- 7.11.6 Multiemployer Plans
- 18.104.22.168 Program Scope and Objectives
- 22.214.171.124 Auxiliary Documents
- 126.96.36.199 Incorporating Auxiliary Documents by Reference
- 188.8.131.52 Remedial Amendment Cycle (RAC)
- 184.108.40.206 Effective Dates of Certain Amendments
- 220.127.116.11 Plan Review Guidelines and Language Requirements
- 18.104.22.168.1 IRC Sections Automatically Satisfied
- 22.214.171.124.2 Benefits and Service Credit Conditioned on Making Contributions
- 126.96.36.199.3 Suspension of Benefits
- 188.8.131.52.4 Central Laborers Pension Fund v. Heinz
- 184.108.40.206.5 Delayed Payment of Accrued Benefit Due to Application Requirement
- 220.127.116.11.6 Delayed Retirement
- 18.104.22.168.7 IRC 411(d)(6) Protection of a COLA
- 22.214.171.124.8 Limitations of IRC 415
- 126.96.36.199.8.1 Compensation Limit
- 188.8.131.52.8.2 Definition of Severance from Employment
- 184.108.40.206.8.3 Application of the Minimum $10,000 Limitation on Benefits
- 220.127.116.11.8.4 Benefits Attributable to Service with More Than One Employer
- 18.104.22.168.8.5 Aggregation of Benefits under More Than One Plan
- 22.214.171.124.8.6 Aggregation Only for Benefits Provided by the Employer
- 126.96.36.199.8.7 Plan Disqualification Rules for Aggregated Plans
- 188.8.131.52.9 Defined Contribution Plan
- 184.108.40.206.10 Cash or Deferred Arrangements (CODAs)
- 220.127.116.11.10.1 401(k) Plan Language for Multiemployer Plans
- 18.104.22.168.10.2 CODAs in Money Purchase Plans
- 22.214.171.124.11 Thirteenth Check Distributions
- 126.96.36.199.12 Amendments in Compliance with Special Funding Rules under IRC 432
- 188.8.131.52.13 Plans Terminated for PBGC and Title IV Purposes
- Exhibit 7.11.6-1 Sample Language of a CODA in a Money Purchase Plan
Part 7. Rulings and Agreements
Chapter 11. Employee Plans Determination Letter Program
Section 6. Multiemployer Plans
September 06, 2017
(1) This transmits revised IRM 7.11.6, Employee Plans Determination Letter Program, Multiemployer Plans.
(1) Updated and renamed IRM 184.108.40.206, Overview of Multiemployer Plans, to Program Scope and Objectives. Also added IRM 220.127.116.11.1, Background, and IRM 18.104.22.168.2, Acronyms, to add in the internal controls of the IRM as required by IRM 22.214.171.124.5.
(2) Updated various sections for grammatical rules in the IRS Style Guide.
Robert S. Choi
Director, Employee Plans
Tax Exempt and Government Entities
Purpose: This IRM describes the procedures for reviewing Employee Plans (EP) Determination Letter (DL) applications for multiemployer plans.
Audience: EP Determinations and Quality Assurance (QA) staff
Policy Owner: Director, EP
Program Owner: EP
Program Goals: The goal of EP Determinations is to ensure that plans are in compliance with the tax laws by reviewing applications for DLs and opinion letters and to protect the public interest by applying the tax law with integrity and fairness to all.
A multiemployer plan is a plan maintained per one or more Collective Bargaining Agreements (CBA) and to which more than one employer is required to contribute. IRC 414(f)
Multiemployer plans allow employees who move among employers within unionized industries - such as trucking, construction and grocery-store chains - to participate in the same retirement plan negotiated under either separate or common CBAs.
Reciprocity agreements extend this principle by allowing participants to aggregate service credit or benefits among one or more different multiemployer plans.
Non-collectively bargained employees can participate in a multiemployer plan under a participation agreement.
Multiemployer plans are subject to the qualification rules under IRC 401(a), including, but not limited to:
Joint and survivor
Multiemployer plans are also subject to additional qualification rules under IRC 413(b).
Delegation Order 7-1a, delegates the authority to issue determination letters on the qualified status of pension, profit-sharing, stock bonus, annuity, and employee stock ownership plans to the Director, EP. See IRM 126.96.36.199.1.
Find a complete list of delegation orders governing EP Rulings and Agreements at Delegation Orders by Process.
See IRM 7.1.1, Exhibit 7.1.1-1 for a complete list the major EP revenue procedures currently in effect.
The table lists commonly used acronyms and their definitions
Acronym Definition CBA Collective Bargaining Agreements CODA Cash Or Deferred Arrangements COLA Cost of Living Adjustment DB Defined Benefit DL Determination Letter EGTRRA Economic Growth &Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2001 EP Employee Plans NRA Normal Retirement Age MRPA Multiemployer Pension Reform Act of 2014 PBGC Pension Benefit Guarantee Corporation PPA Pension Protection Act of 2006 QA Quality Assurance RAC Remedial Amendment Cycle
A Collective Bargaining Agreement(CBA) is a written agreement negotiated between a local, regional, or national union and individual employers or an association bargaining for a group of employers. It generally lasts one to five years. Among other terms, the CBA:
Specifies the basis for employers to make contributions.
Sets the rate of contribution.
Identifies the class of employees covered by the plan.
A Reciprocity Agreement is an agreement among two or more multiemployer plans. These agreements:
Allow participants to aggregate their service under several plans to qualify for a plan benefit.
Spell out how much of the benefit each multiemployer plan pays.
Reciprocity agreements are optional but, if used, allow a multiemployer plan "home plan" to accept contributions for participants or recognize service credits that participants earn for service they perform for employers under an unrelated multiemployer plan "away plan." In other words, the agreement allows a plan to recognize "reciprocity service." Reciprocity agreements don’t violate the exclusive benefit rule. They typically are one of two types:
"Money follows the worker" agreements, where contributions a worker accrues in the away plan are transferred to the worker’s home plan and applied to benefits under the home plan.
"Pro rata" agreements, where service a participant earns toward a benefit under the away plan is recognized for vesting and/or accrual purposes under the home plan.
A Participation agreement (or side agreement) allows non-collectively bargained employees to participate in a multiemployer plan. Non-collectively bargained employees can only participate in a multiemployer plan if the plan specifically allows it. A participation agreement will say who is eligible and the amount of benefit/contribution they’ll receive.
A Funding Improvement plan is a plan which consists of the actions, including options or a range of options to be proposed to the bargaining parties, which if undertaken by the plan are reasonably expected to close the plan’s funding gap by 1/3, or otherwise improve the plan’s funded status per IRC 432(c)(3).
A Rehabilitation plan is a plan which consists of actions, including options or a range of options, which if undertaken by the plan are reasonably expected to bring the plan out of critical status by the end of the rehabilitation period, or otherwise forestall plan insolvency, per IRC 432(e)(3).
A plan sponsor is permitted to incorporate the terms of a CBA, participation agreement or reciprocity agreement by reference to inform employers and participants of the specific plan terms. However, this incorporation doesn’t always provide sufficient information for IRS to review a DL application.
When plans incorporate provisions of auxiliary documents by reference, there are two separate issues. Make sure:
You can review the plan to determine that it satisfies all of the qualification requirements necessary to receive a favorable DL.
The plan language is sufficient for it to receive reliance on the letter for the specific sections incorporated by reference.
Generally, if the sponsor wants reliance for parts of these auxiliary documents, then they must submit the exact language of the parts being incorporated as an appendix to the plan. We don’t accept CBAs, participation agreements and reciprocity agreements in their entirety for review.
For DL applications with a control date after September 17, 2015, if any of the plan’s IRC 401(a) provisions (coverage, benefit formula, distribution options, class of covered employees, etc.) are incorporated by referencing an auxiliary document, then the plan sponsor must add the applicable parts of the auxiliary document to the plan, regardless of whether they want reliance for these parts of the auxiliary documents.
The two most common provisions plans incorporated from CBAs are class of covered employees and contribution rates. Both these provisions relate to IRC 401(a) issues, and if incorporated by reference, must be attached to the document as an appendix.
A money purchase plan states that contributions for each participant are made in accordance with the CBA schedule. The contribution part of the CBA must be attached to the plan as an appendix to ensure that the contribution schedule is definitely determinable and not subject to employer discretion.
If the plan allows the Board of Trustees to enter into reciprocity agreements, the plan should:
State whether the agreement uses the "Money follows the worker" or "Pro rata" rule or attach the applicable section of the reciprocity agreement as an appendix.
Identify the class of employees benefiting under the agreement and their benefit formula or attach the applicable section of the participation agreement as an appendix.
A sponsor doesn’t have to amend the plan document if they adopt a Funding Improvement or Rehabilitation plan unless the Funding Improvement or Rehabilitation plan changes the plan’s provisions (IRC 432). If a plan is adopted by the trustees and approved by the bargaining parties, the sponsor needs to either:
Amend any plan provisions that are changed by the Funding Improvement or Rehabilitation plan.
Add a provision in the plan that states the Funding Improvement or Rehabilitation plan is controlling over any inconsistent provisions and incorporate the Funding Improvement or Rehabilitation plan into the plan document.
Add caveat 7033 to DLs for all multiemployer plans which states: "This determination letter does not provide reliance for any portion(s) of the document that incorporates the terms of an auxiliary agreement (collective bargaining, reciprocity and/or participation agreement), unless the exact language of the section(s) that is being incorporated by reference to the auxiliary agreement has been appended to the document."
Effective January 1, 2017, under Rev. Proc. 2016-37, the RAC system is eliminated and a plan sponsor of an individually designed plan is only permitted to submit a DL application for:
Initial plan qualification
Qualification upon plan termination
Certain other circumstances announced by the IRS
Before January 1, 2017, under Rev. Proc. 2007-44 section 10.02, multiemployer plans:
Could only be individually designed plans.
File in "Cycle D" of the five-year RAC.
For the first five-year cycle, if a cycle D’s 2009 plan year began after February 1, 2009, the sponsor could defer submitting their plan until Cycle E, as long as they timely filed the Cycle E application. The plan was treated as a Cycle E plan (reviewed under the 2009 Cumulative List (CL)) but only for the initial cycle. They filed all subsequent filings in Cycle D.
Governmental multiemployer plans meet the exception under Rev. Proc. 2007-44 section 10.04. Generally, these plans were submitted under "Cycle C."
If a plan changed its status by becoming or ceasing to be a multiemployer plan, the plan’s five-year RAC was then determined per Rev. Proc’s section 9 or 10 (Rev. Proc. 2007-44 section 11.01(6)).
Collectively bargained plans, including multiemployer plans, often have later effective dates for required plan provisions.
They also receive special extensions for certain provisions of new law changes. The charts below show provisions of law/regulatory changes for which collectively bargained plans received extensions.
Economic Growth &Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2001 (EGTRRA) Provision Special Effective Date Vesting for employer matching contributions must be at least as generous as three-year cliff or six-year graded schedule (EGTRRA Section 633). Plan years beginning after the earlier of:
January 1, 2006
later of January 1, 2002, or the last CBA termination date on or after EGTRRA’s enactment (May 26, 2001).
If a sponsor claims the CBA termination date is the plan’s effective date, you may need to review the relevant CBA to verify the delayed effective date applies. Pension Protection Act of 2006 (PPA) Provision Special Effective Date Plans must specify how they will satisfy minimum cost requirements of a qualified transfer of excess pension assets to retiree health accounts. IRC 420(c)(3) May 25, 2007. (Optional for all plans but, if used, must specify how they’ll satisfy minimum cost requirements of a qualified transfer of excess pension assets to retiree health accounts.)
Also, Public Law 110-28 makes technical corrections to an internal cross-reference in IRC 420 to reflect changes made to the minimum funding requirements for Defined Benefit (DB) plans under the 2006 PPA. The technical corrections are effective as if included in the 2006 PPA.
Special Rules for DB plans computing accrued benefits by referencing a hypothetical balance or equivalent amounts. "Cash balance plans." IRC 411(a)(13) For a CBA plan ratified on or before November 13, 2015, plan years that begin on or after the later of:
January 1, 2017.
earlier of (i) January 1, 2019, and (ii) the date on which the last CBA for the plan terminates (determined without considering any extension after November 13, 2015)
See 26 CFR 1.411(a)(13)-1
The Qualified Optional Survivor Annuity must be added to all DB plans and other plans mentioned in IRC 401(a)(11). IRC 417(g) Plan years beginning after the earlier of:
later of (i) January 1, 2008, or (ii) the date on which the last CBA for the plan terminates (determined without considering any extension after PPA’s enactment)
January 1, 2009.
If a sponsor claims the CBA termination date is the plan’s effective date, you may need to review the relevant CBA to verify the delayed effective date applies. Regulatory Changes to Normal Retirement Age (NRA) Provision Special Effective Date Plan’s NRA must be an age that is not earlier than the earliest age that is reasonably representative of the typical retirement age for the industry in which the covered workforce is employed. 26 CFR 1.401(a)-1(b)(2) For CBAs ratified and in effect on May 22, 2007, the Regulations are effective the first plan year that begins after the last of the CBAs in effect on May 22, 2007 terminates (without considering any extension of the agreements) or, if earlier, May 22, 2010. If a multiemployer plan has an NRA earlier than age 62, but not earlier than age 55, then the NRA is considered to be reasonably representative of the typical retirement age for the industry in which the covered workforce is employed. However, if the NRA is less than age 55, complete the NRA check sheet in the "NRA Final Regulations" folder on the shared server and send to QA who helps determine if the plan complies with 26 CFR 1.401(a)-1(b)(2).
The following subsections list guidelines to review multiemployer plans for a DL. Also see IRM 4.72.14, Employee Plans Examination Guidelines - Multiemployer Plan Examination Guidelines.
Multiemployer plans automatically satisfy the following code sections for collectively-bargained participants:
IRC 401(a)(4), nondiscrimination
IRC 401(a)(26), minimum participation
IRC 401(a)(35), diversification of assets
IRC 401(m), Average Contribution Percentage test
IRC 410(b), coverage
IRC 416, top-heavy
IRC 436, funding based limits
However, the plan must still satisfy the IRC sections in IRM 188.8.131.52.1 (1) for all non-collectively bargained participants. If a plan covers both collectively and non-collectively bargained employees, the plan must satisfy all of these requirements for the mandatorily disaggregated portion (aka "the non-collectively bargained portion" ) of the plan. See 26 CFR 1.410(b)-2(b)(7); 26 CFR 1.401(a)(4)-1(c)(5); 26 CFR 1.401(a)(26)-1(b)(2)(i) and (ii), 26 CFR 1.416-1, T-38.
Check the eligibility section of the plan document to see if non-collectively bargained employees are permitted to participate. If so, the plan document may be required to satisfy the IRC sections in IRM 184.108.40.206.1 (1).
A pension plan (including a money purchase plan) should not condition a participant’s crediting of service and/or receiving an allocation on the employer’s payment of the contribution. A plan provision that has language withholding an accrual or allocation due to delinquent contributions violates the definitely determinable benefit rule and should be deleted. See Rev. Rul. 85-130.
If a participant’s service credit is withheld due to delinquent contributions, this plan provision also violates the requirement that plans take into account all years of a participant’s service with the employers maintaining the plan for participation and vesting purposes. See DOL Reg. 2530.210.
Review the plan’s suspension of benefit provisions, if any, to determine if they satisfy IRC 411(a)(3)(B) and DOL Reg. 2530.203-3.
A retired participant’s benefit may be suspended if he/she returns to work for at least 40 hours per month in the same industry, same trade or craft, and same geographical region, as were covered by the plan at the time payment commenced.
If the plan language states that a retired participant’s benefit are suspended due to reemployment and it doesn’t meet IRC 411(a)(3)(B) and DOL Reg. 2530.203-3, then the provision is a prohibited forfeiture under IRC 411(a).
Examples of suspension provisions that don’t satisfy DOL Reg. 2530.203-3:
A plan states it will suspend a participant’s benefit as soon as he or she works one hour of non-collectively bargained service. This is a violation of the requirement that benefits not be suspended for a reemployed, retired participant who works less than 40 hours per month.
If an amendment expands the plan’s suspension of benefits provision, for benefits already accrued, it violates IRC 411(d)(6) and must be corrected. See IRM 220.127.116.11.4, Central Laborers’ Pension Fund v. Heinz.
A plan may not be amended to take away a protected right associated with benefits already accrued (26 CFR 1.411(d)-3(a)(3)). Therefore, plans can’t be amended to add or expand a permitted forfeiture under IRC 411(a)(3)(B) (the suspension of benefits on account of reemployment).
This was upheld in Central Laborers’ Pension Fund v. Heinz, 541 U.S. 739 (2004). Thomas Heinz worked as a construction worker and retired. Upon retirement, he began to receive pension payments from the Central Laborers' Pension Plan. He took a job as a supervisor in the construction industry. The pension plan had a list of occupations in which a recipient could not work while receiving pension payments, but construction supervisors was not on that list. After two years, however, Central Laborers' Pension amended the list of prohibited professions to include construction supervisors. As a result, Heinz stopped receiving his pension payment. He filed suit in federal district court. He claimed that the amendment, because it was passed after he had already started receiving the benefits, violated the anti-cutback provision of ERISA and IRC 411(d)(6). Heinz claimed that it had reduced his accrued benefit because the amendment barred Heinz from receiving payments to which he was otherwise eligible. Central Laborers' Pension argued that Heinz was still eligible to receive the same pension, he just could not receive it while working as construction supervisor. The US Supreme Court unanimously held that the amendment to the plan had narrowed Heinz's rights to the benefits promised him at the time he retired, and that such a narrowing violated ERISA. Justice David H. Souter, in the Opinion of the Court, wrote, "[A] participant's benefits cannot be understood without reference to the conditions imposed on receiving those benefits.' ... We simply do not see how, in any practical sense, this change of terms could not be viewed as shrinking the value of Heinz's pension rights and reducing his promised benefits."
Due to conflicting IRS guidance at the time, the Court allowed plans to retroactively correct these types of amendments as long as they were corrected by the last day of the EGTRRA remedial amendment period. See Rev. Proc. 2005-23 and Rev. Proc. 2005-76. A sponsor that adds or expands a permitted forfeiture after that time violates IRC 411(d)(6).
A DB plan that contains language requiring a retiree to file a claim for benefit payments before payment begins must also contain language to actuarially adjust the benefit whenever the annuity starting date occurs after the participants’ normal retirement date (unless the plan provides that the benefit will be suspended under plan terms that satisfy the requirements of DOL Reg. 2530.203-3).
The 7th Circuit Court of Appeals found in Contilli v Teamsters Local 705 Pension Fund, 559 F.3d 720 (7th Cir. 2009) that plan procedures may require a retiree to submit an application to commence benefits before receiving a benefit. However, if a plan chooses to do this, it must also have language to ensure that no impermissible forfeiture will occur to satisfy IRC 411(a)(7).
IRC 411(c)(3) states," If the employee’s accrued benefit is to be determined as an amount other than an annual benefit commencing at normal retirement age, then the employee’s accrued benefit must be the actuarial equivalent of such benefit." For the plan language to be qualified in form, it must define how it’ll adjust the benefit for delayed commencement. It may adjust the benefit in one or more of these ways:
Increasing the amount of each payment so that they are the actuarial equivalent to the amount that would have been paid on the annuity starting date
Retroactively paying the original amount of the benefit that would’ve been paid at the participant’s normal retirement date
Making an additional one-time payment to represent those payments that were missed.
Pension plans that allow a delayed commencement of pension benefits past normal retirement age must actuarially adjust the benefit unless the plan states that the participant’s benefit will be suspended. Not actuarially adjusting a benefit for a delayed commencement creates an impermissible forfeiture. See IRC 411(a)(7) and IRC 411(c)(3).
A plan must also provide that, if retirement is delayed past a participant's required beginning date, it’ll actuarially adjust the participant’s benefit even if the plan also permits suspensions. See 26 CFR 1.401(a)(9)-6.
The plan must contain language stating how it’ll make up the missed payments. This can be done in any one or more of the ways in IRM 18.104.22.168.5(3), Delayed Payment of Accrued Benefit Due To Application Requirement.
An amendment that reduces or eliminates a Cost of Living Adjustment (COLA) feature that is part of the accrued benefit violates IRC 411(d)(6) even if the COLA feature was added to the plan after a participant retired per 26 CFR 1.411(d)-3(a)(1). The Regulation:
Was issued after the decision in Sheet Metal Workers’ National Pension Fund v. C.I.R., 318 F. 3rd 599 (Fourth Cir. 2003), which held that these types of amendments are permitted.
States that the IRS will disqualify any plan that adopts provisions similar to those upheld under Sheet Metal Workers.
Plans that adopt ad hoc COLAs (i.e. a one-time benefit increase for retirees in pay status) for several years in a row may violate IRC 411(d)(6) in the first year that they don’t adopt an ad hoc COLA. See 26 CFR 1.411(d)-4, Q&A-1(c)(1).
Ask the plan sponsor to submit copies of any ad hoc COLA amendments to the plan that might not be included in the restated plan.
If the plan has offered ad hoc COLA's of similar design for at least three years and then fails to offer a COLA in the subsequent year, the plan may have violated IRC 411(d)(6).
There are a number of special rules for applying the IRC 415 limits to multiemployer plans, as described below. See also 26 CFR 1.415(a)-1(c)(4), which lists a convenient cross-reference table for these rules.
The compensation limit of IRC 415(b)(1)(B) doesn’t apply to multiemployer DB plans for limitation years beginning after December 31, 2001. See 26 CFR 1.415(b)-1(a)(6)(ii). IRC 415(b)(11).
Normally, an employee has a severance from employment when the employee ceases to be an employee of the employer maintaining the plan. However, for IRC 415 purposes, a special definition of severance from employment applies for multiemployer plans.
A participant in a multiemployer plan isn’t considered to incur a severance from employment with the employer maintaining the multiemployer plan if the participant continues to be an employee of another employer maintaining the multiemployer plan. See 26 CFR 1.415(a)-1(f)(5)(ii).
The special $10,000 exception in 26 CFR 1.415(b)-1(f)(1) applies to a participant in a multiemployer plan without considering whether that participant ever participated in one or more other plans maintained by the an employer who also maintains the multiemployer plan, as long as none of those other plans were maintained as a result of collective bargaining involving the same employee representative as the multiemployer plan. See 26 CFR 1.415(b)-1(f)(3).
For limitation years before July 1, 2007, 26 CFR 1.415-1(e) stated that to apply IRC 415 limits, a participant’s benefits, compensation and contributions from all employers could either be:
Applied separately to the benefit or contribution attributable to each employer for whom the participant worked.
For limitation years beginning on or after July 1, 2007, the limits may no longer be applied on an employer-by-employer basis. 26 CFR 1.415(a)-1(e) now requires plans to aggregate participant’s benefits, compensation and contributions from all employers maintaining the plan.
Multiemployer plans aren’t aggregated with other multiemployer plans per IRC 415(f)(3) for determining:
Benefits limited under IRC 415(b).
Contributions limited under IRC 415(c).
In spite of the rule in 26 CFR 1.415(a)-1(e) described in IRM 22.214.171.124.8.4, Benefits Attributable to Service with More Than One Employer, under 26 CFR 1.415(f)-1(g)(2)(i), a multiemployer plan may provide that only the benefits under an employer’s multiemployer plan are aggregated with that employer’s non-multiemployer plans.
Therefore, a multiemployer plan may state that if a participating employer has both a multiemployer plan and a single-employer plan, only the participant’s benefits/contributions in the employer’s multiemployer plan are aggregated with the single-employer plan’s benefits/contributions to apply the dollar limit.
The plan document must specify the aggregation of benefits/contributions in the multiemployer and single- employer plan (see IRM 126.96.36.199.8.6 (2)) for it to be effective since it is optional.
As a general rule, if a participant’s annual benefit exceeds the IRC 415(b)(1)(B) dollar limit solely due to the aggregation rules of IRC 415(f)(1), then one or more of the plans is disqualified under 26 CFR 1.415(g)-1(b)(3)(ii) - (iv) until, (not considering the annual benefits/additions under the disqualified plan(s)), the remaining plans satisfy the applicable 415 limits.
If there are two or more plans that haven’t been terminated at any time including the last day of the particular limitation year, and if one or more of those plans is a multiemployer plan, then one or more of the non-terminated non-multiemployer plans (as needed to satisfy the IRC 415 limits) is disqualified in that limitation year (26 CFR 1.415(g)-1(b)(3)(ii)(A)). For this purpose, determine whether a plan is a multiemployer plan as of the last day of the particular limitation year.
If, after applying 26 CFR 1.415(g)-1(b)(3)(ii) in IRM 188.8.131.52.8.7 (1), there are two or more plans and one or more of the plans has been terminated at any time including the last day of the particular limitation year, then one or more of the non-terminated plans (as needed to satisfy the applicable IRC 415 limits) (regardless of whether the plan is a multiemployer plan) is disqualified in that limitation year.
Three plans are aggregated together for purposes of IRC 415(f)(1) and exceed the IRC 415 limits, two plans are single employer plans and one plan is a multiemployer plan. The two single employer plans would be disqualified before the multiemployer, but if the multiemployer plan still failed to meet the IRC 415 limits, it would also be disqualified.
A plan must designate the plan type. For a defined contribution plan, it must designate whether it is a profit sharing or money purchase plan. See IRC 401(a)(27)(B).
Also, per Rev. Rul. 94-76, any money purchase plan amended to become a profit-sharing plan must ensure that any accrued benefits remain subject to the same distribution restrictions (Qualified Joint & Survivor Annuity) that applied before the amendment.
CODAs present certain issues for multiemployer plans, including those described below.
A multiemployer 401(k) plan document should contain all the provisions required of a regular 401(k) plan. This would include:
Method(s) of correction
If the plan contains matching employer contributions or after-tax employee contributions, it should list the necessary 401(m) language.
Most multiemployer plans don’t typically contain compensation definitions or testing methods, unlike many single employer plans, which may lead to operational failures. However, all plans must include an IRC 415(c)(3) definition of compensation.
Because of the inherent design of multiemployer plans, plan administrators of multiemployer 401(k) plans may have trouble getting accurate compensation data for participants from the various contributing employers.
However, multiemployer 401(k) plans, like others, must provide a method for identifying whether Highly Compensated Employees (HCEs) participate in the plan.
If HCEs do participate, then the plan likely has to perform the Actual Deferral Percentage (ADP) test.
If the ADP test is necessary, it’s essential to have accurate compensation data to properly compute it.
Because of their lack of access to actual compensation data, some multiemployer 401(k) plans may impermissibly contain language to approximate participant compensation.
The only money purchase plans permitted to include a CODA are pre- ERISA plans (existed June 27, 1974 and included the CODA at that time). See IRC 401(k)(1).
Plans or CBAs may contain provisions that, although not described as a CODA, result in elective deferrals. Unless this arrangement is part of a profit-sharing plan and satisfies the requirements of IRC 401(k), the CODA isn’t qualified. See IRC 401(k)(1).
Scrutinize multiemployer plans that incorporate tiered contribution or allocation formulas to determine whether these formulas provide an election.
In most cases, when an employee changes classes/tiers, the plan makes an increased contribution and decreases the participant’s wages by the same amount.
If the participant may elect to reduce their wages and increase their contribution, then the plan is, in effect, a cash or deferred arrangement.
To detect this type of arrangement, read the language in the CBAs and in the plan.
If the language is incorporated by reference, be sure that the incorporation follows the rules of IRM 184.108.40.206, Incorporating Auxiliary Documents by Reference.
The tiered annuity contribution formula could also fail the definitely determinable rule of 26 CFR 1.401-1(b)(1)(i) if the tiers are determined by an individual or party other than the employee participant. The plan may not allow discretion for contributions to the plan, and the contribution must be the employees' decision.
If you find a post-ERISA money purchase plan with a CODA, disqualify the plan unless:
It’s an initial plan submitted within its first remedial amendment period and the plan is amended to remove the CODA.
The taxpayer enters the Closing Agreement Program. See IRM 7.11.8, EP Determinations Closing Agreement Program.
The taxpayer is entitled to IRC 7805(b) relief.
These arrangements are often difficult to detect and tend to be at least partially contained in the CBA. See Exhibit 7.11.6-1, Sample Language of a CODA in a Money Purchase Plan, for sample language which may indicate that a CODA is present.
Some multiemployer pension plans issue an extra yearly payment to pay-status participants when the plan assets perform better than expected. The extra payment is referred is as a thirteenth check. Thirteenth check distributions are permitted by:
Plan language permitting 13th check distributions.
Plan amendment or trustee action authorization.
In 2017, S’s pension fund realized investment earnings for the fiscal year (ending June 30) of $350 million. Costs for the fund, including retiree payments and broker fees, were $250 million. That left a balance of $100 million, which was a large enough surplus to trigger that plan’s 13th check program and retirees received an extra check at the end of 2017.
The 13th check can’t be limited to "dues paying" members or other similar restrictions, as the trustee has a duty to all of the participants and not to the participating employers or union that named the trustee. If the trustee required retirees to pay union dues or another similar restriction to receive the 13th check, the trustee would be breaching their duty.
To satisfy the definitely determinable requirement of 26 CFR 1.401-1(b)(1), the authorizing plan language or amendment should define:
Who is eligible for the extra payment.
How the amount of the payment will be calculated.
When the payment will occur.
This pension plan’s language is acceptable: “A 13th check will be issued in December, following the end of a fiscal year (ending Sept. 30) where the earnings less the cost of the fund produces a number greater than $100,000. To be eligible for the benefit, you must have at least 10 years of service credit and be on the retirement payroll for the month of December in the year in which the benefit is paid. Eligible participants will receive up to $45 per year of service credit.”
If the plan doesn’t have a permanent provision, but is regularly amended to provide 13th checks (as well as other retiree increases), the series of amendments may create an expectation of these payments and be subject to protection as an accrued benefit under IRC 411(d)(6).
A generous 13th check may violate IRC 415 limits or cause the benefit formula to be back-loaded in violation of IRC 411(b).
The 13th checks that are part of the participant's accrued benefit are subject to joint and survivor requirements. If any non-collectively bargained retirees receive a 13th check, these distributions must satisfy the non-discrimination rules for former employees in 26 CFR 1.401(a)(4)-10.
PPA added IRC 432 to provide special rules for underfunded multiemployer DB plans. These rules include two provisions that may require plan amendments:
If a multiemployer DB plan is certified to be in critical status (defined in IRC 432(b)(2)), it must be amended in its initial critical year to suspend the payment of benefits in the form of a lump sum or other accelerated payment form, if offered under the plan. IRC 432(f)(2).
If a multiemployer DB plan is certified to be in critical status (defined in IRC 432(b)(2)), it may, but isn’t required to, be amended to reduce or eliminate adjustable benefits (defined in IRC 432(e)(8)), including adjustable benefits that are otherwise protected under IRC 411(d)(6), as based on the outcome of collective bargaining over these reductions and conditioned on providing appropriate notice. IRC 432(e)(8)
Under the Multiemployer Pension Reform Act of 2014 (MRPA), a plan in critical and declining status may, via plan amendment, suspend benefits that the sponsor deems appropriate. MRPA added Code Section 432(e)(9) which:
Prescribes rules for these suspensions.
Lists conditions that must be satisfied before a plan sponsor may suspend benefits.
A plan is in critical and declining status per IRC 432(b)(6) if it is both:
In critical status
Projected to become insolvent per IRC 418E during the current plan year or any of the next 14 succeeding plan years (or 19 succeeding plan years if a plan has a ratio of inactive participants to active participants that exceeds two to one, or if the funded % of the plan is less than 80 percent).
Under MRPA, the Treasury Secretary, in consultation with the Pension Benefit Guarantee Corporation (PBGC) & Secretary of Labor, must approve any benefit suspension. Final guidance on the MPRA benefit suspensions was issued in April 2016. See Rev. Proc. 2016-27 & 26 CFR 1.432(e)(9)-1.
If your case has a MPRA amendment, consult your manager for how to proceed.
Per Rev. Rul. 89-87, "Termination of a multiemployer plan under Title IV of ERISA generally does not result in plan assets being distributed as soon as administratively feasible after the date of plan termination under Title IV. Accordingly such a plan will not be treated as terminated under section 401(a) of the Code and will have to continue to meet the requirements of section 401(a) to retain its qualified status."
Therefore, even if a plan is terminated for PBGC and Title IV purposes, it’s treated as an on-going plan for IRC 401(a) purposes until all assets are distributed.
|Sample Plan Language which could indicate a CODA in a Money Purchase Plan|
|Effective _, the Plan may receive tiered annuity contributions from Covered Employees in accordance with the provisions and classifications specified in the collective bargaining agreement governing such Covered Employees. Contributions remitted pursuant to such classifications shall be added to a Covered Employee’s Individual Account and shall only be permitted if the jurisdiction in which the Covered Employee is employed has adopted language in the collective bargaining agreement permitting classifications and tiered annuity contributions pursuant to such classifications.|
|A Covered Employee shall be permitted to change his classification as specified in the language of the collective bargaining agreement covering such Employees. Changes in a Covered Employee’s classification shall be in writing on an approved form and in accordance with the rules and regulations adopted by the Board of Trustees.|
|Sample CBA Language which could indicate a CODA in a Money Purchase Plan|
|Section _: Contributions required to be made on behalf of each classification shall be as follows:|
|Class I $0.75|
|Class II $1.50 (All Class II employees will have their base hourly wage reduced by $.75 per hour)|
|Class III $2.25 (All Class III employees will have their base hourly wage reduced by $1.50 per hour)|
|Class I shall include all second, third, fourth and fifth year apprentices and all employees not identified as Class II or Class III.|
|Class II shall consist of employees who have performed at least six months work at the journeyman level or above.|
|Class III shall consist of employees with five years or more employment in the industry.|
|Each Employee shall submit to the Local Union by May 1 or November 1 of each year any classification change request. Notifications shall be made on an approved form in accordance with the rules and regulations adopted by the Union and approved by the Chapter.|