4.36.3 Examination Team Responsibilities 4.36.3.1 Program Scope and Objectives 4.36.3.1.1 Background 4.36.3.1.2 Authority 4.36.3.1.3 Responsibilities 4.36.3.1.4 Terms/Definitions/Acronyms 4.36.3.1.5 Related Resources 4.36.3.2 Examination Procedures 4.36.3.2.1 Case Identification 4.36.3.2.2 Claim Filed During Examination 4.36.3.2.3 Discovery that Report Was Not Prepared 4.36.3.2.4 Claim Filed for Previously Examined Year 4.36.3.2.5 Information Given to Taxpayer 4.36.3.2.6 Form 870 4.36.3.2.6.1 Assessment Prior to Review 4.36.3.2.7 Refund Prior to Review 4.36.3.2.8 Restricted Interest 4.36.3.2.9 Claim Disallowance in Agreed Cases 4.36.3.3 Types of Joint Committee Reviews 4.36.3.3.1 JC Electronic Case Reviews (LB&I except for IIC) 4.36.3.3.2 JC Closed Case Reviews (SB/SE, TE/GE, and LB&I’s IIC) 4.36.3.3.3 Case Processing After JCT Clearance - JC Electronic Case Review 4.36.3.4 Survey After Assignment Criteria 4.36.3.4.1 Survey Documentation 4.36.3.4.2 Survey Forms 4.36.3.4.3 Procedural Requirements – Survey Cases 4.36.3.4.4 Refund Counsel Inquiries on Survey Cases 4.36.3.5 Statute of Limitations 4.36.3.5.1 Restricted Consents 4.36.3.5.2 Alpha Statutes 4.36.3.5.3 Examination Action on Short Statutes 4.36.3.5.4 Statute Control During Review and JC Report Process 4.36.3.6 Documentation Requirements 4.36.3.6.1 Revenue Agent's Report (RAR) Requirements 4.36.3.6.2 Closing Agreements 4.36.3.6.2.1 Competent Authority 4.36.3.6.2.2 Advance Pricing Agreements (APAs) 4.36.3.6.3 Compliance Assurance Process (CAP) 4.36.3.6.4 Taxpayer Information - Form 4665 Report Transmittal Requirements 4.36.3.6.4.1 Contact Information - Examination Team 4.36.3.6.4.2 Short Taxable Periods 4.36.3.6.4.3 Large, Unusual or Questionable Items 4.36.3.6.5 Joint Committee Spreadsheets 4.36.3.6.6 Transcripts of Accounts 4.36.3.6.7 Change of Accounting 4.36.3.7 Reporting Prior to Resolution Of All Issues 4.36.3.7.1 Cases with Unagreed Issues - Minimum Refund 4.36.3.7.1.1 Documentation Requirements on Minimum Refund Cases 4.36.3.7.2 Tentative Allowances from Unexamined Source Years-Report Required 4.36.3.7.3 Request for Refund – Claims from Unexamined Source or Refund Years – Modified Expedite Refund Report 4.36.3.7.4 Posting of Security Modified Expedite Refund Report 4.36.3.8 Submission of Case to Joint Committee Review 4.36.3.8.1 Electronic Referral Case Review (LB&I Cases, Except LB&I IIC) 4.36.3.8.2 Closed Case Review/Electronic Referral Case Review (LB&I IIC, SB/SE and TE/GE Cases) 4.36.3.8.3 Joint Committee Review Contact Information 4.36.3.9 Inquiries from Joint Committee Review 4.36.3.9.1 Types of Inquiries 4.36.3.9.2 Proposed Changes to the RAR 4.36.3.10 Disclosure of Correspondence with Joint Committee on Taxation 4.36.3.11 Referral to Taxpayer Advocate Service by the Examination Team 4.36.3.12 Examination/Appeals Case Coordination Exhibit 4.36.3-1 Sample Security Agreement Exhibit 4.36.3-2 Procedures for Cases Involving Claims From Unexamined Source or Refund Years - Modified Expedite Refund Exhibit 4.36.3-3 Sample Request For Advanced Review of Closing Agreement Exhibit 4.36.3-4 CCP Instructions for Examination Team (Only LB&I Examination Teams Except for IIC) Part 4. Examining Process Chapter 36. Joint Committee Procedures Section 3. Examination Team Responsibilities 4.36.3 Examination Team Responsibilities Manual Transmittal June 21, 2021 Purpose (1) This transmits revised IRM 4.36.3, Joint Committee Procedures, Examination Team Responsibilities. Material Changes (1) Content in this section was rearranged to conform to the internal control format mandated Servicewide by IRM 1.11.2.2.5, Address Management and Internal Controls. IRM 4.36.3.1, Program Scope and Objectives, contains internal control information. (2) Corrected publication date on subsections changed in last revision to 9-23-2015. (Date was listed as 9-22-2015.) (3) Changes were made to the following subsections: IRM Subsection Title Description of Change 4.36.3.2.1 Case Identification Added clarification regarding project code 0077. 4.36.3.2.3 Discovery That Report Was Not Prepared Added instructions for Chief Counsel coordination 4.36.3.2.8 Restricted Interest Clarified who is responsible for preparation of Form 2285 4.36.3.3.1 JC Electronic Case Reviews (LB&I except for IIC) Updated website to Virtual Library 4.36.3.3.3 Case Processing After JCT Clearance - JC Electronic Case Review Renumbered and clarification added 4.36.3.4 Survey After Assignment Criteria Added clarification about surveys before assignment 4.36.3.4.1 Survey Documentation Updated website to Virtual Library 4.36.3.6.5 Joint Committee Spreadsheets Updated website to Virtual Library 4.36.3.7 Reporting Prior to Resolution of All Issues Added reference to Large Corporate Compliance (LCC) cases 4.36.3.7.1 Cases with Unagreed Issues - Minimum Refund Clarified instructions and added reference to LCC cases 4.36.3.7.2 Tentative Allowances from Unexamined Source Years-Report Required Added reference to LCC cases 4.36.3.8 Submission of Case to Joint Committee Review New title and updated website to Virtual Library 4.36.3.8.1 Electronic Referral Case Review (LB&I Cases, Except LB&I IIC) New subsection 4.36.3.8.2 Closed Case Review/Electronic Referral Case Review (LB&I IIC, SB/SE and TE/GE Cases New subsection 4.36.3.8.3 Joint Committee Review Contact Information Updated contact information 4.36.3.9.1 Types of Inquiries Removed reference to IRM Exhibit 4.36.4-3 4.36.3.9.2 Proposed Changes to the RAR Removed reference to IRM Exhibit 4.36.4-3. 4.36.3.10 Disclosure of Correspondence with Joint Committee on Taxation Added clarification Exhibit 4.36.3-2 Procedures for Cases Involving Claims From Unexamined Source or Refund Years - Modified Expedite Refund Added reference to Large Corporate Compliance cases (4) Various editorial changes and corrections have been made throughout this IRM. Effect on Other Documents This section supersedes IRM 4.36.3, Examiner's Responsibilities, dated September 23, 2015. Audience LB&I, SB/SE, TE/GE Effective Date (06-21-2021) Theodore D. Setzer Acting Assistant Deputy Commissioner Compliance Integration Large Business and International Division 4.36.3.1 (06-21-2021) Program Scope and Objectives Purpose: This IRM section sets forth examination team responsibilities and procedures relative to Joint Committee cases. It covers the following areas: Examination procedures (IRM 4.36.3.2) Types of Joint Committee reviews (IRM 4.36.3.3) Survey after assignment criteria (IRM 4.36.3.4) Statute of limitations (IRM 4.36.3.5) Documentation requirements (IRM 4.36.3.6) Reporting prior to resolution of all issues (IRM 4.36.3.7) Submission of case to Joint Committee Review (IRM 4.36.3.8) Inquiries from Joint Committee Review (IRM 4.36.3.9) Disclosure of correspondence with Joint Committee on Taxation (JCT) (IRM 4.36.3.10) Referral to Taxpayer Advocate Service by the examination team (IRM 4.36.3.11) Examination/Appeals case coordination (IRM 4.36.3.12) Audience: Examination personnel in LB&I, SB/SE and TE/GE business operating divisions who work on Joint Committee cases. Policy Owner: LB&I Policy under the Strategy, Policy and Governance office in the Assistant Deputy Commissioner Compliance Integration organization. Program Owner: Joint Committee Review within the Northeastern Compliance Practice Area. Primary Stakeholders: Stakeholders include examiners, taxpayers and the Joint Committee on Taxation. 4.36.3.1.1 (06-21-2021) Background See IRM 4.36.1.1.1, Background. 4.36.3.1.2 (06-21-2021) Authority IRC 6405 requires review of certain cases by the Joint Committee on Taxation. 4.36.3.1.3 (06-21-2021) Responsibilities See IRM 4.36.1.1.3, Roles and Responsibilities. 4.36.3.1.4 (06-21-2021) Terms/Definitions/Acronyms See IRM Exhibit 4.36.1-1, Acronyms Used Throughout 4.36, for a list of commonly used acronyms. 4.36.3.1.5 (06-21-2021) Related Resources Joint Committee topics may be found on the IRS Knowledge Management website at: Joint Committee Virtual Library. This site contains a wealth of information about all the various aspects of a Joint Committee case, including frequently asked questions, job aids, contact information, and JC forms. It is a place to visit for valuable tools and resources. 4.36.3.2 (09-23-2015) Examination Procedures Joint Committee cases are to be given the same thorough examination as other cases of a similar size and difficulty. It is the examination team’s responsibility to determine the scope and depth of the examination. The JCT will generally accept business decisions that are made in examinations, but those decisions must be properly supported and documented. In addition, other management initiatives, such as Fast Track Settlement and Accelerated Issue Resolution, may also be used in resolving issues in Joint Committee cases. However, see IRM 4.36.4.7 for applicable closing agreement procedures. When a loss is attributable to a flow-thru entity, the examiner should, at a minimum, inspect the return and determine whether an examination is warranted. A copy of the flow-thru return, whether examined or not, should be included in the case file for informational purposes. When Competent Authority is involved in a Joint Committee case, keep in mind that closing agreements (if prepared) must be reviewed by the JCT before being signed by the Service. Fully agreed cases are reported to the JCT. For unagreed cases, no report is required at the time the case is closed to the Office of Appeals. However, once an agreement has been reached and the case still meets JCT criteria, Appeals will be responsible for preparing and submitting a report to the JCT. Partially agreed cases will require reporting to the JCT if the taxpayer is entitled to a refund over $2 million ($5 million for C corporations) regardless of the resolution of the unagreed issues. This situation is known as a minimum refund. If the taxpayer signs Form 870 requesting the refund, the examiner will follow the Joint Committee procedures, and Joint Committee Review will prepare and submit a report to the JCT on the minimum refund. The Appeals Officer will submit a supplemental report to the JCT when the unagreed issues are finally resolved even if the resolution of such issues does not cause an additional refund or credit. See IRM 4.36.3.7.1 for detailed information and procedures on minimum refunds. 4.36.3.2.1 (06-21-2021) Case Identification The examination group is responsible for identifying all Joint Committee cases in their inventory, based on either the return information submitted by the taxpayer or when the case qualifies for JCT review as the result of an examination. The examination group must ensure that all returns (both source and carryback years) in the case file have project code 0077 on ERCS/AIMS to indicate that the case is subject to JCT review. Joint Committee cases with project code 0077 may only be surveyed after assignment or examined; these cases are not allowed to be surveyed before assignment. All surveyed after assignment and examined cases must be reviewed by the JCT. If during an examination an examiner determines a case no longer meets the JC refund thresholds, the examiner is to submit a request to the manager to remove project code. Project code 0077 takes precedence over all other project codes that may be applicable to the case. See IRM 4.36.2.4 for guidance in determining the jurisdictional amount. 4.36.3.2.2 (05-04-2010) Claim Filed During Examination Where a case is under examination or has been examined but not closed by the examination team and the taxpayer files a claim for refund or application for tentative allowance sufficient to bring the case within the jurisdiction of the JCT, the examination will be extended to include such source year. Certain cases can be closed and reported to the JCT prior to the resolution of all issues. See IRM 4.36.3.7.2 for the procedures and criteria for tentative allowances from unexamined source years and IRM 4.36.3.7.3 for the procedures and criteria for claims from unexamined source or refund years. Example 1: Facts: Examination resulted in an overassessment of $1,600,000 for 2013. During the examination a claim (Form 1040X, Amended U.S. Individual Income Tax Return) is filed for 2013 for $410,000 based on a 2015 NOL. Conclusion: The examination should be extended to include 2015, since the aggregate amount of the refunds or credits under IRC 6405(a) exceeds $2 million. Example 2: Facts: Examination resulted in an overassessment of $1,600,000 for 2013. During the examination a claim (Form 1120X, Amended U.S. Corporation Income Tax Return) is filed for 2013 for $410,000 based on a 2015 NOL. Conclusion: The examination should not be extended to include 2015, since the aggregate amount of the refunds or credits under IRM 6405(a) is not in excess of $5 million (threshold for C corporations effective 12/19/2014). Example 3: Facts: Examination resulted in an over-assessment of $900,000 for 2013. During the examination an application for tentative allowance (Form 1139, Corporation Application for Tentative Refund) is filed for 2013 for $4,200,000 based on a 2015 NOL. Conclusion: The examination will not be extended for purposes of JCT consideration since separate computations of jurisdictional limits under either IRC 6405(a) or IRC 6405(b) do not exceed $5 million (threshold for C corporations effective 12/19/2014). 4.36.3.2.3 (06-21-2021) Discovery that Report Was Not Prepared Upon discovery that an overpayment in excess of $2 million ($5 million for C corporations) has been refunded without a report to the JCT, the examiner will notify the manager and the JCR team. The JCR team will coordinate with the Office of Chief Counsel, Procedure and Administration, Branch 3 or 4 on the appropriate steps to take on a case-by-case basis. When a case that requires reporting to the JCT was inadvertently not reported, the examination team that concluded the examination of the case will be responsible for securing the files and preparing the case for Joint Committee review. The normal guidelines will be followed, even though the examination has been completed and closed. 4.36.3.2.4 (09-23-2015) Claim Filed for Previously Examined Year All pertinent years (both refund and source years) must be covered in a current examination or survey after assignment action, even if one or more of the refund years has been previously surveyed or examined. All prior audit or survey reports pertaining to such years must be included in the case file. If the refund or credit is for a year that was previously examined, that year should not be reexamined unless such action is necessary under reopening criteria, also known as case return criteria. 4.36.3.2.5 (06-21-2021) Information Given to Taxpayer Upon completion of the examination, the examination team will solicit an agreement to the findings and inform the taxpayer that a report to the JCT is necessary and additional processing time will be required. The examination team should also advise the taxpayer to expect written notification when the report has been forwarded to the JCT. The examination team should answer any taxpayer questions about Joint Committee procedures. Letter 1573 (P) is a letter Joint Committee Review prepares to be sent to the taxpayer when the JC Report is sent to the JCT. 4.36.3.2.6 (09-23-2015) Form 870 Joint Committee cases are considered "Excepted Agreed Cases" and as such the reopening procedures do not apply. IRM 4.10.8.4 states that Form 870, Waiver of Restriction on Assessment and Collection of Deficiency in Tax and Acceptance of Overassessment, will be used along with Form 4549-A in all Joint Committee cases. Form 870 must not contain any restricted language. A qualified Form 870 will not be accepted for Joint Committee cases. 4.36.3.2.6.1 (09-23-2015) Assessment Prior to Review If six (6) months or less remain on statute of limitations, and the taxpayer will not extend the statute, the deficiency must be assessed prior to forwarding the case to Joint Committee Review. 4.36.3.2.7 (09-23-2015) Refund Prior to Review If the taxpayer signs an unqualified Form 870 and the net overassessment is less than $2 million ($5 million for C corporations), the overassessment (and deficiency, if any) may be processed prior to reporting the IRC 6405(b) refund (tentative allowance) to the JCT. This only applies if there is sufficient time open on the statute of limitations to follow deficiency procedures. 4.36.3.2.8 (06-21-2021) Restricted Interest Adjustments due to carrybacks will result in restricted interest. Even if there is no tax change to a carryback year, there may be a net interest assessment or abatement. The restricted interest provisions should be explained to the taxpayer. The tax computation specialist (TCS) is responsible for the preparation of Part I of Form 2285, Concurrent Determinations of Deficiencies and Overassessments in Cases Involving Restricted Interest Provisions of the Internal Revenue Code. For estate tax, use Form 1366, Tax Analysis Worksheet of Overassessment of Estate Tax Involving Restricted Interest. Form 2285 is required if there are tax changes from current year adjustments and at least one carryback year, or changes from two or more carryback years without any current year adjustments. The examination team should review the computations with the TCS. If all of the tax adjustments to a year are due to an increase or decrease of just one carryback year, the Form 3198, Special Handling Notice for Examination Case Processing, needs to have this information. Form 2285 will not be required for this year. 4.36.3.2.9 (09-23-2015) Claim Disallowance in Agreed Cases Due to the time required to process a Joint Committee case, the examiner will not solicit Form 2297, Waiver of Statutory Notification of Claim Disallowance, in an agreed claim case involving the disallowance in full or in part of a claim for refund or credit. Such action disadvantages the taxpayer by prematurely starting the running of the two-year period for filing suit. On Joint Committee cases, Form 3363, Acceptance of Proposed Disallowance of Claim for Refund or Credit, should be secured in addition to Form 870, if there are no adjustments other than the claim. The examiner should indicate on Form 3198 (or other special handling form) that a statutory notice of claim disallowance should be issued after release from the JCT. 4.36.3.3 (09-23-2015) Types of Joint Committee Reviews Joint Committee Review is responsible for the preparation of the report that is furnished to the JCT. These reviews are either conducted as Joint Committee electronic case reviews or as physical case reviews. 4.36.3.3.1 (06-21-2021) JC Electronic Case Reviews (LB&I except for IIC) The Joint Committee electronic case reviews are conducted remotely by Joint Committee Review with the examination team’s participation, as needed, for all of LB&I’s Joint Committee cases except for the International Individual Compliance (IIC) organization. The instructions to request the mandatory Joint Committee review are at: JC Electronic Referral Reviews. To initiate a Joint Committee review, the Joint Committee Electronic Referral form is required to be prepared and submitted by the examination team. The form can be accessed electronically on the IRS Knowledge Management website at: JC Electronic Referral Form . 4.36.3.3.2 (09-23-2015) JC Closed Case Reviews (SB/SE, TE/GE, and LB&I’s IIC) A physical case review is conducted after the JC case has been forwarded from the examination team to Joint Committee Review. Joint Committee Review is responsible for statute controls, controlling the case on ERCS, and closing the case to Centralized Case Processing (CCP) upon clearance of the JC case from the JCT. See IRM 4.36.3.8 for submission procedures. Joint Committee Review conducts a focused review of the case which includes the RAR, JC spreadsheet, and other supporting documentation. This JC review and the preparation of the report to JCT take place at the JC Specialist’s post-of-duty. 4.36.3.3.3 (06-21-2021) Case Processing After JCT Clearance - JC Electronic Case Review When the clearance letter or staff review memorandum is received from the JCT, Joint Committee Review will prepare and mail Letter 1574(P) indicating JCT clearance to inform the taxpayer and authorized representative, if applicable. See Exhibit 4.36.3-4 for case closing instructions to LB&I examination teams. 4.36.3.4 (06-21-2021) Survey After Assignment Criteria Returns in Joint Committee cases may be surveyed after assignment if the returns would normally have been surveyed before or after assignment during a regular examination except for the fact that the returns require Joint Committee review. The examination team can survey some or all of the returns. Survey before assignment procedures may not be used for Joint Committee cases. 4.36.3.4.1 (06-21-2021) Survey Documentation There must be sufficient documentation in the examiner’s case file to justify that an examination is not warranted. If the reason, economic or otherwise, for the overassessment is not readily available from the return or file, attempts should be made to obtain the necessary information from public sources (e.g., annual report, Security Exchange Commission’s filings, Moody’s, Standard and Poor’s, etc.) or directly from the taxpayer. Examination’s request for retained copies of the taxpayer's tax returns, prior RARs, or information otherwise available from public sources is within the confines of a survey action. If the taxpayer is contacted, the examination team should point out that the Service proposes to accept the return as filed; that such action is subject to review by the JCT; and that certain additional information is needed to properly prepare the report. See the IRS Knowledge Management website at: Joint Committee Forms for an example of a pro-forma survey contact letter and information document request for survey cases. However, if examination makes an inspection of any portion of the taxpayer's books and records (except as provided in this section) or discusses any potential issues with the taxpayer, the return may not be surveyed under this procedure. 4.36.3.4.2 (09-23-2015) Survey Forms All returns will be surveyed using Form 1900, Income Tax Survey After Assignment. The survey form will fully explain the reasons for the survey and include references to pertinent portions of the examiner's case file. Each year must be shown separately on the survey form. Entries for the tentative allowance column are from Form 1139 or Form 1045. Entries for the claim amount column are from Form 1120X or Form 1040X. The form requires both the examiner's and team manager's signature. 4.36.3.4.3 (09-23-2015) Procedural Requirements – Survey Cases All pertinent years (the refund years and the source years i.e., NOL, credit, etc.) not currently being examined must be covered in the survey action, even though one or more of the refund years may have been previously closed either by survey or examination. Also, all prior examination reports pertaining to such years must be included in the case file. Surveys of tax returns may be made on the basis of the taxpayer's retained copies. However, care must be taken to ensure that the tax shown on the copies agrees with current transcripts (no more than 30 days old at time of submission). The documentation requirements of IRM 4.36.3.6 are applicable. Form 3198 or other special handling form will be completed and marked "Mandatory Review" and "Joint Committee Case" . Form 5351, Examination /Non-Examined Closings, will be signed by the manager and included in the case file. Form 5344, Examination Closing Record, is required where there are unpaid survey claims (Form 1120X or 1040X). The case file should contain a detailed explanation justifying the survey action. An explanation of the reason for the overassessment and prior audit history should also be included. Form 5231, Joint Committee Case Check List, must be prepared. 4.36.3.4.4 (09-23-2015) Refund Counsel Inquiries on Survey Cases If an inquiry from the JCT cannot be resolved without taxpayer contact, Joint Committee Review should contact the JCT Refund Counsel to discuss any problems that exist. All inquiries from JCT are Congressional Inquiries subject to disclosure rules. If the Refund Counsel and the Service believe the requested information is critical, the taxpayer's returns will be examined only to the extent necessary to respond to the inquiry. The examination may take the form of a telephone call to the taxpayer, perhaps coupled with a letter of explanation to the taxpayer or representative, or limited in scope to an in-process examination of specific portions of the taxpayer's books and records that are relevant to respond to the inquiry. Therefore, survey procedures are no longer applicable and a RAR is required. Absent formal instructions to the contrary, requests by the JCT for additional documentation in specific cases will not be considered precedents for similar documentation in other cases involving the same issue. 4.36.3.5 (09-23-2015) Statute of Limitations Every effort will be made to obtain consents to extend the statute of limitations so that at least 12 months remain on the statute for both source and carryback years. If the taxpayer will not extend the statute and there are less than 12 months remaining on the statute, the examination team should contact Joint Committee Review. Refer to IRM 25.6.23 for statute control procedures. 4.36.3.5.1 (05-04-2010) Restricted Consents Restricted consents will not be used in Joint Committee cases since it would restrict the rights of the JCT to perform their oversight function. 4.36.3.5.2 (09-23-2015) Alpha Statutes The statute date of the carryback years should be updated on AIMS and ERCS with the correct alpha code when the regular statute has expired or is about to expire. See IRM Exhibit 25.6.23-3 for instructions on updating the statute. For unpaid claims, replace the day field with AA. The month and year do not change. When the claim or tentative allowance has already been paid, BB (NOL) and DD (credits) replace the day. The month and year will be changed to those of the earliest source year return. 4.36.3.5.3 (09-23-2015) Examination Action on Short Statutes The examination team is required to comply with IRM 25.6, Statute of Limitations. Form 895, Notice of Statute Expiration, must be placed on the outside of the case folder on top of all other documents, whenever a statute will expire within 180 days. 4.36.3.5.4 (09-23-2015) Statute Control During Review and JC Report Process For a Joint Committee electronic case review, the examination team retains the case files and closes the case to CCP. The examination team is responsible for maintaining the required statute controls. For a Joint Committee physical case review, Joint Committee Review retains the case files and closes the case to CCP. Joint Committee Review will maintain statute controls under existing procedures throughout the review and reporting process. Occasionally, a case may need to be sent back to the examination group to close out to CCP. 4.36.3.6 (05-04-2010) Documentation Requirements IRC 6405 requires a report to be submitted to the JCT. These reports are the principal source of information for the JCT. The examiner is expected to adequately explain and to furnish necessary supporting information for the issues reflected in the RAR. Therefore, care must be taken to ensure that the case files contain sufficient information for the preparation of the report. 4.36.3.6.1 (09-23-2015) Revenue Agent's Report (RAR) Requirements A Form 5231, Joint Committee Case Checklist, must be completed by the examination team for each case. An RAR will be prepared for all examined cases, and will include all of the following: Form 4665, Report Transmittal Form 870, Waiver of Restriction on Assessment and Collection of Deficiency in Tax and Acceptance of Overassessment, signed by the taxpayer, corporate officer or Power of Attorney. Form 4549-A, Income Tax Examination Changes Note: Tentative refunds should be shown separately on Line 13(a). Computation schedules for other taxes and credits Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT) schedules, even if there is no AMT liability Written explanation of adjustments on Forms 886-A or 5701 must be attached to the Form 4549-A All electronic data files used to generate the RAR must be included. Per IRM 4.10.8.14.3.3, Reports After a Tentative Refund or Credit, when there are tentative NOL carrybacks, the RAR should show the correct net operating loss deduction (NOLD) amount. If the NOLD is allowed in full, the entire NOLD would be shown as an adjustment. If the NOLD is not allowed, the adjustment would be zero. The taxable income should be before the NOL carryback. The total corrected tax liability should be shown as follows: Line 12 - Tax Per Return or as Previously Adjusted XXXXXXXX Line 13(a)-(d) Tentative Allowances XXXXXXXX Line 14 - Deficiency or Overassessment XXXXXXXX 4.36.3.6.2 (09-23-2015) Closing Agreements Closing agreements must not be executed on behalf of the Government until reviewed by the JCT. See IRM 4.36.4.7. Except as explained below, if a case requires the execution of a closing agreement and must be reported to the JCT, the case files should be provided to Joint Committee Review with the closing agreement not executed on behalf of the IRS. Upon receipt of the clearance letter, the examination team will be responsible for execution of the closing agreement. The examination team will close the case to CCP after the closing agreement has been signed by the appropriate official. In those situations where an issue is resolved early in the examination, such as Fast Track Settlement or Early Referral to Appeals, and it is known or likely that the case will require a report to the JCT, the examination team may request an advanced review of the closing agreement by the JCT prior to the case closing. If the examination team wishes to pursue this option, the examination team will prepare a cover memo and forward a copy of the closing agreement and any relevant supporting documents to Joint Committee Review (JCR). JCR will forward the documents to the JCT. After review by JCT, the agreement can be signed by the appropriate Service official. (See Exhibit 4.36.3-3.) When the examination is still in process, there is a disclosure issue in sending a closing agreement to the JCT. The examination team will solicit written authorization from the taxpayer to provide the closing agreement to the JCT. If the taxpayer refuses, a redacted copy will be sent. 4.36.3.6.2.1 (09-23-2015) Competent Authority Competent Authority determinations can be executed by the Service prior to review by Joint Committee. However, these agreements must be included in the Service’s report to JCT. Under certain circumstances, a Minimum Refund Report can be submitted to the JCT. Under the Minimum Refund procedure, all issues relating to an ongoing Competent Authority determination will be considered as unagreed issues in determining whether the Minimum Refund procedures apply. If a Minimum Refund report is submitted, a supplemental report to the JCT will be required upon completion of the Competent Authority determination provided that any resulting additional refund meets the applicable jurisdictional threshold. See IRM 4.36.3.7.1. 4.36.3.6.2.2 (09-23-2015) Advance Pricing Agreements (APAs) Advance Pricing Agreements must be finalized before a report can be submitted to the JCT. A copy of the APA should be provided to Joint Committee Review for inclusion in the report to the JCT. 4.36.3.6.3 (09-23-2015) Compliance Assurance Process (CAP) At the conclusion of a Compliance Assurance Process review, if it is determined that the filed tax return will result in a JC refund claim, JC procedures will apply. Closing agreements in these cases must be submitted to the JCT prior to being signed by the Service. For a Full Acceptance return, once the post-filing review is complete, the Account Coordinator will prepare the necessary documents for submission to Joint Committee Review. For a Partial Acceptance return, once all of the remaining issues have been fully resolved, the report will be sent to the JCT. Additional information relative to required documentation for CAP cases is located on the LB&I Joint Committee Review website at Case Procedures for CAP Cases. 4.36.3.6.4 (09-23-2015) Taxpayer Information - Form 4665 Report Transmittal Requirements Form 4665, Report Transmittal, (also known as the transmittal letter or T-Letter) will explain the cause or causes of the overassessments. If the overassessments result from a net operating loss, the economic reason for such loss must be briefly explained. Information concerning the financial history and changes in capital structure of corporations will be furnished in every case. This should include: Date and place of incorporation A brief statement of the principal business activity and/or principal products and any major changes in these during years under examination If stock is closely held, who controls the corporation Names of subsidiaries or affiliates (if numerous, state the number and indicate where names can be found in case file) Any changes in capital structure such as mergers, acquisitions, dispositions, etc, during the years under examination or survey Whether the stock is publicly held and on which exchange it is listed If an issue arises as to the proper carryback period of losses or credits of a newly acquired member of a consolidated group, the report will state whether the newly acquired corporation was organized by or for a preexisting member of the consolidated group. 4.36.3.6.4.1 (09-23-2015) Contact Information - Examination Team The team manager's and examiner’s name, address and telephone numbers must be entered on Form 4665, Report Transmittal, or survey form. The name and title of the taxpayer’s corporate officer who is to receive correspondence must also be included on Form 4665. 4.36.3.6.4.2 (09-23-2015) Short Taxable Periods Short taxable periods have numerous possible tax consequences. In order to fully understand the tax implications of the tax years reported, the examination report will disclose the existence and cause of any short taxable period. 4.36.3.6.4.3 (09-23-2015) Large, Unusual or Questionable Items Any large, unusual or questionable items (LUQ) will be fully explained, even if not adjusted, on Form 4665. 4.36.3.6.5 (06-21-2021) Joint Committee Spreadsheets Spreadsheets for regular tax and Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT) must be included with the case. Joint Committee spreadsheets can be found on the IRS Knowledge Management website at: Joint Committee Virtual Library, for individual, corporate, and life/non-life insurance groups. Additional Joint Committee spreadsheets should be prepared if the taxpayer has credits carried from numerous years. Separate spreadsheets should also be prepared for foreign tax credits involving different categories or baskets. 4.36.3.6.6 (09-23-2015) Transcripts of Accounts The examination team must check the transcript against information in the case file to ensure that all deficiencies, overassessments, claims paid, and refunds or credits, including tentative allowances and abatements, are properly reflected in the tax computation for the RAR and JC spreadsheets. 4.36.3.6.7 (05-04-2010) Change of Accounting Copies of Form 3115, Change of Accounting Method, and approval memorandum from Counsel will be included in the case file. 4.36.3.7 (06-21-2021) Reporting Prior to Resolution Of All Issues Certain cases can be reported to the JCT prior to the resolution of all issues. These cases include: Cases with unagreed issues - minimum refund - see IRM 4.36.3.7.1. Tentative allowances from unexamined source years - report required (Coordinated Industry Case (CIC) or Large Corporate Compliance (LCC) cases only) - see IRM 4.36.3.7.2. Request for refund - claims from unexamined source or refund years -modified expedite refund report - IRM 4.36.3.7.3. 4.36.3.7.1 (06-21-2021) Cases with Unagreed Issues - Minimum Refund Upon completion of the examination, if the taxpayer is entitled to an IRC 6405(a) refund, and there are unagreed issues, the case may be a "minimum refund" case. A minimum refund is an amount that the taxpayer is due to receive after offsetting any potential unagreed deficiency. The taxpayer would receive the net minimum refund amount regardless of the outcome of the unagreed issues. A minimum refund may be processed before the case is sent to Appeals if: The unagreed issues require a substantial period of time to resolve (one year or more for CIC or LCC cases, six months or more for all other cases), and the delay would deprive the taxpayer of a timely refund to which it is clearly entitled, in spite of the resolution of the unagreed issues, and The taxpayer signs Form 870 indicating agreement with the minimum refund. See examples below for determining the "minimum" refund due the taxpayer. Example 1 Year 1 Year 2 Total Agreed Overassessment (4,500,000) (2,000,000) (6,500,000) Unagreed Deficiency 1,000,000 500,000 1,500,000 Total results of examination (3,500,000) (1,500,000) (5,000,000) Minimum amount entitled to receive 5,000,000 Example 2 Agreed overassessment (3,000,000) Unagreed overassessment (2,000,000) Total results of examination (5,000,000) Minimum amount entitled to receive 3,000,000 If the minimum refund exceeds $2 million ($5 million for C corporations), and the taxpayer has indicated agreement with the examination team’s findings by signing Form 870, Joint Committee Review must report the refund to the JCT before releasing the unagreed issues to Appeals. The supplemental report will be made by the office that makes the final determination of the taxpayer’s liability (that includes agreed or unagreed issues) for the year(s) previously reported to the JCT. Once JCT clearance is received on the minimum refund report, the examination team must process the minimum refund and ensure that the overassessment posts to the master file before the unagreed issues can be forwarded to Appeals. The case file must be clearly documented and verification included in the case file that the minimum refund has been issued to the taxpayer. A minimum refund may also apply when there are unfinished flow-thru entity examinations. See IRM 4.36.4.11 for TEFRA and non-TEFRA flow-thru suspense procedures. 4.36.3.7.1.1 (09-23-2015) Documentation Requirements on Minimum Refund Cases If a taxpayer indicates agreement to issues in the examination report but refuses to sign the Form 870 indicating formal agreement with the minimum refund, the examiner will document the taxpayer’s indication of agreement as well as their reason for not signing Form 870. In this situation, the examiner will treat the entire case as unagreed, including the "agreed issues," and write up all issues in unagreed report format. The examination team will advise taxpayers that in order for Appeals to accept the case, they will be required to provide an adequate response to all issues in the protest, even the ones the taxpayer agreed to informally. A proper protest must be secured from the taxpayer and the appropriate rebuttal must be prepared by the examination team prior to forwarding the case to Appeals. Appeals will return the case if all issues are not addressed. If the taxpayer refuses to address all issues in the unagreed report, and refuses to sign the Form 870, the examination team should consider other appropriate actions such as the issuance of a statutory notice of deficiency or statutory notice of claim disallowance. 4.36.3.7.2 (09-23-2015) Tentative Allowances from Unexamined Source Years-Report Required A case can be submitted to Joint Committee Review with tentative allowances from unexamined source years, if: It qualifies as a Joint Committee case without regard to the carryback from the unexamined source years, and The examination of the source years will not be completed for a substantial period of time (six months or one year for CIC/LCC taxpayers). When an NOL, capital loss, or credit carryback is allowed subject to future examination of the subsequent year, the examination report, (Form 4549-A) should contain the following statement: "The net operating loss (or capital loss or credit) carryback from the year ending XX/XX/XXXX, reflected herein, is subject to correction upon examination of the tax return from which it originated." If, as a result of the examination, the tentative allowances are reduced below the jurisdictional amount, the examination team will notify Joint Committee Review in writing. Otherwise, these source years and their carrybacks will be submitted for review at the completion of their examination or survey. If the current examination would not be a Joint Committee case but for those carrybacks, the case should not be submitted to Joint Committee Review for review until the examination action is completed on the subsequent source years. 4.36.3.7.3 (09-23-2015) Request for Refund – Claims from Unexamined Source or Refund Years – Modified Expedite Refund Report The Service can issue a conditional refund in excess of $2 million ($5 million for C corporations) prior to the completion of the examination or survey action if: The taxpayer has requested the refund. The examination team, in their discretion, are satisfied that the claim issues resulting in the refund will reasonably lead to allowance of all or a substantial part of the claimed refund. No disadvantage to the government will occur. The taxpayer posts security. See Exhibit 4.36.3-1. The examination will not be completed within six months from the date the taxpayer requests the refund. There is sufficient time on the statute of limitations to complete the examination. This procedure is also applicable if the taxpayer files a claim after the due date to correct errors on its original return. An amended return filed before the due date does not require that a report be submitted to the JCT. A Modified Expedite Refund Report will be prepared by Joint Committee Review and submitted to the JCT. A Supplemental Report may be required at the completion of the examination. See Exhibit 4.36.3-2 for the procedures to be followed. 4.36.3.7.4 (09-23-2015) Posting of Security Modified Expedite Refund Report The taxpayer is required to post a bond or other similar security for the amount of the refund as a condition for submitting a modified expedite refund report. The director of field operations (DFO) or area director is responsible for determining the sufficiency of collateral. Refer to IRC 7101, the regulations thereunder and IRM 5.6.1, Collateral Agreements and Security Type Collateral, for further guidance. At the discretion of the DFO or area director, an additional amount of bond or security may be required with respect to interest on the refund in the event all or part of the refund must be repaid. This amount should be measured by the reasonably anticipated time to complete the examination and the interest rate currently in effect under IRC 6621. The posting of the bond must be accomplished prior to the submission of the claim to Joint Committee Review. A copy of the security agreement signed by the taxpayer must accompany the modified expedite refund report. The security agreement will be executed on behalf of the IRS subsequent to the expiration of the 30-day period after the submission of the report. The refunds must not be released until Joint Committee Review notifies the examination team that the appropriate documents may now be executed and such action has been taken. It is necessary to submit a copy of the executed security or collateral agreement with the modified expedite refund report. The agreement should reflect the amount of the proposed refund, plus previously assessed interest, if any, and estimated refund interest, if required. The agreement must be executed by the taxpayer prior to submission. Upon expiration of the 30-day period after submission of the report, the DFO or area director having jurisdiction over the case should execute the agreement on behalf of the IRS. Coordination with local counsel in the development of the security agreement is required. Any security or collateral agreement needs to specify that in fully agreed cases the agreement will not terminate until the JCT determines (if required by law) that it has taken no exception to the results of the examination. See Exhibit 4.36.3-1 for a sample security agreement. 4.36.3.8 (06-21-2021) Submission of Case to Joint Committee Review Once the examination of the agreed or partially agreed Joint Committee case is complete, the examination team requests a mandatory Joint Committee review by following the instructions on the IRS Knowledge Management website at:Joint Committee Virtual Library. 4.36.3.8.1 (06-21-2021) Electronic Referral Case Review (LB&I Cases, Except LB&I IIC) All LB&I business units will submit electronic referral reforms to the *LB&I Joint Committee Paperless mailbox. All groups, except for IIC, will keep their cases in status 10 or 12 during the entire JC review process and the JC specialist (JCS) will review the case electronically via email, IMS, or other electronic means. When the case clears Joint Committee, the specialist will email instructions and necessary document files to the examiner, and the groups will close the case through regular processing procedures. When the exam group is ready for a case to be reviewed by a JCS, the JC Electronic Referral Form must be completed and emailed to *LB&I Joint Committee Paperless mailbox, (as noted on the link on the JC Electronic Referral Form). Examiners should use the JC netting spreadsheet (JC Netting Spreadsheet) to help determine the jurisdictional amount to ensure the case is subject to JC Review (JCR). Survey after assignment and examined agreed closed JC reviews must be requested via the JC paperless mailbox when all field work has been completed. During the JCR process, the case will remain in ERCS status 10 (survey) or 12 (examined agreed) and the exam group will be responsible for the case and all related statutes. An Aging Reason Code (ARC) 27, Awaiting Joint Committee Clearance, has been designated for these cases. This ARC indicates that all field work has been completed and the case is now in the JCR process. When the JC Electronic Referral Form is submitted to the JC paperless mailbox, the exam group must update ERCS to reflect ARC 27. The revenue agent will receive an e-mail from JCR acknowledging receipt of the referral form after it’s been pre-screened. The JC manager will send an e-mail to the revenue agent, team manager and the assigned JCS when the referral is assigned. The e-mail will advise the revenue agent to add the JCS to the case in IMS. The JCR will be conducted via documents obtained through IMS, email or other electronic submission. The revenue agent must place documents needed for the JCR in IMS as outlined in the Electronic Referral Form. If a document cannot be uploaded into IMS, it may be sent to the JCS in the most efficient manner possible (e-mail, mail, Skype, E-fax, or other means). Large documents not conducive to scanning may be mailed to the JCS. The JCS will contact the revenue agent to secure additional documents as needed. The JCS will input their time and attendance into IMS. The time to conduct the review will be charged to the case. If the review cannot be completed due to technical, computational, or procedural errors, a Notice of Suspended Referral (NSR) Form will be sent to the revenue agent and team manager. The exam group must update ERCS to remove ARC 27 if a NSR is issued. When the errors have been corrected, the exam group should resubmit the NSR to the JC Paperless mailbox and update ERCS to reflect ARC 27. Once the JCS has completed the review, the JCS will submit the case(s) to the JCT. When the JCS receives the clearance letter or staff review memorandum (SRM) from JCT, they will advise the revenue agent and team manager, prepare the appropriate letter for the revenue agent to submit to the taxpayer, and upload the JCR documents to IMS SAIN 022. The exam group will remove ARC 27 and then close the case to CCP by placing the following documents at the top of the case file in this order: Letter 1574P - JCS prepares and the revenue agent sends to the taxpayer after clearance letter is received Clearance Letter or SRM - (Subject to Disclosure Procedures) JC Report – (Subject to Disclosure Procedures) Letter 1573P - JCS prepares and the revenue agent sends to the taxpayer when the case is sent to JCT Where applicable, any spreadsheets or other case documents that were corrected by the JCS Any general JC questions should be submitted to the*LB&I Joint Committee Assistance mailbox if the examination has not yet been concluded or a JCS is not yet assigned to the case. 4.36.3.8.2 (06-21-2021) Closed Case Review/Electronic Referral Case Review (LB&I IIC, SB/SE and TE/GE Cases) When the exam group is ready for a case to be reviewed by a JCS, LB&I IIC, SB/SE and TE/GE must complete the JC Electronic Referral Form and email it to the *LB&I Joint Committee Paperless mailbox. LBI IIC, SB/SE and TE/GE cases will be updated to status 21 and the groups will mail the physical case file directly to the assigned JCS as per email instructions from the JC team manager. The examiner will no longer mail the case to JCR in Chicago, IL. Examiners should use the netting spreadsheet (JC Netting Spreadsheet) to help determine the jurisdictional amount to ensure the case is subject to JCR. Survey after assignment and examined agreed JC case reviews must be requested via the *LB&I Joint Committee Paperless mailbox when all field work has been completed. The examiner will receive an e-mail from JCR acknowledging receipt of the referral form. The JC manager will send an e-mail to the examiner, team manager and JCS when the referral is assigned to a JCS. The e-mail will include instructions on mailing the case directly to the assigned JCS. When the case is mailed to the JCS, ERCS should be updated to Status 21, In-transit to Technical Services with the Technical Services Code (TSC) 901, and all RGS records should be archived. The JCS will update ERCS to Status 26 upon receipt of the case and it will remain in that status during the JCR process. If the review cannot be completed due to technical, computational, or procedural errors, a Case Return Transmittal (CRT) form will be sent to the examiner and team manager. JCR will update ERCS to status 10 (survey) or status 12 (examined) and mail the case back to the examination group. Upon correction of the errors or if the case no longer needs a JC review, the examiner must resubmit the CRT to the *LB&I Joint Committee Paperless mailbox. On a case-by-case basis, the case file may be retained by the JCS while the errors are corrected. Once the JCS has completed the review, the JCS will submit the case(s) to the JCT and send Letter 1573P to the taxpayer when the case is sent to JCT. When the JCS receives the clearance letter or SRM from the JCT, the JCS will issue Letter 1574P to the taxpayer, update ERCS to Status 51 and close the case to CCP. 4.36.3.8.3 (06-21-2021) Joint Committee Review Contact Information To contact Joint Committee Review for any JC related questions, send an email to the Joint Committee Assistance mailbox at: *LB&I Joint Committee Assistance. 4.36.3.9 (09-23-2015) Inquiries from Joint Committee Review There are times when it may be necessary for the Joint Committee Specialist to contact the examination team for additional information or clarification regarding a Joint Committee case. Inquiries will be treated with the highest priority. The need for additional information or clarification may arise while the case is being reviewed by Joint Committee Review or as a result of a formal or informal inquiry the Joint Committee Review may have received from the JCT. All inquiries should be treated as a priority. There may be times when it is more expedient for the examination team to communicate directly with the JCT. Joint Committee Review will arrange for this contact and remain involved to ensure the staff attorney receives a timely and satisfactory response. Caution: All IRS personnel should remember that the JCT Staff Attorneys are congressional staff and any inquiry from them constitutes a congressional inquiry. 4.36.3.9.1 (06-21-2021) Types of Inquiries There are two types of inquiries from Joint Committee Review: Informal – Telephone or email Formal – Written memorandum via a Case Return Transmittal (CRT) or Notice of Suspended Referral (NSR) See IRM 4.36.4.2 for case return criteria, 4.36.3.9.2 (06-21-2021) Proposed Changes to the RAR If the examination team does not agree with the position of Joint Committee Review or the JCT regarding proposed changes to the RAR and the matter cannot be resolved on a mutually satisfactory basis, the dispute will be elevated. 4.36.3.10 (06-21-2021) Disclosure of Correspondence with Joint Committee on Taxation Generally, any IRS records generated during an examination or other process giving rise to the credit or refund should be considered agency records subject to the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). Informal or formal correspondence, including email, from the JCT are not considered agency records subject to FOIA and should not be released to the taxpayer without the written permission of the JCT. If the JCT communication contains a legend that says the document should be treated as a Congressional record and is beyond the scope of FOIA, it should be treated as such. However, the absence of the legend is not legally determinative. If a JCT document does not contain a legend, IRS practice is generally to treat the JCT document and any response thereto as a Congressional record. See IRM 11.3.13.3.5 for further guidance. When the JCT raises an issue on a case, the Service has two options: Agree to adopt that position and present it to the taxpayer as the position of the Service; or Reply to the JCT with the reasons for disagreement. Any documents created by the Service in connection with a response to any JCT correspondence should also not be released to the taxpayer without written permission of the JCT. JCT correspondence and related records should not be released in response to non-FOIA requests (i.e., requests under IRC 6103(e) or the Privacy Act) without the written permission of the JCT. Such requests should be coordinated with Chief Counsel (Procedure & Administration) prior to any response. 4.36.3.11 (09-23-2015) Referral to Taxpayer Advocate Service by the Examination Team Complete Form 911, Request for Taxpayer Advocate Service Assistance (and Application for Taxpayer Assistance Order), and refer the taxpayer to the Taxpayer Advocate Service (TAS) if, during a taxpayer contact on a case subject to Joint Committee Review: The taxpayer asks to be referred to the TAS The taxpayer meets TAS case criteria (see IRM 13.1.7) You cannot resolve the issue See Taxpayer Advocate Service Knowledge Base for more information. Do not refer a taxpayer to TAS if you are able to resolve the taxpayer's problem or take steps to resolve the taxpayer's problem within 24 hours, unless the taxpayer asks to be referred to TAS. 4.36.3.12 (09-23-2015) Examination/Appeals Case Coordination Appeals and Examination often have different years open for the same taxpayer; however, when the taxpayer files a tentative refund or refund claim affecting the years under Appeals jurisdiction which is attributable to the year under examination, then the examination team needs to consider the situation in light of Joint Committee reporting requirements. See IRM 8.7.9.6 for details. Exhibit 4.36.3-1 Sample Security Agreement This is only an example of a security agreement where an Irrevocable Letter of Credit will be posted as collateral. Any agreement that is drafted must, at a minimum, contain the termination events in paragraph 6. Counsel must be involved in the drafting of the agreement. AGREEMENT This AGREEMENT is hereby entered into between (name of taxpayer) (hereinafter "taxpayer" ), having an address at (taxpayer’s address) and the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (hereinafter USA), having an address in care of its agent, Director, Field Operations (Industry) of Internal Revenue (hereinafter DFO), (industry headquarters address). Whereas on (date), the taxpayer filed a Form 1120X, Amended U. S. Corporate Tax Return for the tax year ending (date of year end) (hereinafter (YYYYMM) tax year), claiming (reason and amount), resulting in a refund of income tax for the (YYYYMM) period in the amount of (amount of refund) (hereinafter the (YYYYMM refund); and Whereas the examination of the (YYYYMM) tax year has not commenced; and Whereas the taxpayer has requested the (YYYYMM) refund be issued prior to the initiation and conclusion of the examination of the tax return for the (YYYYMM) tax year; and Whereas the taxpayer desires to furnish an Irrevocable Letter of Credit (hereinafter the letter) to the DFO in order to induce the issuance of the (YYYYMM) refund. Now, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants, promises, obligations, and conditions contained herein, the parties hereby agree as follows: 1. Prior to the issuance of the (YYYYMM) refund, the taxpayer shall deliver to the DFO the letter consistent with the terms set forth herein. The letter shall be in favor of the DFO, and the DFO will hold the aforesaid letter in safekeeping in accordance with the terms and conditions herein. 2. The letter to be provided to the DFO shall be for the total amount ($ amount), which represents the sum of the following ($) amount of the tax to be refunded, plus ($), the estimated interest to the date of the refund. 3. The letter is given to indemnify the Internal Revenue Service for all or any part of the (YYYYMM) refund plus interest which may be due back to the Internal Revenue Service in the event the DFO determines there is any income tax due for the (YYYYMM) year. 4. As soon as practicable after delivery of the letter, the DFO shall commence an examination of the (YYYYMM) tax year. 5. If, as a result of the examination, the DFO determines there is a deficiency in the income tax for the (YYYYMM) tax year and notice and demand for payment thereof is issued as permitted by IRC section 6303(a), the Internal Revenue Service may draw upon the letter by draft at sight unless within 90 days from the date of the notice and demand, the taxpayer pays in full the amount(s) so determined (including statutory accruals). The draft shall be accompanied by a statement executed by the DFO (or his delegate) stating that notice and demand have been made and the taxpayer has failed to pay within 90 days of the date of such notice and demand. The foregoing statement shall be sufficient to satisfy any requirements for documentation supporting the taxpayer’s failure to pay within the 90 day period. 6. The taxpayer shall have the right to terminate the letter upon the occurrence of any of the following TERMINATION EVENTS pursuant to the PROCEDURES described below: (a) TERMINATION EVENTS (i) in the event the examination results in a fully agreed case (that is, no issues remain to which the taxpayer has not agreed), the later of, the date of payment in full of all such agreed liabilities (if any), plus statutory accruals or the completion of the review of the Joint Committee Supplemental report and release by the Joint Committee on Taxation (ii) in the event the examination does not result in a fully agreed case, the later of, the date which is 120 days after "notice and demand" have been made upon the taxpayer with respect to the final issue(s) in the case ( taking into account the taxpayer’s ability to pursue all available administrative and judicial procedures to challenge the determination(s) of the DFO in whole or in part), or the completion of the review of the Joint Committee Supplemental report and release by the Joint Committee on Taxation or (iii) in the event the Internal Revenue Manual provisions addressing the reports to the Joint Committee in cases involving claims for refund prior to completion of an examination are modified so as to no longer require the taxpayer to post a bond or similar security in order to obtain the refund prior to completion of the examination, but only upon mutual consent of the DFO and the taxpayer. (b) PROCEDURES In order to terminate the letter, the taxpayer must establish to the DFO that a termination event has occurred. Thereafter, the DFO (or his delegate) and the taxpayer shall execute a statement which sets forth the basis for the termination and the effective date for such termination. The statement shall be prepared by the taxpayer and executed by the DFO within 5 days of receipt of the taxpayer’s request to execute the statement. THE LETTER SHALL NOT BE TERMINATED UNTIL THE STATEMENT HAS BEEN FULLY EXECUTED BY THE PARTIES AND DELIVERED TO THE DFO . 7. The funds under the letter shall continue to remain available to the DFO until the letter is terminated pursuant to the provisions of paragraph 6. In the event the funds may cease to be available to the DFO (i.e. due to the expiration of time or the refusal to extend), the DFO shall have the right to draw upon the full amount of funds available (or any part thereof) beginning ten (10) days prior to the expiration date unless prior to that time, the taxpayer provides another letter (hereinafter the substitute letter) which is comparable in all respects to the letter which is about to expire (hereinafter the first letter). The DFO’s determination as to whether the substitute letter is comparable to the first letter shall be binding on the parties. 8. Nothing contained herein shall be construed as a waiver of or limitation on any collection action(s) available to the DFO pursuant to applicable law. WITNESS our signatures and seals this ___ day of _____________, (year). (Taxpayer Name) By: ______________________________________ (Typed name of signer) (Position) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA By: _______________________________________ (Typed name of signer) Director of Field Operations (Industry) Exhibit 4.36.3-2 Procedures for Cases Involving Claims From Unexamined Source or Refund Years - Modified Expedite Refund These procedures are an accommodation to taxpayers and are not statutorily required. These procedures are only applicable when the examination team is satisfied that the claim issues resulting in the refund will reasonably lead to allowance of all or a substantial part of the claimed refund. These procedures are to be followed when taxpayers request prompt payment of Form 1120X claims under the provisions of IRM 4.36.3.7.3. Under these provisions, taxpayers are required to post bonds or other similar types of security (e.g. an irrevocable bank letter of credit) to protect the Government’s interest until resolution of the claim. In these cases, typically Coordinated Industry Cases or Large Corporate Compliance cases, examination or survey of the claim will not be completed within six months from the date of the taxpayer’s request. To invoke Modified Expedite Refund procedures the taxpayer must file a claim and request that it be paid prior to a final determination. The taxpayer is required to provide a draft of the Security Agreement. In addition, the taxpayer will furnish a draft of the surety bond or other form of collateral to the examining officer, who will arrange a meeting with the appropriate Counsel Office to review the drafts. A Joint Committee Specialist may participate in the meeting. Since a Security Agreement is a legal document, it must contain, at a minimum, that specific language identified as mandatory in Exhibit 4.36.3-1. The examining officer will return the draft to the taxpayer for preparation of a final version, incorporating any additions and/or deletions provided by Counsel. The taxpayer will execute and return the approved Security Agreement and collateral documents as required. Upon receipt of the agreement and other required documents the examining officer will inform the taxpayer that the Service will execute the agreement after it has been reviewed without objection by the Joint Committee on Taxation (JCT). The examining officer will prepare a processing file and submit it to the Joint Committee Specialist staff consisting of the following documents: Three copies of the executed Security Agreement and collateral documents A memorandum, addressed to the JCR which includes a brief taxpayer history and the basis for the refund claims Note: If claims are for carrybacks of NOLs, then the economic reasons for NOLs should be stated. In addition, the facts and circumstances regarding the proposed return of funds should also be included. Copies of each Form 1120X claim and first four pages of each related Form 1120 tax return and Form 4626, Alternative Minimum Tax Current transcript (no more than 30 days old) for each claim year Form 5344, Examination Closing Record, for each claim year Note: Since this is being used merely for processing purposes the examiner should only complete the taxpayer information section and Box 15. Forms 872, Consent to Extend the Time to Assess Tax, extending the statute(s) sufficient to allow completion of the examination Note: This includes the source year for any NOL, Foreign Tax Credit or Capital Loss carrybacks. These procedures DO NOT apply to years where the statute is open by claim only. See IRM 4.36.3.5 and IRM 25.6.23 for statute requirements. The statutes must be protected for all years, including the source year(s), until the supplemental report has been released by the JCT. Joint Committee Review will prepare a Modified Expedite Refund Request Report to the JCT. A copy of the Security Agreement and collateral documents executed by the taxpayer (but not yet executed by the Service) will be attached to the report. If the JCT does not raise concerns about payment of the refund(s) within 30 days from the date the JCT receives the Modified Expedite Refund Request report, the Joint Committee Specialist will notify the examiner that the appropriate documents may now be executed on behalf of the Service by the executive (or authorized delegate) having jurisdiction over the case. The examining officer will provide the taxpayer with a copy of the fully executed documents. Joint Committee Review will coordinate the processing of the refund through Case Processing Support. The examination team will continue to be responsible for obtaining all necessary letter of credit extensions and statute extensions until the case is closed. Exhibit 4.36.3-3 Sample Request For Advanced Review of Closing Agreement Internal Revenue Service Memorandum Date: To: Senior Refund Counsel, Joint Committee on Taxation Thru: Joe Brown, Joint Committee Specialist From: Mary Smith, LB&I Team Manager ________________________________________ Subject: Request for Advance Review of Closing Agreement - Taxpayer, Inc. In accordance with IRM 4.36.3.6.2 and 4.36.4.7 we are requesting your office review the attached closing agreement in advance of a Section 6405 report. [Insert concise statement as to the issue and the source of resolution. For example, "This was a COLI issue that was resolved in the Fast Track Process.]" If you have any questions, please call me at (123) 456-7890 Attachments: Form 906 - Closing Agreement Explanation of Adjustment Exhibit 4.36.3-4 CCP Instructions for Examination Team (Only LB&I Examination Teams Except for IIC) The following documents should be placed at the top of the case file in the following order when closing a case to CCP: Letter 1574P – JC Specialist prepares and the revenue agent sends to the taxpayer after clearance letter is received. Clearance Letter (Release Letter) – The taxpayer does not get a copy of the release letter Joint Committee Report – The taxpayer does not get a copy of the report. Letter 1573P – JC Specialist prepares and the revenue agent sends to the taxpayer after case is sent to the JCT for review. Where applicable, any spreadsheets or other documents which were submitted to JCR which had to be changed. Note: The above letters are file copies. The clearance letter (release letter) and the Joint Committee Report should not be provided to the taxpayer. The following may be helpful information to consider when closing the case to CCP: Create SAIN 022 in IMS and save all the JC documents in that section. Form 3198 – Include the following statement in the Other section: "JC Case cleared and Letter 1574P issued to taxpayer" . Form 3198: Check the restricted interest box if appropriate. Update ERCS to Status 51. Mail to appropriate CCP. Complete a Form 3210 for closing and note on it that this is a JC case being closed. Attach a CCP Routing document on top of the Form 3210. Note: As of the publication of this IRM, Interim Guidance Memorandum LB&I-04-0920-0018 includes instructions for closing JC cases electronically. These instructions will be published in the next revision of IRM 4.46.5, Resolving the Examination. More Internal Revenue Manual