- 4.24.10 Appeals Referral Procedures
- 188.8.131.52 Program Scope and Objectives
- 184.108.40.206.1 Background
- 220.127.116.11.2 Authority
- 18.104.22.168.3 Responsibilities
- 22.214.171.124.4 Program Objectives and Review
- 126.96.36.199.5 Terms/Definitions/Acronyms
- 188.8.131.52.6 Related Resources
- 184.108.40.206 Appeals Process
- 220.127.116.11 Appeals Referral Process
- 18.104.22.168.1 Case Routing Procedures for Unagreed Excise Tax Cases to Appeals
- 22.214.171.124.2 Ex Parte Communications
- 126.96.36.199.3 Appeals Preconference Procedures
- 188.8.131.52 Fast Track Settlement
- 184.108.40.206.1 Determining Eligibility for Fast Track Settlement
- 220.127.116.11.2 Initiating Fast Track Settlement Process
- 18.104.22.168.3 Fast Track Settlement Sessions
- 22.214.171.124.4 Withdrawal or Termination of Fast Track Settlement
- 126.96.36.199.5 Fast Track Settlement Closing Procedures
- 188.8.131.52 Closing Agreement and Appeals to Tax Court
- 184.108.40.206 Appeals Feedback Procedures for Excise Tax Examination Cases
- Exhibit 4.24.10-1 Excise Tax - Letter Chart According to Situation
- Exhibit 4.24.10-2 Excise Tax - Letter Numbers and Descriptions
Part 4. Examining Process
Chapter 24. Excise Tax
Section 10. Appeals Referral Procedures
May 22, 2017
(1) This transmits a revision to IRM 4.24.10, Excise Tax, Appeals Referral Procedures.
(1) This IRM was updated to include information about the program’s system of internal controls.
(2) Editorial changes were been made throughout this IRM, such as updating electronic hyperlinks and IRM references. The table below identifies the significant changes in content.
|IRM Section Number||Description of Change|
|220.127.116.11 Purpose||Title changed to Program Scope and Objectives. New content added about information involving internal controls placed under this subsection to comply with rules and requirements under 18.104.22.168.|
|New 22.214.171.124.1||Title added Background. New content added about background to comply with rules and requirements under 126.96.36.199.1.|
|New 188.8.131.52.2||Title added Authority. New content added about legal authorities to comply with rules and requirements under 184.108.40.206.2.|
|New 220.127.116.11.3||Title added Responsibilities. New content about responsibilities added to comply with rules and requirements under 18.104.22.168.3.|
|New 22.214.171.124.4||Title changed to Program Objectives and Review. Information from 1.11.2 and IRM 1230, Internal Management Document System Handbook, added to comply with rules and requirements under 126.96.36.199.4.|
|New 188.8.131.52.5||Title added Terms/Definitions/Acronyms. A list of frequently used terms and definitions in the IRM process, including those related to management and internal controls, added to comply with the rules and requirements under 184.108.40.206.5 and 220.127.116.11.6.|
|New 18.104.22.168.6||Title added Related Resources. Information about technical guidance and information processing steps and methods for other excise tax abstracts other than general program added to comply with rules and requirements under 22.214.171.124.7.|
|126.96.36.199 Appeals Process||Content updated for clarity and editorial changes.|
|188.8.131.52.1 Excise Letter Chart - Letter Numbers and Descriptions||Content updated for clarity and editorial changes.|
|4..184.108.40.206 Docketed Examination Assistance||Section removed. Content deleted. Inapplicable to Excise Tax Examination Workload. See IRC 6211.|
|220.127.116.11 Appeals Referral Process||Content updated for clarity and editorial changes.|
|18.104.22.168.1 Case Routing Procedures for Unagreed Excise Tax Cases to Appeals||Content updated for clarity and editorial changes.|
|22.214.171.124.2 Ex Parte Communications||Content updated for clarity and editorial changes.|
|126.96.36.199.3 Appeals Preconference Procedures||Content updated for clarity and editorial changes.|
|188.8.131.52 Fast Track Settlement||Content updated for clarity and editorial changes.|
|184.108.40.206.1 Determining Eligibility for Fast Track Settlement.||Content updated for clarity and editorial changes.|
|220.127.116.11.2 Initiating Fast Track Settlement Process.||Content updated for clarity and editorial changes.|
|18.104.22.168.3 Fast Track Settlement Sessions.||Content updated for clarity and editorial changes.|
|22.214.171.124.4 Withdrawal or Termination of Fast Track Settlement||Content updated for clarity and editorial changes.|
|126.96.36.199.5 FTS Closing Procedures||Content updated for clarity and editorial changes.|
|188.8.131.52 Closing Agreements and Appeals to Tax Court.||Content updated for clarity and editorial changes.|
|184.108.40.206 Appeals Feedback Procedures for Excise Tax Examination Cases||Content updated for clarity and editorial changes.|
|Exhibit 4.24.10-1 Excise Tax - Letter Chart According to Situation||Content updated for clarity and editorial changes.|
|Exhibit 4.24.10-2 Excise Tax - Letter Numbers and Descriptions||Content updated for clarity and editorial changes.|
Director, Examination - Specialty Policy
Small Business/Self Employed
General Overview - This IRM provides specific information for excise managers and excise examiners who refer excise cases to Appeals. A taxpayer has the right to appeal an IRS decision in an independent forum that allows for a fair and impartial administrative appeal.
Purpose - This IRM explains the referral process for excise cases to Appeals.
Audience - This IRM is for Excise Tax Examination managers and excise examiners who refer excise cases to Appeals.
Policy Owner - Director, Examination - Speciality Policy is responsible for the administration, procedures and updates related to the referral of excise cases to Appeals.
Program Owner - Director, Examination - Specialty Examination owns Excise Tax Examination.
Primary Stakeholders - Appeals, AWSS, Counsel, LB&I, SB/SE Specialty Examination and Examination Quality & Technical Support (EQ&TS) are the primary stakeholders for this IRM.
The processes and procedures provided in this IRM are consistent with the objectives and goals for Excise Tax Examination as addressed in IRM 220.127.116.11.3.1, Organization and Staffing, Small Business and Self/Employed (SB/SE), Excise Tax Examination.
IRC 7803(a)(3) provides the taxpayer the right to appeal an IRS decision in an independent forum.
Director, Examination - Specialty Policy is the executive responsible for Excise Tax Examination policy and procedures.
Director, Examination - Specialty Examination is the executive responsible for examination operational compliance.
Chief, Excise Tax Examination is responsible for ensuring that information about referring an excise case to Appeals is communicated to and carried out by excise managers and excise examiners.
Program Goals - The processes and procedures provided in this IRM are consistent with the objectives or goals for Excise Tax Examination as addressed in IRM 18.104.22.168.3.1,Organization and Staffing, Small Business and Self/Employed (SB/SE), Excise Tax Examination.
Program Reports - Information regarding the reporting of program objectives are included on, but not limited to, the Headquarters Examination Monthly Briefing, Program Manager Monthly Briefing, Examination Operational Review and Business Performance Reviews, which are provided by the Director, Examination - Specialty Policy.
Program Effectiveness - Program effectiveness is measured by the Examination Quality Review Staff, in EQ&TS, which supports the SB/SE quality improvement program utilizing National Quality Review System (NQRS) to conduct independent case reviews from a statistically valid sample of examination case work. National, area and territory trend analyses on the quality attributes are used to establish baselines to assess program performance, identify opportunities to improve work processes, analyze causes for failure, assess the feasibility of possible solutions and measure the success of quality improvement efforts.
Annual Review - Program Manager, Excise Tax Policy is responsible for reviewing the information in this IRM annually to ensure accuracy and promote consistent tax administration.
The table below contains terms and their definitions used throughout this IRM.
Term Definition 30 Day Letter Formal, written communication issued to the taxpayer that reports the examination findings. Appeals Case Memorandum Standardized report issued by Appeals to the field that provides feedback on how a referred case was resolved. Ex Parte Communication Any communication between an Appeals employee and a party to a disputed case outside the presence of the opposing party or his or her representative. Fast Track Settlement A jointly administered program offered by IRS to expedite case resolution at the earliest opportunity. Joint Committee (JC) Review The JC Review oversees the preparation of JC reports for all examined/surveyed cases for Internal Revenue Code section 6405 refunds of income, estate and gift taxes, and certain excise taxes in excess of $2 million (current statutorily prescribed amount), ($5 million for C Corps) regardless of the business operating division.
The table below contains acronyms and their definitions used throughout this IRM.
Acronym Definition ACM Appeals Case Memorandum AO Appeals Officer ATM Appeals Team Manager AWSS Agency-Wide Shared Services EQ&TS Examination Quality & Technical Support FTS Fast Track Settlement IMS Issue Management System JC Review Joint Committee Review LB&I Large Business & International NQRS National Quality Review System RRA ‘98 Restructuring and Reform Act of 1998 SB/SE Small Business/Self Employed SOL Statute of Limitations SME Subject Matter Expert TBOR Taxpayer Bill of Rights WUNO Work Unit Number
Refer to IRM 22.214.171.124.4, Excise Tax Report Writing Guide, Unagreed Reports, for information about preparing unagreed cases that do not meet the timeframe for Appeals eligibility, which requires at least 365 days on the protection of the statute of limitations (SOL) period for assessing excise tax or where the taxpayer did not file a formal protest or sign an agreement and where proposed additions to tax will be assessed.
Refer to IRM 126.96.36.199.4, Case Closings, Closing Procedures for Unagreed Examinations Not to be Forwarded to Appeals, for information about closing procedures for unagreed cases that do not meet the timeframe for Appeals eligibility that require at least 365 days on the SOL or where the taxpayer did not file a protest or sign an agreement, and where the proposed additions to tax will be assessed.
IRS formally adopted a Taxpayer Bill of Rights (TBOR) in June 2014, which provides the nation’s taxpayers with a better understanding of their rights and helps reinforce the fairness of the tax system. In 2015, Congress charged the Commissioner with ensuring IRS employees are familiar with and act in accordance with taxpayer rights as afforded by IRC 7803(a)(3). IRS employees must be informed about taxpayer rights and be conscientious in the performance of their duties to honor, respect and effectively communicate those rights that may aid in reducing taxpayer burdens. IRS employees must administer the law with integrity and fairness and exercise professional judgment in conducting enforcement activities. Refer to Pub 1, Your Rights as a Taxpayer.
It is imperative that the excise examiner understand fully the appeals process and its impact on overall IRS compliance efforts.
Cases closing to Appeals for the first time on or after September 2, 2014, require at least 365 days on the SOL when they are received in Appeals.
There must be at least 210 days remaining on the SOL when a case is received in Excise Tax Examination, if Appeals returns the case to Excise Tax Examination for consideration of new information or new issues raised by the taxpayer.
There must be at least 180 days remaining on the SOL when a case is received in Appeals, if Appeals previously released jurisdiction on the case and returned it to Excise Tax Examination for additional work.
For purposes of case processing, the excise examiner should be aware of the 365 day requirement and plan accordingly when issuing a Letter 950-E, 30 Day Letter - Straight Deficiency on Over-Assessment for Excise Tax Examination Case, which is a written communication issued to the taxpayer that reports examination findings. If the case has 240 days or more remaining on the SOL, the excise examiner should follow the guidance under IRM 188.8.131.52.4, which includes issuing the 30 Day Letter, if the taxpayer has not expressed agreement. If the case is to go forward unagreed and the taxpayer wants to exercise his or her appeal rights, the taxpayer will need to sign a statute extension before the case arrives in Appeals so that 365 days remain on the SOL when the case is received in Appeals. The taxpayer will need to sign a statute extension that allows for sufficient time for preparing the rebuttal, shipping and processing the case in Technical Services (Tech Services) and allowing for 365 days on the SOL when it is projected to be received in Appeals. If the case has less than 240 days remaining on the statute, the report should be issued with Letter 5153-E,Examination Report Transmittal - Statute, or Letter 5153-A, Examination Report Transmittal - Statute Less Than 240 Days (Claim), whichever is applicable.
If a valid Form 872-B, Consent to Extend the Time to Assess Miscellaneous Excise Taxes, is not received, the case will be processed based on the proposed changes as an unagreed case not eligible for consideration by Appeals. Refer to IRM 184.108.40.206.4.
To strengthen administrative control, the facts and circumstances determine the appropriate letter to issue with the examination report.
Refer to Exhibit 4.24.10-1, Excise Tax Letter Chart - Letter Chart According to Situation, which identifies those letters that are appropriate to issue to the taxpayer depending on the facts and circumstances.
Refer to Exhibit 4.24.10-2, Excise Tax - Letter Numbers and Descriptions, which lists the letters found in Exhibit 4.24.10-1.
Generally, Appeals procedures for unagreed income tax cases are applicable to excise cases, with the exception of the statutory notice provisions, which do not apply.
If the taxpayer requests a review of the case findings by Appeals as a result of the issuance of a 30 Day Letter, the IRS must abide by that request, if certain requirements are satisfied:
There must be at least 365 days remaining on the SOL at the time Appeals receives the case.
Under the Appeals process, the excise examiner may document whether the taxpayer provided or confirmed the requested information. If the taxpayer later discovers further or additional information he or she wants considered, that information may be provided or confirmed for an impartial, independent review.
A request for an appeal may be made using small case procedures if the total amount of proposed additions to tax and penalties, proposed overassessment, or claimed refund, credit or abatement for each tax period is $25,000 or less. These procedures require a written request stating the issues and grounds for the disagreement for Appeals consideration.
If the taxpayer does not qualify for the small case procedures, a formal protest must be prepared by the taxpayer and/or the taxpayer’s representative.
Formal protests are reviewed at the group level, as designated by management, within seven days of receipt to decide whether:
The protest is adequate.
The case requires further development by the excise examiner.
The examination report should be modified.
The taxpayer’s written protest includes the required documents.
A rebuttal needs to be prepared.
The taxpayer’s formal protest must include the following:
The taxpayer’s name, address and daytime telephone number.
A statement that the taxpayer wants to appeal the excise examiner’s findings to Appeals.
A copy of the letter showing the proposed changes and findings being protested/disputed, or the date and symbols of the letter.
The tax periods or years involved.
A list of the adjustments with which the taxpayer disagrees and an explanation as to why.
A statement of facts supporting the taxpayer’s position on any contested issue.
The law or other authority the taxpayer relies upon, if any.
A declaration of truth under penalties of perjury. This may be done by adding the following signed declaration to the protest document: “Under the penalties of perjury, I declare that I examined the facts stated in this protest, including any accompanying documents, and, to the best of my knowledge and belief, they are true, correct, and complete.”
If the taxpayer’s representative submits the protest for the taxpayer, the representative must substitute a declaration stating:
That the representative submitted the protest and accompanying documents.
Whether the representative knows personally that the facts stated in the protest and accompanying documents are true and correct.
An incomplete protest must be returned to the taxpayer and additional time granted to perfect the document. If the protest contains information warranting further consideration, the case should be returned to the excise examiner for further development. Cases returned for additional development should be considered priority work and given expedited consideration. If the excise examiner or excise manager determines there is something wrong in the protest that does not change the determination but requires further comment or explanation and is not confidential in nature, a rebuttal can be prepared and included in the case file before being sent to Appeals. If a rebuttal is prepared, a copy must be provided to the taxpayer.
The excise manager is authorized to meet with the taxpayer to discuss any disputed issues in an attempt to resolve them, obtain taxpayer agreement and limit taxpayer burden.
Managerial involvement is required for all unagreed cases. A written statement must be in the case file containing evidence of the excise manager’s involvement in the unagreed case and the attempts made to resolve the disputed issue(s).
If the taxpayer requests a transfer of jurisdiction for an appeal, and the written protest is complete, the case file will be routed to Appeals.
A case can be transferred to Appeals with a copy of the taxpayer’s return, if:
A transcript of account is attached to the copy of the return.
The case does not involve fraud, jeopardy assessment, or JC Review.
Disposal Code 07 must be used for an unagreed case that is transferred to Appeals.
Letter 2280-X, Transfer to Appeals, must be prepared, signed and dated by the excise manager. Letter 2280-X notifies the taxpayer of the case transfer to Appeals for consideration. If a rebuttal is prepared, it must be sent to the taxpayer with Letter 2280-X.
Requests from Appeals for additional information for further verification of facts in a protested case will be completed expeditiously.
Refer to IRM 220.127.116.11.6, Report Writing, Taxpayer’s Appeal Rights, for appeal rights for inadequate taxpayer records cases.
Refer to IRM 8.7.10, Technical and Procedural Guidelines, Excise Taxes and IRA Adjustments, for more information on Appeals procedures for excise cases.
If Appeals cannot resolve the case to the taxpayer’s satisfaction, the taxpayer’s only recourse will be paying the additional tax when assessed and filing a claim for refund within the applicable SOL. Upon disallowance of the claim or six months from the date the claim was filed, the taxpayer may then file suit in the U.S. District Court or the U.S. Court of Federal Claims to recover the tax paid.
Appeals has specially trained Appeals Officers (AOs) who handle excise tax and dyed diesel penalty cases referred to Appeals. For information about using the spreadsheet tool to obtain the proper address to route a case to Appeals refer first to the Appeals Home Page at http://appeals.web.irs.gov/APS/caserouting.htm, then refer to Case Routing Addresses and Instructions at https://organization.ds.irsnet.gov/sites/AppealsCOS/APS/SitePages/CaseRouting.aspx.
All unagreed excise cases are routed to Appeals via Tech Services.
In the “Forward to Technical Services” section of Form 3198, Special Handling Notice for Examination Case Processing, the boxes “Unagreed to Appeals” and “Other” must be checked.
In the “Other” section, the excise examiner will enter the address of the Appeals office based on the information provided by utilizing the Spreadsheet Tool found on the Appeals webpage.
Rev. Proc. 2012-18, Ex Parte Communications Between Appeals and Other Internal Revenue Service Employees, and IRM 8.1.10, Appeals Function, Ex Parte Communications, provide guidance regarding the prohibition of ex parte communications between AOs and other IRS employees, to the extent that those communications appear to compromise the independence of the AOs. An ex parte communication is a communication that takes place between any Appeals employee (e.g., AOs, Settlement Officers, Appeals Case Team Leaders, or Appeals Tax Computation Specialists) and employees of other IRS functions, without the taxpayer or taxpayer’s representative being given an opportunity to participate in the communication. Ex parte communications may include oral and written forms of communication. Written communications include those that are generated manually or electronically. If a communication is a prohibited ex parte communication, the taxpayer or the taxpayer’s representative must be given an opportunity to participate in that communication.
Not all communications are within the scope of the term ex parte communication. To determine whether a communication is an ex parte communication, see the guidelines set forth in IRM 8.1.10.
The prohibition on ex parte communications applies to preconference meetings between Appeals and Excise Tax Examination. According to Rev. Proc. 2012-18, a preconference meeting could appear to compromise the independence of Appeals. Consequently, Appeals will hold a preconference meeting only after giving the taxpayer or the taxpayer’s representative an opportunity to participate.
After giving the taxpayer or the taxpayer’s representative an opportunity to participate, a preconference meeting may be held between the AO and the excise examiner. This may be about a protested case addressing an unusual or complex issue. A determination regarding what is an unusual or complex issue will be left to the discretion of the AO and the excise examiner.
The purpose of a preconference meeting is to discuss the issue, the protest and the written rebuttal in a case containing a complex or unusual issue. A frank discussion of the issue will help to identify additional information that may be needed on the issue. The need for resources, specialists, or expert witnesses, etc. can be discussed at this preconference meeting. Excise Tax Examination is encouraged to share its views on disputed issues, including the assessment of the facts and the law to recommended adjustments on a particular issue. However, the preconference meeting is not for securing a commitment from Appeals to defend a particular issue or settlement position, or otherwise negotiate the settlement posture of Appeals on a case.
A preconference meeting will take place prior to an Appeals/taxpayer conference.
If a preconference meeting is requested by the excise examiner and/or the excise manager, the request should accompany the case file when sent to Appeals. The request must be conveyed in a written memorandum and signed by the excise manager and must be associated with the case file. .
Review of taxpayer’s formal protest and preparation of the rebuttal in non-docketed cases:
Before forwarding the case to Appeals, the excise examiner must review any new information, new issue or new arguments raised by the taxpayer or the taxpayer’s representative in the protest to determine Excise Tax Examination's position before preparing a written rebuttal. The rebuttal is not intended to restate positions taken in the examination report, but to address any new information or new issues raised in the protest. A copy of the excise examiners’s rebuttal will be provided to the taxpayer and/or the taxpayer’s representative before sending the case to Appeals for consideration.
The protest rebuttal shall reference the request for a preconference meeting and refer to the separate request memorandum from the excise manager. This will alert the AO to look for the preconference meeting request memorandum.
Factual differences between the examination report and the protest will be reconciled. Rebuttals will be secured from specialists, such as engineers, economists, appraisers, etc., who provided background data, assumptions, etc. used to formulate Excise Tax Examination's position. These reports will be included in the administrative file with the protest and provided to the taxpayer or representative before sending the case to Appeals for consideration.
Excise Tax Examination will seek technical advice on a novel or unique issue prior to Appeals’ consideration.
Changes in the excise examiner’s and the excise manager’s position made during the review process will be reflected clearly in any revised report and will include any tax re-computations.
The excise examiner should not wait until the taxpayer disagrees to secure technical advice or reports from specialists to prepare for the preconference meeting. Doing so might delay the taxpayer’s appeal and limit the time the taxpayer has to respond. If the excise examiner has such information that addresses the taxpayer’s arguments, the information must be provided to the taxpayer with the 30 Day Letter, to assist the taxpayer in the decision of whether to retain an expert or professional to prepare a rebuttal.
If a preconference meeting initiated by either party is accepted by the other party, the acceptance need not be in writing, but the acceptance should be communicated expeditiously to the other party.
A request by either party shall address the unusual or complex factual or legal issue warranting the preconference.
Either the AO or excise examiner can decline the preconference meeting request. The declination must be in writing and signed and conveyed to the other party with copies to respective managers.
Despite these preconference meeting procedures, the AO remains responsible for complying with the SOL procedures outlined in IRM 8.21, Appeals Statute Responsibility.
Participation in a preconference meeting:
The AO will arrange the meeting
Appeals and Excise Tax Examination will each identify its participants in the meeting
The participants may include other specialists, as deemed necessary by Excise Tax Examination
The parties will determine the location and method of the preconference on a case-by-case basis
SB/SE and Appeals Fast Track Settlement (FTS) is a jointly administered program offered by the IRS to expedite case resolution at the earliest opportunity. FTS enables taxpayers and the IRS to work together in resolving disputed issues while the case remains in SB/SE jurisdiction. FTS is designed to streamline the settlement process of excise cases because the taxpayer, taxpayer’s representative, excise examiner, excise manager and Appeals mediator participate actively in the outcome. Excise Tax Examination brings its expertise in tax law and specific knowledge of the case to the FTS session and plays an important role in the process of advocating the IRS’s position. Refer to IRM 8.26.2, Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) Program, Fast Track Settlement for Small Business/Self Employed (SB/SE) Taxpayers.
FTS is an expansion of the taxpayer dispute resolution options and does not eliminate or replace other resolution options. A taxpayer who disagrees with proposed adjustments will also be informed of his or her right to the following:
Discuss the proposal with the excise manager in a manager’s conference.
Request a conference with Appeals.
Pay a deficiency and file a claim for refund or file a protective claim for refund.
Information about FTS is available at the FTS web site at http://mysbse.web.irs.gov/examination/tip/fts/default.aspx.
Under FTS, the AO has the authority to settle a FTS case in consideration of hazards of litigation, and the ex parte communication rules do not apply.
The prohibition against ex parte communications between AOs and other IRS employees provided by Section 1001(a) of the Restructuring and Reform Act of 1998 (RRA ‘98) does not apply to communications arising in the FTS process because the Appeals personnel are facilitating an agreement between the taxpayer and Excise Tax Examination and are not acting in their traditional Appeals’ settlement role. Refer to Rev. Proc. 2012-18 for additional guidance on ex parte communications.
The FTS process is confidential with respect to all parties, pursuant to IRC 6103,Confidentially and disclosure of returns and return information. Therefore, all information concerning dispute resolution communication is confidential and may not be disclosed by any party except as provided by statute.
The excise examiner should discuss appeal rights, including alternative dispute resolution, with the taxpayer during the first interview/contact to ensure the taxpayer understands his or her options. The excise examiner should also revisit the FTS option with the taxpayer when the examination is reaching its final stages and the taxpayer does not agree with the examination’s findings and issues. Refer to IRM 8.26.2.
Completion of the FTS process is estimated as within 60 days.
Before FTS is offered as an option to the taxpayer, the excise examiner must establish eligibility. The excise examiner should discuss potential issue(s) and any questions about the application with the excise manager prior to offering FTS to the taxpayer.
SB/SE FTS is generally available for all non-docketed SB/SE cases with no regard to dollar amount. However, there are cases excluded from FTS.
Examples of cases that do not qualify for FTS include the following:
Cases with numerous issues, whether simple or complex, which will require longer than 60 days to resolve.
Cases where SB/SE or the taxpayer is unable to meet during the 60 day timeframe.
High profile, sensitive taxpayers or issues.
No-Show cases (i.e., taxpayers who failed to respond to IRS communications and no documentation was submitted for consideration).
If the excise examiner and excise manager determine that a taxpayer’s request for SB/SE FTS is ineligible as excluded from FTS, the reasons for ineligibility must be explained to the taxpayer in writing.
If one issue in a case is determined to be ineligible for SB/SE FTS, all issues in the case are deemed ineligible.
Taxpayer requests for FTS that are denied by the excise manager, other than excluded cases, require review and concurrence by the Excise Tax Examination territory manager. A decision by the territory manager not to accept a case into FTS is final. The taxpayer will be notified of any such denial by SB/SE.
All unagreed issues must be developed fully prior to being accepted into the FTS program. A case is considered developed fully when:
The case can be written up as unagreed with a 30 Day Letter.
Includes basis in fact and/or law for the conclusion(s) reached.
All issues are defined.
Lead sheets and workpapers supporting the excise examiner’s position are documented properly. Facts, procedures, audit techniques, management involvement, applicable law, conclusions and adjustments are documented fully.
All referrals and reports/recommendations necessary to such referrals are generated.
The excise manager’s review is completed. .
Before offering a taxpayer FTS, the excise examiner and excise manager should offer an SB/SE manager’s conference. If the taxpayer declines the SB/SE manager’s conference, the following actions must be taken:
Document the case file with the reasons why the taxpayer declined the conference.
Inform the taxpayer he or she can still apply for FTS and the excise manager will be present at the FTS session, if the application is accepted.
The excise examiner should provide Pub 5022, Fast Track Settlement - A Process for Prompt Resolution of SB/SE Tax Issues, upon determining a case is eligible for FTS and unagreed issues are present.
The excise examiner and excise manager may contact the Appeals Team Manager (ATM) for assistance in determining eligibility.
To request FTS, see IRM 18.104.22.168.5, Issue Resolution, SB/SE Fast Track Settlement.
See IRM 22.214.171.124,Initiating SB/SE FTS.
Cases using FTS remain in SB/SE jurisdiction. Do not transfer the full case file to Appeals.
Refer to the procedures in IRM 126.96.36.199.5.1, Determining Eligibility, and IRM 188.8.131.52, Determining Case Eligibility.
Once the case is approved and assigned to Appeals for FTS, the excise examiner updates the case to status code 15 and apply aging reason code 23. Upon completion of the FTS session, the excise examiner should return the case to status code 12.
The excise examiner must bring the case file, workpapers, a copy of the SB/SE FTS application package, computer, and a printer to the FTS session.
Form 14000, Fast Track Session Report, is required on all FTS cases. Form 14000 is an administrative document that assists Appeals in the planning and administration of the FTS session. Form 14000 provides a summary of all disputed issues, amounts in dispute, relevant conference dates and the final disposition.
Excise Tax Examination participates in the FTS process along with the taxpayer and Appeals. The FTS Appeals Official may propose settlement terms for any or all issues. The settlement proposal must be mutually agreed upon by both the taxpayer and Excise Tax Examination. Neither party is obligated to accept the settlement proposal offered by Appeals. The FTS session may include sessions with all parties and/or separate meetings as appropriate. The Appeals Official will use various methods and mediation techniques to meet the needs and circumstances of each particular case.
Appeals. leads the FTS session. Appeals does not act in its traditional Appeals role, but uses an interest-based approach to facilitate a settlement of the issues between the parties. Using mediation techniques, Appeals attempts to bring the parties to a mutual resolution of the issues during the FTS session.
If the taxpayer and/or Excise Tax Examination presents new information related to the issues in dispute, the Appeals Official will consider postponing or terminating the session until both parties have had adequate time to review and evaluate it.
If the parties are unable to resolve an issue, the taxpayer will retain all of the standard appeal rights and Excise Tax Examination will close the case as unagreed. When Appeals receives an unagreed case after an FTS session, Appeals assigns it to a different AO.
The parties retain the right to withdraw from FTS throughout the entire process.
A party wishing to withdraw or terminate should provide written notice to the Appeals Official and the other party as described in IRM 184.108.40.206.3, Withdrawal from SB/SE FTS.
Refer to IRM 220.127.116.11.5.5, FTS Closing Procedures, for more information.
If the parties resolve the issues brought forth through the FTS process and the excise manager or territory manager agrees with the settlement, Appeals will prepare and execute the appropriate agreement form and a brief Appeals Case Memorandum (ACM). Once the disputed issues are resolved or it is decided that a resolution cannot be reached; the Appeals Official solicits signatures of the taxpayer, the taxpayer’s representative (if applicable), the excise examiner and the excise manager who participated in the FTS session on Form 14000 . Both parties are given a copy of this report and are advised that the settlement is not final until the necessary closing documents or waivers are signed.
The AO forwards the FTS Closing Package to Excise Tax Examination using Form 3210, Document Transmittal. Refer to IRM 18.104.22.168.2, SB/SE FTS Closing Package, for a complete listing of the documents contained in the FTS Closing Package. Excise Tax Examination secures appropriate closing documents from the taxpayer and closes the case using standard procedures.
IRM 8.13.1, Closing Agreements, Processing Closing Agreements in Appeals, contains information and instructions regarding closing agreements under IRC 7121 for all types of taxes.
The United States Tax Court has no jurisdiction over cases involving the excise taxes reported on Form 720, Quarterly Federal Excise Tax Return, Form 2290, Heavy Highway Vehicle Use Tax Return, Form 730, Monthly Tax Return for Wagers, and Form 11-C, Occupational Tax and Registration Return for Wagering. These cases may be litigated in either the United States District Court or the United States Court of Federal Claims after payment of the tax by filing a suit for refund of the tax paid.
Appeals' uses of the Issue Management System (IMS) are mandatory for working excise tax cases and will upload the feedback documents (Form 5402, Appeals Transmittal and Case Memo, ACM and computations) to IMS instead of sending them to the LB&I Outlook mailbox.
Excise Tax Policy monitors the mailbox for receipt of Form 5402 and the ACM.
Excise Tax Policy monitors the status of all unagreed excise cases in Appeals and follow-up on settled cases where Form 5402 and the ACM have not been received in the mailbox.
Upon receipt of an ACM in the mailbox, Excise Tax Policy sends the ACM along with a brief summary of the issue via encrypted e-mail to the territory manager in the territory where the case originated.
Within 30 days of receipt of the ACM, Excise Tax Policy Subject Matter Experts (SMEs) review the ACM and advise the Chief, Excise Tax Examination, territory manager and excise manager responsible for the examination, if they agree or disagree with the Appeals settlement. If there is a disagreement with how the case was resolved/disposed, Excise Tax Policy will provide feedback to Appeals either informally or through the formal dissent procedures. Formal dissent procedures are found in IRM 22.214.171.124.9, Conference and Settlement Practice, Reaching Settlement and Securing an Appeals Agreement Form, Disagreements to Appeals Determinations. The formal dissent procedures are not intended to replace any informal procedures currently in use. It is expected that Excise Tax Examination and Appeals will continue to address and resolve disagreements over case resolutions at the lowest possible level. The formal dissent procedures are used when the informal process results in Excise Tax Examination continuing to have unresolved and significant concerns about the Appeals disposition of an issue.
Dissents are prepared by Excise Tax Policy and forwarded to the appropriate Appeals area director, through the Program Manager, Excise Tax Policy within 90 days (extensions may be mutually agreed upon) of receipt by Excise Tax Examination of an ACM. See IRM 126.96.36.199.9 for detailed dissent routing guidance. Excise Tax Policy and Appeals may also hold post settlement conferences. The purpose of the post settlement conference is to discuss the settlement reached and its subsequent impact on the taxpayer. The post settlement conference is not intended to be a critique of the settlement nor is it intended to replace dissent procedures.
An Excise Tax Policy Analyst will prepare monthly reports for the Program Manager, Excise Tax Policy covering areas such as those issues sustained, SME responses to the ACM, formal dissents issued and responses to the dissents, premature referrals and emerging issues/trends.
|TP is eligible for Appeals||Statute ≥ 240 days|| |
|TP is eligible for Appeals||Statute > 240 days|| |
| Previously Sent ||TP indicated he/she is going to send in a protest but has not yet responded|| |
| Previously Sent ||Inadequate protest received and/or Letter 907-X has been sent|| |
| Previously Sent ||TP sends in additional info|| |
| Previously Sent ||TP requests an extension to respond to 30 Day Letter|| |
|Case is closed to Appeals||Rebuttal prepared|| |
|Case is closed to Appeals||Rebuttal not prepared|| |
|Letter 569-X||Claim Disallowance Letter|
|Letter 686||Extension of Time for Certain Actions|
|Letter 692-A||Request for Consideration of Additional Findings (Claim)|
|Letter 692-E||Excise Tax - Request for Consideration of Additional Findings|
|Letter 907-X||Request to Extend Assessment Statute Letter|
|Letter 923-C||Letter Extending Time to File - (Claim)|
|Letter 923-E||Letter Extending Time to File Protest|
|Letter 950-E||30 Day Letter - Straight Deficiency or Overassessment for Excise Examination Cases|
|Letter 1025-A||Letter of Protest (Claims)|
|Letter 1025-E||Letter of Protest - Excise Tax|
|Letter 2280-X||Transfer to Appeals|
|Letter 5153-A||Examination Report Transmittal - Statute Less Than 240 Days (Claim)|
|Letter 5153-E||Examination Report Transmittal - Statute|