An Action on Decision (AOD) is a formal memorandum prepared by the IRS Office of Chief Counsel that announces the future litigation position the IRS will take with regard to the court decision addressed by the AOD.

The following list initially presents these documents in reverse chronological order, from the present back to calendar year 1997.

View information about Using IRS Forms, Instructions, Publications and Other Item Files.

  1. Enter a term in the Find box.
  2. Click the Search button.
Tìm Trợ Giúp
Số Quyết định Vấn đề Ngày Phát Hành
2001-07 Robert L. Beck v. Comm, T.C. 2001-198( filed 07/30/01). The Action on Decision reflects the Service's acquiescence in the court's conclusion that it had the authority to review respondent’s denial of equitable relief under section 66(c) in a deficiency proceeding. The Tax Court construed the taxpayer's contention as a prayer for relief under section 66(c), which may provide relief from income tax liability with respect to unreported community income. The Service argued that the taxpayer failed to meet the 01/01/2002
2001-06 Therese Hahn v. Commissioner, 110 T. C. No. 140 (1998) Reflects the Service's acquiescence in the court's conclusion that the 1981 amendment did not expressly repeal the effective date of section 2040(b)(1), since there is no language in the 1981 amendment that specifically repeals the effective date of subsection (b)(1). The Court also held that the 1981 amendment did not impliedly repeal the effective date of section 2040(b)(1), because section 2040(b)(1) enacted in 1976 and the 1981 amendment to 10/18/2001
2001-05 Mesa Oil, Inc. v. United States. Reflects the Service's nonacquiescence whether a verbatim recording of a collection due process (CDP) hearing is required under §§ 6320 and 6330 to create a judicially reviewable administrative record. The district court held the administrative record to be inadequate for judicial review under section 6330(d)(1)(B), because “no record of the hearing was made, and no analysis of the evidence or arguments was presented in the 08/23/2001
2001-04 Exxon v. Commissioner, 113 T. C. No. 338 (1999). Reflects the Service's acquiescence in result only in the court's conclusion, with respect to the net income issue, that the PRT allowances effectively compensated for the nondeductibility of interest expense and that the PRT, in its predominant character, constituted a tax in the nature of an income or excess profits tax in the U.S. sense. In reaching this holding, the Court relied on “representative industry data” presented at trial by Exxon. The Court 08/17/2001
2001-03 Farmland Industries, Inc. v. Comm., T.C. Memo. 1999-388 T.C. Reflects the Service's acquiescence in the Court's conclusion that held that each corporation was formed, operated, and sold to facilitate the petitioner's petroleum business. Because a sufficient nexus to the patronage business existed, the court found the stock not to be an investment and held its sale generated patronage income or loss. Likewise, the section 1231 assets were found to be used in the petitioner's 03/27/2001
2001-02 Arnold W. Vinick v. USA, 205 F.3d 1 (1st Cir. 2000). Reflects the Service's nonacquiescence in the First Circuit's reversal of the lower court's decision that Vinick was liable as a responsible person under section 6672 for the unpaid withholding taxes of Jefferson Bronze Company. The First Circuit held that the lower courts' findings of fact were 'based on a misunderstanding of the legal standard for what constitutes a responsible person.' The court further stated that [a]bsent a 02/27/2001
2001-01 Security State Bank v. Comm., 214 F.3d 1254 (10 th Cir. 2000). This Action on decisions reflects the Service's acquiescence in the Court's conclusion that neither section 1281(a)(1) nor section 1281(a)(2) were applicable to short-term loans made in the ordinary course of business. 01/29/2001
2000-09 Weisbart v. United States Dept of Treas. & IRS. Reflects the Service's acquiescence with the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit's decision that section 7502 treats the claim as filed on the date of mailing (August 17, 1995) because the taxpayer mailed the claim on the last day of the period prescribed for filing the claim with respect to the withheld taxes. Pointing to Treas. Reg. §§ 301.6402-3(a)(5) and 301.7502-1, the Second 11/17/2000
2000-08 John D. Shea v. Commissioner, 112 T.C. 183 (1999) The Tax Court held that the burden of proof should be placed on the Commissioner with respect to the section 66(b) issue. Rather than relying on established case law for its determination as to whether the section 66(b) issue was new matter, the court incorporated section 7522 into its analysis. Section 7522 requires the Commissioner to issue a notice of deficiency which contains a description of the basis for the Commissioner's tax 11/03/2000
2000-06 Diane Fernandez v. Commissioner, 114 T. C. No 21. Reflects the Service's acquiescence in the court's conclusion holding that when a taxpayer makes a requisite election under sections 6015(b) and/or (c) along with its request under section 6015(f), and files a timely petition with the Tax Court pursuant to section 6015(e), the Tax Court has jurisdiction to review the request for innocent spouse relief under all subsections of section 6015.The court reasoned that the statutory language gave 09/25/2000
2000-07 Kathy A. King v. Commissoner, 115 T.C. No. 8 (Aug 10, 2000). Reflects the Service's acquiescence in the Court's conclusion that held that the nonpetitionering spouse was entitled to notice and an opportunity to intervene. The Tax Court reasoned that the rationale for the notice and intervention rules of section 6015(e)(4), i.e., fairness to the nonelecting spouse to be heard in order to ensure that innocent spouse relief is granted on the merits after taking into account all relevant 09/25/2000
2000-04 Smith v. Comm, 198 F.3d 515 (5th Cir. 1999), rev'g, 108 T.C. 412. The Tax Court upheld the Commissioner’s determination that the claim against the estate should be limited to the amount actually paid. The Tax Court held that, '[w]here a claim is disputed, contingent, or uncertain as of the date of the decedent's death, the estate is not entitled to a deduction until the claim is resolved and it is determined what amount, if any, will be paid. It is this latter amount that is allowed as a deduction.' 108 T.C. at 419. 05/09/2000
2000-05 Osteopathic Medical v. Commissioner, 113 T.C. No. 26. This Action on Decision reflects the Service's acquiescence in the court's conclusion that held that the taxpayer was not required to account for inventories or to use an accrual method of accounting based on its determination that the furnishing of chemotherapy drugs was not a sale of merchandise within the meaning of Treas. Reg. § 1.471-1. Osteopathic Medical Oncology and Hematology, P.C. v. Commissioner, 113 T.C. No. 26 (No. 11551-98 Nov. 22, 1999). 04/29/2000
2000-03 Simpson v. United States, 183 F.3d 812 (8th Cir. 1999). Reflects the Service's nonacquiescence in the Court's conclusion, that under the plain language of TRA 86 section 1433(b)(2)(A), the statutory protection applies to transfers under trusts that were irrevocable on September 25, 1985, because Congress intended to protect trust creators who relied on the law as it existed at the time the trust became irrevocable. The district court in Simpson v. United States, 17 03/04/2000
1998-06 Estate of Clara K. Hoover v. Comm., 69 F.3d 1044 (10th Cir. 1995). This Action on decision reflects the Service's agreement with the circuit court's ruling that, in the absence of regulations, an estate claiming a special use valuation under I.R.C. § 2032A for property used for farming purposes may also take into account a minority interest discount in valuing the property. 03/03/2000
2000-02 Ahadpour v. Comm., T.C. Memo. 1999-9. This Action on Decision reflects the Service's acquiescence in the Court's conclusion, to the extent, that the Tax Court held that petitioners had only a conditional right to retain the escrow payments. In the court's view, the unconditional right to retain the escrow payments arose only after buyer paid the remainder of the purchase price and the deed was delivered. 03/03/2000
1999-16 Conway v. Commissioner, 111 T.C. 350 (1998) Reflects the Service's acquiescence in the Court's conclusion that held that the transaction was a nontaxable exchange pursuant to section 1035. Consequently, the 10-percent penalty under section 72(q), which generally applies to taxable distributions from an annuity, was not applicable to the transaction. Section 1035(a)(3) provides that no gain or loss shall be recognized on the exchange of an annuity contract for another annuity contract. See also Treas 03/03/2000
1999-06 Estate of Mellinger v. Commissioner, 112 T.C. 4 (1999). Reflects the Service's acquiescence in the Court's conclusion that closely-held stock held in a QTIP trust should not be aggregated, for valuation pusposes, with stock in the same corporation held in a revocable trust and includible in the decedent's gross estate. The Tax Court's decision in this case is consistent with the Service’s position regarding the valuation of minority interests passing to QTIP trusts. The proper funding of the 03/03/2000
1999-05 St. Jude Medical, Inc. v Comm, 34 F. 3d 1394 (8th Cir. 1994). Reflects the conclusion by the Eighth Circuit that for purposes of calculating the CTI of a DISC, mandating the use of SIC categories to allocate R&D expenses is inconsistent with Congress's intent in enacting the DISC statute to allow costs to be allocated on a product-by-product basis or on the basis of product lines. The Court also stated that the mandated use of Section 1.861-8 by 03/03/2000
1999-09 IRS v. Waldschmidt (In re Bradley), (M.D. Tenn. 1999). This Action on Decision reflects the Service's acquiescence in the Court's interpretation of amended setion 121 in light of section 1398 and declining to follow Mehr and Barden, held that a bankruptcy estate steps into the debtor's shoes for purposes of section 121. 03/03/2000
1998-08 Fluor v. U.S., 126 F.3d 1397 (Fed. Cir. 1997). Although the Service agrees with the Federal Circuit's holding that an underpayment of tax that is eliminated by the carryback of excess foreign tax credits from a later year remains due and unpaid for purposes of computing interest until the year in which the credit arises, the Service does not agree with the court's determination that interest on the underpayment stops running on the last day of that tax year. 03/03/2000
1997-08 May Department Stores Co. v. United States, 36 Fed. Cl. 680. May Department Stores Co. v. United States, 36 Fed. Cl. 680 (Ct. Fed. Cls. 1996). AOD reflects the Service's agreement that, if a taxpayer elects to have overpayments of tax reported on a timely filed income tax return credited to the next year's tax liability without specifying the estimated tax installment against which the overpayment is to be credited, the Service, in computing interest on any subsequently determined tax deficiencies for the tax year in which the overpayments were reported, will not treat the reported overpayments of tax as having been credited against installments of 03/03/2000
1999-14 Mutual Assurance, Inc. v. United States, 56 F.3d 1353. Reflects the Service's nonacquiescence in the court's conclusion that held that a timely filed claim for refund that was allowed in full may be amended after the expiration of the statute of limitations for filing a claim for refund. The court relied on Bemis Brothers Bag Co. v. United States, 289 U.S. 28 (1933) which dealt with whether the original claim and the amended claim perfected after the limitations period had sufficient similarity for the amendment to 03/03/2000
1997-14 Transwestern Pipeline Co. v. United States, 639 F.2d 679. Revised AOD reflects the Service's agreement with the Court of Claims' conclusion that recoverable line pack gas, which is used to maintain adequate pressure in gas pipelines, is appropriately treated as a capital asset rather than included in the taxpayer's inventory of gas available for sale. 03/03/2000
1999-04 Oshkosh Truck Corporation v. United States 123 F.3d 1477. Reflects the Service's acquiescence that a presumed markup percentage must be used in computing the vehicular excise tax on automotive articles sold to the United States directly by manufacturers when there are no retail sales outlets for such automotive articles. 03/03/2000

Official Adobe Website