- 4.48.5 Intangible Property Valuation Guidelines
- 18.104.22.168 Introduction
- 22.214.171.124 Development Guidelines
- 126.96.36.199.1 Planning
- 188.8.131.52.2 Identifying
- 184.108.40.206.3 Documenting
- 220.127.116.11.4 Analyzing
- 18.104.22.168.5 Workpapers
- 22.214.171.124.6 Reviewing
- 126.96.36.199 Resolution Guidelines
- 188.8.131.52 Reporting Guidelines
Part 4. Examining Process
Chapter 48. Engineering Program
Section 5. Intangible Property Valuation Guidelines
The purpose of this document is to provide guidelines applicable to all IRS personnel that are engaged in valuation practice (hereinafter referred to as valuators), relating to the development, resolution, and reporting of issues involving intangible property valuations and similar valuation issues. Valuators must be able to reasonably justify any departure from these guidelines.
For purposes of this document, intangible property includes but is not limited to any commercially transferable interest in any items included in the following six categories:
Patents, inventions, formulae, processes, designs, patterns, trade secrets, or know-how
Copyrights and literary, musical, or artistic compositions
Trademarks, trade names, or brand names
Franchises, licenses, or contracts
Methods, programs, systems, procedures, campaigns, surveys, studies, forecasts, estimates, customer lists, or technical data
Other similar items
An item is considered similar if it derives its value not from physical attributes, but from its intellectual content or other intangible properties.
The guidelines provided here regarding identifying, documenting, and analyzing the property are applicable to all types of intangible property. The information does not provide specific details for every type of intangible property.
This document incorporates by reference, the ethical and conduct provisions, contained in the Office of Government Ethics (OGE) Standards of Ethical Conduct, applicable to all IRS employees.
Valuations of assets owned and/or transferred by or between controlled taxpayers (within the meaning of Treasury Regulation section 1.482-1(i)(5)) may present substantive issues that are not addressed in these guidelines.
Successful completion of a valuation assignment includes planning, identifying critical factors, documenting specific information, and analyzing the relevant information. All relevant activities will be documented in the workpapers.
A review appraisal may be the best approach to the assignment.
Valuators will adequately plan the valuation assignment. Their managers will supervise the staff involved in the valuation process.
Quality planning is a continual process throughout the valuation assignment.
In developing a valuation conclusion, valuators should define the assignment and determine the scope of work necessary by identifying the following
Property to be valued
Interest to be valued
Effective valuation date
Purpose of valuation
Use of valuation
Statement of value
Standard and definition of the value
Restrictions, agreements and other factors that may influence value
Sources of information
The interest to be valued may include:
Form of ownership, contractual/exploitation rights, etc.
Fractional, geographic, exclusive/non-exclusive interest
In developing a valuation conclusion, valuators should obtain the relevant information necessary to accomplish the assignment.
Valuators should begin with a general definition and analysis of what constitutes the intangible property because it can assume many forms. To have economic value, intangible property should:
Be subject to specific identification and recognizable description
Be subject to legal existence and protection, which may be incorporated within a larger entity
Be subject to private ownership and be legally transferable
Generate some measurable amount of economic benefit
Potentially enhance the value of other assets with which it is associated
The description of the property should clearly identify the particular intangible property being valued. The description should be unambiguous and provide a complete identification of relevant transactions, and geographic scope of the property, where applicable. It may also specify physical, functional, technical, or economic parameters to identify the particular intangible property.
There may be a need to define what is meant by "intangible asset" from the point of view of the Internal Revenue Code and the Treasury Regulations, specifically, IRC 936 (h)(3)(B) and Treasury Regulation section 1.482-4(b).
The valuator should be aware that certain kinds of intangible property are also referred to as intellectual property. Intellectual property is often registered under federal and state statutes for protection. This may create legal and economic attributes that relate to value.
Information relevant to the specific property being valued includes:
The cost, date, and manner of acquisition
The date on which the property is being appraised
Any additional appraisals and the date (or dates) on which the property was appraised
Information on agreements or understandings entered into (or expected to be) that relate to the use, sale or other disposition of the property, including sales of the property since the valuation date
The economic outlook of the market in general and the outlook of the specific property in particular
Such other factors which, in the opinion of the valuator, are appropriate for consideration
If the intangibles subject to valuation have been transferred between or developed by controlled taxpayers within the meaning of Treasury Regulation Section 1.482-1(i)(5), section 482 and the regulations under that section may require consideration of additional issues, including, for example, which controlled taxpayer is the owner of the intangible under Treasury Regulation Section 1.482-4(f)(3)(ii). In such cases, prior to conducting the valuation, the valuator should coordinate with the referrer to ensure that all relevant issues have been identified.
In developing a valuation conclusion, valuators should analyze the relevant information necessary to accomplish the assignment.
All factors that affect the value should be considered including:
An in-depth analysis of all rights and risks of ownership
The market conditions near the valuation date
The near-term and long-term market demand for the subject property
Effects of relevant contractual or legal restrictions
Whether the property needs additional development
If the property needs additional development, the length of time required to get the property to market
Analyze any relevant transactions including:
All material facts
Information concerning contracts and transactions, including agreements, instruments, and schedules
Legal, accounting, financial, economic opinions, and memoranda
All participants and their roles
The form of consideration paid and received
Analysis of a transaction may reveal other property or services related to the primary transaction such that a bundle of property rights or services are or should be involved.
Different types of risk assumed by the owner or acquire could impose requirements on allocation of risk. Risks that may need to be accounted for include:
R&D risks with success or failure of research activities
Manufacturability risks producing in a cost effective and consistent manner
Marketing risks from fluctuating costs, demand, and pricing; competitive risks with competitors’ responses, or introduction of new products
Risks associated with government regulation
Other legal risks such as legal activities required to secure the exclusivity of a product or process
The specific valuation approach, such as market, cost, or income should be appropriate. Judgment should be used to select the approach(es) ultimately used and the method(s) within such approaches that best indicate the value of the property. The relationship between these approaches and fair market value must be demonstrated.
Some fundamental methods utilized to value intangible property include:
Market based methods rely on identification of similar intangible property sold under similar conditions. This method requires the existence of an active market involving comparable property, e.g., royalty rates in arms-length transactions.
Cost-based methods estimate the cost to reproduce/replace or to pay to purchase the subject intangible (the "make or buy" decision), using historical costs, or reproduction costs. The cost approach for estimating fair market value may be difficult to apply due to quantification problems related to economic obsolescence or future income potential.
Income-based methods focus on the income-producing capacity of intangible property. The present value of the net economic benefit to be received over the life of the asset (cash receipts less cash outlays) can estimate the value. The income method relies on estimates, future earnings, the duration of income streams, and risks associated with the realization of the forecasted income. The income approach usually computes the net present value (NPV) of the intangible by use of the discounted cash flow (DCF) method.
Monte Carlo (or probabilistic) methods are similar to discounted cash flow methods except that they rely on probability analysis of estimated ranges to produce a statistical prediction of the expected value.
Option valuation methods apply to longer term and higher risk intangibles when early expenses are significant, and projected returns are in the distant future.
Only those approaches and methods deemed appropriate for dealing with the valuation issue in question should be analyzed in detail, and reasons should be given for using them. Also, it should be documented why other methods were rejected.
The valuator should check the sensitivity of the methods applied to various assumptions made and parameters used including sensitivity of projections, discount rates, and useful lives.
Depending on the valuation methods applied, there may be need to consider the property’s related functions in research and development; product design and engineering; manufacturing, production and process engineering; extraction; assembly; purchasing and materials management; marketing and distribution; accounting, finance, legal and management. Data pertaining to the costs related to performing the functions in question should be provided to support, if possible, the description of the functions performed and resources employed.
The valuator should identify potential comparable properties. As available and appropriate, this should include an explicit, itemized list of selection criteria employed for selecting the comparable intangible assets. In addition to general standards of comparability, namely functions, contractual terms, risks, economic conditions, and property or service, certain refinements may be applied specifically to intangible assets. The comparable intangible should:
Be used in similar products and processes within the same industry or market
Have similar profit potential (as measured by the net present value of benefits to be realized, including a consideration of capital investment and start-up expenses required and the risks to be assumed)
Have similar terms, including exploitation rights, exclusivity, geographic limitations, duration, grant-back rights, and functions or services to be performed
Be in the same stage of development and possess a similar degree of uniqueness
The market approach should consider the identification and justification of:
The existence of an active market involving comparable intangibles
Past transactions of comparable intangibles
Price information for comparable transactions
Arm's length transactions between independent parties
The cost approach begins with an estimate of the cost to reproduce the intangible. One method is using historical cost. Adjustments should be made for obsolescence.
The income approach considers:
The income generation capacity of the subject intangible and forecasts the future stream of earnings or cash flow
The expected remaining useful life of the intangible, how long the economic benefit is expected to continue, which may depend on product life cycle: introduction, growth, maturity, and decline
The risk associated with receiving anticipated benefits, as may be measured by the discount rate reflecting the opportunity cost of capital, inflation, liquidity, real interest, and risk premium
The final opinion of value should reflect the appropriateness of each method, and the veracity and reliability of the data supporting each method, leading the reader logically to the final opinion of intangible value. It should ensure applied methods' results yield similar levels of value, reconcile the results, and set forth all assumptions and limiting conditions affecting the analyses, opinions, and conclusions.
Workpapers should document the steps taken, techniques used, and provide evidence to support the facts and conclusions in the final report.
Valuators will maintain a detailed case activity record (Form 9984, Examining Officer's Activity Record) which:
Identifies actions taken and indicates time charged
Identifies contacts, including name, phone number, subject, commitments, etc.
Documents delays in the examination
The case activity record, along with the supporting workpapers, should justify time spent as commensurate with work performed.
In reviewing an intangible property valuation and reporting the results of that review, a valuator should form an opinion as to the adequacy and appropriateness of the report being reviewed and clearly disclose the nature of the review process undertaken.
In reviewing an intangible property valuation, a valuator should:
Identify the taxpayer and intended use of the valuator’s opinions and conclusions, and the purpose of the review assignment
Identify the report under review, the property interest being valued, the effective date of the valuation, and the date of the review
Identify the scope of the review process conducted
Determine the completeness of the report under review within the scope of work applicable in the review assignment
Determine the adequacy and relevance of the data and the propriety of any adjustments to the data
Determine the appropriateness of the comparable and/or valuation methods and techniques used and develop the reasons for any disagreement
Determine whether the analyses, opinions and conclusions in the report under review are appropriate and reasonable, and develop the reasons for any disagreement
In the event of a disagreement with the report’s factual representations, underlying assumptions, methodology, or conclusions, a valuator should conduct additional fact-finding, research and/or analyses necessary to arrive at an appropriate value for the property.
Valuators will make efforts to obtain a resolution of the case after fully considering all relevant facts.
The objective is to resolve the issue as early in the examination as possible. Credible and compelling work by the valuator will facilitate resolution of issues without litigation.
The valuator will work in concert with the internal customer and taxpayer to attempt to resolve all outstanding issues.
Once the valuator has all the information to be considered in resolving the issue, the valuator will use his/her professional judgment in considering this information to arrive at a specific conclusion of value.
Valuators may not have all of the information they would like to have to definitively resolve an issue. Valuators, therefore, should decide when substantially enough information is available to make a proper determination.
Valuators will employ independent and objective judgment in reaching conclusions and will decide all matters on their merits, free from bias, advocacy, and conflicts of interest.
Valuators should prepare reports of their findings.
This section requires specific information to be included or addressed in each report.
The primary objective of a valuation report is to provide convincing and compelling support for the conclusions reached.
Valuation reports should contain all the information necessary to allow a clear understanding of the valuation analyses and demonstrate how the conclusions were reached.
The extent and content of the report prepared depends on the needs of each case.
Valuation reports should clearly communicate the results and identify the information relied upon in the valuation process. The report should effectively communicate the methodology and reasoning, as well as identify the supporting documentation.
Subject to the type of report being written, valuation reports generally should contain sufficient information relating to the items in Identifying, Documenting, and Analyzing above, to ensure consistency and quality.
Reports written with respect to Reviewing above shall contain, at minimum, information relating to those items in Identifying, Documenting, and Analyzing necessary to support the assumptions, analyses and/or conclusions of the valuator.
Each written valuation report should contain a signed statement that is similar in content to the following:
To the best of my knowledge and belief:
The statements of fact contained in this report are true and correct.
The reported analyses, opinions and conclusions are limited only by the reported assumptions and limiting conditions.
I have no present or prospective interest in the property that is the subject of this report, and I have no personal interest with respect to the parties involved.
I have no bias with respect to the subject of this report or to the parties involved with this assignment.
My compensation is not contingent on an action or event resulting from the analyses, opinions or conclusions in, or the use of, this report.
My analyses, opinions, and conclusions were developed, and this report has been prepared in conformity with the applicable Internal Revenue Service Valuation Guidelines.