- 5.14.4 Withdrawals and Installment Agreements with Special Circumstances
- 220.127.116.11 Program Scope and Objectives
- 18.104.22.168.1 Background
- 22.214.171.124.2 Authority
- 126.96.36.199.3 Responsibilities
- 188.8.131.52.4 Program Management and Review
- 184.108.40.206.5 Program Controls
- 220.127.116.11.6 Terms
- 18.104.22.168.7 Acronyms
- 22.214.171.124.8 Related Resources
- 126.96.36.199 No Financial Reviews on Most IDRS Monitored Agreements
- 188.8.131.52 Installment Agreements on Below Deferral (Account Issuance) Level Taxpayers & Procedures for Uncollectible Accounts
- 184.108.40.206 Installment Agreements and Multiple Entities
- 220.127.116.11 Joint and Several Liability Relief Under IRC Section 6015 and Installment Agreement Requests
- 18.104.22.168 Withdrawal of Installment Agreement Requests
- 22.214.171.124 Establishing Installment Agreements on Restitution-Based Assessments (RBA)and Related Civil Assessments - Overview
- 126.96.36.199.1 Establishing Installment Agreements on Restitution-Based Assessments (RBA)and Related Civil Assessments - Procedures
- Exhibit 5.14.4-1 Withdrawal of Request for Installment Agreement
Part 5. Collecting Process
Chapter 14. Installment Agreements
Section 4. Withdrawals and Installment Agreements with Special Circumstances
May 17, 2017
(1) This transmits a revision for IRM 5.14.4, Withdrawals and Installment Agreements with Special Circumstances.
(1) The title of this chapter was changed to Withdrawals and Installment Agreements with Special Circumstances.
(2) Updated IRM citations throughout Chapter.
(3) Updated 188.8.131.52 to include internal control information in Program Scope and Objectives.
(4) IRM 184.108.40.206 (2) and IRM 220.127.116.11 (8) were updated to indicate that Withdrawals are only applicable to pending installment agreements.
(5) IRM 18.104.22.168 (3) was added to indicate that in the case of joint assessments, revenue officers should determine the intent of the parties when the Withdrawal is signed or requested by one of the parties to the assessment.
(6) IRM 22.214.171.124 was added to incorporate the guidance contained in Interim Guidance Memorandum SBSE-05-0315-0026, Establishing Installment Agreements on Restitution-Based Assessments and Related Civil Assessments.
Kristen E. Bailey
Director, Collection Policy
Purpose. This chapter discusses the installment agreement process for cases with special circumstances and withdrawals of installment agreements. As you use this chapter, remain alert for references to other resources, such as related IRMs and websites and access that guidance as needed to ensure a thorough understanding of topics. Specifically, IRM 5.14.4:
Discusses below deferral level taxpayers.
Describes procedures for installment agreements for multiple entities.
Discusses joint and several liability relief under IRC Section 6015.
Discusses considerations and procedures for withdrawals of installment agreements.
Establishes procedures for entering into installment agreements for restitution based assessments.
Audience. These procedures and guidance apply to IRS Field Collection Revenue Officers and Group Managers.
Policy Owner. The Director, Collection Policy is the policy owner of this IRM.
Program Owner. Collection Policy, Case Resolution Alternatives (CRA) is the program owner of this IRM.
Independent Administrative Review
Taxpayer Advocate Service
Program Goals. Installment agreements can be a viable case resolution for many delinquent accounts. By following the direction in this IRM section, employees can identify proper procedures for completing installment agreement cases for cases with special circumstances.
Installment Agreements are arrangements by which the Internal Revenue Service allows taxpayers to pay liabilities over time. Taxpayers should be encouraged to pay the liability in full to avoid the costs of an installment agreement, which include a user fee, accrual of penalties and interest, and the possible filing of a Notice of Federal Tax Lien (NFTL). If full payment cannot be achieved by the Collection Statute Expiration Date, and taxpayers have some ability to pay, Partial Payment Installment Agreements may be granted. During the course of agreements, penalties and interest continue to accrue. Generally, no levies may be served during installment agreements.
IRC § 6159, Agreements for Payment of Tax Liability in Installments.
IRC § 6201(a)(4), Assessment Authority.
Treas. Reg § 301.6343
Public Law 111-237, Firearms Excise Tax Improvement Act of 2010
18 USC § 3613, Civil Remedies for Satisfaction of an Unpaid Fine.
The Director, Collection Policy is the executive responsible for the policies and procedures to be employed by collection personnel.
Field Collection Group Managers and Territory Managers are responsible for ensuring the guidance and procedures described in this IRM are complied with.
Monthly Installment Agreement Trend Report. Sourced from CAR, CRA generates and reviews a monthly Installment Agreement trend report that captures data on the various types of installment agreements and compares year over year data on installment agreement inventory levels, the number of installment agreements initiated, default rates, full pay rates, and dollars collected. Any anomalies are identified and researched for potential causes. Negative trends are identified and causes addressed.
CRA will conduct ad hoc Installment Agreement program reviews as necessary to verify compliance with IRM requirements, address TIGTA/GAO findings, and get behind any trends that appear.
Case reviews are conducted by Group Managers to ensure compliance with this IRM.
Operational reviews are conducted by the Territory Manager and Area Director annually to evaluate program delivery and conformance to administrative and compliance requirements.
Independent Administrative Review is required of all rejected installment agreement proposals, and all rejection, default and termination decisions are subject to appeal procedures.
The Integrated Collection System (ICS) ensures that taxpayer conditions meet requirements for Streamlined or In-Business Express installment agreement processing criteria, that there are no unfiled returns, and requires group manager approval for all non-streamlined installment agreements.
The Integrated Data Retrieval System (IDRS) programming requires that all open modules be included in an installment agreement for input to be successful.
Frequently used terms used in this IRM along with their definition include:
Delinquent Taxes: balance due, ACS balance due accounts and/or notice status accounts;
Accrued Taxes: unassessed amounts due on returns or undeposited FTDs as of the date of contact;
Current Taxes: FTDs and amounts that become due after the date of contact.
This table lists commonly used acronyms and their definitions:
Acronym Definition AC Action Code ACS Automated Collection System APL Advisory Probation Liaison ALN Agreement Locator Number CAP Collection Appeals Program CCP Centralized Collection Processing CDP Collection Due Process CIS Collection Information Statement CNC Currently Not Collectible CSED Collection Statute Expiration Date CSCO Compliance Service Collection Operation DDIA Direct Debit Installment Agreement EIN Employer Identification Number IA Installment Agreement IBTF In-Business Trust Fund ICS Integrated Collection System IDRS Integrated Data Retrieval System LLC Limited Liability Company NFTL Notice of Federal Tax Lien OIC Offer-in-Compromise PPIA Partial Payment Installment Agreement RBA Restitution Based Assessment RO Revenue Officer SSN Social Security Number
IRM 4.20.4 Examination Collectibility - Installment Agreements
IRM 126.96.36.199.4 (Campuses, ACS, toll-free)
See IRM 188.8.131.52 Multi-functional Installment Agreements, which contains guidance for other functions.
Centralized Case Processing (CCP): http://mysbse.web.irs.gov/collection/ccpcoll/default.aspx
ICS User Guide :http://icsweb.web.irs.gov/Docs/HTML/user_guide.htm
MY SBSE web: http://mysbse.web.irs.gov/default.aspx
Mailing of computer paragraph (CP) 522, "Review Financial Condition" has been suspended.
Taxpayers whose cases are monitored in Centralized Case Processing, either in status 60 or manually, may also be contacted to obtain updated financial information, but not by use of CP 522
Before entering into installment agreements, schedule changes in monthly payment amounts based on anticipated changes in taxpayers’ ability to pay. (See IRM 184.108.40.206.4).
Notice status balance due accounts less than the amount specified in IRM 220.127.116.11.4.1 may be input to installment agreement status for indeterminate periods of time provided:
agreements do not extend past the CSED, and
taxpayers can make monthly payments of at least ≡ ≡ . (This minimum does not apply to guaranteed agreements — see IRM 18.104.22.168(1)(f)(note)
The agreements discussed in IRM 22.214.171.124 (1) may be taken if:
The liability includes the total amount outstanding, including accruals and currently not collectible accounts;
Equal monthly installments are required for IDRS monitoring; and
there are no other balances due.
Prepare Form 433–D or Form 2159 (levy source information is not required on these agreements); process per the guidance provided in IRM 126.96.36.199. (See also IRM 188.8.131.52, regarding IDRS monitoring.)
In cases in which the payment would be less than ≡ ≡ ≡ , (except guaranteed installment agreements):
request that the taxpayer adjust Form W–4 (following the procedures outlined in IRM 184.108.40.206.2(18)(a)) so the positive amount shown as being available for payments is instead used to increase current withholding; then,
follow the instructions in IRM 5.16 — Currently Not Collectible.
Reporting Accounts Uncollectible: If, based on analysis of Collection Information Statements taxpayers are unable to make payments, consider reporting accounts uncollectible — see IRM 5.16. Provide taxpayers with the address at the Campus where the taxpayer files returns (for mailing voluntary payments). Taxpayers who are unable to make payments generally should not be granted installment agreements.
If taxpayers are able to make payments, but unable to fully pay all balance due accounts, then Partial Payment Installment Agreements may be considered (see IRM 220.127.116.11).
Related entities can be included in one installment agreement. The agreement locator number will auto-populate on ICS to XX63, if there are no other conditions. The ALN ensures proper systemic monitoring of these agreements. For this type of IA , ensure the taxpayer entities are in filing and payment compliance (IRM 18.104.22.168.1) prior to requesting the pending IA indicator (IRM 22.214.171.124(5)). When the pending IA indicator is present (TC971AC043) on the entity and one of the taxpayers is not in compliance at the time the IA is ready to be granted, a recommendation for rejection can be given to the independent administrative reviewer regarding only the person or entity that is not in compliance, and the taxpayer that is in compliance may be granted an installment agreement (if appropriate). The following types of taxes may be combined in one installment agreement:
Taxes for two or more Form 1120S corporations if they share the same sole officer.
A sole proprietorship’s taxes (on the sole prop.’s tax ID number) and the individual income taxes of the sole owner of the sole proprietorship.
Taxes for married couples, even if the taxes are owed individually.
When a request for an IA involves an SSN and EIN (Sole Proprietor) or two SSN's, some years filed joint and some single, combine the aggregate unpaid balance of assessment (CC SUMRY) of all modules. Determine if the taxpayer meets the requirements to qualify for an IA. An IMF account and related BMF account must be included in one IA.
Select the correct IA type based on the combined aggregate unpaid balance of assessments (SUMRY) of all the modules on the related entities. The correct IA type is based on the dollar threshold and type of tax governed by the IA type (Streamlined, IBTF-Express, IBTF-IA).
For installment agreements on multiple entities:
Ensure the cross referenced identification number is entered when completing the IA on ICS by answering “Yes” to the question “Are there other TINs to be included with this installment agreement” to ensure proper input. Campuses will input agreements on the entity with the earliest CSED first.
Both agreements will cross- reference the related EIN or SSN using ALN (XX63). ALN (XX63) will be systemically included on the IA form by ICS (This ensures the accounts appear on the Installment Agreement Account Listings in the correct category.)
The primary taxpayer identification number (TIN) will dictate the Campus to which the agreement will be routed for input. Primary SB/SE TINs will be routed to SB/SE Campuses. Primary W&I TINs will be routed to W&I Campuses for monitoring.
The Campus that inputs the agreement will ensure that ALN XX63 is input on both agreements and the secondary TINs tax modules are input to IDRS status 63 and monitored at the same Campus.
Since the secondary agreement is monitored wherever the primary agreement is set up, this will sometimes result in SB/SE Campuses monitoring W&I cases and W&I Campuses monitoring SB/SE cases.
If an IMF account is included with an in-business BMF account, it must be input in accordance with the procedures provided in IRM 5.14.7, regardless of which TIN has the earliest CSED. The primary TIN for these agreements is the business entity.
These types of I/As , with an ALN of "xx63" cannot be systemically uploaded. ICS will block the input. Process this type of agreement by e-mailing the F433-D to the appropriate CCP mailbox (see below) or mail it on a Form 3210 to CCP at Mail Stop 5-E04.114.
Area Offices 21, 22, 23, 24, and 35 use *SBSE CCS GCP EAST1
Area Office 25 use *SBSE CCS GCP WEST2
Area Offices 26, 27 use *SBSE CCS GCP WEST1
For certain liabilities assessed in the name and EIN of an LLC, different single member owners (SMOs) may be liable for separate tax periods assessed in the same name and EIN. See IRM 5.1.21 , Collecting from Limited Liability Companies. If multiple SMOs are liable for different tax periods assessed in the same name and EIN separate installment agreements would be required for each taxpayer and should be established using the Manually Monitored procedures in IRM 126.96.36.199 .
Ensure a TC130 is input for the appropriate Social Security Number(s).
In situations in which one joint taxpayer has requested relief from joint and several liability under IRC section 6015, if the nonrequesting spouse requests an installment agreement, and there is an unreversed TC 971 AC 065 on any balance due module or a MFT 31 has been established, then:
Follow normal procedures to determine if the taxpayer qualifies for an installment agreement; and include all modules (even the modules with the unreversed TC 971 AC 065) in calculating if the proposed payment amount would full pay the liability before the Collection Statute Expiration Date (CSED). See IRM 188.8.131.52.
If the taxpayer qualifies for an installment agreement, make sure all balance due accounts are included, including those with TC 971 AC 065, and establish the installment agreement using Manually Monitored procedures in IRM 184.108.40.206.
If the spouse filing a claim requests an installment agreement and there is an unreversed TC 971 AC 065 on any balance due module, then:
Follow normal procedures to determine if the taxpayer qualifies for an installment agreement and, include all modules (even the modules with the unreversed TC 971 AC 065) in calculating if the agreement would fully pay the liability before the CSED.
If the taxpayer qualifies for an installment agreement include all modules except those with an unreversed TC 971 AC 065 in the agreement itself.
Establish the agreement using Manually Monitored procedures in IRM 220.127.116.11.
If after such agreements are in effect claims filed under section 6015 are denied and the requesting spouse requests addition of the balance due account(s) to installment agreements, request this on Form 4844.
Note on Form 4844 that the agreement for the case may now be monitored by IDRS if no other conditions exist that are mentioned in IRM 18.104.22.168(3).
To input pending installment agreement codes (TC 971 AC 043) or installment agreement codes (TC 971 AC 063), when an unreversed TC 971 AC 065 already exists on a tax module:
reverse the TC 971 AC 065 using TC 972 AC 065;
input TC 971 AC 043 or AC 063; and
re-input TC 971 AC 065 (after the pending or installment agreement code is on the tax module)
Taxpayers may withdraw installment agreement requests either verbally or in writing.
Requests to withdraw an installment agreement request are only applicable to pending installment agreements, and typically requested when another case closing action is determined to be the appropriate case resolution (Full payment, OIC, CNC, etc.)
In the case of a joint assessment, if the withdrawal is only requested by one spouse, the revenue officer should determine the intent of the other spouse if other than a full pay resolution. If the other spouse wishes to continue with the IA request, the accounts should be mirrored so that separate collectibility determinations can be made.
Exhibit 5.14.4-1 provides the format for withdrawal of installment agreement requests. This format must be used regardless of whether requests for withdrawal are verbal or written.
Verbal requests are effective five (5) calendar days from the day they are received unless a written confirmation of a verbal request is received within the five (5) day period. Taxpayers should be advised that by withdrawing their installment agreement request, appeal rights with respect to that pending installment agreement are extinguished, however, taxpayers can propose a new installment agreement at any time.
Include the reason for the withdrawal request in the appropriate part of the form.
If, after a verbal request for withdrawal, written confirmation is not received, document the case file as to how the request for withdrawal occurred.
Requests for Installment agreements (pending IAs) are considered withdrawn (i.e., withdrawals are effective):
upon receipt of written requests for withdrawal, or
five (5) calendar days after a verbal request for withdrawal.
Withdrawals should not be solicited by contact employees, but questions may be asked to clarify misunderstanding of taxpayers’ statements.
Request input of TC 972 AC 043 (if a TC 971 AC 043 was previously input) on the effective date of the withdrawal. If the case has already been input into installment agreement status, then:
request input of TC 971 AC 163 instead, and
ensure accounts are removed from status 60 and the appropriate collection status is input.
If the installment agreement request was a joint request on a jointly filed return, both taxpayers must sign one request or separate requests for withdrawal for the request to be honored.
No independent review is required in the case of withdrawals. (See IRM 22.214.171.124(17))
For background information on RBAs see IRM 126.96.36.199.3 Restitution Based Assessments.
Revenue Officers (RO) may receive an Other Investigation (OI) from an Advisory Probation Liaison (APL) or a balance due module assignment to conduct a field investigation on a RBA.
Civil assessments with associated RBAs may be received in any Collection work stream (Field, Campus, Automated Collection System) but may only be worked by revenue officers.
IAs for RBAs can only be considered if the proposed IA will result in the full payment of the RBA within the terms of the IA and by the Collection Statute Expiration Date (CSED). Any open civil assessment should be included in the IA, even if the payment agreement won’t result in full payment of those civil assessments. CCP will determine if the IA is a Partial Payment Installment Agreement (PPIA) once the RBAs are paid in full.
IAs that include RBAs should only be established by ROs. If there is an open Conditions of Probation case, the RO should coordinate the establishment of the IA with the APL.
In the event the taxpayer’s ability to pay will not result in the full payment of the RBA, Manually Monitored Installment Agreements (MMIAs) for civil assessments (including PPIAs) can be established exclusive of RBA assessments (that is, the RBA is not included as part of the IA) in cases where the taxpayer’s income/expense analysis shows an ability to pay above the allowable expenses (which will include the court ordered restitution payment). The RBA modules should be reported as Currently Not Collectible using closing code 32.
Assessment - RBA assessments will appear as a MFT 31 with a Transaction Code (TC) 290 and/or a TC 298. The module will contain a TC 971 with an Action Code (AC) 102 and a TC 971 with AC 180 - 189. Examination will issue Notice and Demand, Letter 4885
Assignment - RBA modules will generally not be issued systemically to the Field. Examination will notify Advisory when an assessment has been made. As part of monitoring Conditions of Probation (COP) cases, APLs will issue an Other Investigation (OI) to the Field Area to request a field investigation when there are assessed liabilities including RBAs. When the Field Area group receives an OI for an RBA, the group will accelerate the case, including the related modules, to status 26 by requesting STAUP 2200. Once assigned, the Field will Close the Advisory OI and work the balance due module(s) and related modules, if any.
Pending IA status - IA proposals for RBAs that do not provide for the full payment of the RBAs by the CSED cannot be considered as a pending IA for the RBA modules. If there are associated civil assessments for which the IA proposal can be considered, exclusive of the RBA, those modules should have a TC 971 AC 043 input if pending IA requirements are met and the IA proposal cannot be approved immediately.
Computing Payment Amount - Standard financial analysis will be conducted to determine the appropriate monthly payment amount. Taxpayers will continue to make any court ordered restitution payments directly to the courts, and compliance with the court ordered payments will be listed as an additional condition of the IA. This payment will be considered an allowable expense when determining the taxpayers ability to make monthly payments.
Rejection Issues - The ICS history should clearly indicate the basis for the rejection and clearly identify cases that are rejected based on the fact that the proposed payment as determined by financial analysis will not satisfy the RBA by the CSED. Rejection of an IA that includes a RBA requires concurrence from the Independent Administrative Reviewer.
If accepted, IAs that include RBAs require managerial approval and will be sent to CCP as a MMIA.
Posting of Payments - Payments on IAs that include both RBAs and civil assessments should be posted to the RBAs until fully paid and then in the best interest of the government for the civil assessments. Payments on MMIAs that exclude RBAs will be posted to the civil assessments in the best interest of the government.
The APL will be familiar with the court order and COP. The APL will be able to advise the RO regarding appropriate actions to take and will facilitate coordination with the DOJ Financial Litigation Units when necessary. RBA cases will not be worked by Campus Collection operations. APLs receiving contacts from Field or Campus Collection employees about RBA modules or related assessments should issue an OI to the appropriate Field Area group for investigation if not already assigned.
Payments received by Field Collection employees will be posted using established designated payment codes (DPC). Payments received as a result of administrative collection action may be applied in the government’s best interest. Court ordered restitution payments made to the clerk of court will continue to be sent by the court to Kansas City Submission Processing where they will be posted using DPC 26. SB/SE Campus Compliance Services will cross reference any balance due payments to ensure the full amount of the restitution is only collected once and is not overpaid.