- 5.14.2 Partial Payment Installment Agreements and the Collection Statute Expiration Date (CSED)
- 126.96.36.199 Overview
- 188.8.131.52.1 Partial Payment Installment Agreement Requirements
- 184.108.40.206.2 Asset Equity and Partial Payment Installment Agreements
- 220.127.116.11.3 Waiver Procedures for Partial Payment Installment Agreements
- 18.104.22.168.4 Preparing Partial Payment Installment Agreements for Approval and Processing
- 22.214.171.124.5 Group Manager Approval of Partial Payment Installment Agreements
- 126.96.36.199.6 Referrals from Campus
- 188.8.131.52 Collection Statute Expiration Date (CSED): Law, Policy and Procedures
- 184.108.40.206.1 Additional CSED Information: Case Transfers To and From Appeals
- 220.127.116.11.2 CSED Expiration Legal References: 1.) 90 Day Rule for Installment Agreement CSED Extensions; 2.) Non-Installment Agreement CSEDs
- Exhibit 5.14.2-1 CSED Extension and Suspension Example
Part 5. Collecting Process
Chapter 14. Installment Agreements
Section 2. Partial Payment Installment Agreements and the Collection Statute Expiration Date (CSED)
December 18, 2015
(1) This transmits a topic based revision to IRM 5.14.2, Installment Agreements, Partial Payment Installment Agreements and the Collection Statute Expiration Date (CSED) to incorporate procedural changes based on ACA provision 1501 and to replace references to using Decision IA/ICOMPF with IAT Compliance Suite Payment Calculator for determining the length of installment agreements.
(1) This IRM has only been updated for the Affordable Care Act (ACA) Provision 1501: Requirement to Maintain Minimum Essential Coverage (Individual Shared Responsibility) (IRC §5000A and references to the use of Decision IA/ICOMP). Content unrelated to these two items were not reviewed for currency or accuracy.
(2) IRM 18.104.22.168.3(1) Updated note directing employees not to include Affordable Care Act, Shared Responsibility Penalty modules (MFT 35) to Form 900 waivers to add Mirrored MFT 65 assessments to the exclusion to Form 900.
(3) IRM 22.214.171.124 (2) Replace reference to using ICOMP/Decision IA with the IAT Compliance Suite Payment Calculator
(4) IRM 126.96.36.199 (13) c) Replace reference to using Decision IA with the IAT Compliance Suite Payment Calculator
Kristen Bailey, Director, Collection Policy
All taxpayers are expected to immediately full pay delinquent tax liabilities. When this is not possible taxpayers may be allowed to pay their liabilities over a prescribed period of time. If full payment cannot be achieved by the Collection Statute Expiration Date (CSED), and taxpayers have some ability to pay, the Service can enter into Partial Payment Installment Agreements (PPIAs). The American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 amended IRC 6159 to provide this authority.
Before a PPIA may be granted, equity in assets must be addressed and, if appropriate, be used to make payment. In some cases taxpayers will be required to use equity in assets to pay liabilities. However, as discussed below, complete utilization of equity is not always required as a condition of a PPIA. Consider levy or seizure in accordance with IRM 5.10,Seizure and Sale , and IRM 188.8.131.52.2, Notice of Levy Overview if there is significant equity in assets. If enforcement action is appropriate, a PPIA will not be granted. Follow rejection procedures in IRM 184.108.40.206, Securing Installment Agreementsand IRM 220.127.116.11,Routine and Manually Monitored Installment Agreement Dispositions, Independent Review and Appeals . In cases where PPIAs are granted after consideration of levy or seizure, document the case file as indicated in IRM 18.104.22.168.2(6).
A full Collection Information Statement is required for all PPIAs. Forms 433A and/or Form 433B must be completed to determine the taxpayer’s ability to pay (refer to IRM 22.214.171.124, Allowable Expense Overview, to determine allowable expenses.)
For all IMF accounts with an Unpaid Balance of Assessment (UBA) less than or equal to ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ , compare the current year income information provided by the taxpayer to the income on the last filed return using Command Code (CC) IRPTR and at least one of the following:
Current year tax return
In addition, compare assets included on the financial statement to the results of information secured via these CCs/Returns. If the current year income has decreased 20% or more from the last filed return income or assets are identified that were not disclosed on the financial statement, discuss and/or resolve any discrepancy with the taxpayer and document the case history. Do not request substantiation if the taxpayer can provide a reasonable explanation.
For IMF accounts with a UBA above ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ , or if there is significant equity that cannot be liquidated, the following minimum verification is required: Real property records, Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV), personal property, full credit report, AMDIS when there is a -L freeze on the account indicating open examination activity, RAR or SAR if the assessment originated in Examination or Criminal Investigation.
Conditional expenses not determined to be necessary are not allowed for PPIAs. Only necessary expenses are permitted. When taxpayers need to adjust above allowable expenses, the minimum time necessary should be provided. See IRM 5.15.1, Financial Analysis Handbook, for a discussion of necessary, conditional and other expenses and when exceptions may be appropriate.
For in-business trust fund accounts, use the guidelines in IRM 126.96.36.199(7), In-Business Trust Fund Installment Agreements Requiring Financial Analysis and Determining Ability to Pay , which state that at a minimum you should:
Verify income and expenses. Use bank statements to verify both income and expenses;
Request documentation if assets, liabilities, expenses or income appear questionable;
Complete record checks to determine ownership and equity in real and personal property, including motor vehicles;
If appropriate, request that taxpayers sell assets or borrow on equity in assets in order to make payment on the delinquent taxes;
As noted in IRM 188.8.131.52(1)(b), Summary of Agreement Criteria for Business Accounts , ensure that the taxpayer has the ability to pay current taxes as well as operating expenses and pay delinquent taxes.
ICS will not allow closing a case as an IBTF-IA PPIA (No Asset) with a back up Form 53. If the IA defaults, it must come back out for financial review before it can be placed in CNC status.
Because the installment agreement will not fully satisfy the liability, the Trust Fund Recovery Penalty (TFRP) will usually be assessed. As the potential exists for the taxpayer to accrue additional liabilities, the RO needs to ensure the ASED is extended on accounts in which the trust fund balance is below the amount in IRM 184.108.40.206, Determination to Pursue and Recommend Assessment of the TFRP. IRM 220.127.116.11.1, Considerations for In-Business Installment Agreements, provides guidance that the RO can request a signature on Form 2750, Waiver Extending Statutory Period for Assessment of Trust Fund Recovery Penalty, from all potentially responsible persons to extend the statute to the expected end-date of the agreement plus one year. For PPIAs, this date will be the expected CSED expiration.
For out-of-business trust fund accounts, use the guidelines in IRM 18.104.22.168.1(13), Trust Fund Recovery Penalties and Installment Agreements .
The taxpayer must agree to pay the maximum monthly payment based upon the taxpayer’s ability to pay. Taxpayers entering PPIAs who have defaulted an IA in the past 24 months will be required to make monthly payments via DDIA or PDIA unless they are unbanked and unemployed/self employed. If this is not possible, a PPIA may still be granted. The reason that a payroll deduction or direct debit agreement could not be secured must be documented in the case history.
Make a lien filing determination or ensure that a Notice of Federal Tax Lien (NFTL) was previously filed on all aggregate liabilities with a UBA greater than≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ . Follow NFTL procedures in IRM 22.214.171.124,Determination Criteria for Do-Not-File or Deferring the NFTL Filing .
The Campus will refer cases for revenue officer assignment in some situations. See IRM 126.96.36.199.7.
No Asset/No Equity Cases: A PPIA may be granted if a taxpayer has no assets or equity in assets; or has liquidated available assets to make a partial tax payment.
Asset Cases: A PPIA may be granted if a taxpayer does not sell or cannot borrow against assets with equity because:
the assets have minimal equity or the equity is insufficient to allow a creditor to loan funds;
the taxpayer is unable to utilize equity;
the asset has some value but the taxpayer is unable to sell the asset because it is currently unmarketable;
the asset is necessary to generate income for the PPIA and the government will receive more from the future income generated by the asset than from the sale of the asset;
it would impose an economic hardship on the taxpayer to sell property, borrow on equity in property, or use a liquid asset to pay the taxes. Economic hardship is defined in 26 C.F.R. 301.6343-1 as not meeting reasonable basic living expenses. Assets necessary for the production of income should also be included in the definition of economic hardship.
the taxpayer is on a fixed income, such as social security, and has the ability to make small monthly payments. The only other asset is the taxpayer’s primary residence and there is equity in the property. The revenue officer does a risk analysis and determines that seizing the property would cause an economic hardship because the taxpayer cannot find suitable replacement housing and meet necessary living expenses if the property would be seized.
the taxpayer’s loan payment would exceed the taxpayer’s disposable income and they would not qualify for a loan.
the revenue officer should document the case history with the basis for requiring the liquidation of equity in an asset and that it won't create an economic hardship.
) When financial analysis indicates that borrowing against or selling property should be attempted, the taxpayer will normally be required to make a good faith attempt to utilize equity before the Service will approve a PPIA. This includes applying normal business standards when applying for loans using equity as collateral. Taxpayers will also be required to submit copies of all documents that are used in the loan application process.
If the taxpayer does not comply with the requirement of making a good faith attempt to use equity in assets or is not willing to make monthly payments consistent with ability to pay, the taxpayer will be considered a "won’t pay" and seizure/levy action may be appropriate. If enforcement action is appropriate, a PPIA will not be granted. If the taxpayer is in pending IA status, follow rejection procedures in sections 188.8.131.52, Identifying Pending, Approved and Rejected Installment Agreement Proposals on IDRS,and 184.108.40.206, IDRS Monitoring. The case history should be documented with a statement as to why the PPIA was not granted.
If the taxpayer is unable to secure a loan or liquidate an asset following a good faith attempt to do so, the revenue officer will need to make a seizure/levy determination (see IRM 220.127.116.11, Actions Required Prior to Seizure by IRC 6331(j) ).
If it has been determined that enforcement action is not appropriate, a PPIA can be granted. The case history should be documented as follows: "Seizure (or levy) of (name of asset) has been considered, but it is not the appropriate resolution because (provide reason)" .
Consider securing a waiver with a PPIA where there is an asset that will come into the possession of a taxpayer after the CSED and liquidation of that asset offers the best case resolution (in lieu of liquidating existing assets to partially pay the liability).
Do not include any Affordable Care Act individual shared responsibility payment liabilities (MFT 35/Mirrored MFT65) on the waiver.
The taxpayer owes individual income tax and is the beneficiary to a trust. The taxpayer will receive a monthly distribution from the trust that would be used to fund the PPIA. The taxpayer will not be entitled to the principal of the trust for two more years. The CSED will expire in one year. The only other asset is the taxpayer’s primary residence. The equity in the property is less than the net value of the trust but is available for immediate collection action. The taxpayer has been unable to secure a loan against the equity of the property due to numerous factors such as limited income and poor credit. The risk analysis was completed by the revenue officer and the taxpayer offered to extend the statute and to liquidate the trust in two years. The waiver was secured for two additional years.
A corporation taxpayer cannot pay its payroll tax liability within the CSED. It can make partial payments for the remaining CSED period. The corporation is current with its federal tax deposits. The corporation has an interest in undeveloped real estate which is under development and will be completed in two years. The land once developed would increase significantly in value and will be immediately sold. The CSED will expire in one year. Seizing and selling the assets of the business which would include the vacant land and construction equipment would not significantly reduce the liability and would impact the business’s ability to complete the development of the property. The corporate officers offer to extend the statute to provide the opportunity to complete the development and pay the taxes along with other business debts. The trust fund recovery penalty will be addressed per IRM procedures.
A waiver is no longer required to be secured when the taxpayer’s only ability to satisfy the tax liability after the CSED expiration is through a continuation of the installment agreement and there is no significant change in ability to pay as identified through the two year financial review process.
The taxpayer cannot pay the liability within the CSED but can make monthly payments. The statute will expire in twelve months. The taxpayer has no distrainable assets. The taxpayer owes $1,800 and can pay $100 per month. Secure a PPIA for twelve months and no waiver is required. The statute would be allowed to expire.
The individual taxpayer cannot pay the liability within the CSED but can make monthly payments. The statute will expire in three years. The taxpayer owns real property with minimal equity and they cannot borrow against the equity. The taxpayer owes $10,000 and can pay $200 per month. Secure a PPIA for three years and no waiver is required. There will be a two year financial review conducted. If there is no significant change in ability to pay, the payment amount will remain unchanged until the statute expires. A waiver could not be secured during the two year financial review process unless the taxpayer’s financial condition has improved, the agreement is terminated, and a new one is granted.
The taxpayer is likely to have a significant change in their ability to pay based on a foreseeable event, but the taxpayer refuses to sign a waiver. Secure a PPIA and note the case history with respect to the likely improvement in financial condition. This issue will be considered during the 2 year financial review.
The waiver can only be secured at the inception of the PPIA and not during the two year review process, unless a new PPIA is executed at that time. A waiver should not be obtained at the time the PPIA is reinstated. The length of the extension must be based on the time that it will take to make payments and cannot exceed five years plus one year to provide for other administrative actions.
When a Form 900, Tax Collection Waiver, is secured, the CSED must be updated on ICS for all periods that are extended by the waiver by:
Selecting the module to be updated; then
Select >MODULE DETAIL<, >UPDATE MODULE DATE<, and >NEW IDRS CSED DATE (TC 550)<; and then
Update the CSED date, and
Select the appropriate definer code from the drop down list. For FS 2 (married filing joint) modules, selection of Definer Code 01 (Form 900), will generate a prompt to input "Waiver Signed Date" and "Waiver Secured for" information (Primary, Secondary or Both). Update as appropriate.
Click "Save" to save your information.
Ensure the taxpayer is in compliance with filing, withholding, federal tax deposit and estimated tax payment requirements (see IRM 18.104.22.168.1, Compliance and Installment Agreements).
Document ICS with the justification for the PPIA as the best case resolution.
Include all balance due accounts for which the taxpayer is liable, including pre-assessed modules.
Use installment agreement closing option A (preferable method) or B on ICS.
Agreement Locator Numbers (ALNs) are four digit codes (XXYY) that indicate specific types of processing will occur at the Campus level. ICS selects the proper ALN for PPIAs.
For PPIAs granted to taxpayers whose accounts are not on ICS, choose the proper ALN for PPIAs as follows:
use ALN "12" in the "YY" position of the ALN;
generally use "02" in the "XX" position unless one of the conditions in Exhibit 5.14.1-2 or in the chart below, are present;
generally use "12" in the "XX" position of the ALN for multiple condition PPIAs (see table below for exceptions, including for Direct Debit and Payroll Deduction Agreements).
Type of PPIA ALN PPIA with no other conditions 0212 PPIA with pre-assessed module 1212 If other conditions exist ICS will systemically assign the highest priority value for the YY indicator based on the priority list found in IRM Exhibit 5.14.1-2, Installment Agreement Locator Numbers — (ALNs). All other selected values will be systemically written in the Additional Conditions section of the Form 433-D and in the ICS history. This information will NOT be included in the taxpayer's letter. Direct Debit PPIA 0312
"03" must be used in the "XX" position for Direct Debit IAs. If other conditions exist ICS will systemically assign the highest priority value for the "YY" indicator based on the priority list found in Exhibit 5.14.1-2, Installment Agreement Locator Numbers — (ALNs) . All other selected values will be systemically written in the Additional Conditions section of the Form 433-D and in the ICS history. This information will NOT be included in the taxpayer's letter.
Payroll Deduction PPIA 1112
"11" must be used in the "XX" position for Payroll Deduction IAs. If other conditions exist ICS will systemically assign the highest priority value for the "YY" indicator based on the priority list found in IRM Exhibit 5.14.1-2,Installment Agreement Locator Numbers — (ALNs) . All other selected values will be systemically written in the Additional Conditions section of the Form 433-D and in the ICS history. This information will NOT be included in the taxpayer's letter.
Report Currently Not Collectible if PPIA defaults 1212
If other conditions exist ICS will systemically assign the highest priority value for the "YY" indicator based on the priority list found in IRM Exhibit 5.14.1-2, Installment Agreement Locator Numbers — (ALNs). All other selected values will be systemically written in the Additional Conditions section of the Form 433-D and in the ICS history. This information will NOT be included in the taxpayer's letter.
Review Suppress Indicators (RSI) instruct Campuses to reissue installment agreements under certain conditions after the two year review. ICS selects the proper RSI for PPIAs granted using ICS, however for PPIAs granted to taxpayers whose accounts are not on ICS, use RSI "5" and choose a review cycle two years in the future.
Mark the top of the Installment Agreement form (Form 433D), in red as "PPIA" .
If a Form 900 is secured in conjunction with a PPIA, a copy of the installment agreement and the original Form 900 will be sent to CCP using a manually prepared Form 3210 to:
Internal Revenue Service
2970 Market Street
Mail Stop 5-E04.114
Philadelphia, PA., 19104
The original Form 900 must be maintained for the length of the extension. (See IRM 22.214.171.124.1(2)).
If Option B on ICS is used to close the case as a PPIA, use the systemically generated Form 3210 to route the agreement to the appropriate Mail Stop at CCP. Closed case files should be routed to CCP at Mail Stop 5-E04.115.
All PPIAs require managerial approval. The group manager must review these cases to ensure that they reflect the following documentation:
thorough analysis of financial statement(s)
consideration of other available and appropriate means of collection including, but not limited to liquidation of assets, levy, and offer in compromise
the rationale for allowing the taxpayer to retain assets with equity
the RO did not ask the taxpayer to take actions that put him or her into a hardship situation
If a manager does not believe that the PPIA is the appropriate resolution follow the procedures in IRM 126.96.36.199, Independent Administrative Review after Recommended Rejection of Installment Agreement Requests. The case history should be documented with a statement as to why the PPIA was not granted.
If taxpayers have assets and request PPIAs from campus functions (including ACS) and meet the equity thresholds provided below, cases will be transferred for revenue officer assignment. (See IRM 5.19.1, Balance Due, for Campus procedures.).
These referrals from campus will be subcoded on ICS depending on where the case originated:
ICS Sub code 904: POTENTIAL SIGNIF EQTY – FRM CAMPUS
ICS Sub code 903: POTENTIAL SIGNIF EQTY – FRM ACS
Significant Equity Thresholds Used By Campus for Transfers to Revenue Officers:
For property values up to ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ and equity of at least ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ; or
For property values of ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ or greater and equity of at least ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ≡ ; and, the equity represents at least 30% of the value of the property.
The American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 amended IRC 6159 to provide the authority for the Service to enter into partial payment installment agreements (i.e., installment agreements that do not provide for full payment of the liabilities). If full payment cannot be achieved by the Collection Statute Expiration Date (CSED), and taxpayers have some ability to pay, the Service can grant Partial Payment Installment Agreements (PPIAs). IRC 6502(a)(2)(A) provides that statutory periods for collection may be extended in connection with granting installment agreements. CSED extensions are permitted only in conjunction with PPIAs and only in certain situations (see IRM 188.8.131.52.3). CSED extensions are limited to five (5) years beyond the original CSED (and where applicable, any previous extensions due to statutory suspension of the CSED) for each tax account (plus up to one year – see IRM 184.108.40.206(8)). Group Managers must approve CSED extensions. (See IRM 220.127.116.11(19). If the taxpayer enters into more than one PPIA, the CSED may be extended more than once for each balance due account as specified by IRM 18.104.22.168(7).
Be aware of the CSED when granting installment agreements. Use the IAT Compliance Suite Payment Calculator to verify that the agreement will fully pay all liabilities for which the taxpayer is liable prior to the CSED and include a copy with the case file. If the projected date for full payment is prior to the CSED the agreement may be approved. If the projected date for full payment is not prior to the CSED a Partial Payment Installment Agreement may be considered (see IRM 22.214.171.124).
When working CSED issues pertaining to International cases, taxpayers residing outside of the United States and Commonwealth Territories, or taxpayers who may have lived outside the United States for the applicable length of time since assessment and are now living back in the United States, refer to IRM 126.96.36.199.7, Collection Statute Expiration, Taxpayer Living Outside United States, for processing procedures.
The Internal Revenue Service limits the length of installment agreements to the 10-year statutory collection period except in connection with PPIAs.
IRC 6502(a)(2)(A) provides that statutory periods for collection may be extended in connection with the granting of an installment agreement. CSED extensions are permitted only in conjunction with Partial Payment Installment Agreements in certain situations (See IRM 188.8.131.52.3).
On March 9, 2002, the Job Creation and Worker Assistance Act amended Internal Revenue Code (IRC) 6331(k)(3) by referencing IRC 6331 (i)(5) to state the statute of limitations for collection (CSED) is suspended for an installment agreement during these timeframes: (a) proposed installment agreement is pending; (b) thirty days following the rejection of an installment agreement; (c) thirty days following termination of an installment agreement; and (d) during any appeal of the termination or rejection of the installment agreement.
The systemic suspension of the CSED during the time a proposed IA is pending is built into Masterfile (MF) processing and is triggered by the TC971 AC043, TC972 AC043 or TC971 AC063, and TC 971 AC 163 (as applicable) dates. No TC550 posts to Masterfile. The suspension systemically updates the CSED field on IDRS.
Do not secure CSED waivers on non-PPIA agreements. Generally, do not secure waivers on PPIAs; however, a Form 900 waiver may be secured only in connection with partial payment installment agreements that extend beyond the CSED in certain situations (see IRM 184.108.40.206.3).
CSEDs may not be extended during installment agreements. CSEDs may be extended only in connection with new PPIAs after mailing CP 523 or Letter 2975, during the default period if a new PPIA is entered into (not a reinstatement), or after agreements are terminated. (See IRM 220.127.116.11(15)). CSED waivers may be secured for any or all of the balance due accounts:
included in the original agreement; and
not included in the original agreement.
(See IRM 18.104.22.168(17) and IRM 22.214.171.124(7) regarding the manner in which a "new" agreement can include the balances due in an "old" agreement; and IRM 126.96.36.199 regarding defaults, terminations and CSED extensions.)
If the taxpayer enters into more than one PPIA, the period for collection may be extended in connection with each PPIA so long as the total of the extensions for each balance due account is not longer than 5 years from the original CSED, plus the periods described in IRM 188.8.131.52(8) through (10).
Extensions of the statutory period for collection are limited to no more than five years, plus up to one year to account for changes in the agreement. (See IRM 184.108.40.206(10).)
Prior suspensions of CSEDs due to offers in compromise or legal proceedings do not:
bar extensions of CSEDs with PPIAs,
change the length of extensions beyond the limits provided in this section.
Therefore, CSED suspensions may result in longer periods for collection than provided otherwise by this section (as illustrated in Exhibit 5.14.2–1). For example, the CSED is suspended:
while the IRS and the Office of Appeals consider a request for an installment agreement or an offer in compromise
from the date the taxpayer requests a CDP hearing until Appeals issues a CDP Notice of Determination or, if the taxpayer seeks review in the Tax Court, until the Tax Court's decision becomes final, including appeals to a United States Court of Appeals
from the date the taxpayer request's innocent spouse relief until a final Notice of Determination is issued or, if the taxpayer seeks review in the Tax Court, the date the Tax Court decision becomes final and for 60 days thereafter. If, however, the taxpayer appeals the Tax Court's decision to a United States Court of Appeals, the collection period will begin to run 60 days after the filing of the appeal unless a bond is posted with the appeal
for tax periods included in a bankruptcy while the automatic stay is in effect, plus an additional six months
The IRS is unable to collect for 6 months while the taxpayer is in bankruptcy and the automatic stay is in effect. Thus, the period for collection is suspended for 12 months under IRC sec. 6503(h). After adjusting the CSED to reflect the bankruptcy, the CSED may still be extended by agreement for a period of five years if there is a partial payment installment agreement and the other criteria for securing a Form 900 waiver have been met.
See IRC section 6503 for other examples of situations that suspend the CSED.
All tax modules for which the taxpayer is liable must be included in extension calculations on CC ICOMP. (See IRM 220.127.116.11(13) regarding ICOMP calculations.) Extensions will be calculated from the latest CSED balance due account modules, but the waiver extends the CSED for all assessments on the tax module. On accounts with multiple CSED dates determine if the earliest CSED is still valid. To verify to CSED consider using the CCalc found at http://mysbse.web.irs.gov/Collection/toolsprocesses/csedcalculator/ccalc/default.aspxon . If a TC534 with a 0 or dollar amount appears on the module the CSED has expired for the associated CSED. Do not include this amount in your calculations. If there is more than one assessment on tax modules, and part of the balance due is from the earlier assessment(s), list these assessment dates on the waiver, along with the latest assessment date.
All tax modules for which the taxpayer is liable may be combined on one Form 900. Ensure it is clear which tax periods and assessment dates correspond to which CSEDs on the form.
Form 900 Waiver will only be executed in connection with PPIAs. (See IRM 18.104.22.168.3 for additional information.) Use IDRS CC ICOMP to determine payment schedules, and share the results of ICOMPs with the taxpayers. Provide taxpayers with information regarding the manner in which penalty and interest are computed.
Using CC ICOMP, two methods – described in (a) and (b) immediately below – may be used for determining the length of CSED extensions. For both methods:
Include all tax modules in the computation;
Compute the extension separately for each module;
Begin the computation using the module with the earliest CSED; and,
Add additional modules to the computation until all are included.
Method (A) provides for computation of separate CSEDs for each module. Method (B) provides for extending CSEDs to one date for all modules.
Method (A) – Extend CSEDs on all modules to separate dates (for each module) up to one year past the latest CSED on the module, ensuring no CSED extension is longer than five years (plus one year as specified in IRM 22.214.171.124(8)).
Method (B): Extend CSEDs to the same date for all modules, ensuring no CSED extension is longer than five years, plus one year.
CC ICOMP does not work on MFT 55, NMF, Status 72, or accounts on which maximum failure to pay penalty has been assessed. For these types of accounts the IAT Compliance Suite Payment Calculator may be used.
Form 900 waivers may be requested only with regard to certain PPIAs (See IRM 126.96.36.199.3 for examples where a waiver would be considered).
Notify taxpayers they have the right to refuse to sign a waiver.
If an installment agreement request is being considered and a taxpayer refuses to sign a waiver, inform the taxpayer the request will be considered and recommended for rejection, then refer the case to the independent administrative reviewer. (See IRM 188.8.131.52(6), Routine and Manually Monitored Installment Agreement Dispositions, Independent Review and Appeals.)
Taxpayers whose agreements were previously terminated, with all appeal timeframes exhausted regarding the termination (see IRM 184.108.40.206, Defaulted Installment Agreements, Terminated Agreements and Appeals of: Proposed Terminations (Defaults), and Terminated Installment Agreements ), may be granted new installment agreements (not reinstatements). CSED waivers may only be secured along with new partial payment installment agreements and only in certain situations (see IRM 220.127.116.11.3), even if there were prior extensions of CSEDs.
If installment agreements are in default (but 90 days have not passed since issuance of CP 523/Letter 2975, see IRM 18.104.22.168, Defaulted Installment Agreements, Terminated Agreements and Appeals of: Proposed Terminations (Defaults), and Terminated Installment Agreements ) reinstatements may include new periods. (See IRM 22.214.171.124(5) regarding securing waivers with new agreements.)
Partial payment installment agreements that extend beyond the original CSED (and where applicable, any previous extension due to statutory suspensions) require group manager approval. Delegation Order 25-2 (Rev. 1) delegates authority to execute Form 900 waivers to Collection, Examination and Specialty Programs Field Group Managers; Technical Services and Planning and Special Programs (PSP) Group Managers; GS-11 Revenue Agents or GS-11 Tax Compliance Officers in Technical Services and PSP functions, and Campus Compliance Services Department Managers. See IRM 126.96.36.199, Delegations of Authority for Special Topics Activities for delegated authority for other functions. In addition, Delegation Order 25-2 provides authority to approve Form 900 waivers to Collection, Examination, Specialty Programs Field Group Managers; Technical Services Group Managers; Insolvency Unit Managers, and Field Compliance Services Department Managers.
Revenue Officers will:
complete Form 900, including printing the Area Director’s name on the line titled "Area Director’s name" ;
print the group manager’s name and title in the "By Delegated Representative" block (leaving room for manager’s signature);
submit the Form 900 and agreement together for Group Manager approval.
Group Managers, Case Processing Managers or Technical Services Managers will:
ensure extension computations are accurate when reviewing Forms 900 for approval;
indicate approval of Form 900 by signing in the "By Delegated Representative" block;
approve Forms 900 and related installment agreements on the same date.
When the Form 900 is approved, update the IDRS CSED date on ICS using the "Update Module Date" section and the TC 550 is uploaded to IDRS.
Regardless of the time remaining on CSEDs, timely appeals of installment agreement rejections, terminations, and proposed terminations must be referred to Appeals. When referring balance due accounts with CSEDs that expire within 120 days, notify Appeals of the imminent CSED(s). Cases will not be considered transferred to Appeals unless confirmation of transfer is received, and documented, by the referring function.
Appeals will attempt to resolve all issues prior to CSED expiration. If Appeals returns balance due accounts with CSED(s) that expire within 120 days (to referring functions) it will notify the function(s) of the imminent CSED(s). Cases will not be considered transferred to other functions (by Appeals) unless confirmation of transfer is received and documented by Appeals. (See IRM 188.8.131.52, Routine and Manually Monitored Installment Agreement Dispositions, Independent Review and Appeals, for additional Appeals information.)
CSED extensions based on waivers secured with installment agreements actually expire 90 days after the expiration of any period for collection agreed upon in writing by the Secretary and the taxpayer at the time the installment agreement was entered into. (See IRC 6502(a)(2)(A), and Treas. Reg. 301.6502-1(b)(1).) These waivers remain in effect regardless of:
whether agreements fully pay taxes, and
lengths of extensions.
For CSED extensions/waivers obtained prior to January 1, 2000 and not secured with installment agreements, the statutory period for collection will expire on December 31, 2002, or at the end of the original ten year statutory period for collection if after December 31, 2002. (See IRC 6502(a)(2) and 3461(c)(2) of RRA ‘98 ).
|EXAMPLE OF EXTENSION AND SUSPENSION OF COLLECTION STATUTE|
|Date Tax Assessed:||05-10-2005|
|Original Collection Statute Expiration Date (CSED):||05-10-2015|
|CSED suspension and (resulting extension) based on bankruptcy:||3 years (1-5-2006 to 1-5-2009|
|CSED after suspension and (resulting extension) based on bankruptcy:||5-10-2018|
|Maximum CSED extension of 5 years in connection with a partial payment installment agreement plus additional one year for payment skips, etc. See 184.108.40.206(8):||6 years|
|CSED after suspension (and resulting extension) based on the bankruptcy plus the maximum CSED extension of the partial payment installment agreement plus an additional one year for payment skips, etc.:||5-10-2024|