Internal Revenue Bulletin: 2026-22
May 26, 2026
These synopses are intended only as aids to the reader in identifying the subject matter covered. They may not be relied upon as authoritative interpretations.
This Revenue Procedure provides issuers of qualified mortgage bonds and mortgage credit certificates with (1) the nationwide average purchase price for residences located in the United States, and (2) the average area purchase price safe harbors for residences located in statistical areas in each state, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, the Northern Mariana Islands, American Samoa, the Virgin Islands, and Guam.
26 CFR 601.601: Rules and Regulations (Also: Part 1, §§ 25, 143, 6a.103A-1(b)(4), 6a.103A-2(f)(5))
Interest rates: underpayments and overpayments. The rates for interest determined under Section 6621 of the code for the calendar quarter beginning July 1, 2026, will be 7 percent for overpayments (6 percent in the case of a corporation), 7 percent for underpayments, and 9 percent for large corporate underpayments. The rate of interest paid on the portion of a corporate overpayment exceeding $10,000 will be 4.5 percent.
26 CFR 301.6621-1: Interest rate.
This document contains final regulations providing that amounts paid to a member of an Indian Tribe as remuneration for services performed in a fishing rights-related activity may be treated as compensation for purposes of applying the limits on qualified retirement plan benefits and contributions. These regulations affect participants who perform fishing rights-related activities and their beneficiaries, and sponsors and administrators of Tribal plans.
1.415(a)-1(g)(5); 1.415(c)-2(g)(9)
This notice publishes the inflation adjustment factor for the carbon oxide sequestration credit under § 45Q for calendar year 2026. The inflation adjustment factor is used to determine the amount of the credit allowable under § 45Q for taxpayers that make an election under § 45Q(b)(3) to have the dollar amounts applicable under § 45Q(a)(1) or (2) apply.
This notice publishes the reference price under § 45K(d)(2)(C) of the Internal Revenue Code for calendar year 2025. The reference price applies in determining the amount of the enhanced oil recovery credit under § 43, the marginal well production credit under § 45I, and the percentage depletion in case of oil and natural gas produced from marginal properties under § 613A.
This revenue procedure establishes a significant issue ruling program to allow taxpayers to request rulings on one or more issues that (1) are solely under the jurisdiction of the Associate Chief Counsel (Corporate), (2) are significant, and (3) involve the tax consequences or characterization of a transaction (or part of a transaction) that is described in § 332, 351, 355, 368, or 1036. Rev. Proc. 2026-1, 2026-1 I.R.B. 1, and Rev. Proc. 2026-3, 2026-1 I.R.B. 143, are modified and amplified.
26 CFR 601.201: Rulings and determination letters.
This revenue procedure provides indexing adjustments for the applicable dollar amounts under section 4980H(c)(1) and (b)(1) of the Internal Revenue Code. These indexed amounts are used to calculate the employer shared responsibility payments under section 4980H(a) and (b)(1), respectively.
26 CFR 601.601: Rules and Regulations. (Also Part I, §§ 4980H; 54.4980H)
Provide America’s taxpayers top-quality service by helping them understand and meet their tax responsibilities and enforce the law with integrity and fairness to all.
The Internal Revenue Bulletin is the authoritative instrument of the Commissioner of Internal Revenue for announcing official rulings and procedures of the Internal Revenue Service and for publishing Treasury Decisions, Executive Orders, Tax Conventions, legislation, court decisions, and other items of general interest. It is published weekly.
It is the policy of the Service to publish in the Bulletin all substantive rulings necessary to promote a uniform application of the tax laws, including all rulings that supersede, revoke, modify, or amend any of those previously published in the Bulletin. All published rulings apply retroactively unless otherwise indicated. Procedures relating solely to matters of internal management are not published; however, statements of internal practices and procedures that affect the rights and duties of taxpayers are published.
Revenue rulings represent the conclusions of the Service on the application of the law to the pivotal facts stated in the revenue ruling. In those based on positions taken in rulings to taxpayers or technical advice to Service field offices, identifying details and information of a confidential nature are deleted to prevent unwarranted invasions of privacy and to comply with statutory requirements.
Rulings and procedures reported in the Bulletin do not have the force and effect of Treasury Department Regulations, but they may be used as precedents. Unpublished rulings will not be relied on, used, or cited as precedents by Service personnel in the disposition of other cases. In applying published rulings and procedures, the effect of subsequent legislation, regulations, court decisions, rulings, and procedures must be considered, and Service personnel and others concerned are cautioned against reaching the same conclusions in other cases unless the facts and circumstances are substantially the same.
The Bulletin is divided into four parts as follows:
Part I.—1986 Code. This part includes rulings and decisions based on provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986.
Part II.—Treaties and Tax Legislation. This part is divided into two subparts as follows: Subpart A, Tax Conventions and Other Related Items, and Subpart B, Legislation and Related Committee Reports.
Part III.—Administrative, Procedural, and Miscellaneous. To the extent practicable, pertinent cross references to these subjects are contained in the other Parts and Subparts. Also included in this part are Bank Secrecy Act Administrative Rulings. Bank Secrecy Act Administrative Rulings are issued by the Department of the Treasury’s Office of the Assistant Secretary (Enforcement).
Part IV.—Items of General Interest. This part includes notices of proposed rulemakings, disbarment and suspension lists, and announcements.
The last Bulletin for each month includes a cumulative index for the matters published during the preceding months. These monthly indexes are cumulated on a semiannual basis, and are published in the last Bulletin of each semiannual period.
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY Internal Revenue Service 26 CFR Part 1
Treatment of Income from Indian Fishing Rights-Related Activity as Compensation
AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.
ACTION: Final Regulations.
SUMMARY: This document contains final regulations providing that amounts paid to a member of an Indian Tribe as remuneration for services performed in a fishing rights-related activity may be treated as compensation for purposes of applying the limits on qualified retirement plan benefits and contributions. These regulations affect participants, beneficiaries, sponsors, and administrators of Tribal plans.
DATES: Effective Date: These regulations are effective on May 4, 2026.
Applicability Date: For date of applicability, see §1.415(a)-1(g)(5).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jamie Dvoretzky at (202) 317-4102, or Pamela Kinard at (202) 317-6000 (not toll-free numbers).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
This Treasury Decision contains final regulations that amend the Income Tax Regulations (26 CFR part 1) under section 415, related to the definition of the term “compensation” for purposes of contribution and benefit limits applicable to qualified retirement plans. These final regulations are issued under the authority granted by section 415(j) of the Internal Revenue Code (Code), which authorizes the Secretary of the Treasury or his delegate (Secretary) to prescribe such regulations as may be necessary to carry out the purposes of section 415. These final regulations are also issued under the authority granted by section 7805(a), which authorizes the Secretary to prescribe all needful rules and regulations for the enforcement of the Code.
This document contains amendments to regulations under section 415 of the Code, which generally imposes limitations on the annual amount that a qualified retirement plan may provide, with respect to a participant, in either benefit payments or in contributions and other additions to the plan. These limitations generally are based on a participant’s compensation. Section 415(c)(3) provides that the term “participant’s compensation” means the compensation of the participant from the employer for the year.
Section 1.415(c)-2(a) of the Income Tax Regulations generally provides that compensation from the employer within the meaning of section 415(c)(3) includes all items of remuneration described in §1.415(c)-2(b) to the extent that the amounts are includible in gross income, but excludes the items of remuneration described in §1.415(c)-2(c), such as contributions made by an employer to a plan of deferred compensation to the extent that the contributions are not includible in the gross income of the employee for the taxable year in which contributed.
Section 7873(a)(1) provides that no tax shall be imposed on income derived from a fishing rights-related activity of an Indian tribe by (A) a member of the Indian tribe directly or through a qualified Indian entity, or (B) a qualified Indian entity. Section 7873(a)(2) provides that no employment tax shall be imposed on remuneration paid for services performed in a fishing rights-related activity of an Indian tribe by a member of such tribe for another member of such tribe or for a qualified Indian entity.
On November 15, 2013, proposed regulations under section 415 were published in the Federal Register (78 FR 68780). The proposed regulations would provide that income described in section 7873(a) (“fishing rights-related income”) is included in the definition of compensation under section 415. Specifically, the proposed regulations would provide that amounts paid to a member of an Indian tribe as remuneration for services performed in a fishing rights-related activity (as defined in section 7873(b)(1)) do not fail to be treated as compensation under §1.415(c)-2(b)(1) and (b)(2) (and are not excluded from the definition of compensation pursuant to §1.415(c)-2(c)(4)) merely because those amounts are not subject to income tax or employment taxes as a result of section 7873(a)(1) and (a)(2). Thus, the determination of whether an amount constitutes wages, salaries, or earned income for purposes of §1.415(c)-2(b)(1) or (b)(2) is made without regard to the exemption from income tax under section 7873(a)(1) or employment tax under section 7873(a)(2). In addition, by permitting fishing rights-related income to be treated as wages, salaries, or earned income under §1.415(c)-2(b)(1) and (b)(2), plans that accept contributions of fishing rights-related income would not be precluded from utilizing the safe harbor definitions of compensation under §1.415(c)-2(d)(2) and (d)(3).
Written comments on the proposed regulations were received and considered. The Department of the Treasury (Treasury Department) and the IRS did not receive any requests for a public hearing to address the proposed regulations, and, accordingly, no hearing was held. The Treasury Department held a Tribal consultation on this proposed rule on December 17, 2013. Additionally, on August 22, 2024, the Treasury Department met with the Treasury Tribal Advisory Committee, Subcommittee on Parity and Reform and received additional feedback on the proposed regulations. After consideration of the comments received, the proposed regulations are adopted by this Treasury decision without material modification.
A. Treatment of Fishing Rights-Related Income as Compensation under Section 415
The proposed regulations were issued primarily in response to requests from the Tribal community that the Treasury Department and the IRS address whether contributions can be made to qualified retirement plans based on fishing rights-related income. Under the proposed regulations, fishing rights-related income would not fail to be treated as compensation under §1.415(c)-2(b)(1) and (b)(2) (and is not excluded from the definition of compensation pursuant to §1.415(c)-2(c)(4)) merely because those amounts are not subject to income tax or employment tax as a result of section 7873(a)(1) or (a)(2).
Commenters generally reacted favorably to this proposed rule, stating that the proposed regulations provided much needed clarity on how plans should treat fishing rights-related income paid to employees subject to section 7873 (Tribal employees) under section 415. The Treasury Department and the IRS also received comments stating that additional guidance is needed with respect to a variety of issues relating to fishing rights-related income in retirement plans. Many of these issues are outside the scope of these regulations, which are modifying the definition of compensation for purposes of section 415, and so the text of the final regulations does not address them. However, this preamble (under the headings “Taxation of Distributions,” “Treating Contributions as Roth Contributions,” and “Self-Employed Tribal Members” in this Summary of Comments and Explanation of Provisions) provides clarifying information relating to many of these issues.
B. Taxation of Distributions
The preamble to the proposed regulations requested comments regarding the taxation of qualified plan distributions attributable to contributions based on fishing rights-related income, and the application of section 72(f)(2)1 to such distributions. All of the comments received requested that distributions attributable to contributions based on fishing rights-related income should not be taxable to a Tribal employee.
Several of the commenters referred to Hall v. Commissioner, 76 T.C.M. 473 (1998), in which the petitioner was a full-time employee in a Tribal fish hatchery who received a choice between an employer contribution to a retirement account or an employer contribution to a health plan. In 1992, the petitioner elected the retirement benefit and the employer contributed a monthly amount to an individual retirement account (IRA). That same year, the petitioner received early distributions from the IRA attributable to those employer contributions and to income earned in the IRA. The Tax Court generally found that, under section 72 (as modified by section 408(d)(1) and (2)), the amount of the distributions attributable to contributions based on fishing rights-related income represents a nontaxable return of his investment in the contract, but added that the amount of distributions attributable to the earnings on the IRA contributions represents accrued income that is taxable to the petitioner.
In response to the requests to clarify the taxation of qualified plan distributions attributable to contributions based on fishing rights-related income, the Treasury Department and the IRS have determined that the holding in Hall v. Commissioner should apply to these distributions. Thus, consistent with Hall, any contribution to a qualified retirement plan that is attributable to remuneration for services performed by a Tribal employee in a fishing rights-related activity is treated as investment in the contract for a plan participant under the rules of section 72(f)(2). Therefore, any distribution of such amounts is nontaxable to the participant. However, also consistent with Hall, the amount of the distribution attributable to earnings on those contributions is taxable.
Another commenter raised an issue regarding the ordering for determining the taxable and nontaxable amounts of a qualified retirement plan distribution. Referring to qualified retirement plan distributions attributable to fishing rights-related income, this commenter suggested that plan participants be allowed to elect the order in which the qualified retirement plan distributions are made so that the nontaxable amounts could be received first. This suggestion is not adopted because it is inconsistent with the basis recovery rules in section 72.2 Tribal employees will have investment in the contract on contributions to the plan attributable to fishing rights-related income, and thus the general basis recovery rules of section 72 will apply.
The Treasury Department and the IRS also received comments concerning the treatment of earnings on contributions attributable to fishing rights-related income and the treatment of employer matching and profit-sharing contributions related to contributions attributable to fishing rights-related income. As explained in the preceding paragraph, section 72 provides basis recovery rules for determining the taxable and nontaxable portions of a distribution. Section 72(f) applies to amounts contributed by the employer and does not distinguish employer matching or employer profit-sharing contributions from employee elective deferrals (which are treated as employer contributions pursuant to section 402(e)(3)). Therefore, section 72(f)(2) applies not only to employee elective deferrals but also to employer matching and employer profit-sharing contributions attributable to remuneration for services performed by a Tribal employee in a fishing rights-related activity. As explained in Hall v. Commissioner, however, section 72(f)(2) does not apply to earnings. Therefore, qualified retirement plan distributions attributable to the earnings on contributions based on fishing rights-related income generally will be taxable to the participant and the basis recovery rules of section 72 will apply in determining the portion of a distribution that is includible in income.
C. Treating Contributions as Roth Contributions
One commenter suggested that guidance be provided to allow a qualified retirement plan to treat contributions attributable to fishing rights-related income as either Roth contributions or after-tax contributions. The commenter added that the guidance could provide that, if the plan permits participants to make Roth contributions, then the employee’s contributions attributable to fishing rights-related income would be treated as Roth contributions. If the plan does not provide for Roth contributions, then these contributions would be treated as after-tax contributions.
Section 1.401(k)-1(f)(2) provides that if an elective contribution would not have been includible in gross income if the amount had been paid directly to the employee (rather than being subject to a cash or deferred election), the elective contribution is nevertheless permitted to be a designated Roth contribution, provided the employee is entitled to treat the amount as an investment in the contract pursuant to section 72(f)(2). As previously stated in this preamble under the heading “Taxation of Distributions,” any contributions attributable to remuneration for services performed in a fishing rights-related activity are treated as investment in the contract for the plan participant under the rules of section 72(f)(2). Therefore, contributions attributable to fishing rights-related income are permitted to be designated Roth contributions under a qualified retirement plan that permits participants to make those contributions.
D. Self-Employed Tribal Members
Two commenters asked about the retirement plan options for Tribal members who earn fishing rights-related income but who may not be employed by an Indian tribe. Section 401(a) provides that a plan of an employer is a qualified plan only if it is created or organized for the exclusive benefit of the employer’s employees or their beneficiaries. For these purposes, whether an individual is an employee of the employer maintaining a plan is generally determined under common law principles. See Nationwide Mutual Insurance Co. v. Darden, 503 U.S. 318 (1992). Self-employed individuals generally may not participate in a qualified retirement plan sponsored by another employer. Moreover, whether an individual earns fishing-rights related income is not determinative of whether that individual is an employee. However, an individual who is self-employed under section 401(c)(1) may nevertheless maintain his or her own qualified retirement plan, such as a section 401(k) plan.
E. Additional Comments
Commenters also requested guidance on several other issues, including guidance permitting rollover of contributions attributable to fishing rights-related income from a nonqualified plan to a qualified plan, guidance permitting Tribal employers to take retroactive action to permit Tribal employees to contribute fishing rights-related income to a qualified plan, and guidance on testing for contributions attributable to fishing rights-related income. These comments are all beyond the scope of these regulations and, in certain cases, the requested guidance may not be permissible under the Code (for example, rollover of amounts from a nonqualified plan into a qualified plan). However, the Treasury Department and IRS will continue to review comments that are beyond the scope of these regulations and consider if any further guidance is needed. If additional guidance is needed, the Treasury Department and the IRS will conduct Tribal consultation pursuant to Executive Order 13175.
OMB’s Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs has determined that this regulation is not significant and is not subject to review under section 6(b) of Executive Order 12866, as amended.
It is hereby certified that these final regulations will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities within the meaning of section 601(6) of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. chapter 6). This certification is based on the fact that only 5,000 to 6,000 employees nationwide are estimated to earn fishing rights-related income. Therefore, a regulatory flexibility analysis under the Regulatory Flexibility Act is not required.
Pursuant to section 7805(f) of the Code, the proposed regulations that preceded these final regulations were submitted to the Chief Counsel for the Office of Advocacy of the Small Business Administration for comment on their impact on small business, and no comments were received.
In addition to written comments responding to the proposed regulations, these final regulations reflect comments provided in a Tribal consultation held on December 17, 2013, as well as comments provided in a meeting with members of the Treasury Tribal Advisory Committee Subcommittee on Parity and Reform on August 22, 2024.
The principal author of these regulations is Jamie Dvoretzky, Office of Associate Chief Counsel (Employee Benefits, Exempt Organizations, and Employment Taxes). However, other personnel from the Treasury Department and the IRS participated in the development of these regulations.
Accordingly, the Treasury Department and the IRS amend 26 CFR part 1 as follows:
Paragraph 1. The authority citation for part 1 continues to read in part as follows:
Authority: 26 U.S.C. 7805 * * *
* * * * *
Par. 2. Section 1.415(a)-1 is amended by adding paragraph (g)(5) to read as follows:
* * * * *
(g) * * *
(5) Special effective date. Section 1.415(c)-2(g)(9) applies for plan years ending on or after May 4, 2026.
Par. 3. Section 1.415(c)-2 is amended by adding paragraph (g)(9) to read as follows:
* * * * *
(g) * * *
(9) Income derived by Indians from exercise of fishing rights-related activities. Amounts paid to a member of an Indian tribe directly or through a qualified Indian entity (within the meaning of section 7873(b)(3)) as compensation for services performed in a fishing rights-related activity (as defined in section 7873(b)(1)) of the tribe do not fail to constitute compensation under paragraphs (b)(1) and (2) of this section (and are not excluded from the definition of compensation pursuant to paragraph (c)(4) of this section) merely because those amounts are not subject to income or employment taxes as a result of section 7873(a)(1) and (a)(2). Thus, the determination of whether an amount constitutes wages, salaries, or earned income for purposes of paragraph (b)(1) or (2) of this section is made without regard to the exemption from taxation under section 7873(a)(1) and (a)(2).
Frank J. Bisignano, Chief Executive Officer.
Approved: April 1, 2026.
Kenneth J. Kies,
Assistant Secretary of the Treasury (Tax Policy).
(Filed by the Office of the Federal Register May 1, 2026, 8:45 a.m., and published in the issue of the Federal Register for May 4, 2026, 91 FR 23915)
1 Section 72(f)(2) treats employer contributions as investment in the contract if those amounts would not have been includible in income of the employee had they been paid directly to the employee.
2 Section 72(b) provides that gross income does not include that part of any amount received as an annuity which bears the same ratio to such amount as the investment in the contract bears to the expected return under the contract.
Section 6621 of the Internal Revenue Code establishes the interest rates on overpayments and underpayments of tax. Under section 6621(a)(1), the overpayment rate is the sum of the federal short-term rate plus 3 percentage points (2 percentage points in the case of a corporation), except the rate for the portion of a corporate overpayment of tax exceeding $10,000 for a taxable period is the sum of the federal short-term rate plus 0.5 of a percentage point. Under section 6621(a)(2), the underpayment rate is the sum of the federal short-term rate plus 3 percentage points.
Section 6621(c) provides that for purposes of interest payable under section 6601 on any large corporate underpayment, the underpayment rate under section 6621(a)(2) is determined by substituting “5 percentage points” for “3 percentage points.” See section 6621(c) and section 301.6621-3 of the Regulations on Procedure and Administration for the definition of a large corporate underpayment and for the rules for determining the applicable date. Section 6621(c) and section 301.6621-3 are generally effective for periods after December 31, 1990.
Section 6621(b)(1) provides that the Secretary will determine the federal short-term rate for the first month in each calendar quarter. Section 6621(b)(2)(A) provides that the federal short-term rate determined under section 6621(b)(1) for any month applies during the first calendar quarter beginning after that month. Section 6621(b)(3) provides that the federal short-term rate for any month is the federal short-term rate determined during that month by the Secretary in accordance with section 1274(d), rounded to the nearest full percent (or, if a multiple of 1/2 of 1 percent, the rate is increased to the next highest full percent).
Notice 88-59, 1988-1 C.B. 546, announced that in determining the quarterly interest rates to be used for overpayments and underpayments of tax under section 6621, the Internal Revenue Service will use the federal short-term rate based on daily compounding because that rate is most consistent with section 6621 which, pursuant to section 6622, is subject to daily compounding.
The federal short-term rate determined in accordance with section 1274(d) during April 2026 is the rate published in Revenue Ruling 2026-9, 2026-19 IRB 897, to take effect beginning May 1, 2026. The federal short-term rate, rounded to the nearest full percent, based on daily compounding determined during the month of April 2026 is 4 percent. Accordingly, an overpayment rate of 7 percent (6 percent in the case of a corporation) and an underpayment rate of 7 percent are established for the calendar quarter beginning July 1, 2026. The overpayment rate for the portion of a corporate overpayment exceeding $10,000 for the calendar quarter beginning July 1, 2026, is 4.5 percent. The underpayment rate for large corporate underpayments for the calendar quarter beginning July 1, 2026, is 9 percent. These rates apply to amounts bearing interest during that calendar quarter.
Sections 6654(a)(1) and 6655(a)(1) provide that the underpayment rate established under section 6621 applies in determining the addition to tax under sections 6654 and 6655 for failure to pay estimated tax for any taxable year. Thus, the 7 percent rate also applies to estimated tax underpayments for the third calendar quarter beginning July 1, 2026. In addition, pursuant to section 6603(d)(4), the rate of interest on section 6603 deposits is 4 percent for the third calendar quarter in 2026.
Interest factors for daily compound interest for annual rates of 4.5 percent, 6 percent, 7 percent and 9 percent are published in Tables 14, 17, 19 and 23 of Rev. Proc. 95-17, 1995-1 C.B. 566, 569, 571, and 575.
Annual interest rates to be compounded daily pursuant to section 6622 that apply for prior periods are set forth in the tables accompanying this revenue ruling.
The principal author of this revenue ruling is Casey R. Conrad of the Office of the Associate Chief Counsel (Procedure and Administration). For further information regarding this revenue ruling, contact Mr. Conrad at (202) 317-6844 (not a toll-free number).
| 365 Day Year | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.5% Compound Rate 184 Days | |||||
| Days | Factor | Days | Factor | Days | Factor |
| 1 | 0.000013699 | 63 | 0.000863380 | 125 | 0.001713784 |
| 2 | 0.000027397 | 64 | 0.000877091 | 126 | 0.001727506 |
| 3 | 0.000041096 | 65 | 0.000890801 | 127 | 0.001741228 |
| 4 | 0.000054796 | 66 | 0.000904512 | 128 | 0.001754951 |
| 5 | 0.000068495 | 67 | 0.000918223 | 129 | 0.001768673 |
| 6 | 0.000082195 | 68 | 0.000931934 | 130 | 0.001782396 |
| 7 | 0.000095894 | 69 | 0.000945646 | 131 | 0.001796119 |
| 8 | 0.000109594 | 70 | 0.000959357 | 132 | 0.001809843 |
| 9 | 0.000123294 | 71 | 0.000973069 | 133 | 0.001823566 |
| 10 | 0.000136995 | 72 | 0.000986781 | 134 | 0.001837290 |
| 11 | 0.000150695 | 73 | 0.001000493 | 135 | 0.001851013 |
| 12 | 0.000164396 | 74 | 0.001014206 | 136 | 0.001864737 |
| 13 | 0.000178097 | 75 | 0.001027918 | 137 | 0.001878462 |
| 14 | 0.000191798 | 76 | 0.001041631 | 138 | 0.001892186 |
| 15 | 0.000205499 | 77 | 0.001055344 | 139 | 0.001905910 |
| 16 | 0.000219201 | 78 | 0.001069057 | 140 | 0.001919635 |
| 17 | 0.000232902 | 79 | 0.001082770 | 141 | 0.001933360 |
| 18 | 0.000246604 | 80 | 0.001096484 | 142 | 0.001947085 |
| 19 | 0.000260306 | 81 | 0.001110197 | 143 | 0.001960811 |
| 20 | 0.000274008 | 82 | 0.001123911 | 144 | 0.001974536 |
| 21 | 0.000287711 | 83 | 0.001137625 | 145 | 0.001988262 |
| 22 | 0.000301413 | 84 | 0.001151339 | 146 | 0.002001988 |
| 23 | 0.000315116 | 85 | 0.001165054 | 147 | 0.002015714 |
| 24 | 0.000328819 | 86 | 0.001178768 | 148 | 0.002029440 |
| 25 | 0.000342522 | 87 | 0.001192483 | 149 | 0.002043166 |
| 26 | 0.000356225 | 88 | 0.001206198 | 150 | 0.002056893 |
| 27 | 0.000369929 | 89 | 0.001219913 | 151 | 0.002070620 |
| 28 | 0.000383633 | 90 | 0.001233629 | 152 | 0.002084347 |
| 29 | 0.000397336 | 91 | 0.001247344 | 153 | 0.002098074 |
| 30 | 0.000411041 | 92 | 0.001261060 | 154 | 0.002111801 |
| 31 | 0.000424745 | 93 | 0.001274776 | 155 | 0.002125529 |
| 32 | 0.000438449 | 94 | 0.001288492 | 156 | 0.002139257 |
| 33 | 0.000452154 | 95 | 0.001302208 | 157 | 0.002152985 |
| 34 | 0.000465859 | 96 | 0.001315925 | 158 | 0.002166713 |
| 35 | 0.000479564 | 97 | 0.001329641 | 159 | 0.002180441 |
| 36 | 0.000493269 | 98 | 0.001343358 | 160 | 0.002194169 |
| 37 | 0.000506974 | 99 | 0.001357075 | 161 | 0.002207898 |
| 38 | 0.000520680 | 100 | 0.001370792 | 162 | 0.002221627 |
| 39 | 0.000534386 | 101 | 0.001384510 | 163 | 0.002235356 |
| 40 | 0.000548092 | 102 | 0.001398227 | 164 | 0.002249085 |
| 41 | 0.000561798 | 103 | 0.001411945 | 165 | 0.002262815 |
| 42 | 0.000575504 | 104 | 0.001425663 | 166 | 0.002276544 |
| 43 | 0.000589211 | 105 | 0.001439381 | 167 | 0.002290274 |
| 44 | 0.000602917 | 106 | 0.001453100 | 168 | 0.002304004 |
| 45 | 0.000616624 | 107 | 0.001466818 | 169 | 0.002317734 |
| 46 | 0.000630331 | 108 | 0.001480537 | 170 | 0.002331465 |
| 47 | 0.000644039 | 109 | 0.001494256 | 171 | 0.002345195 |
| 48 | 0.000657746 | 110 | 0.001507975 | 172 | 0.002358926 |
| 49 | 0.000671454 | 111 | 0.001521694 | 173 | 0.002372657 |
| 50 | 0.000685161 | 112 | 0.001535414 | 174 | 0.002386388 |
| 51 | 0.000698869 | 113 | 0.001549133 | 175 | 0.002400120 |
| 52 | 0.000712578 | 114 | 0.001562853 | 176 | 0.002413851 |
| 53 | 0.000726286 | 115 | 0.001576573 | 177 | 0.002427583 |
| 54 | 0.000739995 | 116 | 0.001590293 | 178 | 0.002441315 |
| 55 | 0.000753703 | 117 | 0.001604014 | 179 | 0.002455047 |
| 56 | 0.000767412 | 118 | 0.001617734 | 180 | 0.002468779 |
| 57 | 0.000781121 | 119 | 0.001631455 | 181 | 0.002482511 |
| 58 | 0.000794831 | 120 | 0.001645176 | 182 | 0.002496244 |
| 59 | 0.000808540 | 121 | 0.001658897 | 183 | 0.002509977 |
| 60 | 0.000822250 | 122 | 0.001672619 | 184 | 0.002523710 |
| 61 | 0.000835960 | 123 | 0.001686340 | ||
| 62 | 0.000849670 | 124 | 0.001700062 | ||
| 366 Day Year | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.5% Compound Rate 184 Days | |||||
| Days | Factor | Days | Factor | Days | Factor |
| 1 | 0.000013661 | 63 | 0.000861020 | 125 | 0.001709097 |
| 2 | 0.000027323 | 64 | 0.000874693 | 126 | 0.001722782 |
| 3 | 0.000040984 | 65 | 0.000888366 | 127 | 0.001736467 |
| 4 | 0.000054646 | 66 | 0.000902040 | 128 | 0.001750152 |
| 5 | 0.000068308 | 67 | 0.000915713 | 129 | 0.001763837 |
| 6 | 0.000081970 | 68 | 0.000929387 | 130 | 0.001777522 |
| 7 | 0.000095632 | 69 | 0.000943061 | 131 | 0.001791208 |
| 8 | 0.000109295 | 70 | 0.000956735 | 132 | 0.001804893 |
| 9 | 0.000122958 | 71 | 0.000970409 | 133 | 0.001818579 |
| 10 | 0.000136620 | 72 | 0.000984084 | 134 | 0.001832265 |
| 11 | 0.000150283 | 73 | 0.000997758 | 135 | 0.001845951 |
| 12 | 0.000163947 | 74 | 0.001011433 | 136 | 0.001859638 |
| 13 | 0.000177610 | 75 | 0.001025108 | 137 | 0.001873324 |
| 14 | 0.000191274 | 76 | 0.001038783 | 138 | 0.001887011 |
| 15 | 0.000204938 | 77 | 0.001052459 | 139 | 0.001900698 |
| 16 | 0.000218602 | 78 | 0.001066134 | 140 | 0.001914385 |
| 17 | 0.000232266 | 79 | 0.001079810 | 141 | 0.001928073 |
| 18 | 0.000245930 | 80 | 0.001093486 | 142 | 0.001941760 |
| 19 | 0.000259595 | 81 | 0.001107162 | 143 | 0.001955448 |
| 20 | 0.000273260 | 82 | 0.001120839 | 144 | 0.001969136 |
| 21 | 0.000286924 | 83 | 0.001134515 | 145 | 0.001982824 |
| 22 | 0.000300590 | 84 | 0.001148192 | 146 | 0.001996512 |
| 23 | 0.000314255 | 85 | 0.001161869 | 147 | 0.002010201 |
| 24 | 0.000327920 | 86 | 0.001175546 | 148 | 0.002023889 |
| 25 | 0.000341586 | 87 | 0.001189223 | 149 | 0.002037578 |
| 26 | 0.000355252 | 88 | 0.001202900 | 150 | 0.002051267 |
| 27 | 0.000368918 | 89 | 0.001216578 | 151 | 0.002064957 |
| 28 | 0.000382584 | 90 | 0.001230256 | 152 | 0.002078646 |
| 29 | 0.000396251 | 91 | 0.001243934 | 153 | 0.002092336 |
| 30 | 0.000409917 | 92 | 0.001257612 | 154 | 0.002106025 |
| 31 | 0.000423584 | 93 | 0.001271291 | 155 | 0.002119715 |
| 32 | 0.000437251 | 94 | 0.001284969 | 156 | 0.002133405 |
| 33 | 0.000450918 | 95 | 0.001298648 | 157 | 0.002147096 |
| 34 | 0.000464586 | 96 | 0.001312327 | 158 | 0.002160786 |
| 35 | 0.000478253 | 97 | 0.001326006 | 159 | 0.002174477 |
| 36 | 0.000491921 | 98 | 0.001339685 | 160 | 0.002188168 |
| 37 | 0.000505589 | 99 | 0.001353365 | 161 | 0.002201859 |
| 38 | 0.000519257 | 100 | 0.001367044 | 162 | 0.002215550 |
| 39 | 0.000532925 | 101 | 0.001380724 | 163 | 0.002229242 |
| 40 | 0.000546594 | 102 | 0.001394404 | 164 | 0.002242933 |
| 41 | 0.000560262 | 103 | 0.001408085 | 165 | 0.002256625 |
| 42 | 0.000573931 | 104 | 0.001421765 | 166 | 0.002270317 |
| 43 | 0.000587600 | 105 | 0.001435446 | 167 | 0.002284010 |
| 44 | 0.000601269 | 106 | 0.001449127 | 168 | 0.002297702 |
| 45 | 0.000614939 | 107 | 0.001462808 | 169 | 0.002311395 |
| 46 | 0.000628608 | 108 | 0.001476489 | 170 | 0.002325087 |
| 47 | 0.000642278 | 109 | 0.001490170 | 171 | 0.002338780 |
| 48 | 0.000655948 | 110 | 0.001503852 | 172 | 0.002352473 |
| 49 | 0.000669618 | 111 | 0.001517533 | 173 | 0.002366167 |
| 50 | 0.000683289 | 112 | 0.001531215 | 174 | 0.002379860 |
| 51 | 0.000696959 | 113 | 0.001544897 | 175 | 0.002393554 |
| 52 | 0.000710630 | 114 | 0.001558580 | 176 | 0.002407248 |
| 53 | 0.000724301 | 115 | 0.001572262 | 177 | 0.002420942 |
| 54 | 0.000737972 | 116 | 0.001585945 | 178 | 0.002434636 |
| 55 | 0.000751643 | 117 | 0.001599628 | 179 | 0.002448331 |
| 56 | 0.000765315 | 118 | 0.001613311 | 180 | 0.002462025 |
| 57 | 0.000778986 | 119 | 0.001626994 | 181 | 0.002475720 |
| 58 | 0.000792658 | 120 | 0.001640678 | 182 | 0.002489415 |
| 59 | 0.000806330 | 121 | 0.001654361 | 183 | 0.002503110 |
| 60 | 0.000820003 | 122 | 0.001668045 | 184 | 0.002516806 |
| 61 | 0.000833675 | 123 | 0.001681729 | ||
| 62 | 0.000847348 | 124 | 0.001695413 | ||
TABLE OF INTEREST RATES PERIODS BEFORE JUL. 1, 1975 - PERIODS ENDING DEC. 31, 1986 OVERPAYMENTS AND UNDERPAYMENT
| PERIOD | RATE | In 1995-1 C.B. DAILY RATE TABLE | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Before Jul. 1, 1975 | 6% | Table | 2, | pg. | 557 |
| Jul. 1, 1975–Jan. 31, 1976 | 9% | Table | 4, | pg. | 559 |
| Feb. 1, 1976–Jan. 31, 1978 | 7% | Table | 3, | pg. | 558 |
| Feb. 1, 1978–Jan. 31, 1980 | 6% | Table | 2, | pg. | 557 |
| Feb. 1, 1980–Jan. 31, 1982 | 12% | Table | 5, | pg. | 560 |
| Feb. 1, 1982–Dec. 31, 1982 | 20% | Table | 6, | pg. | 560 |
| Jan. 1, 1983–Jun. 30, 1983 | 16% | Table | 37, | pg. | 591 |
| Jul. 1, 1983–Dec. 31, 1983 | 11% | Table | 27, | pg. | 581 |
| Jan. 1, 1984–Jun. 30, 1984 | 11% | Table | 75, | pg. | 629 |
| Jul. 1, 1984–Dec. 31, 1984 | 11% | Table | 75, | pg. | 629 |
| Jan. 1, 1985–Dec. 31, 1985 | 13% | Table | 31, | pg. | 585 |
| Jul. 1, 1985–Dec. 31, 1985 | 11% | Table | 27, | pg. | 581 |
| Jan. 1, 1986–Jun. 30, 1986 | 10% | Table | 25, | pg. | 579 |
| Jul. 1, 1986–Dec. 31, 1986 | 9% | Table | 23, | pg. | 577 |
TABLE OF INTEREST RATES FROM JAN. 1, 1987 - Dec. 31, 1998
| OVERPAYMENTS | UNDERPAYMENTS | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1995-1 C.B. | 1995-1 C.B. RATE | |||||
| RATE | TABLE | PG | RATE | TABLE | PG | |
| Jan. 1, 1987–Mar. 31, 1987 | 8% | 21 | 575 | 9% | 23 | 577 |
| Apr. 1, 1987–Jun. 30, 1987 | 8% | 21 | 575 | 9% | 23 | 577 |
| Jul. 1, 1987–Sep. 30, 1987 | 8% | 21 | 575 | 9% | 23 | 577 |
| Oct. 1, 1987–Dec. 31, 1987 | 9% | 23 | 577 | 10% | 25 | 579 |
| Jan. 1, 1988–Mar. 31, 1988 | 10% | 73 | 627 | 11% | 75 | 629 |
| Apr. 1, 1988–Jun. 30, 1988 | 9% | 71 | 625 | 10% | 73 | 627 |
| Jul. 1, 1988–Sep. 30, 1988 | 9% | 71 | 625 | 10% | 73 | 627 |
| Oct. 1, 1988–Dec. 31, 1988 | 10% | 73 | 627 | 11% | 75 | 629 |
| Jan. 1, 1989–Mar. 31, 1989 | 10% | 25 | 579 | 11% | 27 | 581 |
| Apr. 1, 1989–Jun. 30, 1989 | 11% | 27 | 581 | 12% | 29 | 583 |
| Jul. 1, 1989–Sep. 30, 1989 | 11% | 27 | 581 | 12% | 29 | 583 |
| Oct. 1, 1989–Dec. 31, 1989 | 10% | 25 | 579 | 11% | 27 | 581 |
| Jan. 1, 1990–Mar. 31, 1990 | 10% | 25 | 579 | 11% | 27 | 581 |
| Apr. 1, 1990–Jun. 30, 1990 | 10% | 25 | 579 | 11% | 27 | 581 |
| Jul. 1, 1990–Sep. 30, 1990 | 10% | 25 | 579 | 11% | 27 | 581 |
| Oct. 1, 1990–Dec. 31, 1990 | 10% | 25 | 579 | 11% | 27 | 581 |
| Jan. 1, 1991–Mar. 31, 1991 | 10% | 25 | 579 | 11% | 27 | 581 |
| Apr. 1, 1991–Jun. 30, 1991 | 9% | 23 | 577 | 10% | 25 | 579 |
| Jul. 1, 1991–Sep. 30, 1991 | 9% | 23 | 577 | 10% | 25 | 579 |
| Oct. 1, 1991–Dec. 31, 1991 | 9% | 23 | 577 | 10% | 25 | 579 |
| Jan. 1, 1992–Mar. 31, 1992 | 8% | 69 | 623 | 9% | 71 | 625 |
| Apr. 1, 1992–Jun. 30, 1992 | 7% | 67 | 621 | 8% | 69 | 623 |
| Jul. 1, 1992–Sep. 30, 1992 | 7% | 67 | 621 | 8% | 69 | 623 |
| Oct. 1, 1992–Dec. 31, 1992 | 6% | 65 | 619 | 7% | 67 | 621 |
| Jan. 1, 1993–Mar. 31, 1993 | 6% | 17 | 571 | 7% | 19 | 573 |
| Apr. 1, 1993–Jun. 30, 1993 | 6% | 17 | 571 | 7% | 19 | 573 |
| Jul. 1, 1993–Sep. 30, 1993 | 6% | 17 | 571 | 7% | 19 | 573 |
| Oct. 1, 1993–Dec. 31, 1993 | 6% | 17 | 571 | 7% | 19 | 573 |
| Jan. 1, 1994–Mar. 31, 1994 | 6% | 17 | 571 | 7% | 19 | 573 |
| Apr. 1, 1994–Jun. 30, 1994 | 6% | 17 | 571 | 7% | 19 | 573 |
| Jul. 1, 1994–Sep. 30, 1994 | 7% | 19 | 573 | 8% | 21 | 575 |
| Oct. 1, 1994–Dec. 31, 1994 | 8% | 21 | 575 | 9% | 23 | 577 |
| Jan. 1, 1995–Mar. 31, 1995 | 8% | 21 | 575 | 9% | 23 | 577 |
| Apr. 1, 1995–Jun. 30, 1995 | 9% | 23 | 577 | 10% | 25 | 579 |
| Jul. 1, 1995–Sep. 30, 1995 | 8% | 21 | 575 | 9% | 23 | 577 |
| Oct. 1, 1995–Dec. 31, 1995 | 8% | 21 | 575 | 9% | 23 | 577 |
| Jan. 1, 1996–Mar. 31, 1996 | 8% | 69 | 623 | 9% | 71 | 625 |
| Apr. 1, 1996–Jun. 30, 1996 | 7% | 67 | 621 | 8% | 69 | 623 |
| Jul. 1, 1996–Sep. 30, 1996 | 8% | 69 | 623 | 9% | 71 | 625 |
| Oct. 1, 1996–Dec. 31, 1996 | 8% | 69 | 623 | 9% | 71 | 625 |
| Jan. 1, 1997–Mar. 31, 1997 | 8% | 21 | 575 | 9% | 23 | 577 |
| Apr. 1, 1997–Jun. 30, 1997 | 8% | 21 | 575 | 9% | 23 | 577 |
| Jul. 1, 1997–Sep. 30, 1997 | 8% | 21 | 575 | 9% | 23 | 577 |
| Oct. 1, 1997–Dec. 31, 1997 | 8% | 21 | 575 | 9% | 23 | 577 |
| Jan. 1, 1998–Mar. 31, 1998 | 8% | 21 | 575 | 9% | 23 | 577 |
| Apr. 1, 1998–Jun. 30, 1998 | 7% | 19 | 573 | 8% | 21 | 575 |
| Jul. 1, 1998–Sep. 30, 1998 | 7% | 19 | 573 | 8% | 21 | 575 |
| Oct. 1, 1998–Dec. 31, 1998 | 7% | 19 | 573 | 8% | 21 | 575 |
TABLE OF INTEREST RATES FROM JANUARY 1, 1999 - PRESENT NONCORPORATE OVERPAYMENTS AND UNDERPAYMENTS
| 1995-1 C.B. | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| RATE | TABLE | PAGE | |
| Jan. 1, 1999–Mar. 31, 1999 | 7% | 19 | 573 |
| Apr. 1, 1999–Jun. 30, 1999 | 8% | 21 | 575 |
| Jul. 1, 1999–Sep. 30, 1999 | 8% | 21 | 575 |
| Oct. 1, 1999–Dec. 31, 1999 | 8% | 21 | 575 |
| Jan. 1, 2000–Mar. 31, 2000 | 8% | 69 | 623 |
| Apr. 1, 2000–Jun. 30, 2000 | 9% | 71 | 625 |
| Jul. 1, 2000–Sep. 30, 2000 | 9% | 71 | 625 |
| Oct. 1, 2000–Dec. 31, 2000 | 9% | 71 | 625 |
| Jan. 1, 2001–Mar. 31, 2001 | 9% | 23 | 577 |
| Apr. 1, 2001–Jun. 30, 2001 | 8% | 21 | 575 |
| Jul. 1, 2001–Sep. 30, 2001 | 7% | 19 | 573 |
| Oct. 1, 2001–Dec. 31, 2001 | 7% | 19 | 573 |
| Jan. 1, 2002–Mar. 31, 2002 | 6% | 17 | 571 |
| Apr. 1, 2002–Jun. 30, 2002 | 6% | 17 | 571 |
| Jul. 1, 2002–Sep. 30, 2002 | 6% | 17 | 571 |
| Oct. 1, 2002–Dec. 31, 2002 | 6% | 17 | 571 |
| Jan. 1, 2003–Mar. 31, 2003 | 5% | 15 | 569 |
| Apr. 1, 2003–Jun. 30, 2003 | 5% | 15 | 569 |
| Jul. 1, 2003–Sep. 30, 2003 | 5% | 15 | 569 |
| Oct. 1, 2003–Dec. 31, 2003 | 4% | 13 | 567 |
| Jan. 1, 2004–Mar. 31, 2004 | 4% | 61 | 615 |
| Apr. 1, 2004–Jun. 30, 2004 | 5% | 63 | 617 |
| Jul. 1, 2004–Sep. 30, 2004 | 4% | 61 | 615 |
| Oct. 1, 2004–Dec. 31, 2004 | 5% | 63 | 617 |
| Jan. 1, 2005–Mar. 31, 2005 | 5% | 15 | 569 |
| Apr. 1, 2005–Jun. 30, 2005 | 6% | 17 | 571 |
| Jul. 1, 2005–Sep. 30, 2005 | 6% | 17 | 571 |
| Oct. 1, 2005–Dec. 31, 2005 | 7% | 19 | 573 |
| Jan. 1, 2006–Mar. 31, 2006 | 7% | 19 | 573 |
| Apr. 1, 2006–Jun. 30, 2006 | 7% | 19 | 573 |
| Jul. 1, 2006–Sep. 30, 2006 | 8% | 21 | 575 |
| Oct. 1, 2006–Dec. 31, 2006 | 8% | 21 | 575 |
| Jan. 1, 2007–Mar. 31, 2007 | 8% | 21 | 575 |
| Apr. 1, 2007–Jun. 30, 2007 | 8% | 21 | 575 |
| Jul. 1, 2007–Sep. 30, 2007 | 8% | 21 | 575 |
| Oct. 1, 2007–Dec. 31, 2007 | 8% | 21 | 575 |
| Jan. 1, 2008–Mar. 31, 2008 | 7% | 67 | 621 |
| Apr. 1, 2008–Jun. 30, 2008 | 6% | 65 | 619 |
| Jul. 1, 2008–Sep. 30, 2008 | 5% | 63 | 617 |
| Oct. 1, 2008–Dec. 31, 2008 | 6% | 65 | 619 |
| Jan. 1, 2009–Mar. 31, 2009 | 5% | 15 | 569 |
| Apr. 1, 2009–Jun. 30, 2009 | 4% | 13 | 567 |
| Jul. 1, 2009–Sep. 30, 2009 | 4% | 13 | 567 |
| Oct. 1, 2009–Dec. 31, 2009 | 4% | 13 | 567 |
| Jan. 1, 2010–Mar. 31, 2010 | 4% | 13 | 567 |
| Apr. 1, 2010–Jun. 30, 2010 | 4% | 13 | 567 |
| Jul. 1, 2010–Sep. 30, 2010 | 4% | 13 | 567 |
| Oct. 1, 2010–Dec. 31, 2010 | 4% | 13 | 567 |
| Jan. 1, 2011–Mar. 31, 2011 | 3% | 11 | 565 |
| Apr. 1, 2011–Jun. 30, 2011 | 4% | 13 | 567 |
| Jul. 1, 2011–Sep. 30, 2011 | 4% | 13 | 567 |
| Oct. 1, 2011–Dec. 31, 2011 | 3% | 11 | 565 |
| Jan. 1, 2012–Mar. 31, 2012 | 3% | 59 | 613 |
| Apr. 1, 2012–Jun. 30, 2012 | 3% | 59 | 613 |
| Jul. 1, 2012–Sep. 30, 2012 | 3% | 59 | 613 |
| Oct. 1, 2012–Dec. 31, 2012 | 3% | 59 | 613 |
| Jan. 1, 2013–Mar. 31, 2013 | 3% | 11 | 565 |
| Apr. 1, 2013–Jun. 30, 2013 | 3% | 11 | 565 |
| Jul. 1, 2013–Sep. 30, 2013 | 3% | 11 | 565 |
| Oct. 1, 2013–Dec. 31, 2013 | 3% | 11 | 565 |
| Jan. 1, 2014–Mar. 31, 2014 | 3% | 11 | 565 |
| Apr. 1, 2014–Jun. 30, 2014 | 3% | 11 | 565 |
| Jul. 1, 2014–Sep. 30, 2014 | 3% | 11 | 565 |
| Oct. 1, 2014–Dec. 31, 2014 | 3% | 11 | 565 |
| Jan. 1, 2015–Mar. 31, 2015 | 3% | 11 | 565 |
| Apr. 1, 2015–Jun. 30, 2015 | 3% | 11 | 565 |
| Jul. 1, 2015–Sep. 30, 2015 | 3% | 11 | 565 |
| Oct. 1, 2015–Dec. 31, 2015 | 3% | 11 | 565 |
| Jan. 1, 2016–Mar. 31, 2016 | 3% | 59 | 613 |
| Apr. 1, 2016–Jun. 30, 2016 | 4% | 61 | 615 |
| Jul. 1, 2016–Sep. 30, 2016 | 4% | 61 | 615 |
| Oct. 1, 2016–Dec. 31, 2016 | 4% | 61 | 615 |
| Jan. 1, 2017–Mar. 31, 2017 | 4% | 13 | 567 |
| Apr. 1, 2017–Jun. 30, 2017 | 4% | 13 | 567 |
| Jul. 1, 2017–Sep. 30, 2017 | 4% | 13 | 567 |
| Oct. 1, 2017–Dec. 31, 2017 | 4% | 13 | 567 |
| Jan. 1, 2018–Mar. 31, 2018 | 4% | 13 | 567 |
| Apr. 1, 2018–Jun. 30, 2018 | 5% | 15 | 569 |
| Jul. 1, 2018–Sep. 30, 2018 | 5% | 15 | 569 |
| Oct. 1, 2018–Dec. 31, 2018 | 5% | 15 | 569 |
| Jan. 1, 2019–Mar. 31, 2019 | 6% | 17 | 571 |
| Apr. 1, 2019–Jun. 30, 2019 | 6% | 17 | 571 |
| Jul. 1, 2019–Sep. 30, 2019 | 5% | 15 | 569 |
| Oct. 1, 2019–Dec. 31, 2019 | 5% | 15 | 569 |
| Jan. 1, 2020–Mar. 31, 2020 | 5% | 63 | 617 |
| Apr. 1, 2020–Jun. 30, 2020 | 5% | 63 | 617 |
| Jul. 1, 2020–Sep. 30, 2020 | 3% | 59 | 613 |
| Oct. 1, 2020–Dec. 31, 2020 | 3% | 59 | 613 |
| Jan. 1, 2021–Mar. 31, 2021 | 3% | 11 | 565 |
| Apr. 1, 2021–Jun. 30, 2021 | 3% | 11 | 565 |
| Jul. 1, 2021–Sep. 30, 2021 | 3% | 11 | 565 |
| Oct. 1, 2021–Dec. 31, 2021 | 3% | 11 | 565 |
| Jan. 1, 2022–Mar. 31, 2022 | 3% | 11 | 565 |
| Apr. 1, 2022–Jun. 30, 2022 | 4% | 13 | 567 |
| Jul. 1, 2022–Sep. 30, 2022 | 5% | 15 | 569 |
| Oct. 1, 2022–Dec. 31, 2022 | 6% | 17 | 571 |
| Jan. 1, 2023–Mar. 31, 2023 | 7% | 19 | 573 |
| Apr. 1, 2023–Jun. 30, 2023 | 7% | 19 | 573 |
| Jul. 1, 2023–Sep. 30, 2023 | 7% | 19 | 573 |
| Oct. 1, 2023–Dec. 31, 2023 | 8% | 21 | 575 |
| Jan. 1, 2024–Mar. 31, 2024 | 8% | 69 | 623 |
| Apr. 1, 2024–Jun. 30, 2024 | 8% | 69 | 623 |
| Jul. 1, 2024–Sep. 30, 2024 | 8% | 69 | 623 |
| Oct. 1, 2024–Dec. 31, 2024 | 8% | 69 | 623 |
| Jan. 1, 2025–Mar. 31, 2025 | 7% | 19 | 573 |
| Apr. 1, 2025–Jun. 30, 2025 | 7% | 19 | 573 |
| Jul. 1, 2025–Sep. 30, 2025 | 7% | 19 | 573 |
| Oct. 1, 2025–Dec. 31, 2025 | 7% | 19 | 573 |
| Jan. 1, 2026–Mar. 31, 2026 | 7% | 19 | 573 |
| Apr. 1, 2026–Jun. 30, 2026 | 6% | 17 | 571 |
| Jul. 1, 2026–Sep. 30, 2026 | 7% | 19 | 573 |
TABLE OF INTEREST RATES FROM JANUARY 1, 1999 - PRESENT CORPORATE OVERPAYMENTS AND UNDERPAYMENTS
| OVERPAYMENTS | UNDERPAYMENTS | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1995-1 C.B. | 1995-1 C.B. | |||||
| RATE | TABLE | PG | RATE | TABLE | PG | |
| Jan. 1, 1999–Mar. 31, 1999 | 6% | 17 | 571 | 7% | 19 | 573 |
| Apr. 1, 1999–Jun. 30, 1999 | 7% | 19 | 573 | 8% | 21 | 575 |
| Jul. 1, 1999–Sep. 30, 1999 | 7% | 19 | 573 | 8% | 21 | 575 |
| Oct. 1, 1999–Dec. 31, 1999 | 7% | 19 | 573 | 8% | 21 | 575 |
| Jan. 1, 2000–Mar. 30, 2000 | 7% | 67 | 621 | 8% | 69 | 623 |
| Apr. 1, 2000–Jun. 30, 2000 | 8% | 69 | 623 | 9% | 71 | 625 |
| Jul. 1, 2000–Sep. 30, 2000 | 8% | 69 | 623 | 9% | 71 | 625 |
| Oct. 1, 2000–Dec. 31, 2000 | 8% | 69 | 623 | 9% | 71 | 625 |
| Jan. 1, 2001–Mar. 31, 2001 | 8% | 21 | 575 | 9% | 23 | 577 |
| Apr. 1, 2001–Jun. 30, 2001 | 7% | 19 | 573 | 8% | 21 | 575 |
| Jul. 1, 2001–Sep. 30, 2001 | 6% | 17 | 571 | 7% | 19 | 573 |
| Oct. 1, 2001–Dec. 31, 2001 | 6% | 17 | 571 | 7% | 19 | 573 |
| Jan. 1, 2002–Mar. 31, 2002 | 5% | 15 | 569 | 6% | 17 | 571 |
| Apr. 1, 2002–Jun. 30, 2002 | 5% | 15 | 569 | 6% | 17 | 571 |
| Jul. 1, 2002–Sep. 30, 2002 | 5% | 15 | 569 | 6% | 17 | 571 |
| Oct. 1, 2002–Dec. 31, 2002 | 5% | 15 | 569 | 6% | 17 | 571 |
| Jan. 1, 2003–Mar. 31, 2003 | 4% | 13 | 567 | 5% | 15 | 569 |
| Apr. 1, 2003–Jun. 30, 2003 | 4% | 13 | 567 | 5% | 15 | 569 |
| Jul. 1, 2003–Sep. 30, 2003 | 4% | 13 | 567 | 5% | 15 | 569 |
| Oct. 1, 2003–Dec. 31, 2003 | 3% | 11 | 565 | 4% | 13 | 567 |
| Jan. 1, 2004–Mar. 31, 2004 | 3% | 59 | 613 | 4% | 61 | 615 |
| Apr. 1, 2004–Jun. 30, 2004 | 4% | 61 | 615 | 5% | 63 | 617 |
| Jul. 1, 2004–Sep. 30, 2004 | 3% | 59 | 613 | 4% | 61 | 615 |
| Oct. 1, 2004–Dec. 31, 2004 | 4% | 61 | 615 | 5% | 63 | 617 |
| Jan. 1, 2005–Mar. 31, 2005 | 4% | 13 | 567 | 5% | 15 | 569 |
| Apr. 1, 2005–Jun. 30, 2005 | 5% | 15 | 569 | 6% | 17 | 571 |
| Jul. 1, 2005–Sep. 30, 2005 | 5% | 15 | 569 | 6% | 17 | 571 |
| Oct. 1, 2005–Dec. 31, 2005 | 6% | 17 | 571 | 7% | 19 | 573 |
| Jan. 1, 2006–Mar. 31, 2006 | 6% | 17 | 571 | 7% | 19 | 573 |
| Apr. 1, 2006–Jun. 30, 2006 | 6% | 17 | 571 | 7% | 19 | 573 |
| Jul. 1, 2006–Sep. 30, 2006 | 7% | 19 | 573 | 8% | 21 | 575 |
| Oct. 1, 2006–Dec. 31, 2006 | 7% | 19 | 573 | 8% | 21 | 575 |
| Jan. 1, 2007–Mar. 31, 2007 | 7% | 19 | 573 | 8% | 21 | 575 |
| Apr. 1, 2007–Jun. 30, 2007 | 7% | 19 | 573 | 8% | 21 | 575 |
| Jul. 1, 2007–Sep. 30, 2007 | 7% | 19 | 573 | 8% | 21 | 575 |
| Oct. 1, 2007–Dec. 31, 2007 | 7% | 19 | 573 | 8% | 21 | 575 |
| Jan. 1, 2008–Mar. 31, 2008 | 6% | 65 | 619 | 7% | 67 | 621 |
| Apr. 1, 2008–Jun. 30, 2008 | 5% | 63 | 617 | 6% | 65 | 619 |
| Jul. 1, 2008–Sep. 30, 2008 | 4% | 61 | 615 | 5% | 63 | 617 |
| Oct. 1, 2008–Dec. 31, 2008 | 5% | 63 | 617 | 6% | 65 | 619 |
| Jan. 1, 2009–Mar. 31, 2009 | 4% | 13 | 567 | 5% | 15 | 569 |
| Apr. 1, 2009–Jun. 30, 2009 | 3% | 11 | 565 | 4% | 13 | 567 |
| Jul. 1, 2009–Sep. 30, 2009 | 3% | 11 | 565 | 4% | 13 | 567 |
| Oct. 1, 2009–Dec. 31, 2009 | 3% | 11 | 565 | 4% | 13 | 567 |
| Jan. 1, 2010–Mar. 31, 2010 | 3% | 11 | 565 | 4% | 13 | 567 |
| Apr. 1, 2010–Jun. 30, 2010 | 3% | 11 | 565 | 4% | 13 | 567 |
| Jul. 1, 2010–Sep. 30, 2010 | 3% | 11 | 565 | 4% | 13 | 567 |
| Oct. 1, 2010–Dec. 31, 2010 | 3% | 11 | 565 | 4% | 13 | 567 |
| Jan. 1, 2011–Mar. 31, 2011 | 2% | 9 | 563 | 3% | 11 | 565 |
| Apr. 1, 2011–Jun. 30, 2011 | 3% | 11 | 565 | 4% | 13 | 567 |
| Jul. 1, 2011–Sep. 30, 2011 | 3% | 11 | 565 | 4% | 13 | 567 |
| Oct. 1, 2011–Dec. 31, 2011 | 2% | 9 | 563 | 3% | 11 | 565 |
| Jan. 1, 2012–Mar. 31, 2012 | 2% | 57 | 611 | 3% | 59 | 613 |
| Apr. 1, 2012–Jun. 30, 2012 | 2% | 57 | 611 | 3% | 59 | 613 |
| Jul. 1, 2012–Sep. 30, 2012 | 2% | 57 | 611 | 3% | 59 | 613 |
| Oct. 1, 2012–Dec. 31, 2012 | 2% | 57 | 611 | 3% | 59 | 613 |
| Jan. 1, 2013–Mar. 31, 2013 | 2% | 9 | 563 | 3% | 11 | 565 |
| Apr. 1, 2013–Jun. 30, 2013 | 2% | 9 | 563 | 3% | 11 | 565 |
| Jul. 1, 2013–Sep. 30, 2013 | 2% | 9 | 563 | 3% | 11 | 565 |
| Oct. 1, 2013–Dec. 31, 2013 | 2% | 9 | 563 | 3% | 11 | 565 |
| Jan. 1, 2014–Mar. 31, 2014 | 2% | 9 | 563 | 3% | 11 | 565 |
| Apr. 1, 2014–Jun. 30, 2014 | 2% | 9 | 563 | 3% | 11 | 565 |
| Jul. 1, 2014–Sep. 30, 2014 | 2% | 9 | 563 | 3% | 11 | 565 |
| Oct. 1, 2014–Dec. 31, 2014 | 2% | 9 | 563 | 3% | 11 | 565 |
| Jan. 1, 2015–Mar. 31, 2015 | 2% | 9 | 563 | 3% | 11 | 565 |
| Apr. 1, 2015–Jun. 30, 2015 | 2% | 9 | 563 | 3% | 11 | 565 |
| Jul. 1, 2015–Sep. 30, 2015 | 2% | 9 | 563 | 3% | 11 | 565 |
| Oct. 1, 2015–Dec. 31, 2015 | 2% | 9 | 563 | 3% | 11 | 565 |
| Jan. 1, 2016–Mar. 31, 2016 | 2% | 57 | 611 | 3% | 59 | 613 |
| Apr. 1, 2016–Jun. 30, 2016 | 3% | 59 | 613 | 4% | 61 | 615 |
| Jul. 1, 2016–Sep. 30, 2016 | 3% | 59 | 613 | 4% | 61 | 615 |
| Oct. 1, 2016–Dec. 31, 2016 | 3% | 59 | 613 | 4% | 61 | 615 |
| Jan. 1, 2017–Mar. 31, 2017 | 3% | 11 | 565 | 4% | 13 | 567 |
| Apr. 1, 2017–Jun. 30, 2017 | 3% | 11 | 565 | 4% | 13 | 567 |
| Jul. 1, 2017–Sep. 30, 2017 | 3% | 11 | 565 | 4% | 13 | 567 |
| Oct. 1, 2017–Dec. 31, 2017 | 3% | 11 | 565 | 4% | 13 | 567 |
| Jan. 1, 2018–Mar. 31, 2018 | 3% | 11 | 565 | 4% | 13 | 567 |
| Apr. 1, 2018–Jun. 30, 2018 | 4% | 13 | 567 | 5% | 15 | 569 |
| Jul. 1, 2018–Sep. 30, 2018 | 4% | 13 | 567 | 5% | 15 | 569 |
| Oct. 1, 2018–Dec. 31, 2018 | 4% | 13 | 567 | 5% | 15 | 569 |
| Jan. 1, 2019–Mar. 31, 2019 | 5% | 15 | 569 | 6% | 17 | 571 |
| Apr. 1, 2019–Jun. 30, 2019 | 5% | 15 | 569 | 6% | 17 | 571 |
| Jul. 1, 2019–Sep. 30, 2019 | 4% | 13 | 567 | 5% | 15 | 569 |
| Oct. 1, 2019–Dec. 31, 2019 | 4% | 13 | 567 | 5% | 15 | 569 |
| Jan. 1, 2020–Mar. 31, 2020 | 4% | 61 | 615 | 5% | 63 | 617 |
| Apr. 1, 2020–Jun. 30, 2020 | 4% | 61 | 615 | 5% | 63 | 617 |
| Jul. 1, 2020–Sep. 30, 2020 | 2% | 57 | 611 | 3% | 59 | 613 |
| Oct. 1, 2020–Dec. 31, 2020 | 2% | 57 | 611 | 3% | 59 | 613 |
| Jan. 1, 2021–Mar. 31, 2021 | 2% | 9 | 563 | 3% | 11 | 565 |
| Apr. 1, 2021–Jun. 30, 2021 | 2% | 9 | 563 | 3% | 11 | 565 |
| Jul. 1, 2021–Sep. 30, 2021 | 2% | 9 | 563 | 3% | 11 | 565 |
| Oct. 1, 2021–Dec. 31, 2021 | 2% | 9 | 563 | 3% | 11 | 565 |
| Jan. 1, 2022–Mar. 31, 2022 | 2% | 9 | 563 | 3% | 11 | 565 |
| Apr. 1, 2022–Jun. 30, 2022 | 3% | 11 | 565 | 4% | 13 | 567 |
| Jul. 1, 2022–Sep. 30, 2022 | 4% | 13 | 567 | 5% | 15 | 569 |
| Oct. 1, 2022–Dec. 31, 2022 | 5% | 15 | 569 | 6% | 17 | 571 |
| Jan. 1, 2023–Mar. 31, 2023 | 6% | 17 | 571 | 7% | 19 | 573 |
| Apr. 1, 2023–Jun. 30, 2023 | 6% | 17 | 571 | 7% | 19 | 573 |
| Jul. 1, 2023–Sep. 30, 2023 | 6% | 17 | 571 | 7% | 19 | 573 |
| Oct. 1, 2023–Dec. 31, 2023 | 7% | 19 | 573 | 8% | 21 | 575 |
| Jan. 1, 2024–Mar. 31, 2024 | 7% | 67 | 621 | 8% | 69 | 623 |
| Apr. 1, 2024–Jun. 30, 2024 | 7% | 67 | 621 | 8% | 69 | 623 |
| Jul. 1, 2024–Sep. 30, 2024 | 7% | 67 | 621 | 8% | 69 | 623 |
| Oct. 1, 2024–Dec. 31, 2024 | 7% | 67 | 621 | 8% | 69 | 623 |
| Jan. 1, 2025–Mar. 31, 2025 | 6% | 17 | 571 | 7% | 19 | 573 |
| Apr. 1, 2025–Jun. 30, 2025 | 6% | 17 | 571 | 7% | 19 | 573 |
| Jul. 1, 2025–Sep. 30, 2025 | 6% | 17 | 571 | 7% | 19 | 573 |
| Oct. 1, 2025–Dec. 31, 2025 | 6% | 17 | 571 | 7% | 19 | 573 |
| Jan. 1, 2026–Mar. 31, 2026 | 6% | 17 | 571 | 7% | 19 | 573 |
| Apr. 1, 2026–Jun. 30, 2026 | 5% | 15 | 569 | 6% | 17 | 571 |
| Jul. 1, 2026–Sep. 30, 2026 | 6% | 17 | 571 | 7% | 19 | 573 |
TABLE OF INTEREST RATES FOR LARGE CORPORATE UNDERPAYMENTS FROM JANUARY 1, 1991 – PRESENT
| 1995-1 C.B. | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| PERIOD | RATE | TABLE | PG |
| Jan. 1, 1991–Mar. 31, 1991 | 13% | 31 | 585 |
| Apr. 1, 1991–Jun. 30, 1991 | 12% | 29 | 583 |
| Jul. 1, 1991–Sep. 30, 1991 | 12% | 29 | 583 |
| Oct. 1, 1991–Dec. 31, 1991 | 12% | 29 | 583 |
| Jan. 1, 1992–Mar. 31, 1992 | 11% | 75 | 629 |
| Apr. 1, 1992–Jun. 30, 1992 | 10% | 73 | 627 |
| Jul. 1, 1992–Sep. 30, 1992 | 10% | 73 | 627 |
| Oct. 1, 1992–Dec. 31, 1992 | 9% | 71 | 625 |
| Jan. 1, 1993–Mar. 31, 1993 | 9% | 23 | 577 |
| Apr. 1, 1993–Jun. 30, 1993 | 9% | 23 | 577 |
| Jul. 1, 1993–Sep. 30, 1993 | 9% | 23 | 577 |
| Oct. 1, 1993–Dec. 31, 1993 | 9% | 23 | 577 |
| Jan. 1, 1994–Mar. 31, 1994 | 9% | 23 | 577 |
| Apr. 1, 1994–Jun. 30, 1994 | 9% | 23 | 577 |
| Jul. 1, 1994–Sep. 30, 1994 | 10% | 25 | 579 |
| Oct. 1, 1994–Dec. 31, 1994 | 11% | 27 | 581 |
| Jan. 1, 1995–Jun. 30, 1995 | 11% | 27 | 581 |
| Apr. 1, 1995–Jun. 30, 1995 | 12% | 29 | 583 |
| Jul. 1, 1995–Sep. 30, 1995 | 11% | 27 | 581 |
| Oct. 1, 1995–Dec. 31, 1995 | 11% | 27 | 581 |
| Jan. 1, 1996–Mar. 31, 1996 | 11% | 75 | 629 |
| Apr. 1, 1996–Jun. 30, 1996 | 10% | 73 | 627 |
| Jul. 1, 1996–Sep. 30, 1996 | 11% | 75 | 629 |
| Oct. 1, 1996–Dec. 31, 1996 | 11% | 75 | 629 |
| Jan. 1, 1997–Mar. 31, 1997 | 11% | 27 | 581 |
| Apr. 1, 1997–Jun. 30, 1997 | 11% | 27 | 581 |
| Jul. 1, 1997–Sep. 30, 1997 | 11% | 27 | 581 |
| Oct. 1, 1997–Dec. 31, 1997 | 11% | 27 | 581 |
| Jan. 1, 1998–Mar. 31, 1998 | 11% | 27 | 581 |
| Apr. 1, 1998–Jun. 30, 1998 | 10% | 25 | 579 |
| Jul. 1, 1998–Sep. 30, 1998 | 10% | 25 | 579 |
| Oct. 1, 1998–Dec. 31, 1998 | 10% | 25 | 579 |
| Jan. 1, 1999–Mar. 31, 1999 | 9% | 23 | 577 |
| Apr. 1, 1999–Jun. 30, 1999 | 10% | 25 | 579 |
| Jul. 1, 1999–Sep. 30, 1999 | 10% | 25 | 579 |
| Oct. 1, 1999–Dec. 31, 1999 | 10% | 25 | 579 |
| Jan. 1, 2000–Mar. 31, 2000 | 10% | 73 | 627 |
| Apr. 1, 2000–Jun. 30, 2000 | 11% | 75 | 629 |
| Jul. 1, 2000–Sep. 30, 2000 | 11% | 75 | 629 |
| Oct. 1, 2000–Dec. 31, 2000 | 11% | 75 | 629 |
| Jan. 1, 2001–Mar. 31, 2001 | 11% | 27 | 581 |
| Apr. 1, 2001–Jun. 30, 2001 | 10% | 25 | 579 |
| Jul. 1, 2001–Sep. 30, 2001 | 9% | 23 | 577 |
| Oct. 1, 2001–Dec. 31, 2001 | 9% | 23 | 577 |
| Jan. 1, 2002–Mar. 31, 2002 | 8% | 21 | 575 |
| Apr. 1, 2002–Sep. 30, 2002 | 8% | 21 | 575 |
| Jul. 1, 2002–Sep. 30, 2002 | 8% | 21 | 575 |
| Oct. 1, 2002–Dec. 31, 2002 | 8% | 21 | 575 |
| Jan. 1, 2003–Mar. 31, 2003 | 7% | 19 | 573 |
| Apr. 1, 2003–Jun. 30, 2003 | 7% | 19 | 573 |
| Jul. 1, 2003–Sep. 30, 2003 | 7% | 19 | 573 |
| Oct. 1, 2003–Dec. 31, 2003 | 6% | 17 | 571 |
| Jan. 1, 2004–Mar. 31, 2004 | 6% | 65 | 619 |
| Apr. 1, 2004–Jun. 30, 2004 | 7% | 67 | 621 |
| Jul. 1, 2004–Sep. 30, 2004 | 6% | 65 | 619 |
| Oct. 1, 2004–Dec. 31, 2004 | 7% | 67 | 621 |
| Jan. 1, 2005–Mar. 31, 2005 | 7% | 19 | 573 |
| Apr. 1, 2005–Jun. 30, 2005 | 8% | 21 | 575 |
| Jul. 1, 2005–Sep. 30, 2005 | 8% | 21 | 575 |
| Oct. 1, 2005–Dec. 31, 2005 | 9% | 23 | 577 |
| Jan. 1, 2006–Mar. 31, 2006 | 9% | 23 | 577 |
| Apr. 1, 2006–Jun. 30, 2006 | 9% | 23 | 577 |
| Jul. 1, 2006–Sep. 30, 2006 | 10% | 25 | 579 |
| Oct. 1, 2006–Dec. 31, 2006 | 10% | 25 | 579 |
| Jan. 1, 2007–Mar. 31, 2007 | 10% | 25 | 579 |
| Apr. 1, 2007–Jun. 30, 2007 | 10% | 25 | 579 |
| Jul. 1, 2007–Sep. 30, 2007 | 10% | 25 | 579 |
| Oct. 1, 2007–Dec. 31, 2007 | 10% | 25 | 579 |
| Jan. 1, 2008–Mar. 31, 2008 | 9% | 71 | 625 |
| Apr. 1, 2008–Sep. 30, 2008 | 8% | 69 | 623 |
| Jul. 1, 2008–Sep. 30, 2008 | 7% | 67 | 621 |
| Oct. 1, 2008–Dec. 31, 2008 | 8% | 69 | 623 |
| Jan. 1, 2009–Mar. 31, 2009 | 7% | 19 | 573 |
| Apr. 1, 2009–Jun. 30, 2009 | 6% | 17 | 571 |
| Jul. 1, 2009–Sep. 30, 2009 | 6% | 17 | 571 |
| Oct. 1, 2009–Dec. 31, 2009 | 6% | 17 | 571 |
| Jan. 1, 2010–Mar. 31, 2010 | 6% | 17 | 571 |
| Apr. 1, 2010–Jun. 30, 2010 | 6% | 17 | 571 |
| Jul. 1, 2010–Sep. 30, 2010 | 6% | 17 | 571 |
| Oct. 1, 2010–Dec. 31, 2010 | 6% | 17 | 571 |
| Jan. 1, 2011–Mar. 31, 2011 | 5% | 15 | 569 |
| Apr. 1, 2011–Jun. 30, 2011 | 6% | 17 | 571 |
| Jul. 1, 2011–Sep. 30, 2011 | 6% | 17 | 571 |
| Oct. 1, 2011–Dec. 31, 2011 | 5% | 15 | 569 |
| Jan. 1, 2012–Mar. 31, 2012 | 5% | 63 | 617 |
| Apr. 1, 2012–Jun. 30, 2012 | 5% | 63 | 617 |
| Jul. 1, 2012–Sep. 30, 2012 | 5% | 63 | 617 |
| Oct. 1, 2012–Dec. 31, 2012 | 5% | 63 | 617 |
| Jan. 1, 2013–Mar. 31, 2013 | 5% | 15 | 569 |
| Apr. 1, 2013–Jun. 30, 2013 | 5% | 15 | 569 |
| Jul. 1, 2013–Sep. 30, 2013 | 5% | 15 | 569 |
| Oct. 1, 2013–Dec. 31, 2013 | 5% | 15 | 569 |
| Jan. 1, 2014–Mar. 31, 2014 | 5% | 15 | 569 |
| Apr. 1, 2014–Jun. 30, 2014 | 5% | 15 | 569 |
| Jul. 1, 2014–Sep. 30, 2014 | 5% | 15 | 569 |
| Oct. 1, 2014–Dec. 31, 2014 | 5% | 15 | 569 |
| Jan. 1, 2015–Mar. 31, 2015 | 5% | 15 | 569 |
| Apr. 1, 2015–Jun. 30, 2015 | 5% | 15 | 569 |
| Jul. 1, 2015–Sep. 30, 2015 | 5% | 15 | 569 |
| Oct. 1, 2015–Dec. 31, 2015 | 5% | 15 | 569 |
| Jan. 1, 2016–Mar. 31, 2016 | 5% | 63 | 617 |
| Apr. 1, 2016–Jun. 30, 2016 | 6% | 65 | 619 |
| Jul. 1, 2016–Sep. 30, 2016 | 6% | 65 | 619 |
| Oct. 1, 2016–Dec. 31, 2016 | 6% | 65 | 619 |
| Jan. 1, 2017–Mar. 31, 2017 | 6% | 17 | 571 |
| Apr. 1, 2017–Jun. 30, 2017 | 6% | 17 | 571 |
| Jul. 1, 2017–Sep. 30, 2017 | 6% | 17 | 571 |
| Oct. 1, 2017–Dec. 31, 2017 | 6% | 17 | 571 |
| Jan. 1, 2018–Mar. 31, 2018 | 6% | 17 | 571 |
| Apr. 1, 2018–Jun. 30, 2018 | 7% | 19 | 573 |
| Jul. 1, 2018–Sep. 30, 2018 | 7% | 19 | 573 |
| Oct. 1, 2018–Dec. 31, 2018 | 7% | 19 | 573 |
| Jan. 1, 2019–Mar. 31, 2019 | 8% | 21 | 575 |
| Apr. 1, 2019–Jun. 30, 2019 | 8% | 21 | 575 |
| Jul. 1, 2019–Sep. 30, 2019 | 7% | 19 | 573 |
| Oct. 1, 2019–Dec. 31, 2019 | 7% | 19 | 573 |
| Jan. 1, 2020–Mar. 31, 2020 | 7% | 67 | 621 |
| Apr. 1, 2020–Jun. 30, 2020 | 7% | 67 | 621 |
| Jul. 1, 2020–Sep. 30, 2020 | 5% | 63 | 617 |
| Oct. 1, 2020–Dec. 31, 2020 | 5% | 63 | 617 |
| Jan. 1, 2021–Mar. 31, 2021 | 5% | 15 | 569 |
| Apr. 1, 2021–Jun. 30, 2021 | 5% | 15 | 569 |
| Jul. 1, 2021–Sep. 30, 2021 | 5% | 15 | 569 |
| Oct. 1, 2021–Dec. 31, 2021 | 5% | 15 | 569 |
| Jan. 1, 2022–Mar. 31, 2022 | 5% | 15 | 569 |
| Apr. 1, 2022–Jun. 30, 2022 | 6% | 17 | 571 |
| Jul. 1, 2022–Sep. 30, 2022 | 7% | 19 | 573 |
| Oct. 1, 2022–Dec. 31, 2022 | 8% | 21 | 575 |
| Jan. 1, 2023–Mar. 31, 2023 | 9% | 23 | 577 |
| Apr. 1, 2023–Jun. 30, 2023 | 9% | 23 | 577 |
| Jul. 1, 2023–Sep. 30, 2023 | 9% | 23 | 577 |
| Oct. 1, 2023–Dec. 31, 2023 | 10% | 25 | 579 |
| Jan. 1, 2024–Mar. 31, 2024 | 10% | 73 | 627 |
| Apr. 1, 2024–Jun. 30, 2024 | 10% | 73 | 627 |
| Jul. 1, 2024–Sep. 30, 2024 | 10% | 73 | 627 |
| Oct. 1, 2024–Dec. 31, 2024 | 10% | 73 | 627 |
| Jan. 1, 2025–Mar. 31, 2025 | 9% | 23 | 577 |
| Apr. 1, 2025–Jun. 30, 2025 | 9% | 23 | 577 |
| Jul. 1, 2025–Sep. 30, 2025 | 9% | 23 | 577 |
| Oct. 1, 2025–Dec. 31, 2025 | 9% | 23 | 577 |
| Jan. 1, 2026–Mar. 31, 2026 | 9% | 23 | 577 |
| Apr. 1, 2026–Jun. 30, 2026 | 8% | 21 | 575 |
| Jul. 1, 2026–Sep. 30, 2026 | 9% | 23 | 577 |
TABLE OF INTEREST RATES FOR CORPORATE OVERPAYMENTS EXCEEDING $10,000 FROM JANUARY 1, 1995 – PRESENT
| 1995-1 C.B. | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| PERIOD | RATE | TABLE | PG |
| Jan. 1, 1995–Mar. 31, 1995 | 6.5% | 18 | 572 |
| Apr. 1, 1995–Jun. 30, 1995 | 7.5% | 20 | 574 |
| Jul. 1, 1995–Sep. 30, 1995 | 6.5% | 18 | 572 |
| Oct. 1, 1995–Dec. 31, 1995 | 6.5% | 18 | 572 |
| Jan. 1, 1996–Mar. 31, 1996 | 6.5% | 66 | 620 |
| Apr. 1, 1996–Jun. 30, 1996 | 5.5% | 64 | 618 |
| Jul. 1, 1996–Sep. 30, 1996 | 6.5% | 66 | 620 |
| Oct. 1, 1996–Dec. 31, 1996 | 6.5% | 66 | 620 |
| Jan. 1, 1997–Mar. 31, 1997 | 6.5% | 18 | 572 |
| Apr. 1, 1997–Jun. 30, 1997 | 6.5% | 18 | 572 |
| Jul. 1, 1997–Sep. 30, 1997 | 6.5% | 18 | 572 |
| Oct. 1, 1997–Dec. 31, 1997 | 6.5% | 18 | 572 |
| Jan. 1, 1998–Mar. 31, 1998 | 6.5% | 18 | 572 |
| Apr. 1, 1998–Jun. 30, 1998 | 5.5% | 16 | 570 |
| Jul. 1, 1998–Sep. 30, 1998 | 5.5% | 16 | 570 |
| Oct. 1, 1998–Dec. 31, 1998 | 5.5% | 16 | 570 |
| Jan. 1, 1999–Mar. 31, 1999 | 4.5% | 14 | 568 |
| Apr. 1, 1999–Sep. 30, 1999 | 5.5% | 16 | 570 |
| Jul. 1, 1999–Sep. 30, 1999 | 5.5% | 16 | 570 |
| Oct. 1, 1999–Dec. 31, 1999 | 5.5% | 16 | 570 |
| Jan. 1, 2000–Mar. 31, 2000 | 5.5% | 64 | 618 |
| Apr. 1, 2000–Jun. 30, 2000 | 6.5% | 66 | 620 |
| Jul. 1, 2000–Sep. 30, 2000 | 6.5% | 66 | 620 |
| Oct. 1, 2000–Dec. 31, 2000 | 6.5% | 66 | 620 |
| Jan. 1, 2001–Mar. 31, 2001 | 6.5% | 18 | 572 |
| Apr. 1, 2001–Jun. 30, 2001 | 5.5% | 16 | 570 |
| Jul. 1, 2001–Sep. 30, 2001 | 4.5% | 14 | 568 |
| Oct. 1, 2001–Dec. 31, 2001 | 4.5% | 14 | 568 |
| Jan. 1, 2002–Mar. 31, 2002 | 3.5% | 12 | 566 |
| Apr. 1, 2002–Jun. 30, 2002 | 3.5% | 12 | 566 |
| Jul. 1, 2002–Sep. 30, 2002 | 3.5% | 12 | 566 |
| Oct. 1, 2002–Dec. 31, 2002 | 3.5% | 12 | 566 |
| Jan. 1, 2003–Mar. 31, 2003 | 2.5% | 10 | 564 |
| Apr. 1, 2003–Jun. 30, 2003 | 2.5% | 10 | 564 |
| Jul. 1, 2003–Sep. 30, 2003 | 2.5% | 10 | 564 |
| Oct. 1, 2003–Dec. 31, 2003 | 1.5% | 8 | 562 |
| Jan. 1, 2004–Mar. 31, 2004 | 1.5% | 56 | 610 |
| Apr. 1, 2004–Jun. 30, 2004 | 2.5% | 58 | 612 |
| Jul. 1, 2004–Sep. 30, 2004 | 1.5% | 56 | 610 |
| Oct. 1, 2004–Dec. 31, 2004 | 2.5% | 58 | 612 |
| Jan. 1, 2005–Mar. 31, 2005 | 2.5% | 10 | 564 |
| Apr. 1, 2005–Jun. 30, 2005 | 3.5% | 12 | 566 |
| Jul. 1, 2005–Sep. 30, 2005 | 3.5% | 12 | 566 |
| Oct. 1, 2005–Dec. 31, 2005 | 4.5% | 14 | 568 |
| Jan. 1, 2006–Mar. 31, 2006 | 4.5% | 14 | 568 |
| Apr. 1, 2006–Jun. 30, 2006 | 4.5% | 14 | 568 |
| Jul. 1, 2006–Sep. 30, 2006 | 5.5% | 16 | 570 |
| Oct. 1, 2006–Dec. 31, 2006 | 5.5% | 16 | 570 |
| Jan. 1, 2007–Mar. 31, 2007 | 5.5% | 16 | 570 |
| Apr. 1, 2007–Jun. 30, 2007 | 5.5% | 16 | 570 |
| Jul. 1, 2007–Sep. 30, 2007 | 5.5% | 16 | 570 |
| Oct. 1, 2007–Dec. 31, 2007 | 5.5% | 16 | 570 |
| Jan. 1, 2008–Mar. 31, 2008 | 4.5% | 62 | 616 |
| Apr. 1, 2008–Jun. 30, 2008 | 3.5% | 60 | 614 |
| Jul. 1, 2008–Sep. 30, 2008 | 2.5% | 58 | 612 |
| Oct. 1, 2008–Dec. 31, 2008 | 3.5% | 60 | 614 |
| Jan. 1, 2009–Mar. 31, 2009 | 2.5% | 10 | 564 |
| Apr. 1, 2009–Jun. 30, 2009 | 1.5% | 8 | 562 |
| Jul. 1, 2009–Sep. 30, 2009 | 1.5% | 8 | 562 |
| Oct. 1, 2009–Dec. 31, 2009 | 1.5% | 8 | 562 |
| Jan. 1, 2010–Mar. 31, 2010 | 1.5% | 8 | 562 |
| Apr. 1, 2010–Jun. 30, 2010 | 1.5% | 8 | 562 |
| Jul. 1, 2010–Sep. 30, 2010 | 1.5% | 8 | 562 |
| Oct. 1, 2010–Dec. 31, 2010 | 1.5% | 8 | 562 |
| Jan. 1, 2011–Mar. 31, 2011 | 0.5%* | ||
| Apr. 1, 2011–Jun. 30, 2011 | 1.5% | 8 | 562 |
| Jul. 1, 2011–Sep. 30, 2011 | 1.5% | 8 | 562 |
| Oct. 1, 2011–Dec. 31, 2011 | 0.5%* | ||
| Jan. 1, 2012–Mar. 31, 2012 | 0.5%* | ||
| Apr. 1, 2012–Jun. 30, 2012 | 0.5%* | ||
| Jul. 1, 2012–Sep. 30, 2012 | 0.5%* | ||
| Oct. 1, 2012–Dec. 31, 2012 | 0.5%* | ||
| Jan. 1, 2013–Mar. 31, 2013 | 0.5%* | ||
| Apr. 1, 2013–Jun. 30, 2013 | 0.5%* | ||
| Jul. 1, 2013–Sep. 30, 2013 | 0.5%* | ||
| Oct. 1, 2013–Dec. 31, 2013 | 0.5%* | ||
| Jan. 1, 2014–Mar. 31, 2014 | 0.5%* | ||
| Apr. 1, 2014–Jun. 30, 2014 | 0.5%* | ||
| Jul. 1, 2014–Sep. 30, 2014 | 0.5%* | ||
| Oct. 1, 2014–Dec. 31, 2014 | 0.5%* | ||
| Jan. 1, 2015–Mar. 31, 2015 | 0.5%* | ||
| Apr. 1, 2015–Jun. 30, 2015 | 0.5%* | ||
| Jul. 1, 2015–Sep. 30, 2015 | 0.5%* | ||
| Oct. 1, 2015–Dec. 31, 2015 | 0.5%* | ||
| Jan. 1, 2016–Mar. 31, 2016 | 0.5%* | ||
| Apr. 1, 2016–Jun. 30, 2016 | 1.5% | 56 | 610 |
| Jul. 1, 2016–Sep. 30, 2016 | 1.5% | 56 | 610 |
| Oct. 1, 2016–Dec. 31, 2016 | 1.5% | 56 | 610 |
| Jan. 1, 2017–Mar. 31, 2017 | 1.5% | 8 | 562 |
| Apr. 1, 2017–Jun. 30, 2017 | 1.5% | 8 | 562 |
| Jul. 1, 2017–Sep. 30, 2017 | 1.5% | 8 | 562 |
| Oct. 1, 2017–Dec. 31, 2017 | 1.5% | 8 | 562 |
| Jan. 1, 2018–Mar. 31, 2018 | 1.5% | 8 | 562 |
| Apr. 1, 2018–Jun. 30, 2018 | 2.5% | 10 | 564 |
| Jul. 1, 2018–Sep. 30, 2018 | 2.5% | 10 | 564 |
| Oct. 1, 2018–Dec. 31, 2018 | 2.5% | 10 | 564 |
| Jan. 1, 2019–Mar. 31, 2019 | 3.5% | 12 | 566 |
| Apr. 1, 2019–Jun. 30, 2019 | 3.5% | 12 | 566 |
| Jul. 1, 2019–Sep. 30, 2019 | 2.5% | 10 | 564 |
| Oct. 1, 2019–Dec. 31, 2019 | 2.5% | 10 | 564 |
| Jan. 1, 2020–Mar. 31, 2020 | 2.5% | 58 | 612 |
| Apr. 1, 2020–Jun. 30, 2020 | 2.5% | 58 | 612 |
| Jul. 1, 2020–Sep. 30, 2020 | 0.5%* | ||
| Oct. 1, 2020–Dec. 31, 2020 | 0.5%* | ||
| Jan. 1, 2021–Mar. 31, 2021 | 0.5%* | ||
| Apr. 1, 2021–Jun. 30, 2021 | 0.5%* | ||
| Jul. 1, 2021–Sep. 30, 2021 | 0.5%* | ||
| Oct. 1, 2021–Dec. 31, 2021 | 0.5%* | ||
| Jan. 1, 2022–Mar. 31, 2022 | 0.5%* | ||
| Apr. 1, 2022–Jun. 30, 2022 | 1.5% | 8 | 562 |
| Jul. 1, 2022–Sep. 30, 2022 | 2.5% | 10 | 564 |
| Oct. 1, 2022–Dec. 31, 2022 | 3.5% | 12 | 566 |
| Jan. 1, 2023–Mar. 31, 2023 | 4.5% | 14 | 568 |
| Apr. 1, 2023–Jun. 30, 2023 | 4.5% | 14 | 568 |
| Jul. 1, 2023–Sep. 30, 2023 | 4.5% | 14 | 568 |
| Oct. 1, 2023–Dec. 31, 2023 | 5.5% | 16 | 570 |
| Jan. 1, 2024–Mar. 31, 2024 | 5.5% | 64 | 618 |
| Apr. 1, 2024–Jun. 30, 2024 | 5.5% | 64 | 618 |
| Jul. 1, 2024–Sep. 30, 2024 | 5.5% | 64 | 618 |
| Oct. 1, 2024–Dec. 31, 2024 | 5.5% | 64 | 618 |
| Jan. 1, 2025–Mar. 31, 2025 | 4.5% | 14 | 568 |
| Apr. 1, 2025–Jun. 30, 2025 | 4.5% | 14 | 568 |
| Jul. 1, 2025–Sep. 30, 2025 | 4.5% | 14 | 568 |
| Oct. 1, 2025–Dec. 31, 2025 | 4.5% | 14 | 568 |
| Jan. 1, 2026–Mar. 31, 2026 | 4.5% | 14 | 568 |
| Apr. 1, 2026–Jun. 30, 2026 | 3.5% | 12 | 566 |
| Jul. 1, 2026–Sep. 30, 2026 | 4.5% | 14 | 568 |
* The asterisk reflects the interest factors for daily compound interest for annual rates of 0.5 percent published in Appendix A of this Revenue Ruling.
This notice publishes the inflation adjustment factor for the credit for carbon oxide sequestration under § 45Q of the Internal Revenue Code (§ 45Q credit) for calendar year 2026.1 The inflation adjustment factor is used to determine the amount of the credit allowable under § 45Q for taxpayers that make an election under § 45Q(b)(3) to have the dollar amounts applicable under § 45Q(a)(1) or (2) apply.
Section 45Q was added to the Code by § 115 of the Energy Improvement and Extension Act of 2008, enacted as Division B of Pub. L. 110-343, 122 Stat. 3765, 3829 (October 3, 2008), to provide a credit for the sequestration of carbon dioxide. Section 45Q was amended by § 1131 of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Tax Act of 2009, enacted as Division B of Pub. L. 111-5, 123 Stat 115 (February 17, 2009), § 41119 of the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2018 (BBA), Pub. L. No. 115-123 (February 9, 2018), § 121 of the Taxpayer Certainty and Disaster Tax Relief Act of 2020, enacted as Division EE of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2021, Pub. L. 116-260, 134 Stat. 3051 (December 27, 2020), § 13104 of Pub. L. 117-169, 136 Stat. 1818 (August 16, 2022), commonly known as the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA), and § 70522 of Pub. L. 119-21, 139 Stat. 72 (July 4, 2025), commonly known as the One, Big, Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA).
Section 45Q(a)(1) allows a credit of $20 per metric ton of qualified carbon oxide (i) captured by the taxpayer using carbon capture equipment which is originally placed in service at a qualified facility before the date of the enactment of the BBA, (ii) disposed of by the taxpayer in secure geological storage, and (iii) not used by the taxpayer as a tertiary injectant in a qualified enhanced oil or natural gas recovery project.
Section 45Q(a)(2) allows a credit of $10 per metric ton of qualified carbon oxide (i) captured by the taxpayer using carbon capture equipment which is originally placed in service at a qualified facility before the date of the enactment of the BBA, and (ii) either (I) used by the taxpayer as a tertiary injectant in a qualified enhanced oil or natural gas recovery project and disposed of by the taxpayer in secure geological storage or (II) utilized by the taxpayer in a manner described in § 45Q(f)(5).
Section 45Q(b)(3) provides that, for purposes of determining the carbon oxide sequestration credit under this section, a taxpayer may elect to have the dollar amounts applicable under § 45Q(a)(1) or (2) apply in lieu of the dollar amounts applicable under § 45Q(a)(3) or (4) for each metric ton of qualified carbon oxide which is captured by the taxpayer using carbon capture equipment which is originally placed in service at a qualified facility on or after the date of the enactment of the BBA.
Notice 2022-38 provided that 2022 was the final calendar year for which a taxpayer may claim a § 45Q credit under § 45Q(a)(1) and (2) for qualified carbon oxide that is captured by carbon capture equipment originally placed in service at a qualified facility before the date of enactment of the BBA. Therefore, the inflation adjustment amounts in section 3 of this notice only apply if a taxpayer elects under § 45Q(b)(3) to apply the dollar amounts applicable under § 45Q(a)(1) or (2) in lieu of the dollar amounts applicable under § 45Q(a)(3) or (4).
Under § 45Q(f)(7), for taxable years beginning in a calendar year after 2009, the dollar amounts contained in § 45Q(a)(1) and (2) must be adjusted for inflation by multiplying such dollar amount by the inflation adjustment factor for such calendar year determined under § 43(b)(3)(B), determined by substituting “2008” for “1990.”
Section 43(b)(3)(B) defines the term “inflation adjustment factor” as, with respect to any calendar year, a fraction the numerator of which is the GNP implicit price deflator for the preceding calendar year and the denominator of which is the GNP implicit price deflator for 1990. For purposes of § 45Q(f)(7), for the 2025 calendar year, the inflation adjustment factor is a fraction the numerator of which is the GNP implicit price deflator for 2025 (128.888) and the denominator of which is the GNP implicit price deflator for 2008 (88.046).
The inflation adjustment factor for calendar year 2026 is 1.4639. The § 45Q credit for calendar year 2026 is $29.28 per metric ton of qualified carbon oxide under § 45Q(a)(1) and $14.64 per metric ton of qualified carbon oxide under § 45Q(a)(2).
The principal author of this notice is the Office of Associate Chief Counsel (Energy, Credits, and Excise). For further information regarding this notice contact (202) 317-6853 (not a toll-free number).
1 Unless otherwise specified, all “section” or “§” references are to sections of the Internal Revenue Code or the Temporary Regulations under Title II of the Omnibus Reconciliation Act of 1980 (26 CFR part 6a).
This notice publishes the reference price under § 45K(d)(2)(C) of the Internal Revenue Code for calendar year 2025.1 The credit period for the nonconventional source production credit under § 45K ended on December 31, 2013, for facilities producing coke or coke gas (other than from petroleum-based products). However, the reference price continues to apply in determining the amount of the enhanced oil recovery credit under § 43, the marginal well production credit for qualified crude oil production under § 45I, and the applicable percentage under § 613A to be used in determining percentage depletion in the case of oil and natural gas produced from marginal properties.
Section 45K(d)(2)(C) provides that the term “reference price” means, with respect to a calendar year, the Secretary’s estimate of the annual average wellhead price per barrel for all domestic crude oil the price of which is not subject to regulation by the United States.
Section 43(a) provides that, for purposes of § 38, the enhanced oil recovery credit for any taxable year is an amount equal to 15 percent of the taxpayer’s qualified enhanced oil recovery costs for such taxable year.
Section 43(b)(1) provides that the amount of enhanced oil recovery credit for any taxable year shall be reduced by an amount which bears the same ratio to the amount of such credit (determined without regard to this paragraph) as - (A) the amount by which the reference price for the calendar year preceding the calendar year in which the taxable year begins exceeds $28, bears to (B) $6. Section 43(b)(2) provides that the term “reference price” means, with respect to any calendar year, the reference price determined for such calendar year under § 45K(d)(2)(C).
Section 45I(a) provides that, for purposes of § 38, the marginal well production credit for any taxable year is an amount equal to the product of the credit amount and the qualified crude oil production and the qualified natural gas production which is attributable to the taxpayer.
Section 45I(b)(1) provides that for crude oil production, the amount of the marginal well production credit is $3 per barrel of qualified crude oil production.
Section 45I(b)(2) provides that the $3 amount under § 45I(b)(1) shall be reduced (but not below zero) by an amount which bears the same ratio to such amount (determined without regard to this paragraph) as – (i) the excess (if any) of the applicable reference price over $15, bears to (ii) $3. The applicable reference price for a taxable year is the reference price of the calendar year preceding the calendar year in which the taxable year begins.
Section 45I(b)(2)(C) provides that for qualified crude oil production the term “reference price” means, with respect to any calendar year, the reference price determined under § 45K(d)(2)(C).
Section 613A(c)(6)(A) provides, in general, that the allowance for depletion under § 611 shall be computed in accordance with § 613 with respect to - (i) so much of the taxpayer’s average daily marginal production of domestic crude oil as does not exceed the taxpayer’s depletable oil quantity (determined without regard to paragraph (3)(A)(ii)), and (ii) so much of the taxpayer’s average daily marginal production of domestic natural gas as does not exceed the taxpayer’s depletable natural gas quantity (determined without regard to paragraph (3)(A)(ii)), and the applicable percentage shall be deemed to be specified in subsection (b) of § 613 for purposes of subsection (a) of that section.
Section 613A(c)(6)(C) provides that the term “applicable percentage” means the percentage (not greater than 25 percent) equal to the sum of - (i) 15 percent, plus (ii) 1 percentage point for each whole dollar by which $20 exceeds the reference price for crude oil for the calendar year preceding the calendar year in which the taxable year begins. For purposes of this paragraph, the term “reference price” means, with respect to any calendar year, the reference price determined for such calendar year under § 45K(d)(2)(C).
The reference price under § 45K(d)(2)(C) for calendar year 2025 is $63.40.
The principal author of this notice is the Office of Associate Chief Counsel (Energy, Credits, and Excise). For further information regarding this notice, contact (202) 317-6853 (not a toll-free number).
1 Unless otherwise specified, all “section” references will be to the Internal Revenue Code, as amended, or the Income Tax Regulations.
This revenue procedure describes a program for letter rulings with respect to certain issues solely under the jurisdiction of the Associate Chief Counsel (Corporate). This program does not diminish the availability of letter rulings under existing programs.
This revenue procedure modifies and amplifies Rev. Proc. 2026-1, 2026-1 I.R.B. 1, which explains how the Internal Revenue Service (Service) provides advice to taxpayers on issues under the jurisdiction of the Associate Chief Counsel (Corporate). This revenue procedure also modifies and amplifies Rev. Proc. 2026-3, 2026-1 I.R.B. 143, which sets forth the areas of the Internal Revenue Code (Code)1 under the jurisdiction of the Associate Chief Counsel (Corporate) relating to issues on which the Service will not issue letter rulings.
.01 Prior Ruling Policy. As described in this section 3.01, the Service has taken various positions over time on issuing letter rulings on only part of an integrated transaction.
(1) Rev. Proc. 2001-3. Rev. Proc. 2001-3, 2001-1 I.R.B. 111, modified by Ann. 2001-25, 2001-11 I.R.B. 895, provided that the Service would not rule on whether a transaction qualifies under § 332, 351, 368(a)(1)(A), (B), (C), (E) or (F), or 1036, and whether various consequences (such as nonrecognition and basis) result from the application of that section, unless the Service determined that there was a significant issue that must be resolved in order to decide those matters. In that case, the Service would rule on the entire transaction and not just on the significant issue. See section 3.01(29) of Rev. Proc. 2001-3.
(2) Rev. Proc. 2009-25. Rev. Proc. 2009-25, 2009-24 I.R.B. 1088, announced a pilot program for letter rulings on issues arising in the context of distributions to which § 355 applies (§ 355 distributions). Under this program, a taxpayer could request a letter ruling on part of a larger transaction or on a particular issue under a Code section that a transaction presented. In turn, the Service would issue a letter ruling on the particular issue raised in the letter ruling request and not on any other issue (including, in some cases, qualification of the distribution under § 355) or on any other aspect of the transaction.
(3) Rev. Proc. 2013-32. Rev. Proc. 2013-32, 2013-28 I.R.B. 55, provided that the Service no longer would rule on (i) whether a transaction qualifies for nonrecognition treatment under § 332, 351, 355, or 1036, (ii) whether a transaction constitutes a reorganization within the meaning of § 368, or (iii) the various tax consequences resulting from the application of those Code sections. Instead, the Service would rule only on significant issues presented in transactions described in those Code sections (significant issue rulings). Rev. Proc. 2013-32 further provided that (i) the Service would not issue a letter ruling with respect to an issue that is clearly and adequately addressed by statute, regulations, decision of a court, or authority published in the Internal Revenue Bulletin (comfort ruling), but that (ii) except with respect to issues under §§ 332, 351, 355, 368, and 1036 and the tax consequences resulting from the application of those Code sections, an Associate office may, in its discretion, issue a comfort ruling if the Associate office is otherwise ruling on another issue arising in the same transaction. Rev. Proc. 2013-32 also provided that the pilot program announced in Rev. Proc. 2009-25 was discontinued.
(4) Rev. Proc. 2017-52. Rev. Proc. 2017-52, 2017-41 I.R.B. 283, provides procedures for requesting letter rulings regarding § 355 distributions. Rev. Proc. 2017-52 established a pilot program to issue letter rulings that address the general Federal income tax consequences of a § 355 distribution. Rev. Proc. 2017-52 also provides procedures for requesting such rulings and clarifies procedures for requesting rulings on significant issues presented in those transactions. Rev. Proc. 2017-52 modified and superseded a number of prior revenue procedures, including superseding Rev. Proc. 2009-25 and Rev. Proc. 2013-32.
(5) Rev. Proc. 2024-1 and Rev. Proc. 2024-3. Rev. Proc. 2024-1, 2024-1 I.R.B. 1, and Rev. Proc. 2024-3, 2024-1 I.R.B. 143, removed issues under §§ 332, 351, 368, and 1036 from the list of areas in which letter rulings ordinarily would not be issued, permitted the issuance of comfort rulings relating to transactions under §§ 332, 351, 355, 368, 1036, and related operative provisions, and ended the practice of issuing significant issue rulings, including with respect to § 355 distributions. See sections 6.11 and 16 of Rev. Proc. 2024-1; section 1.02 of Rev. Proc. 2024-3.
.02 Current Ruling Policy. The Service ordinarily will not issue a letter ruling on only part of an integrated transaction. However, if part of an integrated transaction falls under an area of the Code, including those under the jurisdiction of the Associate Chief Counsel (Corporate), on which the Service will not issue letter rulings, the Service may issue a letter ruling on other parts of the transaction. Section 6.03 of Rev. Proc. 2026-1; section 4.02(2) of Rev. Proc. 2026-3. If it is impossible for the Service to determine the tax consequences of an integrated transaction without resolving an issue on which the Service will not issue rulings (no-rule issue) involving a part of the transaction or a related transaction, the taxpayer must state in its letter ruling request to the best of its knowledge and belief the tax consequences of the no-rule issue. The Service’s letter ruling will state that the Service did not consider, and no opinion is expressed upon, that issue. In appropriate cases, notwithstanding the taxpayer’s representation, the Service may decline to issue a letter ruling on the integrated transaction due to the relevance of the no-rule issue. Section 2.03 of Rev. Proc. 2026-3.
In addition, except with respect to issues under §§ 332, 351, 355, 368, 1036, and related operative provisions, the Service ordinarily will not issue comfort rulings, but the Service may in its discretion decide to issue a comfort ruling if the Service is otherwise issuing a letter ruling to the taxpayer on another issue arising in the same transaction. Section 6.11 of Rev. Proc. 2026-1; section 4.02(9) of Rev. Proc. 2026-3.
Furthermore, the Service will not issue letter rulings on questions that the Service determines, in its discretion, should not be answered in the interest of sound tax administration, including due to resource constraints. Section 3.02(10) of Rev. Proc. 2026-3.
A taxpayer requesting a letter ruling solely or primarily under the jurisdiction of the Associate Chief Counsel (Corporate) may request fast-track processing, but not expedited handling, of that letter ruling request. However, expedited handling, but not fast-track processing, may be available for letter ruling requests that include a closing agreement with respect to an issue or letter ruling requests for an extension of time for making an election or other relief. Section 7.02(4) of Rev. Proc. 2026-1; Rev. Proc. 2023-26, 2023-33 I.R.B. 486.
.03 Feedback Requesting Significant Issue Rulings. The Service has received numerous informal comments from taxpayers and practitioners regarding the time required to process letter ruling requests and the scope of those letter ruling requests. Taxpayers and practitioners have recommended that the Service reinstate the practice of issuing significant issue rulings. To use Service resources more efficiently, and to increase the availability and timeliness of letter rulings, this revenue procedure establishes a significant issue ruling program to allow taxpayers to request rulings on one or more issues that—
(1) Are solely under the jurisdiction of the Associate Chief Counsel (Corporate);
(2) Are significant (as defined in section 4.02 of this revenue procedure); and
(3) Involve the tax consequences or characterization of a transaction (or part of a transaction) that is described in § 332, 351, 355, 368, or 1036.
.01 Significant Issue Ruling Program. Under the significant issue ruling program described in this revenue procedure, taxpayers may request, and the Service may issue, a ruling on part of an integrated transaction described in § 332, 351, 355, 368, or 1036. In addition, taxpayers may request, and the Service may issue, a ruling on a particular legal issue under a section of the Code or the Income Tax Regulations with respect to a transaction (or part thereof) rather than a ruling that addresses all aspects of that section (or any other section) with respect to the transaction (or part thereof). For example, the Service may issue a letter ruling addressing significant issues presented by the application of § 355(e), 1.368-1(d), or 1.368-2(k), even though the ruling does not address overall qualification of the transaction under § 355 or 368.
In addition, the Service may rule on the tax consequences (such as nonrecognition and basis) resulting from integrated transactions described in § 332, 351, 355, 368, or 1036 to the extent that a significant issue is presented under related Code sections that address such tax consequences. For example, a § 351 exchange that does not present any significant issues under § 351 may present a significant issue regarding the application of § 358 to the transferor in the exchange.
This revenue procedure does not limit the number of significant issues with respect to a transaction that may be the subject of a single letter ruling. However, the Service reserves the right to rule on any other issue related to the transaction (including ruling adversely) if the Service believes that doing so would be in the interest of sound tax administration.
If the Service issues a letter ruling on a significant issue under Rev. Proc. 2026-1 as modified and amplified by this revenue procedure, the letter ruling will state that no opinion is expressed as to the overall tax consequences of the transactions described in the letter ruling or as to any issue or step not specifically addressed by the letter ruling.
.02 Significant Issue. A significant issue is a germane and specific issue of law, provided that a ruling on the issue would not be a comfort ruling or the conclusion in such a ruling otherwise would not be essentially free from doubt. An issue is germane if resolution of the issue is necessary to determine an element of the tax treatment of the transaction. An issue is specific if it is the narrowest articulation of the germane issue. A change of circumstances arising after a transaction ordinarily does not present a significant issue with respect to the transaction.
.01 In General. Letter ruling requests submitted under Rev. Proc. 2026-1 as modified and amplified by this revenue procedure must comply with the requirements set forth in Rev. Proc. 2026-1, including the requirements of section 6.03 of Rev. Proc. 2026-1, as modified and amplified by this revenue procedure. All pertinent no-rule policies described in Rev. Proc. 2026-3, as modified and amplified by this revenue procedure, will govern requests for letter rulings made pursuant to this revenue procedure. For example, see section 3.01(66) of Rev. Proc. 2026-3 (no-rule policy regarding business purpose under § 355).
In preparing a letter ruling request under Rev. Proc. 2026-1 as modified and amplified by this revenue procedure, taxpayers should continue to consult other applicable revenue procedures. For example, see Rev. Proc. 2025-30, 2025-42 I.R.B. 489 and Rev. Proc. 2017-52. However, the letter ruling request must include the information and representations described in such revenue procedures (as applicable) only to the extent that they relate to the significant issue. Further, when a taxpayer is requesting a ruling regarding a significant issue under a section of the Code or the Income Tax Regulations (for example, § 355(e)), the taxpayer must provide a representation (to the best knowledge and belief of the taxpayer) that the transaction would otherwise satisfy the requirements under that section (for example, § 355) or, as applicable, the relevant definitional section (for example, § 368).
.02 Rev. Proc. 2026-1. Rev. Proc. 2026-1 is modified and amplified as follows:
(1) Section 6.03. The following text is added after the first paragraph of section 6.03 of Rev. Proc. 2026-1:
Significant issue rulings. In addition, the Office of Associate Chief Counsel (Corporate) may issue a letter ruling on part of an integrated transaction without ruling on the larger transaction if the requested ruling would address one or more issues that: (1) are solely under the jurisdiction of the Associate Chief Counsel (Corporate); (2) are significant; and (3) involve the tax consequences or characterization of a transaction (or part of a transaction) that is described in § 332, 351, 355, 368, or 1036. The Service also may rule on a particular legal issue under a section of the Code or related regulations without ruling on other legal issues under that section of the Code or regulations if the issue meets the three conditions of the preceding sentence.
A significant issue is a germane and specific issue of law, provided that a ruling on the issue would not be a comfort ruling or the conclusion in such a ruling otherwise would not be essentially free from doubt. An issue is germane if resolution of the issue is necessary to determine an element of the tax treatment of the transaction. An issue is specific if it is the narrowest articulation of the germane issue. A change of circumstances arising after a transaction ordinarily does not present a significant issue with respect to the transaction.
Before preparing the letter ruling request under this section 6.03, a taxpayer should follow the procedures provided in section 10.07(1) of this revenue procedure for pre-submission conferences to discuss whether the Office of the Associate Chief Counsel (Corporate) will issue a letter ruling under this section 6.03. The Service reserves the right to rule on any other aspect of the transaction (including ruling adversely) if the Service believes doing so is in the interest of sound tax administration.
All requests for a ruling under this section 6.03 must contain the following:
(1) A narrative description of the transaction that puts the significant issue in context;
(2) A statement identifying the issue;
(3) An analysis of the relevant law that sets forth the authorities most closely related to the issue, explains why these authorities do not resolve the issue, and explains why the issue is significant;
(4) Applicable information and representations from relevant revenue procedures with respect to the significant issue (see Appendix F of this revenue procedure) and as otherwise may be required by the Office of Associate Chief Counsel (Corporate) depending on the facts and circumstances;
(5) If the taxpayer is requesting a ruling on the tax treatment of part of an integrated transaction, a representation regarding the relevant tax consequences of the integrated transaction (to the best knowledge and belief of the taxpayer), assuming that the Service issues the requested ruling;
(6) The precise ruling(s) being requested; and
(7) A statement that no rulings outside the jurisdiction of the Associate Chief Counsel (Corporate) are requested.
(2) Appendix C. The following text is added after question 8 of Appendix C of Rev. Proc. 2026-1:
See section 6.03.
.03 Rev. Proc. 2026-3. The following text is added after the first paragraph of section 4.02(2) of Rev. Proc. 2026-3:
Notwithstanding the prior paragraph, in connection with transactions described in § 332, 351, 355, 368, or 1036, the Office of Associate Chief Counsel (Corporate) may issue a letter ruling on part of an integrated transaction if and to the extent that the transaction presents a significant issue. See section 6.03 of Rev. Proc. 2026-1, 2026-1 I.R.B. 1, as modified and amplified by Rev. Proc. 2026-21, 2026-22 I.R.B. 1538.
Rev. Proc. 2026-1 and Rev. Proc. 2026-3 are modified and amplified.
The significant issue ruling program established by this revenue procedure applies to all letter ruling requests described in section 4.01 of this revenue procedure postmarked or, if not mailed, received by the Service after May 5, 2026.
The collections of information in this revenue procedure have been reviewed and approved by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3507) under control number 1545-1522.
An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless the collection of information displays a valid OMB control number.
The collections of information in this revenue procedure are in section 5. This information is required to determine whether a taxpayer qualifies for a letter ruling on part of an integrated transaction without the Service ruling on the larger transaction. The collections of information are required to obtain a benefit. The likely respondents are corporations seeking letter rulings. These procedures do not change the estimated burden already approved by OMB.
Books or records relating to a collection of information must be retained as long as their contents may become material in the administration of any internal revenue tax law. Generally, tax returns and tax return information are confidential, as required by § 6103.
The principal author of this revenue procedure is Jonathan H. Blake of the Office of Associate Chief Counsel (Corporate). For further information regarding this revenue procedure, contact Mr. Blake at (202) 317-6847 (not a toll-free call).
1 Unless otherwise specified, all “section” references will be to the Internal Revenue Code, as amended, or the Income Tax Regulations.
This revenue procedure provides indexing adjustments for the applicable dollar amounts under § 4980H(c)(1) and (b)(1) of the Internal Revenue Code. These indexed amounts are used to calculate the employer shared responsibility payments (ESRP) under § 4980H(a) and (b)(1), respectively.
Under § 4980H(c)(5), in the case of any calendar year after 2014, the applicable dollar amounts of $2,000 and $3,000 under § 4980H(c)(1) and (b)(1), respectively, are increased by an amount equal to the product of such dollar amount and the premium adjustment percentage (as defined in § 1302(c)(4) of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act1) for the calendar year. If the amount of any increase is not a multiple of $10, such increase is rounded to the next lowest multiple of $10.
The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) published the premium adjustment percentage for 2027 on January 29, 2026, using the most recent National Health Expenditure Accounts (NHEA) income and premium data that was available at the time of publication. For calculation of the 2027 benefit year payment parameters, HHS used the NHEA Projections 2024-2033, the data source that reflected the most recent projections available. Using the NHEA Projections 2024-2033, the premium adjustment percentage for 2027 is the percentage (if any) by which the most recent NHEA projection of per enrollee premiums for private health insurance (excluding Medigap and property and casualty insurance) for 2026 ($8,919) exceeds the most recent NHEA estimate of per enrollee premiums for private health insurance (excluding Medigap and property and casualty insurance) for 2013 ($4,715) carried out to ten significant digits. Using this formula, the applicable premium adjustment percentage is 1.8916224814.2 For calendar year 2027, the adjusted $2,000 amount under § 4980H(c)(1) is $3,780 ($2,000 x 1.8916224814 = $3,783.2449628 rounded down to $3,780), and the adjusted $3,000 amount under § 4980H(b)(1) is $5,670 ($3,000 x 1.8916224814 = $5,674.8674442 rounded down to $5,670).
This revenue procedure is effective for taxable years and plan years beginning after December 31, 2026.
The principal author of this revenue procedure is the Office of Associate Chief Counsel (Employee Benefits, Exempt Organizations, and Employment Taxes). For further information regarding this revenue procedure, contact the Office of Associate Chief Counsel (Employee Benefits, Exempt Organizations, and Employment Taxes) at (202) 317-5500 (not a toll-free call).
1 Unless otherwise specified, all "section" references will be to the Internal Revenue Code, as amended, or the Income Tax Regulations.
1 Pub. L. 111–148, 124 Stat. 119 (2010).
2 See https://www.cms.gov/files/document/2027-papi-parameters-guidance-2026-01-29.pdf.
This revenue procedure provides issuers of qualified mortgage bonds, as defined in § 143(a) of the Internal Revenue Code1, and issuers of mortgage credit certificates, as defined in § 25(c), with (1) the nationwide average purchase price for residences located in the United States, and (2) average area purchase price safe harbors for residences located in statistical areas in each state, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, the Northern Mariana Islands, American Samoa, the Virgin Islands, and Guam.
.01 Section 103(a) provides that, except as provided in § 103(b), gross income does not include interest on any State or local bond. Section 103(b)(1) provides that § 103(a) shall not apply to any private activity bond that is not a “qualified bond” within the meaning of § 141. Section 141(e) provides, in part, that the term “qualified bond” means any private activity bond if such bond (1) is a qualified mortgage bond under § 143, (2) meets the volume cap requirements under § 146, and (3) meets the applicable requirements under § 147.
.02 Section 143(a)(1) provides that the term “qualified mortgage bond” means a bond that is issued as part of a qualified mortgage issue. Section 143(a)(2)(A) provides that the term “qualified mortgage issue” means an issue of one or more bonds by a State or political subdivision thereof, but only if: (i) all proceeds of the issue (exclusive of issuance costs and a reasonably required reserve) are to be used to finance owner-occupied residences; (ii) the issue meets the requirements of subsections (c), (d), (e), (f), (g), (h), (i), and (m)(7) of § 143; (iii) the issue does not meet the private business tests of paragraphs (1) and (2) of § 141(b); and (iv) with respect to amounts received more than 10 years after the date of issuance, repayments of $250,000 or more of principal on mortgage financing provided by the issue are used by the close of the first semiannual period beginning after the date the prepayment (or complete repayment) is received to redeem bonds that are part of the issue.
.03 Section 143(e)(1) provides that an issue of bonds meets the purchase price requirements of § 143(e) if the acquisition cost of each residence financed by the issue does not exceed 90 percent of the average area purchase price applicable to such residence. Section 143(e)(5) provides that, in the case of a targeted area residence (as defined in § 143(j)), § 143(e)(1) shall be applied by substituting 110 percent for 90 percent.
.04 Section 143(e)(2) provides that the term “average area purchase price” means, with respect to any residence, the average purchase price of single-family residences (in the statistical area in which the residence is located) that were purchased during the most recent 12-month period for which sufficient statistical information is available. Under § 143(e)(3) and (4), respectively, separate determinations of average area purchase price are to be made for new and existing residences, and for two-, three-, and four-family residences.
.05 Section 143(e)(2) also provides that the determination of the average area purchase price shall be made as of the date on which the commitment to provide the financing is made or, if earlier, the date of the purchase of the residence.
.06 Section 143(k)(2)(A) provides that the term “statistical area” means (i) a metropolitan statistical area (MSA), and (ii) any county (or the portion thereof) that is not within an MSA. Section 143(k)(2)(C) further provides that if sufficient recent statistical information with respect to a county (or portion thereof) is unavailable, the Secretary may substitute another area for which there is sufficient recent statistical information for such county (or portion thereof). In the case of any portion of a State which is not within a county, § 143(k)(2)(D) provides that the Secretary may designate an area that is the equivalent of a county. Section 6a.103A-1(b)(4)(i) (issued under § 103A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, the predecessor of § 143) provides that the term “State” includes a possession of the United States and the District of Columbia.
.07 Section 6a.103A-2(f)(5)(i) provides that an issuer may rely upon the average area purchase price safe harbors published by the Department of the Treasury (Treasury Department) for the statistical area in which a residence is located. Section 6a.103A-2(f)(5)(i) further provides that an issuer may use an average area purchase price limitation different from the published safe harbor if the issuer has more accurate and comprehensive data for the statistical area.
.08 Section 25(c) permits a State or political subdivision thereof to establish a qualified mortgage credit certificate program. In general, a qualified mortgage credit certificate program is a program under which the issuing authority elects not to issue an amount of private activity bonds that it may otherwise issue during the calendar year under § 146, and in its place, issues mortgage credit certificates to taxpayers in connection with the acquisition of their principal residences. Section 25(a)(1) provides, in general, that the holder of a mortgage credit certificate may claim a federal income tax credit equal to the product of the credit rate specified in the certificate and the interest paid or accrued during the tax year on the remaining principal of the indebtedness incurred to acquire the residence. Section 25(c)(2)(A)(iii)(III) generally provides that residences acquired in connection with the issuance of mortgage credit certificates must meet the purchase price requirements of § 143(e).
.09 Section 143(f) imposes limitations on the income of mortgagors for whom financing may be provided by qualified mortgage bonds. In addition, § 25(c)(2)(A)(iii)(IV) provides that holders of mortgage credit certificates must meet the income requirement of § 143(f). Generally, under §§ 143(f)(1) and 25(c)(2)(A)(iii)(IV), the income requirement is met only if all owner-financing under a qualified mortgage bond and all mortgage credit certificates issued under a qualified mortgage credit certificate program are provided to mortgagors whose family income is 115 percent or less of the applicable median family income. Section 143(f)(5), however, generally provides for an upward adjustment to the percentage limitation in high housing cost areas. High housing cost areas are defined in § 143(f)(5)(C) as any statistical area for which the housing cost/income ratio is greater than 1.2.
.10 Under § 143(f)(5)(D), the housing cost/income ratio with respect to any statistical area is determined by dividing (a) the applicable housing price ratio for such area by (b) the ratio that the area median gross income for such area bears to the median gross income for the United States. The applicable housing price ratio is the new housing price ratio (new housing average area purchase price divided by the new housing average purchase price for the United States) or the existing housing price ratio (existing housing average area purchase price divided by the existing housing average purchase price for the United States), whichever results in the housing cost/income ratio being closer to 1.
.11 Average area purchase price safe harbors for each state, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, the Northern Mariana Islands, American Samoa, the Virgin Islands, and Guam were last published in Rev. Proc. 2025-18, 2025-19 I.R.B. 1430.
.12 The nationwide average purchase price was last published in section 4.02 of Rev. Proc. 2025-18. Guidance with respect to the United States and area median gross income figures that are used in computing the housing cost/income ratio described in § 143(f)(5) was published in Rev. Proc. 2021-19, 2021-15 I.R.B. 1008.
.13 This revenue procedure uses Federal Housing Administration (FHA) loan limits for a given statistical area to calculate the average area purchase price safe harbor for that area. FHA sets limits on the dollar value of loans it will insure based on median home prices and conforming loan limits established by the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation. In particular, FHA sets an area’s loan limit at 95 percent of the median home sales price for the area, subject to certain floors and caps measured against conforming loan limits.
.14 To calculate the average area purchase price safe harbors in this revenue procedure, the FHA loan limits are adjusted to take into account the differences between average and median purchase prices. Because FHA loan limits do not differentiate between new and existing residences, this revenue procedure contains a single average area purchase price safe harbor for both new and existing residences in a statistical area.
.15 The average area purchase price safe harbors listed in section 4.01 of this revenue procedure are based on FHA loan limits released December 11, 2025. FHA loan limits are available for statistical areas in each state, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, the Northern Mariana Islands, American Samoa, the Virgin Islands, and Guam. See section 3.03 of this revenue procedure with respect to FHA loan limits revised after December 11, 2025.
.16 OMB Bulletin No. 23-01, dated and effective July 21, 2023, revised the definitions of the nation’s 935 metropolitan areas. The OMB bulletin no longer includes primary MSAs.
.01 Average area purchase price safe harbors for statistical areas in each state, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, the Northern Mariana Islands, American Samoa, the Virgin Islands, and Guam are set forth in section 4.01 of this revenue procedure. Average area purchase price safe harbors are provided for single-family and two to four-family residences. For each type of residence, section 4.01 of this revenue procedure contains a single safe harbor that may be used for both new and existing residences. Issuers of qualified mortgage bonds and issuers of mortgage credit certificates may rely on these safe harbors to satisfy the requirements of § 143(e) and (f). Section 4.01 of this revenue procedure provides safe harbors for MSAs and for certain counties and county equivalents. If no purchase price safe harbor is available for a statistical area, the safe harbor for “ALL OTHER AREAS” may be used for that statistical area.
.02 If a residence is in an MSA, the safe harbor applicable to it is the limitation of that MSA. If an MSA falls in more than one state, the MSA is listed in section 4.01 of this revenue procedure under each state.
.03 If the FHA revises the FHA loan limit for any statistical area after December 11, 2025, an issuer of qualified mortgage bonds or mortgage credit certificates may use the revised FHA loan limit for that statistical area to compute (as provided in the next sentence) a revised average area purchase price safe harbor for the statistical area provided that the issuer maintains records evidencing the revised FHA loan limit. The revised average area purchase price safe harbor for that statistical area is computed by dividing the revised FHA loan limit by 0.860.
.04 If, pursuant to § 6a.103A-2(f)(5)(i), an issuer uses more accurate and comprehensive data to determine the average area purchase price for a statistical area, the issuer must make separate average area purchase price determinations for new and existing residences. Moreover, when computing the average area purchase price for a statistical area that is an MSA, as defined in OMB Bulletin No. 23-01, the issuer must make the computation for the entire applicable MSA. When computing the average area purchase price for a statistical area that is not an MSA, the issuer must make the computation for the entire statistical area and may not combine statistical areas. Thus, for example, the issuer may not combine two or more counties.
.05 If an issuer receives a ruling permitting it to rely on an average area purchase price limitation that is higher than the applicable safe harbor in this revenue procedure, the issuer may rely on that higher limitation for the purpose of satisfying the requirements of § 143(e) and (f) for bonds sold, and mortgage credit certificates issued, not more than 30 months following the termination date of the 12-month period used by the issuer to compute the limitation.
.06 Section 4.02 of this revenue procedure sets forth a single nationwide average purchase price for purposes of computing the housing cost/income ratio under § 143(f)(5).
.07 Issuers must use the nationwide average purchase price set forth in section 4.02 of this revenue procedure when computing the housing cost/income ratio under § 143(f)(5) regardless of whether they are relying on the average area purchase price safe harbors contained in this revenue procedure or using more accurate and comprehensive data to determine average area purchase prices for new and existing residences for a statistical area that are different from the published safe harbors in this revenue procedure.
.08 If, pursuant to section 6.02 of this revenue procedure, an issuer relies on the average area purchase price safe harbors contained in Rev. Proc. 2025-18, the issuer must use the nationwide average purchase price set forth in section 4.02 of Rev. Proc. 2025-18 in computing the housing cost/income ratio under § 143(f)(5). Likewise, if, pursuant to section 6.04 of this revenue procedure, an issuer relies on the nationwide average purchase price published in Rev. Proc. 2025-18, the issuer must use the average area purchase price safe harbors set forth in section 4.01 of Rev. Proc. 2025-18 in computing the housing cost/income ratio under § 143(f)(5).
.01 Average area purchase prices for single-family and two to four-family residences in MSAs, and for certain counties and county equivalents are set forth below. The safe harbor for “ALL OTHER AREAS” (found at the end of the table below) may be used for a statistical area that is not listed below.
2026 Average Area Purchase Prices for Mortgage Revenue Bonds
| County Name | State | One-Unit Limit | Two-Unit Limit | Three-Unit Limit | Four-Unit Limit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ALEUTIANS WEST | AK | $680,510 | $871,171 | $1,053,055 | $1,308,704 |
| JUNEAU CITY AND | AK | $693,879 | $888,261 | $1,073,748 | $1,334,396 |
| KODIAK ISLAND B | AK | $629,705 | $806,125 | $974,407 | $1,210,990 |
| SITKA CITY AND | AK | $681,847 | $872,857 | $1,055,089 | $1,311,261 |
| COCONINO COUNTY | AZ | $708,586 | $907,094 | $1,096,477 | $1,362,705 |
| MARICOPA COUNTY | AZ | $648,423 | $830,074 | $1,003,413 | $1,246,971 |
| PINAL COUNTY | AZ | $648,423 | $830,074 | $1,003,413 | $1,246,971 |
| ALAMEDA COUNTY | CA | $1,452,194 | $1,859,383 | $2,247,478 | $2,793,217 |
| ALPINE COUNTY | CA | $855,651 | $1,095,372 | $1,324,049 | $1,645,500 |
| CONTRA COSTA CO | CA | $1,452,194 | $1,859,383 | $2,247,478 | $2,793,217 |
| EL DORADO COUNT | CA | $889,074 | $1,138,155 | $1,375,784 | $1,709,790 |
| LOS ANGELES COU | CA | $1,452,194 | $1,859,383 | $2,247,478 | $2,793,217 |
| MARIN COUNTY | CA | $1,452,194 | $1,859,383 | $2,247,478 | $2,793,217 |
| MENDOCINO COUNT | CA | $635,053 | $812,984 | $982,719 | $1,221,278 |
| MONO COUNTY | CA | $902,444 | $1,155,303 | $1,396,477 | $1,735,482 |
| MONTEREY COUNTY | CA | $1,156,465 | $1,480,473 | $1,789,600 | $2,223,994 |
| NAPA COUNTY | CA | $1,183,204 | $1,514,711 | $1,830,929 | $2,275,438 |
| NEVADA COUNTY | CA | $755,379 | $967,025 | $1,168,905 | $1,452,688 |
| ORANGE COUNTY | CA | $1,452,194 | $1,859,383 | $2,247,478 | $2,793,217 |
| PLACER COUNTY | CA | $889,074 | $1,138,155 | $1,375,784 | $1,709,790 |
| RIVERSIDE COUNT | CA | $802,172 | $1,026,897 | $1,241,333 | $1,542,670 |
| SACRAMENTO COUN | CA | $889,074 | $1,138,155 | $1,375,784 | $1,709,790 |
| SAN BENITO COUN | CA | $1,452,194 | $1,859,383 | $2,247,478 | $2,793,217 |
| SAN BERNARDINO | CA | $802,172 | $1,026,897 | $1,241,333 | $1,542,670 |
| SAN DIEGO COUNT | CA | $1,283,476 | $1,643,116 | $1,986,132 | $2,468,250 |
| SAN FRANCISCO C | CA | $1,452,194 | $1,859,383 | $2,247,478 | $2,793,217 |
| SAN JOAQUIN COU | CA | $788,803 | $1,009,807 | $1,220,639 | $1,516,978 |
| SAN LUIS OBISPO | CA | $1,163,150 | $1,489,076 | $1,799,947 | $2,236,898 |
| SAN MATEO COUNT | CA | $1,452,194 | $1,859,383 | $2,247,478 | $2,793,217 |
| SANTA BARBARA C | CA | $1,094,965 | $1,401,767 | $1,694,386 | $2,105,761 |
| SANTA CLARA COU | CA | $1,452,194 | $1,859,383 | $2,247,478 | $2,793,217 |
| SANTA CRUZ COUN | CA | $1,452,194 | $1,859,383 | $2,247,478 | $2,793,217 |
| SOLANO COUNTY | CA | $796,825 | $1,020,096 | $1,233,020 | $1,532,382 |
| SONOMA COUNTY | CA | $1,042,824 | $1,335,036 | $1,613,703 | $2,005,489 |
| STANISLAUS COUN | CA | $633,716 | $811,240 | $980,627 | $1,218,721 |
| VENTURA COUNTY | CA | $1,203,259 | $1,540,403 | $1,861,970 | $2,314,035 |
| YOLO COUNTY | CA | $889,074 | $1,138,155 | $1,375,784 | $1,709,790 |
| ADAMS COUNTY | CO | $1,002,715 | $1,283,650 | $1,551,680 | $1,928,353 |
| ARAPAHOE COUNTY | CO | $1,002,715 | $1,283,650 | $1,551,680 | $1,928,353 |
| BOULDER COUNTY | CO | $1,022,770 | $1,309,343 | $1,582,663 | $1,966,892 |
| BROOMFIELD COUN | CO | $1,002,715 | $1,283,650 | $1,551,680 | $1,928,353 |
| CHAFFEE COUNTY | CO | $828,911 | $1,061,135 | $1,282,720 | $1,594,056 |
| CLEAR CREEK COU | CO | $1,002,715 | $1,283,650 | $1,551,680 | $1,928,353 |
| DENVER COUNTY | CO | $1,002,715 | $1,283,650 | $1,551,680 | $1,928,353 |
| DOUGLAS COUNTY | CO | $1,002,715 | $1,283,650 | $1,551,680 | $1,928,353 |
| EAGLE COUNTY | CO | $1,452,194 | $1,859,383 | $2,247,478 | $2,793,217 |
| EL PASO COUNTY | CO | $629,705 | $806,125 | $974,407 | $1,210,990 |
| ELBERT COUNTY | CO | $1,002,715 | $1,283,650 | $1,551,680 | $1,928,353 |
| GARFIELD COUNTY | CO | $1,452,194 | $1,859,383 | $2,247,478 | $2,793,217 |
| GILPIN COUNTY | CO | $1,002,715 | $1,283,650 | $1,551,680 | $1,928,353 |
| GRAND COUNTY | CO | $1,026,781 | $1,314,458 | $1,588,883 | $1,974,623 |
| GUNNISON COUNTY | CO | $869,020 | $1,112,520 | $1,344,743 | $1,671,192 |
| HINSDALE COUNTY | CO | $655,107 | $838,677 | $1,013,760 | $1,259,818 |
| JEFFERSON COUNT | CO | $1,002,715 | $1,283,650 | $1,551,680 | $1,928,353 |
| LA PLATA COUNTY | CO | $869,020 | $1,112,520 | $1,344,743 | $1,671,192 |
| LAKE COUNTY | CO | $1,270,106 | $1,625,969 | $1,965,439 | $2,442,557 |
| LARIMER COUNTY | CO | $737,999 | $944,761 | $1,141,991 | $1,419,264 |
| MOFFAT COUNTY | CO | $1,266,095 | $1,620,853 | $1,959,219 | $2,434,826 |
| OURAY COUNTY | CO | $873,031 | $1,117,635 | $1,350,963 | $1,678,924 |
| PARK COUNTY | CO | $1,002,715 | $1,283,650 | $1,551,680 | $1,928,353 |
| PITKIN COUNTY | CO | $1,452,194 | $1,859,383 | $2,247,478 | $2,793,217 |
| ROUTT COUNTY | CO | $1,266,095 | $1,620,853 | $1,959,219 | $2,434,826 |
| SAN MIGUEL COUN | CO | $1,215,291 | $1,555,808 | $1,880,629 | $2,337,170 |
| SUMMIT COUNTY | CO | $1,270,106 | $1,625,969 | $1,965,439 | $2,442,557 |
| TELLER COUNTY | CO | $629,705 | $806,125 | $974,407 | $1,210,990 |
| WELD COUNTY | CO | $668,477 | $855,767 | $1,034,454 | $1,285,568 |
| GREATER BRIDGEP | CT | $1,136,411 | $1,454,838 | $1,758,559 | $2,185,455 |
| WESTERN CONNECT | CT | $1,136,411 | $1,454,838 | $1,758,559 | $2,185,455 |
| DISTRICT OF COL | DC | $1,452,194 | $1,859,383 | $2,247,478 | $2,793,217 |
| NEW CASTLE COUN | DE | $732,651 | $937,902 | $1,133,737 | $1,408,975 |
| BAKER COUNTY | FL | $675,162 | $864,312 | $1,044,800 | $1,298,415 |
| BROWARD COUNTY | FL | $775,433 | $992,717 | $1,199,945 | $1,491,227 |
| CLAY COUNTY | FL | $675,162 | $864,312 | $1,044,800 | $1,298,415 |
| COLLIER COUNTY | FL | $889,074 | $1,138,155 | $1,375,784 | $1,709,790 |
| DUVAL COUNTY | FL | $675,162 | $864,312 | $1,044,800 | $1,298,415 |
| MANATEE COUNTY | FL | $636,390 | $814,670 | $984,754 | $1,223,836 |
| MARTIN COUNTY | FL | $701,901 | $898,549 | $1,086,130 | $1,349,800 |
| MIAMI-DADE COUN | FL | $775,433 | $992,717 | $1,199,945 | $1,491,227 |
| MONROE COUNTY | FL | $1,151,117 | $1,473,672 | $1,781,288 | $2,213,705 |
| NASSAU COUNTY | FL | $675,162 | $864,312 | $1,044,800 | $1,298,415 |
| OKALOOSA COUNTY | FL | $701,901 | $898,549 | $1,086,130 | $1,349,800 |
| PALM BEACH COUN | FL | $775,433 | $992,717 | $1,199,945 | $1,491,227 |
| SARASOTA COUNTY | FL | $636,390 | $814,670 | $984,754 | $1,223,836 |
| ST. JOHNS COUNT | FL | $675,162 | $864,312 | $1,044,800 | $1,298,415 |
| ST. LUCIE COUNT | FL | $701,901 | $898,549 | $1,086,130 | $1,349,800 |
| WALTON COUNTY | FL | $701,901 | $898,549 | $1,086,130 | $1,349,800 |
| BARROW COUNTY | GA | $835,596 | $1,069,738 | $1,293,067 | $1,606,961 |
| BARTOW COUNTY | GA | $835,596 | $1,069,738 | $1,293,067 | $1,606,961 |
| BUTTS COUNTY | GA | $835,596 | $1,069,738 | $1,293,067 | $1,606,961 |
| CARROLL COUNTY | GA | $835,596 | $1,069,738 | $1,293,067 | $1,606,961 |
| CHEROKEE COUNTY | GA | $835,596 | $1,069,738 | $1,293,067 | $1,606,961 |
| CLARKE COUNTY | GA | $716,607 | $917,383 | $1,108,916 | $1,378,109 |
| CLAYTON COUNTY | GA | $835,596 | $1,069,738 | $1,293,067 | $1,606,961 |
| COBB COUNTY | GA | $835,596 | $1,069,738 | $1,293,067 | $1,606,961 |
| COWETA COUNTY | GA | $835,596 | $1,069,738 | $1,293,067 | $1,606,961 |
| DAWSON COUNTY | GA | $835,596 | $1,069,738 | $1,293,067 | $1,606,961 |
| DEKALB COUNTY | GA | $835,596 | $1,069,738 | $1,293,067 | $1,606,961 |
| DOUGLAS COUNTY | GA | $835,596 | $1,069,738 | $1,293,067 | $1,606,961 |
| FAYETTE COUNTY | GA | $835,596 | $1,069,738 | $1,293,067 | $1,606,961 |
| FORSYTH COUNTY | GA | $835,596 | $1,069,738 | $1,293,067 | $1,606,961 |
| FULTON COUNTY | GA | $835,596 | $1,069,738 | $1,293,067 | $1,606,961 |
| GREENE COUNTY | GA | $742,009 | $949,877 | $1,148,211 | $1,426,937 |
| GWINNETT COUNTY | GA | $835,596 | $1,069,738 | $1,293,067 | $1,606,961 |
| HARALSON COUNTY | GA | $835,596 | $1,069,738 | $1,293,067 | $1,606,961 |
| HEARD COUNTY | GA | $835,596 | $1,069,738 | $1,293,067 | $1,606,961 |
| HENRY COUNTY | GA | $835,596 | $1,069,738 | $1,293,067 | $1,606,961 |
| JASPER COUNTY | GA | $835,596 | $1,069,738 | $1,293,067 | $1,606,961 |
| LUMPKIN COUNTY | GA | $835,596 | $1,069,738 | $1,293,067 | $1,606,961 |
| MADISON COUNTY | GA | $716,607 | $917,383 | $1,108,916 | $1,378,109 |
| MERIWETHER COUN | GA | $835,596 | $1,069,738 | $1,293,067 | $1,606,961 |
| MORGAN COUNTY | GA | $835,596 | $1,069,738 | $1,293,067 | $1,606,961 |
| NEWTON COUNTY | GA | $835,596 | $1,069,738 | $1,293,067 | $1,606,961 |
| OCONEE COUNTY | GA | $716,607 | $917,383 | $1,108,916 | $1,378,109 |
| OGLETHORPE COUN | GA | $716,607 | $917,383 | $1,108,916 | $1,378,109 |
| PAULDING COUNTY | GA | $835,596 | $1,069,738 | $1,293,067 | $1,606,961 |
| PICKENS COUNTY | GA | $835,596 | $1,069,738 | $1,293,067 | $1,606,961 |
| PIKE COUNTY | GA | $835,596 | $1,069,738 | $1,293,067 | $1,606,961 |
| ROCKDALE COUNTY | GA | $835,596 | $1,069,738 | $1,293,067 | $1,606,961 |
| SPALDING COUNTY | GA | $835,596 | $1,069,738 | $1,293,067 | $1,606,961 |
| WALTON COUNTY | GA | $835,596 | $1,069,738 | $1,293,067 | $1,606,961 |
| GUAM | GU | $655,107 | $838,677 | $1,013,760 | $1,259,818 |
| HAWAII COUNTY | HI | $681,847 | $872,857 | $1,055,089 | $1,311,261 |
| HONOLULU COUNTY | HI | $962,607 | $1,232,323 | $1,489,599 | $1,851,216 |
| KALAWAO COUNTY | HI | $1,510,758 | $1,934,049 | $2,337,867 | $2,905,375 |
| KAUAI COUNTY | HI | $1,291,498 | $1,653,347 | $1,998,514 | $2,483,712 |
| MAUI COUNTY | HI | $1,510,758 | $1,934,049 | $2,337,867 | $2,905,375 |
| ADA COUNTY | ID | $681,847 | $872,857 | $1,055,089 | $1,311,261 |
| BLAINE COUNTY | ID | $882,390 | $1,129,610 | $1,365,437 | $1,696,943 |
| BOISE COUNTY | ID | $681,847 | $872,857 | $1,055,089 | $1,311,261 |
| CAMAS COUNTY | ID | $882,390 | $1,129,610 | $1,365,437 | $1,696,943 |
| CANYON COUNTY | ID | $681,847 | $872,857 | $1,055,089 | $1,311,261 |
| GEM COUNTY | ID | $681,847 | $872,857 | $1,055,089 | $1,311,261 |
| KOOTENAI COUNTY | ID | $665,803 | $852,337 | $1,030,268 | $1,280,395 |
| LINCOLN COUNTY | ID | $882,390 | $1,129,610 | $1,365,437 | $1,696,943 |
| OWYHEE COUNTY | ID | $681,847 | $872,857 | $1,055,089 | $1,311,261 |
| TETON COUNTY | ID | $1,452,194 | $1,859,383 | $2,247,478 | $2,793,217 |
| VALLEY COUNTY | ID | $715,270 | $915,697 | $1,106,824 | $1,375,551 |
| BARNSTABLE COUN | MA | $962,607 | $1,232,323 | $1,489,599 | $1,851,216 |
| BRISTOL COUNTY | MA | $915,813 | $1,172,392 | $1,417,171 | $1,761,233 |
| DUKES COUNTY | MA | $1,452,194 | $1,859,383 | $2,247,478 | $2,793,217 |
| ESSEX COUNTY | MA | $1,119,030 | $1,432,575 | $1,731,646 | $2,152,031 |
| MIDDLESEX COUNT | MA | $1,119,030 | $1,432,575 | $1,731,646 | $2,152,031 |
| NANTUCKET COUNT | MA | $1,452,194 | $1,859,383 | $2,247,478 | $2,793,217 |
| NORFOLK COUNTY | MA | $1,119,030 | $1,432,575 | $1,731,646 | $2,152,031 |
| PLYMOUTH COUNTY | MA | $1,119,030 | $1,432,575 | $1,731,646 | $2,152,031 |
| SUFFOLK COUNTY | MA | $1,119,030 | $1,432,575 | $1,731,646 | $2,152,031 |
| WORCESTER COUNT | MA | $633,716 | $811,240 | $980,627 | $1,218,721 |
| ANNE ARUNDEL CO | MD | $869,020 | $1,112,520 | $1,344,743 | $1,671,192 |
| BALTIMORE CITY | MD | $869,020 | $1,112,520 | $1,344,743 | $1,671,192 |
| BALTIMORE COUNT | MD | $869,020 | $1,112,520 | $1,344,743 | $1,671,192 |
| CARROLL COUNTY | MD | $869,020 | $1,112,520 | $1,344,743 | $1,671,192 |
| CECIL COUNTY | MD | $732,651 | $937,902 | $1,133,737 | $1,408,975 |
| CHARLES COUNTY | MD | $1,452,194 | $1,859,383 | $2,247,478 | $2,793,217 |
| FREDERICK COUNT | MD | $1,452,194 | $1,859,383 | $2,247,478 | $2,793,217 |
| HARFORD COUNTY | MD | $869,020 | $1,112,520 | $1,344,743 | $1,671,192 |
| HOWARD COUNTY | MD | $869,020 | $1,112,520 | $1,344,743 | $1,671,192 |
| MONTGOMERY COUN | MD | $1,452,194 | $1,859,383 | $2,247,478 | $2,793,217 |
| PRINCE GEORGE'S | MD | $1,452,194 | $1,859,383 | $2,247,478 | $2,793,217 |
| QUEEN ANNE'S CO | MD | $869,020 | $1,112,520 | $1,344,743 | $1,671,192 |
| CUMBERLAND COUN | ME | $715,270 | $915,697 | $1,106,824 | $1,375,551 |
| SAGADAHOC COUNT | ME | $715,270 | $915,697 | $1,106,824 | $1,375,551 |
| YORK COUNTY | ME | $715,270 | $915,697 | $1,106,824 | $1,375,551 |
| ANOKA COUNTY | MN | $641,738 | $821,529 | $993,066 | $1,234,125 |
| CARVER COUNTY | MN | $641,738 | $821,529 | $993,066 | $1,234,125 |
| CHISAGO COUNTY | MN | $641,738 | $821,529 | $993,066 | $1,234,125 |
| DAKOTA COUNTY | MN | $641,738 | $821,529 | $993,066 | $1,234,125 |
| HENNEPIN COUNTY | MN | $641,738 | $821,529 | $993,066 | $1,234,125 |
| ISANTI COUNTY | MN | $641,738 | $821,529 | $993,066 | $1,234,125 |
| LE SUEUR COUNTY | MN | $641,738 | $821,529 | $993,066 | $1,234,125 |
| MILLE LACS COUN | MN | $641,738 | $821,529 | $993,066 | $1,234,125 |
| RAMSEY COUNTY | MN | $641,738 | $821,529 | $993,066 | $1,234,125 |
| SCOTT COUNTY | MN | $641,738 | $821,529 | $993,066 | $1,234,125 |
| SHERBURNE COUNT | MN | $641,738 | $821,529 | $993,066 | $1,234,125 |
| WASHINGTON COUN | MN | $641,738 | $821,529 | $993,066 | $1,234,125 |
| WRIGHT COUNTY | MN | $641,738 | $821,529 | $993,066 | $1,234,125 |
| CARBON COUNTY | MT | $877,042 | $1,122,751 | $1,357,183 | $1,686,655 |
| FLATHEAD COUNTY | MT | $715,270 | $915,697 | $1,106,824 | $1,375,551 |
| GALLATIN COUNTY | MT | $835,596 | $1,069,738 | $1,293,067 | $1,606,961 |
| MINERAL COUNTY | MT | $695,216 | $890,004 | $1,075,783 | $1,336,954 |
| MISSOULA COUNTY | MT | $695,216 | $890,004 | $1,075,783 | $1,336,954 |
| PARK COUNTY | MT | $655,107 | $838,677 | $1,013,760 | $1,259,818 |
| RAVALLI COUNTY | MT | $651,097 | $833,504 | $1,007,540 | $1,252,145 |
| STILLWATER COUN | MT | $877,042 | $1,122,751 | $1,357,183 | $1,686,655 |
| YELLOWSTONE COU | MT | $877,042 | $1,122,751 | $1,357,183 | $1,686,655 |
| CAMDEN COUNTY | NC | $881,053 | $1,127,924 | $1,363,402 | $1,694,386 |
| CHATHAM COUNTY | NC | $737,999 | $944,761 | $1,141,991 | $1,419,264 |
| CURRITUCK COUNT | NC | $881,053 | $1,127,924 | $1,363,402 | $1,694,386 |
| DARE COUNTY | NC | $835,596 | $1,069,738 | $1,293,067 | $1,606,961 |
| DURHAM COUNTY | NC | $737,999 | $944,761 | $1,141,991 | $1,419,264 |
| GATES COUNTY | NC | $881,053 | $1,127,924 | $1,363,402 | $1,694,386 |
| ORANGE COUNTY | NC | $737,999 | $944,761 | $1,141,991 | $1,419,264 |
| PERQUIMANS COUN | NC | $935,868 | $1,198,085 | $1,448,212 | $1,799,773 |
| PERSON COUNTY | NC | $737,999 | $944,761 | $1,141,991 | $1,419,264 |
| DAWSON COUNTY | NE | $701,901 | $898,549 | $1,086,130 | $1,349,800 |
| GOSPER COUNTY | NE | $701,901 | $898,549 | $1,086,130 | $1,349,800 |
| CARROLL COUNTY | NH | $635,053 | $812,984 | $982,719 | $1,221,278 |
| HILLSBOROUGH CO | NH | $685,857 | $878,030 | $1,061,309 | $1,318,992 |
| ROCKINGHAM COUN | NH | $1,119,030 | $1,432,575 | $1,731,646 | $2,152,031 |
| STRAFFORD COUNT | NH | $1,119,030 | $1,432,575 | $1,731,646 | $2,152,031 |
| ATLANTIC COUNTY | NJ | $848,966 | $1,086,827 | $1,313,703 | $1,632,653 |
| BERGEN COUNTY | NJ | $1,452,194 | $1,859,383 | $2,247,478 | $2,793,217 |
| BURLINGTON COUN | NJ | $732,651 | $937,902 | $1,133,737 | $1,408,975 |
| CAMDEN COUNTY | NJ | $732,651 | $937,902 | $1,133,737 | $1,408,975 |
| CAPE MAY COUNTY | NJ | $848,966 | $1,086,827 | $1,313,703 | $1,632,653 |
| ESSEX COUNTY | NJ | $1,452,194 | $1,859,383 | $2,247,478 | $2,793,217 |
| GLOUCESTER COUN | NJ | $732,651 | $937,902 | $1,133,737 | $1,408,975 |
| HUDSON COUNTY | NJ | $1,452,194 | $1,859,383 | $2,247,478 | $2,793,217 |
| HUNTERDON COUNT | NJ | $1,452,194 | $1,859,383 | $2,247,478 | $2,793,217 |
| MIDDLESEX COUNT | NJ | $1,452,194 | $1,859,383 | $2,247,478 | $2,793,217 |
| MONMOUTH COUNTY | NJ | $1,452,194 | $1,859,383 | $2,247,478 | $2,793,217 |
| MORRIS COUNTY | NJ | $1,452,194 | $1,859,383 | $2,247,478 | $2,793,217 |
| OCEAN COUNTY | NJ | $1,452,194 | $1,859,383 | $2,247,478 | $2,793,217 |
| PASSAIC COUNTY | NJ | $1,452,194 | $1,859,383 | $2,247,478 | $2,793,217 |
| SALEM COUNTY | NJ | $732,651 | $937,902 | $1,133,737 | $1,408,975 |
| SOMERSET COUNTY | NJ | $1,452,194 | $1,859,383 | $2,247,478 | $2,793,217 |
| SUSSEX COUNTY | NJ | $1,452,194 | $1,859,383 | $2,247,478 | $2,793,217 |
| UNION COUNTY | NJ | $1,452,194 | $1,859,383 | $2,247,478 | $2,793,217 |
| LOS ALAMOS COUN | NM | $804,846 | $1,030,326 | $1,245,460 | $1,547,786 |
| SANTA FE COUNTY | NM | $661,792 | $847,222 | $1,024,107 | $1,272,664 |
| CARSON CITY | NV | $668,477 | $855,767 | $1,034,454 | $1,285,568 |
| DOUGLAS COUNTY | NV | $855,651 | $1,095,372 | $1,324,049 | $1,645,500 |
| LYON COUNTY | NV | $742,009 | $949,877 | $1,148,211 | $1,426,937 |
| STOREY COUNTY | NV | $742,009 | $949,877 | $1,148,211 | $1,426,937 |
| WASHOE COUNTY | NV | $742,009 | $949,877 | $1,148,211 | $1,426,937 |
| BRONX COUNTY | NY | $1,452,194 | $1,859,383 | $2,247,478 | $2,793,217 |
| KINGS COUNTY | NY | $1,452,194 | $1,859,383 | $2,247,478 | $2,793,217 |
| NASSAU COUNTY | NY | $1,452,194 | $1,859,383 | $2,247,478 | $2,793,217 |
| NEW YORK COUNTY | NY | $1,452,194 | $1,859,383 | $2,247,478 | $2,793,217 |
| PUTNAM COUNTY | NY | $1,452,194 | $1,859,383 | $2,247,478 | $2,793,217 |
| QUEENS COUNTY | NY | $1,452,194 | $1,859,383 | $2,247,478 | $2,793,217 |
| RICHMOND COUNTY | NY | $1,452,194 | $1,859,383 | $2,247,478 | $2,793,217 |
| ROCKLAND COUNTY | NY | $1,452,194 | $1,859,383 | $2,247,478 | $2,793,217 |
| SUFFOLK COUNTY | NY | $1,452,194 | $1,859,383 | $2,247,478 | $2,793,217 |
| WESTCHESTER COU | NY | $1,452,194 | $1,859,383 | $2,247,478 | $2,793,217 |
| DELAWARE COUNTY | OH | $687,194 | $879,716 | $1,063,402 | $1,321,550 |
| FAIRFIELD COUNT | OH | $687,194 | $879,716 | $1,063,402 | $1,321,550 |
| FRANKLIN COUNTY | OH | $687,194 | $879,716 | $1,063,402 | $1,321,550 |
| HOCKING COUNTY | OH | $687,194 | $879,716 | $1,063,402 | $1,321,550 |
| LICKING COUNTY | OH | $687,194 | $879,716 | $1,063,402 | $1,321,550 |
| MADISON COUNTY | OH | $687,194 | $879,716 | $1,063,402 | $1,321,550 |
| MORROW COUNTY | OH | $687,194 | $879,716 | $1,063,402 | $1,321,550 |
| PERRY COUNTY | OH | $687,194 | $879,716 | $1,063,402 | $1,321,550 |
| PICKAWAY COUNTY | OH | $687,194 | $879,716 | $1,063,402 | $1,321,550 |
| UNION COUNTY | OH | $687,194 | $879,716 | $1,063,402 | $1,321,550 |
| BENTON COUNTY | OR | $715,270 | $915,697 | $1,106,824 | $1,375,551 |
| CLACKAMAS COUNT | OR | $815,542 | $1,044,045 | $1,262,026 | $1,568,363 |
| CLATSOP COUNTY | OR | $655,107 | $838,677 | $1,013,760 | $1,259,818 |
| COLUMBIA COUNTY | OR | $815,542 | $1,044,045 | $1,262,026 | $1,568,363 |
| CROOK COUNTY | OR | $835,596 | $1,069,738 | $1,293,067 | $1,606,961 |
| DESCHUTES COUNT | OR | $835,596 | $1,069,738 | $1,293,067 | $1,606,961 |
| HOOD RIVER COUN | OR | $886,400 | $1,134,783 | $1,371,657 | $1,704,616 |
| JEFFERSON COUNT | OR | $835,596 | $1,069,738 | $1,293,067 | $1,606,961 |
| MULTNOMAH COUNT | OR | $815,542 | $1,044,045 | $1,262,026 | $1,568,363 |
| WASHINGTON COUN | OR | $815,542 | $1,044,045 | $1,262,026 | $1,568,363 |
| YAMHILL COUNTY | OR | $815,542 | $1,044,045 | $1,262,026 | $1,568,363 |
| BUCKS COUNTY | PA | $732,651 | $937,902 | $1,133,737 | $1,408,975 |
| CHESTER COUNTY | PA | $732,651 | $937,902 | $1,133,737 | $1,408,975 |
| DELAWARE COUNTY | PA | $732,651 | $937,902 | $1,133,737 | $1,408,975 |
| MONTGOMERY COUN | PA | $732,651 | $937,902 | $1,133,737 | $1,408,975 |
| PHILADELPHIA CO | PA | $732,651 | $937,902 | $1,133,737 | $1,408,975 |
| AGUAS BUENAS MU | PR | $802,172 | $1,026,897 | $1,241,333 | $1,542,670 |
| AIBONITO MUNICI | PR | $802,172 | $1,026,897 | $1,241,333 | $1,542,670 |
| BARCELONETA MUN | PR | $802,172 | $1,026,897 | $1,241,333 | $1,542,670 |
| BARRANQUITAS MU | PR | $802,172 | $1,026,897 | $1,241,333 | $1,542,670 |
| BAYAMON MUNICIP | PR | $802,172 | $1,026,897 | $1,241,333 | $1,542,670 |
| CAGUAS MUNICIPI | PR | $802,172 | $1,026,897 | $1,241,333 | $1,542,670 |
| CANOVANAS MUNIC | PR | $802,172 | $1,026,897 | $1,241,333 | $1,542,670 |
| CAROLINA MUNICI | PR | $802,172 | $1,026,897 | $1,241,333 | $1,542,670 |
| CATANO MUNICIPI | PR | $802,172 | $1,026,897 | $1,241,333 | $1,542,670 |
| CAYEY MUNICIPIO | PR | $802,172 | $1,026,897 | $1,241,333 | $1,542,670 |
| CEIBA MUNICIPIO | PR | $802,172 | $1,026,897 | $1,241,333 | $1,542,670 |
| CIALES MUNICIPI | PR | $802,172 | $1,026,897 | $1,241,333 | $1,542,670 |
| CIDRA MUNICIPIO | PR | $802,172 | $1,026,897 | $1,241,333 | $1,542,670 |
| COMERIO MUNICIP | PR | $802,172 | $1,026,897 | $1,241,333 | $1,542,670 |
| COROZAL MUNICIP | PR | $802,172 | $1,026,897 | $1,241,333 | $1,542,670 |
| DORADO MUNICIPI | PR | $802,172 | $1,026,897 | $1,241,333 | $1,542,670 |
| FAJARDO MUNICIP | PR | $802,172 | $1,026,897 | $1,241,333 | $1,542,670 |
| FLORIDA MUNICIP | PR | $802,172 | $1,026,897 | $1,241,333 | $1,542,670 |
| GUAYNABO MUNICI | PR | $802,172 | $1,026,897 | $1,241,333 | $1,542,670 |
| GURABO MUNICIPI | PR | $802,172 | $1,026,897 | $1,241,333 | $1,542,670 |
| HUMACAO MUNICIP | PR | $802,172 | $1,026,897 | $1,241,333 | $1,542,670 |
| JUNCOS MUNICIPI | PR | $802,172 | $1,026,897 | $1,241,333 | $1,542,670 |
| LAS PIEDRAS MUN | PR | $802,172 | $1,026,897 | $1,241,333 | $1,542,670 |
| LOIZA MUNICIPIO | PR | $802,172 | $1,026,897 | $1,241,333 | $1,542,670 |
| LUQUILLO MUNICI | PR | $802,172 | $1,026,897 | $1,241,333 | $1,542,670 |
| MANATI MUNICIPI | PR | $802,172 | $1,026,897 | $1,241,333 | $1,542,670 |
| MAUNABO MUNICIP | PR | $802,172 | $1,026,897 | $1,241,333 | $1,542,670 |
| MOROVIS MUNICIP | PR | $802,172 | $1,026,897 | $1,241,333 | $1,542,670 |
| NAGUABO MUNICIP | PR | $802,172 | $1,026,897 | $1,241,333 | $1,542,670 |
| NARANJITO MUNIC | PR | $802,172 | $1,026,897 | $1,241,333 | $1,542,670 |
| OROCOVIS MUNICI | PR | $802,172 | $1,026,897 | $1,241,333 | $1,542,670 |
| RIO GRANDE MUNI | PR | $802,172 | $1,026,897 | $1,241,333 | $1,542,670 |
| SAN JUAN MUNICI | PR | $802,172 | $1,026,897 | $1,241,333 | $1,542,670 |
| SAN LORENZO MUN | PR | $802,172 | $1,026,897 | $1,241,333 | $1,542,670 |
| TOA ALTA MUNICI | PR | $802,172 | $1,026,897 | $1,241,333 | $1,542,670 |
| TOA BAJA MUNICI | PR | $802,172 | $1,026,897 | $1,241,333 | $1,542,670 |
| TRUJILLO ALTO M | PR | $802,172 | $1,026,897 | $1,241,333 | $1,542,670 |
| VEGA ALTA MUNIC | PR | $802,172 | $1,026,897 | $1,241,333 | $1,542,670 |
| VEGA BAJA MUNIC | PR | $802,172 | $1,026,897 | $1,241,333 | $1,542,670 |
| YABUCOA MUNICIP | PR | $802,172 | $1,026,897 | $1,241,333 | $1,542,670 |
| BRISTOL COUNTY | RI | $915,813 | $1,172,392 | $1,417,171 | $1,761,233 |
| KENT COUNTY | RI | $915,813 | $1,172,392 | $1,417,171 | $1,761,233 |
| NEWPORT COUNTY | RI | $915,813 | $1,172,392 | $1,417,171 | $1,761,233 |
| PROVIDENCE COUN | RI | $915,813 | $1,172,392 | $1,417,171 | $1,761,233 |
| WASHINGTON COUN | RI | $915,813 | $1,172,392 | $1,417,171 | $1,761,233 |
| BEAUFORT COUNTY | SC | $742,009 | $949,877 | $1,148,211 | $1,426,937 |
| BERKELEY COUNTY | SC | $802,172 | $1,026,897 | $1,241,333 | $1,542,670 |
| CHARLESTON COUN | SC | $802,172 | $1,026,897 | $1,241,333 | $1,542,670 |
| DORCHESTER COUN | SC | $802,172 | $1,026,897 | $1,241,333 | $1,542,670 |
| JASPER COUNTY | SC | $742,009 | $949,877 | $1,148,211 | $1,426,937 |
| LAWRENCE COUNTY | SD | $629,705 | $806,125 | $974,407 | $1,210,990 |
| CANNON COUNTY | TN | $1,196,574 | $1,531,859 | $1,851,623 | $2,301,130 |
| CHEATHAM COUNTY | TN | $1,196,574 | $1,531,859 | $1,851,623 | $2,301,130 |
| DAVIDSON COUNTY | TN | $1,196,574 | $1,531,859 | $1,851,623 | $2,301,130 |
| DICKSON COUNTY | TN | $1,196,574 | $1,531,859 | $1,851,623 | $2,301,130 |
| HICKMAN COUNTY | TN | $1,196,574 | $1,531,859 | $1,851,623 | $2,301,130 |
| MACON COUNTY | TN | $1,196,574 | $1,531,859 | $1,851,623 | $2,301,130 |
| MAURY COUNTY | TN | $1,196,574 | $1,531,859 | $1,851,623 | $2,301,130 |
| ROBERTSON COUNT | TN | $1,196,574 | $1,531,859 | $1,851,623 | $2,301,130 |
| RUTHERFORD COUN | TN | $1,196,574 | $1,531,859 | $1,851,623 | $2,301,130 |
| SMITH COUNTY | TN | $1,196,574 | $1,531,859 | $1,851,623 | $2,301,130 |
| SUMNER COUNTY | TN | $1,196,574 | $1,531,859 | $1,851,623 | $2,301,130 |
| TROUSDALE COUNT | TN | $1,196,574 | $1,531,859 | $1,851,623 | $2,301,130 |
| WILLIAMSON COUN | TN | $1,196,574 | $1,531,859 | $1,851,623 | $2,301,130 |
| WILSON COUNTY | TN | $1,196,574 | $1,531,859 | $1,851,623 | $2,301,130 |
| ATASCOSA COUNTY | TX | $648,423 | $830,074 | $1,003,413 | $1,246,971 |
| BANDERA COUNTY | TX | $648,423 | $830,074 | $1,003,413 | $1,246,971 |
| BASTROP COUNTY | TX | $664,466 | $850,651 | $1,028,234 | $1,277,837 |
| BEXAR COUNTY | TX | $648,423 | $830,074 | $1,003,413 | $1,246,971 |
| CALDWELL COUNTY | TX | $664,466 | $850,651 | $1,028,234 | $1,277,837 |
| COLLIN COUNTY | TX | $655,107 | $838,677 | $1,013,760 | $1,259,818 |
| COMAL COUNTY | TX | $648,423 | $830,074 | $1,003,413 | $1,246,971 |
| DALLAS COUNTY | TX | $655,107 | $838,677 | $1,013,760 | $1,259,818 |
| DENTON COUNTY | TX | $655,107 | $838,677 | $1,013,760 | $1,259,818 |
| ELLIS COUNTY | TX | $655,107 | $838,677 | $1,013,760 | $1,259,818 |
| GLASSCOCK COUNT | TX | $945,226 | $1,210,060 | $1,462,686 | $1,817,792 |
| GUADALUPE COUNT | TX | $648,423 | $830,074 | $1,003,413 | $1,246,971 |
| HAYS COUNTY | TX | $664,466 | $850,651 | $1,028,234 | $1,277,837 |
| HUNT COUNTY | TX | $655,107 | $838,677 | $1,013,760 | $1,259,818 |
| JOHNSON COUNTY | TX | $655,107 | $838,677 | $1,013,760 | $1,259,818 |
| KAUFMAN COUNTY | TX | $655,107 | $838,677 | $1,013,760 | $1,259,818 |
| KENDALL COUNTY | TX | $648,423 | $830,074 | $1,003,413 | $1,246,971 |
| MEDINA COUNTY | TX | $648,423 | $830,074 | $1,003,413 | $1,246,971 |
| PARKER COUNTY | TX | $655,107 | $838,677 | $1,013,760 | $1,259,818 |
| ROCKWALL COUNTY | TX | $655,107 | $838,677 | $1,013,760 | $1,259,818 |
| TARRANT COUNTY | TX | $655,107 | $838,677 | $1,013,760 | $1,259,818 |
| TRAVIS COUNTY | TX | $664,466 | $850,651 | $1,028,234 | $1,277,837 |
| WILLIAMSON COUN | TX | $664,466 | $850,651 | $1,028,234 | $1,277,837 |
| WILSON COUNTY | TX | $648,423 | $830,074 | $1,003,413 | $1,246,971 |
| WISE COUNTY | TX | $655,107 | $838,677 | $1,013,760 | $1,259,818 |
| DAVIS COUNTY | UT | $865,009 | $1,107,347 | $1,338,582 | $1,663,519 |
| GRAND COUNTY | UT | $975,976 | $1,249,413 | $1,510,293 | $1,876,909 |
| JUAB COUNTY | UT | $699,227 | $895,120 | $1,082,003 | $1,344,685 |
| MORGAN COUNTY | UT | $865,009 | $1,107,347 | $1,338,582 | $1,663,519 |
| RICH COUNTY | UT | $673,825 | $862,626 | $1,042,708 | $1,295,857 |
| SALT LAKE COUNT | UT | $740,672 | $948,191 | $1,146,176 | $1,424,379 |
| SUMMIT COUNTY | UT | $1,352,997 | $1,732,111 | $2,093,728 | $2,602,003 |
| TOOELE COUNTY | UT | $740,672 | $948,191 | $1,146,176 | $1,424,379 |
| UTAH COUNTY | UT | $699,227 | $895,120 | $1,082,003 | $1,344,685 |
| WASATCH COUNTY | UT | $1,352,997 | $1,732,111 | $2,093,728 | $2,602,003 |
| WASHINGTON COUN | UT | $705,912 | $903,665 | $1,092,350 | $1,357,531 |
| WAYNE COUNTY | UT | $1,159,139 | $1,483,903 | $1,793,727 | $2,229,167 |
| WEBER COUNTY | UT | $865,009 | $1,107,347 | $1,338,582 | $1,663,519 |
| ALBEMARLE COUNT | VA | $695,216 | $890,004 | $1,075,783 | $1,336,954 |
| ALEXANDRIA CITY | VA | $1,452,194 | $1,859,383 | $2,247,478 | $2,793,217 |
| AMELIA COUNTY | VA | $822,227 | $1,052,590 | $1,272,373 | $1,581,210 |
| ARLINGTON COUNT | VA | $1,452,194 | $1,859,383 | $2,247,478 | $2,793,217 |
| CHARLES CITY CO | VA | $822,227 | $1,052,590 | $1,272,373 | $1,581,210 |
| CHARLOTTESVILLE | VA | $695,216 | $890,004 | $1,075,783 | $1,336,954 |
| CHESAPEAKE CITY | VA | $881,053 | $1,127,924 | $1,363,402 | $1,694,386 |
| CHESTERFIELD CO | VA | $822,227 | $1,052,590 | $1,272,373 | $1,581,210 |
| CLARKE COUNTY | VA | $1,452,194 | $1,859,383 | $2,247,478 | $2,793,217 |
| COLONIAL HEIGHT | VA | $822,227 | $1,052,590 | $1,272,373 | $1,581,210 |
| CULPEPER COUNTY | VA | $1,452,194 | $1,859,383 | $2,247,478 | $2,793,217 |
| DINWIDDIE COUNT | VA | $822,227 | $1,052,590 | $1,272,373 | $1,581,210 |
| FAIRFAX CITY | VA | $1,452,194 | $1,859,383 | $2,247,478 | $2,793,217 |
| FAIRFAX COUNTY | VA | $1,452,194 | $1,859,383 | $2,247,478 | $2,793,217 |
| FALLS CHURCH CI | VA | $1,452,194 | $1,859,383 | $2,247,478 | $2,793,217 |
| FAUQUIER COUNTY | VA | $1,452,194 | $1,859,383 | $2,247,478 | $2,793,217 |
| FLUVANNA COUNTY | VA | $695,216 | $890,004 | $1,075,783 | $1,336,954 |
| FREDERICKSBURG | VA | $1,452,194 | $1,859,383 | $2,247,478 | $2,793,217 |
| GLOUCESTER COUN | VA | $881,053 | $1,127,924 | $1,363,402 | $1,694,386 |
| GOOCHLAND COUNT | VA | $822,227 | $1,052,590 | $1,272,373 | $1,581,210 |
| GREENE COUNTY | VA | $695,216 | $890,004 | $1,075,783 | $1,336,954 |
| HAMPTON CITY | VA | $881,053 | $1,127,924 | $1,363,402 | $1,694,386 |
| HANOVER COUNTY | VA | $822,227 | $1,052,590 | $1,272,373 | $1,581,210 |
| HENRICO COUNTY | VA | $822,227 | $1,052,590 | $1,272,373 | $1,581,210 |
| HOPEWELL CITY | VA | $822,227 | $1,052,590 | $1,272,373 | $1,581,210 |
| ISLE OF WIGHT C | VA | $881,053 | $1,127,924 | $1,363,402 | $1,694,386 |
| JAMES CITY COUN | VA | $881,053 | $1,127,924 | $1,363,402 | $1,694,386 |
| KING AND QUEEN | VA | $822,227 | $1,052,590 | $1,272,373 | $1,581,210 |
| KING WILLIAM CO | VA | $822,227 | $1,052,590 | $1,272,373 | $1,581,210 |
| LOUDOUN COUNTY | VA | $1,452,194 | $1,859,383 | $2,247,478 | $2,793,217 |
| MANASSAS CITY | VA | $1,452,194 | $1,859,383 | $2,247,478 | $2,793,217 |
| MANASSAS PARK C | VA | $1,452,194 | $1,859,383 | $2,247,478 | $2,793,217 |
| MATHEWS COUNTY | VA | $881,053 | $1,127,924 | $1,363,402 | $1,694,386 |
| NELSON COUNTY | VA | $695,216 | $890,004 | $1,075,783 | $1,336,954 |
| NEW KENT COUNTY | VA | $822,227 | $1,052,590 | $1,272,373 | $1,581,210 |
| NEWPORT NEWS CI | VA | $881,053 | $1,127,924 | $1,363,402 | $1,694,386 |
| NORFOLK CITY | VA | $881,053 | $1,127,924 | $1,363,402 | $1,694,386 |
| PETERSBURG CITY | VA | $822,227 | $1,052,590 | $1,272,373 | $1,581,210 |
| POQUOSON CITY | VA | $881,053 | $1,127,924 | $1,363,402 | $1,694,386 |
| PORTSMOUTH CITY | VA | $881,053 | $1,127,924 | $1,363,402 | $1,694,386 |
| POWHATAN COUNTY | VA | $822,227 | $1,052,590 | $1,272,373 | $1,581,210 |
| PRINCE GEORGE C | VA | $822,227 | $1,052,590 | $1,272,373 | $1,581,210 |
| PRINCE WILLIAM | VA | $1,452,194 | $1,859,383 | $2,247,478 | $2,793,217 |
| RAPPAHANNOCK CO | VA | $1,452,194 | $1,859,383 | $2,247,478 | $2,793,217 |
| RICHMOND CITY | VA | $822,227 | $1,052,590 | $1,272,373 | $1,581,210 |
| SPOTSYLVANIA CO | VA | $1,452,194 | $1,859,383 | $2,247,478 | $2,793,217 |
| STAFFORD COUNTY | VA | $1,452,194 | $1,859,383 | $2,247,478 | $2,793,217 |
| SUFFOLK CITY | VA | $881,053 | $1,127,924 | $1,363,402 | $1,694,386 |
| SURRY COUNTY | VA | $881,053 | $1,127,924 | $1,363,402 | $1,694,386 |
| SUSSEX COUNTY | VA | $822,227 | $1,052,590 | $1,272,373 | $1,581,210 |
| VIRGINIA BEACH | VA | $881,053 | $1,127,924 | $1,363,402 | $1,694,386 |
| WARREN COUNTY | VA | $1,452,194 | $1,859,383 | $2,247,478 | $2,793,217 |
| WILLIAMSBURG CI | VA | $881,053 | $1,127,924 | $1,363,402 | $1,694,386 |
| YORK COUNTY | VA | $881,053 | $1,127,924 | $1,363,402 | $1,694,386 |
| ST. JOHN ISLAND | VI | $1,303,530 | $1,668,751 | $2,017,173 | $2,506,847 |
| ST. THOMAS ISLA | VI | $787,466 | $1,008,121 | $1,218,546 | $1,514,362 |
| CHITTENDEN COUN | VT | $668,477 | $855,767 | $1,034,454 | $1,285,568 |
| FRANKLIN COUNTY | VT | $668,477 | $855,767 | $1,034,454 | $1,285,568 |
| GRAND ISLE COUN | VT | $668,477 | $855,767 | $1,034,454 | $1,285,568 |
| CHELAN COUNTY | WA | $681,847 | $872,857 | $1,055,089 | $1,311,261 |
| CLARK COUNTY | WA | $815,542 | $1,044,045 | $1,262,026 | $1,568,363 |
| DOUGLAS COUNTY | WA | $681,847 | $872,857 | $1,055,089 | $1,311,261 |
| ISLAND COUNTY | WA | $780,781 | $999,518 | $1,208,199 | $1,501,516 |
| KING COUNTY | WA | $1,236,682 | $1,583,186 | $1,913,704 | $2,378,267 |
| KITSAP COUNTY | WA | $716,607 | $917,383 | $1,108,916 | $1,378,109 |
| PIERCE COUNTY | WA | $1,236,682 | $1,583,186 | $1,913,704 | $2,378,267 |
| SAN JUAN COUNTY | WA | $791,477 | $1,013,237 | $1,224,766 | $1,522,093 |
| SKAGIT COUNTY | WA | $721,955 | $924,242 | $1,117,170 | $1,388,398 |
| SKAMANIA COUNTY | WA | $815,542 | $1,044,045 | $1,262,026 | $1,568,363 |
| SNOHOMISH COUNT | WA | $1,236,682 | $1,583,186 | $1,913,704 | $2,378,267 |
| THURSTON COUNTY | WA | $681,847 | $872,857 | $1,055,089 | $1,311,261 |
| WHATCOM COUNTY | WA | $772,759 | $989,288 | $1,195,818 | $1,486,112 |
| WHITMAN COUNTY | WA | $673,825 | $862,626 | $1,042,708 | $1,295,857 |
| PIERCE COUNTY | WI | $641,738 | $821,529 | $993,066 | $1,234,125 |
| ST. CROIX COUNT | WI | $641,738 | $821,529 | $993,066 | $1,234,125 |
| JEFFERSON COUNT | WV | $1,452,194 | $1,859,383 | $2,247,478 | $2,793,217 |
| TETON COUNTY | WY | $1,452,194 | $1,859,383 | $2,247,478 | $2,793,217 |
| UINTA COUNTY | WY | $673,825 | $862,626 | $1,042,708 | $1,295,857 |
| All other areas – 2,794 counties (floor): | $629,283 | $805,718 | $973,884 | $1,210,379 |
.02 The nationwide average purchase price (for use in the housing cost/income ratio for new and existing residences) is $553,900.
Rev. Proc. 2025-18 is obsolete except as provided in section 6 of this revenue procedure.
.01 Issuers may rely on this revenue procedure to determine average area purchase price safe harbors for commitments to provide financing or issue mortgage credit certificates that are made, or (if the purchase precedes the commitment) for residences that are purchased, in the period that begins on May 6, 2026, and ends on the date as of which the safe harbors contained in section 4.01 of this revenue procedure are rendered obsolete by a new revenue procedure.
.02 Notwithstanding section 5 of this revenue procedure, issuers may continue to rely on the average area purchase price safe harbors contained in Rev. Proc. 2025-18, with respect to bonds sold, or for mortgage credit certificates issued with respect to bond authority exchanged, before June 5, 2026, if the commitments to provide financing or issue mortgage credit certificates are made on or before July 6, 2026.
.03 Except as provided in section 6.04, issuers must use the nationwide average purchase price limitation contained in this revenue procedure for commitments to provide financing or issue mortgage credit certificates that are made, or (if the purchase precedes the commitment) for residences that are purchased, in the period that begins on May 6, 2026 and ends on the date when the nationwide average purchase price limitation is rendered obsolete by a new revenue procedure.
.04 Notwithstanding sections 5 and 6.03 of this revenue procedure, issuers may continue to rely on the nationwide average purchase price set forth in Rev. Proc. 2025-18 with respect to bonds sold, or for mortgage credit certificates issued with respect to bond authority exchanged, before June 5, 2026, if the commitments to provide financing or issue mortgage credit certificates are made on or before July 6, 2026.
The collection of information contained in this revenue procedure has been reviewed and approved by the Office of Management and Budget in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3507) under control number 1545-1877.
An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless the collection of information displays a valid OMB control number.
This revenue procedure contains a collection of information requirement in section 3.03. The purpose of the collection of information is to verify the applicable FHA loan limit that issuers of qualified mortgage bonds and qualified mortgage certificates have used to calculate the average area purchase price for a given MSA for purposes of §§ 143(e) and 25(c). The collection of information is required to obtain the benefit of using revisions to FHA loan limits to determine average area purchase prices. The likely respondents are state and local governments.
The estimated total annual reporting and/or recordkeeping burden is: 15 hours.
The estimated annual burden per respondent and/or recordkeeper: 15 minutes.
The estimated number of respondents and/or recordkeepers: 60.
Books or records relating to a collection of information must be retained as long as their contents may become material in the administration of any internal revenue law. Generally, tax returns and tax return information are confidential, as required by 26 U.S.C. 6103.
The principal author of this revenue procedure is Brian Choi of the Office of Associate Chief Counsel (Financial Institutions & Products). For further information regarding this revenue procedure contact Mr. Choi on (202) 317-3154 (not a toll-free number).
1 Unless otherwise specified, all "section" or "§" references are to sections of the Internal Revenue Code or the Temporary Regulations under Title II of the Omnibus Reconciliation Act of 1980 (26 CFR part 6a).
Revenue rulings and revenue procedures (hereinafter referred to as “rulings”) that have an effect on previous rulings use the following defined terms to describe the effect:
Amplified describes a situation where no change is being made in a prior published position, but the prior position is being extended to apply to a variation of the fact situation set forth therein. Thus, if an earlier ruling held that a principle applied to A, and the new ruling holds that the same principle also applies to B, the earlier ruling is amplified. (Compare with modified, below).
Clarified is used in those instances where the language in a prior ruling is being made clear because the language has caused, or may cause, some confusion. It is not used where a position in a prior ruling is being changed.
Distinguished describes a situation where a ruling mentions a previously published ruling and points out an essential difference between them.
Modified is used where the substance of a previously published position is being changed. Thus, if a prior ruling held that a principle applied to A but not to B, and the new ruling holds that it applies to both A and B, the prior ruling is modified because it corrects a published position. (Compare with amplified and clarified, above).
Obsoleted describes a previously published ruling that is not considered determinative with respect to future transactions. This term is most commonly used in a ruling that lists previously published rulings that are obsoleted because of changes in laws or regulations. A ruling may also be obsoleted because the substance has been included in regulations subsequently adopted.
Revoked describes situations where the position in the previously published ruling is not correct and the correct position is being stated in a new ruling.
Superseded describes a situation where the new ruling does nothing more than restate the substance and situation of a previously published ruling (or rulings). Thus, the term is used to republish under the 1986 Code and regulations the same position published under the 1939 Code and regulations. The term is also used when it is desired to republish in a single ruling a series of situations, names, etc., that were previously published over a period of time in separate rulings. If the new ruling does more than restate the substance of a prior ruling, a combination of terms is used. For example, modified and superseded describes a situation where the substance of a previously published ruling is being changed in part and is continued without change in part and it is desired to restate the valid portion of the previously published ruling in a new ruling that is self contained. In this case, the previously published ruling is first modified and then, as modified, is superseded.
Supplemented is used in situations in which a list, such as a list of the names of countries, is published in a ruling and that list is expanded by adding further names in subsequent rulings. After the original ruling has been supplemented several times, a new ruling may be published that includes the list in the original ruling and the additions, and supersedes all prior rulings in the series.
Suspended is used in rare situations to show that the previous published rulings will not be applied pending some future action such as the issuance of new or amended regulations, the outcome of cases in litigation, or the outcome of a Service study.
The following abbreviations in current use and formerly used will appear in material published in the Bulletin.
A—Individual.
Acq.—Acquiescence.
B—Individual.
BE—Beneficiary.
BK—Bank.
B.T.A.—Board of Tax Appeals.
C—Individual.
C.B.—Cumulative Bulletin.
CFR—Code of Federal Regulations.
CI—City.
COOP—Cooperative.
Ct.D.—Court Decision.
CY—County.
D—Decedent.
DC—Dummy Corporation.
DE—Donee.
Del. Order—Delegation Order.
DISC—Domestic International Sales Corporation.
DR—Donor.
E—Estate.
EE—Employee.
E.O.—Executive Order.
ER—Employer.
ERISA—Employee Retirement Income Security Act.
EX—Executor.
F—Fiduciary.
FC—Foreign Country.
FICA—Federal Insurance Contributions Act.
FISC—Foreign International Sales Company.
FPH—Foreign Personal Holding Company.
F.R.—Federal Register.
FUTA—Federal Unemployment Tax Act.
FX—Foreign corporation.
G.C.M.—Chief Counsel’s Memorandum.
GE—Grantee.
GP—General Partner.
GR—Grantor.
IC—Insurance Company.
I.R.B.—Internal Revenue Bulletin.
LE—Lessee.
LP—Limited Partner.
LR—Lessor.
M—Minor.
Nonacq.—Nonacquiescence.
O—Organization.
P—Parent Corporation.
PHC—Personal Holding Company.
PO—Possession of the U.S.
PR—Partner.
PRS—Partnership.
PTE—Prohibited Transaction Exemption.
Pub. L.—Public Law.
REIT—Real Estate Investment Trust.
Rev. Proc.—Revenue Procedure.
Rev. Rul.—Revenue Ruling.
S—Subsidiary.
S.P.R.—Statement of Procedural Rules.
Stat.—Statutes at Large.
T—Target Corporation.
T.C.—Tax Court.
T.D.—Treasury Decision.
TFE—Transferee.
TFR—Transferor.
T.I.R.—Technical Information Release.
TP—Taxpayer.
TR—Trust.
TT—Trustee.
U.S.C.—United States Code.
X—Corporation.
Y—Corporation.
Z—Corporation.
Bulletin 2026–22
Announcements:
| Article | Issue | Link | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-1 | 2026-04 I.R.B. | 2026-04 | 402 |
| 2026-2 | 2026-05 I.R.B. | 2026-05 | 447 |
| 2026-3 | 2026-06 I.R.B. | 2026-06 | 518 |
| 2026-4 | 2026-06 I.R.B. | 2026-06 | 533 |
| 2026-5 | 2026-07 I.R.B. | 2026-07 | 540 |
| 2026-6 | 2026-10 I.R.B. | 2026-10 | 634 |
| 2026-7 | 2026-11 I.R.B. | 2026-11 | 697 |
| 2026-8 | 2026-16 I.R.B. | 2026-16 | 813 |
| 2026-9 | 2026-18 I.R.B. | 2026-18 | 881 |
Notices:
| Article | Issue | Link | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-2 | 2026-02 I.R.B. | 2026-02 | 304 |
| 2026-3 | 2026-02 I.R.B. | 2026-02 | 307 |
| 2026-5 | 2026-02 I.R.B. | 2026-02 | 309 |
| 2026-6 | 2026-02 I.R.B. | 2026-02 | 313 |
| 2026-1 | 2026-04 I.R.B. | 2026-04 | 365 |
| 2026-8 | 2026-04 I.R.B. | 2026-04 | 368 |
| 2026-10 | 2026-04 I.R.B. | 2026-04 | 378 |
| 2026-11 | 2026-06 I.R.B. | 2026-06 | 491 |
| 2026-12 | 2026-06 I.R.B. | 2026-06 | 496 |
| 2026-13 | 2026-06 I.R.B. | 2026-06 | 499 |
| 2026-9 | 2026-07 I.R.B. | 2026-07 | 534 |
| 2026-7 | 2026-11 I.R.B. | 2026-11 | 637 |
| 2026-14 | 2026-11 I.R.B. | 2026-11 | 654 |
| 2026-15 | 2026-11 I.R.B. | 2026-11 | 658 |
| 2026-16 | 2026-11 I.R.B. | 2026-11 | 685 |
| 2026-17 | 2026-12 I.R.B. | 2026-12 | 698 |
| 2026-4 | 2026-13 I.R.B. | 2026-13 | 726 |
| 2026-19 | 2026-15 I.R.B. | 2026-15 | 797 |
| 2026-20 | 2026-15 I.R.B. | 2026-15 | 800 |
| 2026-22 | 2026-15 I.R.B. | 2026-15 | 802 |
| 2026-23 | 2026-15 I.R.B. | 2026-15 | 804 |
| 2026-24 | 2026-17 I.R.B. | 2026-17 | 835 |
| 2026-25 | 2026-17 I.R.B. | 2026-17 | 836 |
| 2026-26 | 2026-18 I.R.B. | 2026-18 | 878 |
| 2026-27 | 2026-21 I.R.B. | 2026-21 | 1502 |
| 2026-29 | 2026-22 I.R.B. | 2026-22 | 1537 |
| 2026-30 | 2026-22 I.R.B. | 2026-22 | 1538 |
Proposed Regulations:
| Article | Issue | Link | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| REG-101952-24 | 2026-03 I.R.B. | 2026-03 | 345 |
| REG-110519-25 | 2026-03 I.R.B. | 2026-03 | 353 |
| REG-132251-11; REG-134219-08 | 2026-03 I.R.B. | 2026-03 | 358 |
| REG-103430-24 | 2026-05 I.R.B. | 2026-05 | 447 |
| REG-112829-25 | 2026-05 I.R.B. | 2026-05 | 452 |
| REG-113515-25 | 2026-05 I.R.B. | 2026-05 | 455 |
| REG-121244-23 | 2026-09 I.R.B. | 2026-09 | 579 |
| REG-105064-25 | 2026-13 I.R.B. | 2026-13 | 735 |
| REG-108921-25 | 2026-13 I.R.B. | 2026-13 | 756 |
| REG-117002-25 | 2026-13 I.R.B. | 2026-13 | 761 |
| REG-117270-25 | 2026-13 I.R.B. | 2026-13 | 772 |
Revenue Procedures:
| Article | Issue | Link | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-1 | 2026-01 I.R.B. | 2026-01 | 1 |
| 2026-2 | 2026-01 I.R.B. | 2026-01 | 119 |
| 2026-3 | 2026-01 I.R.B. | 2026-01 | 143 |
| 2026-4 | 2026-01 I.R.B. | 2026-01 | 160 |
| 2026-5 | 2026-01 I.R.B. | 2026-01 | 258 |
| 2026-6 | 2026-02 I.R.B. | 2026-02 | 314 |
| 2026-7 | 2026-02 I.R.B. | 2026-02 | 316 |
| 2026-8 | 2026-04 I.R.B. | 2026-04 | 380 |
| 2026-9 | 2026-04 I.R.B. | 2026-04 | 393 |
| 2026-10 | 2026-04 I.R.B. | 2026-04 | 394 |
| 2026-12 | 2026-07 I.R.B. | 2026-07 | 535 |
| 2026-13 | 2026-09 I.R.B. | 2026-09 | 563 |
| 2026-11 | 2026-12 I.R.B. | 2026-12 | 707 |
| 2026-15 | 2026-13 I.R.B. | 2026-13 | 729 |
| 2026-16 | 2026-13 I.R.B. | 2026-13 | 733 |
| 2026-17 | 2026-15 I.R.B. | 2026-15 | 805 |
| 2026-19 | 2026-19 I.R.B. | 2026-19 | 899 |
| 2026-14 | 2026-20 I.R.B. | 2026-20 | 910 |
| 2026-21 | 2026-22 I.R.B. | 2026-22 | 1538 |
| 2026-22 | 2026-22 I.R.B. | 2026-22 | 1541 |
| 2026-23 | 2026-22 I.R.B. | 2026-22 | 1542 |
Revenue Rulings:
| Article | Issue | Link | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-1 | 2026-02 I.R.B. | 2026-02 | 299 |
| 2026-2 | 2026-03 I.R.B. | 2026-03 | 342 |
| 2026-3 | 2026-06 I.R.B. | 2026-06 | 485 |
| 2026-4 | 2026-06 I.R.B. | 2026-06 | 487 |
| 2026-5 | 2026-08 I.R.B. | 2026-08 | 542 |
| 2026-6 | 2026-11 I.R.B. | 2026-11 | 635 |
| 2026-7 | 2026-15 I.R.B. | 2026-15 | 791 |
| 2026-8 | 2026-16 I.R.B. | 2026-16 | 812 |
| 2026-9 | 2026-19 I.R.B. | 2026-19 | 897 |
| 2026-10 | 2026-22 I.R.B. | 2026-22 | 1515 |
Treasury Decisions:
| Article | Issue | Link | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10042 | 2026-03 I.R.B. | 2026-03 | 320 |
| 10041 | 2026-04 I.R.B. | 2026-04 | 360 |
| 10039 | 2026-05 I.R.B. | 2026-05 | 403 |
| 10040 | 2026-05 I.R.B. | 2026-05 | 416 |
| 10043 | 2026-15 I.R.B. | 2026-15 | 793 |
| 10044 | 2026-18 I.R.B. | 2026-18 | 840 |
| 10045 | 2026-21 I.R.B. | 2026-21 | 1491 |
| 10047 | 2026-21 I.R.B. | 2026-21 | 1494 |
| 10046 | 2026-22 I.R.B. | 2026-22 | 1512 |
1 A cumulative list of all revenue rulings, revenue procedures, Treasury decisions, etc., published in Internal Revenue Bulletins 2025–27 through 2025–52 is in Internal Revenue Bulletin 2024–52, dated December 22, 2024.
The Introduction at the beginning of this issue describes the purpose and content of this publication. The weekly Internal Revenue Bulletins are available at www.irs.gov/irb/.
If you have comments concerning the format or production of the Internal Revenue Bulletin or suggestions for improving it, we would be pleased to hear from you. You can email us your suggestions or comments through the IRS Internet Home Page www.irs.gov) or write to the
Internal Revenue Service, Publishing Division, IRB Publishing Program Desk, 1111 Constitution Ave. NW, IR-6230 Washington, DC 20224.