- 8.22.6 Cases Requiring Special Handling
- 126.96.36.199 Overview
- 188.8.131.52 Rapid Response Appeals Process (RRAP)
- 184.108.40.206.1 RRAP Procedures
- 220.127.116.11 Exceptions to IRC 6330 Pre-Levy Notice Requirements
- 18.104.22.168.1 Jeopardy Levy
- 22.214.171.124.2 State Income Tax Levy Program (SITLP)
- 126.96.36.199.3 Disqualified Employment Tax Levy (DETL)
- 188.8.131.52.4 Levy on a Federal contractor (FEDCON)
- 184.108.40.206 International Cases (IC)
- 220.127.116.11 Partnership Liability
- 18.104.22.168 Limited Liability Companies (LLCs)
- 22.214.171.124 Disaster Relief
- 126.96.36.199 Bankruptcy
- 188.8.131.52 Cases Controlled by Department of Justice (DOJ)
- 184.108.40.206.1 Restitution-Based Assessments (RBA)
- 220.127.116.11 Criminal Investigation (CI) Indicators
- 18.104.22.168 Decedent
- 22.214.171.124 Combat Zone (CZ) Indicators
- 126.96.36.199 Military Members and Military Spouse Deferments
Part 8. Appeals
Chapter 22. Collection Due Process
Section 6. Cases Requiring Special Handling
August 09, 2017
(1) This transmits revised IRM 8.22.6, Collection Due Process, Cases Requiring Special Handling.
(1) The material changes in this revision are as follows:
|IRM||Title and Brief Description|
|188.8.131.52.1, Jeopardy Levy||Revised (3) to clarify when a taxpayer is entitled to an IRC 7429 review.|
|184.108.40.206, Cases Controlled by Department of Justice||Added reference to new IRM 220.127.116.11.9, Offers with Department of Justice (DOJ) Referred Tax Periods.|
|18.104.22.168.1, Restitution-Based Assessments (RBA)||New subsection with a brief overview and references to IRM 22.214.171.124.7, Restitution Debt and IRM 126.96.36.199.3, Restitution-Based Assessments.|
|188.8.131.52, Criminal Investigation (CI) Indicators||Added (2) for a 120 day follow-up for suspended CI cases.|
|184.108.40.206, Decedent||Added (5) for situations involving an OIC on an estate and assets(s) listed on the estate tax return.|
|Throughout||Revised to: |
Anita M. Hill,
Director, Case and Operations Support
This section addresses specialty issues in the CDP program.
Not every specialty issue is discussed in this section. Instructions for some cases and issues fit better in other sections as listed in the table below.
Specialty Issue IRM Currently not collectible IRM 220.127.116.11 Earned income tax credits IRM 18.104.22.168 Innocent spouse IRM 22.214.171.124 Interest abatement IRM 126.96.36.199 Math errors IRM 188.8.131.52 Offers in compromise IRM 184.108.40.206 Penalties IRM 220.127.116.11 through IRM 18.104.22.168 Qualified offers IRM 22.214.171.124 Son of Boss IRM 126.96.36.199 Tax Equity and Fiscal Responsibility Act IRM 188.8.131.52 Trust Fund Recovery Penalties IRM 184.108.40.206
RRAP delivers priority CDP hearings for cases meeting ALL of the following criteria:
In-business taxpayer owing employment taxes
Taxpayer is not making Federal Tax Deposits (FTD) in the current quarter
Unpaid tax due including accruals is $10,000 or more
Receipt of a timely request for an IRC 6330 hearing or a combination IRC 6330 and IRC 6320 hearing
No existing tax periods for which levy action may be taken, such as those subject to an equivalent hearing, those for which an IRC 6330 hearing has already been held, or the one year period to request an equivalent hearing has expired. If levy action can be taken for another tax period, the IRC 6330 hearing does not qualify for RRAP
Cases excluded from RRAP include:
Equivalent hearings (EH)
Request solely for an IRC 6320 hearing
Disqualified Employment Tax Levy (DETL)
Not forwarded to Appeals within 45 calendar days of Collection's receipt of the taxpayer's request for a CDP hearing
Case not submitted via encrypted e-mail
To be considered under RRAP, a case must be identified as such by Collection prior to being forwarded to Appeals using the RRAP procedures below.
After approval by the revenue officer's group manager, the digitized case documents listed below must be forwarded to the appropriate Appeals RRAP Technical Coordinator via encrypted e-mail with a courtesy copy to the appropriate RRAP Account and Processing Support (APS) Coordinator within 45 days of the date Collection received the taxpayer's written request for a CDP.
Collection sends RRAP cases via encrypted e-mail to the Appeals RRAP Technical Coordinators and the RRAP APS Coordinators as follows:
SBSE Areas send RRAP cases to Appeals...
Gulf Area states of Alabama, Georgia, Louisiana, Mississippi and Tennessee
Midwest Area state of Indiana
RRAP Technical Coordinator and RRAP APS Coordinator - EAST
Gulf Area states of Arkansas, Oklahoma and Texas
Midwest Area states of Illinois, Iowa, Kansas, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota, South Dakota and Wisconsin
RRAP Technical Coordinator and RRAP APS Coordinator - WEST
RRAP Technical Coordinator contact information is found on the Appeals Case Routing page via the Case Routing Address and Instructions hyperlink.
The e-mail subject line should contain "CDP IBTF RRAP Case - XXXX" where XXXX reflects the case name control.
The file must include the following digitized documents:
Form 12153, Request for a Collection Due Process or Equivalent Hearing, or substitute written request
Form 14461, Transmittal of CDP/Equivalent Hearing Request with a note indicating if financial information is available
Copy of the CDP Notice, Letter 1058, Notice of Intent to Levy and Notice of Your Right to a Hearing, and if the request is for a hearing under both IRC 6320 and IRC 6330, a copy of Letter 3172, Notice of Federal Tax Lien Filing and your Rights to a Hearing Under IRC 6320
Copy of the envelope
Form 433-B or other financial documentation if available
Additional documentation/correspondence sent with the Form 12153
Any additional documentation/information in the case file pertinent to the issue(s) raised by the taxpayer
The Appeals Team Manager (ATM) assigns the case to a hearing officer within 5 business days of being notified the work unit is established on Appeals Centralized Database System (ACDS).
RRAP cases are subject to the initial review, control and documentation requirements in IRM 8.22.5, Receipt, Control and Pre-Conference Considerations. Also, the hearing officer confirms:
Case meets RRAP criteria
Loc 7 field = RRAP
ACDS feature code = PY
If a case does not meet RRAP criteria, take the following steps:
Step Action 1
Remove "RRAP" from the loc 7 field
Remove ACDS feature code "PY"
2 Send an encrypted e-mail to the revenue officer explaining why the case does not meet RRAP criteria 3 Complete an Appeals Officer Closing Code 30/40 Transfer Form 4 Submit the case to the ATM for forwarding to the appropriate Appeals office to be worked through normal CDP procedures
After completing your initial case review:
Contact the taxpayer with a Substantive Contact Letter or telephone within 10 business days of assignment
Generally, a hearing is held within 14 calendar days of the date of the SCL or telephone call. The hearing may be delayed if the facts warrant it
Follow IRM 220.127.116.11.2, No Response Cases, if the taxpayer or representative does not respond to your offer of an Appeals hearing
When closing the RRAP case:
Prepare a Notice of Determination within 14 calendar days of either the date the hearing was held or the last day for the taxpayer to reply to the Letter 4000, Last Chance Letter, unless the taxpayer signed a Form 12257, Summary Notice of Determination, or Form 12256, Withdrawal
If either a Form 12257 or Form 12256 is secured, prepare the closing documents and forward the case to the ATM within 7 calendar days of the receipt
Indicate "RRAP case" in the Special Features section of the Form 5402, Appeals Transmittal and Case Memo
Prepare a fax cover sheet for APS to use in sending information to the revenue officer when the case is closed, and
Forward the case to the ATM for approval
IRC 6330(f) provides 4 exceptions to the pre-levy notice requirements in IRC 6330:
State Income Tax Levy Program (SITLP)
Disqualified Employment Tax Levy (DETL)
Levy on a Federal Contractor (FEDCON)
When the IRS levies prior to issuing a CDP notice in these circumstances, the taxpayer is given the opportunity for a CDP hearing via a post-levy CDP notice issued within a reasonable period of time after the levy. The subsections below discuss each of the exceptions.
If collection is believed to be in jeopardy, a jeopardy levy may be issued before or after the taxpayer has been given a CDP notice. The levy may or may not involve the collection of a jeopardy assessment. After a jeopardy levy, a taxpayer will be issued a CDP notice and Letter 2439, Notice of Jeopardy Levy and Right of Appeal. Letter 2439 informs the taxpayer of the right to an IRC 7429 review. See IRM 8.24.2, Jeopardy Levy Appeals.
If your CDP involves a jeopardy levy, add feature code 'JL' to ACDS.
A taxpayer is entitled to an IRC 7429 review if the jeopardy levy is made fewer than 30 days after the IRS gives the taxpayer the notice described under IRC 6331(a). A jeopardy levy made outside the 30-day time frame under IRC 6331(a) is not entitled to an IRC 7429 review. See Chief Counsel Advice 200242040.
If the taxpayer requests only a CDP hearing, ask if the taxpayer wants an IRC 7429 review as well. The opportunity to request a IRC 7429 review does not preclude the taxpayer from disputing liability in the CDP hearing because liability is not at issue in IRC 7429 review.
To qualify for an IRC 7429 review:
The taxpayer must file a written protest with the Area Director within 30 days of the date Letter 2439, Notice of Jeopardy Levy and Right of Appeal, was given to the taxpayer or within 30 days of the date Letter 2439 was required to be given to the taxpayer under IRC 7429(a)(1)(B), and
Written protest was sent to the address listed on the Letter 2439
If the taxpayer meaningfully participates in an IRC 7429 administrative or judicial review in which a decision is made about the reasonableness of the jeopardy determination or the appropriateness of the amount of the jeopardy assessment, the taxpayer is precluded from raising those issues in the CDP hearing. See IRM 18.104.22.168.1.
If the taxpayer requests an IRC 7429 review AND a CDP hearing, suspend the CDP hearing until the IRC 7429 administrative and judicial review concludes.
If the jeopardy levy is found to be unreasonable in the IRC 7429 review, the jeopardy levy will be released (IRC 7429(b)(4)) or the collected tax will be returned to the taxpayer.
Generally, collection is suspended during a pending CDP hearing. Jeopardy levied property should not be sold until Appeals has made its final determination and the 90 day period during which the taxpayer may appeal a final determination has expired. IRC 6330(e)(1).
If the taxpayer requests that jeopardy levied property be sold, the property must be sold within 60 days of the request to sell unless it is determined (and the taxpayer is notified within the 60 day period) that sale of the property is not in the government’s best interest per IRC 6335(f). Sale of a taxpayer’s property pursuant to such a request is not suspended by the CDP hearing. If a taxpayer makes a request that meets the requirements of IRC 6335(f):
Offer the taxpayer the option to withdraw the CDP so the case can be returned to Collection to proceed with the sale as requested.
If the taxpayer declines to withdraw, issue the taxpayer a letter within 60 days of the request to sell, stating that sale of the property is not in the best interests of the United States.
A taxpayer may also appeal the jeopardy levy under the Collection Appeals Program (CAP) in limited circumstances.
If the taxpayer petitions the Tax Court from the notice of deficiency after a jeopardy/termination assessment and also requests a CDP hearing after a jeopardy levy is made to collect the jeopardy/termination assessment, suspend the CDP hearing until the Tax Court decision becomes final.
A Tax Court decision does not become final until the time period for seeking review by a federal court of appeals has expired or all appellate review has been completed. See IRC 7481. In the event a taxpayer seeks court of appeals review of the Tax Court deficiency decision, there may be circumstances in which Appeals may resume the CDP hearing and issue a notice of determination. Consult with Area Counsel.
The State Income Tax Levy Program (SITLP) is an automated levy program that attaches state income tax refunds.
If the levy is the first levy made with respect to a particular tax and tax period and no CDP 6330 notice was previously issued, a post levy CDP notice is issued, giving the taxpayer an opportunity for a CDP hearing.
With a Disqualified Employment Tax Levy (DETL), Collection may choose to levy and then issue a post-levy CDP notice. A tax period may be collected by a DETL if the following requirements are met:
There is an employment tax liability for any tax period
The taxpayer or its predecessor previously requested a CDP levy hearing relating to employment taxes
The prior CDP hearing request involved unpaid employment taxes that arose in the two-year period before the period for which the levy is served
Collection processes post-levy CDP hearing requests to Appeals in the same manner as pre-levy CDP hearing requests.
A DETL levy may be served during a timely requested pre- or post-levy CDP hearing or judicial review of such hearing to collect employment tax liabilities (DETL tax periods) subject to the hearing. The revenue officer checks IDRS for actions that may prohibit levy action, i.e., TC 480 or TC 971 AC 043. Finding none, the Collection Group Manager contacts the hearing officer's ATM by secure e-mail to advise levy action is planned and asks whether Appeals has information that may affect the decision to levy. The ATM responds within 5 days with yes or no response:
Yes, Appeals has information that levy would create an economic hardship
Yes, Appeals has information that would prohibit levy action absent a determination that collection of the tax is in jeopardy
No, Appeals has no information that would prohibit levy action
If a levy is served to collect the liability for DETL periods:
The taxpayer has CAP rights regarding the DETL
The Appeals hearing officer could determine in the CDP hearing that the tax period levied is not a DETL period and direct Collection to release the levy. See the table at (6) below
In a DETL post-levy CDP hearing, you must verify whether the levied periods met DETL requirements. See the tables below:
To Verify... Look at... There is an employment tax liability for any tax period Confirm the levy was for employment taxes, which include:
Form 940, Employer's Annual Federal Unemployment (FUTA) Tax Return, (MFT 10)
Form 941, Employer's QUARTERLY Federal Tax Return, (MFT 01)
Form 943, Employer's ANNUAL Tax Return for Agricultural Employees, (MFT 11)
Form 944, Employer's Annual Federal Tax Return, (MFT 14)
Form 945, Annual Return of Withheld Federal Income Tax, (MFT 16)
Form CT-1, Employer’s Annual Railroad Retirement Tax Return, (MFT 09)
To Verify... Look at... The levy is for taxes owed by a taxpayer or a predecessor who previously requested a CDP levy hearing. A "prior" request refers to a timely, processable CDP levy hearing request and includes:
A "prior" request does not include:
Timely request withdrawn in Collection or Appeals.
Post-levy request for a CDP hearing made in response to a post-levy CDP notice Letter 1058-D, Post Levy Collection Due Process (CDP) Notice, such as for a state refund or jeopardy levy.
An equivalent hearing levy request.
An untimely CDP levy hearing request that was not treated as a request for an equivalent hearing.
To identify a prior timely CDP levy hearing request, look at:
ACDS case summary card for prior DPLV and DPL2 hearing.
IDRS command code TXMODA - Look for TC 971 AC 630, which shows the taxpayer made a CDP levy hearing request for that module.
To verify whether a business is a predecessor business for the purpose of IRC 6330(h), see IRM 22.214.171.124.3, Predecessor Determination. To Verify... Look at... The prior timely CDP hearing request included at least one unpaid employment tax period that ended during the two-year period before the period to be levied The two-year look-back period is measured from the beginning of the DETL tax period. If the taxpayer requested a CDP levy hearing for employment taxes that arose during the two-year look-back period, the period qualifies for a DETL.
The taxpayer owes for employment taxes for 12/31/2011. A CDP Levy Notice listing this liability was issued and the taxpayer timely requested a CDP levy hearing. The taxpayer pyramids for 6/30/2012. This new liability qualifies for a DETL because the taxpayer requested a prior levy hearing for the 12/31/2011 liability arising during a quarter that ended within the two-year look-back period of the quarter to be levied via DETL (04/01/2012 back two years).
Collection must issue a post-levy CDP notice (Letter 1058-D) within 10 days after issuing the DETL. The notice must be:
If you determine none of the periods qualify for the DETL, take the following actions:
Step Action 1 Notify the revenue officer by encrypted e-mail (with a "cc" to the revenue officer's group manager) to immediately release the levy. Identify the taxpayer in the e-mail with the following information:
Name of taxpayer/TIN
Date of DETL
Date of post-levy DETL CDP notice (Letter 1058-D)
2 Choose the applicable explanation why the period(s) do not qualify for the DETL from the following list:
"Type of tax" is not employment tax
Taxpayer or the taxpayer's predecessor did not request a prior, timely, CDP levy hearing
Prior timely, CDP Levy hearing request did not involve any employment tax period ending within the two-year look-back period
CP 504/Status 58 notice not issued prior to DETL levy
Period on the prior, timely hearing request that ends within the two-year look back period was not listed on a prior pre- or post-levy CDP Levy Notice (Letter 1058/Letter 1058-D)
3 End the e-mail with the following paragraph:
" You must immediately release the Disqualified Employment Tax Levy. If you would like to discuss this, I must invite the taxpayer or the authorized representative to participate in the discussion to avoid prohibited ex parte communication. Appeals will hold a pre-levy CDP hearing on the following period(s) released from the DETL: MFT/tax period(s)."
4 Treat the post-levy CDP Letter 1058-D as a pre-levy CDP Notice and follow established procedures in scheduling a pre-levy conference. 5 If the taxpayer brings to Appeals’ attention that the Service received (or will receive) specific property or funds from the illegal DETL
Ask the taxpayer if he/she wants the levied property or funds returned. If the taxpayer requests return of the wrongfully levied property (and IRC 6343 permits such return), instruct Collection to take the necessary steps to return the levied property or funds in the "Remarks" section of the CDP Form 5402.
Document the taxpayer's decision regarding any levied property or funds in the case activity record.
If you determine some but not all of the periods do not qualify for the DETL, take the following actions:
Step Action 1 Notify the revenue officer by encrypted e-mail (with a "cc" to the revenue officer's group manager) to immediately issue a partial release of the levy, releasing all of the non-DETL periods and then follow Steps 1 - 3 in the table in paragraph (5) above. 2 Treat the post-levy CDP Notice Letter 1058-D as a pre-levy CDP Notice for the period(s) that does not qualify for DETL and follow established procedures in scheduling a conference. 3 If the taxpayer brings to Appeals’ attention that the Service received (or will receive) specific property or funds from the DETL that will exceed the amount due on the actual DETL period(s):
Ask the taxpayer if he/she wants the wrongfully levied property or funds returned. If the taxpayer requests return of the wrongfully levied property (and IRC 6343 permits such return), instruct Collection to take the necessary steps to return any levied property or funds in excess of what's owed on the DETL period(s) in the "Remarks" section of the CDP Form 5402.
Document the taxpayer's decision regarding any levied property or funds in the case activity record.
If the taxpayer's post-levy CDP hearing request lists a tax period not on Letter 1058-D, the period may have been listed on a prior CDP levy notice. Verify this by checking IDRS command code TXMODA for a TC 971 AC 069. If the taxpayer was issued a prior CDP levy notice, the taxpayer may not be entitled to a CDP hearing for that period, but may qualify for an equivalent hearing. Collection is responsible to work with the taxpayer to perfect the hearing request per IRM 126.96.36.199.2.3, Perfection of Hearing Requests, (field), IRM 188.8.131.52.2.2, Perfection of Timely CDP Hearing Requests, (ACS), and IRM 184.108.40.206.3.2, Perfection of Timely Equivalent Hearing Requests, (ACS). Follow the above instructions in IRM 220.127.116.11.4, Premature Referrals, regarding the non-Letter 1058-D period.
At the conclusion of the CDP hearing, the verification of legal and administrative requirements in the ACM/attachment should include your finding as to whether the levy properly preceded the CDP notice.
The Federal Payment Levy Program (FPLP) is an automated levy program implemented with the Department of the Treasury, Financial Management Service (FMS).
For federal payments other than Social Security or Railroad Retirement Board (RRB) benefit payments, FPLP may issue a FEDCON levy to FMS to collect federal tax debts owed by Federal contractors. If the levy is the first levy made with respect to a particular tax and tax period, a post-levy CDP notice is issued, giving the taxpayer an opportunity for a CDP hearing. See IRM 18.104.22.168, Federal Payment Levy Program.
International tax issues arise from overseas and cross-border activities of U.S. businesses and individuals as well as U.S. activities of foreign businesses and individuals. The definition of International issues, including coordinated, non-coordinated, and emerging issues can be found on the Appeals International website located at http://appeals.web.irs.gov/intl/default.htm.
Input Feature Code "IC" (International Case) to ACDS when a CDP has an international tax issue.
International tax issues generally require a referral to the Appeals Team Managers of the International Technical Specialist groups found on the Appeals International web page. See IRM 22.214.171.124.1,Referring a Liability Issue, for instructions on referring the international tax issue to an AO for consideration.
Form 13381, Appeals Technical Guidance/International Referral is:
Used when the international tax issue requires only a telephonic or secure e-mail consultation with International Operations
Not used when a liability WUNO is established under IRM 126.96.36.199.1 , Referring a Liability Issue, and referred to an International AO Team for consideration
Form 13381 resources are found on the International website http://appeals.web.irs.gov/intl/default.htm including:
ACDS Form 13381 desk guide under the RESOURCES tab
A link out to Form 13381 under the REFERRALS tab
Where to send the referral under the REFERRALS tab
Under state law, general partners in partnerships are liable for taxes assessed against the partnership. In United States v. Galletti, 541 U.S. 114 (2004), the Supreme Court held the Service’s assessment against a partnership serves to make the general partner liable for the tax. While the Supreme Court did not address administrative collection, Galletti is consistent with the Service’s long-standing legal position that it can enforce a tax lien and take administrative levy action against a general partner based on the assessment and notice and demand directed to the partnership. See Chief Counsel Notice 2005-003 at http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-ccdm/cc-2005-003.pdf
A partner's individual CDP hearing request:
Affects Collection's ability to collect from that partner's individual assets
Does not affect Collection's ability to collect from the partnership or other individual partners' assets
Collection must identify the liable taxpayer prior to issuing a CDP notice so that the correct entity is notified of their right to a CDP hearing. IRM 5.1.21, Collecting From Limited Liability Companies (LLCs), contains guidance for Collection employees including IRM 188.8.131.52, Identification of Liable Taxpayer, and IRM 184.108.40.206.1, Collection Due Process Notice.
The liable taxpayer is either the:
LLC: When the LLC is the taxpayer, the assessment is made against the LLC and the notice and demand and the CDP notice are issued in the name of the LLC and the LLC has the right to a CDP hearing; or
SMO: When the Single Member Owner (SMO) is the taxpayer, the assessment is made against the SMO and the notice and demand and the CDP notice are issued in the name of the SMO and the SMO has the right to a CDP hearing
Appeals must verify whether Collection properly assessed the correct person or entity and properly issued the notice and demand and the CDP notice to the liable taxpayer as part of the Legal and Administrative analysis. This is done by reviewing:
ICS history to see how the revenue officer documented the basis of their liable taxpayer determination
IDRS transcripts for command code BMFOLE to confirm the liable taxpayer:
When... Look at BMFOLE to see... the liability is employment taxes on wages paid before January 1, 2009
If the LLC elected to be classified as an association taxable as a corporation, the LLC is the taxpayer
If the LLC did not elect to be classified as an association taxable as a corporation, the liable taxpayer is dependent on whether the LLC has one member or more than one member
LLC established on or after January 1, 2009 The LLC indicator denotes whether the LLC had one member or more than one member when it was established:
"S" for a single member
"M" for a multi-member
A blank indicates entity was not identified as an LLC, or it was established prior to January 1, 2009
The liable taxpayer is sometimes identified in TXMOD with Transaction Code (TC) 971 and an Action Code (AC) shown below:
Action Code Explanation 364 LLC is the liable taxpayer for this tax period 365 Single member is the liable taxpayer for this tax period 366 Liable taxpayer changed during this tax period
The table below reflects Part 5 IRM sections containing LLC instructions Collection must follow when deciding how to list the taxpayer's name on the notice of lien or levy and whom to notify of CDP rights:
Action IRM Section Levy - Field IRM 220.127.116.11.2.6 Levy - ACS IRM 18.104.22.168.4 Lien - Field IRM 22.214.171.124.3 Lien - ACS IRM 126.96.36.199 through IRM 188.8.131.52.3
A disregarded SMO LLC is carded-in on ACDS as the case appears on IDRS. The information on ACDS must match IDRS.
If you determine the LLC entity is a disregarded single owner, prepare the ACDS update form and request that APS:
A request for a CDP hearing that lists the SMO's name and the LLC's EIN but not the single owner's TIN is not valid. The taxpayer is required to include an identifying number in the written CDP hearing request. Thus, if a single owner of a disregarded LLC fails to include his/her TIN and lists only the LLC's EIN, then the CDP hearing request is not perfected. If a CDP is referred to Appeals without required TIN information, attempt to obtain it from internal sources - IRM 184.108.40.206.3, Imperfect Hearing Requests. If you cannot locate the TIN from internal sources, return the request as a premature referral.
If the CDP notice was not properly issued to the liable taxpayer, return the request to Collection as a premature referral. Not properly issued includes:
The CDP notice was not issued to the liable taxpayer
The name of the liable taxpayer was not included on the original CDP notice
The CDP notice was not sent to the liable taxpayer's last known address
A review of IDRS is generally all that is required to verify a CDP notice was properly issued to the liable taxpayer. However, it is possible for an LLC to change without notice to the IRS. If the L & A verification confirms the CDP notice was properly issued but the taxpayer claims collection action is directed at a person or entity who is not liable, (e.g. the assessment was made against the wrong person or entity, the notices (including notice and demand) were issued to the wrong person or entity) the taxpayer should be asked to document that claim. This issue can be complex as both State law and Treas. Regs. can factor in. Refer to IRM 5.1.21,, Collecting From Limited Liability Companies (LLCs) and if in doubt, consult with Area Counsel.
Add ACDS feature code "DR" to cases that qualify for disaster relief.
Special tax law provisions may grant additional time to file returns and pay taxes as a means to help taxpayers recover financially from the impact of a disaster, especially when the federal government declares their location to be a major disaster area.
Appeals follows the Disaster Relief Memorandums issued by the Director, Communications, Liaison and Disclosure (CLD), when dealing with taxpayers in a disaster-covered area. Disaster Relief Memorandums are available at: http://www.icce.irs.gov/fema/
Disaster Relief IRM guidance for Appeals is found at:
IRM 220.127.116.11, Technical and Procedural Guidelines, Guidelines for Cases with Special Issues, Disaster Relief Cases, and
IRM 25.16.1, Disaster Assistance and Emergency Relief
If a taxpayer files bankruptcy after filing for a CDP or EH hearing:
Suspend the case by inputting SU/PI and E/BNK to the Case Activity Record (CAR).
Do not issue a Notice of Determination or Decision Letter
Do not request a Form 12256, Withdrawal or Form 12257, Summary Notice of Determination
There are certain actions that should be taken on CDP/EH cases with a bankruptcy proceeding which do not violate the automatic stay. See IRM 18.104.22.168, Appeals Bankruptcy Cases, Collection Due Process Cases, for a discussion of the following:
Verification of the bankruptcy filing
Suspending the CDP proceeding
Monitoring and reactivating a suspended case
Determining if the automatic stay has lifted
Resuming the CDP process
If a Notice of Determination or Decision Letter was issued on an open bankruptcy case, alert Area Counsel as the notice may be void.
11 U.S.C. 362(a)(8) prohibits the commencement or continuation of a Tax Court proceeding concerning:
A corporate debtor's tax liability for a taxable period the bankruptcy court may determine (generally, a taxable period that ends before the plan confirmation date), and
An individual debtor's tax liability for a taxable period ending before the bankruptcy petition date (i.e., pre-petition tax liabilities).
If a taxpayer appeals a CDP determination to the Tax Court while an automatic stay is in effect, the appeal is void and the Tax Court lacks jurisdiction over the appeal.
A prior bankruptcy may constitute a prior opportunity for a hearing on the liability if the same tax periods are later involved in CDP. Consult with Area Counsel to examine the facts of the bankruptcy case and determine whether the taxpayer had an actual opportunity to contest the liability in the bankruptcy. For example:
If a request for 11 U.S.C. 505(a)(1) determination of liability was granted or an objection to the Service’s proof of claim was filed in an individual Chapter 11 or 13 case, or a non-individual Chapter 11 case in which the taxpayer was debtor-in-possession, then liability for the tax is generally precluded from consideration in a later proceeding. However, if there was no bankruptcy court consideration of the liability, Appeals cannot conclude that the taxpayer could have disputed the liability during the court proceeding without considering the facts of the case
A taxpayer cannot invoke a bankruptcy court’s jurisdiction to determine a tax liability in a Chapter 7 bankruptcy in which all assets of the estate were exempt
A bankruptcy court may abstain from considering a tax dispute that can be considered in another forum, such as Tax Court
DOJ has the sole authority to settle or otherwise compromise liabilities in the following situations:
Issue IDRS Indicator: Suit to enforce a federal tax lien TC 520 cc 70 Suit to reduce a claim to judgment TC 520 cc 80 Tax liability reduced to a judgment TC 550 with definer code 04 Tax liability assigned to Criminal Investigation TC 910
Contact the appropriate Collection Technical Services Advisory (see the Collection Advisory Contact List link in the Resources section of the Appeals CDP web page, or Pub 4235, Collection Advisory Group Numbers and Addresses) to verify whether restitution was ordered. If restitution was ordered, the tax period may be under DOJ control. If the liability is subject to a criminal prosecution and the taxpayer has not completed his or her sentence, DOJ may have control over the liability in the absence of a restitution order. Check with Area Counsel.
When you discover tax periods with DOJ controls, determine the status and issues in the suit, and contact Area Counsel for guidance. If Counsel believes continuing the CDP hearing could adversely affect the ongoing litigation, Counsel will ask you to suspend the CDP hearing. Input ’SU/PI’ in the CAR to place the case in ’E/OTH’ status
If Appeals is recommending acceptance of a doubt as to collectability offer with DOJ referred tax periods, DOJ concurrence is required. Ask Area Counsel to share your OIC recommendation with DOJ for their review. See IRM 22.214.171.124.9, Offers with Department of Justice (DOJ) Controlled Tax Periods, for guidance.
The table below provides instructions for DOJ controlled cases:
IF... THEN... Counsel determines conducting the hearing will not adversely affect the ongoing litigation Appeals may proceed with those issues that are not part of the suit (e.g., compliance with all legal and administrative requirements with respect to the lien or proposed levy). Advise the taxpayer of any issue over which Appeals does not have jurisdiction to consider A CDP hearing is held while a suit involving the same liability is pending with DOJ Appeals does not have the jurisdiction to consider any issue that is part of the suit (such as the existence or amount of the tax liability) A case is referred to DOJ for defense or prosecution Only DOJ has the authority to settle the case, including an OIC An OIC or settlement proposal for a DOJ case is submitted to Appeals Share the proposal with DOJ for its consideration DOJ has referred a judgment to IRS for collection DOJ approval is not required for Appeals to enter into an IA that provides for full payment of the liability
If a taxpayer has not raised any issues over which Appeals has jurisdiction:
Step Action 1 Schedule a conference and explain why Appeals is not able to consider the issues raised 2 Request a withdrawal if the taxpayer has no other issues that Appeals may consider. See IRM 126.96.36.199.5, CDP Withdrawals 3 If the taxpayer does not withdraw, verify compliance with all legal and administrative requirements and issue the Notice of Determination/ Decision Letter, noting the issues raised and whether Appeals had jurisdiction to consider those issues
In a criminal tax case, the court may require a defendant to pay the losses incurred by the Government. IRC 6201(a)(4)provides that the Secretary shall assess and collect the amount of restitution under an order pursuant to section 3556 of title 18, United States Code, for failure to pay any tax imposed under this title in the same manner as if such amount were tax. RBAs may also be referred to as criminal restitution assessments. DOJ has sole authority over a restitution judgment. See IRM 188.8.131.52.7,Restitution Debt, for the differences between a restitution judgment and a restitution-based assessment.
The IRS may take administrative collection actions under the Internal Revenue Code to collect a restitution-based assessment. A taxpayer may not challenge the amount of the restitution-based assessment but may seek review of collection actions under CDP. See IRM 184.108.40.206.3, Restitution-Based Assessments.
IDRS may confirm an IRS Criminal Investigation Division (CI) investigation. See the table below for CI indicators in IDRS:
CI Indicator Indicates Action Required TC 914 (-Z) an active criminal investigation Contact the special agent assigned the investigation of the CDP request. They will advise whether you may proceed with the CDP hearing or suspend it by placing it in 'E/OTH' status pending the outcome of the criminal investigation. TC 916 (Z-) a refund scheme on some modules Contact the Questionable Refund Detection Team (QRDT) located in the campus that input the TC 916 (identifiable by the first two digits of the Document Locator Number (DLN) associated with the TC 916). Inform them of the CDP hearing. They will advise whether you may proceed with the CDP hearing or suspend it by placing it in 'E/OTH' status pending the outcome of the criminal investigation. TC 918 (Z-) a refund scheme freeze in all modules. Contact the QRDT located in the campus that input the TC 918 (identifiable by the first two digits of the DLN associated with the TC 918). Inform them of the CDP hearing request. They will advise whether you may proceed with the CDP hearing or suspend the case by placing it in 'E/OTH' status pending the outcome of the criminal investigation.
A 120 day follow-up is appropriate on CI cases unless the special agent states a different time frame for follow up or completion.
A CDP hearing involves a decedent when:
A taxpayer's estate requests a hearing, or
A taxpayer dies after requesting a CDP hearing
If a taxpayer dies after requesting a CDP hearing, the request is still valid. However, any Form 2848, Power of Attorney, terminates by operation of law. Obtain a copy of the executor's or administrator's appointment to act on behalf of the estate and ask if they wish to continue the CDP hearing. Then consult the table below:
IF... THEN... The executor or administrator does not wish to continue with the hearing Request a Form 12256 and, if received, close the case. The executor or administrator wishes to continue with the hearing
Schedule a conference to consider non-collection issues. For instance, the executor or administrator may raise liability or a spousal defense issue.
Advise that Appeals cannot consider a collection proposals from probate assets if the assets are under the control of a probate court but can consider proposals from non-probate assets.
At the conclusion of the hearing, issue a Notice of Determination/ Decision noting the issues raised, whether Appeals had jurisdiction to consider those issues and what you decided.
The liability is satisfied via the proof of claim filed with the probate court during the hearing and no other issues were raised Request a Form 12256 or issue a Notice of Determination/Decision Letter.
The IRS may not levy on probate assets without permission of the probate court. If Appeals is unable to reach an alternative to collection in such a case, the determination/decision may state that levy is sustained but not against assets in the custody of the court, absent permission from the court.
If there is no requirement for probate, the personal representative or any successor in interest (e.g., spouse, trustee, surviving joint tenant, etc.) MAY be authorized to sign on behalf of the estate. Confirm there is no requirement for probate and that either the successor in interest is appointed personal representative under the decedent's will or the successor in interest otherwise qualifies. If the successor in interest is not willing to sign the withdrawal or continue the CDP hearing, issue the Notice of Determination/Decision Letter based on the available information.
When calculating an estate’s Reasonable Collection Potential (RCP) in an offer in compromise, Collection may need to value an asset that was previously listed on the estate tax return. If the taxpayer disputes Collection’s valuation, you will need to determine the value of the asset. A starting point for your analysis should be the value listed on the estate tax return, the value determined by Collection, or the value determined by the Tax Court in an estate tax deficiency case following the IRS’s examination of the return. For estate tax purposes, assets are valued as of the date of death. In calculating the RCP, Collection should have determined whether the value of the asset has increased, remained the same, or decreased since the valuation for estate tax purposes. If the taxpayer has provided additional or new information in Appeals, consider whether issuing an Appeals Referral Investigation (ARI) is necessary to determine an asset value. Refer to IRM 220.127.116.11 and its subsections for guidance on ARIs. Explain your determination of the asset’s value in the Notice of Determination.
Contact local Area Counsel with any questions concerning local law on probate.
Combat Zone (CZ) accounts are identified by a -C freeze, which indicates a taxpayer is or was serving in a designated combat zone area.
When working an account with a –C freeze, additional research is required to determine the taxpayer's CZ status. Research CC IMFOLE for the Combat indicator on Line 11. See the table below:
If ... Then... Combat indicator is 1 the taxpayer is serving in a combat zone. Contact the taxpayer or his/her representative and ask if he/she wants to proceed with the CDP hearing or postpone it per IRC 7508. If the taxpayer elects to postpone or does not respond, suspend the case in ACDS as 'E/OTH'. Follow-up to determine when collection is no longer suspended and the CDP hearing can proceed. Combat indicator is 2 the taxpayer is no longer a combat zone participant. Proceed with the hearing.
Members of the United States armed forces and their spouses may be eligible for certain deferments under:
The Servicemembers Civil Relief Act
The Military Spouses Residency Relief Act
Review the following IRM sections for information and eligibility:
IRM 18.104.22.168, Collecting Process, Field Collection Procedures, Military Deferments
IRM 22.214.171.124.9, Collecting Process, Liability Collection, Military Deferments, (ACS)
IRM 126.96.36.199, Penalty and Interest, Abatement and Suspension of Interest, Military Deferments
IRM 188.8.131.52.7, Customer Account Services, International, Military Spouses Residency Relief Act