- 4.31.8 TEFRA and NonTEFRA Examinations - Campus Identity Theft (IDT) Procedures
- 184.108.40.206 TEFRA Identity Theft IDT Overview
- 220.127.116.11 Procedures for All TEFRA Cases
- 18.104.22.168 Statutes Expiring Within 120 Days or Less
- 22.214.171.124 Procedures for Identity Theft TEFRA IDT Examiner Procedures
- 126.96.36.199 Procedures for IMF Individual Master File Accounts
- 188.8.131.52.1 Controls
- 184.108.40.206.2 Multiple Function Controls
- 220.127.116.11.3 Reporting Time
- 18.104.22.168.4 Telephone Contacts
- 22.214.171.124 Procedures for BMF Business Master File Accounts
- 126.96.36.199 Pending Claim Procedures
- 188.8.131.52.1 Allegations during Telephone Calls
- 184.108.40.206.2 Unsubstantiated or Incomplete Identity Theft Claims
- 220.127.116.11.3 No Response to Telephone Call or Letter 5064C
- 18.104.22.168 IRS Identified Identify Theft
- 22.214.171.124 Substantiation Documentation Received
- 126.96.36.199 Complete Account Analysis
- 188.8.131.52 Invalid Identity Theft Determinations
- 184.108.40.206 Valid Identity Theft Determinations
- 220.127.116.11 Screening for Nullity Returns
- 18.104.22.168 Unprocessed Returns
- 22.214.171.124 Referrals to IDTVA-C
- 126.96.36.199 Referrals from Taxpayer Advocate Service (TAS)
- 188.8.131.52 Referrals from Accounts Management
- 184.108.40.206.1 Responsibilities of TEFRA ITAR Liaisons
- 220.127.116.11.2 Identity Theft Assistance Request (ITAR) Examiner Procedures
- 18.104.22.168.3 TEFRA Initiated ITARs
- 22.214.171.124.4 AM IPSU Form 14027-B, Identity Theft Case Referrals
- 126.96.36.199.5 Responsibilities of the TEFRA Identity Theft Liaison (ITL)
- 188.8.131.52.6 Form 14027-B, Identity Theft Case Referral, Examiner Procedures
- 184.108.40.206 Special Procedures
- 220.127.116.11 Statute Protection
Part 4. Examining Process
Chapter 31. Pass-Through Entity Handbook
Section 8. TEFRA and NonTEFRA Examinations - Campus Identity Theft (IDT) Procedures
April 04, 2017
(1) This transmits a revised IRM 4.31.8, Pass-Through Entity Handbook, TEFRA and NonTEFRA Examinations - Campus Identity Theft Procedures.
(1) Various editorial changes made throughout the IRM.
(2) Updated IRM cites throughout IRM from IRM 10.5 to IRM 25.23.
(3) IRM 18.104.22.168 - Referrals to IDTVA-C. New section to address change from Designated Identity Theft Adjustment (DITA) to Identity Theft Victim Assistance – Compliance (IDTVA-C).
Director, Field and Campus Policy
Small Business Self Employed
This section explains the campus TEFRA procedures necessary for working identity theft cases.
IRM 25.23, Identity Protection and Victim Assistance, provides service wide guidance on identity theft issues. Refer to IRM 25.23, Identity protection and Victim Assistance, for all information and guidance regarding documentation and actions required for processing Identity Theft (IDT) claims.
This IRM 4.31.8, TEFRA Identity Theft, will provide the TEFRA functional guidance.
It is important to understand the distinction between tax-related and non-tax related identity theft when considering identity theft issues. Taxpayers with tax-related identity theft issues should be asked to provide evidence of identity theft and documentation to authenticate identity.
Victims are encouraged to report instances of known identity theft to appropriate federal agencies. See IRM 22.214.171.124, Taxpayer Interaction.
The Service implemented identity theft indicators to facilitate case identification and processing. It is important to understand these Identity Theft Indicators.
Initial Allegation/Suspicion of Identity Theft - The identity theft indicator alerts others that a claim of identity theft has been reported. Refer to IRM 126.96.36.199, Initial Allegation, or Suspicion of Tax-Related identity Theft - Identity Theft Indicators.
Taxpayer Provided Identity Theft Documents - The identity theft indicator alerts others that a claim of identity theft has been substantiated. Refer to IRM 188.8.131.52.3, Marking Taxpayer Accounts When Accepting Identity Theft Supporting Documents.
Closing an Identity Theft Claim - The identity theft tracking indicator alerts others that a claim of identity theft was resolved. Refer to Refer to IRM 184.108.40.206.1, Closing Taxpayer Initiated Identity Theft Affecting Tax Administration - TC 971 AC 501, , and IRM 25.23.2-8, IMF Only TC 971 AC 506 — IRS Determined Tax-Related Identity Theft Case Closure.
Identity theft can be initiated by the taxpayer, where by Form 14039, IDT Affidavit, was submitted by mail or fax.
In many instances, identity theft incidents will be resolved prior to reaching TEFRA.
If a taxpayer alleges identity theft or an employee suspects identity theft, the case should be reviewed on the Integrated Data Retrieval System (IDRS) via command codes ENMOD or IMFOL with definer “E” to determine whether IDT has previously been identified and corrected or if there is an unresolved identity theft issue.
If the identity theft issue has been resolved, there are no other actions needed on the identity theft issue, continue to process case following normal procedures.
If the identity theft issue is unresolved, refer to the TEFRA IDT Coordinator. The chart below can be used as a reference. See IRM 25.23, Identity Protection and Victim Assistance, for a complete list of IDT actions codes (AC) used with Transaction Code (TC) 971 and the table below to make a determination.
TC 971 Action Code If Then 501
• Taxpayer Self-Identified
• Impacting Tax Administration
• Taxpayer provided required ID theft documentation
• Case resolution complete
• TC 971 AC 501 must be for the same year as TEFRA issue
• No Action
• Continue processing
• Taxpayer Self-Identified
• NOT Impacting Tax Administration
• TC 971 AC 504 must be for the same year as TEFRA issue
• No Action
• Continue processing
• IRS Identified
• Impacting Tax Administration
• TC 971 AC 506 must be for the same year as TEFRA issue
• No Action
• Continue processing
• Identify theft claim has been made.
• Pending Claim of Identity Theft
• TC 971 AC 522 must be for the same year as TEFRA issue
• Refer to TEFRA IDT Coordinator
• Locked account related to a deceased taxpayer(s) for persons with no filing requirement.
• Refer to TEFRA IDT Coordinator
When no action is required, because the Identity Theft issue is resolved, continue to process cases per IRM 4.31.3, TEFRA Examinations – CTF Procedures, and IRM 4.31.6, Non-TEFRA Examinations – CTF Procedures.
During the TEFRA examination, if any correspondence is received from the taxpayer indicating ID Theft, not previously identified on the taxpayer’s account, refer the case to the TEFRA IDT Coordinator for determination of next action.
If the taxpayer indicates ID theft during a phone call, technicians should complete Form 4442, and route case(s) to the TEFRA IDT Coordinator for determination of next actions.
TEFRA cases with a “statute expiring within 120 days or less” (the period for assessment) require “Special Handling” in order to protect the legal assessment of tax. Any IDT follow up actions including but not limited to the following must be completed prior to the statute assessment date.
Expedite referrals to Identity Theft Victim Assistance – Compliance (IDTVA-C), for any IDT account adjustments.
Direct contact with any area reflecting an open IDT controls, see IRM 220.127.116.11.6.3.2, Research (R) Step 2 - Identifying Open or Unresolved Tax-Related Identity Theft Issues. See IDT Liaison listing on SERP, http://serp.enterprise.irs.gov/databases/who-where.dr/functional_id_theft.htm.
The IDT examiner will refer to IRM 18.104.22.168, Initial Allegation or Suspicion of Tax-Related identity Theft - Identity Theft Indicators, and IRM 22.214.171.124.3, Marking Taxpayer Accounts When Accepting Identity Theft Supporting Documents, to address TC 971 with action code 522.
IDT correspondence received in writing or telephonically, will be referred to the IDT examiner for resolution.
The TEFRA IDT coordinator will refer to IRM 25.23, Identity Protection and Victim Assistance, for all information and guidance regarding documentation and actions required for processing Identity Theft claims.
It is important to understand the distinction between “tax-related” and “non-tax related” identity theft when considering identity theft issues. Taxpayers with tax-related identity theft issues should be asked to provide evidence of identity theft and documentation to authenticate identity, IRM 126.96.36.199, Identity Theft Supporting Documentation.
Taxpayers may ask where to find additional information to protect themselves from identity theft. Refer to IRM 188.8.131.52, Taxpayer Interaction.
All cases identified as Identity Theft (IDT) will be worked as priority without unreasonable delay by the IDT Coordinators.
Pending claim indicators will be input within 3 business days of receipt of an allegation of IDT from a telephone call or correspondence receipt.
AIMS controls and TXMOD control bases will be input within 5 business days of receipt of the Form 14039 and substantiation documents.
Acknowledgment letter Letter 5064C will be issued to the victim within 30 days of receipt of the Form 14039 and substantiation documents in the function.
The determination will be made within 30 days of receipt of the Form 14039 and substantiation documents.
Do not update the name and/or address on Master File when the SSN owner submits an IDT claim or return. The name and/or address will be updated accordingly when the claim has been verified and the valid IDT determination made.
Any correspondence to the SSN owner prior to making the IDT determination will require manual input of the address information on the letter in RGS or IDRS.
The IDT Coordinator will make all necessary changes to the name and address in CEAS/RGS.
The IDT Coordinator will document RGS and AMS that the name and address were updated based upon the acceptance of the IDT claim.
Document all IDT actions on RGS workpapers and AMS in detail. Include all documents received, documents reviewed in the case file and considered in the IDT determination
Open AIMS cases – follow normal procedures for completing workpapers on assigned cases.
Closed AIMS– follow normal procedures for completing workpapers on closed assigned cases.
See IRM 184.108.40.206.5, Preparation of Partner Examination Report.
It is important to make a distinction between a Mixed Entity and/or Scrambled SSN problem and an actual IDT case. Do not confuse the issue of taxpayers having no knowledge of income earned or a return filed with an assumption they are a victim of IDT. Any cases that are determined to be mixed entity or scrambled SSN cases are referred to Accounts Management for account resolution.
At any time during the account review, if there is evidence the taxpayer has a filing requirement but has not filed a return, solicit and encourage the taxpayer for a signed return. This applies to any years reviewed and impacted by the IDT incident.
Do not confuse fraud schemes and IDT. If a taxpayer authorized a preparer to file a return, but the preparer added or inflated deductions or credits to obtain a larger refund without the taxpayer's knowledge, this is not IDT. This is considered preparer misconduct. When situations like this are encountered, the examiner needs to consider all the facts and circumstances of the case and refer to IDTVA-C. IRM 25.24.3, Return Preparer Misconduct - Compliance.
The campus that conducted the original examination will work the closed AIMS IDT cases. IDT claims for cases that were transferred to Appeals or Tax Court will be worked in Appeals. Transfer the IDT documents to the appropriate IDT Liaison; see ID Theft Liaisons located on SERP, http://serp.enterprise.irs.gov/databases/who-where.dr/functional_id_theft.htm
Powers of Attorney – Refer to IRM 220.127.116.11, Power of Attorney and Other Third Party Authorizations, IRM 21.3.7, Processing Third Party Authorizations onto the Centralized Authorization File (CAF), and IRM 4.11.55, Examining Officers Guide (EOG) - Power of Attorney Rights and Responsibilities, for additional information as well as the SERP IRM Supplement, Power of Attorney/Third Party Authorizations Toolkit. Add SERP link.
Controls must be placed on all accounts when IDT is alleged or documented by the taxpayer via telephone call, correspondence or referral and when the IDT determination is made.
Aging Reason Code (ARC) 14 is input for any open AIMS case. The ARC 14 remains on the AIMS record regardless of the taxpayer submitting the substantiation documentation or of the IDT determination.
Do not overlay ARC 14 with another ARC. ARC 14 will overlay all other ARC. See Campus Exam ARC AIMS Input tool for additional information.
IDRS control bases are input for all cases. Use Control Category Code “TPPI” for all TEFRA IDT controls. See the Compliance Specialized Team IDRS Controls tool for specific coding input. Input IDRS control bases when: an allegation of IDT is made or; when Form 14039 and documents are received or; when working AM or TAS referrals.
TC 971 AC 522 inputs are required to identify pending IDT claims and the IDT documents received for a specific tax year. See IRM 18.104.22.168.1, IMF Identity Theft- Taxpayer Initiated Allegations of Identity Theft - TC 971 AC 522 PNDCLM .
An IDT indicator is a TC 971 with an Activity Code 501, 504, 505, 506 or 522, 523, 524. For all cases, opened or closed on AIMS, prior to marking an account with TC 971 AC 522 PNDCLM or IRSID, research ENMOD/IMFOLE to ensure the account has not already been marked for the same tax year/incident. If the coding already exists do not input a second code for the same tax year/incident. See IRM 22.214.171.124, IMF Identity Theft Tracking Indicators - Taxpayer Initiated Allegation of Identity Theft - TC 971 AC 522 PNDCLM.
Uniform Employee Group Codes (EGC) are used to identify open AIMS IDT cases:
TEFRA cases –
5887 - IDT alleged by taxpayer per telephone call, correspondence or referral (per telephone call, correspondence, Letter 5064C issued, unsubstantiated referral, etc.).
5888 - IDT documents received.
Non TEFRA cases –
5487 - IDT alleged by taxpayer per telephone call, correspondence or referral (per telephone call, correspondence, Letter 5064C issued, unsubstantiated referral, etc.).
5488 - IDT documents received.
The following uniform Status codes are used for TEFRA IDT cases open on AIMS:
Status Definition 13 45-day suspense for response to Letter 5064C for additional IDT information; ESTAB requests; any suspense other than status 24 required prior to sending the referral to IDTVA-C or making the determination. 24 STN suspense 56 IDT claim or reply received any >90 potential IDT to Spec. Team for screening, case will be updated to EGC 5887
For closed AIMS or archived CEAS records retrieved, the History Notes should include a reference the case was a prior identity theft case using the following status codes:
7035 - In process IDT closed case.
7036 - Substantiated IDT cases - accepted and Exam action completed.
7037 - Unsubstantiated or IDT cases determined invalid and Exam action completed.
All Compliance functions cannot address or reverse an assessment made by another function. The matrix below outlines the function, the authority and where cases will be transferred.
Function Authority Transfers From Tax Court Address own assessments and Exam, AUR, ASFR Exam, AUR, ASFR, CSCO, ACSS, Field Collection Appeals Address own assessments and Exam, AUR, ASFR Exam, AUR, ASFR, CSCO, ACSS, Field Collection Exam (SB/SE Field Exam, SB/SE Corr Exam, and WI Corr Exam) Address own assessments and AUR, ASFR Exam, AUR, ASFR, CSCO, ACSS, Field Collection AUR (SB/SE AUR and WI AUR)
ASFR (SB/SE ASFR and WI ASFR)
Address own assessments AUR, CSCO, ACSS, Field Collection ASFR (SB/SE ASFR and WI ASFR) Address own assessments AUR, CSCO, ACSS, Field Collection CSCO Assessments not made Field Collection Assessments not made ACSS Address assessments made on original filing and amended return assessments in status 22/24
The function IDT or ITAR liaisons will be contacted to transfer the controls.
Time spent, by TEFRA IDT/SME Coordinators, on IDT duties should be charged as follows:
Case Type Function / Program Codes Open cases includes ITARS and TAS cases
7X7 – appropriate program code
717 – Examiners
737 – TCOs
747 - RAs
IDT Closed Cases includes ITARS and TAS cases 717–XXXXX
Individuals may call the IRS to report that their Social Security Number (SSN) or Individual Taxpayer Identification Number (ITIN) has been misused to obtain goods or services, to report other complaints of IDT, and/or to request protection of their tax account information.
Do not disclose information to the SSN owner about the account or return information related to the questionable return. Follow disclosure guidance provided in IRM 126.96.36.199, General Disclosure Guidelines, IRM 4.19.19, Examination Telephone Contacts, and IRM 188.8.131.52, Disclosure.
If there are IDT indicators on the account or once you believe you are speaking with a victim or a perpetrator of IDT, follow IRM 184.108.40.206.4, Additional Taxpayer Authentication, and IRM 220.127.116.11.5, Identity Theft.
On all IDT calls, document the call on RGS/CEAS and AMS, if available, to confirm the taxpayer was provided instructions on how to file an IDT claim.
Examiners need to use good communication skills and be empathetic to the caller when handling IDT calls. Follow procedures provided in the IRM 4.19.19, Examination Telephone Contacts, for general information on handling calls and specific IDT disclosure guidance. IRM 18.104.22.168, Communication Skills, provides additional service wide communication skill guidance.
IRM 25.23.9, BMF Identity Theft Processing, provides service wide guidance on BMF identity theft issues, including documentation and actions required for general processing of BMF IDT claims.
BMF accounts may include the following entity types: corporations, partnerships, estate, trust, exempt organization, or government entity.
Follow IRM 22.214.171.124, Procedures for IMF – Individual Master File Accounts, for functional guidance regarding controls, work paper documentation, acknowledgement, etc. unless noted otherwise below.
BMF IDT indicators are not applied until the IDT has been confirmed. Refer to IRM 126.96.36.199, BMF Identity Theft Research, and IRM 188.8.131.52.1, Allegation or Suspicion of BMF Identity Theft - TC 971 AC 522 IDTCLM
Follow normal controls until the IDT allegation has been verified. Once verified, open TXMOD controls using TPPI as the category code.
If the taxpayer does not prove identity theft, reverse all identity theft indicators. Refer to IRM 25.23.9-5, Reversing BMF Identity Theft Indicators - TC 972 AC 522. It is imperative that the BMF identity theft indicators are reversed when BMF identity theft did NOT occur or was not substantiated by the taxpayer.
Once all actions have been taken, remember to close the identity theft issue. Refer to IRM 184.108.40.206.3, Closing BMF Identity Theft Issues - TC 971 AC 522 CLSIDT.
A pending claim is when a taxpayer calls or corresponds with “I think I am a victim of IDT” or “I didn’t file this return” or similar statement, this may be considered an IDT allegation or pending claim. The IDT examiner is responsible for providing the taxpayer with the information necessary to file the IDT claim and for placing internal indicators to control the case for IDT.
Individuals not required to file a return may also be negatively impacted by IDT. For example, a caller may state the Social Security Administration (SSA) has reduced or stopped their Social Security benefits based on a tax return filed with the IRS. Advise the callers to obtain the acceptable IDT documentation and attach to the TEFRA notice or letter they received.
For all cases when an allegation is received, refer to IRM 220.127.116.11.1(3), Controls, for the actions required.
If the taxpayer account is in debit balance (BAL due) and in MF (Collection) status 20, 56, or 58, input TC 470 using the IAT REQ77 tool.
Once the allegation is received, the IDT examiner will ensure the AMS updates are completed. If unable to contact the taxpayer by telephone, issue a Letter 5064C, using the IAT Letters tool, informing the taxpayer of the IDT requirements and process if applicable. See IRM 18.104.22.168.2, Unsubstantiated or Incomplete Identity Theft Claims, for specific procedures.
Cases in AIMS status 24 are not updated to status 13 and the 45-day suspense will run concurrently with the 90-day suspense period. The status 24 suspense date is only adjusted if the 45 days ends after the 90-day suspense date.
If no reply after 45 days, the case is updated out of the applicable IDT EGC and returned to normal case processing. The AIMS Aging Reason Code (ARC) 14 will remain on the AIMS record.
If the allegation is based on a call, the assistor is responsible for inputting a note as follows:
If the case is open on AIMS input a note to alert the IDT examiner to input IDT controls on the case.
If the case is closed on AIMS input a non-action note. Print the CEAS note and forward to your IDT Liaison for action.
When a referral or correspondence from the taxpayer indicates they may be a victim of IDT but, no Form 14039 or authentication documentation was provided, research CC ENMOD/IMFOLE to determine if documentation is required from the taxpayer.
If And Then No Form 14039 or authentication documentation A posted/unreversed TC 971 AC 501/ 506 or TC 971 AC 522 Source Code IRSID, INCOME, MULTFL, INCMUL, NOFR, or OTHER, and
1. The posted transaction falls within the three year period (calendar year) and
2. The allegation relates to a previously reported incident as described in IRM 22.214.171.124.3, Closing BMF Identity Theft Issues - TC 971 AC 522 CLSIDT.
Continue with processing the case as a valid IDT claim. No Form 14039 or authentication documentation No IDT indicators or no indicators within 3 years on CC ENMOD/IMFOLE Notify the taxpayer of the requirements for filing an IDT claim by telephone or issue Letter 5064C. See Letter 5064C Input for suggested Letter 5064C fill-in paragraphs.
Process the case as a pending IDT claim. See IRM 126.96.36.199 , Pending Claims Procedures, above.
For closed AIMS cases, verify the original examination was conducted at your PBC. If so, follow the table above. If not, the IDT Liaison will forward to the appropriate TEFRA campus IDT Liaison.
If there is no response to phone call or Letter 5064C after 45 days,
Open AIMS cases - Continue regular TEFRA processing and move the case to the next step or continue the status 24 90-day suspension. Follow procedures in IRM 188.8.131.52.1, Controls.
Closed AIMS cases - Input CEAS Action Text “NOREPLY” and re-archive the CEAS record in status 7037. Follow procedures in IRM 184.108.40.206.1, Controls. Input CC TC 472 to resume the collection process.
There are times when the IRS will identify a taxpayer is a victim of IDT. Cases in this category will be processed following the guidance in IRM 220.127.116.11.4, IRS Identified Identity Theft.
An examiner may recognize IDT while researching a case, with or without a response from the taxpayer. When this occurs, the IDT determination may be made without contacting the taxpayer to provide Form 14039 and substantiation documentation.
The following are common indicators that may lead to an IRS-identified IDT determination. This is not an all-inclusive list:
TC 610, 640 or 670 payments on accounts with refund return filed and late filed bal. due return posted as TC 976,
TC 460 extension to file requests with timely (early) filed refund return accounts, or
Returns with filing pattern changes including different unrelated or deceased dependents.
When an indicator of potential IDT is found, follow the guidance provided in IRM 18.104.22.168, Complete Account Analysis, to make the determination.
If an IDT determination is made, place the required controls on all impacted tax years. The TC 971 AC 522 Tax Administration source code is IRSID.
Prepare Form 4442 according to IRM 22.214.171.124.1.25.2, IDT - General. When preparing Form 4442, in section B, indicate that TC 971 AC 506 is needed upon account resolution and issue Letter 4310C.
Once it is determined the documentation provided is complete and legible per IRM 126.96.36.199.1, Complete and Legible Documents, issue Letter 5064C to the taxpayer to acknowledge the receipt. Be sure to manually edit the address to the victim’s current information. See tool – Letter 5064CAcknowledgment.
Perform case research and analysis to determine whether the IDT claim is valid or invalid. See IRM 188.8.131.52, Complete Account Analysis.
Perform research to determine the impact of the IDT on all tax years. At a minimum, if applicable, review the 3 prior years and all subsequent tax years when analyzing the taxpayer accounts. The determination made will include resolution for all impacted years to make the taxpayer whole.
Do not assume that the taxpayer filing the IDT documentation is the true owner of the SSN. The employee who reviews the case must consider all information received and available through research to determine the legitimate taxpayer and resolve the case thoroughly and accurately.
Use all available research tools to determine the validity of the IDT claim. The following is a list of the common research tools available, this list is not all inclusive:
IDRS – review prior and subsequent years for filing status, address, dependents claimed, and Schedules A/B/C/D/E/F information for comparison to the TC 150 return and any subsequent returns submitted. CC IRPTR for payer documents may verify income, deductions, and address information reported. Bank routing and preparer information on CC TRDBV is useful. Other research command codes available are IMFOLE, INOLES, DDBKD, RTVUE, TRDBV, DFAST and FTBOLP.
RGS - Review workpapers, notes, and documents for all years available.
AMS/CIS notes or documents – review information posted by other IRS functions, if available
If additional clarification or information is needed, attempt to contact the taxpayer by telephone. If unable to reach the taxpayer, issue Letter 5064C to request the additional information.
While researching accounts, if a case has an F- freeze, obtain the necessary documentation and refer the case to the Frivolous Return Program (FRP) at the address below. Make a case copy before sending the return. The FRP team will make the IDT determination on these accounts.
Internal Revenue Service
Frivolous Return Program
1973 Rulon White Blvd., M/S 4450
Ogden, UT 84404
See IRM 184.108.40.206, Invalid Identity Theft Determinations.
Taxpayers have various appeal rights in regards to Compliance assessments. Taxpayers can request an Appeals hearing when there is a disagreement regarding a determination, petition the Tax Court, etc.
When cases are identified with an LW freeze, the taxpayer is requesting to go to Appeals or a case is received from Appeals. These cases must be worked in accordance with IRM 220.127.116.11, Requests for an Appeal.
Based on the IDT determination, input TC 971 AC 522 for all impacted tax years per IRM 18.104.22.168.3, Marking Taxpayer Accounts When Accepting Identity Theft Supporting Documents.
The determination and action required to adjust the account(s) will be documented and a referral package prepared for post function adjustment work. All IDT post function adjustment work is referred to the DITA. Refer to IRM 22.214.171.124, Referrals to IDTVA-C, for specific guidance.
Do not reverse any posted TEFRA adjustments on the account(s).
If the case is in AIMS status 24 and the statutory notice of deficiency cannot be stopped, follow the guidelines in IRM 126.96.36.199, Statutory Notices.
If there is a TC 976 or original return from the legitimate taxpayer, see IRM 188.8.131.52.10.4, Unprocessed Returns, for screening procedures.
Once the valid IDT determination is made, update Master File to reflect the legitimate taxpayer's current address.
To protect the taxpayer from collection activity while their account is referred to IDTVA-C for resolution, screen CC TXMODA.
If the taxpayer account is in debit balance (BAL due) and in MF (Collection) status 20, 56, or 58, input CC STAUP with no closing code.
Complete Form 14394, Identity Theft/Return Preparer Misconduct Case Collection Alert Form, if any of the following apply. See the Compliance Identity Theft Return Preparer Misconduct Case Collection Alert job aid for additional information:
Did the taxpayer indicate that they have an active levy against them?
Did the taxpayer indicate that the IRS filed a lien?
Is the case in or been in status 22, 24, or 26?
Is there a TC 582 that has not been reversed?
Is there a TC 971 with AC 060-FPLP, TC 971 AC 601-AKPFD or a TC 971 AC 600-SITLP?
Is there a TC 670 DPC 05 on the account?
If there is a TC 582 (lien indicator) posted and the IDT adjustment will result in a zero tax liability, prepare Form 13794, Request for Release, Partial Release, of Notice of Federal Tax Lien. Take the following actions in completing Form 13794:
Input as much information as possible regarding the abatement.
Include the Serial Lien Identification Number of the notice of the Federal Tax Lien, if available.
Check box 9 indicating “Erroneous Lien”
Include “ID Theft” in the “Reason” box
Fax or E-mail Form 13794 to the “Collection Advisory Unit” for the state where the taxpayer currently resides. Collection Advisory contacts can be found under the Who/Where tab on SERP Home Page as “Advisory Units Contact List”
Notate on the referral to IDTVA-C that Form 14394 was sent to ACS and/or Form 13794 was sent to Advisory or include a copy with the referral package indicating the date referred as applicable.
The Advisory Unit will review the Notices of Federal Lien (NFTL) filed against the taxpayer using the Automated Lien System (ALS). If all the modules on the NFTL are satisfied, Advisory will request the release of the NFTL as an erroneously filed NFTL per IRC 6326(b). The release of the NFTL will reverse the TC 582. The Advisory unit will abate the TC 360 associated with the NFTL filing and issue Letter 544, Letter of Apology - Erroneous Filing of Notice of Federal tax Lien, to the taxpayer.
If the taxpayer requests the NFTL be withdrawn, ask the taxpayer to complete Form 12277, Application for Withdrawal of Filed Form 668(Y), Notice of Federal Tax Lien (as based on IRC 6323(j)), or they may submit a written request for the withdrawal to the Advisory unit.
Advise the taxpayer to include an explanation regarding the abatement situation and noting the release of the NFTL, if that has taken place.
Inform the taxpayer the determination to grant such request will be made on a case-by-case basis by the Collection Advisory contacts. See IRM 184.108.40.206, Valid Identity Theft Determinations. For all cases, issue Letter 5064C to inform the legitimate taxpayer of the IDT determination and the pending account resolution.
If the determination is resolved as an income issue only, i.e., another taxpayer worked under the valid victim’s SSN, TEFRA will consider the taxpayer’s information. If it’s acceptable, adjust the examination report to eliminate the questionable income and complete the account resolution without referring to IDTVA-C.
Input TC 971 AC 501 with Tax Administration source code INCOME or TC 971 AC 506 with Tax Administration source code IRSID.
If needed, update the entity information for the correct address.
If open AIMS, continue with audit and notify the taxpayer of the changes to report with the appropriate letter.
If closed AIMS, input the ADJ54 to correct the account and notify the taxpayer of the changes to the report with Letter 4306.
Complete Form 9409, IRS/SSA Wages Worksheet, if any wage items are removed from the taxpayer’s report, unless the taxpayer has provided a Social Security Administration determination letter on the wage items in question. See IRM 220.127.116.11.7(22)(d), Responses Needing Further Action, for additional information and the SSA mailing address.
In instances where a valid return has been filed under someone else’s SSN, the return may need to be moved to an Internal Revenue Service Number (IRSN), i.e., someone is working under another’s SSN and files under the incorrect SSN. In this scenario, the return should be moved to an IRSN. Refer to IDTVA-C.
If And Then The examination is open No other exam issues
1. Adjust the report to remove the income.
2. Close the case DC 12 with no hold code or priority code.
3. Update Master File with the correct address information, if necessary.
4. Issue Letter 5064C to notify the taxpayer of the examination closure.
5. Input TC 971 AC 501 with the appropriate literals to indicate the account resolution for the ID theft incident.
The examination is open There are other exam issues
1. Adjust the report to remove the income.
2. Follow normal procedures to secure TP agreement or issue statutory notice of deficiency.
3. Notate the case to ensure the ARC 14 continues to control the record.
4. Update Master File with the correct address information, if necessary.
5. Input TC 971 AC 501/506 with the appropriate literals to indicate the account resolution for the IDT incident.
6. Issue Letter 5064C to notify the taxpayer of the IDT resolution, include paragraph V2.
7. When case is ready to close, the case should be closed with the appropriate disposal code: e.g., 03, 09, 10, etc., and the appropriate adjustment amounts recorded on the Form 5344 ( i.e., TC 30X amount credit reference adjustment amounts and penalties).
The examination is closed Income is the only issue
1. Prepare a revised report to remove the income.
2. Input CC ADJ54 to post the TC 291 adjustment.
3. Send Letter 4306 with a copy of the report to the taxpayer identifying the adjustments made due to their IDT claim.
4. Input TC 971 AC 501/506 with the appropriate literals to indicate the account resolution for the IDT incident.
If the Statutory Notice of Deficiency has been issued, a decision must be made whether to
Proceed with the IDT resolution prior to the 90th day to petition Tax Court date or
Rescind the notice or
Require the full 90-day suspension.
Issue the rescission documents to the legitimate taxpayer at the current address they provided.
The Assessment Statute Expiration Date (ASED) must be considered when making the rescission decision for all cases in status 24. If there are 180 days or less from a statute date, Form 872, Consent to Extend the Time to Asses Tax, must be executed to extend the statute. Follow procedures in IRM 18.104.22.168, Rescinding Notices of Deficiency.
Verify the normal TC 150 statute date; determine the number of days remaining on the TC 150 statute.
If a return was filed by the legitimate taxpayer, SSN owner, verify the received date and determine the number of days remaining on the statute. The return may be a TC 976 document or an original unprocessed signed return submitted with correspondence.
Use the earliest of the statute dates to determine if Form 872 is required.
If there are less than 31 days to the petition date, do not rescind the notice of deficiency. Allow the normal suspense period before following procedures in IRM 22.214.171.124.1.25.2, IDT - General.
Follow the table below to determine the case processing:
If And Then Status 24, TC 150 determined invalid No Filing Requirement and/or no subsequent return for the valid taxpayer SSN owner Follow procedures in IRM 126.96.36.199.3, Taxpayer Replies. Status 24, TC 150 determined invalid Filing Requirement, true Taxpayer responds or true Taxpayer filed (TC 976 or original unprocessed signed return received in TEFRA)
1. Rescind SNOD. Follow procedures in IRM 188.8.131.52, Rescinding Notices of Deficiency.
2. Once the rescission is executed, follow procedures in IRM 184.108.40.206.3, Taxpayer Replies.
If a filed return meets the criteria defined in IRM Exhibit 25.23.4-2, IRPTR/IDRS Data Decision Tree, it is considered false and deemed a nullity return. Nullity returns can also fall into the categories found in IRM 220.127.116.11.1 , Refund Scheme Listing.
If the return posted to the account, the nullity return will be reversed from the account without moving it to an Internal Revenue Service Number (IRSN) account. Any refund issued is manually moved to the Accounting 1545 ledger by IDTVA-C.
Instructions to IDTVA-C must state whether the return can be treated as a nullity with the applicable criteria or needs to be moved to an IRSN. Moving returns to an IRSN should be the exception, i.e. SSN owner lives/works in CA, income reported on return is valid per IRPTR for person living/working in Virginia and unable to locate a valid SSN or ITIN.
Compare the TC 150 return and any unprocessed returns to the IRPTR/IDRS Data Decision Tree to determine if nullity treatment applies. Exception to IRM Exhibit 25.23.4-2: Compliance will apply nullity screening to Schedule C returns. In order to nullify a return with Schedule C income, the entire refund has to be lost. If any portion of the refund is not lost and/or offset, the return cannot be nullified.
≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡
≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡
≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡
≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡
≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡
≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡
≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡
≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡
≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡
Once you’ve completed the nullity screening, continue completing the required IDT actions in the subsequent IRM sections.
Returns not processed as an original return have bypassed DIF scoring. These legitimate taxpayers’ unprocessed returns, whether numbered as TC 976/977 documents or received directly by TEFRA with correspondence, must be screened per IRM 18.104.22.168.23.6, DIF Score or CLASSIFICATION “Send Return(s) to Examination for Review”.
Unprocessed returns meeting the screening criteria in IRM 22.214.171.124.23.6, DIF Score or CLASSIFICATION “Send Return(s) to Examination for Review”, will be hand walked to the Tax Compliance Officers (TCOs) for priority classification. Local classifiers will expedite unprocessed returns received from TEFRA marked IDT. These returns will be classified within 3 business days.
If the unprocessed return is not selected for Examination, continue preparing the case for referral to IDTVA-C.
If an issue(s) on the return is selected for audit, the classifier will determine the portion of the refund attributable to the issue(s) and if it should be frozen. Issues normally worked pre-refund during normal pipeline processing (i.e. dependent, EITC, ACTC) will be frozen. The classifier will notate on the Form 6754, Examination Classification Check Sheet, the issue(s) and the frozen refund amount. The return will then be return to TEFRA to continue IDT processing.
For legitimate returns selected for examination, AIMS ARC, project code, and tracking code will be updated prior to the referral to IDTVA-C. The audit of the legitimate return will be conducted after the IDT return is removed from the account and legitimate return posted by IDTVA-C.
Update AIMS to ARC 95
Update the project code and tracking codes: DISC - 0275 with tracking code 0990 EITC - 1026 with tracking code 0990
Include in the instruction to IDTVA-C on Form 4442 to:
remove the TC 150 using nullity procedures if applicable,
process the legitimate taxpayer's return and
freeze any refundable credits.
If the unprocessed return meets the nullity criteria, that return is not processed. Annotate the work papers to document the criteria and determination for nullification. Continue preparing the case for referral to IDTVA-C to remove the TC 150 return.
If the unprocessed return meets the nullity criteria and the TC 150 return is the legitimate taxpayer's return:
Verify the Master File address is correct for the TC 150 taxpayer and update as needed.
Input TC 971 AC 501 with “OTHER”, the CP 01 will systemically generate to the legitimate taxpayer.
Continue the examination of the TC 150 return. AIMS ARC 14 and EGC 5077 will remain on the account through closure. The closure will require priority code 1 to release the TC 976/977.
If the amount was selected to examine the unprocessed return as a claim (source code 30), close the exam using DC 12 with priority code 1.
All Large Business and International (LB&I) and Small Business/Self-Employed (SB/SE) Compliance IDT referrals will be routed to the Identity Theft Victim Assistance – Compliance (IDTVA-C) team located in Brookhaven.
IDTVA will accept cases as outlined below:
Form 14039, Identity Theft Affidavit, or police report included with the correspondence.
Cases that do not have acceptable documentation if IDRS CC ENMOD contains:
i) Unreversed TC 971 AC 522 with the literals INCOME, MULTI, INCMUL, IRSID, NODOCRQ, NOFR or OTHER.
ii) Unreversed TC 971 AC 522 with the literal PNDCLM and there is a CIS Image of a Form 14039 or police report available on AMS.
iii) The remainder of the list only applies to cases that contain a response from the taxpayer if IDRS CC ENMOD contains:
• TC 971 AC 501 with the literals INCOME, MULTFL, INCMUL, NOFR, OTHER, DECD or PRISNR and the Identity Theft documentation has been received within the last three (3) years.
• TC 971 AC 506 with the literals INCOME, MULTFL, INCMUL, NOFR, OTHER, DECD or PRISNR
• TC 971 AC 504 with the literals ACCT, BOTH, NKI, EMPL
Cases that are Exam IRS identified IDT must have the following completed prior to referring:
i) Input TC 971 AC 522 PNDCLM if not already present.
ii) Document the factors for determining the IRS identified IDT on Correspondence Examination Automation System (CEAS) and in the History notes in Account Management System (AMS).
Upon receipt of the mail, do not update AIMS to a mail status or update the address on master file. The AIMS acknowledgement letter should not be issued to the address on Masterfile. This will prevent the AIMS acknowledgement from being issued to the perpetrator. IDTVA-C will acknowledge receipt of the IDT allegation upon receipt.4. Update open AIMS cases as follows:
Aging Reason Code (ARC) 14 is input for any open AIMS case.
Update AIMS to 56 status for cases where a Deficiency Notice has not been issued. If Deficiency Notice was issued, do not update, leave in status 24.
Update the Uniform Employee Group Codes (EGC) to identify open AIMS IDT cases to EGC 5066.
IDRS control bases are input for cases being referred.
i) Use Control Category Code IDI9 for all referrals.
ii) The IRS received date is the date of the original correspondence.
iii) Open in Status A
iv) Assign to IDRS number 0161899999.
Do not confuse fraud schemes and IDT. If a taxpayer authorized a preparer to file a return, but the preparer added or inflated deductions or credits to obtain a larger refund without the taxpayer's knowledge, this is not IDT. When situations like this are encountered, the examiner needs to consider all the facts and circumstances of the case and work them on a case by case basis.
For closed AIMS or archived CEAS records, retrieved the archived record, update to Status 7035. 7. For all referrals (open or closed AIMS) send the IDT documentation to the Brookhaven IDTVA Exam group for determination as follows:
IDTVA BSC, upon receipt of the IDT documentation, will update the IDRS controls to the employee number as follows:
0161800001 – open AIMS
0161800002 – Recons
0161800003 – SFR recons
IDTVA BSC will issue Letter 5064C to acknowledge receipt of the correspondence.
Once the case is reviewed and a determination is made, the case will be returned to the TEFRA unit. If the return is open on CEAS, action notes will be prepared. The case will be returned to the CTF with a Form 3210 and any necessary information needed to continue processing the case. Exam will close out AIMS if the case is deemed IDT and ITVA BSC will complete any necessary account adjustments. If the determination is not IDT, ITVA will respond to the taxpayer regarding the IDT issue. Exam will continue with the audit as appropriate.
IDT allegations and claims will continue to be referred from TAS when they meet TAS criteria 1-4. TAS also has the discretion to assign and refer any criteria 5-7 cases.
IDT OARs will be routed through the TEFRA TAS liaison and follow normal TAS procedures per IRM 126.96.36.199, Taxpayer Advocate Service (TAS) Procedures. IDT OARs will be worked in the Specialized Teams.
The TAS liaison will work with the IDT liaison to insure both TAS and IDT procedures are followed and dual controls maintained on the accounts.
The Accounts Management (AM) Identity Protection Specialized Unit (IPSU) was established to be the initial contact to assist taxpayers who are victims of IDT. IRM 25.23.3, IMF Toll-Free and Identity Protection Specialized Unit- (IPSU) Paper, and IRM 25.23, Identity Protection and Victim Assistance, provide guidance on the actions completed by IPSU.
When IPSU determines the IDT claim or allegation is a tax-related incident, a referral is prepared and issued to the controlling function. There are two referral types prepared by AM that are routed to TEFRA to the IDT or Identity Theft Assistance Request (ITAR) Liaison, as applicable:
Form 14027-B, Identity Theft Case Referral, for pending claims or IDT claims received in AM with TEFRA controls.
Form 14103, Identity Theft Assistance Request (ITAR), IDT cases that meet TAS criteria 5-7. See IRM 188.8.131.52, TAS Case Criteria.
Each function has an ITAR Liaison who is responsible for coordinating ITAR referrals to and from IPSU. A list of Functional ITAR Liaisons is located on the SERP Who/Where tab.
The TEFRA ITAR Liaison will:
Screen all incoming and outgoing Form 14103, Identity Theft Assistance Request (ITAR), to verify they meet TAS criteria 5-7 per IRM 184.108.40.206, Identity Theft Assistance Request (ITAR) – General Information. Reject all ITAR referrals not meeting the criteria, i.e., no IDT verification documents or has an open TAS control on Master File.
Acknowledge receipt of ITAR cases referred within five business days via secured E-mail or fax number provided by the IPSU employee on the Form 14103, Section II, Box 3.
Review Form 14103 and determine whether the recommended action is appropriate and the requested completion date is reasonable.
Contact the IPSU employee shown in Section II if there are questions regarding the recommended action or if additional time is required. The TEFRA ITAR Liaison and IPSU employee must reach an agreement on the substantive case issues, recommended actions and follow-up and completion dates.
Maintain a log of all ITAR referrals.
Establish IDRS Master File controls and assign accounts.
Monitor all open ITARs and address potential or aged completion dates.
When the case is completed, timely fax or E-mail Form 14103 to IPSU with all required fields completed and copies of all letters and forms. The fax number is shown on Form 14103 in Section II, Box 3.
For TEFRA identified ITAR cases, review Form 4442 prepared by the examiner and send via secure E-mail or by fax to the IDT fax line (by close of business (COB) the day the criteria was identified. The referral must contain all taxpayer’s correspondence with any attachments/documentation received with the case. See IRM 220.127.116.11.5, Identity Theft Assistance Request (ITAR) – General Information.
ITARs follow the same requirements as OAR's. Examiners have the following responsibilities:
Contact the IPSU employee shown in Section II if there are questions regarding the recommended action or if additional time is required. The examiner and IPSU employee must reach an agreement on the substantive case issues, recommended actions and follow-up and completion dates. If the completion date is re-negotiated by the examiner, notify the ITAR Liaison of the new completion date.
Correspond directly with the taxpayer. Keep copies of all letters and forms sent to and received from the taxpayer.
In addition to documenting CEAS workpapers, document all actions in AMS.
When the ITAR case is completed, return the completed Form 14103 with copies of all letters and forms to the TEFRA ITAR Liaison to review and fax to IPSU.
If the examiner determines an IDT case meets ITAR criteria 5-7 during the review of correspondence or on a call with a taxpayer the examiner must alert their Lead or manager to initiate resolution of the IDT claim.
If the action cannot be completed or initiated within 24 hours, prepare Form 4442, Inquiry Referral, and forward to the TEFRA ITAR Liaison according to IRM 18.104.22.168.5, Identity Theft Assistance Request (ITAR) – General Information.
The Liaison will review for accuracy and
fax to IPSU
The examiner will input a CEAS Action note according to IRM 22.214.171.124.3, CEAS Notes, to alert the assigned campus of the pending ITAR.
When IPSU receives allegations of IDT or IDT claims and determines another function has open controls on the case or if the taxpayer is responding to a function’s notice, they will prepare Form 14027-B, Identity Theft Case Referral, and route it the functional Identity Theft Liaison (ITL).
The TEFRA ITL will coordinate and monitor all IDT actions for their designated campus Field Support operation. This includes all referrals to and from the operation that do not meet ITAR criteria.
When Form 14027-B, Identity Theft Case Referral, is received from IPSU, the TEFRA ITL will:
Acknowledge receipt of the form by filling out Section V on page 2 and fax back to IPSU or reject Form 14027-B within 5 days.
Establish IDRS Master File controls with the appropriate Activity Codes provided in the Exam IDT Control Base Input tool.
Monitor all open Form 14027-B and address potential or aged completion dates.
Assign the case to an examiner within two business days.
Review completed cases and return Form 14027-B to IPSU.
The examiner assigned to the Form 14027-B account is responsible for meeting or negotiating new completion dates and keeping the AM caseworker apprised of the status of the TEFRA actions. Notify the TEFRA ITL of any updates to the completion date.
Case action will be based upon:
If Then Taxpayer did not provide documentation within 45 days of being provided information on filing an IDT claim by AM or TEFRA
• Complete Form 14027-B, Section VIII, 4. Comments: No Reply from TP,
• Update IDRS control base; NOREPLY
• Input TC 971 AC 522 “NOREPLY”, and
• Continue normal case processing
Taxpayer submitted documentation unrelated to the IDT issue or did not substantiate the IDT claim
• Complete Form 14027-B, Section VIII, 4. Comments: No IDT substantiation from TP,
• Update IDRS control base: NOIDTSUBST,
• Input TC 971 AC 522 “NOIDT”, and
• Continue normal case processing
Taxpayer submitted documentation that supported the IDT claim
• Complete Form 14027-B, Section VIII, 4. Comments IDT substantiation received and determined valid IDT claim; check “Yes” in box 3,
• Update IDRS control base: IDTSUBST
• Input TC 971 AC 522 according to procedures in Exam TC 971/972 AC 522 Input Fields tool,
• Conduct complete case analysis and prepare the referral per instruction in IRM 126.96.36.199.11 Referrals to IDTVA-C
Route completed Form 14027-B to the TEFRA ITL for review and return to the AM IPSU caseworker.
A copy of the Form 14027-B must be kept with the TEFRA audit package.
Dependents may file as victims of IDT. If the SSN was used to file a return, follow IDT procedures outlined in this IRM to resolve the account. If the SSN was used as a dependent on another return generally duplicate TIN program filtering is applied. Additional information on dependents as victims of IDT is available in IRM 25.23.2, Identity Protection and Victim Assistance.
Non-Filer IDT cases will be worked according to IRM 4.19.17, Non-Filer Program.
Refer to IRM 188.8.131.52, Return Preparer Scheme Identification, for procedures for preparer and ITIN preparer schemes.
Referrals from Automated Collection Systems Support (ACSS) or Collection (CSCO) operations will be screened and reviewed following TEFRA IDT procedures. ACSS or CSCO will forward IDT claims if there are current or prior TEFRA controls on the impacted account.
Misrouted referrals and referrals to other functions: Service wide procedures are being developed for IDT referrals between functions. When sending a referral to another function other than IDTVA-C, complete Form 4442 and forward to the Identity Theft Liaison. See IRM 184.108.40.206, Function Responsibility for Identity Theft Assistance Request (ITAR) Referrals to IPSU.
When schemed are identified within the IDT inventories and the perpetrator is known, referrals should be made to the Campus Fraud Coordinator for potential civil actions.
When schemes are identified while working the IDT inventories and the perpetrator is not known, referrals can be made to Criminal Investigation (CI). A scheme is define as two or more returns with the same pattern. See IRM 220.127.116.11.3, Referrals to Criminal Investigation (CI). Sufficient information must be provided that outline the scheme. Managerial approval is required prior to referring any scheme to CI.
Do not forward statute year referrals to IDTVA-C without completing the screening procedures outlined in this section.
IRM 25.6, Statute of Limitations, provides the service-wide procedures for identifying and processing statute returns. TEFRA will follow the guidelines set forth in IRM 25.6, Statute of Limitations, with the noted exceptions provided in this section.
Statute procedures apply to IDT referrals if the Assessment Statute Expiration Date (ASED) is within 180 days of expiring.
Verify the TC 150 statute date; determine the number of days remaining on the TC 150 statute.
If a return was filed by the legitimate taxpayer, SSN owner, verify the received date and determine the number of days remaining on the statute. The return may be a TC 976 document or an original unprocessed signed return submitted with correspondence.
Use the earliest of the statute dates.
Generally, Form 872 will not be solicited from the legitimate taxpayer or the perpetrator on IDT cases.
Do not reverse or make any adjustments to the accounts. Credit transfers to excess funds can be completed after the ASED.
IDT referrals fall into 3 general categories:
Multiple Return, Legitimate Taxpayer Return not posted to the account
Multiple Return, Legitimate Taxpayer Return assessment/adjustment posted to the account (TC 29X)
Review IDRS to verify no TC 976 or 977 transactions are on the account and review the case documents to verify no unnumbered unprocessed returns were received from the taxpayer.
If there is no TC 976/977 or unprocessed return, no action for statute protection.
If there is a TC 976/977 or unprocessed return, follow Multiple Return procedures.
For accounts with the legitimate taxpayer return not posted to the account or requiring additional assessments a protective assessment will be required.
If the legitimate taxpayer return is posted to the account, compare the account adjustments to determine if all assessments match the legitimate return figures or if additional assessments are required.
To request a protective assessment, prepare Form 2859, Request for Quick or Prompt Assessment, annotate at the top of the form “ID Theft Statute Year”.
The Form 2859 will be prepared for an appropriate amount to protect a tax increases, credit decreases, and applicable penalties to the account based on the legitimate taxpayer return.
Input the assessment amount as a TC 290 on Form 2859.
Input the following in the Remarks section: “Agreed Assessment. Do not send any bills or notices to the taxpayer.” Also include whichever statement is applicable, “The TC 150 will be moved to an Internal Revenue Service Number (IRSN) with Form 12810 when the account is worked” or “The TC 150 will be reversed following nullity and Account 1545 procedures.” Do not include any tax decrease or credit increase adjustments to the account.
In Part B, Requestor Information, input the name and campus preparing the document and input the DITA site contact information. The IDTVA-C liaison will be the contact for Accounting to determine the final posting information.
Prepare Form 3210 and fax or hand walk the Form 2859 and statute return to the applicable Accounting Operation.
Input a control base assigned to the employee requesting the prompt assessment with Activity Code “QUIK ASSMT”. IDTVA-C will reassign the control base when the statute referral is received.
Keep a copy of the legitimate taxpayer’s return and Form 2859 with documentation for monitoring.
Prepare the referral to IDTVA-C and annotate at the top of the referral form “ID Theft Statute Year”. If the taxpayer is due a refund, include a note to issue a manual refund.