 | $563,158 | $684,211 | $789,474 | |
MERCED, CA (MSA) | MERCED | $471,557 | $531,122 | $645,288 | $744,564 | |
NON-METRO | MONO | $477,355 | $611,117 | $738,699 | $918,021 | |
SALINAS, CA (MSA) | MONTEREY | $477,355 | $611,117 | $738,699 | $918,021 | |
NAPA, CA (MSA) | NAPA | $477,355 | $611,117 | $738,699 | $918,021 | |
TRUCKEE-GRASS VALLEY, CA (MICRO) | NEVADA | $477,355 | $611,117 | $738,699 | $918,021 | |
SANTA ANA-ANAHEIM-IRVINE, CA METROPOLITAN | ORANGE | $477,355 | $611,117 | $738,699 | $918,021 | |
SACRAMENTO-ARDEN-ARCADE-ROSEVILLE, CA | PLACER | $477,355 | $587,092 | $713,289 | $823,026 | |
NON-METRO | PLUMAS | $410,000 | $461,789 | $561,053 | $647,368 | |
RIVERSIDE-SAN BERNARDINO-ONTARIO, CA (MSA) | RIVERSIDE | $477,355 | $561,711 | $682,500 | $787,500 | |
SACRAMENTO-ARDEN-ARCADE-ROSEVILLE, CA | SACRAMENTO | $477,355 | $587,092 | $713,289 | $823,026 | |
SAN JOSE-SUNNYVALE-SANTA CLARA, CA (MSA) | SAN BENITO | $477,355 | $611,117 | $738,699 | $918,021 | |
RIVERSIDE-SAN BERNARDINO-ONTARIO, CA (MSA) | SAN BERNARDINO | $477,355 | $561,711 | $682,500 | $787,500 | |
SAN DIEGO-CARLSBAD-SAN MARCOS, CA (MSA) | SAN DIEGO | $477,355 | $611,117 | $738,699 | $918,021 | |
SAN FRANCISCO-SAN MATEO-REDWOOD CITY, CA | SAN FRANCISCO | $477,355 | $611,117 | $738,699 | $918,021 | |
STOCKTON, CA (MSA) | SAN JOAQUIN | $477,355 | $549,079 | $667,105 | $769,737 | |
SAN LUIS OBISPO-PASO ROBLES, CA (MSA) | SAN LUIS OBISPO | $477,355 | $611,117 | $738,699 | $918,021 | |
SAN FRANCISCO-SAN MATEO-REDWOOD CITY, CA | SAN MATEO | $477,355 | $611,117 | $738,699 | $918,021 | |
SANTA BARBARA-SANTA MARIA, CA (MSA) | SANTA BARBARA | $477,355 | $611,117 | $738,699 | $918,021 | |
SAN JOSE-SUNNYVALE-SANTA CLARA, CA (MSA) | SANTA CLARA | $477,355 | $611,117 | $738,699 | $918,021 | |
SANTA CRUZ-WATSONVILLE, CA (MSA) | SANTA CRUZ | $477,355 | $611,117 | $738,699 | $918,021 | |
REDDING, CA (MSA) | SHASTA | $423,625 | $477,136 | $579,697 | $668,882 | |
NON-METRO | SISKIYOU | $293,750 | $337,168 | $407,558 | $506,495 | |
VALLEJO-FAIRFIELD, CA (MSA) | SOLANO | $477,355 | $611,117 | $738,699 | $907,895 | |
SANTA ROSA-PETALUMA, CA (MSA) | SONOMA | $477,355 | $611,117 | $738,699 | $918,021 | |
MODESTO, CA (MSA) | STANISLAUS | $477,355 | $537,653 | $653,222 | $753,718 | |
YUBA CITY, CA (MSA) | SUTTER | $424,680 | $478,325 | $581,142 | $670,549 | |
RED BLUFF, CA (MICRO) | TEHAMA | $293,750 | $337,168 | $407,558 | $506,495 | |
VISALIA-PORTERVILLE, CA (MSA) | TULARE | $325,000 | $366,053 | $444,737 | $513,158 | |
PHOENIX LAKE-CEDAR RIDGE, CA (MICRO) | TUOLUMNE | $437,500 | $492,763 | $598,684 | $690,789 | |
OXNARD-THOUSAND OAKS-VENTURA, CA (MSA) | VENTURA | $477,355 | $611,117 | $738,699 | $918,021 | |
SACRAMENTO-ARDEN-ARCADE-ROSEVILLE, CA | YOLO | $477,355 | $587,092 | $713,289 | $823,026 | |
YUBA CITY, CA (MSA) | YUBA | $424,680 | $478,325 | $581,142 | $670,549 | |
CO | DENVER-AURORA, CO (MSA) | ADAMS | $405,750 | $457,003 | $555,237 | $640,658 |
DENVER-AURORA, CO (MSA) | ARAPAHOE | $405,750 | $457,003 | $555,237 | $640,658 | |
NON-METRO | ARCHULETA | $263,487 | $337,168 | $407,558 | $506,495 | |
BOULDER, CO (MSA) | BOULDER | $458,500 | $516,416 | $627,421 | $723,947 | |
DENVER-AURORA, CO (MSA) | BROOMFIELD | $405,750 | $457,003 | $555,237 | $640,658 | |
DENVER-AURORA, CO (MSA) | CLEAR CREEK | $405,750 | $457,003 | $555,237 | $640,658 | |
DENVER-AURORA, CO (MSA) | DENVER | $405,750 | $457,003 | $555,237 | $640,658 | |
DENVER-AURORA, CO (MSA) | DOUGLAS | $405,750 | $457,003 | $555,237 | $640,658 | |
EDWARDS, CO (MICRO) | EAGLE | $477,355 | $537,653 | $653,222 | $753,718 | |
COLORADO SPRINGS, CO (MSA) | EL PASO | $325,000 | $366,053 | $444,737 | $513,158 | |
DENVER-AURORA, CO (MSA) | ELBERT | $405,750 | $457,003 | $555,237 | $640,658 | |
NON-METRO | GARFIELD | $393,209 | $442,878 | $538,075 | $620,857 | |
DENVER-AURORA, CO (MSA) | GILPIN | $405,750 | $457,003 | $555,237 | $640,658 | |
NON-METRO | GRAND | $293,750 | $337,168 | $407,558 | $506,495 | |
DENVER-AURORA, CO (MSA) | JEFFERSON | $405,750 | $457,003 | $555,237 | $640,658 | |
DURANGO, CO (MICRO) | LA PLATA | $303,750 | $342,118 | $415,658 | $506,495 | |
EDWARDS, CO (MICRO) | LAKE | $477,355 | $537,653 | $653,222 | $753,718 | |
FORT COLLINS-LOVELAND, CO (MSA) | LARIMER | $312,500 | $351,974 | $427,632 | $506,495 | |
DENVER-AURORA, CO (MSA) | PARK | $405,750 | $457,003 | $555,237 | $640,658 | |
NON-METRO | PITKIN | $381,999 | $488,975 | $591,028 | $734,521 | |
NON-METRO | ROUTT | $398,026 | $448,303 | $544,667 | $628,462 | |
NON-METRO | SAN MIGUEL | $477,355 | $611,117 | $738,699 | $918,021 | |
SILVERTHORNE, CO (MICRO) | SUMMIT | $431,250 | $485,724 | $590,132 | $680,921 | |
COLORADO SPRINGS, CO (MSA) | TELLER | $325,000 | $366,053 | $444,737 | $513,158 | |
GREELEY, CO (MSA) | WELD | $361,250 | $406,882 | $494,342 | $570,395 | |
CT | BRIDGEPORT-STAMFORD-NORWALK, CT (MSA) | FAIRFIELD | $477,355 | $611,117 | $738,699 | $918,021 |
HARTFORD-WEST HARTFORD-EAST HARTFORD, CT | HARTFORD | $439,125 | $494,593 | $600,908 | $693,355 | |
TORRINGTON, CT (MICRO) | LITCHFIELD | $375,000 | $422,368 | $513,158 | $592,105 | |
HARTFORD-WEST HARTFORD-EAST HARTFORD, CT | MIDDLESEX | $439,125 | $494,593 | $600,908 | $693,355 | |
NEW HAVEN-MILFORD, CT (MSA) | NEW HAVEN | $385,625 | $435,039 | $528,553 | $609,868 | |
NORWICH-NEW LONDON, CT (MSA) | NEW LONDON | $398,750 | $449,118 | $545,658 | $629,605 | |
HARTFORD-WEST HARTFORD-EAST HARTFORD, CT | TOLLAND | $439,125 | $494,593 | $600,908 | $693,355 | |
DC | WASHINGTON-ARLINGTON-ALEXANDRIA, DC-VA-MD | DISTRICT OF COL | $477,355 | $611,117 | $738,699 | $888,158 |
DE | DOVER, DE (MSA) | KENT | $350,395 | $394,655 | $479,487 | $553,255 |
WILMINGTON, DE-MD-NJ METROPOLITAN DIVISION | NEW CASTLE | $385,112 | $433,758 | $526,996 | $608,072 | |
SEAFORD, DE (MICRO) | SUSSEX | $325,000 | $366,053 | $444,737 | $513,158 | |
FL | GAINESVILLE, FL (MSA) | ALACHUA | $269,000 | $337,168 | $407,558 | $506,495 |
JACKSONVILLE, FL (MSA) | BAKER | $387,500 | $436,447 | $530,263 | $611,842 | |
PANAMA CITY-LYNN HAVEN, FL (MSA) | BAY | $331,250 | $373,092 | $453,289 | $523,026 | |
PALM BAY-MELBOURNE-TITUSVILLE, FL (MSA) | BREVARD | $291,250 | $337,168 | $407,558 | $506,495 | |
FORT LAUDERDALE-POMPANO BEACH-DEERFIELD | BROWARD | $477,355 | $544,336 | $661,343 | $763,088 | |
PUNTA GORDA, FL (MSA) | CHARLOTTE | $295,012 | $337,168 | $407,558 | $506,495 | |
JACKSONVILLE, FL (MSA) | CLAY | $387,500 | $436,447 | $530,263 | $611,842 | |
NAPLES-MARCO ISLAND, FL (MSA) | COLLIER | $477,355 | $563,017 | $684,039 | $789,276 | |
JACKSONVILLE, FL (MSA) | DUVAL | $387,500 | $436,447 | $530,263 | $611,842 | |
PALM COAST, FL (MICRO) | FLAGLER | $287,500 | $337,168 | $407,558 | $506,495 | |
GAINESVILLE, FL (MSA) | GILCHRIST | $269,000 | $337,168 | $407,558 | $506,495 | |
TAMPA-ST. PETERSBURG-CLEARWATER, FL (MSA) | HERNANDO | $292,500 | $337,168 | $407,558 | $506,495 | |
TAMPA-ST. PETERSBURG-CLEARWATER, FL (MSA) | HILLSBOROUGH | $292,500 | $337,168 | $407,558 | $506,495 | |
SEBASTIAN-VERO BEACH, FL (MSA) | INDIAN RIVER | $281,250 | $337,168 | $407,558 | $506,495 | |
ORLANDO-KISSIMMEE, FL (MSA) | LAKE | $338,750 | $381,539 | $463,553 | $534,868 | |
CAPE CORAL-FORT MYERS, FL (MSA) | LEE | $356,250 | $401,250 | $487,500 | $562,500 | |
SARASOTA-BRADENTON-VENICE, FL (MSA) | MANATEE | $442,237 | $498,097 | $605,166 | $698,268 | |
PORT ST. LUCIE-FORT PIERCE, FL (MSA) | MARTIN | $364,000 | $409,979 | $498,105 | $574,737 | |
MIAMI-MIAMI BEACH-KENDALL, FL METROPOLITAN | MIAMI-DADE | $477,355 | $544,336 | $661,343 | $763,088 | |
KEY WEST-MARATHON, FL (MICRO) | MONROE | $477,355 | $611,117 | $738,699 | $918,021 | |
JACKSONVILLE, FL (MSA) | NASSAU | $387,500 | $436,447 | $530,263 | $611,842 | |
FORT WALTON BEACH-CRESTVIEW-DESTIN, FL (MSA) | OKALOOSA | $312,375 | $351,833 | $427,461 | $506,495 | |
ORLANDO-KISSIMMEE, FL (MSA) | ORANGE | $338,750 | $381,539 | $463,553 | $534,868 | |
ORLANDO-KISSIMMEE, FL (MSA) | OSCEOLA | $338,750 | $381,539 | $463,553 | $534,868 | |
WEST PALM BEACH-BOCA RATON-BOYNTON BEACH | PALM BEACH | $477,355 | $544,336 | $661,343 | $763,088 | |
TAMPA-ST. PETERSBURG-CLEARWATER, FL (MSA) | PASCO | $292,500 | $337,168 | $407,558 | $506,495 | |
TAMPA-ST. PETERSBURG-CLEARWATER, FL (MSA) | PINELLAS | $292,500 | $337,168 | $407,558 | $506,495 | |
LAKELAND, FL (MSA) | POLK | $270,000 | $337,168 | $407,558 | $506,495 | |
SARASOTA-BRADENTON-VENICE, FL (MSA) | SARASOTA | $442,237 | $498,097 | $605,166 | $698,268 | |
ORLANDO-KISSIMMEE, FL (MSA) | SEMINOLE | $338,750 | $381,539 | $463,553 | $534,868 | |
JACKSONVILLE, FL (MSA) | ST. JOHNS | $387,500 | $436,447 | $530,263 | $611,842 | |
PORT ST. LUCIE-FORT PIERCE, FL (MSA) | ST. LUCIE | $364,000 | $409,979 | $498,105 | $574,737 | |
DELTONA-DAYTONA BEACH-ORMOND BEACH, FL (MSA) | VOLUSIA | $302,864 | $341,121 | $414,446 | $506,495 | |
NON-METRO | WALTON | $477,355 | $538,520 | $654,276 | $791,700 | |
GA | ATLANTA-SANDY SPRINGS-MARIETTA, GA (MSA) | BARROW | $332,750 | $374,782 | $455,342 | $525,395 |
ATLANTA-SANDY SPRINGS-MARIETTA, GA (MSA) | BARTOW | $332,750 | $374,782 | $455,342 | $525,395 | |
BRUNSWICK, GA (MSA) | BRANTLEY | $275,921 | $337,168 | $407,558 | $506,495 | |
ATLANTA-SANDY SPRINGS-MARIETTA, GA (MSA) | BUTTS | $332,750 | $374,782 | $455,342 | $525,395 | |
ATLANTA-SANDY SPRINGS-MARIETTA, GA (MSA) | CARROLL | $332,750 | $374,782 | $455,342 | $525,395 | |
ATLANTA-SANDY SPRINGS-MARIETTA, GA (MSA) | CHEROKEE | $332,750 | $374,782 | $455,342 | $525,395 | |
ATLANTA-SANDY SPRINGS-MARIETTA, GA (MSA) | CLAYTON | $332,750 | $374,782 | $455,342 | $525,395 | |
ATLANTA-SANDY SPRINGS-MARIETTA, GA (MSA) | COBB | $332,750 | $374,782 | $455,342 | $525,395 | |
ATLANTA-SANDY SPRINGS-MARIETTA, GA (MSA) | COWETA | $332,750 | $374,782 | $455,342 | $525,395 | |
ATLANTA-SANDY SPRINGS-MARIETTA, GA (MSA) | DAWSON | $332,750 | $374,782 | $455,342 | $525,395 | |
ATLANTA-SANDY SPRINGS-MARIETTA, GA (MSA) | DEKALB | $332,750 | $374,782 | $455,342 | $525,395 | |
ATLANTA-SANDY SPRINGS-MARIETTA, GA (MSA) | DOUGLAS | $332,750 | $374,782 | $455,342 | $525,395 | |
ATLANTA-SANDY SPRINGS-MARIETTA, GA (MSA) | FAYETTE | $332,750 | $374,782 | $455,342 | $525,395 | |
ATLANTA-SANDY SPRINGS-MARIETTA, GA (MSA) | FORSYTH | $332,750 | $374,782 | $455,342 | $525,395 | |
ATLANTA-SANDY SPRINGS-MARIETTA, GA (MSA) | FULTON | $332,750 | $374,782 | $455,342 | $525,395 | |
BRUNSWICK, GA (MSA) | GLYNN | $275,921 | $337,168 | $407,558 | $506,495 | |
ATLANTA-SANDY SPRINGS-MARIETTA, GA (MSA) | GWINNETT | $332,750 | $374,782 | $455,342 | $525,395 | |
ATLANTA-SANDY SPRINGS-MARIETTA, GA (MSA) | HARALSON | $332,750 | $374,782 | $455,342 | $525,395 | |
ATLANTA-SANDY SPRINGS-MARIETTA, GA (MSA) | HEARD | $332,750 | $374,782 | $455,342 | $525,395 | |
ATLANTA-SANDY SPRINGS-MARIETTA, GA (MSA) | HENRY | $332,750 | $374,782 | $455,342 | $525,395 | |
ATLANTA-SANDY SPRINGS-MARIETTA, GA (MSA) | JASPER | $332,750 | $374,782 | $455,342 | $525,395 | |
ATLANTA-SANDY SPRINGS-MARIETTA, GA (MSA) | LAMAR | $332,750 | $374,782 | $455,342 | $525,395 | |
BRUNSWICK, GA (MSA) | MCINTOSH | $275,921 | $337,168 | $407,558 | $506,495 | |
ATLANTA-SANDY SPRINGS-MARIETTA, GA (MSA) | MERIWETHER | $332,750 | $374,782 | $455,342 | $525,395 | |
ATLANTA-SANDY SPRINGS-MARIETTA, GA (MSA) | NEWTON | $332,750 | $374,782 | $455,342 | $525,395 | |
ATLANTA-SANDY SPRINGS-MARIETTA, GA (MSA) | PAULDING | $332,750 | $374,782 | $455,342 | $525,395 | |
ATLANTA-SANDY SPRINGS-MARIETTA, GA (MSA) | PICKENS | $332,750 | $374,782 | $455,342 | $525,395 | |
ATLANTA-SANDY SPRINGS-MARIETTA, GA (MSA) | PIKE | $332,750 | $374,782 | $455,342 | $525,395 | |
ATLANTA-SANDY SPRINGS-MARIETTA, GA (MSA) | ROCKDALE | $332,750 | $374,782 | $455,342 | $525,395 | |
ATLANTA-SANDY SPRINGS-MARIETTA, GA (MSA) | SPALDING | $332,750 | $374,782 | $455,342 | $525,395 | |
ATLANTA-SANDY SPRINGS-MARIETTA, GA (MSA) | WALTON | $332,750 | $374,782 | $455,342 | $525,395 | |
HI | HILO, HI (MICRO) | HAWAII | $593,750 | $668,750 | $812,500 | $937,500 |
HONOLULU, HI (MSA) | HONOLULU | $716,033 | $865,929 | $1,052,063 | $1,213,918 | |
KAPAA, HI (MICRO) | KAUAI | $716,033 | $851,776 | $1,034,868 | $1,194,079 | |
KAHULUI-WAILUKU, HI (MICRO) | MAUI | $716,033 | $840,461 | $1,021,184 | $1,178,289 | |
ID | BOISE CITY-NAMPA, ID (MSA) | ADA | $296,250 | $337,168 | $407,558 | $506,495 |
NON-METRO | BLAINE | $477,355 | $584,276 | $709,868 | $819,079 | |
BOISE CITY-NAMPA, ID (MSA) | BOISE | $296,250 | $337,168 | $407,558 | $506,495 | |
BOISE CITY-NAMPA, ID (MSA) | CANYON | $296,250 | $337,168 | $407,558 | $506,495 | |
BOISE CITY-NAMPA, ID (MSA) | GEM | $296,250 | $337,168 | $407,558 | $506,495 | |
COEUR D’ALENE, ID (MSA) | KOOTENAI | $286,250 | $337,168 | $407,558 | $506,495 | |
BOISE CITY-NAMPA, ID (MSA) | OWYHEE | $296,250 | $337,168 | $407,558 | $506,495 | |
JACKSON, WY-ID (MICRO) | TETON | $477,355 | $611,117 | $738,699 | $918,021 | |
NON-METRO | VALLEY | $416,842 | $469,495 | $570,461 | $658,224 | |
IL | ST. LOUIS, MO-IL (MSA) | BOND | $281,250 | $337,168 | $407,558 | $506,495 |
ST. LOUIS, MO-IL (MSA) | CALHOUN | $281,250 | $337,168 | $407,558 | $506,495 | |
ST. LOUIS, MO-IL (MSA) | CLINTON | $281,250 | $337,168 | $407,558 | $506,495 | |
CHICAGO-NAPERVILLE-JOLIET, IL METROPOLITAN | COOK | $362,105 | $407,845 | $495,512 | $571,745 | |
CHICAGO-NAPERVILLE-JOLIET, IL METROPOLITAN | DEKALB | $362,105 | $407,845 | $495,512 | $571,745 | |
CHICAGO-NAPERVILLE-JOLIET, IL METROPOLITAN | DUPAGE | $362,105 | $407,845 | $495,512 | $571,745 | |
CHICAGO-NAPERVILLE-JOLIET, IL METROPOLITAN | GRUNDY | $362,105 | $407,845 | $495,512 | $571,745 | |
ST. LOUIS, MO-IL (MSA) | JERSEY | $281,250 | $337,168 | $407,558 | $506,495 | |
CHICAGO-NAPERVILLE-JOLIET, IL METROPOLITAN | KANE | $362,105 | $407,845 | $495,512 | $571,745 | |
CHICAGO-NAPERVILLE-JOLIET, IL METROPOLITAN | KENDALL | $362,105 | $407,845 | $495,512 | $571,745 | |
LAKE COUNTY-KENOSHA COUNTY, IL-WI METROP | LAKE | $362,105 | $407,845 | $495,512 | $571,745 | |
ST. LOUIS, MO-IL (MSA) | MACOUPIN | $281,250 | $337,168 | $407,558 | $506,495 | |
ST. LOUIS, MO-IL (MSA) | MADISON | $281,250 | $337,168 | $407,558 | $506,495 | |
CHICAGO-NAPERVILLE-JOLIET, IL METROPOLITAN | MCHENRY | $362,105 | $407,845 | $495,512 | $571,745 | |
ST. LOUIS, MO-IL (MSA) | MONROE | $281,250 | $337,168 | $407,558 | $506,495 | |
ST. LOUIS, MO-IL (MSA) | ST. CLAIR | $281,250 | $337,168 | $407,558 | $506,495 | |
CHICAGO-NAPERVILLE-JOLIET, IL METROPOLITAN | WILL | $362,105 | $407,845 | $495,512 | $571,745 | |
IN | LOUISVILLE-JEFFERON COUNTY, KY-IN (MSA) | CLARK | $281,125 | $337,168 | $407,558 | $506,495 |
CINCINNATI-MIDDLETOWN, OH-KY-IN (MSA) | DEARBORN | $332,500 | $374,500 | $455,000 | $525,000 | |
LOUISVILLE-JEFFERON COUNTY, KY-IN (MSA) | FLOYD | $281,125 | $337,168 | $407,558 | $506,495 | |
CINCINNATI-MIDDLETOWN, OH-KY-IN (MSA) | FRANKLIN | $332,500 | $374,500 | $455,000 | $525,000 | |
LOUISVILLE-JEFFERON COUNTY, KY-IN (MSA) | HARRISON | $281,125 | $337,168 | $407,558 | $506,495 | |
GARY, IN METROPOLITAN DIVISION | JASPER | $362,105 | $407,845 | $495,512 | $571,745 | |
GARY, IN METROPOLITAN DIVISION | LAKE | $362,105 | $407,845 | $495,512 | $571,745 | |
GARY, IN METROPOLITAN DIVISION | NEWTON | $362,105 | $407,845 | $495,512 | $571,745 | |
CINCINNATI-MIDDLETOWN, OH-KY-IN (MSA) | OHIO | $332,500 | $374,500 | $455,000 | $525,000 | |
GARY, IN METROPOLITAN DIVISION | PORTER | $362,105 | $407,845 | $495,512 | $571,745 | |
LOUISVILLE-JEFFERON COUNTY, KY-IN (MSA) | WASHINGTON | $281,125 | $337,168 | $407,558 | $506,495 | |
KS | KANSAS CITY, MO-KS (MSA) | FRANKLIN | $268,750 | $337,168 | $407,558 | $506,495 |
KANSAS CITY, MO-KS (MSA) | JOHNSON | $268,750 | $337,168 | $407,558 | $506,495 | |
KANSAS CITY, MO-KS (MSA) | LEAVENWORTH | $268,750 | $337,168 | $407,558 | $506,495 | |
KANSAS CITY, MO-KS (MSA) | LINN | $268,750 | $337,168 | $407,558 | $506,495 | |
KANSAS CITY, MO-KS (MSA) | MIAMI | $268,750 | $337,168 | $407,558 | $506,495 | |
KANSAS CITY, MO-KS (MSA) | WYANDOTTE | $268,750 | $337,168 | $407,558 | $506,495 | |
KY | CINCINNATI-MIDDLETOWN, OH-KY-IN (MSA) | BOONE | $332,500 | $374,500 | $455,000 | $525,000 |
CINCINNATI-MIDDLETOWN, OH-KY-IN (MSA) | BRACKEN | $332,500 | $374,500 | $455,000 | $525,000 | |
LOUISVILLE-JEFFERON COUNTY, KY-IN (MSA) | BULLITT | $281,125 | $337,168 | $407,558 | $506,495 | |
CINCINNATI-MIDDLETOWN, OH-KY-IN (MSA) | CAMPBELL | $332,500 | $374,500 | $455,000 | $525,000 | |
CINCINNATI-MIDDLETOWN, OH-KY-IN (MSA) | GALLATIN | $332,500 | $374,500 | $455,000 | $525,000 | |
CINCINNATI-MIDDLETOWN, OH-KY-IN (MSA) | GRANT | $332,500 | $374,500 | $455,000 | $525,000 | |
LOUISVILLE-JEFFERON COUNTY, KY-IN (MSA) | HENRY | $281,125 | $337,168 | $407,558 | $506,495 | |
LOUISVILLE-JEFFERON COUNTY, KY-IN (MSA) | JEFFERSON | $281,125 | $337,168 | $407,558 | $506,495 | |
CINCINNATI-MIDDLETOWN, OH-KY-IN (MSA) | KENTON | $332,500 | $374,500 | $455,000 | $525,000 | |
LOUISVILLE-JEFFERON COUNTY, KY-IN (MSA) | MEADE | $281,125 | $337,168 | $407,558 | $506,495 | |
LOUISVILLE-JEFFERON COUNTY, KY-IN (MSA) | NELSON | $281,125 | $337,168 | $407,558 | $506,495 | |
LOUISVILLE-JEFFERON COUNTY, KY-IN (MSA) | OLDHAM | $281,125 | $337,168 | $407,558 | $506,495 | |
CINCINNATI-MIDDLETOWN, OH-KY-IN (MSA) | PENDLETON | $332,500 | $374,500 | $455,000 | $525,000 | |
LOUISVILLE-JEFFERON COUNTY, KY-IN (MSA) | SHELBY | $281,125 | $337,168 | $407,558 | $506,495 | |
LOUISVILLE-JEFFERON COUNTY, KY-IN (MSA) | SPENCER | $281,125 | $337,168 | $407,558 | $506,495 | |
LOUISVILLE-JEFFERON COUNTY, KY-IN (MSA) | TRIMBLE | $281,125 | $337,168 | $407,558 | $506,495 | |
MA | BARNSTABLE TOWN, MA (MSA) | BARNSTABLE | $477,355 | $577,237 | $701,316 | $809,211 |
PROVIDENCE-NEW BEDFORD-FALL RIVER, RI-MA | BRISTOL | $416,250 | $472,891 | $571,567 | $710,309 | |
NON-METRO | DUKES | $477,355 | $611,117 | $738,699 | $918,021 | |
ESSEX COUNTY, MA METROPOLITAN DIVISION | ESSEX | $477,355 | $606,728 | $737,146 | $850,554 | |
SPRINGFIELD, MA (MSA) | FRANKLIN | $273,500 | $337,168 | $407,558 | $506,495 | |
SPRINGFIELD, MA (MSA) | HAMPDEN | $273,500 | $337,168 | $407,558 | $506,495 | |
SPRINGFIELD, MA (MSA) | HAMPSHIRE | $273,500 | $337,168 | $407,558 | $506,495 | |
CAMBRIDGE-NEWTON-FRAMINGHAM, MA METROPOLITAN | MIDDLESEX | $477,355 | $606,728 | $737,146 | $850,554 | |
NON-METRO | NANTUCKET | $477,355 | $611,117 | $738,699 | $918,021 | |
BOSTON-QUINCY, MA METROPOLITAN DIVISION | NORFOLK | $477,355 | $606,728 | $737,146 | $850,554 | |
BOSTON-QUINCY, MA METROPOLITAN DIVISION | PLYMOUTH | $477,355 | $606,728 | $737,146 | $850,554 | |
BOSTON-QUINCY, MA METROPOLITAN DIVISION | SUFFOLK | $477,355 | $606,728 | $737,146 | $850,554 | |
WORCESTER, MA (MSA) | WORCESTER | $385,000 | $488,975 | $591,028 | $734,521 | |
MD | BALTIMORE-TOWSON, MD (MSA) | ANNE ARUNDEL | $477,355 | $537,653 | $653,222 | $753,718 |
BALTIMORE-TOWSON, MD (MSA) | BALTIMORE | $477,355 | $537,653 | $653,222 | $753,718 | |
BALTIMORE-TOWSON, MD (MSA) | BALTIMORE CITY | $477,355 | $537,653 | $653,222 | $753,718 | |
WASHINGTON-ARLINGTON-ALEXANDRIA, DC-VA-METROPOLITAN | CALVERT | $477,355 | $611,117 | $738,699 | $888,158 | |
BALTIMORE-TOWSON, MD (MSA) | CARROLL | $477,355 | $537,653 | $653,222 | $753,718 | |
WILMINGTON, DE-MD-NJ METROPOLITAN DIVISION | CECIL | $385,112 | $433,758 | $526,996 | $608,072 | |
WASHINGTON-ARLINGTON-ALEXANDRIA, DC-VA-METROPOLITAN | CHARLES | $477,355 | $611,117 | $738,699 | $888,158 | |
BETHESDA-GAITHERSBURG-FREDERICK, MD METROPOLITAN | FREDERICK | $477,355 | $611,117 | $738,699 | $888,158 | |
NON-METRO | GARRETT | $437,500 | $492,763 | $598,684 | $690,789 | |
BALTIMORE-TOWSON, MD (MSA) | HARFORD | $477,355 | $537,653 | $653,222 | $753,718 | |
BALTIMORE-TOWSON, MD (MSA) | HOWARD | $477,355 | $537,653 | $653,222 | $753,718 | |
NON-METRO | KENT | $327,089 | $368,405 | $447,596 | $516,457 | |
BETHESDA-GAITHERSBURG-FREDERICK, MD METROPOLITAN | MONTGOMERY | $477,355 | $611,117 | $738,699 | $888,158 | |
WASHINGTON-ARLINGTON-ALEXANDRIA, DC-VA-METROPOLITAN | PRINCE GEORGE’S | $477,355 | $611,117 | $738,699 | $888,158 | |
BALTIMORE-TOWSON, MD (MSA) | QUEEN ANNE’S | $477,355 | $537,653 | $653,222 | $753,718 | |
SALISBURY, MD (MSA) | SOMERSET | $296,250 | $337,168 | $407,558 | $506,495 | |
LEXINGTON PARK, MD (MICRO) | ST. MARY’S | $371,053 | $417,922 | $507,755 | $585,872 | |
EASTON, MD (MICRO) | TALBOT | $371,250 | $418,145 | $508,026 | $599,342 | |
HAGERSTOWN-MARTINSBURG, MD-WV (MSA) | WASHINGTON | $362,500 | $408,289 | $496,053 | $572,368 | |
SALISBURY, MD (MSA) | WICOMICO | $296,250 | $337,168 | $407,558 | $506,495 | |
OCEAN PINES, MD (MICRO) | WORCESTER | $437,499 | $492,761 | $598,682 | $690,787 | |
ME | PORTLAND-SOUTH PORTLAND-BIDDEFORD, ME (MSA) | CUMBERLAND | $336,875 | $379,428 | $460,987 | $531,908 |
NON-METRO | HANCOCK | $272,500 | $337,168 | $407,558 | $506,495 | |
NON-METRO | LINCOLN | $317,625 | $357,746 | $434,645 | $506,495 | |
PORTLAND-SOUTH PORTLAND-BIDDEFORD, ME (MSA) | SAGADAHOC | $336,875 | $379,428 | $460,987 | $531,908 | |
PORTLAND-SOUTH PORTLAND-BIDDEFORD, ME (MSA) | YORK | $336,875 | $379,428 | $460,987 | $531,908 | |
MI | NILES-BENTON HARBOR, MI (MSA) | BERRIEN | $298,750 | $337,168 | $408,816 | $506,495 |
KALAMAZOO-PORTAGE, MI (MSA) | KALAMAZOO | $285,625 | $337,168 | $407,558 | $506,495 | |
WARREN-TROY-FARMINGTON HILLS, MI METROPOLITAN | LAPEER | $297,500 | $337,168 | $407,558 | $506,495 | |
ADRIAN, MI (MICRO) | LENAWEE | $297,500 | $337,168 | $407,558 | $506,495 | |
WARREN-TROY-FARMINGTON HILLS, MI METROPOLITAN | LIVINGSTON | $297,500 | $337,168 | $407,558 | $506,495 | |
WARREN-TROY-FARMINGTON HILLS, MI METROPOLITAN | MACOMB | $297,500 | $337,168 | $407,558 | $506,495 | |
MONROE, MI (MSA) | MONROE | $297,500 | $337,168 | $407,558 | $506,495 | |
WARREN-TROY-FARMINGTON HILLS, MI METROPOLITAN | OAKLAND | $297,500 | $337,168 | $407,558 | $506,495 | |
WARREN-TROY-FARMINGTON HILLS, MI METROPOLITAN | ST. CLAIR | $297,500 | $337,168 | $407,558 | $506,495 | |
KALAMAZOO-PORTAGE, MI (MSA) | VAN BUREN | $285,625 | $337,168 | $407,558 | $506,495 | |
ANN ARBOR, MI (MSA) | WASHTENAW | $344,875 | $388,438 | $471,934 | $544,539 | |
DETROIT-LIVONIA-DEARBORN, MI METROPOLITAN | WAYNE | $297,500 | $337,168 | $407,558 | $506,495 | |
MN | MINNEAPOLIS-ST. PAUL-BLOOMINGTON, MN-WI | ANOKA | $331,250 | $373,092 | $453,289 | $523,026 |
MINNEAPOLIS-ST. PAUL-BLOOMINGTON, MN-WI | CARVER | $331,250 | $373,092 | $453,289 | $523,026 | |
MINNEAPOLIS-ST. PAUL-BLOOMINGTON, MN-WI | CHISAGO | $331,250 | $373,092 | $453,289 | $523,026 | |
MINNEAPOLIS-ST. PAUL-BLOOMINGTON, MN-WI | DAKOTA | $331,250 | $373,092 | $453,289 | $523,026 | |
MINNEAPOLIS-ST. PAUL-BLOOMINGTON, MN-WI | HENNEPIN | $331,250 | $373,092 | $453,289 | $523,026 | |
MINNEAPOLIS-ST. PAUL-BLOOMINGTON, MN-WI | ISANTI | $331,250 | $373,092 | $453,289 | $523,026 | |
MINNEAPOLIS-ST. PAUL-BLOOMINGTON, MN-WI | RAMSEY | $331,250 | $373,092 | $453,289 | $523,026 | |
MINNEAPOLIS-ST. PAUL-BLOOMINGTON, MN-WI | SCOTT | $331,250 | $373,092 | $453,289 | $523,026 | |
MINNEAPOLIS-ST. PAUL-BLOOMINGTON, MN-WI | SHERBURNE | $331,250 | $373,092 | $453,289 | $523,026 | |
MINNEAPOLIS-ST. PAUL-BLOOMINGTON, MN-WI | WASHINGTON | $331,250 | $373,092 | $453,289 | $523,026 | |
MINNEAPOLIS-ST. PAUL-BLOOMINGTON, MN-WI | WRIGHT | $331,250 | $373,092 | $453,289 | $523,026 | |
MO | KANSAS CITY, MO-KS (MSA) | BATES | $268,750 | $337,168 | $407,558 | $506,495 |
KANSAS CITY, MO-KS (MSA) | CALDWELL | $268,750 | $337,168 | $407,558 | $506,495 | |
KANSAS CITY, MO-KS (MSA) | CASS | $268,750 | $337,168 | $407,558 | $506,495 | |
KANSAS CITY, MO-KS (MSA) | CLAY | $268,750 | $337,168 | $407,558 | $506,495 | |
KANSAS CITY, MO-KS (MSA) | CLINTON | $268,750 | $337,168 | $407,558 | $506,495 | |
ST. LOUIS, MO-IL (MSA) | CRAWFORD | $281,250 | $337,168 | $407,558 | $506,495 | |
ST. LOUIS, MO-IL (MSA) | FRANKLIN | $281,250 | $337,168 | $407,558 | $506,495 | |
KANSAS CITY, MO-KS (MSA) | JACKSON | $268,750 | $337,168 | $407,558 | $506,495 | |
ST. LOUIS, MO-IL (MSA) | JEFFERSON | $281,250 | $337,168 | $407,558 | $506,495 | |
KANSAS CITY, MO-KS (MSA) | LAFAYETTE | $268,750 | $337,168 | $407,558 | $506,495 | |
ST. LOUIS, MO-IL (MSA) | LINCOLN | $281,250 | $337,168 | $407,558 | $506,495 | |
KANSAS CITY, MO-KS (MSA) | PLATTE | $268,750 | $337,168 | $407,558 | $506,495 | |
KANSAS CITY, MO-KS (MSA) | RAY | $268,750 | $337,168 | $407,558 | $506,495 | |
ST. LOUIS, MO-IL (MSA) | ST. CHARLES | $281,250 | $337,168 | $407,558 | $506,495 | |
ST. LOUIS, MO-IL (MSA) | ST. LOUIS | $281,250 | $337,168 | $407,558 | $506,495 | |
ST. LOUIS, MO-IL (MSA) | ST. LOUIS CITY | $281,250 | $337,168 | $407,558 | $506,495 | |
ST. LOUIS, MO-IL (MSA) | WARREN | $281,250 | $337,168 | $407,558 | $506,495 | |
ST. LOUIS, MO-IL (MSA) | WASHINGTON | $281,250 | $337,168 | $407,558 | $506,495 | |
MT | MISSOULA, MT (MSA) | MISSOULA | $290,625 | $337,168 | $407,558 | $506,495 |
NC | WILMINGTON, NC (MSA) | BRUNSWICK | $303,125 | $341,414 | $414,803 | $506,495 |
VIRGINIA BEACH-NORFOLK-NEWPORT NEWS, VA-NC (MSA) | CURRITUCK | $412,500 | $464,605 | $564,474 | $651,316 | |
RALEIGH-CARY, NC (MSA) | FRANKLIN | $266,875 | $337,168 | $407,558 | $506,495 | |
RALEIGH-CARY, NC (MSA) | JOHNSTON | $266,875 | $337,168 | $407,558 | $506,495 | |
WILMINGTON, NC (MSA) | NEW HANOVER | $303,125 | $341,414 | $414,803 | $506,495 | |
JACKSONVILLE, NC (MSA) | ONSLOW | $306,250 | $344,934 | $419,079 | $506,495 | |
WILMINGTON, NC (MSA) | PENDER | $303,125 | $341,414 | $414,803 | $506,495 | |
RALEIGH-CARY, NC (MSA) | WAKE | $266,875 | $337,168 | $407,558 | $506,495 | |
NH | MANCHESTER-NASHUA, NH (MSA) | HILLSBOROUGH | $401,875 | $488,975 | $591,028 | $734,521 |
CONCORD, NH (MICRO) | MERRIMACK | $277,500 | $337,168 | $407,558 | $506,495 | |
ROCKINGHAM COUNTY-STRAFFORD COUNTY, NH METROPOLITAN | ROCKINGHAM | $477,355 | $606,728 | $737,146 | $850,554 | |
ROCKINGHAM COUNTY-STRAFFORD COUNTY, NH METROPOLITAN | STRAFFORD | $477,355 | $606,728 | $737,146 | $850,554 | |
NJ | ATLANTIC CITY, NJ (MSA) | ATLANTIC | $425,000 | $478,684 | $581,579 | $671,053 |
NEW YORK-WHITE PLAINS-WAYNE, NY-NJ METROPOLITAN | BERGEN | $477,355 | $611,117 | $738,699 | $918,021 | |
CAMDEN, NJ METROPOLITAN DIVISION | BURLINGTON | $385,112 | $433,758 | $526,996 | $608,072 | |
CAMDEN, NJ METROPOLITAN DIVISION | CAMDEN | $385,112 | $433,758 | $526,996 | $608,072 | |
OCEAN CITY, NJ (MSA) | CAPE MAY | $477,355 | $558,934 | $679,079 | $783,553 | |
VINELAND-MILLVILLE-BRIDGETON, NJ (MSA) | CUMBERLAND | $405,000 | $456,158 | $554,211 | $639,474 | |
NEWARK-UNION, NJ-PA METROPOLITAN DIVISION | ESSEX | $477,355 | $611,117 | $738,699 | $918,021 | |
CAMDEN, NJ METROPOLITAN DIVISION | GLOUCESTER | $385,112 | $433,758 | $526,996 | $608,072 | |
NEW YORK-WHITE PLAINS-WAYNE, NY-NJ METROPOLITAN | HUDSON | $477,355 | $611,117 | $738,699 | $918,021 | |
NEWARK-UNION, NJ-PA METROPOLITAN DIVISION | HUNTERDON | $477,355 | $611,117 | $738,699 | $918,021 | |
TRENTON-EWING, NJ (MSA) | MERCER | $439,550 | $495,071 | $601,489 | $694,026 | |
EDISON, NJ METROPOLITAN DIVISION | MIDDLESEX | $477,355 | $611,117 | $738,699 | $918,021 | |
EDISON, NJ METROPOLITAN DIVISION | MONMOUTH | $477,355 | $611,117 | $738,699 | $918,021 | |
NEWARK-UNION, NJ-PA METROPOLITAN DIVISION | MORRIS | $477,355 | $611,117 | $738,699 | $918,021 | |
EDISON, NJ METROPOLITAN DIVISION | OCEAN | $477,355 | $611,117 | $738,699 | $918,021 | |
NEW YORK-WHITE PLAINS-WAYNE, NY-NJ METROPOLITAN | PASSAIC | $477,355 | $611,117 | $738,699 | $918,021 | |
WILMINGTON, DE-MD-NJ METROPOLITAN DIVISION | SALEM | $385,112 | $433,758 | $526,996 | $608,072 | |
EDISON, NJ METROPOLITAN DIVISION | SOMERSET | $477,355 | $611,117 | $738,699 | $918,021 | |
NEWARK-UNION, NJ-PA METROPOLITAN DIVISION | SUSSEX | $477,355 | $611,117 | $738,699 | $918,021 | |
NEWARK-UNION, NJ-PA METROPOLITAN DIVISION | UNION | $477,355 | $611,117 | $738,699 | $918,021 | |
ALLENTOWN-BETHLEHEM-EASTON, PA-NJ (MSA) | WARREN | $402,192 | $459,255 | $557,974 | $643,816 | |
NM | LOS ALAMOS, NM (MICRO) | LOS ALAMOS | $318,750 | $359,013 | $436,184 | $506,495 |
FARMINGTON, NM (MSA) | SAN JUAN | $281,250 | $337,168 | $407,558 | $506,495 | |
SANTA FE, NM (MSA) | SANTA FE | $381,999 | $449,471 | $546,086 | $630,099 | |
NV | CARSON CITY, NV (MSA) | CARSON CITY | $398,750 | $449,118 | $545,658 | $629,605 |
LAS VEGAS-PARADISE, NV (MSA) | CLARK | $400,000 | $450,526 | $547,368 | $631,579 | |
GARDNERVILLE RANCHOS, NV (MICRO) | DOUGLAS | $477,355 | $582,829 | $708,158 | $817,105 | |
ELKO, NV (MICRO) | ELKO | $325,000 | $366,053 | $444,737 | $513,158 | |
ELKO, NV (MICRO) | EUREKA | $325,000 | $366,053 | $444,737 | $513,158 | |
FERNLEY, NV (MICRO) | LYON | $331,250 | $373,092 | $453,289 | $523,026 | |
PAHRUMP, NV (MICRO) | NYE | $325,000 | $366,053 | $444,737 | $513,158 | |
RENO-SPARKS, NV (MSA) | STOREY | $477,355 | $537,653 | $653,222 | $753,718 | |
RENO-SPARKS, NV (MSA) | WASHOE | $477,355 | $537,653 | $653,222 | $753,718 | |
NY | ALBANY-SCHENECTADY-TROY, NY (MSA) | ALBANY | $300,000 | $337,895 | $410,526 | $506,495 |
NEW YORK-WHITE PLAINS-WAYNE, NY-NJ METRO | BRONX | $477,355 | $611,117 | $738,699 | $918,021 | |
POUGHKEEPSIE-NEWBURGH-MIDDLETOWN, NY (MSA) | DUTCHESS | $443,750 | $499,803 | $607,237 | $700,658 | |
BUFFALO-NIAGARA FALLS, NY (MSA) | ERIE | $275,075 | $337,168 | $407,558 | $506,495 | |
NEW YORK-WHITE PLAINS-WAYNE, NY-NJ METROPOLITAN | KINGS | $477,355 | $611,117 | $738,699 | $918,021 | |
ROCHESTER, NY (MSA) | LIVINGSTON | $268,750 | $337,168 | $407,558 | $506,495 | |
SYRACUSE, NY (MSA) | MADISON | $267,500 | $337,168 | $407,558 | $506,495 | |
ROCHESTER, NY (MSA) | MONROE | $268,750 | $337,168 | $407,558 | $506,495 | |
NASSAU-SUFFOLK, NY METROPOLITAN DIVISION | NASSAU | $477,355 | $611,117 | $738,699 | $918,021 | |
NEW YORK-WHITE PLAINS-WAYNE, NY-NJ METROPOLITAN | NEW YORK | $477,355 | $611,117 | $738,699 | $918,021 | |
BUFFALO-NIAGARA FALLS, NY (MSA) | NIAGARA | $275,075 | $337,168 | $407,558 | $506,495 | |
SYRACUSE, NY (MSA) | ONONDAGA | $267,500 | $337,168 | $407,558 | $506,495 | |
ROCHESTER, NY (MSA) | ONTARIO | $268,750 | $337,168 | $407,558 | $506,495 | |
POUGHKEEPSIE-NEWBURGH-MIDDLETOWN, NY (MSA) | ORANGE | $443,750 | $499,803 | $607,237 | $700,658 | |
ROCHESTER, NY (MSA) | ORLEANS | $268,750 | $337,168 | $407,558 | $506,495 | |
SYRACUSE, NY (MSA) | OSWEGO | $267,500 | $337,168 | $407,558 | $506,495 | |
NEW YORK-WHITE PLAINS-WAYNE, NY-NJ METRO | PUTNAM | $477,355 | $611,117 | $738,699 | $918,021 | |
NEW YORK-WHITE PLAINS-WAYNE, NY-NJ METRO | QUEENS | $477,355 | $611,117 | $738,699 | $918,021 | |
ALBANY-SCHENECTADY-TROY, NY (MSA) | RENSSELAER | $300,000 | $337,895 | $410,526 | $506,495 | |
NEW YORK-WHITE PLAINS-WAYNE, NY-NJ METRO | RICHMOND | $477,355 | $611,117 | $738,699 | $918,021 | |
NEW YORK-WHITE PLAINS-WAYNE, NY-NJ METRO | ROCKLAND | $477,355 | $611,117 | $738,699 | $918,021 | |
ALBANY-SCHENECTADY-TROY, NY (MSA) | SARATOGA | $300,000 | $337,895 | $410,526 | $506,495 | |
ALBANY-SCHENECTADY-TROY, NY (MSA) | SCHENECTADY | $300,000 | $337,895 | $410,526 | $506,495 | |
ALBANY-SCHENECTADY-TROY, NY (MSA) | SCHOHARIE | $300,000 | $337,895 | $410,526 | $506,495 | |
NASSAU-SUFFOLK, NY METROPOLITAN DIVISION | SUFFOLK | $477,355 | $611,117 | $738,699 | $918,021 | |
KINGSTON, NY (MSA) | ULSTER | $406,250 | $457,566 | $555,921 | $641,447 | |
ROCHESTER, NY (MSA) | WAYNE | $268,750 | $337,168 | $407,558 | $506,495 | |
NEW YORK-WHITE PLAINS-WAYNE, NY-NJ METRO | WESTCHESTER | $477,355 | $611,117 | $738,699 | $918,021 | |
OH | ASHTABULA, OH (MICRO) | ASHTABULA | $290,797 | $337,168 | $407,558 | $506,495 |
CINCINNATI-MIDDLETOWN, OH-KY-IN (MSA) | BROWN | $332,500 | $374,500 | $455,000 | $525,000 | |
CINCINNATI-MIDDLETOWN, OH-KY-IN (MSA) | BUTLER | $332,500 | $374,500 | $455,000 | $525,000 | |
CANTON-MASSILLON, OH (MSA) | CARROLL | $277,500 | $337,168 | $407,558 | $506,495 | |
CINCINNATI-MIDDLETOWN, OH-KY-IN (MSA) | CLERMONT | $332,500 | $374,500 | $455,000 | $525,000 | |
CLEVELAND-ELYRIA-MENTOR, OH (MSA) | CUYAHOGA | $297,550 | $337,168 | $407,558 | $506,495 | |
COLUMBUS, OH (MSA) | DELAWARE | $307,500 | $346,342 | $420,789 | $506,495 | |
COLUMBUS, OH (MSA) | FAIRFIELD | $307,500 | $346,342 | $420,789 | $506,495 | |
COLUMBUS, OH (MSA) | FRANKLIN | $307,500 | $346,342 | $420,789 | $506,495 | |
CLEVELAND-ELYRIA-MENTOR, OH (MSA) | GEAUGA | $297,550 | $337,168 | $407,558 | $506,495 | |
DAYTON, OH (MSA) | GREENE | $271,250 | $337,168 | $407,558 | $506,495 | |
CINCINNATI-MIDDLETOWN, OH-KY-IN (MSA) | HAMILTON | $332,500 | $374,500 | $455,000 | $525,000 | |
CLEVELAND-ELYRIA-MENTOR, OH (MSA) | LAKE | $297,550 | $337,168 | $407,558 | $506,495 | |
COLUMBUS, OH (MSA) | LICKING | $307,500 | $346,342 | $420,789 | $506,495 | |
CLEVELAND-ELYRIA-MENTOR, OH (MSA) | LORAIN | $297,550 | $337,168 | $407,558 | $506,495 | |
COLUMBUS, OH (MSA) | MADISON | $307,500 | $346,342 | $420,789 | $506,495 | |
CLEVELAND-ELYRIA-MENTOR, OH (MSA) | MEDINA | $297,550 | $337,168 | $407,558 | $506,495 | |
DAYTON, OH (MSA) | MIAMI | $271,250 | $337,168 | $407,558 | $506,495 | |
DAYTON, OH (MSA) | MONTGOMERY | $271,250 | $337,168 | $407,558 | $506,495 | |
COLUMBUS, OH (MSA) | MORROW | $307,500 | $346,342 | $420,789 | $506,495 | |
COLUMBUS, OH (MSA) | PICKAWAY | $307,500 | $346,342 | $420,789 | $506,495 | |
AKRON, OH (MSA) | PORTAGE | $330,000 | $371,684 | $451,579 | $521,053 | |
DAYTON, OH (MSA) | PREBLE | $271,250 | $337,168 | $407,558 | $506,495 | |
CANTON-MASSILLON, OH (MSA) | STARK | $277,500 | $337,168 | $407,558 | $506,495 | |
AKRON, OH (MSA) | SUMMIT | $330,000 | $371,684 | $451,579 | $521,053 | |
COLUMBUS, OH (MSA) | UNION | $307,500 | $346,342 | $420,789 | $506,495 | |
CINCINNATI-MIDDLETOWN, OH-KY-IN (MSA) | WARREN | $332,500 | $374,500 | $455,000 | $525,000 | |
OR | CORVALLIS, OR (MSA) | BENTON | $307,500 | $346,342 | $420,789 | $506,495 |
PORTLAND-VANCOUVER-BEAVERTON, OR-WA (MSA) | CLACKAMAS | $374,474 | $421,776 | $512,437 | $591,316 | |
ASTORIA, OR (MICRO) | CLATSOP | $287,500 | $337,168 | $407,558 | $506,495 | |
PORTLAND-VANCOUVER-BEAVERTON, OR-WA (MSA) | COLUMBIA | $374,474 | $421,776 | $512,437 | $591,316 | |
BEND, OR (MSA) | DESCHUTES | $427,250 | $481,218 | $584,658 | $674,605 | |
MEDFORD, OR (MSA) | JACKSON | $422,500 | $475,868 | $578,158 | $667,105 | |
GRANTS PASS, OR (MICRO) | JOSEPHINE | $324,868 | $365,904 | $444,557 | $512,961 | |
EUGENE-SPRINGFIELD, OR (MSA) | LANE | $331,250 | $373,092 | $453,289 | $523,026 | |
NON-METRO | LINCOLN | $277,500 | $337,168 | $407,558 | $506,495 | |
SALEM, OR (MSA) | MARION | $285,000 | $337,168 | $407,558 | $506,495 | |
PORTLAND-VANCOUVER-BEAVERTON, OR-WA (MSA) | MULTNOMAH | $374,474 | $421,776 | $512,437 | $591,316 | |
SALEM, OR (MSA) | POLK | $285,000 | $337,168 | $407,558 | $506,495 | |
NON-METRO | TILLAMOOK | $297,500 | $337,168 | $407,558 | $506,495 | |
PORTLAND-VANCOUVER-BEAVERTON, OR-WA (MSA) | WASHINGTON | $374,474 | $421,776 | $512,437 | $591,316 | |
PORTLAND-VANCOUVER-BEAVERTON, OR-WA (MSA) | YAMHILL | $374,474 | $421,776 | $512,437 | $591,316 | |
PA | PITTSBURGH, PA (MSA) | ALLEGHENY | $327,500 | $368,868 | $448,158 | $517,105 |
PITTSBURGH, PA (MSA) | ARMSTRONG | $327,500 | $368,868 | $448,158 | $517,105 | |
PITTSBURGH, PA (MSA) | BEAVER | $327,500 | $368,868 | $448,158 | $517,105 | |
READING, PA (MSA) | BERKS | $300,000 | $337,895 | $410,526 | $506,495 | |
PHILADELPHIA, PA METROPOLITAN DIVISION | BUCKS | $385,112 | $433,758 | $526,996 | $608,072 | |
PITTSBURGH, PA (MSA) | BUTLER | $327,500 | $368,868 | $448,158 | $517,105 | |
ALLENTOWN-BETHLEHEM-EASTON, PA-NJ (MSA) | CARBON | $402,192 | $459,255 | $557,974 | $643,816 | |
STATE COLLEGE, PA (MSA) | CENTRE | $279,375 | $337,168 | $407,558 | $506,495 | |
PHILADELPHIA, PA METROPOLITAN DIVISION | CHESTER | $385,112 | $433,758 | $526,996 | $608,072 | |
PHILADELPHIA, PA METROPOLITAN DIVISION | DELAWARE | $385,112 | $433,758 | $526,996 | $608,072 | |
PITTSBURGH, PA (MSA) | FAYETTE | $327,500 | $368,868 | $448,158 | $517,105 | |
LANCASTER, PA (MSA) | LANCASTER | $383,250 | $431,661 | $524,447 | $605,132 | |
ALLENTOWN-BETHLEHEM-EASTON, PA-NJ (MSA) | LEHIGH | $402,192 | $459,255 | $557,974 | $643,816 | |
PHILADELPHIA, PA METROPOLITAN DIVISION | MONTGOMERY | $385,112 | $433,758 | $526,996 | $608,072 | |
ALLENTOWN-BETHLEHEM-EASTON, PA-NJ (MSA) | NORTHAMPTON | $402,192 | $459,255 | $557,974 | $643,816 | |
PHILADELPHIA, PA METROPOLITAN DIVISION | PHILADELPHIA | $385,112 | $433,758 | $526,996 | $608,072 | |
NEWARK-UNION, NJ-PA METROPOLITAN DIVISION | PIKE | $477,355 | $611,117 | $738,699 | $918,021 | |
PITTSBURGH, PA (MSA) | WASHINGTON | $327,500 | $368,868 | $448,158 | $517,105 | |
PITTSBURGH, PA (MSA) | WESTMORELAND | $327,500 | $368,868 | $448,158 | $517,105 | |
YORK-HANOVER, PA (MSA) | YORK | $424,587 | $478,218 | $581,014 | $670,401 | |
PR | SAN JUAN-CAGUAS-GUAYNABO, PR (MSA) | AGUAS BUENAS | $325,000 | $366,053 | $444,737 | $513,158 |
SAN JUAN-CAGUAS-GUAYNABO, PR (MSA) | AIBONITO | $325,000 | $366,053 | $444,737 | $513,158 | |
SAN JUAN-CAGUAS-GUAYNABO, PR (MSA) | ARECIBO | $325,000 | $366,053 | $444,737 | $513,158 | |
SAN JUAN-CAGUAS-GUAYNABO, PR (MSA) | BARCELONETA | $325,000 | $366,053 | $444,737 | $513,158 | |
SAN JUAN-CAGUAS-GUAYNABO, PR (MSA) | BARRANQUITAS | $325,000 | $366,053 | $444,737 | $513,158 | |
SAN JUAN-CAGUAS-GUAYNABO, PR (MSA) | BAYAMON | $325,000 | $366,053 | $444,737 | $513,158 | |
SAN JUAN-CAGUAS-GUAYNABO, PR (MSA) | CAGUAS | $325,000 | $366,053 | $444,737 | $513,158 | |
SAN JUAN-CAGUAS-GUAYNABO, PR (MSA) | CAMUY | $325,000 | $366,053 | $444,737 | $513,158 | |
SAN JUAN-CAGUAS-GUAYNABO, PR (MSA) | CANOVANAS | $325,000 | $366,053 | $444,737 | $513,158 | |
SAN JUAN-CAGUAS-GUAYNABO, PR (MSA) | CAROLINA | $325,000 | $366,053 | $444,737 | $513,158 | |
SAN JUAN-CAGUAS-GUAYNABO, PR (MSA) | CATANO | $325,000 | $366,053 | $444,737 | $513,158 | |
SAN JUAN-CAGUAS-GUAYNABO, PR (MSA) | CAYEY | $325,000 | $366,053 | $444,737 | $513,158 | |
FAJARDO, PR (MSA) | CEIBA | $325,000 | $366,053 | $444,737 | $513,158 | |
SAN JUAN-CAGUAS-GUAYNABO, PR (MSA) | CIALES | $325,000 | $366,053 | $444,737 | $513,158 | |
SAN JUAN-CAGUAS-GUAYNABO, PR (MSA) | CIDRA | $325,000 | $366,053 | $444,737 | $513,158 | |
SAN JUAN-CAGUAS-GUAYNABO, PR (MSA) | COMERIO | $325,000 | $366,053 | $444,737 | $513,158 | |
SAN JUAN-CAGUAS-GUAYNABO, PR (MSA) | COROZAL | $325,000 | $366,053 | $444,737 | $513,158 | |
SAN JUAN-CAGUAS-GUAYNABO, PR (MSA) | DORADO | $325,000 | $366,053 | $444,737 | $513,158 | |
FAJARDO, PR (MSA) | FAJARDO | $325,000 | $366,053 | $444,737 | $513,158 | |
SAN JUAN-CAGUAS-GUAYNABO, PR (MSA) | FLORIDA | $325,000 | $366,053 | $444,737 | $513,158 | |
SAN JUAN-CAGUAS-GUAYNABO, PR (MSA) | GUAYNABO | $325,000 | $366,053 | $444,737 | $513,158 | |
SAN JUAN-CAGUAS-GUAYNABO, PR (MSA) | GURABO | $325,000 | $366,053 | $444,737 | $513,158 | |
SAN JUAN-CAGUAS-GUAYNABO, PR (MSA) | HATILLO | $325,000 | $366,053 | $444,737 | $513,158 | |
SAN JUAN-CAGUAS-GUAYNABO, PR (MSA) | HUMACAO | $325,000 | $366,053 | $444,737 | $513,158 | |
SAN JUAN-CAGUAS-GUAYNABO, PR (MSA) | JUNCOS | $325,000 | $366,053 | $444,737 | $513,158 | |
SAN JUAN-CAGUAS-GUAYNABO, PR (MSA) | LAS PIEDRAS | $325,000 | $366,053 | $444,737 | $513,158 | |
SAN JUAN-CAGUAS-GUAYNABO, PR (MSA) | LOIZA | $325,000 | $366,053 | $444,737 | $513,158 | |
FAJARDO, PR (MSA) | LUQUILLO | $325,000 | $366,053 | $444,737 | $513,158 | |
SAN JUAN-CAGUAS-GUAYNABO, PR (MSA) | MANATI | $325,000 | $366,053 | $444,737 | $513,158 | |
SAN JUAN-CAGUAS-GUAYNABO, PR (MSA) | MAUNABO | $325,000 | $366,053 | $444,737 | $513,158 | |
SAN JUAN-CAGUAS-GUAYNABO, PR (MSA) | MOROVIS | $325,000 | $366,053 | $444,737 | $513,158 | |
SAN JUAN-CAGUAS-GUAYNABO, PR (MSA) | NAGUABO | $325,000 | $366,053 | $444,737 | $513,158 | |
SAN JUAN-CAGUAS-GUAYNABO, PR (MSA) | NARANJITO | $325,000 | $366,053 | $444,737 | $513,158 | |
SAN JUAN-CAGUAS-GUAYNABO, PR (MSA) | OROCOVIS | $325,000 | $366,053 | $444,737 | $513,158 | |
SAN JUAN-CAGUAS-GUAYNABO, PR (MSA) | QUEBRADILLAS | $325,000 | $366,053 | $444,737 | $513,158 | |
SAN JUAN-CAGUAS-GUAYNABO, PR (MSA) | RIO GRANDE | $325,000 | $366,053 | $444,737 | $513,158 | |
SAN JUAN-CAGUAS-GUAYNABO, PR (MSA) | SAN JUAN | $325,000 | $366,053 | $444,737 | $513,158 | |
SAN JUAN-CAGUAS-GUAYNABO, PR (MSA) | SAN LORENZO | $325,000 | $366,053 | $444,737 | $513,158 | |
SAN JUAN-CAGUAS-GUAYNABO, PR (MSA) | TOA ALTA | $325,000 | $366,053 | $444,737 | $513,158 | |
SAN JUAN-CAGUAS-GUAYNABO, PR (MSA) | TOA BAJA | $325,000 | $366,053 | $444,737 | $513,158 | |
SAN JUAN-CAGUAS-GUAYNABO, PR (MSA) | TRUJILLO ALTO | $325,000 | $366,053 | $444,737 | $513,158 | |
SAN JUAN-CAGUAS-GUAYNABO, PR (MSA) | VEGA ALTA | $325,000 | $366,053 | $444,737 | $513,158 | |
SAN JUAN-CAGUAS-GUAYNABO, PR (MSA) | VEGA BAJA | $325,000 | $366,053 | $444,737 | $513,158 | |
SAN JUAN-CAGUAS-GUAYNABO, PR (MSA) | YABUCOA | $325,000 | $366,053 | $444,737 | $513,158 | |
RI | PROVIDENCE-NEW BEDFORD-FALL RIVER, RI-MA | BRISTOL | $416,250 | $472,891 | $571,567 | $710,309 |
PROVIDENCE-NEW BEDFORD-FALL RIVER, RI-MA | KENT | $416,250 | $472,891 | $571,567 | $710,309 | |
PROVIDENCE-NEW BEDFORD-FALL RIVER, RI-MA | NEWPORT | $416,250 | $472,891 | $571,567 | $710,309 | |
PROVIDENCE-NEW BEDFORD-FALL RIVER, RI-MA | PROVIDENCE | $416,250 | $472,891 | $571,567 | $710,309 | |
PROVIDENCE-NEW BEDFORD-FALL RIVER, RI-MA | WASHINGTON | $416,250 | $472,891 | $571,567 | $710,309 | |
SC | HILTON HEAD ISLAND-BEAUFORT, SC (MICRO) | BEAUFORT | $373,750 | $420,961 | $511,447 | $590,132 |
CHARLESTON-NORTH CHARLESTON, SC (MSA) | BERKELEY | $334,375 | $376,612 | $457,566 | $527,961 | |
CHARLESTON-NORTH CHARLESTON, SC (MSA) | CHARLESTON | $334,375 | $376,612 | $457,566 | $527,961 | |
CHARLESTON-NORTH CHARLESTON, SC (MSA) | DORCHESTER | $334,375 | $376,612 | $457,566 | $527,961 | |
HILTON HEAD ISLAND-BEAUFORT, SC (MICRO) | JASPER | $373,750 | $420,961 | $511,447 | $590,132 | |
TN | NASHVILLE-DAVIDSON—MURFREESBORO, TN (MSA) | CANNON | $297,500 | $337,168 | $407,558 | $506,495 |
NASHVILLE-DAVIDSON—MURFREESBORO, TN (MSA) | CHEATHAM | $297,500 | $337,168 | $407,558 | $506,495 | |
NASHVILLE-DAVIDSON—MURFREESBORO, TN (MSA) | DAVIDSON | $297,500 | $337,168 | $407,558 | $506,495 | |
NASHVILLE-DAVIDSON—MURFREESBORO, TN (MSA) | DICKSON | $297,500 | $337,168 | $407,558 | $506,495 | |
NASHVILLE-DAVIDSON—MURFREESBORO, TN (MSA) | HICKMAN | $297,500 | $337,168 | $407,558 | $506,495 | |
NASHVILLE-DAVIDSON—MURFREESBORO, TN (MSA) | MACON | $297,500 | $337,168 | $407,558 | $506,495 | |
NASHVILLE-DAVIDSON—MURFREESBORO, TN (MSA) | ROBERTSON | $297,500 | $337,168 | $407,558 | $506,495 | |
NASHVILLE-DAVIDSON—MURFREESBORO, TN (MSA) | RUTHERFORD | $297,500 | $337,168 | $407,558 | $506,495 | |
NASHVILLE-DAVIDSON—MURFREESBORO, TN (MSA) | SMITH | $297,500 | $337,168 | $407,558 | $506,495 | |
NASHVILLE-DAVIDSON—MURFREESBORO, TN (MSA) | SUMNER | $297,500 | $337,168 | $407,558 | $506,495 | |
NASHVILLE-DAVIDSON—MURFREESBORO, TN (MSA) | TROUSDALE | $297,500 | $337,168 | $407,558 | $506,495 | |
NASHVILLE-DAVIDSON—MURFREESBORO, TN (MSA) | WILLIAMSON | $297,500 | $337,168 | $407,558 | $506,495 | |
NASHVILLE-DAVIDSON—MURFREESBORO, TN (MSA) | WILSON | $297,500 | $337,168 | $407,558 | $506,495 | |
UT | PROVO-OREM, UT (MSA) | JUAB | $273,750 | $337,168 | $407,558 | $506,495 |
NON-METRO | KANE | $268,750 | $337,168 | $407,558 | $506,495 | |
SALT LAKE CITY, UT (MSA) | SALT LAKE | $306,250 | $344,934 | $419,079 | $506,495 | |
SALT LAKE CITY, UT (MSA) | SUMMIT | $306,250 | $344,934 | $419,079 | $506,495 | |
SALT LAKE CITY, UT (MSA) | TOOELE | $306,250 | $344,934 | $419,079 | $506,495 | |
PROVO-OREM, UT (MSA) | UTAH | $273,750 | $337,168 | $407,558 | $506,495 | |
ST. GEORGE, UT (MSA) | WASHINGTON | $366,875 | $413,217 | $502,039 | $579,276 | |
VA | CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA (MSA) | ALBEMARLE | $399,375 | $449,822 | $546,513 | $630,592 |
WASHINGTON-ARLINGTON-ALEXANDRIA, DC-VA-METROPOLITAN | ALEXANDRIA | $477,355 | $611,117 | $738,699 | $888,158 | |
RICHMOND, VA (MSA) | AMELIA | $344,375 | $387,875 | $471,250 | $543,750 | |
WASHINGTON-ARLINGTON-ALEXANDRIA, DC-VA-METROPOLITAN | ARLINGTON | $477,355 | $611,117 | $738,699 | $888,158 | |
RICHMOND, VA (MSA) | CAROLINE | $344,375 | $387,875 | $471,250 | $543,750 | |
RICHMOND, VA (MSA) | CHARLES CITY | $344,375 | $387,875 | $471,250 | $543,750 | |
CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA (MSA) | CHARLOTTESVILLE | $399,375 | $449,822 | $546,513 | $630,592 | |
VIRGINIA BEACH-NORFOLK-NEWPORT NEWS, VA-METROPOLITAN | CHESAPEAKE | $412,500 | $464,605 | $564,474 | $651,316 | |
RICHMOND, VA (MSA) | CHESTERFIELD | $344,375 | $387,875 | $471,250 | $543,750 | |
WASHINGTON-ARLINGTON-ALEXANDRIA, DC-VA-METROPOLITAN | CLARKE | $477,355 | $611,117 | $738,699 | $888,158 | |
RICHMOND, VA (MSA) | COLONIAL HEIGHT | $344,375 | $387,875 | $471,250 | $543,750 | |
CULPEPER, VA (MICRO) | CULPEPER | $381,999 | $448,442 | $544,837 | $628,658 | |
RICHMOND, VA (MSA) | CUMBERLAND | $344,375 | $387,875 | $471,250 | $543,750 | |
RICHMOND, VA (MSA) | DINWIDDIE | $344,375 | $387,875 | $471,250 | $543,750 | |
WASHINGTON-ARLINGTON-ALEXANDRIA, DC-VA-METROPOLITAN | FAIRFAX | $477,355 | $611,117 | $738,699 | $888,158 | |
WASHINGTON-ARLINGTON-ALEXANDRIA, DC-VA-METROPOLITAN | FAIRFAX IND | $477,355 | $611,117 | $738,699 | $888,158 | |
WASHINGTON-ARLINGTON-ALEXANDRIA, DC-VA-METROPOLITAN | FALLS CHURCH | $477,355 | $611,117 | $738,699 | $888,158 | |
WASHINGTON-ARLINGTON-ALEXANDRIA, DC-VA-METROPOLITAN | FAUQUIER | $477,355 | $611,117 | $738,699 | $888,158 | |
CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA (MSA) | FLUVANNA | $399,375 | $449,822 | $546,513 | $630,592 | |
WINCHESTER, VA-WV (MSA) | FREDERICK | $475,000 | $535,000 | $650,000 | $750,000 | |
WASHINGTON-ARLINGTON-ALEXANDRIA, DC-VA-METROPOLITAN | FREDERICKSBURG | $477,355 | $611,117 | $738,699 | $888,158 | |
VIRGINIA BEACH-NORFOLK-NEWPORT NEWS, VA-METROPOLITAN | GLOUCESTER | $412,500 | $464,605 | $564,474 | $651,316 | |
RICHMOND, VA (MSA) | GOOCHLAND | $344,375 | $387,875 | $471,250 | $543,750 | |
CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA (MSA) | GREENE | $399,375 | $449,822 | $546,513 | $630,592 | |
VIRGINIA BEACH-NORFOLK-NEWPORT NEWS, VA-METROPOLITAN | HAMPTON | $412,500 | $464,605 | $564,474 | $651,316 | |
RICHMOND, VA (MSA) | HANOVER | $344,375 | $387,875 | $471,250 | $543,750 | |
RICHMOND, VA (MSA) | HENRICO | $344,375 | $387,875 | $471,250 | $543,750 | |
RICHMOND, VA (MSA) | HOPEWELL | $344,375 | $387,875 | $471,250 | $543,750 | |
VIRGINIA BEACH-NORFOLK-NEWPORT NEWS, VA-METROPOLITAN | ISLE OF WIGHT | $412,500 | $464,605 | $564,474 | $651,316 | |
VIRGINIA BEACH-NORFOLK-NEWPORT NEWS, VA-METROPOLITAN | JAMES CITY | $412,500 | $464,605 | $564,474 | $651,316 | |
RICHMOND, VA (MSA) | KING AND QUEEN | $344,375 | $387,875 | $471,250 | $543,750 | |
NON-METRO | KING GEORGE | $381,999 | $448,442 | $544,837 | $628,658 | |
RICHMOND, VA (MSA) | KING WILLIAM | $344,375 | $387,875 | $471,250 | $543,750 | |
WASHINGTON-ARLINGTON-ALEXANDRIA, DC-VA-METROPOLITAN | LOUDOUN | $477,355 | $611,117 | $738,699 | $888,158 | |
RICHMOND, VA (MSA) | LOUISA | $344,375 | $387,875 | $471,250 | $543,750 | |
WASHINGTON-ARLINGTON-ALEXANDRIA, DC-VA-METROPOLITAN | MANASSAS | $477,355 | $611,117 | $738,699 | $888,158 | |
WASHINGTON-ARLINGTON-ALEXANDRIA, DC-VA-METROPOLITAN | MANASSAS PARK | $477,355 | $611,117 | $738,699 | $888,158 | |
VIRGINIA BEACH-NORFOLK-NEWPORT NEWS, VA-METROPOLITAN | MATHEWS | $412,500 | $464,605 | $564,474 | $651,316 | |
CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA (MSA) | NELSON | $399,375 | $449,822 | $546,513 | $630,592 | |
RICHMOND, VA (MSA) | NEW KENT | $344,375 | $387,875 | $471,250 | $543,750 | |
VIRGINIA BEACH-NORFOLK-NEWPORT NEWS, VA-METROPOLITAN | NEWPORT NEWS | $412,500 | $464,605 | $564,474 | $651,316 | |
VIRGINIA BEACH-NORFOLK-NEWPORT NEWS, VA-METROPOLITAN | NORFOLK | $412,500 | $464,605 | $564,474 | $651,316 | |
RICHMOND, VA (MSA) | PETERSBURG | $344,375 | $387,875 | $471,250 | $543,750 | |
VIRGINIA BEACH-NORFOLK-NEWPORT NEWS, VA-METROPOLITAN | POQUOSON | $412,500 | $464,605 | $564,474 | $651,316 | |
VIRGINIA BEACH-NORFOLK-NEWPORT NEWS, VA-METROPOLITAN | PORTSMOUTH | $412,500 | $464,605 | $564,474 | $651,316 | |
RICHMOND, VA (MSA) | POWHATAN | $344,375 | $387,875 | $471,250 | $543,750 | |
RICHMOND, VA (MSA) | PRINCE GEORGE | $344,375 | $387,875 | $471,250 | $543,750 | |
WASHINGTON-ARLINGTON-ALEXANDRIA, DC-VA-METROPOLITAN | PRINCE WILLIAM | $477,355 | $611,117 | $738,699 | $888,158 | |
RICHMOND, VA (MSA) | RICHMOND IND | $344,375 | $387,875 | $471,250 | $543,750 | |
WASHINGTON-ARLINGTON-ALEXANDRIA, DC-VA-METROPOLITAN | SPOTSYLVANIA | $477,355 | $611,117 | $738,699 | $888,158 | |
WASHINGTON-ARLINGTON-ALEXANDRIA, DC-VA-METROPOLITAN | STAFFORD | $477,355 | $611,117 | $738,699 | $888,158 | |
VIRGINIA BEACH-NORFOLK-NEWPORT NEWS, VA-METROPOLITAN | SUFFOLK | $412,500 | $464,605 | $564,474 | $651,316 | |
VIRGINIA BEACH-NORFOLK-NEWPORT NEWS, VA-METROPOLITAN | SURRY | $412,500 | $464,605 | $564,474 | $651,316 | |
RICHMOND, VA (MSA) | SUSSEX | $344,375 | $387,875 | $471,250 | $543,750 | |
VIRGINIA BEACH-NORFOLK-NEWPORT NEWS, VA-METROPOLITAN | VIRGINIA BEACH | $412,500 | $464,605 | $564,474 | $651,316 | |
WASHINGTON-ARLINGTON-ALEXANDRIA, DC-VA-METROPOLITAN | WARREN | $477,355 | $611,117 | $738,699 | $888,158 | |
VIRGINIA BEACH-NORFOLK-NEWPORT NEWS, VA-METROPOLITAN | WILLIAMSBURG | $412,500 | $464,605 | $564,474 | $651,316 | |
WINCHESTER, VA-WV (MSA) | WINCHESTER | $475,000 | $535,000 | $650,000 | $750,000 | |
VIRGINIA BEACH-NORFOLK-NEWPORT NEWS, VA-METROPOLITAN | YORK | $412,500 | $464,605 | $564,474 | $651,316 | |
VI | NON-METRO | ST. CROIX | $287,500 | $337,168 | $407,558 | $506,495 |
NON-METRO | ST. THOMAS | $318,750 | $359,013 | $436,184 | $506,495 | |
VT | BURLINGTON-SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT (MSA) | CHITTENDEN | $318,750 | $359,013 | $436,184 | $506,495 |
BURLINGTON-SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT (MSA) | FRANKLIN | $318,750 | $359,013 | $436,184 | $506,495 | |
BURLINGTON-SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT (MSA) | GRAND ISLE | $318,750 | $359,013 | $436,184 | $506,495 | |
WA | WENATCHEE, WA (MSA) | CHELAN | $281,250 | $337,168 | $407,558 | $506,495 |
PORT ANGELES, WA (MICRO) | CLALLAM | $296,250 | $337,168 | $407,558 | $506,495 | |
PORTLAND-VANCOUVER-BEAVERTON, OR-WA (MSA) | CLARK | $374,474 | $421,776 | $512,437 | $591,316 | |
WENATCHEE, WA (MSA) | DOUGLAS | $281,250 | $337,168 | $407,558 | $506,495 | |
OAK HARBOR, WA (MICRO) | ISLAND | $366,842 | $413,179 | $502,039 | $579,276 | |
NON-METRO | JEFFERSON | $420,000 | $473,053 | $574,737 | $663,158 | |
SEATTLE-BELLEVUE-EVERETT, WA METROPOLITAN | KING | $477,355 | $542,039 | $658,553 | $759,868 | |
BREMERTON-SILVERDALE, WA (MSA) | KITSAP | $475,000 | $535,000 | $650,000 | $750,000 | |
TACOMA, WA METROPOLITAN DIVISION | PIERCE | $477,355 | $542,039 | $658,553 | $759,868 | |
NON-METRO | SAN JUAN | $477,355 | $598,355 | $726,974 | $838,816 | |
MOUNT VERNON-ANACORTES, WA (MSA) | SKAGIT | $373,662 | $420,862 | $511,328 | $589,993 | |
PORTLAND-VANCOUVER-BEAVERTON, OR-WA (MSA) | SKAMANIA | $374,474 | $421,776 | $512,437 | $591,316 | |
SEATTLE-BELLEVUE-EVERETT, WA METROPOLITAN | SNOHOMISH | $477,355 | $542,039 | $658,553 | $759,868 | |
OLYMPIA, WA (MSA) | THURSTON | $344,505 | $388,022 | $471,429 | $543,957 | |
BELLINGHAM, WA (MSA) | WHATCOM | $375,000 | $422,368 | $513,158 | $592,105 | |
WI | MADISON, WI (MSA) | COLUMBIA | $284,625 | $337,168 | $407,558 | $506,495 |
MADISON, WI (MSA) | DANE | $284,625 | $337,168 | $407,558 | $506,495 | |
MADISON, WI (MSA) | IOWA | $284,625 | $337,168 | $407,558 | $506,495 | |
LAKE COUNTY-KENOSHA COUNTY, IL-WI METROPOLITAN | KENOSHA | $362,105 | $407,845 | $495,512 | $571,745 | |
MILWAUKEE-WAUKESHA-WEST ALLIS, WI (MSA) | MILWAUKEE | $287,375 | $337,168 | $407,558 | $506,495 | |
MILWAUKEE-WAUKESHA-WEST ALLIS, WI (MSA) | OZAUKEE | $287,375 | $337,168 | $407,558 | $506,495 | |
MINNEAPOLIS-ST. PAUL-BLOOMINGTON, MN-WI | PIERCE | $331,250 | $373,092 | $453,289 | $523,026 | |
MINNEAPOLIS-ST. PAUL-BLOOMINGTON, MN-WI | ST. CROIX | $331,250 | $373,092 | $453,289 | $523,026 | |
MILWAUKEE-WAUKESHA-WEST ALLIS, WI (MSA) | WASHINGTON | $287,375 | $337,168 | $407,558 | $506,495 | |
MILWAUKEE-WAUKESHA-WEST ALLIS, WI (MSA) | WAUKESHA | $287,375 | $337,168 | $407,558 | $506,495 | |
WV | HAGERSTOWN-MARTINSBURG, MD-WV (MSA) | BERKELEY | $362,500 | $408,289 | $496,053 | $572,368 |
WINCHESTER, VA-WV (MSA) | HAMPSHIRE | $475,000 | $535,000 | $650,000 | $750,000 | |
HAGERSTOWN-MARTINSBURG, MD-WV (MSA) | JEFFERSON | $477,355 | $611,117 | $738,699 | $888,158 | |
HAGERSTOWN-MARTINSBURG, MD-WV (MSA) | MORGAN | $362,500 | $408,289 | $496,053 | $572,368 | |
WY | JACKSON, WY-ID (MICRO) | TETON | $477,355 | $611,117 | $738,699 | $918,021 |
ALL OTHER AREAS | $263,368 | $337,168 | $407,558 | $506,495 |
.02 The nationwide average purchase price (for use in the housing cost/income ratio for new and existing residences) is $269,600.
Rev. Proc. 2006-17 is obsolete except as provided in section 6 of this revenue procedure.
.01 Issuers may rely on this revenue procedure to determine average area purchase price safe harbors for commitments to provide financing or issue mortgage credit certificates that are made, or (if the purchase precedes the commitment) for residences that are purchased, in the period that begins on March 8, 2007, and ends on the date as of which the safe harbors contained in section 4.01 of this revenue procedure are rendered obsolete by a new revenue procedure.
.02 Notwithstanding section 5 of this revenue procedure, issuers may continue to rely on the average area purchase price safe harbors contained in Rev. Proc. 2006-17, with respect to bonds sold, or for mortgage credit certificates issued with respect to bond authority exchanged, before April 7, 2007, if the commitments to provide financing or issue mortgage credit certificates are made on or before May 7, 2007.
.03 Except as provided in section 6.04, issuers must use the nationwide average purchase price limitation contained in this revenue procedure for commitments to provide financing or issue mortgage credit certificates that are made, or (if the purchase precedes the commitment) for residences that are purchased, in the period that begins on March 8, 2007, and ends on the date when the nationwide average purchase price limitation is rendered obsolete by a new revenue procedure.
.04 Notwithstanding sections 5 and 6.03 of this revenue procedure, issuers may continue to rely on the nationwide average purchase price set forth in Rev. Proc. 2006-17 with respect to bonds sold, or for mortgage credit certificates issued with respect to bond authority exchanged, before April 7, 2007, if the commitments to provide financing or issue mortgage credit certificates are made on or before May 7, 2007.
The collection of information contained in this revenue procedure has been reviewed and approved by the Office of Management and Budget in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3507) under control number 1545-1877.
An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless the collection of information displays a valid OMB control number.
This revenue procedure contains a collection of information requirement in section 3.03. The purpose of the collection of information is to verify the applicable FHA loan limit that issuers of qualified mortgage bonds and qualified mortgage certificates have used to calculate the average area purchase price for a given metropolitan statistical area for purposes of section 143(e) and 25(c). The collection of information is required to obtain the benefit of using revisions to FHA loan limits to determine average area purchase prices. The likely respondents are state and local governments.
The estimated total annual reporting and/or recordkeeping burden is: 15 hours.
The estimated annual burden per respondent and/or recordkeeper: 15 minutes.
The estimated number of respondents and/or recordkeepers: 60.
Books or records relating to a collection of information must be retained as long as their contents may become material in the administration of any internal revenue law. Generally tax returns and tax return information are confidential, as required by 26 U.S.C. 6103.
The principal authors of this revenue procedure are David E. White and Timothy L. Jones of the Office of Division Counsel/Associate Chief Counsel (Tax Exempt & Government Entities). For further information regarding this revenue procedure, contact David E. White at (202) 622-3980 (not a toll-free call).
In this issue of the Bulletin, the IRS is issuing temporary regulations (T.D. 9313) that amend §1.368-2T(l), which provides guidance regarding the qualification of certain transactions as reorganizations described in section 368(a)(1)(D) where no stock and/or securities of the acquiring corporation are issued and distributed in the transaction. These regulations clarify that the rules in §1.368-2T(l) are not intended to affect the qualification of related party triangular asset acquisitions as reorganizations described in section 368. These regulations affect corporations engaging in such transactions and their shareholders. The text of those regulations also serves as the text of these proposed regulations.
Written or electronic comments and requests for a public hearing must be received by May 30, 2007.
Send submissions to: CC:PA:LPD:PR (REG-157834-06), Internal Revenue Service, PO Box 7604, Ben Franklin Station, Washington, DC 20044. Submissions may be hand delivered to CC:PA:LPD:PR (REG-157834-06), Courier Desk, Internal Revenue Service, 1111 Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC, or sent electronically, via the IRS Internet site at www.irs.gov/regs or via the Federal eRulemaking Portal at www.regulations.gov (IRS REG-157834-06).
Concerning the proposed regulations, Bruce A. Decker, (202) 622-7550; concerning submission of comments, requests for a public hearing, and/or a publication and regulations specialist, Kelly Banks, (202) 622-7180.
Temporary regulations in this issue of the Bulletin amend 26 CFR part 1. The temporary regulations amend §1.368-2T(l), which provides guidance regarding the qualification of certain transactions as reorganizations described in section 368(a)(1)(D) where no stock and/or securities of the acquiring corporation are issued and distributed in the transaction. The text of those regulations also serves as the text of these proposed regulations. The preamble to the temporary regulations explains the amendments.
These regulations clarify that the rules in §1.368-2T(l) are not intended to affect the qualification of related party triangular asset acquisitions as reorganizations described in section 368.
It has been determined that this notice of proposed rulemaking is not a significant regulatory action as defined in Executive Order 12866. Therefore, a regulatory assessment is not required. It also has been determined that section 553(b) of the Administrative Procedure Act (5 U.S.C. chapter 5) does not apply to these regulations, and because the regulations do not impose a collection of information on small entities, the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. chapter 6) does not apply. Pursuant to section 7805(f) of the Internal Revenue Code, this notice of proposed rulemaking will be submitted to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small Business Administration for comment on its impact on small business.
Before these proposed regulations are adopted as final regulations, consideration will be given to any written (a signed original and eight (8) copies) or electronic comments that are submitted timely to the IRS. The IRS and Treasury Department request comments on the clarity of the proposed rules and how they can be made easier to understand. All comments will be available for public inspection and copying. A public hearing will be scheduled if requested in writing by any person that timely submits written comments. If a public hearing is scheduled, notice of the date, time, and place for the public hearing will be published in the Federal Register.
Accordingly, 26 CFR part 1 is proposed to be amended as follows:
Paragraph 1. The authority citation for part 1 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 26 U.S.C. 7805 * * *
Par. 2. Section 1.368-2 is amended by adding paragraph (l)(2)(iv) to read as follows:
* * * * *
[The text of this proposed amendment to §1.368-2(l)(2)(iv) is the same as the text of §1.368-2T(l)(2)(iv) published elsewhere in this issue of the Bulletin.
Kevin M. Brown,Deputy Commissioner for
Services and Enforcement.
The following organizations have failed to establish or have been unable to maintain their status as public charities or as operating foundations. Accordingly, grantors and contributors may not, after this date, rely on previous rulings or designations in the Cumulative List of Organizations (Publication 78), or on the presumption arising from the filing of notices under section 508(b) of the Code. This listing does not indicate that the organizations have lost their status as organizations described in section 501(c)(3), eligible to receive deductible contributions.
Former Public Charities. The following organizations (which have been treated as organizations that are not private foundations described in section 509(a) of the Code) are now classified as private foundations:
Org. Name | City | State |
---|---|---|
7 Cord Ministries, | Waco | TX |
Abundant Life Family Services, Inc., | Los Angeles | CA |
Acting Out Foundation, | Beachwood | OH |
Ada A. Grant, Inc., | Chicago | IL |
Adelante Now Foundation, | Albuquerque | NM |
Agape Mission and Community Service Group, Inc., | Birmingham | AL |
Alta-Pasa Debutante Association, | Fontana | CA |
Amateur Division of the International Log Rolling Association, | Onalaska | WI |
American Academy of Continuing Medical Education, Inc., | Skillman | NJ |
Animal Lovers for Infinity, Inc., | Boston | MA |
Anishinabe Miikana Project, Inc., | Red Lake | MN |
Association of Iu Mien, | San Jose | CA |
Better World Services, Inc., | Centreville | VA |
B.G.B.B. Foundation, Inc. (bridging Gaps and Breaking Barriers), | Nashville | TN |
Bible Mission, | La Quinta | CA |
Biobehavioral Institute of Boston, Inc., | Boston | MA |
Black Hills Coalition of Standing Rock Enrollees, | Rapid City | SD |
Burningbush Pastoral Care Services, Inc., | Plano | TX |
Center for Community Stabilization, | Rogers | AR |
Changing Directions, | Far Hills | NJ |
Chesapeake Institutes for Behavioral Research, | Glenn Allen | VA |
Chuckie Goodnight Foundation, Inc., | Brewster | KY |
Civil War Landscapes Association, | Chicago | IL |
Claudine Carew Scholarship Fund, | Williamsburg | VA |
Community Education Network, Inc., | Bethesda | MD |
Computers for Kids, Inc., | Bloomington | MN |
Concerned Black Men of Cape Cod & The Islands, Inc., | Provincetown | MA |
Cooper Foundation, | Elm City | NC |
Counseling Ministries International, Inc., | Ada | OK |
Cross Atlantic Foundation, Inc., | Lynbrook | NY |
Dedicated Helper, | Inglewood | CA |
Divine Destiny, Inc., | Chesapeake | VA |
Dry Branch Community Life Center, Inc., | Dry Branch | GA |
Dunbar Township Science Center, | Leisenring | PA |
Education Sports Plus Foundation, Inc., | Newton | NJ |
Educational Opportunities, Inc., | Chicago | IL |
Family and Youth Achievement Center, | Durham | NC |
FATA Foundation, | Coral Springs | FL |
For This Cause, | Oceano | CA |
Fort Wayne Music Fest, Inc., | Fort Wayne | IN |
Foundation in Memory of Suel, | Walnut | CA |
Friends of Rain Forests in Myannar, | Aberdeen | MD |
Front Forty Productions, Inc., | Verona | WI |
Full Gospel Ministries, Ltd., | Joshua Tree | CA |
Genesis Protected Animal Refuge, Inc., | Pikesville | MD |
Georgia Motorcyclists Association, Inc., | Atlanta | GA |
Gloary, Inc., | Delray Beach | FL |
Global Information Freedom, Inc., | Cary | NC |
Global Vision Alliance, | Orinda | CA |
Good Shepherd International Miracle Center, Inc., | Virginia Beach | VA |
Greater Hope Community Development, | Houston | TX |
Greater Rome Chamber of Commerce Foundation, | Rome | GA |
Helen E. Popa Masters in Nursing Loan Fund, | Austintown | OH |
Hellenic American Education Foundation, Inc., | Bayside | NY |
Holographic Ecology, Inc., | Santa Barbara | CA |
IGBO Union of St. Louis, Inc., | St. Louis | MO |
Incredible Dreams Childcare and Learning Center, Incorporated, | Chicago | IL |
Indo-American Social Service Partners, | Brooklyn | NY |
Inspiration Community Service Center, | Solon | OH |
Institute of Modern Test Theory, | Chicago | IL |
Intercare Housing, Inc., | Indianapolis | IN |
Interfaith Partnership for Advocacy Reconciliation, | Winston-Salem | NC |
International Terrorism Awareness Coalition, | Highstown | NJ |
Joe Stephens Foundation, | Houston | TX |
Kidron Brook Ministries, Inc., | Kernersville | NC |
Kollel Ari Yerucham, | New York | NY |
Lakeland Cardinals Booster Club, | Fox Lake | IL |
Latino Cultural Center of Napa Valley, | Napa | CA |
Lincoln Park Youth in Touch, Incorporated, | Hampton | VA |
Mahoning Valley Renaissance Institute, | Mineral Ridge | OH |
Manjui Foundation, Inc., | Baltimore | MD |
Masjidullah Economic Community Corporation of America (M.E.C.C.A.), | Philadelphia | PA |
Mending Hoop Ranch & Reserve, | Peebles | OH |
Mental Health Alliance, Inc., | Louisville | KY |
Minor League Players Institute, | Chicago | IL |
Mirabal Sister Culture and Community Center, Inc., | New York | NY |
Montana Wildlife Recovery, Inc., | Bozeman | MT |
Museo Eduardo Carillo, | Santa Cruz | CA |
Natomas Education Foundation, | Sacramento | CA |
NBBJ Training Academy, Inc., | Columbus | OH |
Nerih, Inc., | Aliquippa | PA |
Night Hawk Foundation, | Greenville | MS |
Nursing Assistance Home Care Serv, Inc., | Randallstown | MD |
Passport for Godly Ling, Inc., | Sante Fe | TX |
Piscataway Township Education Foundation, | Piscataway | NJ |
Pizza Family Ministries, | Deltona | FL |
Pneuma Ministries Community Development, Inc., | Meridianville | AL |
Polish American Leadership Initiative, | Chicago | IL |
Positive Strokes, Inc., | Norman | OK |
Quest Ministries International, | Hervey | LA |
Restore Hope, Inc., | Bronson | MI |
Ronald J. Weiss Memorial Foundation, | Lagrangeville | NY |
Self-Sufficient Families, | Los Angeles | CA |
Share the Love Center, | Simi Valley | CA |
Solutions Benefiting Life Institute, Ltd., | Sudbury | MA |
Sound Touches, | Jefferson | GA |
Southern California Indian Health Coalition, Inc., | Banning | CA |
Talamm, Inc., | Silver Spring | MD |
Thomasville Boxing Association, | Thomasville | GA |
Tower Educational Consulting Group, Inc., | Elyria | OH |
Triune Project, Inc., | Newport Beach | CA |
Turning Point for Women and Children, | Goldsboro | NC |
Underwater Learning Institute, Ltd., | Baltimore | MD |
US Chamber Foundation for Legal Reform, | Washington | DC |
Victory Community Development, Inc., | Bessemer | AL |
Willoughby Hills Lions Club Scholarship Fund, | Willoughby Hills | OH |
Wolf Point Development Corporation, | Wolf Point | MT |
Women of Vision, | Redondo Beach | CA |
If an organization listed above submits information that warrants the renewal of its classification as a public charity or as a private operating foundation, the Internal Revenue Service will issue a ruling or determination letter with the revised classification as to foundation status. Grantors and contributors may thereafter rely upon such ruling or determination letter as provided in section 1.509(a)-7 of the Income Tax Regulations. It is not the practice of the Service to announce such revised classification of foundation status in the Internal Revenue Bulletin.
The names of organizations that no longer qualify as organizations described in section 170(c)(2) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 are listed below.
Generally, the Service will not disallow deductions for contributions made to a listed organization on or before the date of announcement in the Internal Revenue Bulletin that an organization no longer qualifies. However, the Service is not precluded from disallowing a deduction for any contributions made after an organization ceases to qualify under section 170(c)(2) if the organization has not timely filed a suit for declaratory judgment under section 7428 and if the contributor (1) had knowledge of the revocation of the ruling or determination letter, (2) was aware that such revocation was imminent, or (3) was in part responsible for or was aware of the activities or omissions of the organization that brought about this revocation.
If on the other hand a suit for declaratory judgment has been timely filed, contributions from individuals and organizations described in section 170(c)(2) that are otherwise allowable will continue to be deductible. Protection under section 7428(c) would begin on March 26, 2007, and would end on the date the court first determines that the organization is not described in section 170(c)(2) as more particularly set forth in section 7428(c)(1). For individual contributors, the maximum deduction protected is $1,000, with a husband and wife treated as one contributor. This benefit is not extended to any individual, in whole or in part, for the acts or omissions of the organization that were the basis for revocation.
Org. Name | City | State |
---|---|---|
American Education Foundation International | San Francisco | CA |
Ladder 12 Firefighters Fund, Inc. | New York | NY |
Amplified describes a situation where no change is being made in a prior published position, but the prior position is being extended to apply to a variation of the fact situation set forth therein. Thus, if an earlier ruling held that a principle applied to A, and the new ruling holds that the same principle also applies to B, the earlier ruling is amplified. (Compare with modified, below).
Clarified is used in those instances where the language in a prior ruling is being made clear because the language has caused, or may cause, some confusion. It is not used where a position in a prior ruling is being changed.
Distinguished describes a situation where a ruling mentions a previously published ruling and points out an essential difference between them.
Modified is used where the substance of a previously published position is being changed. Thus, if a prior ruling held that a principle applied to A but not to B, and the new ruling holds that it applies to both A and B, the prior ruling is modified because it corrects a published position. (Compare with amplified and clarified, above).
Obsoleted describes a previously published ruling that is not considered determinative with respect to future transactions. This term is most commonly used in a ruling that lists previously published rulings that are obsoleted because of changes in laws or regulations. A ruling may also be obsoleted because the substance has been included in regulations subsequently adopted.
Revoked describes situations where the position in the previously published ruling is not correct and the correct position is being stated in a new ruling.
Superseded describes a situation where the new ruling does nothing more than restate the substance and situation of a previously published ruling (or rulings). Thus, the term is used to republish under the 1986 Code and regulations the same position published under the 1939 Code and regulations. The term is also used when it is desired to republish in a single ruling a series of situations, names, etc., that were previously published over a period of time in separate rulings. If the new ruling does more than restate the substance of a prior ruling, a combination of terms is used. For example, modified and superseded describes a situation where the substance of a previously published ruling is being changed in part and is continued without change in part and it is desired to restate the valid portion of the previously published ruling in a new ruling that is self contained. In this case, the previously published ruling is first modified and then, as modified, is superseded.
Supplemented is used in situations in which a list, such as a list of the names of countries, is published in a ruling and that list is expanded by adding further names in subsequent rulings. After the original ruling has been supplemented several times, a new ruling may be published that includes the list in the original ruling and the additions, and supersedes all prior rulings in the series.
Suspended is used in rare situations to show that the previous published rulings will not be applied pending some future action such as the issuance of new or amended regulations, the outcome of cases in litigation, or the outcome of a Service study.
Revenue rulings and revenue procedures (hereinafter referred to as “rulings”) that have an effect on previous rulings use the following defined terms to describe the effect:
The following abbreviations in current use and formerly used will appear in material published in the Bulletin.
A—Individual.
Acq.—Acquiescence.
B—Individual.
BE—Beneficiary.
BK—Bank.
B.T.A.—Board of Tax Appeals.
C—Individual.
C.B.—Cumulative Bulletin.
CFR—Code of Federal Regulations.
CI—City.
COOP—Cooperative.
Ct.D.—Court Decision.
CY—County.
D—Decedent.
DC—Dummy Corporation.
DE—Donee.
Del. Order—Delegation Order.
DISC—Domestic International Sales Corporation.
DR—Donor.
E—Estate.
EE—Employee.
E.O.—Executive Order.
ER—Employer.
ERISA—Employee Retirement Income Security Act.
EX—Executor.
F—Fiduciary.
FC—Foreign Country.
FICA—Federal Insurance Contributions Act.
FISC—Foreign International Sales Company.
FPH—Foreign Personal Holding Company.
F.R.—Federal Register.
FUTA—Federal Unemployment Tax Act.
FX—Foreign corporation.
G.C.M.—Chief Counsel’s Memorandum.
GE—Grantee.
GP—General Partner.
GR—Grantor.
IC—Insurance Company.
I.R.B.—Internal Revenue Bulletin.
LE—Lessee.
LP—Limited Partner.
LR—Lessor.
M—Minor.
Nonacq.—Nonacquiescence.
O—Organization.
P—Parent Corporation.
PHC—Personal Holding Company.
PO—Possession of the U.S.
PR—Partner.
PRS—Partnership.
PTE—Prohibited Transaction Exemption.
Pub. L.—Public Law.
REIT—Real Estate Investment Trust.
Rev. Proc.—Revenue Procedure.
Rev. Rul.—Revenue Ruling.
S—Subsidiary.
S.P.R.—Statement of Procedural Rules.
Stat.—Statutes at Large.
T—Target Corporation.
T.C.—Tax Court.
T.D. —Treasury Decision.
TFE—Transferee.
TFR—Transferor.
T.I.R.—Technical Information Release.
TP—Taxpayer.
TR—Trust.
TT—Trustee.
U.S.C.—United States Code.
X—Corporation.
Y—Corporation.
Z—Corporation.
A cumulative list of all revenue rulings, revenue procedures, Treasury decisions, etc., published in Internal Revenue Bulletins 2006-27 through 2006-52 is in Internal Revenue Bulletin 2006-52, dated December 26, 2006.
Bulletins 2007-1 through 2007-13
Announcements
Article | Issue | Link | Page |
---|---|---|---|
2007-1 | 2007-1 I.R.B. | 2007-1 | 243 |
2007-2 | 2007-2 I.R.B. | 2007-2 | 263 |
2007-3 | 2007-4 I.R.B. | 2007-4 | 376 |
2007-4 | 2007-7 I.R.B. | 2007-7 | 518 |
2007-5 | 2007-4 I.R.B. | 2007-4 | 376 |
2007-6 | 2007-4 I.R.B. | 2007-4 | 376 |
2007-7 | 2007-4 I.R.B. | 2007-4 | 377 |
2007-8 | 2007-5 I.R.B. | 2007-5 | 416 |
2007-9 | 2007-5 I.R.B. | 2007-5 | 417 |
2007-10 | 2007-6 I.R.B. | 2007-6 | 464 |
2007-11 | 2007-6 I.R.B. | 2007-6 | 464 |
2007-12 | 2007-6 I.R.B. | 2007-6 | 465 |
2007-13 | 2007-7 I.R.B. | 2007-7 | 519 |
2007-14 | 2007-7 I.R.B. | 2007-7 | 519 |
2007-15 | 2007-8 I.R.B. | 2007-8 | 596 |
2007-16 | 2007-8 I.R.B. | 2007-8 | 597 |
2007-17 | 2007-8 I.R.B. | 2007-8 | 597 |
2007-18 | 2007-9 I.R.B. | 2007-9 | 625 |
2007-19 | 2007-7 I.R.B. | 2007-7 | 521 |
2007-20 | 2007-8 I.R.B. | 2007-8 | 599 |
2007-21 | 2007-9 I.R.B. | 2007-9 | 630 |
2007-22 | 2007-9 I.R.B. | 2007-9 | 631 |
2007-23 | 2007-10 I.R.B. | 2007-10 | 665 |
2007-24 | 2007-10 I.R.B. | 2007-10 | 681 |
2007-25 | 2007-10 I.R.B. | 2007-10 | 682 |
2007-26 | 2007-10 I.R.B. | 2007-10 | 682 |
2007-27 | 2007-11 I.R.B. | 2007-11 | 733 |
2007-28 | 2007-10 I.R.B. | 2007-10 | 683 |
2007-29 | 2007-11 I.R.B. | 2007-11 | 733 |
2007-30 | 2007-11 I.R.B. | 2007-11 | 734 |
2007-31 | 2007-12 I.R.B. | 2007-12 | 769 |
2007-32 | 2007-11 I.R.B. | 2007-11 | 734 |
2007-33 | 2007-13 I.R.B. | 2007-13 | |
2007-34 | 2007-13 I.R.B. | 2007-13 |
Notices
Article | Issue | Link | Page |
---|---|---|---|
2007-1 | 2007-2 I.R.B. | 2007-2 | 254 |
2007-2 | 2007-2 I.R.B. | 2007-2 | 254 |
2007-3 | 2007-2 I.R.B. | 2007-2 | 255 |
2007-4 | 2007-2 I.R.B. | 2007-2 | 260 |
2007-5 | 2007-3 I.R.B. | 2007-3 | 269 |
2007-6 | 2007-3 I.R.B. | 2007-3 | 272 |
2007-7 | 2007-5 I.R.B. | 2007-5 | 395 |
2007-8 | 2007-3 I.R.B. | 2007-3 | 276 |
2007-9 | 2007-5 I.R.B. | 2007-5 | 401 |
2007-10 | 2007-4 I.R.B. | 2007-4 | 354 |
2007-11 | 2007-5 I.R.B. | 2007-5 | 405 |
2007-12 | 2007-5 I.R.B. | 2007-5 | 409 |
2007-13 | 2007-5 I.R.B. | 2007-5 | 410 |
2007-14 | 2007-7 I.R.B. | 2007-7 | 501 |
2007-15 | 2007-7 I.R.B. | 2007-7 | 503 |
2007-16 | 2007-8 I.R.B. | 2007-8 | 536 |
2007-17 | 2007-12 I.R.B. | 2007-12 | 748 |
2007-18 | 2007-9 I.R.B. | 2007-9 | 608 |
2007-19 | 2007-11 I.R.B. | 2007-11 | 689 |
2007-20 | 2007-9 I.R.B. | 2007-9 | 610 |
2007-21 | 2007-9 I.R.B. | 2007-9 | 611 |
2007-22 | 2007-10 I.R.B. | 2007-10 | 670 |
2007-23 | 2007-11 I.R.B. | 2007-11 | 690 |
2007-24 | 2007-12 I.R.B. | 2007-12 | 750 |
2007-25 | 2007-12 I.R.B. | 2007-12 | 760 |
2007-27 | 2007-13 I.R.B. | 2007-13 |
Proposed Regulations
Article | Issue | Link | Page |
---|---|---|---|
100841-97 | 2007-12 I.R.B. | 2007-12 | 763 |
157711-02 | 2007-8 I.R.B. | 2007-8 | 537 |
159444-04 | 2007-9 I.R.B. | 2007-9 | 618 |
115403-05 | 2007-12 I.R.B. | 2007-12 | 767 |
152043-05 | 2007-2 I.R.B. | 2007-2 | 263 |
161919-05 | 2007-6 I.R.B. | 2007-6 | 463 |
125632-06 | 2007-5 I.R.B. | 2007-5 | 415 |
147144-06 | 2007-10 I.R.B. | 2007-10 | 680 |
157834-06 | 2007-13 I.R.B. | 2007-13 |
Revenue Procedures
Article | Issue | Link | Page |
---|---|---|---|
2007-1 | 2007-1 I.R.B. | 2007-1 | 1 |
2007-2 | 2007-1 I.R.B. | 2007-1 | 88 |
2007-3 | 2007-1 I.R.B. | 2007-1 | 108 |
2007-4 | 2007-1 I.R.B. | 2007-1 | 118 |
2007-5 | 2007-1 I.R.B. | 2007-1 | 161 |
2007-6 | 2007-1 I.R.B. | 2007-1 | 189 |
2007-7 | 2007-1 I.R.B. | 2007-1 | 227 |
2007-8 | 2007-1 I.R.B. | 2007-1 | 230 |
2007-9 | 2007-3 I.R.B. | 2007-3 | 278 |
2007-10 | 2007-3 I.R.B. | 2007-3 | 289 |
2007-11 | 2007-2 I.R.B. | 2007-2 | 261 |
2007-12 | 2007-4 I.R.B. | 2007-4 | 354 |
2007-13 | 2007-3 I.R.B. | 2007-3 | 295 |
2007-14 | 2007-4 I.R.B. | 2007-4 | 357 |
2007-15 | 2007-3 I.R.B. | 2007-3 | 300 |
2007-16 | 2007-4 I.R.B. | 2007-4 | 358 |
2007-17 | 2007-4 I.R.B. | 2007-4 | 368 |
2007-18 | 2007-5 I.R.B. | 2007-5 | 413 |
2007-19 | 2007-7 I.R.B. | 2007-7 | 515 |
2007-20 | 2007-7 I.R.B. | 2007-7 | 517 |
2007-21 | 2007-9 I.R.B. | 2007-9 | 613 |
2007-22 | 2007-10 I.R.B. | 2007-10 | 675 |
2007-23 | 2007-10 I.R.B. | 2007-10 | 675 |
2007-24 | 2007-11 I.R.B. | 2007-11 | 692 |
2007-25 | 2007-12 I.R.B. | 2007-12 | 761 |
2007-26 | 2007-13 I.R.B. | 2007-13 |
Revenue Rulings
Article | Issue | Link | Page |
---|---|---|---|
2007-1 | 2007-3 I.R.B. | 2007-3 | 265 |
2007-2 | 2007-3 I.R.B. | 2007-3 | 266 |
2007-3 | 2007-4 I.R.B. | 2007-4 | 350 |
2007-4 | 2007-4 I.R.B. | 2007-4 | 351 |
2007-5 | 2007-5 I.R.B. | 2007-5 | 378 |
2007-6 | 2007-5 I.R.B. | 2007-5 | 393 |
2007-7 | 2007-7 I.R.B. | 2007-7 | 468 |
2007-8 | 2007-7 I.R.B. | 2007-7 | 469 |
2007-9 | 2007-6 I.R.B. | 2007-6 | 422 |
2007-10 | 2007-10 I.R.B. | 2007-10 | 660 |
2007-11 | 2007-9 I.R.B. | 2007-9 | 606 |
2007-12 | 2007-11 I.R.B. | 2007-11 | 685 |
2007-13 | 2007-11 I.R.B. | 2007-11 | 684 |
2007-14 | 2007-12 I.R.B. | 2007-12 | 747 |
2007-15 | 2007-11 I.R.B. | 2007-11 | 687 |
2007-16 | 2007-13 I.R.B. | 2007-13 | |
2007-17 | 2007-13 I.R.B. | 2007-13 | |
2007-18 | 2007-13 I.R.B. | 2007-13 |
Treasury Decisions
Article | Issue | Link | Page |
---|---|---|---|
9298 | 2007-6 I.R.B. | 2007-6 | 434 |
9299 | 2007-6 I.R.B. | 2007-6 | 460 |
9300 | 2007-2 I.R.B. | 2007-2 | 246 |
9301 | 2007-2 I.R.B. | 2007-2 | 244 |
9302 | 2007-5 I.R.B. | 2007-5 | 382 |
9303 | 2007-5 I.R.B. | 2007-5 | 379 |
9304 | 2007-6 I.R.B. | 2007-6 | 423 |
9305 | 2007-7 I.R.B. | 2007-7 | 479 |
9306 | 2007-6 I.R.B. | 2007-6 | 420 |
9307 | 2007-7 I.R.B. | 2007-7 | 470 |
9308 | 2007-8 I.R.B. | 2007-8 | 523 |
9309 | 2007-7 I.R.B. | 2007-7 | 497 |
9310 | 2007-9 I.R.B. | 2007-9 | 601 |
9311 | 2007-10 I.R.B. | 2007-10 | 635 |
9312 | 2007-12 I.R.B. | 2007-12 | 736 |
9313 | 2007-13 I.R.B. | 2007-13 |
A cumulative list of current actions on previously published items in Internal Revenue Bulletins 2006-27 through 2006-52 is in Internal Revenue Bulletin 2006-52, dated December 26, 2006.
Bulletins 2007-1 through 2007-13
Notices
Old Article | Action | New Article | Issue | Link | Page |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2002-45 | Modified by | Notice 2007-22 | 2007-10 I.R.B. | 2007-10 | 670 |
2005-29 | Modified and superseded by | Notice 2007-4 | 2007-2 I.R.B. | 2007-2 | 260 |
2005-86 | Modified by | Notice 2007-22 | 2007-10 I.R.B. | 2007-10 | 670 |
2006-2 | Modified and superseded by | Notice 2007-4 | 2007-2 I.R.B. | 2007-2 | 260 |
2006-50 | Amplified, clarified, and modified by | Notice 2007-11 | 2007-5 I.R.B. | 2007-5 | 405 |
2006-87 | Modified and supplemented by | Notice 2007-25 | 2007-12 I.R.B. | 2007-12 | 760 |
Proposed Regulations
Old Article | Action | New Article | Issue | Link | Page |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
208270-86 | Corrected by | Ann. 2007-4 | 2007-7 I.R.B. | 2007-7 | 518 |
121509-00 | Corrected by | Ann. 2007-17 | 2007-8 I.R.B. | 2007-8 | 597 |
141901-05 | Corrected by | Ann. 2007-7 | 2007-4 I.R.B. | 2007-4 | 377 |
142270-05 | Corrected by | Ann. 2007-2 | 2007-2 I.R.B. | 2007-2 | 263 |
125632-06 | Corrected by | Ann. 2007-26 | 2007-10 I.R.B. | 2007-10 | 682 |
127819-06 | Corrected by | Ann. 2007-5 | 2007-4 I.R.B. | 2007-4 | 376 |
136806-06 | Corrected by | Ann. 2007-6 | 2007-4 I.R.B. | 2007-4 | 376 |
136806-06 | Hearing cancelled by | Ann. 2007-19 | 2007-7 I.R.B. | 2007-7 | 521 |
Revenue Procedures
Old Article | Action | New Article | Issue | Link | Page |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
98-20 | Superseded by | Rev. Proc. 2007-12 | 2007-4 I.R.B. | 2007-4 | 354 |
2000-38 | Modified by | Rev. Proc. 2007-16 | 2007-4 I.R.B. | 2007-4 | 358 |
2000-50 | Modified by | Rev. Proc. 2007-16 | 2007-4 I.R.B. | 2007-4 | 358 |
2001-42 | Modified and amplified by | Rev. Proc. 2007-19 | 2007-7 I.R.B. | 2007-7 | 515 |
2002-9 | Modified and amplified by | Rev. Proc. 2007-14 | 2007-4 I.R.B. | 2007-4 | 357 |
2002-9 | Modified by | Rev. Proc. 2007-16 | 2007-4 I.R.B. | 2007-4 | 358 |
2004-11 | Superseded by | Rev. Proc. 2007-16 | 2007-4 I.R.B. | 2007-4 | 358 |
2004-65 | Modified and superseded by | Rev. Proc. 2007-20 | 2007-7 I.R.B. | 2007-7 | 517 |
2005-12 | Superseded by | Rev. Proc. 2007-17 | 2007-4 I.R.B. | 2007-4 | 368 |
2005-51 | Amplified by | Rev. Proc. 2007-25 | 2007-12 I.R.B. | 2007-12 | 761 |
2005-69 | Superseded by | Rev. Proc. 2007-15 | 2007-3 I.R.B. | 2007-3 | 300 |
2005-74 | Superseded by | Rev. Proc. 2007-24 | 2007-11 I.R.B. | 2007-11 | 692 |
2006-1 | Superseded by | Rev. Proc. 2007-1 | 2007-1 I.R.B. | 2007-1 | 1 |
2006-2 | Superseded by | Rev. Proc. 2007-2 | 2007-1 I.R.B. | 2007-1 | 88 |
2006-3 | Superseded by | Rev. Proc. 2007-3 | 2007-1 I.R.B. | 2007-1 | 108 |
2006-4 | Superseded by | Rev. Proc. 2007-4 | 2007-1 I.R.B. | 2007-1 | 118 |
2006-5 | Superseded by | Rev. Proc. 2007-5 | 2007-1 I.R.B. | 2007-1 | 161 |
2006-6 | Superseded by | Rev. Proc. 2007-6 | 2007-1 I.R.B. | 2007-1 | 189 |
2006-7 | Superseded by | Rev. Proc. 2007-7 | 2007-1 I.R.B. | 2007-1 | 227 |
2006-8 | Superseded by | Rev. Proc. 2007-8 | 2007-1 I.R.B. | 2007-1 | 230 |
2006-17 | Obsoleted in part by | Rev. Proc. 2007-26 | 2007-13 I.R.B. | 2007-13 | |
2006-35 | Modified by | Rev. Proc. 2007-22 | 2007-10 I.R.B. | 2007-10 | 675 |
Revenue Rulings
Old Article | Action | New Article | Issue | Link | Page |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
54-19 | Obsoleted in part by | Rev. Rul. 2007-14 | 2007-12 I.R.B. | 2007-12 | 747 |
55-132 | Obsoleted by | Rev. Rul. 2007-14 | 2007-12 I.R.B. | 2007-12 | 747 |
56-462 | Obsoleted by | Rev. Rul. 2007-14 | 2007-12 I.R.B. | 2007-12 | 747 |
56-518 | Obsoleted by | Rev. Rul. 2007-14 | 2007-12 I.R.B. | 2007-12 | 747 |
57-505 | Obsoleted by | Rev. Rul. 2007-14 | 2007-12 I.R.B. | 2007-12 | 747 |
58-370 | Obsoleted by | Rev. Rul. 2007-14 | 2007-12 I.R.B. | 2007-12 | 747 |
58-500 | Obsoleted by | Rev. Rul. 2007-14 | 2007-12 I.R.B. | 2007-12 | 747 |
69-141 | Modified by | Notice 2007-22 | 2007-10 I.R.B. | 2007-10 | 670 |
69-212 | Obsoleted by | Rev. Rul. 2007-14 | 2007-12 I.R.B. | 2007-12 | 747 |
69-587 | Revoked by | Rev. Rul. 2007-12 | 2007-11 I.R.B. | 2007-11 | 685 |
71-477 | Obsoleted by | Rev. Rul. 2007-14 | 2007-12 I.R.B. | 2007-12 | 747 |
75-161 | Obsoleted by | Rev. Rul. 2007-8 | 2007-7 I.R.B. | 2007-7 | 469 |
76-188 | Obsoleted by | Rev. Rul. 2007-8 | 2007-7 I.R.B. | 2007-7 | 469 |
78-330 | Modified by | Rev. Rul. 2007-8 | 2007-7 I.R.B. | 2007-7 | 469 |
81-225 | Clarified and amplified by | Rev. Rul. 2007-7 | 2007-7 I.R.B. | 2007-7 | 468 |
92-19 | Supplemented in part by | Rev. Rul. 2007-10 | 2007-10 I.R.B. | 2007-10 | 660 |
96-51 | Amplified by | Rev. Rul. 2007-12 | 2007-11 I.R.B. | 2007-11 | 685 |
2002-41 | Modified by | Notice 2007-22 | 2007-10 I.R.B. | 2007-10 | 670 |
2003-43 | Modified by | Notice 2007-2 | 2007-2 I.R.B. | 2007-2 | 254 |
2003-92 | Clarified and amplified by | Rev. Rul. 2007-7 | 2007-7 I.R.B. | 2007-7 | 468 |
2003-102 | Modified by | Notice 2007-22 | 2007-10 I.R.B. | 2007-10 | 670 |
2005-24 | Modified by | Notice 2007-22 | 2007-10 I.R.B. | 2007-10 | 670 |
2005-76 | Supplemented and superseded by | Rev. Rul. 2007-4 | 2007-4 I.R.B. | 2007-4 | 351 |
2006-36 | Modified by | Notice 2007-22 | 2007-10 I.R.B. | 2007-10 | 670 |
Treasury Decisions
Old Article | Action | New Article | Issue | Link | Page |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
9263 | Corrected by | Ann. 2007-22 | 2007-9 I.R.B. | 2007-9 | 631 |
9276 | Corrected by | Ann. 2007-20 | 2007-8 I.R.B. | 2007-8 | 599 |
9276 | Corrected by | Ann. 2007-21 | 2007-9 I.R.B. | 2007-9 | 630 |
9278 | Corrected by | Ann. 2007-9 | 2007-5 I.R.B. | 2007-5 | 417 |
9278 | Corrected by | Ann. 2007-10 | 2007-6 I.R.B. | 2007-6 | 464 |
9286 | Corrected by | Ann. 2007-8 | 2007-5 I.R.B. | 2007-5 | 416 |
9298 | Corrected by | Ann. 2007-32 | 2007-11 I.R.B. | 2007-11 | 734 |
9303 | Corrected by | Ann. 2007-25 | 2007-10 I.R.B. | 2007-10 | 682 |
The Introduction at the beginning of this issue describes the purpose and content of this publication. The weekly Internal Revenue Bulletin is sold on a yearly subscription basis by the Superintendent of Documents. Current subscribers are notified by the Superintendent of Documents when their subscriptions must be renewed.
The contents of this weekly Bulletin are consolidated semiannually into a permanent, indexed, Cumulative Bulletin. These are sold on a single copy basis and are not included as part of the subscription to the Internal Revenue Bulletin. Subscribers to the weekly Bulletin are notified when copies of the Cumulative Bulletin are available. Certain issues of Cumulative Bulletins are out of print and are not available. Persons desiring available Cumulative Bulletins, which are listed on the reverse, may purchase them from the Superintendent of Documents.
You may view the Internal Revenue Bulletin on the Internet at www.irs.gov. Under information for: select Businesses. Under related topics, select More Topics. Then select Internal Revenue Bulletins.
Internal Revenue Bulletins are available annually as part of Publication 1796 (Tax Products CD-ROM). The CD-ROM can be purchased from National Technical Information Service (NTIS) on the Internet at www.irs.gov/cdorders (discount for online orders) or by calling 1-877-233-6767. The first release is available in mid-December and the final release is available in late January.
Check the publications and/or subscription(s) desired on the reverse, complete the order blank, enclose the proper remittance, detach entire page, and mail to the
P.O. Box 371954, Pittsburgh PA, 15250-7954.Please allow two to six weeks, plus mailing time, for delivery.
If you have comments concerning the format or production of the Internal Revenue Bulletin or suggestions for improving it, we would be pleased to hear from you. You can e-mail us your suggestions or comments through the IRS Internet Home Page (www.irs.gov) or write to the
IRS Bulletin Unit, SE:W:CAR:MP:T:T:SP, Washington, DC 20224