13.1.18 Resolving TAS Cases 13.1.18.1 Program Scope and Objectives 13.1.18.1.1 Authority 13.1.18.1.2 Responsibilities 13.1.18.1.3 Program Reports 13.1.18.1.4 Terms 13.1.18.1.5 Acronyms 13.1.18.1.6 Related Resources 13.1.18.2 Principles of Resolving TAS Cases Using Common Sense and Good Judgement 13.1.18.3 Essential Components of Working a TAS Case 13.1.18.3.1 Disclosure Issues and Taxpayer Authentication 13.1.18.3.2 Case Acceptance Determination 13.1.18.3.3 Relief/Documentation Determination 13.1.18.3.4 OAR Expedite Determination 13.1.18.3.5 7811 Significant Hardship Determination 13.1.18.4 Time Frames for Taking Case Actions 13.1.18.5 Initial Actions 13.1.18.5.1 Develop an Action Plan 13.1.18.6 Initial Contact Completed by Case Advocates 13.1.18.7 Assisting Taxpayers with Economic Burdens (Criteria 1-4 Cases) 13.1.18.8 Subsequent Actions and Case Resolution 13.1.18.8.1 Reviewing and Requesting Information from Taxpayers 13.1.18.8.2 Taking Actions to Resolve Case Issues 13.1.18.8.3 Taxpayers Delivering Returns to TAS and TAS Date Stamp 13.1.18.8.4 TAS IDRS Marker Considerations 13.1.18.9 Making an IRC 7811 Significant Hardship Determination 13.1.18.9.1 When to Make an IRC 7811 Significant Hardship Determination 13.1.18.9.2 Documenting an IRC 7811 Significant Hardship Determination on TAMIS 13.1.18.9.3 Changing an IRC 7811 Significant Hardship Determination Exhibit 13.1.18-1 Terms Exhibit 13.1.18-2 Acronyms Exhibit 13.1.18-3 Related IRM Resources Part 13. Taxpayer Advocate Service Chapter 1. Taxpayer Advocate Case Procedures Section 18. Resolving TAS Cases 13.1.18 Resolving TAS Cases Manual Transmittal August 25, 2021 Purpose (1) This transmits revised IRM 13.1.18, Taxpayer Advocate Service, Taxpayer Advocate Case Procedures, Resolving TAS Cases. Material Changes (1) IRM 13.1.18, Section Title renamed Resolving TAS Cases. (2) IRM 13.1.18.1, added new Program Scope and Objectives section to include Background, Terms/Definitions/Acronyms, and Responsibilities. (3) IRM 13.1.18.2, added new section, Principles of Resolving TAS Cases Using Common Sense and Good Judgment. (4) IRM 13.1.18.3.1, added new section, Disclosure Issues and Taxpayer Authentication, to replace IRM 13.1.10.3, Disclosure Issues and Taxpayer Authentication. (5) IRM 13.1.18.5.1, added examples of a generic action plan and well-developed action plan. (6) IRM 13.1.18.5(7)(d), Initial Actions. IPU 20U0677. Added link to IRM 13.1.18.23.8, Direct Taxpayer Contact When Valid POA on File. (7) IRM 13.1.18.6(1), Initial Contact Completed by Case Advocates. Added reference and link to IRM 13.1.16.4.5, Assisting Taxpayers Speaking a Language Other Than English. (8) IRM 13.1.18.6(21), Initial Contact Completed by Case Advocates. IPU 20U0923. Added paragraphs and guidance to clarify procedures relating to the Taxpayer Bill of Rights (TBOR) for TAS employees when making initial contacts. (9) IRM 13.1.18.6(21)(3), Initial Contact Completed by Case Advocates. IPU 21U0049. Added language and "Exception" to further clarify how employees will discuss and document applicable rights of TBOR with taxpayers during initial contacts. (10) IRM 13.1.18.6(21)(4) Initial Contact Completed by Case Advocates. IPU 21U0049. Added language to clarify that written communications will also include references to specific applicable rights. (11) IRM 13.1.18.8, Subsequent Actions and Case Resolution. IPU 20U0923. Added introductory paragraph with a link to IRM 13.1.18.6(21) to remind TAS employees of updated guidance to discuss TBOR with taxpayers during subsequent contacts. Deleted 13.1.18.8(10) which contained vague TBOR language. (12) IRM 13.1.18.8(1), Subsequent Actions and Case Resolution. IPU 21U0049. Added language to clarify how employees should discuss any new applicable rights of TBOR with taxpayers and confirmed discussions of any new rights are also required to be documented in detail in TAMIS. (13) IRM 13.1.18.8.1(1) and (2), added reference and link to IRM 13.1.11.2.1, Document Attachments and clarified documents must be uploaded to TAMIS. (14) IRM 13.1.18.8.3, Power of Attorney, Third Party Authorizations, and Third Party (Check Box) Designations. Removed, content is now found in IRM 13.1.23, Taxpayer Representation. (15) IRM 13.1.18.8.4, Notice of Third Party Contacts. Removed, content is now found in IRM 13.1.2.5.2, Notification of a Third Party Contact. (16) IRM 13.1.18.8.5(9), Added language of what actions to take when document(s) size is not feasible to upload to TAMIS (i.e., 100+ pages) or exceed file size limitations for emailing. Also added link to IRM 13.1.11.2.1. (17) IRM 13.1.18.8.6, Created new subsection, TAS IDRS Marker Considerations. (18) Content in the IRM was rearranged to provide a better workflow when working a TAS case. (19) Minor formatting and grammatical changes made throughout the section, including updates per IRM Style Guide (June 2020). Effect on Other Documents IRM 13.1.18 dated May 5, 2016, is superseded. The following IRM Procedural Updates (IPU), issued from September 10, 2019, through January 6, 2021, have been incorporated into this IRM: 19U1028, 20U0677, 20U0923, and 21U0049. Audience Taxpayer Advocate Service employees Effective Date (08-25-2021) Bonnie Fuentes Executive Director Case Advocacy, Intake and Technical Support 13.1.18.1 (08-25-2021) Program Scope and Objectives Purpose: This section describes the actions taken or considered by Taxpayer Advocate Service (TAS) employees as they work on building and resolving a case. This section also encourages employees to consider the best interests of the taxpayer as they work a case to completion. Audience: These procedures apply to all Case Advocacy employees working taxpayer cases. Policy Owner: The Executive Director Case Advocacy, Intake & Technical Support (EDCA-ITS), who reports to the Deputy National Taxpayer Advocate (DNTA). Program Owner: The Director, Technical Analysis and Guidance, who reports to EDCA-ITS. 13.1.18.1.1 (08-25-2021) Authority Pursuant to IRC 7803(c) the Office of the Taxpayer Advocate (known as TAS) shall assist taxpayers to resolve problems with the IRS. 13.1.18.1.2 (08-25-2021) Responsibilities TAS employees working individual taxpayer issues are responsible for taking the appropriate actions to move a taxpayer’s issue to resolution, while taking the taxpayer’s best interests into consideration, based on the procedures in this IRM section. Case Advocacy managers are responsible for ensuring employees within their purview are following the procedures within this IRM. 13.1.18.1.3 (08-25-2021) Program Reports Reports to monitor the quality of TAS cases are derived from Taxpayer Advocate Management Information System (TAMIS) and the TAS Case Quality Review System (CQRS). The CQRS generates monthly, quarterly and fiscal year cumulative reports as well as specific queries for data analysis. TAS conducts managerial reviews, as described in IRM 1.4.13.9.6.5, Case Advocacy Employee Reviews, and the Taxpayer Advocate Service Program Letter. Many of these reviews are designed to ensure TAS employees are taking actions with advocacy efforts to facilitate case resolution. 13.1.18.1.4 (08-25-2021) Terms See Exhibit 13.1.18-1, Terms, for a list of terms and their definitions used throughout this IRM. 13.1.18.1.5 (08-25-2021) Acronyms See Exhibit 13.1.18-2, Acronyms, for a list of acronyms and their definitions used throughout this IRM and in TAMIS histories when resolving TAS cases. 13.1.18.1.6 (08-25-2021) Related Resources TAS employees will use the following resources in conjunction with this IRM when working a case to completion: Estimated Completion Date (ECD) Tool; TAS Letter 2903L, Interim Letter; Campus Requirements and Routing Guide (CRRG); TAS Letter 1671L, Second Request for Information; Pub 4019, Third Party Authorization, Levels of Authority; TAS Letter 3164-J, (Taxpayer Advocate) Third Party Contact Letter; Service Level Agreements; Case Assistance by Issue Code (CABIC); and Campus Program Locator Guide (CPLG). See Exhibit 13.1.18-3, Related IRM Resources, for a list of relevant IRMs TAS Case Advocacy employees will use when working a case. 13.1.18.2 (08-25-2021) Principles of Resolving TAS Cases Using Common Sense and Good Judgement TAS case resolution presents a challenge, because our case levels are affected not only by fluctuations in IRS activities and systemic issues, but also by external factors, including new legislation, natural disasters, and the general environment. For Intake and Case Advocates, the pressure of new and continuing cases can be daunting. For many taxpayers, the TAS employee is the one person in the IRS who has the time to listen to them and fully address their tax problems. Therefore, we do not want our case procedures to be so cumbersome that TAS employees feel like they are just checking items off a list and are no longer advocating for the taxpayer. On the other hand, TAS employees must adhere to certain procedures that are designed to properly implement the congressional mandates and direction found in IRC 7803, and IRC 7811, including the identification of systemic problems and their solutions. TAS has a responsibility to ensure that our procedures help, not impede us from fulfilling our mission, without imposing unnecessary burden on TAS employees. TAS employees, in return, must try to understand why a given procedure is necessary to TAS’s mission, and suggest procedures that might better achieve that goal and when appropriate, suggest procedures using the established process (e.g., Systemic Advocacy Management System (SAMS)) that might better achieve that goal. There are generally three phases to resolving a TAS case: Phase 1: TAS clarifies the taxpayer’s issue and what type of relief/assistance is requested or needed and makes a case acceptance determination. TAS case acceptance criteria fall into four categories to enable TAS and IRS employees to better identify the nature of the taxpayer’s problem. This approach helps ensure that the appropriate relief is provided to the taxpayer at the appropriate time. While all TAS cases are considered a priority, some cases may have issues which require TAS’s immediate attention and need actions to be taken sooner than customary. TAS’s policy is that Criteria 1-4 Cases – those involving an economic burden to taxpayers -- will be worked sooner than other TAS cases. For a definition of case acceptance criteria, see IRM 13.1.7, Taxpayer Advocate Service (TAS) Case Criteria. Phase 2: TAS builds the case by conducting research such as reviewing Integrated Data Retrieval System (IDRS), gathering information from taxpayers, third parties, or the IRS employee assigned to the case (if any), and reviewing procedural guidance and applicable regulations or laws. TAS then makes an Advocacy Determination on the best course of action for resolution and communicates this with the taxpayer before taking action. Phase 3: TAS takes any actions necessary to provide relief/assistance and to bring the case to resolution, including educating the taxpayer/representative. It is important not to confuse the concept of “hardship” and the concept of “significant hardship.” To issue a Taxpayer Assistance Order (TAO), the Internal Revenue Code (IRC) requires that the taxpayer be suffering or about to suffer a significant hardship. Under IRC 7803(c)(2)(C)(ii), the National Taxpayer Advocate has developed case criteria for referring taxpayers to TAS. Those criteria are Criteria 1-9 and are explained in greater detail in IRM 13.1.7; but all TAS cases involve some form of hardship. To issue a Taxpayer Assistance Order (TAO), IRC 7811 requires that the taxpayer be suffering or about to suffer a significant hardship. TAS’s ability to assist taxpayers is rather broad; however, circumstances that allow TAS to issue a TAO are determined under IRC 7811, and hold certain limitations. A case should be accepted into TAS based on the case acceptance criteria. While a “significant hardship” under IRC 7811, isn’t required for TAS to accept a case, TAS Case Criteria and IRC 7811 are closely aligned. The decision of whether a TAO can be issued because of a significant hardship within the meaning of IRC 7811, is a separate decision from whether the taxpayer is suffering a hardship that qualifies for TAS assistance under Criteria 1 through 4. TAS’s ability to issue a TAO because of a significant hardship is an option in certain circumstances for resolving a case, but significant hardship is not the basis for accepting a case into TAS. You will see places in IRM 13 that refer to hardship. Again, do not confuse “hardship” with “significant hardship.” Such references to hardship generally should be viewed in the context of Criteria 1 through 4 as references to economic burden. To accept a case into TAS under Criteria 1 through 4, the taxpayer must allege that the hardship presents an economic burden. The nature of the economic burden will dictate under which specific criteria (1, 2, 3, or 4) TAS should accept the case. Using the right terms is important in working TAS cases. For example, we changed the term formerly used in our case criteria to designate Criteria 1 through 4 from “economic hardship” to “economic burden.” We did this because TAS and IRS employees alike, were confusing the idea of what it takes to get into TAS as a case with what it takes to get relief from a levy under IRC 6343(a)(1)(D), (where the term “economic hardship” is used in the Code to allow for release of levy). These are two different concepts. Meeting TAS’s economic burden case criteria does not automatically qualify the taxpayer for relief under IRC 6343(a)(1)(D), economic hardship. 13.1.18.3 (08-25-2021) Essential Components of Working a TAS Case The five essential components of working TAS cases are: Disclosure Issues and Taxpayer Authentication; The Case Acceptance Determination; The Relief/Documentation Determination; The OAR Expedite Determination; and The 7811 Significant Hardship Determination. 13.1.18.3.1 (08-25-2021) Disclosure Issues and Taxpayer Authentication As an IRS employee, TAS employees are responsible for protecting tax returns and tax return information and Privacy Act records. See IRC 6103, which contains provisions for protecting and disclosing confidential returns or return information. The Privacy Act (5 USC 552a(c)) protects the confidentiality of records retrieved by an identifier for an individual. See IRM 11.3, Disclosure of Official Information, concerning disclosure situations. All TAS employees are responsible for verifying that they are speaking with the correct taxpayer/representative. Follow the guidance in IRM 21.1.3.2.3, Required Taxpayer Authentication, and IRM 21.1.3.2.4, Additional Taxpayer Authentication. For information on Power of Attorney (POA) or representatives, follow IRM 21.1.3.3, Third Party (POA/TIA/F706) Authentication, and IRM 13.1.23.3, General Disclosure Rules. For information on Congressional Authentication, see IRM 13.1.8.7, Disclosure Issues. Caution: Authentications must be made with any person(s) not previously authenticated. For example, if a TAS employee contacts the other spouse on a married-filing-jointly (MFJ) return or another POA listed on Form 2848, Power of Attorney and Declaration of Representative, the identity of that person must also be authenticated. Prior to providing authorized tax return information to the individual, ask the taxpayer/representative for identifying information and conduct IDRS research to validate the taxpayer's/representative’s responses (e.g., name and Taxpayer Identification Number (TIN)). For a list of the research command codes, refer to IRM 21.1.3.2.3(10), Required Taxpayer Authentication. Intake and Case Advocates may use the TAMIS Radio Button checkbox, "Made Positive Identification of TP," which is located on the "Initial Action Screen" when: The contact is an initial contact; The contact is conducted verbally; and The case involves only one individual on an account, (e.g., the wife or the husband on a Married Filing Jointly (MFJ) account). If you are working with both taxpayers, do not use the radio button; instead document the information in the TAMIS history; or If the case involves a BMF Sole Proprietor when the caller is the owner and disclosure can be verified. This is because the Sole Proprietor is the only individual responsible for the business. Note: This authority does not extend to employees of the business. This radio button should not be used for others such as the Power of Attorney (POA), Third-Party Designee (TPD), Congressional Aide, employee of the business, etc., the TAMIS History Screen should be documented for this purpose. See IRM 11.3.2.4.17, Sole Proprietorships. Caution: When the contact involves a single-member LLC, the parties who may be entitled to tax information about the LLC may differ, depending on the type of tax and tax period(s) involved, as sometimes the owner of the LLC is not the taxpayer. See IRM 11.3.2.4.16, Limited Liability Companies (LLC). If more than one TAS employee contacts the taxpayer on the same case, all subsequent employees must also authenticate the taxpayer’s identification before disclosing any information. If the TAS case involves more than one taxpayer, the TAS employee must document the authentication of each taxpayer (e.g., the wife or the husband) in the TAMIS history. Document actions regarding the authentication of the taxpayer and any verification of third party authorizations on TAMIS. Note: If documenting in the TAMIS history, consider using the acronym for Disclosure Verification, "DV," or High-Risk Disclosure Verification, “HRDV.” If a subsequent contact is made with a taxpayer or representative previously authenticated and the TAS employee recognizes the voice, additional taxpayer authentication is not necessary. 13.1.18.3.2 (08-25-2021) Case Acceptance Determination The case acceptance determination may take place before the case is assigned to a TAS employee. Generally, TAS accepts inquiries under Criteria 1 through 4 on the belief that there is an economic burden. Whether an economic burden exists to warrant relief, however, will depend on the facts and circumstances in each inquiry, as well as the information/documentation provided by the taxpayer or information discovered while working the case. See IRM 13.1.7, Taxpayer Advocate Service (TAS) Case Criteria. Here’s a general approach to TAS case acceptance. Consider: Does the taxpayer have an economic burden? (Criteria 1-4) If not, does the taxpayer have a systemic burden? (Criteria 5-7) If not, does the taxpayer’s case raise any issue of taxpayer rights or inequitable treatment? (Criteria 8) If not, is the taxpayer’s case included in categories designated by the National Taxpayer Advocate as a Public Policy case? (Criteria 9). If the taxpayer's inquiry does not meet any of the above criteria, the taxpayer's issue does not qualify for TAS assistance. Of course, TAS will be as helpful and compassionate as possible to a taxpayer/representative whose inquiry we cannot accept. TAS will direct the taxpayer/representative where to go for help and attempt to put the taxpayer/representative in direct contact with an IRS employee who can help with the problem whenever possible. Remind the taxpayer/representative that he or she might become eligible for TAS assistance in the future, if the IRS does not resolve the problem. See IRM 13.1.16.15, Contacts Not Meeting TAS Criteria (Nonfrivolous Inquiries), for procedures for inquiries that are not frivolous and do not meet TAS criteria. 13.1.18.3.3 (08-25-2021) Relief/Documentation Determination Ask the taxpayer for documentation only after determining if that documentation is appropriate for relief. Employees will use internal resources when available, to obtain documentation to resolve the issue so as not to burden taxpayers, especially if they have previously submitted documentation to the IRS. When asking the taxpayer to provide documentation, ensure the documentation supports the relief the taxpayer is entitled to or eligible for. Document TAMIS with the actions necessary to provide relief and the items requested to help move the case toward resolution. Don’t ask for unnecessary information. However, you should try to obtain information that will support TAS's position for relief. For example, when the taxpayer needs a levy released under IRC 6343(a)(1), the TAS employee should secure documentation that supports a legal basis for levy release, which involves checking the regulations and IRM to verify what documentation is needed by the function to obtain the levy release. TAS does not ask taxpayers to validate their hardship as a prerequisite to accepting their issue as a criteria 1 through 4 case. Requiring a taxpayer to send in documentation of a hardship before beginning to work the case wastes taxpayer and TAS employees’ time, delays relief, and often requires the taxpayer to obtain documentation that is unnecessary for the ultimate relief requested. Once the case has been accepted, documentation of a hardship will only be requested when the documentation is necessary and appropriate to secure relief. TAS classifies a taxpayer’s case based on their determination of which criteria best fits the taxpayer’s situation. TAS employees will use their best judgment in making this classification decision. Where TAS later discovers that a case better fits other criteria, see IRM 13.1.18.5(3), Initial Actions. TAS will continue to monitor case criteria accuracy to identify trends and provide relevant training. 13.1.18.3.4 (08-25-2021) OAR Expedite Determination The third component in working TAS cases is the OAR Expedite Determination. According to IRM 13.1.19.3, Expedite Processing of OARs, the facts and circumstances particular to a taxpayer’s case may necessitate that the case be worked more quickly than normal case timeframes. TAS will generally request expedite processing of an OAR in cases where the failure to take the specific action requested will cause the taxpayer economic harm or burden, extended delays have occurred, repeated IRS failures to resolve the problem have taken place, the taxpayer is suffering significant health issues which may improve with earlier resolution, or when time frames or statute considerations necessitate that case issues be worked sooner. Given the facts in this taxpayer’s case, does this OAR need to be handled expeditiously? Example: You may have a Criteria 1 case in which the manual refund needs to be expedited but the audit reconsideration of the underlying tax liability does not need to be expedited. On the other hand, you may have a Criteria 7 case that involves a taxpayer who has been unsuccessfully trying to resolve his issue for two and a half years. That taxpayer should not have to wait another day for resolution, so that case may need to be expedited. 13.1.18.3.5 (08-25-2021) 7811 Significant Hardship Determination “Significant Hardship” comes into play after you have decided what relief you are going to give the taxpayer and when you determine if the Local Taxpayer Advocate (LTA) can issue a TAO under IRC 7811 and the 7811 regulations. See IRM 13.1.20, TAS Taxpayer Assistance Order (TAO) Process. When making a 7811 “Significant Hardship” determination, consider: Is there a serious privation caused or about to be caused to the taxpayer because of the manner in which the IRS is administering the revenue laws per Treas. Reg. 301.7811-1(a)(4)(ii))? Does the taxpayer face an immediate threat of adverse action per IRC 7811(a)(2)(A)? Note: The regulations state that serious privation is more than mere inconvenience, economic or otherwise. Serious privation can include being deprived of taxpayer rights as well as tangible property. Has the taxpayer experienced a delay of more than 30 days in resolving taxpayer account problems? (IRC 7811(a)(2)(B)) Will the taxpayer incur significant costs (including fees for professional representation) if relief is not granted? (IRC 7811(a)(2)(C)) Will there be irreparable injury to, or a long-term adverse impact on the taxpayer if relief is not granted? (IRC 7811(a)(2)(D)) If the IRS has not followed its published administrative guidance (including the IRM) during the case, TAS shall construe the factors it considers in deciding to issue a TAO in the manner most favorable to the taxpayer. (IRC 7811(a)(3)). Remember that we are taxpayer advocates. Congress has not asked us to judge the taxpayer. Rather, Congress has asked us to help taxpayers resolve their problems with the IRS and to identify the underlying causes of those problems. As taxpayer advocates, we should point out misconceptions, educate taxpayers about their mistakes, and show them how to avoid future problems. We can also decline to take a case because the taxpayer “hop-scotched” over normal IRS procedures. See IRM 13.1.16.15, Contacts Not Meeting TAS Criteria (Nonfrivolous Inquiries), for procedures for inquiries that are not frivolous and do not meet TAS criteria. Always try to see things first from the taxpayer’s perspective – how confusing, intimidating, and frustrating it can be to try to resolve a problem with the IRS. Never forget that. That’s why TAS exists – to help taxpayers resolve their problems with the IRS – case by case and systemically. 13.1.18.4 (08-25-2021) Time Frames for Taking Case Actions The time frames discussed in this IRM are the maximum allowed for taking case actions. Certain cases may involve issues that require TAS’s immediate attention and will be worked more expeditiously than this IRM suggests. TAS employees must review the specific facts and circumstances of certain time-sensitive cases received from his or her manager or acting designated official and take necessary actions to immediately address or resolve the time-sensitive issue(s). See IRM 13.1.16.8, Sources of TAS Cases and Initial Intake Actions. Example: TAS receives a case where the taxpayer needs a manual refund to relieve an economic burden. The overpayment will be offset to the taxpayer’s IRS tax liability unless the refund is requested before the tax assessment (23C) date. TAS must work this case immediately due to the impending offset. See IRM 21.4.6.5.11.1, Offset Bypass Refund (OBR). Specific dates must be used by TAS employees when identifying, taking, or requesting actions of any kind (e.g., conducting additional research or contacting the taxpayer). These dates should be reasonable and established using appropriate guidelines. Use of these dates keeps the case moving from intake to resolution, and enables any employee involved in the case to monitor and track the actions taken. A Follow-Up Date (FUD) is a date established to move the case toward resolution. A FUD documents when TAS plans to take the next case action. If TAS fails to set a FUD, TAS only has five workdays from the last action to take the next action. If TAS establishes a FUD, TAS must take the follow-up action within five workdays of the established FUD. Exception: If the FUD is set during case intake, TAS employees must complete the action by the FUD. FUDs must be documented in TAMIS on the History Screen or by updating the Case Action Screen to reflect the date established. A Next Contact Date (NCD) is a date given to the taxpayer or representative as to when TAS will make the next contact. TAS will remain in contact with the taxpayer or representative until the closing contact is made and will keep the case open long enough to ensure effective resolution of the case. See IRM 13.1.21, Closing TAS Cases. Contacts with the taxpayer or representative must be made on or before the NCD promised. If a taxpayer or representative calls the case advocate or manager before the established NCD, a call back must be returned generally within 24 hours or the next business day. If contacts are made by correspondence, the letter must be mailed on or before the NCD for the next contact date to be considered timely. If the case is complex or if resolution of the taxpayer’s issue(s) may take several months to resolve, advise the taxpayer or representative and schedule NCDs at least every 30 calendar days. Contact dates may be more often; however, to schedule NCDs beyond 30 calendar days, you must obtain and document the taxpayer’s or representative’s verbal consent. Document the extended NCD agreement, along with the basis for extending the NCD beyond the normal 30-day timeframe, in the TAMIS history. If the taxpayer or representative specifically requests “no contact” until the issue is resolved, document the TAMIS history with the no contact request. Generally, TAS will set a NCD and FUD after every contact whether verbal or written. If TAS fails to establish a NCD, TAS must contact the taxpayer, either verbally or in writing, within five workdays of the last contact and establish a new NCD. Exception: A quick closure case will not require a NCD if the issue is completely resolved by the Intake Advocate while on the phone with the taxpayer. See IRM 13.1.16.16.2.1, Quick Closure Cases Worked by Intake Advocates. Exception: When a second request letter has been issued, a NCD is not necessary because the date given for the taxpayer to respond is considered both a follow-up date and a closing date if the taxpayer does not respond. Another attempt to contact the taxpayer will not be made. If you are unable to reach the taxpayer on or before the NCD and the taxpayer gave approval to leave a message on the answering machine, ensure all requirements in IRM 13.1.6.7, Leaving Messages on Answering Machines, are met by documenting the TAMIS history before leaving a message. Note: If the taxpayer provides oral consent to leave confidential information on the taxpayer’s answering machine or voicemail, the Intake or Case Advocate must document this conversation in TAMIS before leaving confidential information at the taxpayer’s phone number. Reminder: You cannot leave confidential information on a representative's answering machine or voicemail. An Estimated Completion Date (ECD) is an estimated date for case resolution, communicated to the taxpayer or representative, and documented in the TAMIS history. Use the Estimated Completion Date Tool, to determine the estimated completion time frame and convert the time frame given to the taxpayer to a date for Initial Action Screen input. If the ECD is revised, provide the revised ECD to the taxpayer. Otherwise, provide the new ECD during the next contact and document TAMIS. TAS Case Advocate Letter 2903L, Interim Letter, may be used to provide this information. Provide a revised ECD during the next contact if the ECD expires after leaving a NCD. 13.1.18.5 (08-25-2021) Initial Actions This section describes the actions that TAS will take within three workdays of the Taxpayer Advocate Received Date (TARD) for Criteria 1–4 cases and within five workdays of the TARD for Criteria 5–9 cases. Actions that are not taken within these timeframes should be taken on the first available date afterwards. TAS employees need to take the following actions in this section, if appropriate, as part of their initial case actions and establish reasonable follow-up dates for all pending actions. Review the TAS Case Criteria Code to determine if it is correct. There are two types of errors that may result in incorrect coding: administrative errors and factual errors. Generally, the criteria code will not be changed on a case unless the incorrect code was input on the case when the case was taken into TAS and an administrative or factual error occurred. Administrative errors arise when, by mistake or accident, criteria codes are incorrectly selected or input on TAMIS. Example: Based on the TAMIS history, the taxpayer will suffer a long-term adverse impact if action is not taken, and should have been coded as “4.” Due to a typing error, the case was accidentally entered on TAMIS with Criteria Code “3.” Factual errors occur when the facts presented by the taxpayer are incorrect. These facts, as presented, justify the selection of one criteria code upon case intake, when in fact another code applies to the taxpayer’s situation. Example: A taxpayer in California calls TAS concerning an IRS levy on his wages and claims that he will be unable to buy groceries for his large family if the levy is not released. He states he has an outstanding tax liability from his 2019 Federal income tax return, but he filed an amended 2019 return six months ago which will result in a zero balance. He has heard nothing from the IRS about the correction. The case is accepted into TAS as a criteria 1 case. TAS researches the account and determines that no levy has been issued but the taxpayer has received a notice of intent to levy. The account is still in notice status so the TAS employee inputs a STAUP to delay further collection activity. The facts presented by the taxpayer were incorrect; the taxpayer is not facing economic harm from IRS actions. The TAS employee changes the criteria code to 5 because the taxpayer experienced a delay of more than 30 days in resolving his tax issue. A factual error does NOT exist when more than one criteria code applies to a case, and the code picked on the case is not the one that would offer the most benefit or is of most concern to the taxpayer. If the code chosen is also correct, no factual error was made and the criteria code on the case should not be changed. Conduct additional research. Research IDRS and other IRS databases to determine the status of the issue and if there are any controls by an Operating Division (OD) or Functional Unit. Use the Research field on the TAMIS Initial Actions Screen to document research conducted. Example: A taxpayer contacts TAS because she claims she submitted the documentation Exam requested. TAS researches IDRS and determines the EITC audit has been closed. Based on the research TAS changes the PCIC from 630-Open EITC Audit to 639-EITC Reconsideration. Control the case on IDRS. Open an IDRS control base on all affected accounts and modules. Document this on the TAMIS Initial Actions Screen by entering the date in the “IDRS Control“ Established Date field. If a TAS control base exists on the account (e.g., opened by an Intake Advocate), update the control base to reflect the IDRS number of the TAS employee assigned to the case. If a control base was opened inadvertently on a module during intake, for an account that will not be worked by TAS, the employee assigned the case will close the control. Suspend Collection Activity. Attempt to suspend all lien filings and levy actions, including blocking levies under the Automated Levy Program (e.g., Federal Payment Levy Program (FPLP) and State Income Tax Levy Program (SITLP)), until a final decision on the issue is made. Input STAUPs, request Automated Collection System (ACS) holds, block FPLP and SITLP, and contact Revenue Officers, as appropriate. Document your actions and date of action on the TAMIS Initial Actions Screen or TAMIS History Screen. Document, in the TAMIS History, items that cannot be captured on the Initial Actions Screen. If you are unable to suspend a notice, lien filing, or levy action prior to issuance, notify the taxpayer immediately. See IRM 13.1.10.11, Suspending Collection Action, for additional information. If it will take more than three (3) workdays to suspend lien filings and levy action, negotiate a completion date for the suspension with the OD/Functional unit. Document POA Information. When a representative is involved, document the name, contact information, and authorization on the TAMIS POA Screen. TAS employees will input each third party listed on the Form 2848, Power of Attorney and Declaration of Representative, or Form 8821, Tax Information Authorization, with whom he or she is actively working on the TAS case, in the Contact Section of the POA Screen. The Contact Section should be updated when changes are made to the POA. If there are multiple names on the Form 2848, or Form 8821, notate in the TAMIS History which individual is the appropriate contact for the issue TAS is working and that multiple names exist on CC CFINK. If another authorized individual from the firm steps in to assist with the case, additional POA screens can be completed at that time, after TAS receives a valid Form 2848, or Form 8821, identifying the individual(s). Follow local procedures when forwarding any POA forms not listed on IDRS. Document the date the Form 2848 or Form 8821 was sent to the CAF unit in the “Date Form 2848/8821 sent to CAF” field on the TAMIS POA Screen. If the taxpayer does not want the POA involved, revokes the POA’s authorization, or the representative withdraws his or her authorization, document the TAMIS history. See IRM 13.1.23.8, Direct Taxpayer Contact When Valid POA on File, IRM 13.1.23.10, Terminating Third Party Authorizations, and IRM 21.3.7.10, Deletions, Revocations and Withdrawals, for the procedures on revoking or withdrawing an authorization. Do not remove the representative’s record from the TAMIS POA Screen. Update the POA Screen to indicate the representative is no longer active. Note: TAS employees must respect, support, and vigorously protect the taxpayer’s fundamental right to retain representation. See IRM 13.1.23.2, Taxpayer’s Right to Retain Representation. Request Internal Information. Make requests for any information needed from internal sources. Order internal documents, if applicable. Prior to requesting an original return from the Files Function, first use the data available on AMS, EUP, and IDRS (RTVUE, BRTVU, RTFTP, IMFOLR, BMFOLR, TRDBV, and MEF, etc.) as a substitute for requesting the original return. If this does not provide the needed information, you may request any necessary taxpayer administrative files or returns using CC ESTABDV. Print or cut and paste the “Request Complete” screen from IDRS and include it in your case file or TAMIS history and set a FUD to track the status of the requested DLN. Note: If this is a re-open case, check the paper case file for a copy of the return. Do not fax Form 2275, Records Request, Charge and Recharge, to the Files Function as your initial action. Every campus has a Files Coordination point to service TAS cases. TAS cases are considered priority and Files employees make every effort to secure the requested return expeditiously. Check the CRRG, Campus Requirement and Routing Guide, for the procedures, contact information, follow-up information, and time frames for each campus. Third-Party Contacts. Determine whether a third-party contact is necessary and whether the taxpayer has already received notification of possible third-party contacts or signed a March 2000 (or later) revision of Form 911. The Form 911 provides notice to the taxpayer of the potential need to contact third parties in order to respond to the taxpayer’s request for assistance. When signing Form 911, the taxpayer is authorizing TAS to contact third parties. No further notification to the taxpayer is required. The taxpayer(s) or certain representatives (e.g., attorneys, Certified Public Accountants (CPAs), or enrolled agents) with a valid POA, Form 2848), may give authorization over the telephone to contact third parties. Follow the instructions listed in IRM 13.1.2.5, Third Party Contacts, when securing and documenting permissions to make third party contacts. Document permissions in TAMIS. Record third-party contacts on the TAMIS Third Party Contact Screen. When a Third-Party Contact is made by TAS, document TXMOD on IDRS. Do this by inputting CC REQ77, TC 971 AC 616, Third Party Contact notification made by Taxpayer Advocate. IRC 7811, Significant Hardship Determination. Determine if you have enough information to make an accurate IRC 7811, Significant Hardship Determination, or if additional information is needed to make this determination. If enough information exists, make the determination at this point in the case. For additional information, See IRM 13.1.18.9, Making an IRC 7811 Significant Hardship Determination. During case intake, Intake Advocates may complete certain initial actions when taxpayers contact TAS directly by phone or are transferred to TAS Intake by NTA Toll-free. The Intake Advocate receiving the call may document TAMIS Taxpayer Screen 3 with limited significant hardship information. The Case Advocate assigned to the case must review the information and update TAMIS to capture the facts and circumstances of the case as it develops. See IRM 13.1.18.9.2, Documenting an IRC 7811 Significant Hardship Determination on TAMIS, and IRM 13.1.18.9.3, Changing an IRC 7811 Significant Hardship Determination. Intake Advocates working a case to completion using the Quick Closure procedures are required to make an IRC 7811 determination of significant hardship. Intake Advocates will not be required to enter an “Explanation” on TAMIS Taxpayer Screen 3. Instead they will enter the literal “IA7811”. For those cases that are worked by a TAS employee other than an Intake Advocate, the TAS employee is required to enter an explanation in the 7811 Explanation field as appropriate. See IRM 13.1.18.9.2. The Initial Actions Screen on TAMIS assists TAS employees when documenting initial case actions and initial contacts. TAS employees are required to use the Initial Actions Screen. When entries on the Initial Actions Screen are saved, TAMIS systemically generates a new TAMIS History screen. This generated History Screen records that the Initial Actions Screen was completed (or updated) and the date the Initial Actions Screen activity was saved. This generated History Screen may be updated within the same business day (until midnight, Eastern Time). The Initial Actions Screen does not capture everything which might occur during the initial contact. TAS employees will use the TAMIS History Screen to document information not captured on the Initial Actions Screen. TAS can use either the generated TAMIS History Screen or create a new TAMIS History Screen to document any items and issues not included in the Initial Actions Screen. These items and issues include, but are not limited to: Disclosure verification (e.g., when additional taxpayer verification is needed due to multiple parties or multiple TAS employee contacts; Clarification of the taxpayer’s issue(s) and the relief requested/resolution needed; Modifications to Action Plans; Receiving authorization for third party contacts; and Documents requested from or by the taxpayer. Document in TAMIS all the information requested from the taxpayer, the due date provided to the taxpayer for the information, and other information discussed, relevant to the case. Example: TAS inputs a change of address on IDRS to update the address of record as requested by the taxpayer during the initial contact. Because the Initial Actions Screen does not capture the change of address made to IDRS and to TAMIS, document this action on the TAMIS History Screen. 13.1.18.5.1 (08-25-2021) Develop an Action Plan Review the case file, develop an initial Action Plan, and document the plan on the TAMIS Action Plan Screen. See IRM 13.4.5.3.3, Action Plan Screen. TAS employees are required to draft an Action Plan to address all issues for each case. An Action Plan is important because it facilitates proper case management and provides a road map for anyone who may need to review or take action on the case. Modify and update TAMIS as subsequent issues arise or changes are identified. For additional information see IRM 13.1.18.5, Initial Actions, and IRM 13.1.18.8, Subsequent Actions and Case Resolution. Example: Generic Action Plan Review case and file; Input controls; Contact TP; Conduct OAR research; Monitor account; Contact TP with status; Close case and case controls. Example: Well Developed Action Plan Secure 14039 and supporting info; Send OAR to KCSC AM to work case for ID theft and monitor for completion; Request 2019 return be processed, monitor for posting; Review options for 2018 account, discuss with TP; Send OAR to Exam IDTVA; Monitor account for Exam appeal request decision; Provide TP with outcome of case and provide education on IDT; Review case to ensure that all related issues are addressed/resolved. When working a Quick Closure case, TAS employees will enter the literal “QC” in the Action Plan field to indicate that this is a quick closure case. An Action Plan is not required for Quick Closure cases; however, TAS employees will continue to document the action taken on the case using TAMIS History Screens. See Exhibit 13.1.16-2, Quick Closure Reference Guide for Intake Advocates. The development of an Action Plan at the start of the case provides a better estimate of when the case can be completed. When a subsequent change to the initial or subsequent Action Plan increases the time needed to resolve the issues, provide a revised ECD to the taxpayer. See IRM 13.1.18.4(6), Time Frames for Taking Case Action. When developing your Action Plan and identifying or clarifying case issues, research appropriate records and internal resources and document your research on TAMIS (i.e., CABIC, CATL, SERP, IRMs, IGMs, etc.). After performing research, if you still need assistance with identifying case issues or developing an Action Plan, consult with your Lead Case Advocate (LCA), Manager, or Technical Advisor and document the details of your consultation(s) on TAMIS. 13.1.18.6 (08-25-2021) Initial Contact Completed by Case Advocates If the initial contact is not completed during case intake, contact the taxpayer or representative by telephone within three workdays of the TARD for criteria 1-4 cases, and within five workdays of the TARD for criteria 5-9 cases, to notify the taxpayer of TAS’s involvement and independence from the IRS. See IRM 13.1.2.4.2, Inform Taxpayer of TAS’s Independence. For taxpayers speaking a language other than English, see IRM 13.1.16.4.5, Assisting Taxpayers Speaking a Language Other Than English. Explain the confidentiality rule of IRC 7803(c)(4)(A)(iv). TAS personnel should also tell taxpayers that they will generally need to provide information to IRS personnel to resolve the taxpayer’s problem. See IRM 13.1.5.6, Communicating Confidentiality Rules to Taxpayers and Taxpayers’ Representatives. The following is an example of what TAS employees could tell a taxpayer or representative when he or she contacts TAS: The IRC gives TAS the discretion not to disclose certain information to the IRS. However, TAS will likely have to disclose to the IRS at least some of the information to obtain the assistance or relief you are requesting. It is important to secure all documentation needed to support case resolution. This documentation may be required by the OD/Functional Unit or may be required by TAS to take an action (e.g., issuing a manual refund) per the IRM or other procedural guidance. TAS will generally request from the taxpayer only the information required by the IRC, regulations, IRM, or other procedural guidance. Do not request documents from the taxpayer that are already present on IRS systems (e.g., CIS, AMS, RGS/CEAS, ALS). Document in TAMIS all the information requested from the taxpayer, the date the taxpayer has agreed to provide the documentation, and other information discussed, relevant to the case. Leaving a message on an answering machine is not considered an Initial Contact with the taxpayer. There are certain actions that must take place during initial contact that can only be satisfied by personal contact with the taxpayer or by sending a letter within the prescribed time frames. See IRM 13.1.6.7, for disclosure rules when leaving messages on answering machines. If you receive a transferred case after the initial acknowledgment (see TAS Letters, Transfer Letter 2902L), you are required to contact the taxpayer by the date promised. However, if the taxpayer has circumstances that would be made worse by waiting until the promised NCD or FUD, action must be taken sooner. See IRM 13.1.18.4, Time Frames for Taking Case Actions. For criteria 5 - 9 cases, if you can close your case within five workdays of the TARD and the taxpayer has not been notified of TAS case handling, you can use one contact, by telephone if possible, to notify the taxpayer of both TAS involvement and problem resolution. If you are not able to reach the taxpayer by telephone, send a letter by the fifth workday after the TARD. A letter is only appropriate when the taxpayer cannot be contacted by telephone. If a letter must be sent, it must be sent by the third workday after the TARD for criteria 1-4 cases, and by the fifth workday after the TARD for criteria 5-9 cases. Advise the taxpayer of your name, job title, address, telephone number, office hours, and ten-digit SmartID badge number. Explain to the taxpayer or representative that TAS has offices in all 50 states and Puerto Rico. See IRM 13.1.6.2, Oral Communication, IRM 21.1.1.4, Communication Skills, and IRM 10.5.7.7, Employee Identification Requirements. Provide a meaningful apology specific to the taxpayer’s issue, if appropriate. See IRM 13.1.6.5, Apology. Verify how the taxpayer’s inquiry came into TAS. Input or update the Outreach codes in TAMIS Taxpayer Screen 1, as appropriate. Clarify the taxpayer’s issue(s) and the relief or assistance requested. If, after the initial contact with the taxpayer, the TAS employee determines the original statement was unclear or incorrect, make the correction and document TAMIS. Upon clarification of the taxpayer’s issue(s) and the relief/assistance requested, update the TAMIS Primary Core or Secondary Core Issue Codes (PCIC and SCIC) and the TAMIS Action Plan Screen. Reminder: TAS employees use Issue Codes to denote the Primary and Secondary case issues. See IRM 13.1.16.18.1, Issue Codes. Example: During the initial contact, TAS clarifies that the taxpayer’s request for a “lien release” was a request to remove the wage levy. On TAMIS, while documenting the initial contact, the TAS employee updates the Issue Code, from 721, Lien Release, to 710, Levy. Use the Initial Actions Screen 2 on TAMIS to document initial contact actions and notate the date of the next action(s) (FUD/NCD). Document the TAMIS History with details of your conversation with the taxpayer, that are pertinent to the case. If you have not made an IRC 7811, Significant Hardship Determination, and you have enough information to make a determination, make it. See IRM 13.1.18.9. Request any documentation or information needed from the taxpayer or representative to provide relief/resolution. Information requested should pertain directly to the taxpayer’s issue(s) and the relief or assistance needed. Agree on a due date for the taxpayer/representative to provide the information. Document TAMIS with a description of the information requested and the due date. Provide the taxpayer with a NCD and notate on TAMIS. Note: If a NCD is not given, you must contact the taxpayer within five workdays of your last contact. For those cases where the taxpayer’s issue(s) can be resolved within 24 hours and subsequent contact with the taxpayer is unnecessary, a NCD is not required. When the initial contact is conducted during intake, employees will set the NCD for three workdays following the TARD for criteria 1 through 4 cases. When the initial contact is conducted during intake, employees will set the NCD for ten workdays following the TARD for criteria 5 through 9 cases. When the employee identifies specific facts and circumstances of certain time-sensitive issues where the taxpayer could be adversely impacted because TAS did not take actions to immediately address or resolve the time-sensitive issue(s), he or she will discuss the case with the manager to determine whether the case requires immediate assignment. If the manager determines the case requires immediate assignment, he or she will alert the manager of the receiving office within one workday and document the TAMIS history. Provide the taxpayer with an ECD and notate on TAMIS. Inform taxpayers what TAS will do to resolve their issue(s), based on what you know from initial research and discussion with the taxpayer. The Taxpayer Bill of Rights (TBOR), groups the existing rights in the tax code into ten fundamental rights and makes them clear, understandable, and accessible. The rights are: (a) The Right to Be Informed. (b) The Right to Quality Service. (c) The Right to Pay No More than the Correct Amount of Tax. (d) The Right to Challenge the IRS’s Position and Be Heard. (e) The Right to Appeal an IRS Decision in an Independent Forum. (f) The Right to Finality. (g) The Right to Privacy. (h) The Right to Confidentiality. (i) The Right to Retain Representation. (j) The Right to a Fair and Just Tax System. Taxpayers have always had these Rights but often were not aware of them. These Rights are now part of Pub 1, Your Rights as a Taxpayer, and are codified in IRC 7803(a)(3). During communications with taxpayers, TAS employees will verify the taxpayer is aware of and understands TBOR and will also discuss any applicable rights (unique to the taxpayer’s case) based upon information available at the time). TAS employees may use the TAS Taxpayer Bill of Rights website to assist with these discussions and will document the discussion and the taxpayer’s understanding of TBOR in TAMIS. Document the specific right(s) discussed regarding the taxpayer’s issue(s). Exception: If the history reflects a prior employee (for example the Intake Advocate or previously assigned Case Advocate) addressed TBOR with the taxpayer on the original issue(s), the newly assigned employee does not have to duplicate the efforts. When sending written communications, in additional to highlighting specific rights (when applicable), TAS employees may include Pub 1 as an attachment to ensure the taxpayer is aware of and understands TBOR. 13.1.18.7 (08-25-2021) Assisting Taxpayers with Economic Burdens (Criteria 1-4 Cases) Criteria Code 1-4 cases involve situations in which taxpayers request assistance due to an economic burden, and obtaining this assistance is usually the taxpayers’ utmost concern. Once the economic burden is alleviated, there may be other problems or issues that TAS needs to resolve before a case can be closed. Example: The release of a levy on the taxpayer’s wages will alleviate the economic burden on the taxpayer. However, the taxpayer may still need TAS to assist in locating and crediting a missing payment to his account that will satisfy the tax liability. Generally, TAS’s priority when working an economic burden case is to determine if action(s) can be taken to alleviate the taxpayer’s economic burden, and if so, to provide the necessary assistance to the taxpayer. Note: Not all taxpayers will want or need relief from the economic burden but may need TAS’s assistance in resolving other types of problems. There may be more than one way to assist taxpayers. TAS may grant or partially grant the action that was requested by the taxpayer, or may provide an alternative solution. Example: A self-employed taxpayer requests that a levy on one of his accounts receivables be released. After speaking with the taxpayer and the Revenue Officer, and reviewing the taxpayer’s financial information, the Case Advocate recommends a partial release of the levy, in which the taxpayer will be allowed the amount of money needed to relieve the economic burden. The decision to alleviate the taxpayer’s economic burden will be based on the pertinent facts of the case and TAS’s ability to grant the relief based on the IRC, regulations, and IRS guidance such as that found in the Internal Revenue Manual (IRM). It is not possible to provide an all-encompassing set of guidelines. OARs and TAOs must be considered and used when TAS does not have the authority to take the action needed. If necessary, discuss the issue with a Lead Case Advocate (LCA), Technical Advisor, Manager, LTA, or the Division Counsel/Associate Chief Counsel (National Taxpayer Advocate) Program. See IRM 13.1.12.1.2, Requesting Assistance from Technical Advisors, and IRM 13.1.10.2, Obtaining Legal Advice from Chief Counsel. It may not be possible to alleviate the taxpayer’s economic burden because the law prevents TAS from taking the necessary actions. Advise the taxpayer why TAS cannot assist or provide relief and that the taxpayer has the right to speak to the LTA. Work with the taxpayer to resolve any other case issues. If an economic burden case is determined to meet IRC 7811 (see IRM 13.1.18.5(10), Initial Actions, and the TAS employee decides that the relief requested by the taxpayer is not warranted, see IRM 13.1.21.2.1(7)(a), Closing Actions. Do not deny relief solely because a taxpayer is not current with filing returns. The taxpayer may need assistance in obtaining the information necessary to prepare the returns. 13.1.18.8 (08-25-2021) Subsequent Actions and Case Resolution Use subsequent contacts to further remind or inform taxpayers of the Taxpayer Bill of Rights (TBOR). Ask taxpayers if they have any questions concerning their rights. If a new issue presents itself during the case that involves or impacts TBOR, discuss the additional applicable right(s) (unique to the taxpayer’s case) with the taxpayer, and ensure the taxpayer understands the right(s). Document the discussion in TAMIS. See IRM 13.1.18.6(21), for more information and guidance on addressing TBOR in written communication. Subsequent case actions should focus on resolving the taxpayer’s problems and moving the case toward closure. These actions may involve reviewing and acting on information received from the taxpayer, contacting the taxpayer to acknowledge receipt of information, contacting third parties to request information, and conducting additional research. Document your actions on TAMIS within two workdays of when you took the action. If TAMIS is unavailable, document your actions on TAMIS within two workdays of when TAMIS becomes available and notate the date of your actions. Documentation on TAMIS should include pertinent details of your conversations with taxpayers, representatives, and IRS and TAS employees concerning the case. This includes the specific documentation you requested from the taxpayer and what the taxpayer provided. Case documentation should be detailed enough so that anyone without prior knowledge of the case can read the case history and readily determine what actions have taken place and what needs to be done to resolve the taxpayer’s issue(s). Continue to use FUDs and NCDs and take case actions timely. Keep the taxpayer informed of actions taken and actions TAS will take. Provide the taxpayer or representative with a revised ECD, as necessary. See IRM 13.1.18.4(6), Time Frames for Taking Case Actions. As actions are taken and the case progresses, update any TAMIS data fields as necessary. Examples of fields which may change or require additional input (although not all-inclusive) include the Case Factors Screen, PIC and SIC Codes, POA Screens, OAR Screens, and the Action Plan Screen. Update and revise the initial plan of action on the TAMIS Action Plan Screen, and the subsequent plans of action(s) within two workdays of when a new issue, time frame, process, or procedure is identified. Document on TAMIS the issue and the action necessary to resolve the case. Document the performance and the outcomes of the actions that are listed on the TAMIS Action Plan Screen. This documentation includes canceling a planned action. The action plan, together with the documentation in the TAMIS History, of the performance and the outcomes of each planned action, provides a road map for anyone to follow: The planned actions; The performance and the outcomes of those planned actions; and The planned actions that must still be done on the case. Reminder: A planned action input on the TAMIS Action Plan Screen cannot be changed after midnight (Eastern Time) of the day it is input. Therefore, to modify or change a planned action on the TAMIS Action Plan Screen, it will be necessary to add another planned action on the Action Plan Screen or to document the change in the TAMIS History. If you have enough information to make an accurate IRC 7811, Significant Hardship Determination, make the determination on TAMIS Taxpayer Screen 3. Verify the TAMIS information is correct and complete during your initial review. Some of the data initially loaded on the e-911, Electronic Request for Taxpayer Assistance Order (and Application for Taxpayer Assistance Order), from the Account Management System (AMS) and then loaded on TAMIS may be incomplete or outdated, as some of the information is retrieved from IDRS. Therefore, ensure that the TAMIS information is correct and complete. Later, as the case develops, update the appropriate TAMIS Screens and fields, as necessary. 13.1.18.8.1 (08-25-2021) Reviewing and Requesting Information from Taxpayers Upon receipt of information previously requested from the taxpayer/representative during the initial or subsequent contacts, conduct a quick read of any information the taxpayer or representative provides to determine if an immediate action is required. If no immediate action is required, review the information and determine if the information is enough to take the next step toward resolution, no later than five workdays from the previous established FUD on TAMIS for receipt of the information. Document TAMIS with pertinent details of your conversations with taxpayers and representatives and upload the documents to TAMIS (see IRM 13.1.11.2.1.4, Document Attachments). This includes the specific documentation you requested from the taxpayer and what the taxpayer provided. Case documentation should be detailed enough so that anyone without prior knowledge of the case can read the case history and readily determine what actions have taken place and what needs to be done to resolve the taxpayer’s issues. If the information is insufficient or not received by the date specified, or if an alternate date extended at the request of the taxpayer, a second request for the information must be made. The second request must be in writing and documented and a copy uploaded to TAMIS to clearly establish the intent of the request. See IRM 13.1.11.2.1.4, and TAS Case Advocate Letter 1671L, Second Request for Information. Include a due date for receipt of the information, allowing at least five workdays for receipt. Consider mail time to and from the taxpayer’s location when setting the due date. Include an explanation of the consequences of non-response (e.g., TAS will close the case and enforced collection activity will resume or a refund cannot be expedited, etc.). Provide the amount due on the taxpayer’s accounts, including penalty and interest, and provide the date through which the figures are computed. If the letter issued to the taxpayer does not meet the requirements per IRM 13.1.21.2.2.20, No or Partial Reply from Taxpayer, it is not considered a “second request” letter and does not meet the NCD exception per IRM 13.1.18.4(4)(f), Time Frames for Taking Case Actions. The TAS employee will have five (5) workdays from the date of the letter to contact the taxpayer and establish a NCD. If the TAS employee fails to contact the taxpayer and establish a NCD within five (5) workdays, it will constitute a missed NCD. If the taxpayer or representative does not provide the information by the due date, take any actions you can with the information you have available. If the taxpayer is having trouble gathering documentation required by the IRS, provide suggestions for alternative documentation that may be suitable. An important component of advocacy is listening to the taxpayer, identifying unique facts, circumstances, or challenges the taxpayer may face in dealing with the IRS, and proposing alternatives to support the taxpayer’s eligibility for relief. Be sure to document the details of your conversations in the TAMIS History. Third parties may be able to provide documentation when the taxpayer is not in possession of certain documents. See IRM 13.1.2.5, Third Party Contacts. Example: The taxpayer contacts TAS for assistance in securing an Offset Bypass Refund (OBR) due to an economic burden. The taxpayer needs the refund to secure housing and pay for food, as she is only working part-time and is currently staying in a homeless shelter. The taxpayer has no bank account and can only provide a paystub showing her year-to-date earnings. The TAS employee obtains authorization from the taxpayer to contact the shelter’s director to get confirmation that the taxpayer has been staying at the shelter for the last six weeks. The LTA provides a signed statement confirming that the taxpayer’s hardship was verified through oral testimony of the shelter director. The TAS employee attaches the LTA’s statement to the manual refund paperwork, along with a financial statement showing that when national standards are applied, the taxpayer does not have enough income to meet necessary living expenses. See IRM 3.17.79.3.3, Issuing Hardship Refunds. Example: The taxpayer contacts TAS for assistance with an open audit of the Schedule C income reported on her tax return. The taxpayer supplemented her wages by cleaning houses. Her customers paid her in cash, and she did not deposit the earnings into her bank account; instead she used them to put gas in her car and pay for groceries. She obtained customers through referrals from members of her church. After obtaining authorization from the taxpayer, the TAS employee contacts the church pastor, who provides a notarized statement with the names of individuals within the church that had their houses cleaned by the taxpayer. The TAS employee also learns that the taxpayer uses a paper planner to keep track of appointments, including her cleaning jobs. In the planner, she included the customer’s last name and the date and time of the cleaning appointment. The taxpayer brings the planner to a face-to-face meeting with the TAS employee, who copies the pages with cleaning appointments to attach to the OAR, along with the signed statement from the church pastor. See IRM 13.1.24.4.1.3, Advocacy through Securing Taxpayer Documentation to Prove EITC Eligibility. Example: During a subsequent contact, the taxpayer tells TAS to work with an attorney he recently hired, and provides a completed, signed Form 2848, Power of Attorney and Declaration of Representative. At the time of the contact, the TAS employee documents the taxpayer’s request in the TAMIS History Screen, adds the contact information to the TAMIS POA Screen, and forwards the Form 2848 to the Centralized Authorization File (CAF) Unit so it can be added to IDRS. If the actions cannot be taken due to lack of information from the taxpayer, close the case as “no response.” See IRM 13.1.21.2.2.20, No or Partial Reply from Taxpayer. Actions should be taken to assist the taxpayer as soon as the TAS employee has enough information required for the actions to be taken. If the actions necessary to resolve the case are beyond the authority of TAS, request assistance from the appropriate OD/Functional Unit using an OAR. 13.1.18.8.2 (08-25-2021) Taking Actions to Resolve Case Issues Take actions to assist the taxpayer as soon as you have obtained enough information to do so. If you have questions as to whether the information provided is sufficient to determine if the taxpayer is entitled and/or eligible for the relief requested, what actions should be taken, how to take these actions, or need any other assistance in making an advocacy determination or resolving a case, consult with your Lead Case Advocate, Manager, or a Technical Advisor. See IRM 13.1.12.1.2, Requesting Assistance from Technical Advisors. If the actions necessary to resolve the case are beyond the authority of TAS, request assistance from the appropriate OD/Functional Unit using an OAR. See IRM 13.1.4, TAS Authority, and IRM 13.1.19, TAS Operations Assistance Request (OAR) Process). OARs that require expedited actions must be submitted within one workday, once the OAR is sufficiently developed. OARs that do not require expedited actions should be submitted within five workdays once the OAR is sufficiently developed. See IRM 13.1.19. Follow up on any OARs or requests for information, as applicable. Document your requests, discussions, and any information obtained or discussed with the OD/Function in the TAMIS History or OAR Screens. If the OD/Function fails to complete the requested actions outlined on the OAR by the date promised, elevate the case to your manager for intervention or Taxpayer Assistance Order (TAO) consideration. See IRM 13.1.19.6, OARs - Operating Division or Functional Unit Disagrees - Action Not Taken, IRM 13.1.7.4, Same Day Resolution by Operations, and IRM 13.1.20.1, Taxpayer Assistance Order (TAO) Process. Taxpayers have the right to appeal an IRS decision in an independent forum, which means they are entitled to a fair and impartial administrative appeal of most IRS decisions, including many penalties, and generally have the right to take their cases to court. When working cases, TAS can support this right by educating taxpayers about their appeal rights, including how to exercise them, the consequences of not doing so, and ensuring the IRS provides an impartial hearing. For example, TAS can educate taxpayers about how to request audit consideration, protest a math error, respond to a Statutory Notice of Deficiency, appeal an Offer in Compromise (OIC) rejection, proposed Installment Agreement denial, or request a Collection Due Process (CDP) hearing or Collection Appeals Program hearing. In addition to supporting taxpayers while they exercise their administrative appeal rights, TAS can support a taxpayer’s right to a judicial appeal, by helping to build a robust administrative record during a CDP hearing or other administrative appeal, which may be helpful later if the taxpayer chooses to take his or her case to court. 13.1.18.8.3 (08-25-2021) Taxpayers Delivering Returns to TAS and TAS Date Stamp Any tax return mailed to TAS is not considered filed with the IRS until it is received by an authorized IRS office. As discussed below, there are designated places for filing, and those places do not include a TAS office. Further, the postmark rule described in IRC 7502 does not apply unless the return was properly addressed to the office with which the return was required to be filed. The date a return is considered “filed with the IRS” has significant consequences. For example, the date the return is filed starts the general three-year period in which the IRS has to assess tax for that tax year. See IRC 6501. Similarly, the date the return is filed starts the general three-year period in which a taxpayer has to claim a credit or refund of tax for the tax year. See IRC 6511. IRC 6091 and the corresponding Treasury regulations provide guidance on the proper place to file tax returns and provide that individual taxpayers generally have the following options for places to file their income tax returns: With any person assigned the responsibility to receive returns in the IRS local office where that individual taxpayer legally resides or has a principal place of business; At a campus serving the local office referred to in (a); If the instructions to the return require filing with a campus, with the applicable campus; or Hand carried to any person assigned the responsibility to receive hand-carried returns in the local IRS office serving the individual taxpayer’s legal residence or principal place of business. Note: Instructions for the tax forms specify the campus where taxpayers must file. A return is considered properly filed if the IRS employee to whom the return is hand-carried has been delegated the authority to accept hand-carried returns. Note: TAS employees have not been delegated the authority to receive hand-carried returns and must transmit the return to the IRS for filing. A return hand-delivered to a TAS employee is not considered filed with the IRS until an authorized office receives it. TAS must date-stamp returns with a TAS received date. That received date, however, does not mean the return has been “filed with the IRS.” If TAS receives a return that is time sensitive, (e.g., received on the due date for filing or on the last day a taxpayer can claim a refund), and it is not possible to get the original document to the appropriate Campus Operating Division that same day, fax a copy of the return on the day of receipt along with a statement from the taxpayer that it is a faxed signature and it is a legal document, and then follow procedures in (7). If TAS receives a return either by mail or hand-carried, the TAS employee should take the following action: If the taxpayer wants to submit a return to TAS, advise the taxpayer that TAS is not authorized to receive returns and provide the appropriate address for the taxpayer to submit the return or direct the taxpayer to the nearest walk-in office or Taxpayer Assistance Center (TAC). Advise the taxpayer to file the return at the proper location and deliver a copy to TAS. If the taxpayer refuses to file the return directly with the appropriate IRS office and the TAS employee has no choice but to accept the return, the employee must stamp TAS’s received date on the document and forward it to the proper filing location. If the original document is not needed to resolve a TAS case (because a copy of the document will suffice), transmit the document via Form 3210, Document Transmittal, within one workday, to the taxpayer’s proper filing location for normal processing. A copy of the document should be kept with the TAS case file and the copy used to resolve the TAS case issues. If the original document MUST be used to resolve a TAS case, the TAS employee will transmit the original document via an OAR to the appropriate Campus Operating Division, within one workday of receipt, with a request to process the document. For any situation where TAS ends up with a return in its possession, educate the taxpayer as to why returns have not been properly filed until received by the proper location. The procedures in paragraph (7) above also apply to amended returns and claims. Regardless of the type of return the taxpayer is attempting to file, mailing or hand-delivering a return to a TAS employee does not constitute filing with the IRS; and TAS is required to send the document to the correct location as soon as possible. Similarly, any document (e.g.,Form 8857, Request for Innocent Spouse Relief, or Form 12153, Request for a Collection Due Process or Equivalent Hearing) required to be filed at an IRS campus must be filed at the campus to be considered properly filed. Note: While the IRS has a policy of accepting returns by fax, it is limited to the return perfection process initiated by the IRS, where the IRS has made contact with the taxpayer. In those extremely rare situations where TAS would need to accept a return for processing because there isn’t time to get the document to the campus that same day, the return that TAS can accept must be an original, not a faxed copy. When feasible, upload copies of all returns; or when not practical to scan and store electronically (e.g., documents exceeding 100 pages, or, once scanned, exceed the file size limitations for emailing), make copies of all returns for the case file and document the actions taken in the TAMIS history. See IRM 13.1.11.2.1, Case Documentation. 13.1.18.8.4 (08-25-2021) TAS IDRS Marker Considerations Taxpayers with open TAS cases, both primary and secondary, are protected from IRS assignment to a Private Debt Collection (PDC) agency by a TAS IDRS marker, TC 971 AC 517. For taxpayers with multiple modules controlled by TAS, the TAS IDRS marker must be on at least one balance due module. If the TC 971 AC 517 with “TAS CASE OPEN” in the MISC field does not appear within 21 days of the TAS Received Date, input the missing indicator(s) on IDRS. Figure 13.1.18-1 Graphic shown is an IDRS screen print of the Command Code REQ77 response screen FRM77. On this response screen, the TAS employee has made the following entries: “971” on Line 2 positions 4-6, “517” on Line 8 positions 24-26, and “TAS CASE OPEN” on Line 12 positions 57-69. Please click here for the text description of the image. Caution: Only input the missing indicator on modules listed on TAMIS Taxpayer Screen 5. Otherwise, TAS’s batch process will not reverse the indicator when TAS closes its case. To help us improve this process, report the case number of all cases where the indicator failed to appear on IDRS to the *TAS TAG Policy and Guidance mailbox. 13.1.18.9 (08-25-2021) Making an IRC 7811 Significant Hardship Determination TAS is required to make a determination of significant hardship on all cases. This determination is referred to as an “IRC 7811, Significant Hardship Determination.” It is essential that TAS distinguish those taxpayers who need TAS assistance due to a significant hardship as defined by IRC 7811, from others who need TAS assistance but are not experiencing or about to experience a significant hardship as defined by IRC 7811. Taxpayers with a significant hardship may potentially need a TAO to obtain relief. By identifying a significant hardship situation, TAS is better prepared to offer these taxpayers the assistance they require, when they need it. IRC 7811 gives the National Taxpayer Advocate the authority to issue TAOs and that authority has been redelegated to Local Taxpayer Advocates. See IRM 1.2.2.12.1, Delegation Order 13-1 (Rev. 1). The purpose of making an IRC 7811 Significant Hardship Determination on every case is to ensure that TAOs are considered when: The actions required to offer relief to the taxpayer are not within TAS’s authority; An OD/Functional Unit disagrees with the actions recommended by TAS; or An OD/Functional Unit fails to perform the actions recommended by TAS. Note: The ability to provide relief or issue a TAO should not be a factor in determining if significant hardship exists. Generally, as defined in IRC 7811 and Treas. Reg. 301.7811–1(a)(4)(ii), before a TAO may be issued, TAS is required to make a determination regarding significant hardship. The term significant hardship means a serious privation caused or about to be caused to the taxpayer as a result of the particular manner in which the revenue laws are being administered by the IRS. Significant hardship includes situations in which a system or procedure fails to resolve the taxpayer’s problem or dispute with the IRS. A significant hardship also includes, but is not limited to: An immediate threat of adverse action. A delay of more than 30 days in resolving taxpayer account problems when: • A taxpayer does not receive a response by the date promised by the IRS; or • The IRS has established a normal processing time for taking an action and the taxpayer experiences a delay of more than 30 days beyond normal processing time. The incurring, by the taxpayer, of significant costs, (including fees for professional representation) if relief is not granted. Irreparable injury to, or a long-term adverse impact on, the taxpayer if relief is not granted. Examples of situations that involve significant hardships are: Lack of funds due to levy or refund not received for housing and utilities, food, transportation to and from work, or medical treatment. The taxpayer may become unemployed or lose his or her source of income as a result of the IRS’s action. The taxpayer will lose out on acquiring real property. The taxpayer’s rights have been abridged. The IRS handled the taxpayer’s case differently than other taxpayers in similar situations, and the impact will cause serious damage to the taxpayer’s ability to earn future income. The IRS did not respond to the taxpayer in a timely manner. The taxpayer’s credit was not applied in the correct manner or to the correct account. The taxpayer did not receive a statutory final notice before enforcement action was taken. The circumstances listed above are not meant to be an exhaustive list of what constitutes significant hardship to taxpayers. TAS must use common sense and good judgment when making an IRC § 7811 Significant Hardship Determination. Here are two examples to consider: Example: The taxpayer disagrees with a proposed tax assessment by the Automated Underreporter Unit (AUR). The taxpayer timely responds to the CP2000, Notice of Proposed Deficiency, and provides documentation to confirm that the wages on which the assessment was based do not belong to him. It has been four months and the taxpayer has not received a response. In this example, there is a significant hardship because there has been a delay of more than 30 days beyond the normal processing time in resolving the taxpayer’s problem. Example: Joint filers submit a Form 911 because they have a levy on their bank account. The taxpayers state they will not be able to buy food for their children unless the levy is released. During initial fact gathering and research you discover that the taxpayers owe federal income taxes for eight years and have failed to meet several payment deadlines which resulted in the levy. When determining if significant hardship exists, this prior history of failing to pay should not be considered. The taxpayers’ current situation should be the determining factor on whether significant hardship exists. In this example, there is a significant hardship because the levy is preventing the taxpayers from providing food to their family. It is important that you do not allow your personal values or opinions to affect the determination of the validity of the taxpayer’s hardship. The determination of significant hardship should be reached on the issue of hardship alone without considering: Who is “at fault” (who caused the hardship or contributed to the problem). Past actions and events (e.g., prior compliance history of the taxpayer). Type of tax (such as trust fund liabilities). Prospect of resolution (even if there is no prospect of relief or no reasonable alternative actions available). 13.1.18.9.1 (08-25-2021) When to Make an IRC 7811 Significant Hardship Determination TAS employees should make an IRC 7811, Significant Hardship Determination, as part of completing their initial actions, if they have enough information to do so. If they do not, the determination can be made at any point during the process of working a case. However, an IRC 7811, Significant Hardship Determination, must be made before certain case actions, as noted below, can be taken. TAS employees will consider all facts and circumstances of the case and use good judgment as to when to make this determination. Document the IRC 7811, Significant Hardship Determination, on TAMIS as soon as the determination is made that significant hardship does or does not exist. An IRC 7811, Significant Hardship Determination, must be made before an OAR can be issued. An IRC 7811, Significant Hardship Determination, must be made before a TAO can be issued. An IRC 7811, Significant Hardship Determination, must be made, or a previous determination re-examined, when the OD/Functional Unit disagrees with any of the actions recommended by TAS. An IRC 7811, Significant Hardship Determination, must be made and documented on TAMIS before the case can be closed, including cases being closed as no response. An IRC 7811, Significant Hardship Determination, must be made on reopened cases. 13.1.18.9.2 (08-25-2021) Documenting an IRC 7811 Significant Hardship Determination on TAMIS TAS employees will record their IRC 7811, Significant Hardship Determination, using the TAMIS Taxpayer Screen 3, 7811 Determination field. If a case involves a significant hardship, document this on the TAMIS Taxpayer Screen 3 and explain why a significant hardship exists. If a case does not involve a significant hardship, document this on the TAMIS Taxpayer Screen 3 and explain why significant hardship does not apply. Intake Advocates working a case to completion using the Quick Closure procedures are required to make an IRC 7811, determination of significant hardship. Intake Advocates will not be required to enter an “Explanation” on the Taxpayer Screen 3. Instead they will enter the literal “IA7811.” See IRM 13.1.16.16.2.1, Quick Closure Cases Worked by Intake Advocates. For those cases that are worked by a TAS employee other than an Intake Advocate, the TAS employee is required to complete the Explanation field as appropriate. 13.1.18.9.3 (08-25-2021) Changing an IRC 7811 Significant Hardship Determination Changes to an IRC 7811, Significant Hardship Determination, may be necessary when subsequent information received from taxpayers, third parties, or internal sources show that the taxpayer’s situation does, after all, involve a significant hardship, what the TAS employee initially considered to be a significant hardship is not, or new issues arise. Example: The taxpayer claims he made a payment he was not given credit for and he received notice of an IRS levy. The TAS employee sees no indication on IDRS of the IRS issuing a levy. The employee requests a copy of the levy notice from the taxpayer and sees that it is a notice of a levy filed by the State for the taxpayer’s unpaid State income taxes. TAS verifies with the taxpayer that the “missing” payment was submitted to the State. After explaining to the taxpayer that the problem involves the State and not the IRS, TAS will change the original IRC 7811, Significant Hardship Determination, of “yes” to “no.” See (2) below. Example: A local congressional staffer forwards a case to TAS to obtain transcripts for an elderly constituent. As the taxpayer has never contacted the IRS for these transcripts, this would not meet significant hardship. However, the TAS employee calls the taxpayer to inform her that the transcripts are on the way. The taxpayer advises TAS that she requested the transcripts after receiving notice from the IRS of their intent to file a Notice of Federal Tax Lien within 30 days. Since this is a threat of immediate adverse action, the TAS employee will change the original IRC 7811, Significant Hardship Determination, of “no” to “yes.” Note: If the taxpayer experienced a significant hardship at any time while the case was in TAS, even if other issues exist or later arise that do not involve significant hardship, the IRC 7811, Significant Hardship Determination, will always be “yes” and should not be changed. When an IRC 7811, Significant Hardship Determination, is changed from a “yes” to a “no”, the LTA must demonstrate concurrence with the change by activating the Radio Button on TAMIS screen 3. LTA concurrence is not required when changing an IRC 7811, Significant Hardship Determination, from a “No” to a “Yes.” Exhibit 13.1.18-1 Terms Term Definition Audit Reconsideration Process used by the IRS to help a taxpayer who disagrees with the results of an IRS audit of the taxpayer's tax return, or a return created for the taxpayer by the IRS under IRC 6020(b), when the taxpayer did not file a tax return. Estimated Completion Date (ECD) An estimated date for case resolution is communicated to the taxpayer or representative and documented in the TAMIS case history. Follow-up Date (FUD) A date used by TAS employees to manage the movement of a case toward resolution. A FUD is used to document when a TAS employee plans to take the next case action. Next Contact Date (NCD) A date given to the taxpayer or representative as to when the next contact will be made by the TAS employee. Offset Bypass Refund Issuance of a manual refund without first satisfying outstanding Federal tax liabilities. Operations Assistance Request Conveys a recommendation or request that the IRS act to resolve an issue when TAS lacks the statutory or delegated authority to resolve a taxpayer’s problem. Quick Closure Issues that are completely resolved by a TAS employee on the same day. Or issues that are completely resolved by a TAS employee on the same day which also require IDRS transaction monitoring before we can close the case. Receiving Office The office receiving a case that has been transferred by the TAS office where the case originated. Taxpayer Advocate Management Information System (TAMIS) TAS uses TAMIS to record, control, and process cases and to analyze the issues that bring taxpayers to TAS. Taxpayer Advocate Received Date The date TAS received the taxpayer's inquiry. Taxpayer Assistance Order A statutory tool used by TAS to order the IRS to take certain actions, cease certain actions, or refrain from taking certain actions. See IRC 7811. See also IRM 13.1.20, TAS Taxpayer Assistance Order (TAO) Process. The Right to Quality Service Taxpayers have the right to receive prompt, courteous, and professional assistance in their dealings with the IRS, to be spoken to in a way they can easily understand, to receive clear and easily understandable communications from the IRS, and to speak to a supervisor about inadequate service. The Right to Retain Representation Taxpayers have the right to retain an authorized representative of their choice to represent them in their dealings with the IRS. Taxpayers have the right to seek assistance from a Low Income Taxpayer Clinic if they cannot afford representation. The Right to Appeal an IRS Decision in an Independent Forum Taxpayers are entitled to a fair and impartial administrative appeal of most IRS decisions, including many penalties, and have the right to receive a written response regarding the Office of Appeals’ decision. Taxpayers generally have the right to take their cases to court. Exhibit 13.1.18-2 Acronyms Acronym Definition ASED Assessment Statute Expiration Date ACS Automated Collection System Adj or adjmt Adjustment AIMS Audit Information Management System ALS Automated Lien System AMS Account Management Services ANMF Automated Non-Master File AP Action Plan ATA Account Technical Advisor (formerly CTA) ATAO Application for Taxpayer Assistance Order AUR Automated Underreporter BMF Business Master File BFS Bureau of the Fiscal Service BOD Business Operation Division CA Case Advocate CABIC Case Assistance by Issue Code CADE Customer Account Data Engine CAP Collection Appeals Program CDP Collection Due Process CEAS Correspondence Examination Automation Support CIS Collection Information Statement or Correspondence Imaging System CRRG Campus Requirements and Routing Guide CSED Collection Statute Expiration Date DV Disclosure Verified ECD Estimated Completion Date EITC Earned Income Tax Credit EUP Employee User Portal FPLP Federal Payment Levy Program FUD Follow-up Date IA Intake Advocate IDRS Integrated Data Retrieval System IMF Individual Master File IRC Internal Revenue Code ITAP Internal Technical Advisor Program LITC Low Income Taxpayer Clinic LTA Local Taxpayer Advocate NCD Next Contact Date OAR Operations Assistance Request OBR Offset Bypass Refund OD Operating Division OPR Office of Professional Responsibility PFANBATGA Phone, fax, address, name given, badge (ID), apology, TAS Confidentiality, TAS statement of independence given, and TP authenticated. PII Personally Identifiable Information POA Power of Attorney QC Quick Closure; Problems completely resolved by TAS within 24 hours. RGS Report Generation Software RSED Refund Statute Expiration Date SCIC Secondary Core Issue Code SITLP State Income Tax Levy Program SLA Service Level Agreement TAMIS Taxpayer Advocate Management Information System TAO Taxpayer Assistance Order TARD Taxpayer Advocate Received Date TC or PC Telephone Call Third Party Entity that IRS must contact other than the taxpayer or his/her representative. Examples of third parties are banks, employers, etc. TIN Taxpayer Identification Number Exhibit 13.1.18-3 Related IRM Resources Resource Title IRM 1.2.2.12 Delegation of Authority for Taxpayer Advocate Service Activities IRM 3.17.79.3.3 Issuing Hardship Refunds IRM 5.19.1.2.2 Disclosure Overview, Verifying ID of Contact Party IRM 5.19.5.4.13 ACS and Disclosure IRM 10.5.7.7 Employee Identification Requirements IRM 11.3 Disclosure of Official Information IRM 13.1.2.5.2 Notification of a Third Party Contact IRM 13.1.5.6 Communicating Confidentiality Rules to Taxpayers and Taxpayers’ Representatives IRM 13.1.6.7 Leaving Messages on Answering Machines IRM 13.1.7 Taxpayer Advocate Service (TAS) Case Criteria IRM 13.1.10 Special Processes IRM 13.1.12 Technical Advisors and the Virtual Team Process IRM 13.1.16 Receipt and Assignment of TAS Cases IRM 13.1.19 Operations Assistance Request (OAR) Process IRM 13.1.20 TAS Taxpayer Assistance Order (TAO) Process IRM 13.1.21 Closing TAS Cases IRM 13.1.23 Taxpayer Representation IRM 13.1.24.4.1 Advocating for Taxpayers Claiming the Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC) IRM 13.4.5 Initiating and Working a Case on TAMIS IRM 21.1.1.4 Communication Skills IRM 21.1.3.2.3 Required Taxpayer Authentication IRM 21.1.3.2.4 Additional Taxpayer Authentication IRM 21.1.3.3 Third Party (POA/TIA/F706) Authentication IRM 21.3.7.5 Form 2848, Power of Attorney and Declaration of Representative and Form 8821, Taxpayer Information Authorization Overview IRM 21.4.6.5.11.1 Offset Bypass Refund (OBR) More Internal Revenue Manual