- 4.23.9 Employment Tax Penalty and Fraud Procedures
- 126.96.36.199 Overview
- 188.8.131.52 Introduction
- 184.108.40.206 Reasonable Cause
- 220.127.116.11 Managerial Approval
- 18.104.22.168.1 Computation of Penalty Included in Notice
- 22.214.171.124 Appeal Procedures
- 126.96.36.199 Employment Tax Fraud - General
- 188.8.131.52.1 First Indications of Fraud
- 184.108.40.206.2 Firm Indications of Fraud
- 220.127.116.11.3 Criminal Fraud Procedures - General
- 18.104.22.168.3.1 Criminal Fraud Referrals
- 22.214.171.124.3.1.1 Acceptance of Initial Criminal Fraud Referral
- 126.96.36.199.3.1.2 Referral to DOJ of Accepted Fraud Referral
- 188.8.131.52.3.1.3 Quarterly Conference of Criminal Referrals
- 184.108.40.206.3.1.4 Discontinuance of Accepted Fraud Referral
- 220.127.116.11.3.2 Declination of Initial Criminal Fraud Referral
- 18.104.22.168.4 Civil Fraud Procedures
- 22.214.171.124.5 Miscellaneous Fraud Procedures and Group Definitions
- 126.96.36.199 Negligence Penalty
- 188.8.131.52 Assertion of Penalties Involving IRC 3509
- 184.108.40.206 Assertion of Failure to File Penalty
- 220.127.116.11 Assertion of Failure to Pay Penalty
- 18.104.22.168 Penalty for Failure to Make Timely Deposits
- 22.214.171.124 First Time Abate (FTA) Waiver
- 126.96.36.199 Penalties for Failure to File Certain Information Returns or Furnish Certain Statements
- 188.8.131.52.1 Information Returns Regarding Payments of Remuneration for Services
- 184.108.40.206.2 Wage and Tax Statements
- 220.127.116.11.3 Penalty for Failure to File Correct Information Returns
- 18.104.22.168.4 Penalty for Failure to Furnish Correct Information Returns
- 22.214.171.124.5 Information Penalty Rates
- 126.96.36.199.6 Information Return Penalty Statute of Limitations
- 188.8.131.52.7 Q & A Regarding Failure to File or Furnish Penalties
- 184.108.40.206.8 Failure to Comply with Other Information Reporting Requirements
- 220.127.116.11 Trust Fund Recovery Penalty
- 18.104.22.168.1 Trust Fund Recovery Penalty Procedures
- 22.214.171.124.2 Instructions for Completing Form 6238, Referral Report for Potential Trust Fund Recovery Penalty Cases
- 126.96.36.199 Tax Return Preparer Penalty
- 188.8.131.52 Business Master File (BMF) Identity Theft Procedures - Overview
- 184.108.40.206.1 Procedures for BMF Identity Theft
- 220.127.116.11.2 Confirmed BMF Identity Theft Procedures on Non-filed Returns
- 18.104.22.168.3 Confirmed BMF Identity Theft Procedures for Filed Returns
- 22.214.171.124.4 Contact with True EIN Owner
- Exhibit 4.23.9-1 Instructions for Determining Civil Penalty Statute of Limitations
Part 4. Examining Process
Chapter 23. Employment Tax
Section 9. Employment Tax Penalty and Fraud Procedures
March 27, 2017
(1) This transmits revised IRM 4.23.9, renamed Employment Tax - Employment Tax Penalty, Fraud, and Identification Theft Procedures.
Updates are made to this section for procedural and technical changes.
(1) Editorial and technical changes have been made throughout this section.
(2) IRM 126.96.36.199(4). Added Office of Servicewide Penalties website.
(3) IRM 188.8.131.52(2). Added IRM references to penalty IRM for deficiency and non-deficiency assessments.
(4) IRM 184.108.40.206(3). Added Note that EO should forward the assessment/abatement action to the EO closing unit for input.
(5) IRM 220.127.116.11(4). Deleted references to joint returns, as this section discusses penalties for employment taxes.
(6) IRM 18.104.22.168(5). Added (5) for information on the Information Return Penalty Report Writing Program and cite for IRM 22.214.171.124.6, Examination Delinquent Information Return Procedures.
(7) IRM 126.96.36.199(2). Added requirement for the examiner to document the basis for relief and changed the IRM cite to IRM 188.8.131.52.5.2.
(8) IRM 184.108.40.206(3). Added (3) that examiners must consider granting the first time abatement (FTA) waiver before addressing reasonable cause.
(9) IRM 220.127.116.11(1). Added additional information on managerial approval.
(10) IRM 18.104.22.168(2). Removed the incorrect rationale for not treating IRC 6651(f) as included in the exception for managerial approval. Cite provided to IRM 22.214.171.124.7.5.1.
(11) IRM 126.96.36.199. Renamed Employment Tax Fraud - General. Serves as the introduction to employment tax fraud. Entire subsection rewritten and reordered for better flow.
(12) IRM 188.8.131.52(1). Replaced "deficiency" with "employment tax liability."
(13) IRM 184.108.40.206.1. Rewritten for clarity. Added a Note that the FTA should be notified if a decision is made to return the case to status code 12.
(14) IRM 220.127.116.11.2. Rewritten for clarity.
(15) IRM 18.104.22.168.3. Renamed Criminal Fraud Procedures - General. Deleted paragraph addressing Trust Fund Recovery Penalty, as it is addressed in IRM 22.214.171.124.
(16) IRM 126.96.36.199.3.1. New subsection, Criminal Fraud Referrals. Formerly IRM 188.8.131.52.5.
(17) IRM 184.108.40.206.3.1.1. New subsection, Acceptance of Initial Criminal Fraud Referral.
(18) IRM 220.127.116.11.3.1.2. New subsection, Referral to DOJ of Accepted Fraud Referrals.
(19) IRM 18.104.22.168.3.1.3. New subsection, Quarterly Conference of Criminal Referrals.
(20) IRM 22.214.171.124.3.1.4. New subsection, Discontinuance of Accepted Fraud Referral.
(21) IRM 126.96.36.199.3.2. New subsection, Declination of Initial Criminal Fraud Referral.
(22) IRM 188.8.131.52.4. Formerly IRM 184.108.40.206.7. Rewritten to provide updated procedures.
(23) IRM 220.127.116.11.4.1. Formerly IRM 18.104.22.168.6.
(24) IRM 22.214.171.124.4.2. Formerly IRM 126.96.36.199.7.2. Renamed Civil Resolution of a Criminal Prosecution Case to be more consistent with recent changes to IRM 25.1 and IRM 4.8.
(25) IRM 188.8.131.52.5. New subsection, Miscellaneous Fraud Procedures and Group Definitions, combining various items for deleted sections into one procedural section.
(26) IRM 184.108.40.206.7. Deleted and incorporated into IRM 220.127.116.11.4.
(27) IRM 18.104.22.168.7.1. Deleted and incorporated into IRM 22.214.171.124.4.1.
(28) IRM 126.96.36.199.7.2. Deleted and incorporated into IRM 188.8.131.52.4.2.
(29) IRM 184.108.40.206.7.3. Deleted and incorporated into IRM 220.127.116.11.4.
(30) IRM 18.104.22.168. Removed reference to obsolete Form 9231. Removed including the reviewer in a decision on the application of a negligence penalty.
(31) IRM 22.214.171.124(5). Deleted as superfluous.
(32) IRM 126.96.36.199(1). Corrected cite to revised IRM 188.8.131.52.8.
(33) IRM 184.108.40.206(4) and (5). New paragraphs and examples provided. Note added on computational adjustments.
(34) IRM 220.127.116.11(8). New paragraph on IRC 6651(h) reduced one-quarter percent penalty rate.
(35) IRM 18.104.22.168. New subsection, First Time Abate (FTA) Waiver, describing field examination procedures for FTA.
(36) IRM 22.214.171.124. Formerly IRM 126.96.36.199. Renumbered IRM 188.8.131.52 and following subsections.
(37) IRM 184.108.40.206.1. Formerly IRM 220.127.116.11.1.
(38) IRM 18.104.22.168.2. Formerly IRM 22.214.171.124.2. (3) revised to reflect updated W-2 return filing procedures and dates.
(39) IRM 126.96.36.199.3. Formerly IRM 188.8.131.52.3. Title changed to Penalty for Failure to File Correct Information Returns. Revised wording and ordering of paragraphs. Updated to reflect current law.
(40) IRM 184.108.40.206.4. Formerly IRM 220.127.116.11.4. Title changed to Penalty for Failure to Furnish Correct Information Returns. Revised wording and ordering of paragraphs. Updated to reflect current law.
(41) IRM 18.104.22.168.5. Formerly IRM 22.214.171.124.5. Updated to reflect current law. Eliminated penalty rate tables. Cross-references provided to the four penalty table Exhibits in IRM 20.1.7, Penalty Handbook, Information Return Penalties.
(42) IRM 126.96.36.199.6. New subsection, Information Return Penalty Statute of Limitations, discusses the statute date determination of information returns.
(43) IRM 188.8.131.52.7. Formerly IRM 184.108.40.206. Question and Answer 5 updated to reflect new due dates for W-2 returns, along with corrected filing instructions and use of the tickler file.
(44) IRM 220.127.116.11.8. Formerly IRM 18.104.22.168. Title changed to Failure to Comply with Other Information Reporting Requirements. Added paragraph on effects of IRC 6721 and IRC 6722 imposition.
(45) IRM 22.214.171.124. Formerly IRM 126.96.36.199. Renumbered IRM 188.8.131.52 and following subsections.
(46) IRM 184.108.40.206(4). New paragraph describing the statutory period for assessment of a Trust Fund Recovery Penalty.
(47) IRM 220.127.116.11.1. Formerly IRM 18.104.22.168.1. "Area Office Technical Support Function (TSf)" changed to "Collection Advisory" and deleted the 30 to 60 day advisory period.
(48) IRM 22.214.171.124.2. Formerly IRM 126.96.36.199.2. "Area Office Technical Support Function (TSf)" changed to "Collection function group manager assigned to the taxpayer's zip code" . Updated instructions for Form 6238 and included procedure for appealed cases.
(49) IRM 188.8.131.52. Former IRM 184.108.40.206.
(50) IRM 220.127.116.11. New subsection, Business Master File (BMF) Identity Theft Procedures - Overview.
(51) IRM 18.104.22.168.1. New subsection, Procedures for BMF Identity Theft.
(52) IRM 22.214.171.124.2. New subsection, Confirmed BMF Identity Theft Procedures on Non-filed Returns.
(53) IRM 126.96.36.199.3. New subsection, Confirmed BMF Identity Theft Procedures for Filed Returns
(54) IRM 188.8.131.52.4. New subsection, Contact with True EIN Owner.
(55) Exhibit 4.23.9-1. Added IRC 6694(b).
Director, Examination - Specialty Policy
Small Business/Self-Employed Division
This section explains employment tax penalty procedures.
It is important that taxpayers be treated equitably and that decisions regarding liability for penalties be based on sound analyses of the reasons advanced by the taxpayer for failing to act.
In accordance with Policy Statement 20-1, "Penalties are used to enhance voluntary compliance," the IRS administers a penalty system that is designed to:
Ensure accuracy of results in light of the facts and the law,
Provide methods for the taxpayer to have his or her concerns heard and considered,
Require impartiality and a commitment to achieving the correct decision,
Allow for prompt reversal of initial determinations when sufficient information has been presented to indicate that the penalty is not appropriate, and
Ensure that penalties are used for their proper purpose and not as bargaining points in developing or processing cases.
See IRM 184.108.40.206.1, Policy Statements for Penalties and Interest Activities
To ensure consistency, the Service uses a single set of guidelines for all operational and processing functions contained in the IRM subsections of IRM 20.1, Penalty Handbook. The Office of Servicewide Penalties website is an excellent supplemental resource for guidance on all penalties - see https://organization.ds.irsnet.gov/sites/SbKM/Penalties/SitePages/Home.aspx.
IRM 25.1.1, Fraud Handbook - Overview/Definitions, and IRM 25.1.2, Fraud Handbook - Recognizing and Developing Fraud, provide specific guidance on fraud indicators and the development of fraud cases.
This section discusses the penalties most frequently asserted in employment tax examinations. The penalties covered in this section should not be considered as all inclusive and research should be done on a case-by-case basis to ensure correct penalty assessment. Examiners should refer to the various subsections of IRM 20.1, Penalty Handbook, for complete information on penalties. For instructions on determining the statute of limitations on assessment for certain civil penalties, see Exhibit 4.23.9-1, Instructions for Determining Civil Penalty Statute of Limitations.
Penalties are asserted in the same manner as the taxes to which they are applied. Employment taxes can be both subject to deficiency procedures (i.e., IRC 7436 ) and non-deficiency procedures. Further information on penalty assessments can be found at:
IRM 220.127.116.11.2, Deficiency Procedures and
IRM 18.104.22.168.2.1, Non-Deficiency Procedures
A Civil Penalties Master File has been developed to accommodate most penalties previously assessed on the Non-Master File (NMF) and the W–4 penalty. These penalties are listed on Form 8278, Assessment and Abatement of Miscellaneous Civil Penalties, which is used to forward the assessment/abatement action to Centralized Case Processing (CCP) for input. See IRM 20.1.1, Penalty Handbook - Introduction and Penalty Relief.
When using the Civil Penalties Master File, the first assessment made on an entity will establish the module, since there is no return filing to create the module prior to the first assessment. These MFTs will be single entity modules.
The Information Return Penalty Report Writing Program is available at: http://mysbse.web.irs.gov/ExamKM/et/examreturns/reportwriting/default.aspx.
Reasonable cause is based on all the facts and circumstances in each situation and allows the IRS to provide relief from a penalty that would otherwise be assessed. Reasonable cause relief is generally granted when the taxpayer exercised ordinary business care and prudence in determining their tax obligations, but nevertheless failed to comply with those obligations.
If it is determined that the failure to act was due to reasonable cause, a written statement setting forth the reason should be obtained from the taxpayer. The examiner will document the decision and the basis for providing relief according to functional guidelines. The examiner will attach a copy of the information to the original return (if available) or other transaction (input) document. See IRM 22.214.171.124.5.2, Taxpayer Entitled to Relief, for additional information.
Examiners must consider granting the first time abatement (FTA) waiver before addressing reasonable cause in cases involving:
Failure to File (IRC 6651(a)(1), IRC 6698(a)(1), and IRC 6699(a)(1)),
Failure to Pay (IRC 6651(a)(2) and IRC 6651(a)(3)), and/or
Failure to Deposit (IRC 6656) penalties.
See IRM 126.96.36.199, First Time Abate (FTA).
IRC 6751(b) requires that penalty assessments have the written approval of the examiner's immediate supervisor. The manager must perform a meaningful review of the employee's penalty determination prior to assessment. See IRM 188.8.131.52.3.1, Examination Change Reports Assessing Penalties. The IRS also requires managerial review on the non-assertion of penalties when there is a substantial understatement of tax under IRC 6662(d). See IRM 184.108.40.206.6 (3), Managerial Approval of Penalties. The examiner is not required to provide a copy of the written approval to the taxpayer; however, the IRS may wish to provide the taxpayer with a courtesy copy of the document showing that the manager approved the penalties. Taxpayers are entitled to request these documents under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). See IRM 220.127.116.11.3, Managerial Approval for Penalty Assessments.
Penalties under IRC 6651 for failure to file tax return or to pay tax and penalties automatically calculated through electronic means are excepted from the approval requirement. This means that the penalty must be free of any independent determination by a Service employee as to whether or not the penalty should be imposed against a taxpayer. Despite the fact that IRC 6651 penalties are exempted by statute from the managerial approval requirement, the fraudulent failure to file penalty requires approval from both Counsel and the manager. See IRM 18.104.22.168.7.5.1, FFTF Penalty Assessment—Procedural Requirements, paragraph (2) and (8).
IRC 6751(a) requires that each penalty notice include the name of the penalty, the code section imposing the penalty, and a computation of the penalty. The computation must include:
The formula for computing the penalty,
The amount of each of the variables in that formula,
The change in each of these variables since the date of the last notice, and
The bottom line amount of the penalty imposed.
The penalties shown on the separate explanation sheet must agree with the penalty amounts shown on all employment tax reports issued to the taxpayer. Examples include:
Form 2504, Agreement to Assessment and Collection of Additional Tax and Acceptance of Overassessment
Form 2504-S, Agreement to Assessment and Collection of Additional Tax and Acceptance of Overassessment (including section 530 statement)
Form 2504-WC, Agreement to Assessment and Collection of Additional Employment Tax and Acceptance of Overassessment in Worker Classification Cases
Form 4666, Summary of Employment Tax Examination
A notice of penalty for purposes of IRC 6751(a) is any notice on which the Service asserts a penalty. Examples include:
Revenue agent's report (RAR)
Notice of Determination of Worker Classification (NDWC)
Notice and demand
Billing notice mailed subsequent to the notice and demand
The appeal procedures with respect to employment taxes are applicable to unagreed delinquency and other penalties proposed by an examiner. This is true where penalties are in connection with unagreed adjustments to tax, as well as where penalties are the only items at issue.
The appropriate standard preliminary 30-day letters identified in IRM 22.214.171.124, 30–Day Letters, will be used in all unagreed penalty cases.
Fraud is deception by misrepresentation of material facts, or silence when good faith requires expression, which results in material damage to one who relies on it and has the right to rely on it. Simply stated, it is obtaining something of value from someone else through deceit. See IRM 126.96.36.199, Definition of Fraud.
Fraud requires both an underpayment of tax and affirmative acts by the taxpayer that demonstrates gross disregard of employment tax laws. To sustain a charge of fraud in a tax case successfully, it is necessary to:
Establish an understatement of tax,
Establish that all or part of the employment tax liability is due to a false, material representation of facts by the taxpayer,
Show that the taxpayer had knowledge of the false representations made, and
Show that the taxpayer intended those false representations to be acted upon or accepted as the truth.
First indications of fraud serve as a sign that a taxpayer may have taken actions for the purpose(s) of deceit, subterfuge, camouflage, concealment, attempting to color or obscure events, or to make things seem other than they are. First indications alone do not establish fraud.
First indications of fraud, also known as "badges of fraud," are mere suspicions of fraud. When discrepancies are identified, examiners must ask the taxpayer, the preparer, the representative, or any other involved party for explanations to resolve them. Questions should also be asked to determine the taxpayer’s intent. Examples of fraud indicators can be found in IRM 188.8.131.52, Indicators of Fraud.
At the first indication of possible fraud, the examiner should review IRM 25.1.1, Fraud Handbook - Overview/Definitions. Investigative techniques can be found in IRM 184.108.40.206, Investigative Techniques.
The examiner will use their judgment to determine audit techniques necessary to help resolve the badges of fraud. To be effective, examination techniques should be designed to disclose not only errors in accounting and application of law, but also irregularities, such as backdated or forged documents. It is not suggested that fraud exists in every assigned return or case, but examiners must be cognizant of the badges of fraud and address them in cases where they do exist.
The examiner will document the first indications of fraud in the workpapers and discuss the case with their manager. If the manager concurs that there is a possibility of fraud, a conference (either in person or over the phone) will be held between the examiner, the group manager, and the Fraud Technical Advisor (FTA).
The FTA serves as a resource person for compliance employees to assist in fraud investigations and offer advice on matters concerning tax fraud in all the business organizations.
When the examiner, the examiner’s manager, and the FTA agree that there is a potential for fraud, the case controls should be updated to Status Code (SC) "17" (fraud development). This decision must be documented in the case file. Form 11661, Fraud Development Recommendation - Examination, is used to document FTA involvement as well as the decision to update the case to SC "17" . See IRM 220.127.116.11.3, Penalty Referral.
A plan of action should be developed to establish and document the affirmative acts or firm indications of fraud. Refer to IRM 18.104.22.168, Overview, for information on the minimum plan for case development. The examiner should continue the audit being alert for other badges of fraud and follow up on initial suspicions of fraud. See IRM 22.214.171.124.1, Indications of Fraud, for a list of common badges of fraud.
Firm indications of fraud, or affirmative acts, establish that a taxpayer deliberately took actions with the purpose of deceit, subterfuge, camouflage, concealment, attempting to color or obscure events, or to make things seem other than what they are.
Fraud may exist where a taxpayer willfully attempts to underreport taxes, or does not pay taxes. For a taxpayer to be guilty of a crime in which willfulness is an element, that individual must have acted deliberately, knowingly, and with the specific intent to violate the law.
A "firm indication" of fraud must be distinguished from a "first indication" of fraud. A firm indication of fraud is a factual determination that can only be made on a case-by-case basis. Discussions with the group manager and the FTA will help the examiner determine when they have firm indications of fraud warranting development for a civil fraud penalty or a referral to Criminal Investigation (CI) for criminal fraud development. However, under no circumstances shall examiners or managers obtain advice and/or direction from CI for a specific case that is under examination. In addition, if a referral is being considered, an examiner should not solicit an agreement or solicit and receive delinquent returns prior to the submission of a fraud referral.
When the group manager, FTA, and examiner agree firm indications of fraud are present, a decision must be made regarding whether the case will be referred for criminal prosecution or will be developed for the assertion of the civil fraud penalty. Until this decision is made, the examination should immediately be suspended without disclosing to the taxpayer the reason for such suspension. Examiners are cautioned not to carry the investigation beyond the point where a valid indication of fraud is adequately supported by the workpapers.
If the case does not meet the guidelines for a criminal referral, the examiner will document the reasons in the case file and proceed with development of the case and the civil fraud penalty. The examiner will continue to work with the FTA to ensure complete development of the facts to support assertion of the civil fraud penalty. See IRM 126.96.36.199.3.
If the case warrants a criminal referral, the examiner will prepare Form 2797, Referral Report of Potential Criminal Fraud Cases. See IRM 188.8.131.52.3.1
Information about the source or details of evidence relating to a potential criminal case must be safeguarded and withheld to the extent necessary to avoid prejudice to a case. This general rule is applicable not only during the investigation of a case, but also in any action taken with respect to the civil portions of a case having open criminal aspects. When appropriate, examiners are expected to coordinate proposed disclosure of information through established channels.
The following code sections are the most common used by employment tax examiners when developing criminal fraud cases:
IRC 7202, Willful failure to collect or pay over taxes
IRC 7203, Willful failure to file return, supply information, or pay tax
IRC 7206, Fraud and false statements
IRC 7212, Attempts to interfere with administration of internal revenue laws
IRC 7512, Separate accounting for certain collected taxes, etc
IRC 7215, Offenses with respect to collected taxes (Failure to collect and deposit in a special trust fund account) (IRC 7215 and IRC 7512(b))
Full cooperation among all levels of operations in the IRS must be maintained to ensure that there is neither duplication in investigations nor unnecessary inconvenience to the public. The examiner will review IDRS to determine if any "-Z" freeze (Transaction Code (TC) 914) conditions exist and if other functions are assigned to the taxpayer case. CI or the FTA should be contacted prior to beginning case action whenever an un-reversed TC 914 (or other CI code) is present in any module.
If an examiner learns that an assigned case involves a taxpayer who is the subject of a criminal investigation, all activity on the case will be immediately suspended. The examiner’s manager will consult with the Supervisory Special Agent in CI relative to the continuance of employment tax activity on the case. If agreement to either continue the suspension or to resume the employment tax activity on the case cannot be reached at the group or territory level, the issue will be decided at the area level. Where more than one area is involved, the Director of Field Operations having jurisdiction over the criminal investigation will resolve the question.
In income, estate, and gift tax cases in which criminal prosecution has been recommended (except potential jeopardy cases), the Service generally does not authorize assessment of additional taxes and penalties during the time the recommendation for criminal prosecution is under consideration or during the period such cases may be awaiting trial or pending an appeal. The same procedure will be followed with respect to employment tax cases in which criminal prosecution has been recommended.
Threat of criminal prosecution shall never be made in any case. If a question concerning civil action arises in a case with open criminal aspects, it will be resolved on the basis of whether the criminal case will be prejudiced by the proposed civil action. IRM 184.108.40.206.11, Policy Statement 4-26 (Formerly P-4-84), "Criminal and civil aspects in enforcement," provides that the consequences of civil enforcement actions on criminal investigations for the same taxable periods and same types of taxes must be carefully weighed. Any discussion or negotiation regarding settlement of civil enforcement actions must be guided by this policy and input from the FTA.
Cases are referred to CI by using Form 2797, Referral Report of Potential Criminal Fraud Cases. The FTA is available to assist the examiner with the preparation of the referral. See IRM 25.1.3, Fraud Handbook - Criminal Referrals, for additional instructions.
Forward the referral through the referring examiner's manager to the FTA for approval by the FTA manager. From there, the referral is sent to CI for approval by the CI Special Agent in Charge (SAC) and the Supervisory Special Agent (SSA) before assignment to a Special Agent (SA).
The referral should be a detailed, factual presentation of the factors that establish firm indications of fraud. To assist in determining intent and the estimated criminal tax liability, the referral should include, but not be limited to:
Description of the affirmative act(s) of fraud, and
The taxpayer’s explanation of the affirmative act(s).
Because the referral is made electronically, any additional pages or attachments must be in electronic format. All other items, such as financial statements, public records checks, account transcripts, or a copy of the last filed return may be shared with CI at the ten-day conference. No workpapers or attachments are required with the referral.
If the examiner discovers indications of fraud but all detailed information is not available, the examiner will work with the FTA to complete Form 2797 to the extent possible.
Form 2797 should be prepared for the principal individual or legal entity involved in the suspected fraudulent activity. Only one Form 2797 is needed, even if the suspected fraudulent activity involves multiple entities; the related entities should be identified and discussed in the body of the referral. After concurrence and signature by the manager, the referral will be transmitted to the FTA. The FTA will review the Form 2797 and forward it to their manager for approval. After the Form 2797 is approved by the FTAs manager, the referral will be sent to CI for approval by the CI Special Agent in Charge and the SSA before assignment to a SA.
The SA will contact the examiner to set up an initial meeting within ten business days of receipt, at which time any additional information can be provided to the SA. A second meeting will take place to discuss whether or not the referral will be accepted by CI within 30 business days of receipt of Form 2797.
Supporting documents and a copy of each referral will be retained in the examiner's case file and will not be transmitted with the Form 2797 referral. See IRM 220.127.116.11, Preparation of Form 2797, for further instructions.
If a case involving a collateral examination results in a fraud referral, the affected territories will coordinate the referrals.
If CI accepts the referral, they will finish completing the examiner’s original Form 2797 and return it to the FTA. The FTA will retain a copy and forward the original to the referring examiner. In most cases, the referring examiner will become the cooperating agent on the case. The examiner will update the case to SC "18" (Accepted by CI) and maintain controls and responsibilities of the civil case.
The accepted fraud case can be resolved by CI in two ways:
CI refers the case to Department of Justice (DOJ). See IRM 18.104.22.168.3.1.2.
CI determines to not pursue criminal prosecution, discontinues their involvement, and returns the case to the examiner for civil settlement. IRM 22.214.171.124.3.1.4.
The procedures the examiner follows is dependent upon the case resolution by CI.
When CI refers a case to DOJ, they will prepare a Notice of Department of Justice Referral memorandum. This memorandum identifies the type of referral made and determines the type of suspense in Technical Services. Upon receipt of the Notice of Department of Justice Referral, the examiner will prepare the case for transfer to Technical Services for suspense. If CI:
Refers the case for "prosecution recommendation," it is an "administrative fraud suspense case" and the examiner will follow procedures in IRM 126.96.36.199.11, Fraud Suspense.
Refers the case for "further investigation," it is a "grand jury suspense case" and the examiner will follow procedures in IRM 188.8.131.52, Grand Jury Suspense, and IRM 184.108.40.206.11, to the extent applicable.
The Notice of Department of Justice Referral remains in the case file and provides support for the examiner’s decision to send the case to Technical Services. The examiner will update the case to SC "21" and route the case to their local Technical Services, which will maintain controls until criminal investigation/prosecution is concluded. Upon completion, Technical Services will return the case to the group for civil resolution. See IRM 220.127.116.11.4.2.
Quarterly four-way conferences between the examiner, group manager, SA, and SSA are required on all criminal fraud referral cases regardless of whether or not the examiner is cooperating with CI on the case development. See (5) in IRC 18.104.22.168, Accepted Criminal Referrals. The FTA may be included in these conferences. The quarterly conferences apply to both types of cases, administrative and grand jury. See IRM 22.214.171.124.3 , Required Communications, and IRM 126.96.36.199, Cooperating Grand Jury Examiner/Revenue Officer Procedures. These mandatory quarterly conferences continue while the case is in suspense in Technical Services; however Technical Services is not a party to these conferences.
CI will notify the examiner and manager if the case no longer has criminal potential. The notification will include Form 13308 , Criminal Investigation Closing Report. If in Fraud or Grand Jury Suspense, the civil case will be returned from Technical Services. The examiner will discuss the case with the FTA and manager to determine if the civil fraud penalty will be pursued. See IRM 188.8.131.52.4.2. The examiner will update the case to the appropriate status code "17" or "12" and continue with development of the civil case.
The Form 2797 and a memorandum of declination will be provided to the examiner either before the ten-day meeting or at/after the 30-day meeting if the referral is declined. This memorandum will remain in the case file. See IRM 184.108.40.206, Declined Criminal Referrals. The examiner will discuss the case with the FTA and the group manager to determine if civil fraud development will continue. Either the case will remain in SC "17" (civil fraud development) or the examiner will update the case back to SC "12" . In either situation, if the examiner discovers new badges of fraud, they will discuss with the FTA to determine whether to submit a new referral to CI.
An assertion of the civil fraud penalty may be made on the development of facts and circumstances of a civil examination or result from a completed criminal prosecution (case returned for civil resolution). See IRM 220.127.116.11.4.2 for additional procedures.
Assertion of the civil fraud penalty on a case does not require a referral to CI. Determination of the civil fraud penalty is the shared responsibility of the examiner, the group manager, and the FTA. See IRM 18.104.22.168, Procedures. If the case involves issues requiring the issuance of a Notice of Determination of Worker Classification (NDWC) under IRC 7436, Area Counsel must approve the civil fraud penalties prior to issuance. The examiner should coordinate with Counsel to ensure their concurrence prior to submitting the case to Technical Services for the issuance of the NDWC.
Recommendations for imposing the civil fraud penalty must receive careful scrutiny to make certain that such penalties are asserted only in appropriate cases. The Service bears the burden of proving civil fraud by clear and convincing evidence in Tax Court. See IRC 7454, Burden of proof in fraud, foundation manager, and transferee Cases.
The following code sections are the most common used by employment tax examiners when developing civil fraud cases:
IRC 6663, Imposition of fraud penalty (civil fraud)
IRC 6651, Failure to file tax return or to pay tax (6651(f), Increase in penalty for fraudulent failure to file)
IRM 25.1.1, Fraud Handbook - Overview/Definitions, notes several elements that may be indicative of fraud. Examiners should remain continually alert for these and other "badges of fraud."
When the group manager, FTA, and examiner agree to pursue the civil fraud penalty on a civil examination, the case will remain in SC "17" . If a decision is made that civil fraud is no longer applicable, the examiner will document this decision in the case file, update the case to SC "12" , and complete the examination.
The final examination report will reflect the civil fraud penalties applied to the appropriate adjustments. See IRM 22.214.171.124.4.1.
Cases returned from CI after criminal prosecution or discontinuance of the criminal investigation will be completed as a civil resolution by the referring examiner. See IRM 126.96.36.199.4.2. However, if the examiner participated in the grand jury investigation and had access to grand jury information, the case cannot be assigned to the cooperating examiner. See IRM 188.8.131.52 , Civil Case Resolution.
IRC 6663(a) provides that if any part of the underpayment of tax required to be shown on the return is due to fraud, a penalty equal to 75 percent of the portion of the underpayment which is attributable to fraud will be added.
IRC 6663(b) further provides that if the IRS establishes that any portion of the underpayment is attributable to fraud, the entire underpayment shall be treated as attributable to fraud. However, if the taxpayer establishes by a preponderance of evidence that any portion of the underpayment is not attributable to fraud, such portion will be excepted from the fraud penalty.
IRC 6664(b) provides that the penalty applies only when a return has been filed by the taxpayer.
IRM 184.108.40.206.2, Penalty Assertion, provides current rates and specific procedures for assertion of the civil fraud penalty under IRC 6663. See IRM 220.127.116.11 for the fraudulent failure to file penalty. See also IRM 18.104.22.168.7.5, Fraudulent Failure to File - IRC 6651(f).
For civil resolution of a criminal prosecution case, the examiner should contact CI to ascertain which criminal statutes the taxpayer was convicted of before attempting to resolve the related civil fraud penalty and/or the fraudulent failure-to-file penalty. The examiner should obtain a copy of the plea agreement or judgment notating the applicable criminal statutes and years. The examiner will discuss the case with the group manager, FTA, and Counsel to determine if the facts in the case file will support assertion of the fraud penalty. The plea agreement or judgment will be used to support the determination regarding application of the civil fraud penalty and years to which it will apply.
The case will be updated to SC "17" when the case is returned for civil resolution. The case will be updated to SC "12" if the decision is made not to pursue these penalties. Form 3999, Statute Expiration Report, must be prepared in a barred statute situation due to the determination not to pursue the civil fraud penalty. Refer to IRM 22.214.171.124 , Statute Expiration Reports.
Refer to IRM 126.96.36.199, Procedures, specifically paragraphs (7) through (12), for additional requirements on the civil resolution after the prosecution.
Examiners and managers should be aware of collateral estoppel and the important distinction it can have in civil tax fraud penalty cases. Collateral estoppel is a legal doctrine that prevents a taxpayer, who has been previously convicted of criminal tax evasion under IRC 7201, from asserting a defense to the civil fraud penalty. Refer to IRC 188.8.131.52, Collateral Estoppel, for additional information.
For civil resolution of a criminal prosecution case, the examiner should calculate the proper amount of employment taxes, penalties, and additions to tax separate and distinct from the calculated amounts at issue in the criminal prosecution case or payable as restitution in the criminal prosecution case.
Unagreed cases where the fraud penalty or fraudulent failure to file penalty are asserted, or cases that have an AIMS freeze code "P" , should be closed to Technical Services for review. TE/GE should send cases to their review function.
Update the case to SC "17" after the determination is made that the case will be developed for either the civil fraud penalty or for potential criminal referral to CI. If the civil fraud penalty is not pursued, the case will be returned to SC "12" for the completion of the examination.
Update the case to SC "18" when a case is accepted by CI after a criminal fraud referral is made. The accepted criminal referral case will remain in SC "18" until the criminal investigation is concluded or until the case is referred to DOJ.
While in SC "17" or SC "18" , cycle time will be excluded from monthly "aging" reports to management (Month-At-a-Glance Report). As AIMS and ERCS include data from all cases, a manual reconciliation to the Month-At-a-Glance Report will exclude SC "17" and "18" cases from both the overage category and the overage percentage.
When closing a civil fraud case, the examiner will enter:
"C" if the 75 percent fraud penalty was asserted,
"F" if criminal prosecution has been successfully concluded, or
"B" if both apply,
on the appropriate line of Form 5344, Examination Closing Record, or Form 5599, TE/GE Examined Closing Record, to ensure capture of the penalty on AIMS. Form 3198 (Form 3198-A for EO) is used to capture fraud penalty amounts on ERCS. Examiners must enter the actual penalty amount, in whole dollars, and the corresponding penalty code section, e.g., "IRC 6663" .
Examiners will recommend the assertion of the accuracy-related penalty for negligence or disregard of rules or regulations under IRC 6662 where appropriate. However, the accuracy-related and civil fraud penalties cannot be asserted on the same portion of the same underpayment, except as an alternative position. Refer to (6) of IRM 184.108.40.206, Common Features of Accuracy-Related and Civil Fraud Penalties.
Negligence, in the generally accepted legal sense, is the omission to do something which a reasonable person guided by those considerations which ordinarily regulate the conduct of human affairs would do, or doing something which a prudent and reasonable person would not do. Negligence includes any failure to:
Make a reasonable attempt to comply with the provisions of tax laws,
Exercise ordinary and reasonable care in tax return preparation, or
Keep adequate books and records.
The term "disregard" includes careless, reckless, or intentional disregard. The determination that negligence applies in any employment tax case is a combined judgment by the examiner and supervisor.
Examiners will consider the accuracy-related penalty if there has been negligence or an intentional disregard of published rulings and regulations in the preparation of returns, as distinguished from a mere error or a difference of opinion on a controversial question where a willful intent to evade is not present or cannot be substantiated.
IRM 20.1.5, Return Related Penalties, provides pertinent information on the negligence penalty, including describing coordination between the negligence penalty and other penalties. See IRM 220.127.116.11.1, Negligence.
When an underpayment of tax is attributable to the taxpayer’s failure to keep adequate records, the negligence penalty may be asserted if the taxpayer’s records are found to be inadequate upon the initial examination or any subsequent examination. Assertion of the penalty is determined based on the facts and circumstances of the particular case.
Preparation of the return by an agent or employee of the taxpayer does not preclude the application of the penalty. Unlike the fraud penalty, the taxpayer bears the same burden of proof in a negligence case as in an employment tax liability or over-assessment case. IRC 7491(c), however, provides that the Commissioner has the burden of production in any court proceeding with respect to the liability of any individual for any penalty, addition to tax, or additional amount (penalties). For the Commissioner to meet this burden of production under IRC 7491(c), the Commissioner must come forward with sufficient evidence indicating that it is appropriate to impose the relevant penalty.
If an examiner recommends an accuracy-related penalty, the facts forming the basis for the recommendation will be stated in a written explanation of adjustment and enclosed with a copy of the examination report.
Unlike the fraud penalty, liability for an accuracy-related penalty does not remove the bar of the statute of limitations on assessment. However, if the Service determines fraud exists, there is no bar to the statute of limitations on assessment for the entire underpayment, including that portion not attributable to fraud.
Examiners will attach Form 3198, Special Handling Notice, or Form 3198-A, TE/GE Special Handling Notice, to all case files in which the IRC 6662 penalty is to be assessed. Under Special Handling "Other," annotate "Penalty computation required under IRC section 6662."
IRC 3509 provides reduced rates for computing the withholding tax under IRC 3402 and the employee's share of FICA tax under IRC 3101, (including Additional Medicare Tax under IRC 3101(b)(2)). This substitute method applies if the employer failed to deduct and withhold those taxes by reason of treating the employee as a non-employee. When IRC 3509 applies, the Service cannot compute the applicable penalties on the basis of the higher liability that would have resulted under IRC sections 3402 and 3101.
In computing the failure to deposit taxes penalty under IRC 6656, the computation should be based only on the employer’s share of the FICA tax liability determined by IRC 3509. See IRM 18.104.22.168.1, Reduced Tax Rates Under IRC 3509, for more information.
IRC 3509 does not apply to an erroneous classification of "wages" under IRC 3121(a), or to an error in interpreting "employment" under IRC 3121(b). Nor does IRC 3509 apply if the employer intentionally disregarded the requirement to deduct and withhold the tax.
IRC 6651(a)(1) imposes a penalty for the failure to file a tax return by its required due date (determined with regard to any extension of time for filing). The penalty rate is 5 percent per month up to a maximum of 25 percent, computed on the amount of tax required to be shown on the return. The penalty is assessed unless the taxpayer can show that the failure to file was due to "reasonable cause" and not due to willful neglect. See IRM 22.214.171.124, Failure to File a Tax Return or to Pay Tax - IRC 6651.
For reduction of the failure to file penalty rate when it is combined with the failure to pay penalty, see IRM 126.96.36.199(5) and IRM 188.8.131.52.7.3, Limitation Under IRC 6651(c)(1).
IRC 6651(f) provides that if the failure to file is fraudulent, the penalty increases to 15 percent per month up to a maximum of 75 percent. Refer to IRM 184.108.40.206.7.5 , Fraudulent Failure to File - IRC 6651(f).
Generally, there is no provision for an extension of time to file an employment tax return under IRC 6081. However, deadline extensions may be granted for a Form 940 under Treas. Reg. 31.6081(a)-1(b) and for all employment tax returns under combat zone (IRC 7508) and disaster relief (IRC 7508A) provisions.
IRC 6651(a)(2) imposes a penalty for failure to pay tax shown on returns, unless the failure to pay is due to reasonable cause and not due to willful neglect. IRC 6651(a)(3) imposes a similar penalty for failure to pay tax not shown on the return within 21 days from the date of notice and demand for the tax (10 business days if the amount equals or exceeds $100,000). See IRM 220.127.116.11.8, Failure to Pay Tax — IRC 6651(a)(2) and (3), for more information.
When a delinquent return is received from a taxpayer during an examination, the examiner will determine whether the failure to pay penalty under IRC 6651(a)(2) should be asserted. The examiner’s recommendation for the assertion or non-assertion of the penalty will accompany each delinquent return sent to the Campus. If the delinquent return is received from the taxpayer with remittance, the examiner will solicit payment of the penalty when applicable.
The operating division that conducted the examination is solely responsible for determining whether the failure to pay penalty is applicable on delinquent returns secured. This procedure also applies when a "Substitute for Return" is prepared in a case where a delinquent return was due from the taxpayer.
The penalty imposed by IRC 6651(a)(2) is one-half of one percent of the tax shown on the taxpayer’s return that remains unpaid at the beginning of each penalty month. The penalty is limited to 25% in the aggregate. If the tax imposed is less than tax shown, the penalty is imposed on the lesser amount.
A taxpayer filed a 2005 return with $2,000.00 tax shown on the return. The taxpayer paid $800.00 on 10/15/2006, and made no other payments. The penalty would be one-half of one percent of $2,000.00 for six months (three percent of $2,000.00) plus one-half of one percent of $1,200.00 for 44 months (22 percent of $1,200.00) for a total of 25 percent in the aggregate, and a total penalty of $60.00 plus $264.00 = $324.00.
See IRM 18.104.22.168.8.4.1 , Amount Subject to IRC 6651(a)(2), for a definition of tax shown on the return. For rules for determining the unpaid amount of tax, see IRM 22.214.171.124.8.4.2 , Months Subject to IRC 6651(a)(2), for a definition of penalty month.
When the failure to file and failure to pay penalties both apply with respect to the same month, the penalty for filing late is reduced by the amount of the penalty for paying late, except when the minimum penalty applies for filing late.
A taxpayer filed a 2005 return in 2016 with $2,000.00 tax shown and imposed. The taxpayer had an extension of time to file until 10/15/2006, and the taxpayer made a payment of $800.00 on the extended due date. The taxpayer made no other payments. The failure to file penalty is five percent of $2,000.00 unpaid tax on the original return due date, beginning on the extended return due date and continuing at five percent per month for five months until 25 percent is reached. (25 percent of $2,000.00 = $500.00). The failure to pay penalty for those same five months is one-half of one percent of $1,200.00 for each of those five months, or two-and-one-half percent of $1,200.00 = $30. Therefore, the reduced failure to file penalty is $500.00 minus $30.00 = $470.00.
If a payment was made in the first five months following the return due date (including extensions) and before the return was filed, then the FTF and FTP penalties must both be computed for the months during which both penalties apply, and the FTF penalty must then be reduced by the amount of the FTP penalty for those months. See IRM 126.96.36.199.7.3, Limitation under IRC 6651(c)(1).
See IRC 6651(d) for certain situations in which the failure to pay penalty is increased to one percent. See also IRM 188.8.131.52.8.1.1, 1 Percent Penalty Rate—IRC 6651(d).
A failure to pay will generally be considered to be due to reasonable cause to the extent that the taxpayer has made a satisfactory showing that he exercised ordinary business care and prudence in providing for payment of his tax liability and was nevertheless either unable to pay the tax or would suffer an undue hardship if he paid on the due date. Treas. Reg. 301.6651-1(c). See also IRM 184.108.40.206.2, Policy Statement 3-2 (Formerly P-2-7), Reasonable cause for late filing of return or failure to deposit or pay tax when due, and IRM 20.1.1, Introduction and Penalty Relief.
IRC 6651(h) provides for a reduced one-quarter percent penalty rate for paying late for qualified individual taxpayers. An individual taxpayer can be a sole proprietor, as single member LLC, or the estate of a decedent. To qualify for the reduced rate, the related return must have been filed on time and the taxpayer must be paying the unpaid tax under an IRS approved installment agreement. If the taxpayer will be unable to fully pay his obligation upon notice and demand and the taxpayer would qualify for this lower penalty rate, the taxpayer should be given Form 9465, Installment Agreement Request, to apply for an IRS approved installment agreement. If the taxpayer owes $50,000 or less, he may qualify to set up an online installment agreement at: www.irs.gov/individuals/online-payment-agreement-application.
The Campus is primarily responsible for asserting the ad valorem penalty prescribed by IRC 6656 for failure of taxpayers and their agents to make deposits of certain employment taxes. However, examiners will:
Review transcripts of account to identify previously assessed penalties and determine if they were paid by the taxpayer or abated by the campuses.
Review the reasonable cause arguments submitted by the taxpayer and determine if the taxpayer took steps to correct the cause. If not, subsequent penalties may be due.
Review the record of liabilities on the returns to determine its accuracy and that it is in balance with the stated liabilities on the return. An imbalance could mean an overstated/understated return or incomplete record of liabilities and additional penalties may be due.
Consider penalties on delinquent taxable returns obtained as a result of an examination, or an adjustment made for a period for which a "Substitute for Return" was prepared by the examiner in lieu of delinquent returns.
In the above cases, after considering the statement of the taxpayer or the taxpayer’s agent regarding late payment and without referring the matter to the campus, the examiner will recommend the assertion or non-assertion of the IRC 6656 penalty in the examination report, together with any appropriate comments in the report transmittal or workpapers. IRM 20.1.4, Penalty Handbook - Failure to Deposit Penalty, contains instructions for computing the penalty for amended or supplemental returns and FUTA or CAWR adjustments.
The amount required to be deposited includes the employer's share of all employment taxes plus any amounts withheld from employees that were not deposited. If no tax was withheld from employees, the penalty is based only on the employer’s share of the tax. See Rev. Rul. 75-191.
Depositors are encouraged to correct errors in a timely manner based on a four-tier penalty structure. The amount of the penalty varies according to the time taken to correct the error. The penalty rates are:
Two percent if one to five days late,
Five percent if six to 15 days late,
Ten percent if 16 or more days late.
15 percent for taxes still unpaid after the 10th day following notice and demand.
The first time abate (FTA) is an administrative waiver or abatement available to a taxpayer for:
Failure to File (IRC 6651(a)(1), IRC 6698(a)(1), and IRC 6699(a)(1)),
Failure to Pay (IRC 6651(a)(2) and IRC 6651 (a)(3)), and/or
Failure to Deposit (IRC 6656) penalties.
The FTA waiver will be addressed during an employment tax examination when any of the above penalties are applicable or have been previously assessed.
The FTA waiver is available to taxpayers who have been in compliance for the three years prior to the audit period, if the following are true:
The taxpayer has not previously been required to file a return, or has no prior penalties (except the estimated tax penalty, TC 17X) for the preceding three years on the same MFT, and
The taxpayer has filed, or filed a valid extension for, all currently required returns and paid, or arranged to pay, any tax due.
Example: Consider the taxpayer current if there is an open installment agreement and the taxpayer is current with the installment payments.
The FTA waiver or abatement applies to a single tax period for a given MFT. For example, if the FTA penalty waiver or abatement is being considered for two or more tax periods on the same MFT and the earliest tax period meets FTA waiver criteria, the FTA waiver applies only to the earliest tax period, not all tax periods being considered. Penalty waiver or abatement for all subsequent tax periods will be based on the showing of reasonable cause (and, where applicable, the absence of willful neglect).
To determine eligibility for the FTA waiver or abatement, the examiner must:
Research the three prior years,
Research all current periods, and
Document the clean compliance history of the taxpayer.
If the taxpayer has a clean compliance history and the FTA waiver or abatement applies, the examiner will document the clean compliance history of the taxpayer in Leadsheet 300 - Penalty Approval Form, or appropriate leadsheet. "Clean compliance" is generally defined as "all returns filed and no penalties in prior three years."
To research the prior three years for purposes of checking the eligibility for the FTA waiver or abatement, the examiner may use IDRS command codes BMFOLT, BMFOLR and TXMODA. The examiner will:
Review the account for un-reversed penalties. See IRM Exhibit 20.1.1-3, Penalty Transaction Codes, for a listing of all penalty transaction codes.
Review all tax periods for the previous three years to determine if the taxpayer has already been granted relief using the FTA waiver criteria as reflected by the FTA PRCs (Penalty Reason Codes):
- The PRC of "018" signifies the FTA waiver or abatement has been granted due to a manual look-back, rather than by use of the Reasonable Cause Assistant (RCA).
- The PRC of "020" signifies the FTA waiver or abatement has been granted using the RCA. See IRM 220.127.116.11.6.2, Penalty Reason Codes, for more information.
If there is a TC 290 for zero with a penalty reason code of "018" , "020" , or "021" , the taxpayer has already been granted the FTA waiver or abatement. In that case, the FTA waiver is no longer available and the examiner must consider reasonable cause to waive or abate any penalties.
If the FTA waiver or abatement applies and there is no TC290 for zero with penalty reason code "018" , "020" , or "021" , the examiner must offer the FTA waiver or abatement to the taxpayer and explain why it applies, even if the taxpayer does not specifically request it.
If the FTA waiver or abatement is granted, the examiner must notify the taxpayer, either verbally or by letter, that the penalty non-assertion or removal was based on the taxpayer’s history of compliance rather than on information the taxpayer provided. The examiner should also include an explanation to educate the taxpayer about how to be compliant in the future. If the examiner prefers to issue a letter to the taxpayer, the examiner must prepare it and issue it with the approval of the group manager. IRM 18.104.22.168.6.1 (7) contains language examiners can use to prepare this letter.
When closing the case to CCP, the examiner will notate in the Special Features/ Other Instructions block of Form 3198, Special Handling Notice for Examination Case Processing, "Form 3870, Request for Adjustment, for First Time Abate is included in the file."
Prepare the Form 3870, completing only the boxes noted:
Box 1: Enter the TIN.
Box 2: Enter the Name and Address of the taxpayer.
Box 4: Enter the MFT associated with this waiver or abatement.
Box 5: Enter tax period.
Box 11: Enter "Please input TC 290 for zero with penalty code 018. Taxpayer qualifies for First Time Abate or wavier for (MFT) (Tax Period)."
Box 13: The examiner must sign and date.
Box 14: The group manager must sign and date Form 3870 and including their phone and fax numbers.
For additional information about First Time Abate, including criteria for when FTA conclusion does not apply, see (5) IRM 22.214.171.124.6.1, First Time Abate (FTA).
The penalties for failure to file certain information returns under IRC 6721 and for failure to furnish certain statements under IRC 6722 shall not be imposed with respect to any failure due to reasonable cause and not to willful neglect, see IRC 6724(a). Also see IRM 126.96.36.199.2, Policy Statement 3-2 (Formerly P-2-7, "Reasonable cause for late filing of return or failure to deposit or pay tax when due," and IRM 188.8.131.52.1, Reasonable Cause, in the Penalty Handbook. The entity must make an affirmative showing of reasonable cause in the form of a written statement, under the penalties of perjury, setting forth all the facts alleged as reasonable cause.
Penalties may be asserted for both the failure to file and the failure to furnish Forms W–2. Filing the information return with the SSA under IRC 6051(d) is not a prerequisite for imposition of the failure to furnish penalty.
By law, the Form W–2 for back year examinations are delinquent. Only Form W–2c can be timely filed by the last day of February of the following year and not be subject to a penalty. Therefore, if reasonable cause does not exist, the examiner must prepare and enclose a Penalty Case File in addition to the employment tax case file. See IRM 184.108.40.206, Information Return Penalty Case File, for instructions.
Under IRC 6674, an employer who willfully furnishes a false or fraudulent statement, or who willfully fails to furnish a statement in the manner, at the time, and showing the information required under IRC 6051 or IRC 6053(b) may be subject to a penalty of $50 for each failure, which shall be assessed and collected in the same manner as the tax on employers imposed under IRC 3111. There is no maximum limit on the amount of penalties under IRC 6674.
IRC 6041(a) states "All persons engaged in a trade or business and making payment in the course of such trade or business to another person, of rent, salaries, wages, premiums, annuities, compensations, remunerations, emoluments, or other fixed or determinable gains, profits, and income (other than payments to which section 6042(a)(1), 6044(a)(1), 6047(e), 6049(a), or 6050N(a) applies, and other than payments with respect to which a statement is required under the authority of section 6042(a)(2), 6044(a)(2), or 6045), of $600 or more in any taxable year, or, in the case of such payments made by the United States, the officers or employees of the United States having information as to such payments and required to make returns in regard thereto by the regulations hereinafter provided for, shall render a true and accurate return to the Secretary, under such regulations and in such form and manner and to such extent as may be prescribed by the Secretary, setting forth the amount of such gains, profits, and income, and the name and address of the recipient of such payment." Form 1099–MISC, Miscellaneous Income, is used by the payor to report these payments.
In addition, IRC 6041(d) provides that the payor must furnish the payee a written statement setting forth the amount of such payments. A copy of Form 1099–MISC may be used for this purpose. The time for furnishing the statement to the payee is set forth in section 6041(d). The statement must be furnished to the payee on or before January 31st of the year following the calendar year for which the return was made.
The time for filing the returns with the Service, along with Form 1096, Annual Summary and Transmittal of U.S. Information Returns, is discussed in Treas. Reg. 1.6041– 6. Paper returns must be filed on or before February 28 of the following calendar year for which the returns were required under IRC 6041. Under IRC 6071(b), e-filed returns must be e-filed on or before March 31st.
Per section 201 of P.L. 114-113 (H.R. 2029, Protecting Americans from Tax Hikes Act), effective for tax year 2016, Forms W-2, W3, 1099-MISC with Nonemployee Compensation (NEC), box 7 income amount, is due to IRS January 31 for both paper-filed and e-filed forms. Forms 1099-MISC with no data in box 7 follow current law (due February 28 or March 31 for e-filed forms.
For information on the requirements for filing Forms 1099 by magnetic media (including electronic filing), see the regulations under IRC 6011. In general, if the taxpayer is required to file 250 or more information returns (Form W–2, Form 1042–S, Form 1099, Form 1098, Form 5498, or Form W–2G), then magnetic media must be used.
IRC 6051(a), Receipts for Employees, and Treas. Reg. 31.6051–1(a) and (b) provide that employers must furnish the tax return copy and the employee’s copy of Form W–2, Wage and Tax Statement, to employees for remuneration paid during the calendar year.
The Form W–2 must show, among other information, the total amount of wages paid subject to withholding of income tax, the total amount of wages paid subject to FICA tax (including Additional Medicare Tax), and the total amounts of income tax and FICA tax deducted (including Additional Medicare Tax).
Generally, the time for furnishing the Form W-2, Wage and Tax Statement, to each employee is on or before January 31 of the succeeding year. However, if an employee whose employment is terminated before the close of the calendar year requests the employer to furnish the Form W-2 at an earlier time, the employer must furnish the Form W-2 within 30 days of the employee’s request or within 30 days of the final wage payment, whichever is later.
Treas. Reg. 31.6051–1(c) further provides that corrected statements (Form W–2c) must be furnished to employees whenever the originally issued Form W–2 was incorrect.
The general rule concerning the time for furnishing both original Forms W–2 and corrected statements to the employee is set forth in Treas. Reg. 31.6051–1(d), "Each statement required by this section for a calendar year and each corrected statement required for the year shall be furnished to the employee on or before January 31 of the year succeeding such calendar year."
Treas. Reg. 31.6051–2(a) provides that every employer who is required to make and furnish Form W–2 to each employee under Treas. Reg. 31.6051–1 must file a copy of each form, along with the transmittal Form W–3, with the Social Security Administration. For calendar years prior to 2016, the general rule concerning the time for filing Forms W–2 (or magnetic tape or other approved media) is set forth in Treas. Reg. 31.6071(a)–1(a)(3)(i), which provides that such statements must be filed on or before the last day of February following the calendar year for which they are made. March 31st is the due date for electronically filed returns. For calendar year 2016 and thereafter, the general rule provides that such statements must be filed on or before the last day of January following the calendar year for which they are made whether filed using paper forms or electronically.
Treas. Reg. 31.6051–2(b) further provides that corrected statements (Forms W–2c) must be submitted to the Social Security Administration on or before the date the information returns for the period that correction is made would be due under Treas. Reg. 31.6071(a)–1(a)(3)(ii).
IRC 6721 imposes a penalty for failure to file correct (on paper or magnetic media) information returns (including Form W–2 and Form 1099) on the date prescribed under IRC 6041(a) or IRC 6051(a). The provisions for a reduction in these penalty amounts are based on the number of days late. Refer to IRM 220.127.116.11.5.
If the failure to timely file correct information returns is due to intentional disregard of the filing requirements, there is no maximum limit on the amount of penalties. Refer to IRM 18.104.22.168.5.
Exception for de minimis failures: In general, IRC 6721(c) provides that if:
Information returns have been filed but were filed with incomplete or incorrect information, and
The failures are corrected on or before August 1 of the calendar year in which the returns were due,
then the penalty will not apply to the greater of 10 returns, or one-half of one percent of the total number of information returns required to be filed by the filer during the calendar year.
IRC 6721(d) provides lower limitations for persons with gross receipts of not more than $5 million. See IRM 22.214.171.124.5.
IRC 6722 imposes a penalty for failure to furnish correct payee statements on the date prescribed to a payee when required under IRC 6041(a) or IRC 6051(a). The provisions for a reduction in these penalty amounts are based on the number of days late. Refer to IRM 126.96.36.199.5.
If the failure to furnish correct information returns is due to intentional disregard of the requirements, there is no maximum limit on the amount of penalties. Refer to IRM 188.8.131.52.5 .
Exception for de minimis failures: In general, IRC 6722(c) provides that if:
Information returns have been filed but were filed with incomplete or incorrect information, and
The failures are corrected on or before August 1 of the calendar year in which the returns were due,
then the penalty will not apply to the greater of 10 returns, or one-half of one percent of the total number of information returns required to be filed by the filer during the calendar year.
IRC 6722(d) provides lower limitations for persons with gross receipts of not more than $5 million. See IRM 184.108.40.206.5.
Effective for returns due on or after January 1, 2016, the Trade Preferences Extension Act (TPEA) of 2015, section 806, increased the IRC 6721 and IRC 6722 penalty and maximum rates as follows:
Base penalty rate from $100 to $250,
The intentional disregard penalty rate from $250 to $500,
The maximum calendar year penalties for large businesses; gross receipts from $1.5 million to $3 million,
The maximum calendar year penalties for small businesses; gross receipts from $500,000 to $1.5 million, and
The tiered penalty rates for corrections made on or before August 1 of the filing year.
De minimis error safe harbor. For returns and statements filed after the 2016 tax year, no penalty should be imposed against employers that file an information return and that furnishes a payee statement but the information return and payee statement are inaccurate. The safe harbor could be used for an error in the tax withholding repored if the error between the amount withheld and the amount reported is different by an amount not greater than $25. The safe harbor can also be used for an error with a non-tax withholding amount if the error is not greater than $100. The issuer of the information return should not be required to file a corrected return.
IRC sections 6721(b) late-filed tier penalties are reflected in the following charts.
Exhibit 20.1.7-1, IRC 6721 Penalty for Large Businesses with Gross Receipts Over $5 Million
Exhibit 20.1.7-2, IRC 6721 Penalty for Small Businesses with Gross Receipts Less Than or Equal to $5 Million
IRC 6721 penalty rates and maximum amounts are subject to inflationary adjustments enacted by the Tax Increase Prevention Act (TIPA) of 2014, section 208, effective for returns required to be filed in a calendar year beginning after 2014. IRC 6721(f) provides inflation adjustments to the per-failure and maximum penalties for failure to file information returns.
IRC sections 6722(b) failure to furnish correct payee statement penalties are reflected in the following charts:
Exhibit 20.1.7-3, IRC 6722 Penalty for Large Businesses with Gross Receipts Over $5 Million
Exhibit 20.1.7-4, IRC 6722 Penalty for Small Businesses with Gross Receipts Less Than or Equal to $5 Million
IRC 6722 penalty rates and maximum amounts are subject to inflationary adjustments enacted by the Tax Increase Prevention Act (TIPA) of 2014, section 208, effective for returns required to be filed in a calendar year beginning after 2014. IRC 6722(f) provides inflation adjustments to the per-failure and maximum penalties for failure to furnish payee statements.
Each information return "stands alone" for the determination of penalties and the appropriate statute date. Examiners must determine which information documents have been filed and which have not in order to establish the correct statute date for the penalty assessment case file.
If the information return(s) subject to the proposed penalties have been timely filed, the statute date will be three years from the due date or, if late filed, three years from the actual date filed. IRM 220.127.116.11, Penalties under IRC Sections 6721 and 6722, discusses how to extend the statute of limitations on the assessment of information return penalties. If the information return(s) subject to the proposed penalties have not been filed, Alpha Statute "EE" , non-filed return, will be used for case file controls.
In situations where examiners have both filed and non-filed documents subject to proposed penalties, the examiner must determine if the statute date on the filed documents is still open. If so, they must use and protect that date when establishing the penalty case file controls. The Examination Return Control System (ERCS) will allow only one information return penalty case to be established for each taxpayer/year. If the statute date for the filed returns has expired, the examiner may pursue penalties only on the non- filed documents. In this situation Alpha Statute "EE" may be used to establish controls.
The Payor Master File On-line (PMFOL) IDRS Command Code PMFOLD can be used to help with the Assessment Statute Expiration Date (ASED) determination. PMFOLD will reflect a "DTE RECD" under each Form 1096, Annual Summary and Transmittal of U.S. Information Returns, transmittal record. This date is the actual date the Form(s) 1099 were processed and not necessarily the date they were filed. The PMFOLD will show how many Form(s) W-2 were filed, however it does not reflect a received date for the Form W-3 transmittal since this form is filed with the Social Security Administration (SSA). Examiners should consider information returns as being timely filed unless there is evidence of a late filing date when determining the appropriate statute for filed Form(s) 1099 and W-2.
The following questions and answers provide guidance for the assertion of penalties for failure to file certain information returns or to furnish certain statements.
Q–1. As a result of reclassification of individuals to employee status, would penalties be applicable against the employer for failure to file and failure to furnish Forms 1099?
A–1. No penalty under IRC 6721 for failure to file Form 1099 would be applicable, because no returns are required by IRC 6041(a). The individuals are employees, not independent contractors. Similarly, no failure to furnish penalty under IRC 6722 would be applicable for failure to furnish Forms 1099.
Q–2. Would the payor be liable for penalties for failure to file and failure to furnish Form W–2 as a result of the reclassification of individuals to employee status if no Forms 1099 were filed or furnished to the payees?
A–2. The payor would be liable for both the failure to file penalty under IRC 6721 and the failure to furnish penalty under IRC 6722, absent reasonable cause. If Forms W–2 are secured by the examiner, the IRC 6721 failure to file penalty may be asserted because these returns were not filed on the date prescribed in the regulations. If the Forms W–2 are furnished to employees subsequent to the examination, the IRC section 6722 penalty may be asserted because these returns were not furnished on the date prescribed in the regulations. If the payor refuses to file Forms W–2, assertion of the penalty under IRC section 6721 for intentional disregard of the filing requirement may be considered. If the payor refuses to furnish Forms W–2, the penalty under IRC 6674 may be considered. There is no maximum limit on the amount imposed under IRC section 6674 or for intentional disregard under IRC section 6721.
Q–3. If Forms 1099 were filed and furnished by the payor prior to reclassification to employee status, could civil penalties be asserted for failure to file and failure to furnish Forms W–2?
A–3. Absent reasonable cause, the penalties for failure to file and furnish Forms W–2 would be applicable even though the payor previously filed Forms 1099, because the requirements of IRC 6051 and the applicable regulations had not been met.
Q–4. Does the fact that an employer withheld or failed to withhold income tax have any effect on the assertion of the failure to file and failure to furnish penalties?
A–4. The penalties should be asserted against the employer who fails to file and furnish Form W–2, regardless of withholding.
Q–5. If wage adjustments are determined as part of an employment tax examination, will an employer be required to file and furnish Form W–2c?
A–5. Yes. Forms W–2c must be filed and furnished by the employer pursuant to Treas. Reg. 31.6051–2. Forms W–2c must be furnished to employees on or before January 31 of the year succeeding the calendar year in which the wage adjustment is determined. Forms W–2c must be filed with the Social Security Administration on or before the last day of February for calendar year 2016 only, (and thereafter January) for the year succeeding the calendar year in which the wage adjustment is determined. In an examination situation, the term "in which the wage adjustment is determined" refers to the period in which the taxpayer settled the employment tax case with the Service. If the Forms W-2c are not secured by the examiner, prepare a tickler file and send to Employment Tax - Workload Selection and Delivery (ET- WSD) at:
201 W Rivercenter Blvd
Stop 5702A/Employment Tax Tickler File
Covington, KY 41011
for monitoring the filing of the returns and to determine if the case warrants assignment to a group for a follow-up examination.
Q–6. If Form W–2c is required to be filed and furnished after an employment tax examination, should an employer be given a reasonable period of time, such as 30 days, to meet these requirements?
A–6. A "reasonable time" standard is not appropriate in this instance because the time for filing and furnishing Form W–2c is set forth in the regulations. Refer to A–5 above. The requirements for filing Form W–2c are provided to the taxpayer via the bottom part of Form 4668, Employment Tax Examination Changes Report. However, the "reasonable time" standard should be applied when attempting to secure Form W–2 where reclassification adjustments are imposed.
Q–7. If an employer fails to file and furnish Forms W–2c after an employment tax examination by the time required would the penalties for failure to file and failure to furnish information returns be applicable?
A–7. The penalties for failure to file and failure to furnish Forms W–2 at the conclusion of an examination would be equally applicable for failure to file and furnish Forms W–2c at the prescribed time set forth at the bottom of Form 4668 and the employment tax regulations.
IRC 6723 provides a penalty for the failure to include all required information or correct information on either the information return or payee statement. A penalty of $50 is imposed for each incorrect information return or statement with a maximum penalty of $100,000 per year.
The information reporting requirements specified for this purpose include any requirement to include a correct taxpayer identification number on a return or statement and any requirement to furnish a correct taxpayer identification to another person. See IRM 18.104.22.168, Failure to Comply with Other Information Reporting Requirements IRC 6723, and Publication 1586, Reasonable Cause Regulations and Requirements for Missing and Incorrect Name/TINs (including instructions for reading CD/DVDs and Magnetic Media), for more detailed information.
No penalty shall be imposed under IRC 6723 if a penalty is imposed under IRC 6721 or IRC 6722 .
IRC 6672, the Trust Fund Recovery Penalty, provides:
General Rule. Any person required to collect, truthfully account for, and pay over any tax imposed by this title who willfully fails to collect such tax, or truthfully account for and pay over such tax, or willfully attempts in any manner to evade or defeat any such tax or the payment thereof, shall, in addition to other penalties provided by law, be liable for a penalty equal to the total amount of the tax evaded, or not collected, or not accounted for and paid over. No penalty shall be imposed under IRC 6653 or part II of Subchapter A of chapter 68 for any offense to which this section is applicable.
The purpose of IRC 6672 is to encourage the prompt payment of withheld and other collected taxes and to provide the Service with a secondary source of collection in the event that these taxes are not paid. The withheld taxes are commonly referred to as "trust fund taxes," reflecting the Code’s provision that such withholdings or collections are deemed to be a "special fund in trust for the United States." See IRC 7501 and Slodov v. United States, 436 U.S. 238 (1978). When the trust fund taxes are not paid by the employer, the Trust Fund Recovery Penalty may be assessed against the responsible persons for willful failure to collect or pay over the taxes. IRC 6672 only applies to persons responsible for collection and payment of these trust fund taxes. See Slodov 436 U.S. at 244-245.
The Service’s policy is to collect the full tax only once; from the employer or from one or more of the responsible persons. Policy Statement 5-14 (formerly P–5–60) in IRM 22.214.171.124.3 provides:
The trust fund recovery penalty, applicable to withheld income and employment (social security [FICA, Medicare (including Additional Medicare)] and railroad retirement) taxes or collected excise taxes, will be used to facilitate the collection of tax and enhance voluntary compliance. If a business has failed to collect or pay over income and employment taxes, or has failed to pay over collected excise taxes, the trust fund recovery penalty may be asserted against those determined to have been responsible and willful in failing to pay over the tax. Responsibility and willfulness must both be established. The withheld income and employment taxes or collected excise taxes will be collected only once, whether from the business, or from one or more of its responsible persons.
See (2) in IRM 126.96.36.199.3, Policy Statement 5-14 (Formerly P–5–60).
The statutory period for assessment of a Trust Fund Recovery Penalty, with respect to any taxable period within a calendar year, is three years from the succeeding April 15 or from the date the return was filed, whichever is later. The statutory period for assessment for any unpaid trust fund tax arising from an adjustment made to a taxpayer filed return remains the original statute date based on the filed return.
IRC 6672 does not prohibit the assertion of the Trust Fund Recovery Penalty against responsible persons where the addition to the tax for fraud is asserted against the employer. Section 6672 only bars the assertion of the fraud and accuracy-related penalties against a responsible person liable for the Trust Fund Recovery Penalty. The fraud and accuracy-related penalties apply to any underpayment of tax and can be asserted against the employer based on the acts of its officers (including fraud, negligence or disregard of rules or regulations).
Requests for Collection determinations for the assertion or non-assertion of the Trust Fund Recovery Penalty will be sent to the Collection Advisory group in the geographic area in which the taxpayer is located. They will have an investigation initiated per IRM 188.8.131.52.1, Referral from Examination, by a revenue officer to make the determination. See Pub 4235, Collection Advisory Group Addresses, for location of Collection Advisory groups. See IRM 5.7.4, Trust Fund Compliance - Investigation and Recommendation of TFRP.
Form 6238, Referral Report for Potential 100 Percent Penalty Cases, will be completed according to the instructions provided in IRM 184.108.40.206.2 below, and the original and one copy forwarded to Collection Advisory through the SB/SE field territory manager, the LB&I team manager, or the TE/GE manager.
For all cases where there is an indication that the Trust Fund Recovery Penalty applies, examiners will include appropriate remarks in their workpapers and include a copy of the completed Form 6238 in the case file. If possible, the examiner will secure Form 2750, Waiver Extending Statutory Period for Assessment of Trust Fund Recovery Penalty, from every responsible party for all tax periods when the Trust Fund Recovery Penalty assessment statute will expire within two years for unagreed cases; one year for agreed cases. See IRM 220.127.116.11, Form 2750, Waiver Extending Statutory Period for Assessment of the Trust Fund Recovery Penalty, for procedures regarding the Form 2750.
For those cases where Form 6238 was not prepared, examiners will comment in the workpapers that referral to Collection Advisory was considered but not made and include the reason(s) for not making a referral to Collection Advisory.
Items 1 through 6 of Form 6238 will be completed by the examiner. Item 7, although on the form, should be left blank. The examiner will include the examiner’s name, phone number, and the date the form was prepared. Forward the original and one copy of the form to the Collection Advisory through the SB/SE Field Territory Manager, the LB&I team manager, or the TE/GE manager.
Item completion instructions are as follows:
Item 1: Name and Address of Taxpayer — enter name and current address of taxpayer.
Item 2: Employer Identification Number — enter employer identification number; if none, enter "None" .
Item 3: Tax Periods — enter all tax periods for which there is an indication that the Trust Fund Recovery Penalty may apply.
Item 4: The statute of limitations for the Trust Fund Recovery Penalty (TFRP) is treated like that of the employment tax returns. However, an extended statute date on Form SS–10DOES NOT extend the statute for the Trust Fund Recovery Penalty. Form 2750, Waiver Extending Statutory Period for Assessment of Trust Fund Recovery Penalty, must be used for this purpose. List the earliest statute expiration date for multiple year examinations.
Item 5: List the employment tax issues for which the trust fund recovery penalty may apply. Enter the total amount of income tax withholding, the total amount of withheld FICA tax, or the total of other withheld taxes (withholding on gambling winnings and withholding at source) that may be subject to the trust fund recovery penalty.
Item 6: Provide names, titles, and SSNs of all persons who appear responsible for not collecting, accounting for, or paying over the taxes.
Item 7: Leave blank.
If the case is going to Appeals, the examiner will provide the location of the Collection Advisory Group and include the following statement on the Form 4665, Report Transmittal: "If case is upheld in Appeals, please forward enclosed Form 6238 to the Collection Advisory group in the geographic area in which the taxpayer is located."
See Pub 4235, Collection Advisory Group Addresses, for location of Collection Advisory groups.
The return preparer penalties under IRC 6694 apply to preparers of all tax returns, including employment tax returns. See IRM 20.1.6 , Penalty Handbook - Preparer, Promoter, Material Advisor Penalties for general procedures and IRM 4.23.17, Preparer Penalty Procedures for SB/SE Employment Tax for employment tax procedures. See also Announcement 2009-15 and Treas. Reg. 31.6694-1.
Business Master File (BMF) Identity Theft is defined as creating, using, or attempting to use business’ identifying information, without authority, to obtain tax benefits. See IRM 18.104.22.168, Key Definitions.
Examiners may encounter potential BMF Identity Theft by a contact made during an examination or based on research found during pre-analysis of the assigned case. Most employment tax cases with possible BMF Identify Theft involve filed Form(s) W-2 where:
No corresponding employment tax returns have been filed, or
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) is not a valid EIN (fictitious EIN), or
The EIN cannot be associated with a “live” business, or
The EIN is associated with a "live" business but no other business activity can be found, the owner cannot be located, and no other evidence indicates a business exists, or
The owner of the EIN is located but is able to document that they had no employees and did not file the Forms W-2 in question.
When an examiner is advised or otherwise suspects that an assigned case involves BMF ID Theft, the examiner will initially discuss their suspicions with their manager.
Examiners must conduct specific research to determine whether or not BMF ID Theft exists. The depth of the research will be dependent upon each case.
If the examiner has contact with the true owner of the EIN, they must ask specific questions to ensure the Form(s) W-2 were not filed by that owner. Some facts that may help with the determination include:
Has the business changed entities? For example, the business has changed from a sole proprietor to an Limited Liability Corporation (LLC). There may a second EIN and this maybe a case of the returns being filed incorrectly.
Has the company changed payroll companies? Many times a payroll company has been changed but the previous payroll company still files a return or submits Forms W-2.
If there are payments present, did the taxpayer make any payments? Payment research may provide another EIN or entity information.
Was the business sold or closed? Was a final return filed?
If the taxpayer states they never applied for an EIN or indicate they have been out of business for several years, have they had any ID theft tax related issues under their SSN?
Additional steps the examiner will perform include:
Carefully review any documentation the taxpayer has provided in support of their claim.
Perform all required research to rule out a mixed entity or successor corporation, and to locate any possible cross-reference TIN. Refer to IRM Exhibit 25.23.9-7 , BMF Identity Theft Research Requirement.
Internet Research should include Google Maps to identify the business location and Google research for the business entity.
If the research conducted by the examiner reveals no BMF ID Theft, the examiner will continue with the examination following normal procedures.
If the research conducted by the examiner reveals BMF ID Theft does exist, the examiner will complete Form 4844, Request for Terminal Action, to request input of a Transaction Code (TC) 971, Action Code (AC) 522, IDTCLM (IDTCLM is the Tax Administration Code). On Form 4844, enter the date the potential ID theft was identified by the taxpayer or the employee in the "Secondary Date" field. Form 4844 will be submitted through the manager to the BMF ID Theft Analyst for SB/SE Employment Tax Policy. Use the following link for a list of analysts and their program assignments: http://mysbse.web.irs.gov/examination/specialty/et/contacts/19791.aspx
The BMF ID Theft Analyst will submit the Form 4844 to the Designated Identity Theft Adjustment (DITA) for input. The examiner must hold the case pending input or rejection of the Form 4844.
ID Theft cases open on AIMS/Exam Return Control System (ERCS) are monitored using Input Aging Reason Code (ARC) "14" , (Identity Theft). Examiners must update AIMS/ERCS with ARC "14" for each impacted open tax year when ID theft is suspected. ARC "14" has priority and will overlay all other ARCs.
If the examiner receives new information that shows ID Theft does not exist, they must take steps to reverse the indicators previously input. See IRM Exhibit 25.23.9-5, Reversing BMF Identity Theft Indicators - TC 972 AC 522.
If it is determined that the EIN is a fictitious EIN, specific steps must be followed. See IRM 22.214.171.124.1, Fictitious EINS Procedures for additional information. In addition, the examiner will contact the appropriate Employment Tax ID Theft Liaison found at: http://serp.enterprise.irs.gov/databases/irm-sup.dr/identity_theft_bmf.dr/BMF_ID_Theft_Liaison_Listing.htm.
If the Form 4844 is input, examiners will follow specific closing actions depending on whether there was an employment tax return filed or not. See IRM 126.96.36.199.2 and IRM 188.8.131.52.3.
To prevent an invalid assessment, the examiner will close the case using Disposal Code (DC) "39" via Form 10904, Request for Record Deletion from AIMS/ERCS. Form 10904 and the appropriate documentation will be submitted to the local AIMS/ERCS analyst for final closure.
Form 4844 will be submitted to the ID Theft analyst to close the ID Theft controls. The Form 4844 will request input of TC971. AC 522, CLSIDT (CLSIDT is the Tax Administration Code).
If an employment tax return was filed and it is determined the return was not filed by the owner of the EIN, the examiner must take steps to correct the module. See IRM 184.108.40.206, Victim Account Corrections - Processing Steps, and IRM 220.127.116.11, Suspension of Collection Activity for Identity Theft Cases.
When the case is ready for final closure, the examiner will submit Form 4844 to the ID Theft analyst to close the ID Theft controls. The Form 4844 will request input of TC971. AC 522, CLSIDT.
If the examiner has contact with the true owner of the EIN, the examiner must:
Inform the true owner that their EIN was used to file Forms W-2,
Advise the true owner to respond immediately to any notices from the IRS,
Direct the true owner to the Federal Trade Commission Identity Theft web-page at: https://www.identitytheft.gov/, and
Document all discussions in the case file.
|IRC 6721 and IRC 6722: Failure to File Correct Information Return and Failure to Furnish Correct Payee Statement — Reference Numbers 600/612|
|For purposes of assessing the addition to the tax under IRC 6721 and IRC 6722, if the person required to make the return fails to file the return with the Service (SSA for Form W-2) or to furnish a payee statement, pursuant to IRC 6501(c)(3), the addition to the tax may be assessed at any time. If such person files the return after its due date (including any extension of time to file), the addition to the tax must be assessed within three years of filing the return. A statute extension secured on Form SS–10, Consent to Extend the Time to Assess Employment Taxes, does not extend the statute of limitations on these penalties. The consent covers only those penalties that are directly connected to an employment tax adjustment.|
|Form 872-B, Consent to Extend the Time to Assess Miscellaneous Excise Taxes, is used to extend the statute of limitations on IRC 6721 and IRC 6722 penalties. See IRM 18.104.22.168 for additional information, Penalties under IRC Sections 6721 and 6722.|
|IRC 6679: Failure to File Returns with Respect to Foreign Corporations or Foreign Partnerships — Reference Number 613|
|The penalty under IRC 6679 must be assessed within three years after the return is filed with the Service (including any extension of time to file) (IRC 6501(a)). If no return is filed with the Service, the penalty may be assessed at any time (IRC 6501(c)(3)).|
|IRC 6682: False Information with Respect to Withholding — Reference Number 616|
|The penalty under IRC 6682 must be assessed within three years after the filing of the return for which the penalized activity takes place.|
|IRC 6694(a): Understatement of Taxpayer’s Liability by Tax Return Preparer : Understatement Due to Unreasonable Position - Reference Number 645|
|The penalty under IRC 6694(a) must be assessed within three years after the return or claim for refund, with respect to which the penalty is assessed, was filed. Extending the statute on the taxpayer’s return does not extend the statute for the return preparer penalty case. The statute for the return preparer penalty case is extended by the execution of a Form 872-D, Consent to Extend the Time on Assessment of Tax Return Preparer Penalty. Refer to IRM 22.214.171.124, Statute of Limitations.|
|IRC 6694(b): Understatement of Taxpayer’s Liability by Tax Return Preparer : Understatement Due to Willful or Reckless Conduct— Reference Number 650|
|The penalty under 6694(b) may be assessed at any time; there is no statute of limitations.|
|IRC 6695: Other Assessable Penalties with Respect to Preparation of Income Tax Returns — Reference Numbers 624/626|
|The statute of limitations is the same as that of IRC 6694(a). Refer to IRM 126.96.36.199, Statute of Limitations.|
|IRC 6702: Frivolous Income Tax Return — Reference Number 666|
|If a frivolous return does not constitute a valid return and is not processed by the Service as a return, the IRC 6702 penalty may be assessed at any time. If the frivolous return does constitute a valid return or is processed by the Service as a return, the penalty must be assessed within three years after the return was filed. The frivolous return penalty can also be asserted against an amended return.|