- 1.4.40 SB/SE Field and Office Examination Group Manager
- 18.104.22.168 Introduction
- 22.214.171.124.1 Operating Divisions
- 126.96.36.199 SB/SE Operating Units
- 188.8.131.52 Role
- 184.108.40.206.1 Role of a Group Manager
- 220.127.116.11.2 Balanced Measures
- 18.104.22.168.3 Accomplishments
- 22.214.171.124.4 Managing Statistics
- 126.96.36.199.5 Annual Examination Goals
- 188.8.131.52.6 Definition of Terms
- 184.108.40.206.7 Performance Feedback
- 220.127.116.11.8 Dealing with Taxpayers and External Customers
- 18.104.22.168.8.1 Taxpayer Concerns or Complaints
- 22.214.171.124.8.2 Management Responsibility Regarding Right of Consultation
- 126.96.36.199.8.3 Procrastinating Taxpayers and Representatives
- 188.8.131.52.8.4 Bypass of a Representative
- 184.108.40.206.9 Time Accounting Responsibilities
- 220.127.116.11 Workload Planning
- 18.104.22.168.1 Importance of Accuracy of Case Databases
- 22.214.171.124.1.1 Access to Inventory Control Systems
- 126.96.36.199.1.1.1 Integrated Data Retrieval System (IDRS)
- 188.8.131.52.1.1.2 Access to Group Inventory and Case Controls
- 184.108.40.206.1.2 Taxpayer Browsing Protection Act/UNAX
- 220.127.116.11.1.3 Control Systems for Cases
- 18.104.22.168.2 Case Control Procedures
- 22.214.171.124.2.1 Requisition of Returns
- 126.96.36.199.2.2 Nonfiler Case Procedures
- 188.8.131.52.2.3 Updating Case Databases
- 184.108.40.206.2.4 Use of AIMS Codes
- 220.127.116.11.2.5 Closing of Returns
- 18.104.22.168.2.6 Shipment of Returns
- 22.214.171.124.3 Statute Controls
- 126.96.36.199.3.1 Statute Control File
- 188.8.131.52.3.2 Generating, Printing and Processing Forms 895
- 184.108.40.206.3.3 Imminent Statute Returns
- 220.127.116.11.3.4 Expired Statutes
- 18.104.22.168.4 Monitoring 30-Day Letters
- 22.214.171.124.5 Inventory Management
- 126.96.36.199.6 Assigning Returns
- 188.8.131.52.6.1 Priority Work
- 184.108.40.206.6.2 Surveying Cases
- 220.127.116.11.6.2.1 Group Manager Risk Analysis
- 18.104.22.168.6.2.2 Survey Before Assignment
- 22.214.171.124.126.96.36.199 Paperless Survey Before Assignment
- 188.8.131.52.184.108.40.206 Paper Survey Before Assignment
- 220.127.116.11.18.104.22.168 Survey Before Assignment - Claims for Refund and Requests for Abatement
- 22.214.171.124.6.2.3 Survey After Assignment Procedures
- 126.96.36.199.6.3 Transferring Office Examination Cases to Field Examination
- 188.8.131.52.6.4 Delinquent Returns and Nonfiler Cases
- 184.108.40.206.6.5 Grade Level of Work for Field Examination Cases
- 220.127.116.11.6.5.1 Guidelines for Determining the Grade Levels of Field Examination Cases
- 18.104.22.168.6.5.2 Characteristics of Field Examination Cases
- 22.214.171.124.126.96.36.199 Part I Chart of Case Grading Factors
- 188.8.131.52.184.108.40.206 Part II - North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) Listing
- 220.127.116.11.18.104.22.168 Part IIIProbable Grade Levels of Cases Based on Type of Industry/Occupation and Size
- 22.214.171.124.126.96.36.199 Part IVList of Upgradable Issues that May Result in an Upgrade for Field Examination Cases
- 188.8.131.52.6.5.3 Procedures for Field Examination Cases
- 184.108.40.206.6.5.4 Case Grading for Special Situations for Field Examination Cases
- 220.127.116.11.6.5.5 Relationship of Guide to Position Management for Field Examination Cases
- 18.104.22.168.6.5.6 Recording Grade of Case on Form 5344, Examination Closing Record for Field Examination Cases
- 22.214.171.124.7 Managing Open Inventories
- 126.96.36.199.8 Collectibility
- 188.8.131.52.9 Case Inactivity
- 184.108.40.206.10 Related Pickup Work
- 220.127.116.11.11 Closing Returns General
- 18.104.22.168.11.1 Advance Payments/Deposits
- 22.214.171.124.11.2 No Change Closing Procedures
- 126.96.36.199.11.3 Agreed Closing Procedures
- 188.8.131.52.11.4 Partially Agreed Closing Procedures
- 184.108.40.206.11.5 Unagreed Closing Procedures
- 220.127.116.11.11.5.1 Unagreed Closing Procedures - RA Group Managers
- 18.104.22.168.11.5.2 Unagreed Closing Procedures - TCO Group Managers
- 22.214.171.124.11.6 Short Statute Cases 180 Days or Less
- 126.96.36.199 Monitoring Reports Overview
- 188.8.131.52.1 AIMS Tables 36
- 184.108.40.206.2 AIMS Table 4.1
- 220.127.116.11.3 Other AIMS Tables
- 18.104.22.168.4 NQRS and EQRS Reports
- 22.214.171.124.5 PCS Reports
- 126.96.36.199.6 ERCS Reports
- 188.8.131.52.7 Reports to be Worked by the Group
- 184.108.40.206 Group Manager Expectations
- 220.127.116.11.1 Performance Management System (PMS)
- 18.104.22.168.2 Federal Managers Financial Integrity Act of 1982 (FMFIA)
- 22.214.171.124.3 Developing Group/Team Expectations
- 126.96.36.199.4 Communicating Expectations to Employees
- 188.8.131.52.5 Monitoring and Follow-up Procedures
- 184.108.40.206 Guiding and Evaluating Employees
- 220.127.116.11.1 Performance Appraisal
- 18.104.22.168.2 Service Policies, Procedures and Guidelines
- 22.214.171.124.3 Appraisals and Documentation
- 126.96.36.199.4 Awards
- 188.8.131.52.4.1 Processing Awards
- 184.108.40.206.5 Employee Performance Files (EPFs)
- 220.127.116.11.6 Group Manager Concurrence Meeting (GMCM) for Revenue Agents
- 18.104.22.168.7 In-Process Case Reviews
- 22.214.171.124.8 Workload Reviews
- 126.96.36.199.8.1 Compare Group Controls with Examiner's Inventory
- 188.8.131.52.8.2 Items to Address During the Workload Review
- 184.108.40.206.8.2.1 Adequacy of Inventory
- 220.127.116.11.8.2.2 Priority Work
- 18.104.22.168.8.2.3 Cases in Process for Extended Periods of Time
- 22.214.171.124.8.2.4 Status 10 Inventory
- 126.96.36.199.8.2.5 In Process Inventory
- 188.8.131.52.8.2.6 Workload Problems and Delays
- 184.108.40.206.8.2.7 Compatibility of Work with Employee's Grade
- 220.127.116.11.8.2.8 Specialist Referrals and Technical Assistance
- 18.104.22.168.8.2.9 Use of Time
- 22.214.171.124.8.2.10 AIMS/ERCS Controls
- 126.96.36.199.9 On-the-Job Visit
- 188.8.131.52.9.1 Planning and Scheduling the Examination
- 184.108.40.206.9.2 Accounting Skills and Tax Knowledge
- 220.127.116.11.9.3 Workpapers and Reports
- 18.104.22.168.9.4 Closing the Examination
- 22.214.171.124.10 Completed Case Review
- 126.96.36.199.10.1 Examination Planning and Scheduling
- 188.8.131.52.10.2 Accounting Skills and Tax Law Knowledge
- 184.108.40.206.10.3 Workpapers and Reports
- 220.127.116.11.10.4 Use of Time
- 18.104.22.168.11 Review of Examination Technical Time Reports (ETTR)
- 22.214.171.124.11.1 ETTR Analysis
- 126.96.36.199.12 On-Going Observation
- 188.8.131.52.13 Feedback from Other Areas
- 184.108.40.206.14 Disciplinary and Adverse Actions
- 220.127.116.11.15 Grievances
- 18.104.22.168 Employee Development
- 22.214.171.124.1 New Employee Training
- 126.96.36.199.2 Employee Training
- 188.8.131.52.3 Employee Career Learning Plan
- 184.108.40.206.4 Helping People Achieve
- 220.127.116.11.5 Group Manager Development
- 18.104.22.168 Programs and Priorities
- 22.214.171.124.1 Work Categories
- 126.96.36.199.2 Technical Advisors/Issue Specialists
- 188.8.131.52.3 Headquarters Directed Projects
- 184.108.40.206.4 Compliance Initiative Projects (CIP)
- 220.127.116.11.5 Local Source Projects
- 18.104.22.168.6 Compliance Data Environment (CDE)
- 22.214.171.124.7 Governmental Liaison Program
- 126.96.36.199.8 Specialty Areas
- 188.8.131.52.9 Fraud
- 184.108.40.206 Security
- 220.127.116.11 Interactions with Other Functions
- 18.104.22.168.1 Appeals and Area Counsel
- 22.214.171.124.2 Collection
- 126.96.36.199.3 Criminal Investigation
- 188.8.131.52.4 Disclosure
- 184.108.40.206.5 Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration (TIGTA)
- 220.127.116.11.6 Research, Analysis & Statistics (RAS)
- 18.104.22.168.7 Taxpayer Advocate Service (TAS)
- 22.214.171.124.8 Communications & Liaison (C&L)
- 126.96.36.199.9 Campus Contacts
- 188.8.131.52 Collateral Duties
- 184.108.40.206.1 Classroom Instructor
- 220.127.116.11.2 Commissioner Representative
- 18.104.22.168.3 Recruiting
- 22.214.171.124.4 Wage & Investment (W & I) Customer Service
- 126.96.36.199 General Group Management Issues
Part 1. Organization, Finance, and Management
Chapter 4. Resource Guide for Managers
Section 40. SB/SE Field and Office Examination Group Manager
April 05, 2017
(1) This transmits a limited revision of IRM 1.4.40, Resource Guide for Managers, SB/SE Field and Office Examination Group Manager.
(1) Minor editorial changes have been made throughout this IRM and website addresses were reviewed and updated as necessary.
(2) Significant changes to this IRM are listed in the table below.
|IRM Reference||Description of Change|
|IRM 188.8.131.52||Updated the SB/SE Operating Units.|
|IRM 184.108.40.206.8.2||Added clarification that examiners must allow a minimum of 10 business days when the taxpayer requests to consult with a representative.|
|IRM 220.127.116.11.2.6(2)||Added reference to IRM section that contains procedures for secure shipping.|
|IRM 18.104.22.168.4||Clarified the guidance and added Letter 1912 pursuant to Interim Guidance Memorandum SBSE-04-0916-0046.|
|IRM 22.214.171.124.6.1 through IRM 126.96.36.199.6.1.6||Moved sections and renumbered as IRM 188.8.131.52.6.5 through IRM 184.108.40.206.6.5.6.|
|IRM 220.127.116.11.6.2||Moved and renumbered as IRM 18.104.22.168.6.1.|
|IRM 22.214.171.124.6.3||Moved and renumbered as IRM 126.96.36.199.6.2 through 188.8.131.52.6.2.3. In addition, clarified survey before and after assignment procedures. Also added guidance regarding the group manager’s risk analysis and paperless survey procedures.|
|IRM 184.108.40.206.6.4||Moved and renumbered as IRM 220.127.116.11.6.3.|
|IRM 18.104.22.168.6.5||Moved and renumbered as IRM 22.214.171.124.6.4.|
|IRM 126.96.36.199.7||Added guidance for group managers to facilitate receipt of requested information if the taxpayer/representative refuses to provide the requested information.|
|IRM 188.8.131.52.11||Added reminder that group managers should ensure that examiners make follow-up attempts to contact the taxpayer for no response cases.|
|IRM 184.108.40.206.11.5||Clarified group manager procedures related to unagreed cases.|
|IRM 220.127.116.11.11.5.1||New section added to clarify unagreed case procedures for revenue agent group managers.|
|IRM 18.104.22.168.11.5.2||New section added to clarify unagreed case procedures for tax compliance officer group managers.|
|IRM 22.214.171.124||Clarified the group manager’s responsibilities for protecting information and property assigned to their group.|
|IRM 126.96.36.199.1||Clarified the guidance regarding periodic security reviews.|
|IRM 188.8.131.52.1||Removed the previous guidance regarding eligibility for an Appeals conference.|
Michael W. Damasiewicz
Director, Exam–Field and Campus Policy, SE:S:E:HQ:EFCP
Small Business/Self-Employed Division
This section is a supplement to the general guidelines for all group managers contained in IRM 1.4, Resource Guide for Managers.
This section is intended for a first level manager in an Area examination group. This IRM applies to both field and office examination group managers unless specifically directed to "Field " or "Office" Examination.
General guidelines are also found at these links:
Managers' iManage resource center.
Performance Management website.
Human Capital Office website.
National Agreement Resource Center website.
Compliance activities are divided into categories. A general distinction is those activities that require face-to-face interaction and those that can be accomplished without face-to-face interaction. The Service has four operating divisions, each serving a group of taxpayers with similar needs:
Wage and Investment (W & I), serves individual taxpayers, including those who file jointly, with wage and investment income. Compliance issues are found on a limited range of issues such as dependent exemptions, credits, filing status and deductions.
Small Business and Self-Employed (SB/SE), serves approximately 57 million taxpayers comprised of self-employed persons, supplemental income earners, small business corporations and partnerships with assets of less than $10 million, and filers of employment, excise, estate, gift and fiduciary returns.
Large Business and International (LB&I), serves corporations, subchapter S corporations, and partnerships with assets greater than $10 million. These entities typically have large numbers of employees, deal with complicated issues involving tax law and accounting principles, and conduct their operations in an expanding global environment.
Tax-Exempt and Government Entities (TE/GE), serves employee plans, exempt organizations and governmental entities.
The SB/SE Operating Units are:
Collection - enforces filing and payment requirements, secures delinquent returns and collects payments on unpaid accounts. See IRM 184.108.40.206, Collection.
Examination - provides SB/SE taxpayers service by helping them understand and meet tax responsibilities and by applying the tax law with integrity and fairness. See IRM 220.127.116.11, Examination.
Operations Support - provides centralization of all SB/SE support functions, in a customer centric environment, to ensure SB/SE Collection and Examination are properly equipped with the tools and resources to execute compliance activities. See IRM 18.104.22.168, Operations Support.
This section describes the role of a field and office examination group manager.
A group manager is responsible for the actions of a group of employees and instilling organizational values by providing direction and leadership. In addition to providing written and verbal directions, a group manager must lead by example.
A group manager serves as a role model for subordinates, is responsible for encouraging change, and providing suggestions to implement programs.
A group manager is also responsible for developing employees and for inventory management. Listed below are some areas requiring managerial involvement:
Communicating the mission of the Service
Ensuring the actions of the workgroup are aligned with the mission of the Service
Transferring skills, knowledge, and experience
Empowering employees with additional responsibilities
Providing training and developmental experiences
The mission statement for the Service sets forth the overall purpose and direction of our operations. The mission focuses on three strategic goals:
Service to each taxpayer
Service to all taxpayers
Productivity through a quality work environment
In order to assess progress in meeting these goals, the IRS developed a set of balanced measures in three major areas:
Customer Satisfaction – is defined as providing accurate and professional services to internal and external customers in a courteous and professional manner. Examples include:
Providing timely service
Empathizing with customers
Discussing how the IRS is using customer surveys with employees
Employee Satisfaction – is defined as the measure made up of employee perceptions of the management practices, organizational barriers, and the overall work environment that affects their efforts to do a good job. Examples include:
Having a dialogue with employees
Identifying employees' training needs
Ensuring employees receive the training they need to perform job task
Elevating employee workplace issues
Business Results – is defined as generating a productive quantity of work in a quality manner and providing meaningful outreach to all customers. Examples include:
Identifying resources required for employees to adequately perform their jobs
Developing work processes to achieve the Service's goals in the most efficient and effective manner
Engaging employees and embracing ideas that provide best practices for work processes
Interacting regularly with employees to identify opportunities for improving work processes
Recognizing that the group's work is part of the delivery of a servicewide goal
A group manager's accomplishments will be measured by leadership competencies that are linked with the Balanced Measurement System. The leadership competencies are grouped by primary core responsibility areas:
Refer to IRM 1.5.1, The IRS Balanced Performance Measurement System, for additional information.
No goals or targets will be set for Records of Tax Enforcement Results (ROTERS). See 26 CFR 801.1 through 801.8.
An examination business plan is developed annually at the headquarters level. The plan is then subdivided into smaller components to set goals at the operating unit level, Area level, and territory level. Work plans are developed for each level.
In order to properly understand the business plan goals that are set, a group manager must know the definition of key terms. These include:
Term Definition Base Inventory Inventory Necessary to Deliver the Workplan. Cycle Time Length of Time a Return is in process (status 12 to 80-90). DCT Direct Compliance Time See IRM 22.214.171.124.3.1, Direct Compliance Activities-SBSE. DESY Direct Exam Staff Year DET Direct Exam Time See IRM 126.96.36.199.3.1.2, Direct Examination Activity- LMSB. FTE Full Time Equivalent. Overage When a case is in process in excess of 180 days for Office Examination and 270 days for Field Examination. See IRM 188.8.131.52.2(5), Ensure Timely Actions. Rate Hours Per Return. Staff Year Approximately 2000 Hours per year.
The primary responsibility for case quality is at the group level. A group manager conducts both technical, procedural and administrative reviews. These reviews are generally workload reviews, closed case reviews, in-process reviews, on the job visits, and technical time report reviews (Exam Technical Time Report (field examination) and Tax Auditor Daily Report (office examination)). Reviews may be either informal or formal. Informal reviews may not require written documentation. See IRM 184.108.40.206, Guiding and Evaluating Employees, for specific guidance. All documented reviews must be conducted on the Embedded Quality Review System (EQRS).
EQRS is used to conduct all managerial reviews of examiners. EQRS automatically links the quality attributes to an employee's critical job elements and provides a group manager with reports on the performance of employees. The reports provide information on performance relative to the attributes and the critical job elements. The National Quality Review System (NQRS) is a parallel system to EQRS that uses quality attributes to provide an assessment of organizational quality results. The EQRS and NQRS quality attributes are found in the Attribute Job Aid, Document 12354, Field Compliance Embedded Quality, Field & Office Examination Job Aid. IRM 220.127.116.11.4, NQRS and EQRS Reports, for additional information regarding the NQRS system.
All group managers must complete the Embedded Quality (EQ) training available on ELMS at https://elms.web.irs.gov/ prior to conducting reviews on EQRS. The course numbers are #22339 for Field Exam and #26807 for Office Exam.
Contact your Area EQ Coordinator if you have specific EQRS related questions. Area EQ Coordinator contacts can be located at http://mysbse.web.irs.gov/examination/examinationeq/contacts/default.aspx.
Listed below are additional resources that provide guidance to assist in conducting reviews on EQRS:
Examination page located at http://mysbse.web.irs.gov/examination/examinationeq/default.aspx on the Embedded Quality website;
Exam Guide to Applying Attributes in Case Reviews located under Manager Case Reviews on the Examination Page at http://mysbse.web.irs.gov/examination/examinationeq/mgrcasereview/attributes/guide/default.aspx;
Multi-Review Case Guidance located under Manager Case Reviews Examination page at http://mysbse.web.irs.gov/examination/examinationeq/mgrcasereview/ettr/default.aspx. This document will provide helpful guidance for conducting Workload and Examination Technical Time Reviews
See IRM 18.104.22.168.6, ERCS Reports, for ERCS reports that may be useful in conducting a case review.
All contacts must be conducted in a professional and competent manner. IRM 22.214.171.124.3, Ensure Quality Taxpayer Communication, provides information regarding the importance of quality communications.
All contacts must be conducted in a fair and impartial manner.
A group manager must ensure employee contacts are conducted in a manner that is conducive to promoting a positive image of the Service.
When appropriate standardized forms and letters are available, they must be used. The specific wording in these documents has been approved.
Examiners must receive approval from their group manager prior to preparing original correspondence. A group manager must approve the content prior to its use and such approval must be documented in the case file. See IRM 126.96.36.199.3.2, Written Communication, for additional guidance.
See IRM 4.10.1, Overview and Basic Examiner Responsibilities, for additional information concerning taxpayer rights and employee responsibilities when contact is made with taxpayers.
A group manager must have an in-depth working knowledge of the content of Circular 230, Regulations Governing Practice before the Internal Revenue Service.
Ensuring good customer relations with taxpayers is important. A group manager must listen to a taxpayer's concerns or complaints. Complex tax laws and procedures are often the source of many concerns or complaints. A simple explanation or clarification is generally sufficient to resolve most concerns.
One of a group manager's responsibilities is to facilitate discussions between employees and taxpayers. Let the taxpayer fully explain their position. Neither agree nor disagree with the taxpayer until the employee has responded to the taxpayer's concerns. A group manager should avoid quick answers until they are in a position to make a fair and objective decision based on the facts presented by all parties to the examination. After all the facts are determined, a group manager or their employee should promptly respond to the taxpayer's complaint.
Taxpayers have the right to representation at any time during the examination process. If a taxpayer requests time to secure representation, a group manager must ensure examiners allow a reasonable amount of time to do so.
Group managers must take steps to ensure that examiners are complying with IRC 7521, Procedures Involving Taxpayer Interviews. Specifically, examiners are required to:
Suspend the interview with a taxpayer (unless the interview was initiated by an administrative summons issued to the taxpayer under IRC 7602) whenever a taxpayer requests to consult with a representative and allow the taxpayer a minimum of 10 business days to secure representation. See IRM 188.8.131.52.7.2, Request for Representation - Suspension of Interview, for additional guidance as well as the actions an examiner can take during the 10 business days.
Observe the right of the taxpayer to not accompany the representative during an interview in the absence of an administrative summons issued to the taxpayer under IRC 7602.
Obtain appropriate managerial approval to notify the taxpayer, if the employee believes the representative is responsible for unreasonably delaying or hindering the examination of the taxpayer.
Opportunities to reinforce and ensure compliance with IRC 7521 by examiners are:
See IRC 7521(b)(2), and IRC 7521(c), as well as IRM 184.108.40.206.1.2, Request for Representation-Suspension of Interview, and IRM 220.127.116.11, By-pass of a Representative, for more detailed information pertaining to complying with IRC 7521.
Group managers must effectively interact with taxpayers and representatives. Group managers must maintain control over in-process examinations and not permit taxpayers and/or representatives to attempt to stall progress. See IRM 4.11.55, Power of Attorney Rights and Responsibilities, and IRM 4.11.51, Return Preparer Program, for guidance.
If a representative fails to timely respond to an examiner and is creating a hindrance, procrastination, or unreasonable delay, a group manager should review the facts and circumstances to determine if a bypass is warranted.
The authority for bypass procedures are found in Treas. Reg. § 601.506(b). A bypass permits an examiner to contact a taxpayer directly to request information necessary to complete an examination. The representative still continues to represent the taxpayer and is provided copies of all correspondence provided to the taxpayer. IRM 18.104.22.168, Bypass of a Representative, details the procedures for bypass of a representative.
Time and attendance is documented in the Single-Entry Time Recording (SETR) portion of the Totally Automated Personnel System (TAPS).
A group manager is responsible for the following:
Ensuring that the time and attendance records are correct for each reporting period
Administering the leave rules, regulations, and procedures in accordance with established IRS policies, while balancing the needs of both the Service and employees
Complying with all requirements for scheduling and documenting leave, including securing any required signatures
Establishing leave schedules early in the year to provide for adequate coverage at all times, to afford employees the opportunity to use their annual leave, and to avoid forfeiture of leave and compensatory time
Ensuring leave charges are properly recorded to the appropriate leave category
Counseling employees on policies, regulations, and procedures related to leave and absence
Identifying and correcting, by appropriate methods, abuse of leave
Timely requesting and receiving authorization for overtime and for compensatory time from the appropriate management level. This is done using Form 2787, Authorization and Report of Overtime Worked
Reporting pay and leave issues to the servicing Transactional Processing Center (TPC) and working with them to resolve problems
The group manager is also responsible for checking Document 11678, 2016 National Agreement - Internal Revenue Service (IRS) and National Treasury Employees Union (NTEU), hereinafter referenced as Document 11678, National Agreement for leave policies and procedures. The following Agreement Articles may be of interest:
22 - Work Schedules
23 - Hours of Work
24 - Overtime
31 - Leave Sharing Program
32 - Annual Leave
33 - Family Leave
34 - Sick Leave
35 - Leaves of Absence
36 - Excused Absence (Administrative Leave)
This subsection provides specific guidance on workload processes and tools available to a group manager to effectively and efficiently manage a group. Included is information relative to the various automated systems that a group manager has responsibility for ensuring are updated and safeguarded.
A group manager must maintain effective controls to:
Physically protect returns and return information
Maintain an adequate inventory of tax returns
Ensure prompt completion and closure of examinations
Protect statutes of limitations
The management of a group’s inventory and the accuracy of the case inventory database are critical to the success of a group. Accurate inventory controls will assist in:
Maintaining appropriate statute controls
Responding to both internal and external customers
Ensuring priority case work is readily identified and promptly worked
Ensuring adequate examiner inventory
The primary automated tool used to manage inventory at a group level is the Examination Returns Control System (ERCS). Data entered through ERCS updates the Audit Information Management System (AIMS).
A group manager is responsible for ensuring that information is protected commensurate with its level of sensitivity. See IRM 1.4.6, Managers Security Handbook.
A group manager must ensure that employee access to the Integrated Data Retrieval System (IDRS) and ERCS is properly safeguarded.
The support staff at the group level may be assigned primary responsibility for conducting IDRS research. Their level of access to IDRS command codes will be greater than that of managers and examiners. Generally, managers and examiners at the group level should only have IDRS research capability.
A group manager is required to review IDRS usage reports to ensure employee access levels are appropriate [(IDRS Online Reports Services (IORS)].
A group manager's security responsibilities include but are not limited to the following:
Controlling employees' access to IDRS by using the Online 5081 application to initiate or change user access to automated information systems
Annual Online 5081 certification
Ensuring employees have only those command codes necessary to accomplish their official duties and sensitive command code usage is closely monitored
Ensuring profile changes due to separation, work assignments, termination or non-work status, are completed in a timely manner
If an employee has a case in their inventory, they can perform appropriate IDRS research without securing specific managerial approval. This includes research on employee audit cases in their inventory.
Employees are prohibited from accessing their own account using IDRS. However, an employee can submit a request for their personal tax information through the Wage and Investment Division (W&I).
See IRM 10.5.5, IRS Unauthorized Access, Attempted Access or Inspection of Taxpayer Records (UNAX) Program Policy, Guidance and Requirements, and IRM 22.214.171.124.2, Taxpayer Browsing Protection Act, for Unauthorized Access (UNAX) rules.
See IRM 10.8.34, IDRS Security Controls, for IORS procedures, annual Online 5081 certification process, and the use of Form 11377, Taxpayer Data Access.
To ensure the integrity of the system, a group manager must limit opportunities for access to the group inventory records. Generally, only the group manager and support staff should have access. With any group inventory and case control system the following rules must be enforced.
The systems must be password protected.
Users must always log off when leaving their computer.
Persons without a "need to know" should not be allowed to view information on the computer or in hardcopy.
The Taxpayer Browsing Protection Act, IRC 7213A provides a criminal misdemeanor penalty for the willful, unauthorized inspection of tax returns or return information. See IRM 10.5.5, IRS Unauthorized Access, Attempted Access or Inspection of Taxpayer Records (UNAX) Program Policy, Guidance and Requirements and IRM 126.96.36.199.2, Taxpayer Browsing Protection Act.
A group manager must ensure employees complete their annual UNAX Awareness certification. See IRM 188.8.131.52.2, Mandatory Briefings, for information on annual certification.
IDRS is the system the Service uses to access taxpayer account file information on Master File (MF) and Non-Master File (NMF). This system is the parent to all enforcement division management systems of the Service. Within the IDRS system are AIMS and Partnership Control System (PCS).
AIMS is a system used by Examination to control returns, input assessment/adjustments to Master File, and provide management reports. While a tax return or an open account is charged to Examination, the AIMS data base tracks its location, age, and status. Information on the management reports can be found in IRM 4.4.27, Reports.
The accuracy and integrity of AIMS information is a group manager's responsibility although primary responsibility for the verification of the data should be assigned to a member of the support staff. A group manager must have a working knowledge of AIMS procedures and reports to provide effective management oversight of a group.
PCS is a system that contains information regarding the examinations of flow-through entities (Partnerships, S Corporations, Trusts) and the related investors. PCS controls both TEFRA and Non-TEFRA entities. PCS controls for entities are established with information submitted at the group level. The system establishes a linkage between the key entity and the related returns. It ensures that all investor returns are established on AIMS. Also, it ensures returns are charged to the Campus TEFRA/non-TEFRA function or to Area examination personnel so that statutes are protected and necessary adjustments may be made. A group manager is responsible for the accuracy and integrity of the information input into the system.
ERCS is an automated inventory management system. It is used for controlling tax returns, penalty investigations, open accounts, and recording technical time charges. Through the use of an interactive menu-driven database, records can be requested, assigned/reassigned, updated, and closed. A group manager must use various ERCS reports to effectively and efficiently manage group operations.
Updating ERCS will update the Summary Examination Time Transmission System (SETTS) monthly and AIMS daily. On a weekly basis, an AIMS file is run against the ERCS database, and any differences are updated or a difference report is printed that must be reconciled (primarily by the group support staff). Refer to the ERCS IRM 4.7.5, Group and Territory, and the AIMS/ERCS website at http://mysbse.web.irs.gov/exam/mis/default.aspx.
The Summary Examination Time Transmission System (SETTS) consolidates examiners’ time entries for electronic summarization. An examiner's time charges are input primarily by the support staff using the ERCS Exam Technical Time Report (ETTR), formerly Form 4502, Exam Technical Time Report (field examination) or ERCS Tax Auditor Daily Report (Daily), formerly Form 4606, Daily Activity Record, (office examination). See IRM 4.9.1, Outline of System.
This subsection describes various case control procedures used to manage the group's inventory.
When an examination is initiated, controls are requested using Form 5345-D, Examination Request - ERCS (Examination Returns Control System) Users.
A group manager must ensure there is a valid reason for the request and the entries on the form are correct prior to approval. Refer to the AIMS/Processing Handbook, IRM 4.4.23, Openings.
When completing Form 5345-D, Examination Request-ERCS (Examination Returns Control System) Users, an examiner can establish controls with or without ordering the original tax return. See IRM Exhibit 4.4.23-3, Form 5345-D Assistance
Source Code 45 is used to order reference returns (e.g., a tax return secured for information only). The reason for the request must be annotated on Form 5345-D. A copy of the approved Form 5345-D must be attached to the back of the referenced return as a permanent record. Upon receipt of the original reference return, an examiner must determine within 30 days of receipt, whether the return will be examined or closed on AIMS.
It takes approximately two weeks for full AIMS controls to be established. When an original tax return document is required, it will generally take between six to eight weeks to receive the original document.
The group support staff must maintain Form 5345-D in a pending requisition file until AIMS controls are established and, when applicable, the original tax return is received in the group. A group manager must ensure that appropriate follow-ups are conducted by the group's support staff, when necessary, to secure AIMS controls and, when applicable, receipt of an original tax return.
For additional information on completion of Form 5345-D, refer to IRM 4.4.23, Openings, and the ERCS Group Handbook at http://mysbse.web.irs.gov/examination/mis/manuals/13131.aspx.
Delinquent returns and substitutes for returns require special procedures. See IRM 4.12.1, Nonfiled Returns, and IRM 4.4.9, Delinquent and Substitute for Return Processing.
It is a group manager's responsibility to ensure that case databases (ERCS/AIMS) are timely and properly updated to reflect the correct status code, source code, statute date, organization code, claim amount, project code, SFR activity code, and aging reason code. A group manager will be actively involved in the progress of each employee’s work and ensure that updates are made timely by employees.
Source codes, status codes and project codes are important because they allow for a compilation of data regarding inventory levels and composition, resource utilization, and program accomplishments. Data entered into AIMS is relied upon throughout the Service when assessing program accomplishments and setting goals. Additional information can be found in IRM 4.4.1, Introduction, at:
IRM Exhibit 4.4.1-1, Reference Guide- Source Codes
IRM 4.4.1-1, Reference Guide- Status Codes
Project Codes can be located on the AIMS/ERCS website at http://mysbse.web.irs.gov/exam/mis/data/default.aspx
Push codes are used to allow controls to be established when no record of a return filing is present on master file. See IRM Exhibit 4.4.1-1, Reference Guide - Push Codes.
Cases are closed from the group on ERCS and RGS (Report Generation Software). Refer to IRM 4.7.5, Group and Territory, IRM 4.4.12, Examined Closings, Surveyed Claims, and Partial Assessments, and RGS for Managers and Secretaries located on the RGS website at http://mysbse.web.irs.gov/examination/rgs/training/14674.aspx.
Shipment of returns requires the use of Form 3210, Document Transmittal, to provide a method for tracking receipt at the shipment destination. Form 3210 can be manually prepared or computer generated by ERCS.
Form 3210 must identify the taxpayer’s name, tax period(s), to whom it is being sent, the originator, and date sent. The sender must sign and date the form and keep the Part 4 copy for group control. For procedures on shipping personally identifiable information (PII) information, see IRM 10.2.13.4.4.1, Shipping Personally Identifiable Information (PII).
Upon receipt of the package, the recipient must verify the contents, sign Form 3210, and return the acknowledgment portion to the sender. See IRM 184.108.40.206, Multi-Year Examination Cases with At Least One Agreed/No-Change Year and One Unagreed Year, for shipment of multi-year examination cases with at least one agreed/no-change year and one unagreed year.
A group manager should refer to IRM 25.6.23, Examination Process - Assessment Statute of Limitations Controls, for comprehensive instructions regarding statute controls and responsibilities for protecting the period of time for assessment of tax. Should there appear to be a conflict between the provisions of IRM 1.4.40 and IRM 25.6.23, with respect to the limitations on the period of time for making tax assessments, IRM 25.6.23 controls.
For all tax returns which are filed (whether timely or late filed), statute controls are required to be established not later than 180 days prior to the actual assessment statute expiration date (based on the later of the date the return was filed or due, without regard to extensions). Statute expiration dates may be determined by referring to IRM 220.127.116.11.4, Statute Of Limitations Chart for Tax Returns.
As tax returns or ERCS/AIMS data are received in or charged to the group, it is extremely important to screen the return and/or ERCS/AIMS data to determine the accuracy of the assessment statute information and to identify the need for establishing statute controls. The statute information reflected on ERCS/AIMS is not to be accepted as accurate but must be confirmed by reviewing case file information and conducting appropriate IDRS research.
If a tax return has not been filed, statute controls are established at 180 days before the normal assessment statute expiration date had the return been timely filed, or at the time the substitute for return is input, whichever is earlier. If alpha code EE is used in the ASED field for the nonfiler, then ERCS will automatically generate the Form 895 when the forms are generated for the group by the support staff. See alpha code EE instructions in IRM Exhibit 25.6.23-3, Instructions for Updating the Statute on AIMS.
ERCS must be updated to reflect the accurate Assessment Statute Expiration Date (ASED) on the entire inventory of the group. ERCS will then update AIMS.
A group manager has the authority and responsibility to allow the normal assessment statute of limitations to expire if certain special conditions are present, as described in detail in IRM Exhibit 25.6.23-3. In addition, see IRM 18.104.22.168.6.2, Reliance on IRC Provisions Which Extend Normal Assessment Statute, for those instances when Territory Manager concurrence is required to allow the period for assessment to expire based on a special statute condition.
Certain conditions warrant soliciting a consent to extend the statute of limitations. See IRM 22.214.171.124.1, Assessment. The list in IRM 126.96.36.199.1 is not all inclusive and in certain circumstances consents can be solicited before the 180–day time frame specified, but for situations other than those listed, the case file must be documented by the Group Manager with the reasons approval to extend the statute was granted.
Group managers do not need to document the case file to allow an examiner to solicit a consent if the consent is needed so the case can go to Appeals. See IRM 188.8.131.52.1 (1), 30-Day Letters, for additional guidance.
IRC 6501 (c)(4)(B), enacted by the IRS Restructuring and Reform Act of 1998 (RRA 98), requires the Service to notify the taxpayer of certain rights in each instance when a request to extend the assessment period is solicited. See IRM 184.108.40.206, Notification of Taxpayer’s Rights, for detailed instructions for notifying taxpayers of their rights.
A group manager must maintain statute controls on all returns in a group manager’s custody to ensure that accurate statute information is entered on ERCS/AIMS. Statute expiration information entered on ERCS is automatically sent to AIMS but it's possible the update can reject. The manager must monitor reject reports to ensure the AIMS database is correct. This includes returns:
Controlled on AIMS; and
Investigations/Examinations controlled on ERCS, but not AIMS, e.g., penalty cases. See IRM 220.127.116.11.4, Area Office Group Statute Controls, for detailed instructions.
The statute control system must monitor the following returns:
Returns with statute expiring within 180 days (at a minimum)
All alpha statute returns except for ZZ alpha statutes
Group statute controls must be contemporaneously maintained, monitored, and reconciled with AIMS Table 4.1, Returns with Statute Date Pending. See IRM 18.104.22.168.9.2, Verification of ERCS and AIMS Tables 4.1 and 4.0 Data, for detailed information on verification of ERCS and AIMS Table 4.1 data.
ERCS generates a Form 895, Notice of Statute Expiration, for each return in the group whose statute expires within a specified number of days (usually 210, but at a minimum 180). The Form 895 must be issued to the employee charged with the return.
It is the responsibility of the examiner to reconcile the information on Form 895 with information in the case file and taxpayer account data to verify the accuracy of the assessment statute expiration date and return the Form 895 to the group manager within 10 days of receipt.
If the examiner or specialist does not return the completed Form 895 to the manager within 10 days of the date the Form 895 is generated, the manager will follow up with the examiner or specialist to secure the Form 895.
The group manager must secure the Form 895 from the examiner and approve the accuracy of the completed Form 895 information within 20 days of the date the Form 895 is generated.
The support staff must update ERCS within 3 days of the date that the manager approves the accuracy of the information reflected on the Form 895.
See IRM 22.214.171.124.3, Form 895 Completion Requirements for Managers.
Any return with alpha codes in the statute date for which a Form 895 has not been issued will generate a Form 895 (except for ZZ alpha statutes).
When a case is transferred from one work group to another, the receiving group manager assumes the responsibility for statute control upon receipt of the case. Accordingly, the accuracy of the assessment statute information must be verified by the receiving organization and a Form 895 prepared if warranted. If the ERCS/AIMS shows that the control is charged to the group but receipt of the case file in the group is delayed, the group charged with the return must take action to locate the return if the ASED is imminent.
The support staff will generally identify the relevant returns, print Form 895 and forward those forms to examiners. A group manager must emphasize the support staff's and examiner's responsibilities for timely and accurately processing Forms 895.
See IRM Exhibit 25.6.23-2, ERCS Form 895 Instructions, for line by line instructions for ERCS generated Form 895.
See IRM Exhibit 25.6.23-1, Form 895 Instructions, for line by line instructions for manually prepared Form 895.
Imminent assessment statute cases require special handling and it is imperative that examiners and managers allow adequate time from case closing until the statute expiration date for the necessary case review, case processing and deficiency assessment.
When an unagreed case includes a tax period that has less than 90 days remaining on the assessment statute of limitations at the time of closing from the group, the group manager must contact the Technical Services Group Manager concerning the issuance of a Statutory Notice of Deficiency (SNOD). CCP is to be contacted in agreed case situations when the statute has less than 90 days remaining at the time of closing from the group. See IRM 126.96.36.199.2, Non-TEFRA Cases With Less Than 90 Days to ASED. TEFRA cases should be closed from the group prior to 240 days of the ASED. See IRM 188.8.131.52.3, TEFRA Cases With Less Than 240 Days to ASED.
IRM 184.108.40.206.2.8, Statute Expiration Reporting Responsibilities and Procedures for SB/SE Area Office Involved Directly with or Providing Support for Tax Return Examinations, discusses preparation and submission of Form 3999, Statute Expiration Report, and Form 3999-T, Statute Expiration Report, for a TEFRA key case.
A preliminary Form 3999 is required to be submitted to the Territory Manager within 3 days of discovery of a potentially expired statute. See IRM Exhibit 25.6.1-4, SB/SE Statute Expiration Reporting Timetable (for examination-related activities).
Group managers are responsible for maintaining a control system to monitor cases when a 30-day letter has been issued. ERCS reports may be used for this purpose.
Revenue agent (RA) groups: When a 30-day letter is issued the returns must be updated to status code 13. Group managers can use the ERCS Status Report to monitor cases in status 13 in order to determine appropriate follow up actions.
Tax compliance officer (TCO) groups: When a 30-day letter is issued, the returns must be updated to action code 04 and purged for 15 calendar days. If the taxpayer does not respond within 15 days, the examiner will issue Letter 1912, Follow-Up Letter Transmitting Examination Reports, and update the action code to 07 with a purge date for 15 calendar days. Group managers can use the ERCS Action Code Report to monitor cases in action code 04 and 07 in order to determine appropriate follow up actions.
For additional information and guidance regarding 30-day letters see IRM 220.127.116.11.1, 30-Day Letters.
A group manager must plan, monitor, and direct input of work to accomplish program priorities and effectively utilize resources.
A group manager must maintain within the group:
Sufficient inventory levels (started and unstarted)
Appropriate categories of returns (as established in the Examination Plan)
To do so, a group manager must:
Consider experience and training level of examiners
Anticipate and factor current and future priority work
Consider historical rates of related pickups
Anticipate details and other assignments of examiners
Area procedures will provide guidance regarding the assignment of status 10 inventory to examiners.
The examination and disposition of income tax returns generally should be completed within 26 months for individual returns and within 27 months for business returns. See IRM 18.104.22.168.2, Examination Cycles, for guidance.
A group’s work can be divided into three categories.
Mandatory — Neither a group manager nor an examiner has the authority or discretion to survey; these returns must be worked.
Priority — Both a group manager and an examiner are empowered to survey if the case justifies such action. However, once the commitment is made to examine, it should be handled expeditiously.
Discretionary — Both a group manager and an examiner are expected to evaluate the degree of noncompliance before initiating the examination.
See IRM 22.214.171.124.1, Work Categories, for a list of priority cases.
If priority returns are in process and the group's status 10 inventory is inadequate, a group manager may need to order returns.
Requests for new work should be submitted to Planning and Special Programs (PSP) through the territory manager. Requests should include an explanation of the work required based on the grade level of the agents needing the work. PSP monitors priorities, program requirements, and local directives and will provide coordination to furnish the proper type of work.
A group manager should always be alert to the potential for areas of noncompliance and prepare project recommendations where appropriate.
While there are a number of factors that affect the time it takes to receive returns, a group manager should be aware of the general time frames involved and plan accordingly.
Many factors influence the actions a group manager may take when assigning work. Some examples include:
Volume, complexity, specialization, and diversity of work flowing into the group
Structure, experience, and training level of the examiners
Geographic location of examiners and status 10 inventory
Status of in-process work
Program/project cases, including National Research Program (NRP), may be assigned to newly-trained examiners, when appropriate, to enhance their career development. When making case assignment decisions, group managers should consider the complexity of the case plus the experience and training level of the examiner.
In accordance with IRM 126.96.36.199.1 paragraph (2), Assessment, group managers should ensure examiners do not initiate an examination on any return with less than 12 months remaining on the statute of limitations for assessment, without prior managerial approval. Therefore, cases with less than one year on the statute of limitations should generally not be assigned to an examiner unless significant issues are present on the return.
The Examination Program Letter is issued each fiscal year by Headquarters to provide guidance on program emphasis and effective utilization of resources. Each Area establishes its own goals and priorities tailored to meet those outlined by Headquarters. Territory managers will communicate the Area goals and priorities to their group managers.
When a group manager assigns returns to examiners, mandatory start and priority cases must receive first consideration. While transfer of cases between examiners is not desirable, it should be accomplished when necessary to achieve priority needs.
It is essential that a group manager understands all priorities, monitors them closely, and ensures their timely completion.
While cases should be started in accordance with Examination priorities, there may be returns that in the judgment of the manager or examiner warrant survey without taxpayer contact.
A return is surveyed before assignment if it is disposed of before contact with the taxpayer and prior to assignment to an examiner.
A return is surveyed after assignment if after completing the initial return screening and/or the pre-contact analysis and evaluation of audit potential, but before examining any books and records, the examiner concludes that an examination is not warranted. See IRM 188.8.131.52, Initial Return Screening, and IRM 184.108.40.206, Decision to Survey a Return.
Prior to assignment of a non-mandatory return or amended return, the group manager must conduct a thorough review of the return and case file information to complete a risk analysis and determine if the return should be assigned to an examiner in the group, transferred to another group, or closed survey before assignment.
The group manager's risk analysis considers:
Nature of the work (e.g. non-mandatory, priority, etc.),
Whether the examination will result in a material change,
Large, unusual or questionable (LUQ) items including those not selected during classification,
No change in prior year,
Statute of limitations,
Examination cycle, and
Group resources (e.g., the number of returns assigned to the group exceeds the number that can be examined and processed within the examination cycle; returns outside the group’s area of expertise; etc.).
After the risk analysis, if the group manager determines the return:
Warrants further review by an examiner, it will be assigned or transferred.
Should be closed survey before assignment, the group manager must follow the procedures in IRM 220.127.116.11.6.2.2 to document the reason for the survey.
A group manager may survey non-mandatory cases before assignment if completion of the group manager's risk analysis indicates the return should be surveyed. It is critical that a group manager closely evaluate work needs when ordering returns, and that surveys be kept to a minimum.
Generally, group managers must use Disposal Code (DC) 31, Survey Before Assignment by PSP or Group, to close a return as survey before assignment.
Group managers must use DC 34, Surveyed Claims, to close claims for refund and requests for abatement as survey before assignment. In addition, claims for refund and requests for abatement surveyed before assignment cannot be closed paperless. See IRM 18.104.22.168.22.214.171.124 below.
The group manager may survey a return before assignment using paperless survey procedures if at the time of closure the only paper in the case file is an electronic print (BRTVUE, CDE, TRDBV, TRPRT, TRDBB, IMFOLT, TXMOD), and:
There are no workpapers or other documentation (e.g., Form 1900, Income Tax Survey After Assignment) in the case file that needs to be retained, and
The original return was NOT requested (page 2 of the AMDISA does not show "Return Requested" ).
If the return does not meet the above criteria, it must be closed using paper survey before assignment procedures. See IRM 126.96.36.199.188.8.131.52.
The group manager must document the reason to survey a return before assignment using a Survey Reason Code (SRC) on Form 5351, Examination Non-Examined Closings, to the right of the Disposal Code field. The SRC (listed in paragraph (3) below) must also be entered on ERCS when closing the return from the group.
The SRC values and definitions available for paperless survey procedures are:
Survey Reason Code A: No Large, Unusual or Questionable (LUQ) Items– Use if the primary reason for the survey is because there are no LUQ items on the return.
Survey Reason Code B: No Change in Prior Year– Use if the primary reason for the survey is that the same issues identified on the current year return were just as significant in either of the two preceding years and were no-changed or had a small tax change.
Survey Reason Code C: Beyond Cycle (includes statute issue) – Use if the primary reason for the survey is based upon currency and/or statute considerations.
Survey Reason Code D: Lack of Resources– Use if the primary reason for the survey is due to a lack of resources.
The return must be updated to status code 51 on ERCS. See IRM 184.108.40.206.3(14), Transfers and Closing, for additional guidance.
The group must e-Fax Form 5351 and Form 3210 to Memphis CCP. See IRM 220.127.116.11.1.3, Form 5351, for instructions on completion of the form.
The group manager must use paper survey procedures to survey a return before assignment if it doesn’t meet the conditions in IRM 18.104.22.168.22.214.171.124 paragraph (1).
If the primary reason for the survey is other than those indicated in SRCs A through D listed in IRM 126.96.36.199.188.8.131.52 above, the group manager must document the SRC E: Other, on Form 5351, and include Form 1900 in the administrative case file clearly explaining the reason for the survey. See IRM 184.108.40.206.1.3, Form 5351, for instructions on completion of the form.
If a return is closed as survey before assignment using paper survey before assignment procedures, the group manager must sign and date a stamp imprinted on each return (or return print). The format of the stamp should be as follows:
CLOSED—SURVEY BEFORE ASSIGNMENT
By ________________ Date__________
The return must be updated to status code 51 on ERCS and closed to Memphis CCP using DC 31. See IRM 220.127.116.11.3(14), Transfers and Closing, for additional guidance.
Prior to surveying a claim for refund or request for abatement, managers must conduct a risk analysis, see IRM 18.104.22.168.6.2.1.
Form 5344 is required to be completed to process the survey before assignment of a claim for refund or request for abatement because it results in a full allowance. See IRM 22.214.171.124, Surveyed Claims, Disposal Code 34, for instructions on completing Form 5344 for this purpose.
The group manager must document the reason for surveying a claim for refund or request for abatement on Form 1900 or an activity record.
The group manager must sign and date a stamp imprinted on each return (or return print). The format of the stamp should be as follows:
CLOSED—SURVEY BEFORE ASSIGNMENT
By ________________ Date__________
The return must be updated to status code 51 on ERCS and closed to Memphis CCP using DC 34. See IRM 126.96.36.199.3(14), Transfers and Closing, for additional guidance.
Group managers are required to indicate concurrence with the examiner’s decision to survey the return after assignment by signing and dating the stamp imprinted on each return (or return print). See IRM 188.8.131.52 for survey after assignment procedures used by examiners.
There are instances when it is determined that an office examination case requires a field examination. This determination may occur at any time during the audit process; however, the decision to transfer the case should be made as early as possible. See IRM 184.108.40.206, Transferring Office Examination Cases to Field Examination, for detailed procedures.
Nonfiler cases may be assigned to a group as a result of:
Package audit procedures in open examinations
These cases require special treatment and consideration. Review IRM 4.12.1, Nonfiled Returns, for additional procedures.
Every employee must perform work consistent with the grade of their position.
See IRM 220.127.116.11.6.5.1, Guidelines for Determining the Grade Levels of Field Examination Cases, which provides guidelines for the grading of all field individual, corporate, and partnership returns. The IRM provides case assignment guides for other types of work.
During case assignment the group manager will review the case and, based on the grading criteria, determine the grade level for assignment. A final grade is determined at case closing and entered on the electronic Form 5344, Examination Closing Record, within RGS, if available, based on issues developed in the case.
Employees may perform some work above or below their grade level.
A group manager may provide an employee with the opportunity to perform a limited quantity of higher graded work, when appropriate, to enhance their career development.
A group manager must ensure, prior to the assignment of higher-graded work, that such work will not require more than 25 percent of the examiner’s direct examination time (DET). Review Document 11678, National Agreement II, Article 16, for details. Retroactive pay is required when it is determined that the time spent on higher-graded work exceeds 25 percent in any four-month period. A group manager should either assign the work at the appropriate grade level or secure permission for a temporary promotion in advance. The National Agreement also provides for opportunities for developmental work in LB&I without a temporary promotion.
Once a case is placed in process, it is difficult for a group manager to control the time applied to the case. It is also difficult to control DET versus total time. Adequate managerial involvement is critical to ensure the 25 percent DET is not inadvertently exceeded when higher graded work is assigned to an examiner for developmental purposes.
This text provides guidance to a group manager for assigning and determining the final grade levels of regular field examination income tax cases.
The objectives of this guide are to establish a uniform system for evaluating income tax cases selected for assignment to revenue agents under the "one case, one agent" concept; to provide a better basis for determining workloads for financial planning; to provide valuable information in making position classification determinations; and to improve the utilization of an RA’s time and talents.
This guide will also aid in reviewing internal RA positions for grade structure change purposes. It does not evaluate an RA’s performance. In addition, it cannot be considered as the sole predictor of the appropriate overall grade level for individual positions. Variables such as extent of supervision or the impact of other duties are not given consideration in the guide.
It is emphasized this is primarily a guide and not a substitute for supervisory judgment.
These guidelines apply to all individual returns (non-business and business), fiduciary returns, all types of corporation and partnership returns.
For the purpose of this guidance, a case is defined as the primary return for one year plus other returns, if any, involving interrelated interests and/or transactions that require concurrent examination. The primary return is the return around which related entities and other types of returns revolve, regardless of how and when selected or assigned. Other returns are defined to include returns subsequent and/or prior to the primary return of the taxpayer, as well as returns for related taxpayers for the primary year and subsequent and/or prior years. When the primary return and related returns are examined by the same agent, the related returns will usually (for Management Information System purposes) carry the same grade as the primary return. If related entities are examined by other agents, each group of entities examined by a separate agent will be graded as a separate case under this guide.
This guidance has four parts as follows:
PART I: Chart of Case Grading Factors (based on GS–512 Classification Standards)
PART II: NAICS Codes
PART III: Probable Grade Levels of Cases Based on Type of Industry/Occupation, and Size
PART IV: Matrix of Issues that may change determination made in Part I
The case grading guidelines discussed in this IRM are not intended to cover all possible factors that may influence a final case grade. New projects or programs, and other unusual situations that were not present in the sample at the time this guide was developed, will require a group manager to use judgment in grading a case. More reliance must be placed on the case grading factors in Part I for these situations.
Part I consists of the position classification standard for the GS–512 RA occupation which forms the basis for determining the grade of a case. The standards have been adapted to evaluate cases rather than positions, therefore, factors such as supervision/guidance have not been included.
The case grading factors listed in the table below should be used for the final grading of cases.
Part I — Chart of Case Grading Factors In arriving at a final grade, all factors do not have to be met, however, normally, more than one of the most important factors is necessary. These are: Accounting Systems and Methods, Issues and Knowledge, Guidelines and Tax Laws, and Scope and Effect. GS–11 GS–12 GS–13 1. Accounting Systems 1. Accounting Systems 1. Accounting Systems Independently examines systems which require a basic knowledge of principles/ methods of accounting and auditing as found in a variety of individuals, relatively small businesses, exempt organizations, and simple employee plans. Systems involve a variety of financial operations and accounting methods or specialized accounting practices unique to a particular industry. Use of basic investigative procedures to elicit information and establish facts. In addition to GS–11 characteristics, the following concepts should be involved: Comprehensive knowledge of the principles/ methods of accounting and auditing to plan and conduct independently the complete range of examination and related investigations of a broad range of sizable business operations. Systems involve a variety of complex financial operations and unusual accounting methods or specialized accounting practices unique to a particular industry. Uses investigative skills to analyze incomplete records and reconstruct transactions from third party records. Develop information relative to complex fraud. In addition to GS–12 characteristics, the following concepts should be involved: Mastery of the principles/ methods of accounting, auditing and corporate financial management to plan, coordinate, and conduct examinations of large, complex businesses, including those with substantial subsidiaries, diversified activities multiple partners, and national and international scope and operations. Accounting systems of size and complexity may warrant planning and coordinating the work of others. GS–11 GS–12 GS–13 2. Issues/Knowledge 2. Issues/Knowledge 2. Issues/Knowledge Fundamental knowledge of business and trade practices, procedures and conditions to analyze tax returns and related records to determine the reasonableness of deductible items, the reliability of reported income and expenses, including probable earnings in a wide variety of small businesses/industries and similar questions extending beyond the area covered by specific accounting or legal guides. In addition to GS–11 characteristics, the following concepts should be considered: Knowledge of business financial management principles and practices concerning a variety of kinds and sizes of businesses, or specialized knowledge in a particular industry to (1) determine sources of income and verify expenses, (2) judge the propriety of such matters as intercompany transactions, accumulation of surplus, or compensation of officers, (3) examine trust activities and transactions in order to determine unrelated business income or prohibited transactions, or (4) determine items related to pension plans and appropriate deductions. In addition to GS–12 characteristics, the following concepts should be involved: Specialized knowledge of major industries may be required so that expert judgements can be applied to business transactions. Business transactions may include mergers, acquisitions, leverage buyouts, and similar transactions GS–11 GS–12 GS–13 3. Guidelines/Tax Law 3. Guidelines/Tax Law 3. Guidelines/Tax Law Guidelines include basic tax laws, agency policies, rules and regulations to determine the taxpayer’s correct tax liability. Guidelines normally are specific to issues, but because of number/variety of issues, research is required to locate precedents. In addition to GS–11 characteristics, cases require research and analysis of the Internal Revenue Code, rulings, court decisions, and agency policies to examine returns where tax law or precedent cases do not directly apply including consideration of judicial decisions and legislative intent in cases involving the adoption of precedents. In addition to GS–12 characteristics, cases require the use of the Internal Revenue Code, rulings, court decisions to resolve problems where there is little or no previous interpretation of statutory provisions. Laws are highly subjective, precedents are non existent, obscure or conflicting and significant tax change or precedent setting issues are involved. GS–11 GS–12 GS–13 4. Scope and Effect 4. Scope and Effect 4. Scope and Effect Results of audits affect the taxpayer by requiring corrective action for prior and current tax years and having a deterrent effect for future tax years. The impact may extend to other related taxpayers and/or unrelated taxpayers throughout whole industries. In addition to GS–11 characteristics results of the audit affect the tax liability and, therefore profitability of major business entities and in some instances the treatment of accounting methods and techniques for tax purposes as they are employed throughout whole industries. In addition to GS–12 characteristics, tax results are of major significance which affects the financial condition of many categories of taxpayers involving very large tax responsibilities. Important principles are developed resulting in new precedents. GS–11 GS–12 GS–13 5. Contacts 5. Contacts 5. Contacts Generally involve individual proprietor, corporate official, self-professional, most represented by local practitioners. The purpose of contacts is to influence and persuade the taxpayer or representative to comply with requirements, to provide information to resolve outstanding problems and issues or to pay tax liability. Contacts hold strong opposing views. They may be hostile, skeptical or uncooperative requiring the agent to use tact, persuasiveness, and diplomacy to obtain the desired results. In addition to GS–11 characteristics, the following concepts should be involved: Officials of corporations of significant size, public officials, or practitioners of considerable attainment. Prominence of taxpayer presents problem of publicity or attitudes in locality. In addition to GS–12 characteristics, cases involve contacts with persons who are prominent because of their reputation in their field, especially the accounting and tax fields; officials of large businesses with national reputations.
The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) replaced the Principle Industry Activity (PIA) and the Principle Business Activity (PBA) PIA/PBA codes for tax periods 199812 and subsequent for individual returns. These codes appeared on some corporate and partnership returns starting in 1997 due to fiscal year overlaps.
Reference will be made to the appropriate NAICS to determine the class of the case. The primary return NAICS will be the determinant factor for placement in the appropriate class. If no NAICS appears on a return, group managers will determine the proper class based upon a review of the case file. Once a class has been determined, Parts I, III and IV should be used to determine the final grade. See NAICS Codes on AIMS and ERCS, for NAICS classification codes.
The listing below reflects the respective Class Number for individual, business and fiduciary returns:
•Class 1 – Manufacturing, Construction, Mining
•Class 2 – Retail, Wholesale, Transportation
•Class 3 – Services, Farming
•Class 4 – Financial and Utilities
•Class 5 – Nonbusiness Individual and Fiduciary
The type of business or occupation and its relative size as measured by total assets and/or gross receipts and the dollar criteria for each business type is indicative of the issues encountered, tax law knowledge and accounting complexities normally encountered by revenue agents at the GS–12 and GS–13 levels. Part III is most applicable to the assignment of cases to revenue agents; whereas all four parts of the guide must be used when the case closes and a final grade is assigned.
The following criteria may be used for both case assignment and final grading. Size criteria alone must not be relied upon in arriving at a final grade; more weight should be placed on the case grading factors in Part I. If a case is graded at GS–11 based on industry class and size, and an upgradable issue is identified on the return, the case may be upgraded. See Part IV for the listing of upgradable issues.
The dollar criteria for each industry type was derived from a review of various cases in each class and is indicative of the issues, tax law knowledge and accounting complexities normally encountered by revenue agents at the GS–12 and GS–13 levels.
Determination of industry class for business returns will be made by reference to NAICS codes. Individual and fiduciary returns will be placed in Class 5 (Nonbusiness) unless their primary source of income is from a business. The classes are listed in the table below:
(Manufacturing, Construction and Mining)
Total Assets $250K to $12M Over $12M or Gross Receipts $1M to $15M Over $15M CLASS 2
RETAIL, WHOLESALE AND TRANSPORTATION
Total Assets $1M to $12M Over $12M or Gross Receipts $2M to $33M Over $33M CLASS 3
SERVICES AND FARMING
Gross Receipts $3M to $33M Over $33M CLASS 4
FINANCIAL AND UTILITIES
(Banking, Insurance and Utilities)
Total Assets $0M to $115M Over $115M CLASS 5
NONBUSINESS INDIVIDUAL AND NONBUSINESS FIDUCIARY
Cases under this class are graded as GS–11 unless possessing an upgradable issue as listed in Part IV of this Exhibit. If the primary source of income is from wages/salaries, the case will fall under this class even if a Schedule C or F is attached. If the primary source of income is from a business, the case will fall under one of the other classes.
If a case is graded at a GS–11 level based upon Parts I, II and III, and an upgradable issue appears on the return, the case may be upgraded to a GS–12 after consideration of the facts in the case. These same 13 upgradable issues may cause a case to be upgraded from GS–12 to GS–13. However, the decision to upgrade a case to GS–13 is most often a determination that is based on case size and case complexity. Additionally, a 14th upgradable issue called "Unusual Complexity" is included to allow group managers to upgrade a case based upon features, facts and circumstances encountered during a particular examination.
The following table presents 13 upgradable issues which may cause a case to be upgraded from GS–11 to GS–12 and a 14th category "Unusual Complexity."
Part IV—List of Upgradable Issues that May Result in an Upgrade I. Controlled Group 2. Complex Like Kind Exchange 3. Liquidation/Reorganization 4. Foreign controlled (Exclusive of Significant Specialist Involvement) 5. Valuation issues (Exclusive of Significant Engineering Support) 6. Financial Products. e.g., commodities, straddles, etc. 7. LIFO 8. IRC 263A — Capitalization of Inventory Costs 9. IRC 482 — Allocation of Income/Deductions among two or more trades/business 10. IRC sections 741/742/743, Recognition/Character of Gain/Loss & Basis on Sale of a partnership. 11. Key Case TEFRA 12. Complex Fraud Development 13. Sensitive, High-Profile Taxpayer 14. Unusual Complexity
The first step in applying this guide is to relate the return being assigned or graded to the five classes listed in Part III of these guidelines. All income tax cases will be graded. Classification of business returns in Classes 1 through 4 will be determined by reference to the NAICS code listings. If no NAICS code appears on a return, group managers will determine the proper class based upon a review of the case file. Individual and Fiduciary cases will be placed in Class 5 (Nonbusiness), unless it is more appropriate to place the case in another class. Primary source of income for cases in Class 5 is salaries/wages even though a Schedule C or F may be attached to the return.
During case assignment, a group manager will relate all facts known about a case to Parts I–IV. Part III may be most applicable, particularly the size criteria, such as total assets. Specific issues may not be known until the case is fully examined. However, during final case grading all four parts of the guide must be used, especially the case grading factors in Part I. Size criteria alone must not be relied upon for final case grading because normally other factors influence the difficulty of a case.
When assigning a final grade to a case, a group manager will first make reference to Part I of the guide. A general assessment will be made as to how each factor grades out. Normally, more than one of the major factors is necessary to influence the final grade. Following this process, reference can then be made to Parts II, III, and IV of the guide to determine how the size criteria grades out and whether any upgradable issues are present that might influence the final case grade. The objective is to use these four parts of the guide to make a decision on the difficulty of the case.
See IRM 18.104.22.168.6.5.6, which provides instructions for completing Item 32, grade of case, on Form 5344.
A group manager may use their judgment to change the probable grade of a case before making an assignment. A group manager may suspect that special or complex issues or problems will be encountered in the examination and this is sufficient reason to justify upgrading the probable level of the case. On the other hand, a group manager, in view of the prior agent’s report, etc., may lower the probable grade level of a case on the basis that the scope of the examination will be limited or will only involve continuing and/or recurring issues such as travel and entertainment, repairs, depreciation, etc. These are sufficient reasons to justify assigning a lower grade level to the case.
Special situations that will require judgment in determining case grade are:
Package Examination—Give full credit for developing KEY CASE and all other cases in the package.
Flow-Through/Information Reports (e.g. AIMS control of Related Returns Procedures)—Give full credit if normal range of knowledge and auditing techniques is required to apply a previously identified issue. Give less than full credit if issues have been previously identified and are applied in a mechanical manner with less than normal knowledge requirements.
Subsequent Years—Refer to Flow-Through/Information Reports definition; full credit may be considered if additional issues evolve or are developed in subsequent years requiring a normal range of knowledge and auditing techniques.
Limited Scope—Give less than full credit if examination is so restricted in scope that the normal range of knowledge and auditing techniques is not required. Give full credit for examination of limited scope where normal range of knowledge and auditing techniques is required. (In this situation, the RA usually limits the scope.)
Specialist Involvement—Complexity of the case will include specialist’s involvement; however, final grade will depend on knowledge and auditing techniques required of the RA.
The difficulty of a case cannot be finally determined until the examination is completed. The determinations made prior to examination are not controlling. A group manager’s final determination of the case grade will be made upon completion of the examination. A group manager should note the basis used to downgrade the case within the case file.
This guide does not supersede the existing Office of Personnel Management (OPM) standards for classifying internal RA positions. Rather, the provisions of this guide are consistent with the grade level criteria outlined in the OPM standards for the GS–512 series. However, such position classification factors as supervision and guidance received, cannot be measured by this guide. Such factors are primarily related to the technical skills and knowledge demonstrated by an individual RA. The amount and kind of supervision required by a RA on a continuing basis may affect the grade of a position but not the grade of the cases assigned. Under normal supervision, the grade of an RA’s position depends upon a continuing workload of a wide range of cases at a given grade level.
Revenue agents may be assigned a limited number of cases above their grade level for developmental purposes. The assignment of higher or lower level cases for short periods of time, to provide developmental opportunities, or to meet specific operational needs, does not affect the grade level of an RA’s position. Also, cases assigned at one grade level sometimes become significantly more difficult during the examination process. Such assignments often provide adequate developmental experiences. When developmental or priority assignments above the grade level of an RA are completed under closer than normal supervision, or supervisory instructions limit the scope of the examination, the assignment may be considered to be consistent with the RA’s grade.
A group manager and position classifiers must be aware of the distinctions between the grade levels of positions and grade levels of cases assigned.
A group manager is responsible for assigning cases consistent with a RA’s grade level, keeping developmental assignments within reasonable limits, and periodically apprising a RA of the distinctions between the grades of cases and the grades of their positions.
Position classifiers are responsible for making the final determinations on the grade levels of positions and providing advisory services to a group manager on position management and work assignment practices.
A group manager determines the grade of case for all field examination income tax returns including non-business and business, individual, fiduciary, partnership and all types of corporations, and tax shelter cases. The case grade is entered as a three digit number in item 32 of Form 5344. When a related return is being closed by the same RA who examined the primary return, enter the same three digit code as for the primary return, but followed by an "R" (for related). If related returns are examined by a different RA, each will be graded as a separate case, and the "R" will not be recorded. (See IRM 22.214.171.124.6.5.4, Case Grading for Special Situations for Field Examination Cases, for guidelines on grading cases with special situations).
In Item 32 of Form 5344, the first digit represents the class of return, the second digit represents the grade of the case at closing, and the third digit which will always be a "1" , has not been assigned a use; however, it must be completed to prevent terminal rejects. (Previously, the third digit was used for case upgrading based on complexities found during the examination).
Referring to Parts I, II, III and IV (IRM 126.96.36.199.188.8.131.52 through 4): The first digit on Item 32 of Form 5344 is the class number for the industry, occupation, or type of case that most closely resembles the activity on the examined return. The second digit is the second digit of the closing grade; that is, 1 represents GS–11 and below, 2 represents GS–12, and 3 represents GS–13. All four parts of the Case Guidelines for Determining Grade level of Case are needed to make the final grade determination. A "1" will be entered in the third digit for all cases.
A Form 1065 filed by a taxpayer who raises race horses, has been graded as a GS–12 case by the group manager using all four parts of the Case Assignment and Grading Guide. Item 32 of Form 5344 would be completed as 321 for Class 3 (Services and Farming) and a final grade of GS–12. (remember that the third digit will always be a ‘1 ’). Related returns examined by the same RA who examined the primary return would be coded 321R. Related returns examined by other revenue agents would be coded without the R and graded as a separate case.
Effective inventory management is critical to all three balanced measures. A group manager should:
Guide employee performance;
Improve the effectiveness of audit practices;
Meet procedural requirements;
Maintain an awareness of the status of cases under examination;
Regularly interact with examiners;
Make prompt decisions regarding examination scope;
Facilitate the timely completion of examinations, including discussing the case with the taxpayer or representative to facilitate receipt of requested information if the taxpayer/representative refused to provide it to the examiner; and
Make timely decisions to expand the case to include other years or related taxpayers when applicable.
The starting point of addressing collectibility is conducting a quality audit. Quality Attribute 409 states collectibility should be considered throughout the examination. Examiners' pre-contact responsibility for collectibility potential is described in IRM 4.20.2, Scope Consideration. If collectibility is an issue in an assigned case, a group manager will make the final determination whether to survey the return or to limit the scope/depth of an examination. See IRM 4.20.2 for additional information.
A fundamental philosophy of quality responsiveness to our external customers is that they are entitled to the prompt and proper resolution of their examinations. This philosophy also helps minimize the level of overage work in group inventories. The case file should document reasons for significant periods of inactivity. Refer to IRM Exhibit 4.8.3-1, Quality Attributes, for National Standard Timeframes.
While considering and keeping morale concerns in mind, as well as the relationships between examiners, a group manager should utilize transfers of cases between examiners to ensure continuity of case work. Cases should not be allowed to remain inactive for prolonged periods of time. The case file should clearly document reassignment actions taken.
A group manager should strongly encourage and monitor multi-year and related pickup work. This is a specific area in which a group manager can have a key role in inventory management and one in which the use of time can be directly impacted. Quality Attribute 112 states prior/subsequent and related returns should be considered during the examination.
When approving related pickups, risk analysis should be considered to determine if the time required is worthy of the potential return on the investment.
Requisitions for returns and/or controls should be approved by a group manager after reviewing the examiner's reason for requesting the return.
A group manager should ensure that all examiners obtain approval before initiating an examination of a return previously requested for reference and information purposes (Source Code 45). A photocopy of Form 5345-D will be attached to the tax return as a permanent record.
The group manager is responsible for ensuring that quality examinations are conducted. When a case is closed by an examiner, the group manager should review the case to ensure it is procedurally and technically correct. The scope of the review will vary based on the group manager’s knowledge of the specific examiner’s level of experience and work. At a minimum, the group manager must ensure the examiner:
Reconciled the time on ERCS to Form 5344.
Made the required follow-up attempts to contact the taxpayer if the taxpayer did not respond to the initial contact letter (IRM 184.108.40.206.3, No Response/No Show Procedures).
Considered and documented prior/subsequent year and related returns.
Properly completed and documented the minimum income probes.
Considered, applied and documented assertion and non assertion of penalties when applicable.
Reconciled the tax and taxable income on the examination report to current TXMODA information.
Followed proper procedures to solicit payment if there is an unpaid deficiency and the case is agreed.
The goal is to forward a closed case as quickly as practical and in accordance with the National Standard Timeframes. See IRM 220.127.116.11.4, Time Frames in Closing a Case from the Group, and IRM Exhibit 4.8.3-1, Quality Attributes, for additional guidance.
If a procedural or technical deficiency is noted, the case should be returned to the examiner for correction. The group manager should consider sharing the observation with the examiner as formal documentation.
Technical Services may return a case to a group for further development if the case meets the criteria in IRM 18.104.22.168.1, Case Return Criteria. Form 3990, Reviewers Report, is generally used to communicate between Technical Services and a group regarding reviewed cases.
Technical Services' communication (e.g., Form 3990) should be given prompt and appropriate attention. In most instances, the case should be returned to Technical Services within 60 days of receipt in the group. If there is disagreement with the findings of Technical Services, the group manager should discuss the matter with the Technical Services group manager.
The group manager must emphasize to examiners the need to solicit payment in both fully and partially agreed examinations. See IRM 4.20.3, Soliciting Payment, for guidelines for using the tiered interview approach for soliciting payment, securing levy source information, and coordinating with Collection.
An examiner will not solicit payment from a taxpayer until the examination is complete. If an agreement is secured and the taxpayer offers payment prior to closing as a means of stopping the accrual of interest, such payment will be accepted and processed as an advance payment on deficiency. See IRM 22.214.171.124, Payment Received Prior to Issuance of Notice of Deficiency.
If no agreement is secured and the taxpayer wants to make a remittance prior to closing as a means of stopping the accrual of interest, such remittance will be accepted. Prior to processing the remittance the examiner must determine whether it's a payment of tax or an IRC 6603 deposit. See IRM 126.96.36.199.1, Is The Remittance a Payment of Tax or a IRC Section 6603 Deposit? In addition, see Rev. Proc. 2005–18, which provides procedures for taxpayers to make, withdraw, or identify deposits to suspend the running of interest on potential underpayments under IRC 6603.
The group manager must ensure that employees timely transmit remittances to the designated Submission Processing Center shown on the SB/SE Examination website at http://mysbse.web.irs.gov/exam/tip/paymntprocessing/default.aspx within 24 hours. Payments over $100,000 require special attention. See IRM 188.8.131.52, Payments of $100,000 or More.
Agreed unpaid deficiencies or overassessments in excess of $100,000 should close from the group within four calendar days of receipt of the report or waiver. See IRM 184.108.40.206, Processing Agreed and Unpaid Deficiencies, for additional processing instructions.
"Large dollar" cases require special processing. See IRM 4.4.18, Large Dollar Cases, for definitions and processing instructions.
In addition to the steps in IRM 220.127.116.11.11 paragraph (1) group managers should review the closed case to ensure:
The examiner has prepared the appropriate closing letter(s). The group manager must sign the closing letter before closing the case to CCP. See IRM 18.104.22.168, No Change and No Liability Cases.
The examiner has followed the procedures in IRM 22.214.171.124.3, No Change Report with Adjustments Impacting Other Tax Year(s) Filed, Delinquent or Not Due, when applicable
In addition to the steps in IRM 126.96.36.199.11 paragraph (1) group managers should review the closed case to ensure:
The examiner has prepared the appropriate closing letter(s). The group manager must sign the closing letter before closing the case to CCP. See IRM 188.8.131.52.7, Closing Letters for Agreed Cases.
Penalties have been considered and applied when applicable and managerial approval has been documented under IRC 6751(b). See IRM 184.108.40.206.4, Managerial Approval of Penalties, for additional guidance.
The taxpayer(s) has signed the report.
The examiner has date stamped the report.
A group manager should encourage examiners to request partial agreements and solicit advance payment. See IRM 220.127.116.11, Partially Agreed Cases, for additional processing instructions.
After the partial agreement is processed, the completed case is closed as unagreed.
It is in the Service's best interest to resolve tax controversies at the lowest possible level. A group manager and examiner are empowered to consider all the facts and taxpayer documentation provided. In addition, materiality and collectibility should be considered in resolving cases.
Examiners must inform their group manager when they believe a case will have unagreed issues (except no show/no response cases). The reason for the case being unagreed should be clearly communicated to the manager.
Unless specifically excluded from Appeals consideration, all cases are eligible to be forwarded to Appeals as long as the taxpayer submits an adequate small case request or formal written protest that includes the information required in Pub 5, Your Appeal Rights and How to Prepare a Protest If You Don’t Agree. The following are specifically excluded from Appeals consideration:
Fewer than 365 days remain on the statute of limitations when the case is received in Appeals (180 days if Appeals previously released jurisdiction of the case and returned it to Examination for additional work). See IRM 18.104.22.168, Receipt of New Assignment by an Appeals Technical Employee (ATE).
Examiners should issue a 30-day letter with a minimum of 240 days remaining on the statute of limitations to start the 30-day time period in the event the taxpayer signs a consent. If there are fewer than 240 days remaining on the statute of limitations, examiners should issue Letter 5153, Examination Report Transmittal - Statute >240 Days (Straight Deficiency) (or similar letter depending on the type of closure), to transmit the report and notify the taxpayer additional time is needed for Appeals to consider their case if it is unagreed. See IRM 22.214.171.124.1, 30-Day Letters.
Request/claim for abatement of unpaid tax that is not an audit reconsideration, See IRM 126.96.36.199(6), Claims for Abatement, Audit Reconsiderations, and Supplemental Reports
Taxpayer disagrees solely on moral, religious, political, constitutional, conscientious, or similar grounds. See IRM 188.8.131.52.1, No Appeals Conference or Concession on Certain Arguments.
Fraud cases involving pending criminal prosecution. See IRM 184.108.40.206, Returning a Case to Examination – ATE.
The group manager must review an unagreed case file and return it to the examiner if:
The issues are not adequately developed. A fully developed case should contain an easy to follow audit trail and the evidence needed to support the adjustments proposed in the examination report. At a minimum, the workpapers should:
- Address the facts, law and argument for each issue
- Indicate that any court cases cited by the taxpayer were reviewed
- Clearly reflect the dollar-amounts allowed and disallowed
- Contain an alternative position, if applicable
The case is being closed to Appeals and the protest is not adequate.
The group manager's actions must be documented on Form 9984, Examining Officer's Activity Record, or its RGS equivalent.
) RA group managers are required to make contact in person or by telephone with taxpayers and/or representatives on all unagreed cases to attempt to resolve the tax controversies in order to reach an agreement. If agreement cannot be reached, Fast Track Settlement (FTS) should be offered, if applicable. FTS should not be offered if the group manager has not spoken to the taxpayer and/or representative. See IRM 220.127.116.11.5, SB/SE Fast Track Settlement, for additional information.
If the issues cannot be resolved, a conference is not desired, or FTS is not initiated, the group manager will return the case to the examiner for preparation of a 30-day letter and report.
The group manager must review the unagreed report for accuracy and sign the 30-day letter prior to the issuance of the unagreed report to the taxpayer and/or representative.
When a taxpayer has requested their case be sent to Appeals, TCO group managers are required to make contact in person or by telephone with the taxpayer and/or representative to conduct a group manager’s conference and attempt to resolve the tax controversies in order to reach an agreement. If agreement cannot be reached, FTS should be offered, if applicable. FTS should not be offered if the group manager has not spoken to the taxpayer and/or representative. See IRM 18.104.22.168.5, SB/SE Fast Track Settlement, for additional information.
If the issues cannot be resolved, a conference is not desired, or FTS is not initiated, the group manager will forward the case to Appeals.
The group manager must avoid having short statute cases in group inventory. See IRM 22.214.171.124.3, Statute Controls, for guidance.
Returns with 180 days or less remaining on the statute of limitations must be placed in a red folder. This folder will flag the case until it is closed by CCP.
The data for management information reports and tables is derived from the AIMS database. The Tennessee Computing Center produces tables for each area, territory, group and campus examination functions. The data are transmitted monthly to the Detroit Computing Center for additional report generation.
ERCS reports are generated at the group level and are used to monitor case statutes, progress, and status. The group, territory, and Area can generate reports from ERCS. See IRM 126.96.36.199.6, ERCS Reports, for more detailed discussion.
A group manager should consult with their territory manager regarding the monitoring tools they are required to use and the frequency for using such tools. Some monitoring tools are optional and others have required use. For example, AIMS Table 4.1 must be worked within 5 days of receipt of the e-mail in the group manager's inbox.
Table 36, Examination Program Monitoring, provides all levels of management concise analytical information for use in managing the Examination function. The table provides data from AIMS which is used to monitor examinations, inventory, surveyed returns, and accepted returns from classification.
Table 36 shows a group’s accomplishments for the current fiscal year excluding dollar accomplishments. These accomplishments are divided between training and non-training returns. Data is categorized by type of returns such as individual, corporate, partnership, and claims. Table 36 shows cases in Status 10 through Status 90 and contains the following:
Inventory aging information
Current month closures
Hours per return
Total claims closed
Returns started in current month
Mix of returns
This information is grouped into the following categories:
When analyzing Table 36, it is important to look behind the numbers. The statistics provided by this table provide trends. To understand the trends identified:
High hours per return may reflect the group is pursuing issues which do not warrant the time being expended. Ineffective planning and scheduling practices or poor examination techniques contribute to higher time on cases.
Table 36 also provides the number of prior year returns assigned to the group. By monitoring the "returns beyond cycle" columns, a group manager can adjust the inventory mix to meet the examination cycle and prior year guidelines.
Fraud, joint committee, and other cases are excluded and are categorized on Table 36 as "returns with exclusions."
The differentiation "with or without exclusions" is determined based on source code, status code and project code information. This highlights one important aspect of proper code utilization.
Review the "no time applied" and "program monitoring" columns to monitor priority returns in unopened status.
"Aging time applied" categorizes a group's inventory by months in-process (status 12). Cases "over 12" months should be a relatively small portion of a group's inventory and require the immediate attention of a group manager. An excessive number of cases in either the "6–9" month or "10–12" month category is an indicator of a potential future problem. Consider conducting in-process case reviews when cases are 4–6 months of age with the emphasis on completion of these cases. This will assist in reducing the percentage of overage cases.
When claims are identified in the "Claims on Hand" column, consult Table 8.1 to identify claims which require prompt attention.
There are additional uses for Table 36. A group manager should consult the territory manager on a regular basis to determine monitoring priorities.
Table 4.1 is one of the most urgent of the AIMS tables. It must be worked within five days of receipt of the e-mail in the group manager's inbox. It must be dated and initialed by a group manager and a support staff member upon completion. Table 4.1 is a monthly report which lists returns in status codes 05, 06, 08-19, with statute dates that (according to AIMS) have expired or will expire within 180 days.
The PCS also generates a similar statute control report (PCS Report 4–1).
The ultimate responsibility for statute protection rests with a group manager. Accordingly, the Table 4.1 should be reviewed carefully to ensure that all prior year returns are properly accounted for on AIMS. IRM 188.8.131.52.1.1, Procedures for Working Statute Control Report, provides the necessary steps required to work this table. Also see IRM 184.108.40.206.9, AIMS Tables 4.1 and SC 4.0.
A description of other AIMS Tables may be found in IRM 4.4.27, Reports.
The Examination Quality Measurement Staff (EQMS) reviews a statistically valid area level sample of closed SB/SE cases against the quality attributes. NQRS is a parallel system to EQRS and is used to collect data from EQMS reviews. NQRS data is used to provide quality scores for field and office examination that are included as a component of the Business Results measurement.
The EQMS is responsible for providing quarterly reports of quality results at the area and national levels. NQRS provides various standard reports that can be accessed by users at the area, territory and group levels; however, data is not available below the territory level. Territory data is not statistically valid, but may be used as indicators in quality improvement efforts. Reports and data should be generated using 12-month periods in order to provide the best comparative analysis. NQRS trends and corrective measures requiring attention will generally be covered at territory meetings. Inquiries involving NQRS quality data/interpretation and requests for presentations should be made by the territory manager to the EQMS program manager.
NQRS reports are additional tools to assist a group manager in the development of examiners and in the accomplishment of quality examinations. A group manager should involve examiners in identifying improvement opportunities for attributes that necessitate corrective action. This is a good forum for sharing expertise and experience among all examiners in a group.
Group managers can secure current NQRS reports for their territory and Area from NQRS. Password requests to access the system should be submitted using an Online 5081, Automated Information System (AIS) User Registration/Change Request. Instructions for requesting passwords and information on reports are available on the Embedded Quality page at http://mysbse.web.irs.gov/examination/examinationeq/default.aspx.
EQRS reports can be generated at the group level. EQRS provides a group manager the ability to generate reports on the results of the reviews that have been entered into the system. These reports can be used to:
Share the results of individual reviews with employees;
Compile the results of multiple reviews during a rating period for use when preparing an employee's mid-year review or annual performance appraisal provided that the reviews have been shared timely with the employee;
Identify the top-scoring and bottom-scoring quality attributes within your group; and
Compare the group results to territory, Area and National NQRS results.
Partnership Control System Reports — PCS has a variety of reports available for use by Campus personnel, Area coordinators, and field groups. Refer to IRM 4.29.4, PCS Reports, for a list of the reports.
Report 4–4, TEFRA One-Year Assessment Statute Date List — Lists all records on the PCS with a TEFRA one-year assessment date on the investor record. Key case information for linkage records are reflected on the report.
It would be rare for an SB/SE group to have a TEFRA investor return in the group. Generally, investors worked in the group for non-TEFRA issues are routed to the Campus CTF after a partial assessment. The RA should coordinate closure with the Technical Services TEFRA coordinator if the RA issues a RAR for both the non-TEFRA and TEFRA issues so PCS controls can be removed before closure at the terminal.
IRM 4.7.6, Reports, provides information on all ERCS reports and their uses. The reports a group manager will generally use at the group level are listed below. See IRM 4.7.6 for additional reports.
Statute Expiration Reports — IRM 220.127.116.11.
Pending Statute Report — IRM 18.104.22.168.3
895 Report — IRM 22.214.171.124.1
Examination Returns Control System (ERCS), Statute of Limitations - IRM 4.7.3
Inventory Reports — IRM 126.96.36.199.
Overage Report (IVL) — IRM 188.8.131.52.7
Status Report — IRM 184.108.40.206.10
Unassigned Inventory Report — IRM 220.127.116.11.15 and Unassigned Inventory by TSC — IRM 18.104.22.168.14
Overage Requisition Report — IRM 22.214.171.124.8
Alpha IVL (Inventory Validation Listing) — IRM 126.96.36.199.2
Agent Analysis (4502) — IRM 188.8.131.52.1
Closed Case Report — IRM 184.108.40.206.4
In Transit Status Report — IRM 220.127.116.11.5
Time Analysis Reports — IRM 18.104.22.168.
High Time Report — IRM 22.214.171.124.6
Case Time Analysis — IRM 126.96.36.199.2
DET/Non-DET Analysis — IRM 188.8.131.52.5
Inactive Case Report — IRM 184.108.40.206.7
Daily Time Report — IRM 220.127.116.11.4
Status 12 with No Time Applied Report —IRM 18.104.22.168.8
Monitoring Reports — IRM 22.214.171.124.
Prior Year Report — IRM 126.96.36.199.4
Previously Closed Returns — IRM 188.8.131.52.3
Fraud Report — IRM 184.108.40.206.1
Returns by Source Code — IRM 220.127.116.11.7
Returns by Activity Code — IRM 18.104.22.168.5
Returns by Project Code — IRM 22.214.171.124.6
Work Awaiting Approval — IRM 126.96.36.199.10
Returns Related to a Specific Return Report — IRM 188.8.131.52.8
Activity Code Count Report — IRM 184.108.40.206.1. The Activity Code Count Report provides a count of all cases in an AAC by employee and activity code. This report also counts cases in status 10 and 12.
Inventory Validation Listing (IVL) — Annually, each group performs a complete inventory validation retrieved from the statistical sample inventory validation system (SSIVL). The validation involves verifying the physical presence of returns and all AIMS data on all returns shown on the Inventory Validation Listing. IRM 4.4.16, Inventory Control, provides time frames and instructions for performing this validation.
AIMS Weekly Update Report — This report will be generated only when a change occurs at Master File that affects a case in a group. The report informs a group of a change which has occurred on the taxpayer’s account or other information which a group needs to know. The report will reflect changes such as the filing of an amended return or a change in the taxpayer’s address. A description of this report, with instructions, appears at IRM 220.127.116.11.7, AIMS Weekly Update Reports.
424 Reject Register — This report is distributed weekly to all examination groups which are affected. The report informs a group manager that a request to establish a database and/or secure a return Transaction Code (TC) 424 has not been accepted at master file. It provides a code which explains why the account rejected. A taxpayer’s account appearing on the register will require follow-up, correction, monitoring, and/or re-input of the requisition.
Statute Date Override Report — Lists returns when statute dates on ERCS and AIMS are different and ERCS has been changed to reflect the statute date on AIMS. For example, when the return was requested through ERCS, the normal statute date was generated. When the requisition became fully established on AIMS, the statute date reflected a late-filed return. ERCS is corrected to reflect the AIMS statute date.
Unexplained Update Report — During the weekly comparison, the AIMS values for project codes, source codes, status codes, activity codes, aging reasons, claim amounts, and POD codes are compared to the ERCS values. If ERCS is updated from the information on AIMS, this report is generated. Special attention should be given to status code changes.
Dropped AIMS Record Report — Lists records open on ERCS but reflecting no data on AIMS. The report is distributed to the group and must be worked. The report should be compared with AIMS and action taken to resolve the discrepancy.
AAC Difference Report — The AAC Difference Report (ADIF) lists returns for which the AIMS and ERCS AAC’s differ and there are no pending updates or flags in the ERCS database to explain the difference. This report should be printed and worked weekly after the AM7109 file has been processed.
A group manager plays a vital role in accomplishing the mission of the Service. It is essential that all levels of management identify and prioritize expectations.
A group manager develops the expectations for the group in conjunction with the territory manager. The territory manager will share the Area business plan, emphasizing the relationship of the Area business plan to the Balanced Measurement System and individual commitments. A group manager and territory manager will jointly identify opportunities, agree on goals, develop plans and jointly reach commitments on those plans. These expectations should include the performance management objectives in a group manager's Managerial Performance Plan. These expectations must come within the provisions of section 1204 of the Restructuring and Reform Act of 1998 (RRA 98).
PMS is the appraisal system used to evaluate Service non-bargaining unit employees. It consists of an ongoing process of setting expectations, monitoring, evaluating and recognizing performance. The Service's performance management system is designed to strengthen the linkages between performance management and the Service's mission, strategic business goals, business plans and the Balanced Measurement System.
The performance agreement for a group manager consists of:
Responsibilities – representing the core values of the Service, what is important to us as an organization and common to all executives, managers and management officials
Commitments – distinct actions/desired results to be achieved during the performance period
Summary Evaluation – balances the Retention Standard, Responsibilities and Commitments to determine the final rating
Objectives establish specific expectations for each group manager. They provide the basis for monitoring work, providing feedback on progress and recognizing accomplishments. A group manager's success in executing programs and implementing Service policies is reflected in their achievement of PMS objectives.
Feedback on the progress toward these goals based on a group manager's actions and activities during the year will be obtained through the following:
Year-end PMS appraisal
Refer to the Human Capital Office IRS Leadership Competencies website located at http://e-learning.web.irs.gov/fourcomp/index.html for a listing of core responsibilities and leadership competencies for group managers.
A group manager is expected to prepare a self-assessment. For guidance visit the Human Capital Office, Performance Management website http://hco.web.irs.gov/pdf/writingselfassmnts.pdf.
FMFIA was implemented by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Circular A–123, Management Accountability and Control. Its purpose is to safeguard assets and to provide for compliance with the law. Refer to Resource Guide for Managers, IRM 1.4.2, Monitoring and Improving Internal Control, for a detailed explanation.
A group manager's relationship with the territory manager is very important. The first step in establishing this relationship is to understand the territory manager’s expectations. A discussion with the territory manager regarding Operating Division, Area, and territory goals and the assessment of the current condition of the group is the best starting point.
Open lines of communication are very important. A group manager should keep both the territory manager and the group informed of significant matters. Priorities during the year will change and the territory manager expects a group manager to be flexible. At the same time, a group manager should let the territory manager know the impact of shifting priorities on resources and programs. A group manager is expected to be a team player. This may result in sacrificing group goals to meet broader organization goals.
After a group manager prepares expectations, ensure each is understood and strive to accomplish the expectations. Ensure that the provisions of IRM 1.5, Managing Statistics in a Balanced Measurement System, and section 1204 of the Restructuring and Reform Act of 1998 are met when setting expectations for the group or agreeing to those set at a higher level.
IRM 1.5 provides guidance in using enforcement statistics. A group manager's expectations and evaluation of an examiner's performance must not be based on enforcement statistics. For example, a group manager should be concerned about the group’s no change rate. However, a group manager cannot establish a numeric goal/percentage for the no-change rate for examiners. Each examiner’s work and inventory needs to be assessed on its own merits.
Communicating a group manager's expectations and procedures to employees is very important. The high-level definitions of the critical job elements are the same across all IRS occupations. The elements are:
Employee Satisfaction–Employee Contribution
All of a group manager's employees have predetermined critical job elements and expectations are linked to these elements. For example:
Element — Employee Satisfaction–Employee Contribution: an employee willingly helps other employees in the group to resolve a problem and shares knowledge with the group.
Element — Customer Satisfaction–Knowledge: an employee identified a potential hardship on a refund hold and made a decision that the issue did not meet hardship criteria; an employee demonstrated knowledge to deal with the unanticipated situation and applied knowledge of IRS procedures and research materials to make the correct decision.
A group manager should establish his/herself as the leader, but at the same time maintain an atmosphere of flexibility. Encourage employee engagement and discuss their ideas in an open forum. Once a decision is made, solicit mutual agreement and ensure understanding on the direction to be taken.
New procedures and programs will require implementation. As the team leader, it is a group manager's responsibility to communicate any new practices to employees in a positive manner, using a partnership approach. The success of new procedures and programs rests on a group manager's ability to share and implement them in a positive manner. Remember, it is a group manager's responsibility to keep the morale of the group high by taking positive actions toward group activities and operations.
Through open communication, a group manager has the best chance of gaining the group’s commitment to the organization’s goals and expectations. As a group manager prepares to set and communicate the expectations for the group, they should remember the style and methods of communication used by former supervisors. A group manager should use the effective communication methods used by others as a model. To be successful a group manager should be prepared to do the following:
Share the area/territory goals;
Share group expectations;
Ensure employee understanding;
Encourage employee input; and
Solicit employee support.
Remember, realistic, challenging goals should motivate and encourage a high level of performance by group employees. A group manager sets the tone for the group.
Once a group manager has established and communicated expectations to employees, monitoring systems should be established to assess progress. Achievements and accomplishments require planning, execution, and monitoring. Depending on what area a group manager is monitoring, feedback may be specific, written, or informal. Some key areas a group manager will monitor are: direct exam time, overage inventory, quality, and statutes. Occasionally, review the monitoring system to determine if it requires revision based on changing priorities and needs.
After expectations have been established, shared, and a monitoring system is in place, establish follow-up procedures. The formality and structure of follow-up procedures will depend on the area involved.
A group manager is responsible for guiding the activities of the group and evaluating employees. There are a number of management tools available. They include but are not limited to the following:
Group manager concurrence meeting (Field Exam only)
In-process case reviews
Completed case reviews
Technical time report reviews
Information obtained through the above reviews and visits must conform to the requirements of Document 11678, 2016 National Agreement - Internal Revenue Service (IRS) and National Treasury Employees Union (NTEU).
The formal mechanism for providing written feedback about an employee’s accomplishments is Form 6850-BU, Bargaining Unit Performance Appraisal and Recognition Request, or Form 6850 NBU, Non-Bargaining Unit Performance Appraisal. The performance appraisal serves as a:
Record of performance;
Basis to provide further training;
Tool to improve performance;
Document for personnel actions; and
Rating of Record.
Under the performance evaluation system, the first year of employment serves as a probationary period. During this time, each employee must demonstrate fully successful performance. This requires a group manager to closely monitor and review a probationary employee’s work.
A group manager's evaluation of employee performance must conform to procedures detailed in the IRM and Document 11678, 2016 National Agreement - Internal Revenue Service (IRS) and National Treasury Employees Union (NTEU).
Policies of the Service must be adhered to when evaluating performance. These policies prohibit the use of predetermined quantitative standards, enforcement results, or quotas to influence the evaluation of an examiner’s performance. See IRM 1.5, Managing Statistics in a Balanced Measurement System and section 1204 of RRA 1998. A group manager may look to the territory manager, Labor Relations, and Human Resources for additional direction and guidance.
An efficient and effective employee appraisal depends on a group manager's active involvement and timely direction. Fair and balanced feedback is essential to maintain and improve skills.
Keep an employee’s overall performance in mind when a group manager discusses work and related activities. Timely inform an employee when some aspect of performance may negatively influence the next performance rating. Verbal notification must be followed by written documentation. A recordation is defined as a group manager’s written record evaluating an employee in a positive or negative manner. Recordation must be shared with bargaining unit employees within 15 work days of the time the group manager becomes aware, or should have been aware, of the event which it addresses. Document 11678, 2016 National Agreement - Internal Revenue Service (IRS) and National Treasury Employees Union (NTEU), Article 12, Section 9.
A group manager's role as an instructor and evaluator is to assess the quality of the employee’s work and provide timely feedback and guidance. By maintaining documentation throughout the rating period, sufficient information will be available to prepare the annual appraisal. Remember that performance appraisals are used to give employees official feedback and need to be clearly and timely communicated. Refer to IRM 6.430.2, Performance Management Program for Evaluating Bargaining Unit and Non-Bargaining Unit Employees Assigned to Critical Job Elements (CJEs), for additional information
Employee recognition is designed to reward and recognize employees, either individually or as a member of a team or group, for their performance, adopted suggestion ideas, or other exemplary contributions to the Service's mission. Employee recognition may include monetary awards, time-off awards, honorary recognition (e.g., plaques, certificates, etc.), informal recognition items, or a combination. Listed below are some forms of recognition:
Performance Awards–See IRM 6.451, Employee Performance and Utilization
Quality Step Increase–See IRM 6.451.1.21
Special Act or Service Awards–See IRM 6.451.1.10
Manager's Awards–See IRM 6.451.1.11
Time-Off Awards–See IRM 6.451.1.14
Bilingual Awards–See IRM 6.451.1.12
Suggestion Awards–See IRM 6.451.1.13
Secretary of the Treasury Honor Awards Program–See IRM 6.451.1.17, e.g., Commissioner's Award, IRS Career Service Recognition Program, and Certificates of Recognition
Albert Gallatin Award–See IRM 6.451.1.18.
For additional information on awards visit the Human Capital Office website located at http://hco.web.irs.gov/perfmgmt/awards/perfaward/awardindex.html.
An EPF is a record of performance-related data maintained on an employee. EPFs must be established and maintained for all full-time, part-time, seasonal, intermittent, term and temporary employees expected to be employed at least 120 days in a calendar year.
An EPF is a required file for each employee. A group manager is responsible for maintaining and assuring effective use of the EPF system by:
Securing performance records/documents
Forwarding EPFs to the new group manager upon transfer or reassignment
Each EPF must be clearly labeled as "Employee Performance File" , along with the employee's name and last four digits of their social security number, or, as an alternative, their SEID. Access to an EPF is limited to the employee, management officials with a need to know, and any representative designated by the employee, such as NTEU. EPFs should be kept in a locked cabinet, room, or other secured area.
Information to be retained in the EPF includes:
Performance plan (critical elements and standards);
Form 6774, Receipt of Critical Job Elements and Retention Standard;
Annual appraisals, departure appraisals and ratings;
Any records of performance documentation such as workload reviews, case file reviews, job visitations, progress reviews, mid-year assessments and all appraisal forms, such as Form 6850, needed to justify a personnel action (e.g., promotion, award, furlough, or removal);
Records of performance counseling;
Rebuttal statements submitted by the employee;
Career Learning Plan;
Student employment work agreement;
No documentation related to disciplinary or adverse action will be placed in an EPF unless such action was based on performance.
All EPFs should be purged annually to remove documentation over four years old.
If an employee leaves the Service, the EPF is sent to the servicing Transactional Processing Center (TPC). Contact the Area Labor Relations Office to identify the specific items that should not be sent to the TPC. Additional information can be accessed at https://portal.ds.irsnet.gov/sites/iManage/HT/Lists/Topics/Item/displayifs.aspx?List=559a6e43%2D7344%2D419b%2D834d%2Dc69db44277b3&ID=50&Web=f636bbe6%2D37d3%2D4bfa%2D8500%2Ddf748d1f61aa.
Documents related to an employee's conduct, such as failure to file taxes, tardiness, or leave abuse, may be filed in a "drop" file which will be kept separate from the EPF. Documents should be sanitized for any items the maintenance of which is not consistent with the underlying purpose of keeping the record or in violation of federal law or regulations (e.g., date of birth).
Additional information on EPFs can be found in:
Document 11678, 2016 National Agreement - Internal Revenue Service (IRS) and National Treasury Employees Union (NTEU), Article 7; and
5 CFR 293, Subpart D;
IRM 6.430.2, Performance Management Program for Evaluating Bargaining Unit and Non-Bargaining Unit Employees Assigned to Critical Job Elements (CJEs).
The GMCM is an opportunity for the group manager and RA to discuss the scope and depth of the examination, as well as the mutual commitment date (MCD). Group manager involvement in the early stages of an examination results in fewer delays, increased efficiency and higher quality cases.
The GMCM should occur within 30 business days following the completion of the initial appointment. The GMCM may also be conducted prior to the initial appointment, for example, when the taxpayer or representative is procrastinating and has rescheduled the initial appointment multiple times.
The RA should schedule the GMCM meeting as soon as the date of the initial appointment is scheduled.
GS-12 revenue agents and below are required to use the GMCM.
GS-13 revenue agents are encouraged to utilize a GMCM in order to provide updates on cases and obtain guidance from managers.
At a minimum, the RA should be prepared to discuss:
The initial appointment meeting and MCD;
Accomplishments and planned actions for completing the case;
Issues currently identified;
Required filing checks;
Location of the audit work; and
Concerns or barriers to closing the case.
The GMCM should be documented on the GMCM lead sheet (#115).
The GMCM can be evaluative or non-evaluative. If the GMCM is evaluative, the manager should consider rating the following EQRS quality attributes:
Attribute 100, Protection of Statute of Limitations
Attribute 101, Pre-Plan Activity
Attribute 111 - LUQ After Pre-Plan (Other than Income)
Attribute 112, Required Filing Checks
Attribute 114, IDR (Information Document Request)
Attribute 300, Exam Income Determination
Attribute 405, Interpreted/Applied Tax Law Correctly
Attribute 440, Audit/Compliance Interview
Attribute 502, Workload Management
Attribute 509, Time Charged
Attribute 510, Time Span
Attribute 707, Workpapers Support Conclusions
This list is not meant to be all-inclusive, but rather to provide a starting point for a GMCM evaluative review. The group manager should use their judgment to determine which quality attributes are most applicable. Refer to Document 12354, Field Compliance Embedded Quality, Field and Office Examination Job Aid, for points to consider.
An in-process case review is an opportunity for a group manager to be involved in an examination while the case is ongoing. The involvement may be extensive or may be limited to a very specific part of the examination. Some areas a group manager may wish to consider are:
Determining overall examination abilities;
Training in a new or unique issue;
Developing accounting and/or auditing skills;
Observing communication skills;
Assisting in the proper development of technical issues;
Determining and/or improving proper time utilization;
Reviewing and/or improving workpaper documentation;
Determining scope and depth of examinations;
Improving your knowledge of certain industries and/or issues;
Observing interview techniques and offering constructive feedback; and
Providing assistance with overage cases
Completion of in-process reviews should be annotated in the case file on Form 9984, Examining Officer’s Activity Record.
Listed below are a few of the EQRS quality attributes that lend themselves to being rated in an in-process case review. This list is not meant to be all-inclusive, but rather to assist a group manager in this particular type of case review. A group manager should use their own judgment to determine which quality attributes are most applicable for a specific review.
Attribute 101, Pre-Plan Activity - Were the pre-plan activities appropriate for the case?
Attribute 300, Exam Income Determination- Were the minimum tests performed?
Attribute 440, Audit/Compliance Interview - Were interviews effective and information obtained to understand the taxpayer/business operations?
Attribute 405, Interpreted/Applied Tax Law Correctly - Were the proper techniques used, issues properly developed and tax law applied correctly?
Attribute 408, Civil Penalty Determination - Was the assertion or non-assertion of penalties correctly considered, computed and documented?
Workload reviews will give a group manager the best overall picture of each examiner’s work and activities. A good understanding of the employee's work is necessary for evaluating performance, providing direction, and deciding when a group manager should become more involved in specific examinations.
Workload reviews should foster open and honest interaction between a group manager and employees; therefore, it is essential that a group manager discuss areas where there is above-average performance as well as areas that require improvement. Agreed actions and directions provided during the review should be noted in the workload review documentation and a comment placed on Form 9984, Examining Officer’s Activity Record, that the case was reviewed as part of a workload review.
Workload reviews should be timely summarized in writing, addressing the quality attributes and as many of the job elements as practical. The workload review feedback should be timely discussed with the employee in person. The meeting to discuss the workload review should occur within the first few days after the review is completed to achieve the most value.
Workload reviews are valuable management tools; therefore, timely follow-up to determine if the agreed-upon actions have been completed is very important.
Listed below are a few of the EQRS quality attributes that lend themselves to being rated in a workload review. This list is not meant to be all-inclusive, but rather to assist a group manager in this particular type of case review. A group manager should use their own judgment to determine which quality attributes are most applicable for a specific review.
Attribute 408, Civil Penalty Determination - Was the assertion or non-assertion of penalties correctly considered, computed and documented in the workpapers?
Attribute 510, Time Span - Were timely actions taken?
Attribute 502, Workload Management - Was work appropriately and logically planned through the use of a planning calendar? Were appointments and follow-up work appropriately scheduled? Was work appropriately prioritized?
Attribute 707, Workpapers Support Conclusions - Was there a clear audit trail? Were techniques and conclusions documented in the workpapers? Were relevant workpapers included in the file?
Begin the workload review by securing a list of all returns assigned to the examiner. With ERCS, the inventory list can be sorted by several different categories, including but not limited to priorities, status codes, days in process, and activity codes. The review can be limited to priority work and overage cases, or a complete review of the examiner's inventory including status 10 work. See also IRM 18.104.22.168.6, ERCS Reports, of this chapter for a list of reports that may be useful when conducting workload reviews.
All cases assigned to the examiner should be available and matched against the 100% IVL listing during the workload review. Inspecting all cases available will identify "copies of returns" and years which are being worked but are not controlled on ERCS/AIMS. It will also identify potential "missing" or reassigned returns where the ERCS controls were never properly reassigned or closed.
Items to address during a workload include but are not limited to the following:
Adequacy of inventory;
Cases in process for extended periods of time;
Status 10 inventory;
Workload problems and delays;
Compatibility of work with employee's grade;
Use of time; and
The employee’s total inventory should be reviewed to determine if the employee has a good balance of work in process.
A determination should be made as to whether inventory is balanced among cases in opening, active, and closing stages of the examination.
The complexity of the cases in process should be considered.
The total amount of priority work assigned to the employee and the time required for timely completion should be considered.
The group manager should review priority work areas including but not limited to: short statute cases, audit reconsiderations, reviewer's reports, request for information, collateral investigations, claims, informant claims for rewards, inadequate records, refund hold, and overage cases.
A group manager should:
Determine if priority work has been identified and scheduled.
Determine if the highest priority work has been scheduled first.
Determine when priority status 10 work can be started or if it should be reassigned or closed by survey.
Determine if any barriers to closing exist for started inventory.
A group manager should review cases in process for extended periods of time to:
Determine if delays result from taxpayer relations, follow-up procedures, examination planning, or examination techniques.
Determine if the employee has a pattern of keeping cases in process for excessive periods of time.
Determine if the employee is experiencing difficulty recognizing and developing issues.
The cases that are not in process should be reviewed to:
Determine if returns with the most potential are worked first.
Determine if the employee initiates examinations or appropriately surveys returns.
Determine if managerial approval should be required prior to the employee starting new cases.
Determine if any case should be reassigned.
The cases that are in process should be reviewed to:
Determine the progress of each case.
Determine if the pre-examination plan is effective.
Determine if risk analysis was conducted by the employee during the planning process (Field Examination only).
Determine if mutual commitment dates are secured on cases in process with the taxpayer or representative (Field Examination only).
Determine if the examiner's time charges exceed guidelines (preplan, interview, or closing activities) without managerial approval (Office Examination only.)
Determine if the examination was conducted in a logical manner and appropriate examination techniques were used.
Determine if fraud indicators were recognized and properly considered.
Pinpoint specific actions which should be taken to improve the status of the examination and/or an employee’s work performance. These actions include:
Prevent frequent cancellation of appointments by taxpayer or representative and suggest new approaches for scheduling appointments
Correct deficiencies in pre-audit examination plans to eliminate substantial deviation
Address any delays in securing records
Curtail repeated contacts for piecemeal information;
Address any taxpayer complaints regarding requests for information;
Point out valid objections by the taxpayer which the employee has failed to consider;
Address any problems and delays in the development of facts:
Diversionary tactics by taxpayers and representatives to impede case development;
Excessive time spent to develop facts, and research issues; and
Complaints by the examiner concerning unreasonable taxpayers or representatives;
Address any problems and delays in the development of issues:
Lack of ability to recognize issues;
Lack of ability to develop issues; and
Lack of ability to use indirect methods or other examination techniques;
Set target dates for completion of specific actions;
Resolve unwarranted case closing delays;
Require follow-up on unanswered requests for information;
Follow-up on progress in fraud cases;
Evaluate the tax potential of cases and determine if any compliance problems exist;
Research specific technical issues;
Review appropriate examination techniques; and
Urge employees to reach decisions when there is enough information to do so.
Review repeat cases from the last workload review to determine if the employee has followed the directions provided or previously agreed upon.
Review cases inactive for a specified period of time.
Identify the specific reason for no action or follow up by the employee.
Identify and evaluate delays caused by the taxpayer or practitioner
Determine if the employee consistently has inactive cases and why.
Identify cases that require mutual agreement on additional work required and set target dates for completion.
Work in process and status 10 inventory should be reviewed during the workload review to ensure assigned work is commensurate with the employee's grade.
Determine during the workload review if specialist referrals are warranted (international, engineering, employment, employee plans, exempt organizations, and computer audit specialist, etc.)
Review cases involving specialists to ensure effective and efficient use of resources.
Review issues to determine if technical advice or Area Counsel involvement is warranted.
During the workload review the technical time report should be reviewed for the last month to obtain a pattern regarding time charged.
The manager should analyze case files and ERCS reports for the following:
Consider the time charged by the examiner in relation to information in the case file.
Determine if the employee is planning time and scheduling activities in advance to prevent down time.
Analyze time spent to determine if examiners are working partial days versus whole days. If partial days are being worked, is this the most efficient and effective use of time. (Field Examination only.)
Determine if work is scheduled at the appropriate location. (Field Examination only.)
Determine if the time and span is commensurate with the complexity of the issues.
Determine if IDR’s are issued timely with specific due dates.
Analyze time spent on non-examination activities.
Ensure that time charges on ERCS match time charges on Form 9984.
During a workload review the following actions should be taken:
Resolve any differences between the employee's inventory and group controls;
Verify the timely requisitioning of related returns under examination;
Confirm statute updates and that the correct alpha codes have been used when required;
Determine if applicable partnership control procedures (PCS) were followed;
Verify that proper controls have been established for substitute/delinquent returns; and
Ensure the project, source, and status codes are correct and timely updated.
Confirm Forms 895 are issued and returned timely.
To achieve our quality objectives, there must be managerial involvement at all stages of the examination. The on-the-job visit (OJV) is one of the most effective tools a group manager has to accomplish this task and is essential since much of an employees’ work and activities are performed independent of a group manager's direct observation.
The manager should have a purpose for making a visit such as observing an examiner’s auditing abilities, observing an examiner’s communication skills, teaching an examiner new auditing techniques, etc. Purposeful and essential visits are valuable. Frequency of visits should be dictated by the needs of the employee and/or the specific case.
Visitation needs can often be pinpointed during a workload review. A group manager should avoid making on-the-job visits only at the conclusion of examinations. Visitations made earlier in the audit process provides an opportunity to take corrective actions earlier rather than at the conclusion of an examination when it is too late to impact the progress of the case. Earlier intervention will foster better taxpayer relations.
Managers should explain the reason and purpose of their visit to the examiner. Generally, managers will advise the examiner of their planned visit.
Communicate the observations to the examiner after every visit. The observations should include specific factual comments related to the examination and recommendations concerning future actions. They should be documented or summarized in timely feedback addressing as many of the critical job elements as practical. This feedback, as well as other documented feedback, will serve as a basis for the annual performance evaluations.
An on-the-job visit can be used to observe, assist, and assess employee's knowledge, skills and taxpayer relations. Listed below are areas that should be considered during the on-the-job visit:
Planning and scheduling the examination;
Accounting skills and tax law knowledge;
Workpapers and reports; and,
Closing the examination.
Listed below are a few of the EQRS quality attributes that lend themselves to being rated in an on-the-job visit case review. This list is not meant to be all-inclusive, but rather to assist a group manager in this particular type of case review. A group manager should use their own judgment to determine which quality attributes are most applicable for a specific review.
Attribute 101, Pre-Plan Activity - Was the pre-plan appropriate?
Attribute 604, Meet and Deal - Did the examiner communicate appropriately?
Attribute 440, Audit/Compliance Interview - Was the interview effective and sufficient information obtained to understand the taxpayer/business operations?
Review the employee's work plan to determine if all large, unusual, and questionable issues (LUQ) have been addressed. Provide suggestions to the employee when warranted.
Observe the examiner's professionalism, taxpayer relations, and communication skills.
Determine if employee has requested proper books and records.
Determine if the taxpayer has submitted the requested books and records. If not, determine if proper follow-up has been made to secure the necessary records.
The group manager should review the case file during an OJV for proper financial and tax accounting. The manager should:
Determine if the examiner considered LUQ items throughout the course of the examination.
Determine if the examiner expanded and contracted the scope as appropriate.
Determine if the examiner properly evaluated oral testimony.
Determine if the examination techniques used are appropriate based on internal controls.
The group manager should review the case file to determine the following:
Workpapers are being contemporaneously prepared.
Workpapers document the appropriate information to support the issues examined during and at the conclusion of the examination. Copies of information are included in the workpaper file only when relevant. Unnecessary copies of taxpayer records have not been included.
Risk analysis workpapers (Field Examination only), mandatory leadsheets, and issue leadsheets are being prepared, used, and properly indexed to Form 4318, Examination Workpapers Index, or Form 4318-OA, Examination Workpapers Index - Office Audit.
Observe the examiner's presentation of the audit findings. Audit findings should be presented in a professional manner.
Observe the interaction between the examiner and the taxpayer and/or representative. Ensure the examiner provides them with an opportunity to present any additional evidence, oral testimony, or other pertinent arguments regarding the audit issues.
Perform a cursory inspection of every closed case. See IRM 22.214.171.124.11, Closing Returns - General. From this inspection and your knowledge of the case, you can determine if a more in-depth review is warranted.
Assessment of an examiner's performance and feedback should be summarized in timely documentation, addressing as many of the quality attributes as applicable.
A group manager should be satisfied that the work product flowing from the group meets or exceeds the quality attributes provided in IRM Exhibit 4.8.3-1, Quality Attributes.
A group manager should not rely solely on completed case reviews to assess performance, identify concerns, solve problems, and manage inventories. Although a completed case review is a helpful tool, a group manager must realize that, at this point, the examination has been completed. It is too late to change the direction of the examination and ensure that quality is built into the process. In-process case reviews may provide a better opportunity for earlier managerial involvement to enhance communication with the taxpayer and/or representative, reduce examination span, identify additional compliance issues, or provide guidance regarding scope limitations.
A completed case review can be used to assess the knowledge, skills, and taxpayer relations of the examiner. It can also be used to assess the quality of the examination. Listed below are areas that should be considered during a completed case review:
Examination planning and scheduling;
Accounting skills and tax law knowledge;
Workpapers and reports; and
Use of time.
The group manager should review the case file to determine if:
The examiner recognized and addressed all LUQ issues.
The examination span was reasonable.
Compliance checks were completed and documented in the case file.
The preplan time was commensurate with the complexity of the return.
Related and multiple year returns warranting examination were examined.
The group manager should review the case file to determine if:
The examiner expanded and contracted the scope as appropriate.
The examiner used appropriate techniques to verify income.
The examiner properly evaluated the relationship between financial accounting and tax accounting.
The examiner properly evaluated oral testimony.
The examiner applied the required accounting and financial skills and knowledge to reconcile the books and records to the tax return and analyze financial statements.
The examiner recognized and pursued indications of fraud if they were present.
The tax law has been appropriately applied. The factual development of the case should support the conclusion reached.
The group manager should review the case file to determine if:
The workpapers were properly documented. They should reflect examination techniques employed, records reviewed, applicable tax law citations, and conclusion reached.
The workpapers were contemporaneously prepared. Determine if the examiner spent time duplicating effort by recreating workpapers.
Risk analysis workpapers (Field Examination only), mandatory leadsheets and issue leadsheets were prepared, used, and properly indexed to Form 4318, Examination Workpapers Index, or Form 4318-OA, Examination Workpapers Index - Office Audit.
The depth of the examination was sufficient. If not, provide the examiner with constructive feedback.
The final report submitted to the taxpayer was professional in appearance and supports the conclusions reached during the examination.
The manager should determine if the time expended is commensurate with work performed and reflected in the case file. An ERCS time analysis report can assist and provide the following:
Total time charged to the key return and related returns, if applicable;
List of dates and corresponding time charged to the case; and
Whether consecutive days were worked on the case or there are partial day time charges on nonconsecutive days (Field Examination only).
The manager should determine if the workload priorities of the examiner had an impact on the planning and scheduling activities on the case.
Total cases in process;
Other priority work; and
Details, training, or other assignments.
ETTR reviews should be focused upon effective planning and scheduling techniques, with an emphasis on taking "meaningful" timely actions on in-process cases to bring them to closure.
A group manager should ensure examiners are properly determining when to expand or limit the audit scope.
Assessment of the employee's work observed during the review should be communicated in timely written or oral feedback.
ETTR reviews should provide a quality check on the accuracy of the form preparation.
The depth and timing of these reviews is determined by Area Director or Territory Manager guidelines.
Listed below are a few of the EQRS quality attributes that lend themselves to being rated in a review of an ETTR. This list is not meant to be all-inclusive, but rather to assist a group manager in this particular type of case review. A group manager should use their own judgment to determine which quality attributes are most applicable for a specific review.
Attribute 100, Protection of Statute of Limitations - Were statute issues appropriately addressed?
Attribute 509, Time Charged - On cases with high time, was the time commensurate with the work performed?
Attribute 510, Time Span - On inactive cases, were actions timely?
Attribute 502, Workload Management - Was work appropriately and logically planned through the use of a planning calendar? Were appointments and follow-up work appropriately scheduled? Was work appropriately prioritized?
The analysis process should be utilized to review the ETTR to observe planning, scheduling, time management skills, and to identify inactive cases.
The time analysis and review process should verify timely contacts are made and work is properly planned and scheduled.
Ensure there is a balance of inventory in the opening, active, and closing stages. Determine if there is a need for additional case assignments.
Determine if time is effectively utilized by analyzing direct versus indirect time. Review reports to determine if time is charged in full or partial day time increments and on consecutive days.
Review planning calendars to determine if:
Time is scheduled for pre-audit work on new cases (Office Exam only)
Portion of audit spent in field vs. office vs. flexiplace (Field Exam only).
Determine if related return pick-ups are completed at the appropriate time when significant noncompliance issues exist. Cases should be updated to Status 12 when started.
Verify the examiner is working on cases in priority sequence to the extent possible.
For Field Examination only, determine if mutual commitment dates (MCD) are set for all cases in process according to guidelines. Ensure that dates are realistic and that planned actions are documented on the examiner's planning calendars to aid in meeting the MCDs.
The following items can be used during this review:
ERCS Overage Report (IVL);
ERCS Inactive Case Report; and
ERCS Closed Case Report.
Managerial directions and guidance should be summarized and recorded on specific cases on Form 9984, Examining Officer's Activity Record.
Observations of general activities in the work area can provide a group manager with indicators of the work atmosphere of the group and whether a productive work environment exists. Casual and brief visits with employees in the work area permit a group manager to provide assistance in an informal and time-saving manner. Some of the benefits gained through informal interactions are:
Solutions to work difficulties;
Substitution of oral feedback for written feedback;
Timely communication of new procedural and technical developments; and
Identify and correct improper or ineffective work habits.
Informal discussions with employees may result in solving many work problems. To foster effective communication with employees, avoid assessing negative performance as a result of informal interactions.
Solicit written feedback when employees are given assignments outside of the group. Some of these assignments will include:
Details to Technical Services staff;
Acting group manager; and
Details to other divisions.
Disciplinary and adverse actions are tools that a group manager can use to enforce the rules, regulations, and work requirements that allow the Service to accomplish its mission in an effective and efficient manner.
The goal of both disciplinary and adverse actions is to use the lowest level of discipline possible to correct inappropriate behavior. Each case is considered individually. See the references below for various actions and options.
Seek assistance from the Labor and Employee Relations Office whenever dealing with any conduct problem that has the potential to result in a disciplinary action.
IRM 6.751, Discipline and Disciplinary Actions
IRM 6.752, Disciplinary Suspensions and Adverse Actions
Managers' iManage resource center located athttps://portal.ds.irsnet.gov/sites/iManage/SitePages/Home.aspx
Document 11678, 2016 National Agreement - Internal Revenue Service (IRS) and National Treasury Employees Union (NTEU).
Employees are entitled to present grievances without restraint, interference, coercion, discrimination, or reprisal. Grievances should be considered fairly and impartially, and processed expeditiously. Listed below are resources that provide guidance regarding the processing of a grievance:
IRM 6.771.1, Agency Grievance System (AGS);
Managers' iManage resource center located at https://portal.ds.irsnet.gov/sites/iManage/SitePages/Home.aspx;
Document 11678, 2016 National Agreement - Internal Revenue Service (IRS) and National Treasury Employees Union (NTEU).
A group manager must ensure that support staff, paraprofessional, and technical employees receive training and guidance for successful performance in their group. Assess each employee’s abilities and performance, in order to develop the individual in their current position and for higher-level and more responsible work. In many instances, the Service provides formal training programs designed to meet the employee’s basic and advanced needs. These programs provide for classroom training, on-the-job instruction, continuing professional education (CPE), correspondence courses, and other approaches. Become familiar with the purpose and content of the various training programs and contact the Area training coordinator for additional assistance.
To be successful, a group manager must be aware of the talents, current level of accomplishments, goals, and aspirations of the group's employees. Completing employee profiles for the group's employees will provide a basic foundation for assessing the group’s training and development needs. The degree of imagination, ingenuity, and creativity in this vital area is up to the group manager. Mentoring and frontline management readiness programs provide for the identification and development of employees who exhibit management skills and potential. Review each employee’s Career Learning Plan (CLP) and provide assignments to implement the plan.
Listed below are references that may be helpful in developing employees:
Human Capital Office Workforce & Career Planning website located at http://hco.web.irs.gov/workplan/index.html;
Human Capital Office LEADS Development and Training website located at http://hco.web.irs.gov/devtrain/index.html;
Document 11678, 2016 National Agreement - Internal Revenue Service (IRS) and National Treasury Employees Union (NTEU), Article 30, Section 2(D), Training;
Form 10094, Career Learning Plan - Employee, can be used to prepare a Career Learning Plan; and
ELMS located at https://elms.web.irs.gov/.
Learn and Lead 24/7 offers a wide variety of courses, books, videos, job aids and more.
A group manager is responsible for ensuring new employees receive quality training. A group manager must be involved with trainees throughout their classroom and on-the-job training, and work closely with the Area training coordinator.
A group manager is responsible for ensuring employees receive quality CPE. CPE should be presented in accordance with the current fiscal year guidelines. A group manager is responsible for ensuring examiners and support staff receive the training they need to perform their job.
A group manager may identify other training needs. Group meetings, self-study, external seminars, or memoranda may be effective methods for delivering other training needs.
Employee development is a shared responsibility between a group manager and employees. Each employee should prepare an Employee Career Learning Plan (CLP) to meet their specific needs. This plan should be updated as actions are accomplished.
Document 11678, 2016 National Agreement - Internal Revenue Service (IRS) and National Treasury Employees Union (NTEU), provides that employees should also spend their own time on self-development; and
A group manager should develop a monitoring and follow-up system to meet the individual needs of each employee. An effective CLP should be:
Employee development is directed toward improving skills in present and target positions. This can be accomplished through a variety of activities including: details to other areas or functions, instructing, OJI, acting group manager assignments, task force, and special projects.
A group manager is an advocate for group employees. A group manager can help employees achieve their career objectives by remembering:
Enthusiasm is contagious;
Clearly shared objectives and standards are a must;
Intermediate goals must be set, shared, and monitored;
Small successes build confidence;
Individual performance is evaluated against set standards; and
Prompt corrective action may be necessary.
Identifying, planning, and monitoring of employee needs and their development requires open communication. Direct involvement and ongoing attention are essential to the enhancement of employees’ skills and career advancement.
Remember, a group manager is only as effective as the employees in the group. Thus, it stands to reason a group manager needs to assist in employee’s development by:
Encouraging and appreciating excellence;
Creating a climate of support, encouragement, recognition and team spirit; and
Remaining flexible and resourceful.
Personal career objectives are a shared responsibility between a group manager and territory manager. Look for guidance in developing professional goals and objectives.
Increased responsibility, advancement, and job enrichment should continue throughout a group manager's career. A group manager should develop and fully utilize a career developmental plan. Managerial career planning requires goals, actions, and commitment. Visit the Human Capital Office Workforce & Career Planning website located at http://hco.web.irs.gov/workplan/careerpath/index.html for additional information.
A group manager plays a vital role in accomplishing the Service's mission. It is essential that all levels of management identify and prioritize expectations
The SB/SE Commissioner establishes and prioritizes goals for each fiscal year as outlined in the Strategic Plan and the Examination Program Letter for the fiscal year. Policy statements, internal revenue manual procedures, and other documents provide guidelines for achieving these strategies.
Determine the priority of available workload in light of existing commitments, planned objectives, and procedural requirements.
A group’s work can be divided into three categories. See IRM 126.96.36.199.5.2, Inventory Types.
It is essential that a group manager understands priorities, monitors them closely, and ensures their attainment. Some mandatory programs, such as headquarters directed projects, have definite interim completion goals that should be attained. When assigning returns to examiners, mandatory and priority cases must receive first consideration. Although transferring work between examiners is not desirable, it could be required to satisfy priority needs.
Some examples of priority cases are:
Cases in which either the government’s or the taxpayer’s interest is in jeopardy due to imminent expiration of the statute of limitations;
Bankruptcy or receivership cases on which the date for filing claims is about to expire;
Taxpayer Advocate Service (TAS) cases;
Cases returned by Technical Services for reconsideration;
Requests for prompt assessment;
Pre-identified art evaluation cases;
Delinquent account cases being held by Collection pending action by Examination;
Cases involving informant’s claims/letters;
Partnership and fiduciary cases involving Form 8340, PCS Establish or Add with Notice Generation;
Inadequate records follow-up examination;
Claims for refund;
Overage cases; and
Offers in Compromise.
Technical advisors/issue specialists facilitate the development of examiners' expertise by providing guidance on issues specific to certain industries or return types and provide technical support to Area examiners. They are responsible for preparing issue guidance and Audit Technique Guides (ATG) that provide auditing techniques, assist with issue identification and development, and tax law interpretation. ATGs can be accessed from the IRS.gov website athttps://www.irs.gov/businesses/small-businesses-self-employed/audit-techniques-guides-atgs.
The technical advisory program involves industries and businesses selected because of possible noncompliance. The purpose of specializing is to allow technicians to develop expertise in the industry. Industry specialization also allows the Service to take consistent positions with certain industries and issues. Technical advisors located in LB&I and issue specialists located in SB/SE are both available to assist examiners.
These are high priority programs which have significant impact on future compliance with widespread geographic implications. These projects may be initiated at any time. A group manager's early involvement and continual monitoring is critical.
The objectives of CIPs are to identify whether noncompliance exists, determine the reasons for noncompliance, reduce noncompliance, and make recommendations for increasing future compliance.
CIPs are any activities involving contact with specific taxpayers within a group, using either internal or external data to identify potential areas of noncompliance within the group, for the purpose of correcting the noncompliance. The term CIP refers to activities formerly categorized as Return Compliance Programs (RCP), Information Gathering Projects (IGP), Compliance 2000 Projects, etc. See IRM 4.17, Compliance Initiative Projects, for additional information on CIPs.
Local source work consists of high-yield returns identified at the group level and coordinated with the local Planning and Special Programs (PSP) function. Historically, this work has proven to be much more productive than DIF source returns.
A group manager has a responsibility to be innovative in developing local source work. Ensure CIP guidelines are followed when initiating this type of case work.
CDE is a workload identification, planning and delivery system operating in a web-based environment.
The benefits of CDE are:
Faster delivery of returns into the audit stream from the time of filing;
Provides 3-year return facsimile, entity data, and related returns
Automated case building options include IDRS, CBRS, third party data (Choice Point), Schedules K-1, and related returns.;
Just in time delivery - return orders no longer need to be placed months in advance;
Most classification can be performed locally.
CDE facsimile returns are used in place of the original return.
For additional information and help refer to the CDE website located at http://mysbse.web.irs.gov/exam/tip/cde/default.aspx.
Governmental Liaison is a program designed to foster joint tax administration between the IRS and state taxing agencies. It also promotes joint initiatives with other federal agencies, local governments, state agencies (other than taxing agencies), and private-sector organizations.
Governmental Liaison objectives include:
Improve voluntary and enforced compliance;
Reduce taxpayer burden;
Enhance service to taxpayers; and
Allow IRS and state agencies to perform more efficiently and cost effectively.
Field Governmental Liaison initiatives may include:
Joint early intervention and education;
Joint enforcement; and
Joint technological activities.
Ensure that referrals to specialists, when warranted, are made in a timely manner and that examiners are working together to complete the examination as soon as possible. Examples of referrals that may be necessary are:
Employment Tax Specialist;
Employee Plans Specialist;
Excise Tax Specialist;
Computer Audit Specialists;
For additional information on specialist referrals see IRM 188.8.131.52.5, Referrals for Specialists.
Fraud awareness is part of every program. Examiners should be alert for indications of fraud and are encouraged to discuss these cases with a group manager. The determination of civil or criminal fraud and the development necessary in the case should be discussed thoroughly. A Fraud Technical Advisor (FTA) can provide assistance in developing fraud cases. See IRM 25.1, Fraud Handbook.
Examiners must discuss any potential fraud case they have with their group manager.
Occasionally, a group manager will be requested to provide resources to assist in conducting grand jury investigations. Because of the confidentiality of grand jury information, only a limited number of designated officials are permitted to receive this information. This does not include examination group managers, unless the manager is included on the 6(e) order.
Examiners should be made aware of their limited responsibility when assisting in grand jury investigations. The sole responsibility of the examiner is to examine books and records and interview third parties to determine the income of the targets of the grand jury. Investigations frequently continue for extended periods; therefore, it is important that feedback on examiner performance is received from the CI manager. The specifics of the investigation activity cannot be provided. However, specifics concerning the examiner’s performance level should be made available to a group manager.
The Fraud Program home page is located at http://sbseservicewide.web.irs.gov/Fraud/default.aspx.
Group managers are responsible for ensuring that information and property assigned to the group is provided protection commensurate with its level of sensitivity and that all assets are protected against destruction, theft, or abuse.
At least annually, a group manager must perform periodic "functional reviews" of their employees’ work space to ensure that laptop computers, Sensitive But Unclassified (SBU) information, and PII are protected at all times. Functional reviews measure adherence to security requirements and procedures that apply to each manager's office or functional area. See IRM 184.108.40.206.1, Functional Reviews, for additional guidance regarding the reporting requirements.
A group manager should periodically perform "after hours reviews" to determine whether documents, property and monies are being adequately protected when not in the custody of authorized IRS personnel. See IRM 220.127.116.11.2, After Hours Review, for additional guidance.
For additional information visit the following websites:
MITS Cybersecurity home page at https://organization.ds.irsnet.gov/sites/Cyber/ for information on how to report a security incident;
Privacy, Governmental Liaison and Disclosure, Think Data Protection located at https://organization.ds.irsnet.gov/sites/vldp/Privacy/PII/TDP for protecting and safeguarding SBU data and PII.
Annual mandatory briefings can seem routine. The information a group manager and employees learn is integral to sustaining the integrity of our workforce and ensuring a secure and safe workplace.
A group manager must ensure all mandatory briefings are timely completed. If there are questions concerning these briefings the territory manager should be consulted. Mandatory briefings include but are not limited to the following:
Prevention of Sexual Harassment (POSH);
Safety and Health; and
(1) Computer Security;
(2) UNAX - See IRM 10.5.5, IRS Unauthorized Access, Attempted Access or Inspection of Taxpayer Records (UNAX) Program Policy, Guidance and Requirements and IRM 18.104.22.168.2., Taxpayer Browsing Protection Act; and
Throughout this manual the importance of working as a team in order to accomplish the mission of the Service is discussed. The team is made up of all the employees of our organization. The interaction of employees is the lifeblood of the organization. Initial interactions in a work environment will form the basis for relationships with the key people a group manager must work for, with, and through.
The following presents an overview of the individuals and functions a group manager will look to for information, assistance, and guidance. These are all members of the team with whom a group manager must work effectively in order to accomplish the organization’s goals.
For the most part, an examiner's contact with Appeals and Area Counsel is through their group manager. Recognize Appeals' and Area Counsel's responsibilities and support their efforts.
Cases in which taxpayers request an Appeals conference should be promptly transferred. See IRM 22.214.171.124.11.5.
An examiner must request and receive permission from his or her group manager before initiating any communication related to a case with an Appeals employee, unless the case is being worked through Fast Track Settlement. The group manager will determine if the proposed communication is appropriate and whether it is an ex parte communication covered by RRA 98 limitations and further clarified by Rev. Proc. 2012–18. See IRM 126.96.36.199 paragraph (4), Responsibility for Compliance with the Provisions of the Restructuring and Reform Act (RRA) 98 Section 1001(a)(4), for the group manager’s responsibilities with respect to the request.
Area Counsel is available for legal guidance in situations such as summons enforcement, assertion of the civil fraud penalty, and interpretation of any legal issues where Counsel can be of assistance.
Close coordination with Collection personnel is essential on failure-to-file referrals, frivolous filer/nonfiler cases, and claims for refunds submitted during the collection process. Collection personnel must be involved with unpaid agreed deficiency cases of more than $100,000 prior to closing. If the taxpayer requests an installment agreement that exceeds examination limits, collection personnel should be contacted to assist the taxpayer. See IRM 188.8.131.52, Coordination with Collection, for additional information.
The success of the area fraud program requires cooperation between group employees and Criminal Investigation. A group manager must ensure that adequate staffing is available and properly utilized to complete joint investigations, ensure that quarterly meetings are conducted to monitor the timely completion of joint investigations, and obtain feedback on the quality of fraud referrals. In addition, consider utilizing Criminal Investigation employees to conduct workshops on fraud development.
The Disclosure Officer can provide invaluable assistance in resolving questions regarding disclosures of tax returns, tax return information and Privacy Act (PA) information, such as personnel records. The Disclosure Officer handles all requests for information under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) or the PA. A FOIA or PA request received in the group should be immediately forwarded to the Disclosure Officer for processing. However, absent a FOIA or PA request, the examiner/group manager has the authority to provide the taxpayer/representative with copies of documents related to the issues in question after reviewing the requested documents for any questionable items. Disclosure should be contacted if there are any questionable items that may be withheld from the requester.
Subpoenas received by employees must be immediately faxed or hand-carried to the Disclosure Officer for processing. An employee is allowed to testify in a tax administration case as a witness for the government without a subpoena and without an authorization from the Territory Manager. A group manager should make full use of the local Disclosure Officer by extending an invitation to attend a group meeting and requesting orientation for new employees (including technical, para-professional, and support staff). See IRM 11.3, Disclosure of Official Information.
TIGTA should be viewed as a positive resource in maintaining a respected, ethical organization. They support employees against false claims, threats, and accusations, as well as investigate allegations of wrongdoing. Invite TIGTA to group meetings to emphasize their role.
A group manager should not conduct an investigation into the matters listed above under any circumstances unless TIGTA concurrence is obtained.
All information received concerning misconduct of IRS employees or officials will be reported to the local TIGTA office, TIGTA hotline at 1-800-366-4484, or e-mail through the website at http://www.treas.gov/tigta/.
After TIGTA conducts an investigation of alleged improper conduct, the report will be presented to management for review and decision on whether disciplinary action will be required. If no disciplinary action is required, one of the following actions must be taken:
Closed without action letter
Warning or caution letter
TIGTA, Office of Audit, is an independent third party which reviews IRS systems, procedures, and effectiveness.
RAS is comprised of the following offices:
National Research Program (NRP)
Office of Program Evaluation & Risk Analysis (OPERA)
Servicewide Policy, Directives & Electronic Research (SPDER)
Statistics of Income (SOI)
Office of Research (OR)
RAS identifies noncompliance at the issue level. Their activities may include demographic, economic, and other studies as requested by the Director, Examination.
The Taxpayer Advocate Service (TAS) is an independent organization within the IRS, led by the National Taxpayer Advocate. Each state, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico has at least one Local Taxpayer Advocate, who is independent of the local IRS office and reports directly to the National Taxpayer Advocate. TAS helps taxpayers resolve problems with the IRS and recommends changes that will prevent the problems.
If a group manager is unable to resolve certain taxpayer complaints or inquiries meeting TAS criteria, a referral may be warranted. Form 911, Request for Taxpayer Advocate Service Assistance (And Application for Taxpayer Assistance Order), should be completed and forwarded to the local TAS office. See IRM 184.108.40.206, TAS Case Criteria, which provides the criteria for referral to TAS.
Prompt action to resolve a taxpayer’s complaint will result in increased respect for the Service. A group manager and their employees share the responsibility for maintaining favorable public relations.
C & L coordinates all media contacts. All media contacts must be cleared through the C & L office. C & L may request that a group manager or technical employees make presentations to groups of taxpayers through taxpayer education programs.
The support staff may occasionally have to contact one of the campuses to resolve a return requisition, payment posting, or other problems. Each Campus has three Directors: Accounts Management, Submission Processing and Compliance Services. The relationships established with Campus personnel will prove invaluable to the smooth operation of the group.
The importance of working as a team in order to accomplish the mission of the Service has been discussed throughout this IRM. This team is made up of all Service employees. The following presents an overview of some collateral duties which a group manager may be called upon to handle.
Group managers may be given instructor assignments in both technical and administrative areas. These assignments give a group manager a change of pace and the ability to refresh their skills.
The Senior Commissioner Representative and Commissioner Representatives provide management leadership for cross-functional administrative activities in field offices of the IRS. Duties may include taxpayer concerns, security, supplies, safety, and general operating guidance. See IRM 220.127.116.11.6, Senior Commissioner's Representatives Branch, for additional information.
A group manager may play a key role in recruiting qualified candidates. When internal employees are being considered for a crossover to another position or external applicants are seeking initial appointments, a group manager may be in a position to influence an individual’s decision to work for the Internal Revenue Service. Represent the Service in a professional manner when talking with prospective employees or school officials. Review recruitment literature and talk with a personnel staffing specialist before making recruitment visits to obtain knowledge regarding job duties and educational requirements.
A group manager is responsible for end-to-end management of the group. Some additional areas of responsibility include the following:
Dissemination of instructions - a group manager should ensure instructions and guidelines from management are timely disseminated to the work group. A group manager should meet with their group and discuss emerging issues, new developments, and revised procedures as warranted.
Managerial controls - a group manager should maintain effective group controls to ensure work assigned is completed in an efficient manner. Ensure work assignments are completed in a fair and impartial manner. Employee suggestions for improvements should be given consideration and full employee engagement encouraged. A group manager should ensure all employees are made aware when another person has been designated to act on behalf of the group manager.
Personnel Issues - personnel issues that may occur in the group include the following:
Review time and attendance records periodically to determine if any areas require attention.
Employees should promptly notify their group manager when they will be absent.
Employee vacation time should be scheduled in advance to facilitate proper planning and ensure employees are given an opportunity to take their accrued annual leave.
A group manager should review employee position descriptions and critical job elements to ensure they are current.
Access to tax administration tools - A group manager should ensure employees have access to tax administration tools needed to do their job. They may include but are not limited to the following:
Tax law research tools;
Asset locator tools; and